Longitudinal short-distance constraints on hadronic light-by-light scattering and tensor meson contributions to the muon $g-2$

Anton Rebhan; Jonas Mager; Josef Leutgeb; Luigi Cappiello

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 72 references

Longitudinal short-distance constraints on hadronic light-by-light scattering and tensor meson contributions to the muon $g-2$

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Holographic QCD predicts that the complete tower of tensor mesons contributes about +11 x 10^-11 to the muon anomalous magnetic moment, potentially resolving the current gap between dispersive and lattice determinations of hadronic…

desk verdict A serious hQCD-based argument that tensor towers fill the symmetric longitudinal SDC and give a positive ~11 x 10^-11 HLbL contribution; the number is model-dependent and sign-controlled by unmeasured F_T^3, but the mechanism is novel and worth reviewing. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.19293 v4 pith:4IJ3XS2J submitted 2025-01-31 hep-ph

Jonas Mager , Luigi Cappiello , Josef Leutgeb , Anton Rebhan This is my paper · ORCID

classification hep-ph

keywords muong-2hadroniclight-by-lightscatteringholographicQCDtensormesonsshort-distanceconstraintstransitionformfactorsaxial-vectorlattice

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to show that the missing 19% of the symmetric longitudinal short-distance constraint in holographic QCD is supplied by the infinite tower of tensor mesons, which in these models contribute only to that constraint. Once the tensor coupling is normalized by requiring saturation of the constraint together with axial-vector mesons, the full tensor tower gives a sizeable positive contribution $a_\mu^{\mathrm{T}}=11.1^{+1.3}_{-3.0}\times 10^{-11}$, mostly from photon virtualities below 1.5 GeV. This would move the dispersive hadronic light-by-light prediction from about $102\times 10^{-11}$ to roughly $113\times 10^{-11}$, bringing it into line with recent lattice QCD results. The authors therefore propose tensor mesons as the component that reconciles dispersive and lattice determinations of the muon $g-2$.

What carries the argument

The mechanism is a holographic model in which tensor mesons arise as traceless-transverse fluctuations of the 5D metric, producing an infinite tower of flavor-singlet states with masses fixed by zeros of the Bessel function $J_1$ (lowest mass 1.235 GeV, about 3% below the physical $f_2(1270)$). The load-bearing object is the zero-momentum bulk-to-bulk tensor propagator $G(z,z';0)=-\tfrac14\min(z^4,z'^4)$, which sums the entire tower and converts a nearly negligible ground-state pole into the large $11\times 10^{-11}$ effect; in the symmetric limit this propagator yields 12.23% of the operator-product-expansion value for the longitudinal amplitude, while contributing nothing to the asymmetric Melnikov–Vainshtein limit. The calculation involves two tensor transition form factors, $F_1^T$ and $F_3^T$, of which $F_3^T$ is not constrained by single-tag data and is responsible for the sizable positive low-energy contribution. Combining the tensor tower with the axial-vector tower saturates the symmetric longitudinal short-distance constraint to 93–98%, depending on the choice of the 5D gauge coupling $g_5$.

What would settle it

A future measurement of the doubly virtual $f_2(1270)$ transition form factor that separates the two structure functions $F_1^T$ and $F_3^T$ would settle the claim: the holographic prediction of a large positive low-energy contribution requires $F_3^T$ to be sizable and of the same sign as $F_1^T$, so data showing $F_3^T$ small or opposite in sign would falsify the $+11\times 10^{-11}$ result.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the infinite tower of tensor mesons in holographic QCD contributes exclusively to the symmetric longitudinal short-distance constraint, where the axial-vector tower alone reaches only about 81% of the operator-product-expansion value. Once the tensor coupling is fixed by saturating this constraint together with the axial vectors, the full tower—not just the $f_2(1270)$ ground state—produces a positive contribution $a_\mu^{\mathrm{T}}=11.1^{+1.3}_{-3.0}\times 10^{-11}$, more than 90% of it from photon virtualities below 1.5 GeV. The holographic sign is opposite to the quark-model-based dispersive estimate, and the size is enough to raise the dispersive hadronic light-by-light total from about $102\times 10^{-11}$ to roughly $113\times 10^{-11}$, in agreement with the latest lattice QCD values. The authors present this as the missing piece that reconciles data-driven and lattice determinations of hadronic light-by-light scattering.

Load-bearing premise

The result hinges on an unmeasured piece of the tensor meson's two-photon transition amplitude and on replacing the ground-state pole by the full infinite tower of excited tensor states; if that unmeasured piece were smaller or opposite in sign, the +11 x $10^{-11}$ contribution could become negative.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The complete tensor meson contribution to hadronic light-by-light scattering is about $11\times 10^{-11}$, not the near-negligible ground-state value, so any complete evaluation must include the excited tensor tower.
Adding this contribution raises the dispersive hadronic light-by-light total to roughly $113\times 10^{-11}$, matching the lattice values near $110$–$125\times 10^{-11}$ and reducing the previous tension.
The symmetric longitudinal short-distance constraint is saturated only by the combined axial-vector and tensor towers, meaning data-driven dispersive analyses cannot omit tensor mesons without leaving a short-distance imbalance.
The holographic sign of the tensor contribution is positive, opposite to the quark-model-based estimate, a difference that can be tested by measuring the doubly virtual tensor transition form factor.
Excited tensor states contribute several times more than the ground state in the low-energy region, so effective-pole approximations that include only the $f_2(1270)$ underestimate the effect.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The sharpest test is the doubly virtual $f_2(1270)$ transition form factor: if the unmeasured structure function $F_3^T$ is smaller or of opposite sign to the holographic prediction, the $+11\times 10^{-11}$ result could turn negative, as in the quark-model estimate.
The same mechanism may extend to other unflavored towers: any resonance family coupling only to the symmetric longitudinal amplitude could shift the hadronic light-by-light prediction further, so the remaining few percent of the short-distance constraint deserve attention.
A lattice QCD calculation isolating the tensor-meson channel in the window below 1.5 GeV would provide a model-independent check of the $8.5\times 10^{-11}$ infrared contribution claimed here.
The holographic model's degenerate flavor-singlet tensor multiplet sidesteps realistic $f_2$–$a_2$–$f_2'$ mixing and SU(3) breaking, which could redistribute the contribution among channels and alter comparisons with exclusive data.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

First thing to know: this is a coherent, careful hQCD calculation that identifies a specific mechanism—the infinite tower of tensor mesons contributes only to the symmetric longitudinal short-distance constraint, not to the Melnikov-Vainshtein one—and shows that it can close the 19% gap left by axial vectors. The paper is also unusually transparent about what would break the result. But the headline +11 x 10^-11 is a model prediction, not a QCD result, and its sign is controlled by a structure function that no current data constrain. Treat it as a motivated estimate, not a resolution of the lattice-dispersive tension.

What is genuinely new: the observation about the tensor tower dropping out of the MV-SDC is absent from the cited literature, and the derivation of Eq. (23) is explicit and checkable. The Belle comparison for the singly-virtual TFF in Fig. 1 is a legitimate anchor, and the consistency between the SDC-saturation route and the experimental two-photon width route (Table I) is a real point in the paper's favor. The paper also states plainly, in the last paragraph of Sec. IV, that the sizable positive contribution is a consequence of F_T^3, which is not constrained by singly virtual data, and that dropping it would give negative results. That is the right level of candor.

The soft spots are real but mostly acknowledged. The stress-test note is correct that the symmetric SDC fixes only an overall coupling, not the relative weight of F_T^1 and F_T^3, so the sign and magnitude of aT are not protected. I would add that the central values in Eq. (26) come after rescaling the tensor contribution by factors 1.536 or 1.373 to enforce the symmetric SDC, so the numerology is partly a restatement of that input. The alternative fit to experimental widths gives consistent numbers, which softens this concern, but it does not remove it. The full-tower resummation via G(z,z';0) is simple and exact, though the derivation lives in the companion paper [66]; for a Letter that is acceptable.

None of this kills the paper. The structural claim—that the symmetric LSDC can be saturated by axial plus tensor towers—holds up within hQCD. The aT number is soft, but the paper says so itself. The citation pattern looks honest; Refs. [28,29] and [50] are engaged with directly rather than waved off.

For anyone working on HLbL or holographic QCD, this is worth reading and worth citing as a concrete, falsifiable model prediction. It deserves a serious referee, ideally one who will also check [66]. I would send it to review.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper studies the role of tensor mesons in the longitudinal short-distance constraints (LSDCs) of hadronic light-by-light scattering within hard-wall holographic QCD. It derives the contribution of the infinite tower of tensor modes to the longitudinal HLbL amplitude, shows that this tower contributes only to the symmetric LSDC and not to the asymmetric Melnikov-Vainshtein limit, and finds that adding this contribution to the axial-vector tower saturates the symmetric LSDC at 93.45% when the tensor coupling is fixed by the energy-momentum tensor two-point function. Matching the coupling instead by imposing full saturation yields a total tensor contribution to the muon g-2 of about 11.1(+1.3,-3.0) x 10^-11, dominated by the region below 1.5 GeV. The authors argue that this positive contribution could explain the remaining gap between recent dispersive and lattice evaluations of the full HLbL contribution.

Significance. If the hQCD prediction for the doubly virtual tensor transition form factor F_T^3 survives experimental scrutiny, this paper identifies a potentially important and previously underestimated contribution to the muon g-2 and provides a concrete dynamical mechanism for saturating the symmetric LSDC. The within-model derivation is coherent: Eq. (23) gives a finite coefficient, the tensor tower vanishes in the asymmetric limit, and the Belle comparison in Fig. 1 is a nontrivial check of the singly virtual form factor. The authors are also transparent about their main caveat, namely that F_T^3 is not constrained by existing data. However, the headline numerical result is obtained only after imposing the symmetric LSDC and is controlled by this unmeasured form factor, so the paper's quantitative claim is a model prediction rather than a QCD-level result.

major comments (3)

[Section IV, Eqs. (19), (25), (26), and final paragraph] The central numerical result aT,total = 11.1(+1.3,-3.0) x 10^-11 is controlled by the doubly virtual structure function F_T^3 defined in Eq. (19), which is not constrained by the Belle data shown in Fig. 1. The authors themselves state in the final paragraph that dropping F_T^3 gives 'even larger but negative results' and that the sizable positive contribution is a consequence of this term. Since the sign and magnitude of F_T^3 are not tested, the claim that tensor mesons 'could explain the remaining gap between the most recent dispersive and lattice results' is not supported at the same level as the derivation of the LSDC coefficients. The manuscript should either present the result explicitly as a conditional hQCD prediction whose sign is to be tested in doubly virtual measurements, or supply independent evidence or a concrete experimental test for F_T^3.
[Section IV, Eqs. (23)-(26)] The 93.45% saturation obtained with kT from Eq. (24) is not the input used for the final aT. Instead, the authors rescale the tensor contribution by factors 1.536 or 1.373 so that the symmetric LSDC is saturated, and then apply the same factors to the g-2 integral in Eq. (25). This makes the quantitative result a consequence of imposing the symmetric LSDC rather than an independent prediction. The error estimate in Eq. (26) spans the two fit choices, but the underlying assumption that saturation must be exact is not derived. The logical status of this step should be clarified, and the sensitivity of the final aT to relaxing the saturation condition should be shown.
[Section IV, text after Eq. (23)] The paper notes that the tensor contribution from Eq. (23) with kT of Eq. (24) has the wrong large-Nc scaling, N_c^0 (trQ^2)^2 instead of N_c trQ^4, and that the correct behavior would require a different choice of kT. This is an internal consistency issue for the model as a QCD dual: the same coupling kT is used to normalize the tensor modes and to compute the HLbL amplitude, yet it does not reproduce the OPE scaling. The manuscript should either justify why the symmetric SDC saturation should be imposed despite this mismatch, or treat the required rescaling as an explicit model defect rather than a success.

minor comments (4)

[Abstract and Introduction] The abstract and introduction present the 'gap-filling' scenario as the main conclusion, while the decisive caveat about F_T^3 appears only in the final paragraph of Section IV. Moving that caveat to the abstract or introduction would give readers a more accurate impression of the model dependence.
[Table I caption] The columns labeled 'IR' and 'Mixed' are defined only in the body text; defining them in the caption would improve readability.
[Eq. (24)] The value kT = 5/(16 pi^2) is quoted without derivation; a one-sentence explanation of the matching to the energy-momentum tensor two-point function, beyond the reference to [63], would help the reader assess the model dependence.
[Section IV, Eq. (25)] The relation between the pole contributions in Table I and the full-tower results in Eq. (25) is not explained in this Letter; the text should state explicitly that the difference is the excited-tensor contribution, since the reader would otherwise need to consult [66] to verify the decomposition.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the symmetric LSDC is an independent OPE constraint used only to fix an overall normalization, and the resulting tensor-meson g-2 value is a nontrivial low-energy integral subject to external Belle and width checks.

full rationale

The central derivation is self-contained and not circular. The symmetric LSDC (Csym = -4/(9π^2), Eq. (7)) is an external OPE constraint; the axial-vector tower saturates it only at 81.22% (Eq. (12)), and the tensor tower with the independent normalization kT = 5/(16π^2) from Eq. (24) contributes 12.23% (Eq. (23)), giving 93.45%. This is a model result, not an input. The alternative normalizations (factors 1.536 or 1.373) are obtained by matching the combined axial-plus-tensor towers to the same OPE constraint, which fixes only the overall coupling kT; the reported g-2 values (Eqs. (25)-(26), with 8.5 of 11.1 units from the IR region Qi <= 1.5 GeV) are weighted integrals over the model transition form factors and are not forced to equal the OPE coefficient by construction. The paper also cross-checks kT against Belle single-tag TFF data and measured two-photon widths (Table I), providing external anchoring. The admitted dependence on F_T^3, 'which is not constrained by existing data on singly virtual TFFs for tensor mesons,' is a genuine model-uncertainty/correctness risk for the sign and magnitude of the contribution, but it is not a circular use of the target result; the paper explicitly calls for doubly virtual T -> gamma* gamma* data to test this prediction. Self-citations to the companion paper [66] supply supporting details (e.g., the role of F_T^3 and Appendix A arguments), but the load-bearing equations (17)-(23) appear in the present text, so these self-citations are not load-bearing in a circular sense. Overall, the derivation does not reduce to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The paper's quantitative prediction rests on the hard-wall hQCD model, the metric-fluctuation description of tensor mesons, the q^2=0 bulk-to-bulk propagator for the tower sum, and the OPE constraints as external anchors. The tensor coupling kT is the main adjustable knob: with the original kT the symmetric constraint is matched at 93.45%, and the headline 11.1 x 10^-11 uses a rescaled kT that enforces exact saturation. No new fundamental entity is proposed, but the excited tensor tower is a model construct whose low-energy contribution is the key output.

free parameters (4)

z0 (hard-wall cutoff) = 3.102 GeV^-1
Fixed by identifying the lowest vector mode with the rho meson mass; sets all meson masses and the integration range.
g5^2 (5D gauge coupling) = (2 pi)^2 (OPE fit) or 0.894 (2 pi)^2 (F_rho fit)
Determines the strength of meson couplings to currents; the two options bracket the central tensor contribution.
kT (tensor meson coupling) = 5/(16 pi^2) from Eq. (24), or multiplied by 1.536 (OPE) and 1.373 (F_rho)
The central aT = 11.1 result uses the enhanced values that force saturation of the symmetric LSDC, so the headline number is partly fixed by the constraint it is said to satisfy.
Q0 (IR/mixed separation scale) = 1.5 GeV
Chosen to split contributions into low-energy, mixed, and high-energy regions; the total aT is independent of this cutoff, but the reported IR fraction depends on it.

assumptions (6)

domain assumption Hard-wall AdS/QCD with a 5D Yang-Mills action and Chern-Simons term is a valid effective theory for QCD hadronic correlators.
All results are computed in this model; its validity is inherited from prior literature, not established here.
domain assumption Tensor mesons are represented by traceless-transverse fluctuations of the AdS metric with dynamics governed by the 5D Einstein-Hilbert action.
This is the framework of Ref. [63]; it determines F_T^3, the unmeasured form factor that dominates the positive contribution.
standard math The operator product expansion short-distance constants C_MV and C_sym, Eqs. (6)-(7), are correct external benchmarks.
Taken from Refs. [13,21,51,52]; the saturation argument compares the model to these values.
domain assumption The infinite tower sum can be represented by the bulk-to-bulk propagator at q^2=0, G(z,z';0) = -(1/4) min(z^4,z'^4).
Used to derive Eq. (22); this choice is load-bearing because pole-only and full-tower results differ by a factor of about 3.5.
standard math The BTT decomposition and the master formula Eq. (4) correctly convert the HLbL tensor into a_mu.
Established dispersive framework from Refs. [16,47,39]; the paper relies on it to compute the tensor contribution to g-2.
domain assumption Large-Nc counting requires the symmetric LSDC to scale as Nc trQ^4.
Used to argue that the standard kT choice has incorrect large-Nc scaling and to motivate alternative normalizations.

invented entities (1)

Infinite tower of excited tensor mesons in hard-wall holographic QCD
purpose: Supplies the missing portion of the symmetric longitudinal short-distance constraint and produces most of the predicted +11 x 10^-11 HLbL contribution via the non-pole part of the bulk-to-bulk propagator.
Masses m_n = 1.235, 2.917, 4.230 GeV follow from Bessel zeros; only the ground state f2(1270) is experimentally established, so the tower and its couplings are model constructs with no direct independent confirmation.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Longitudinal short-distance constraints on hadronic light-by-light scattering and tensor meson contributions to the muon $g-2$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4IJ3XS2J

@misc{pith2026250119293,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Longitudinal short-distance constraints on hadronic light-by-light scattering and tensor meson contributions to the muon $g-2$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4IJ3XS2J}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.19293}
}

abstract

Short-distance constraints from the operator product expansion in QCD play an important role in the evaluation of the hadronic light-by-light scattering contribution to the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon. While conventional hadronic models involving a finite number of resonances fail to reproduce the correct power laws implied by them, holographic QCD has been shown to naturally incorporate the Melnikov-Vainshtein constraint on the longitudinal amplitude following from the triangle anomaly in the asymmetric limit, where one photon virtuality remains small compared to the others. This is saturated by an infinite tower of axial vector mesons, and their numerical contribution to the muon $g-2$ in AdS/QCD models agrees rather well with a recent dispersive analysis and alternative approaches. However, the longitudinal short-distance constraint where all virtualities are large turns out to be matched only at the level of 81\%. In this Letter we show that tensor mesons, whose contribution to the muon $g-2$ has recently been found to be underestimated, can fill this gap, because in holographic QCD their infinite tower of excited mesons only contributes to the symmetric longitudinal short-distance constraint. Numerically, they give rise to a sizeable positive contribution from the low-energy region below 1.5 GeV, a small one from the mixed region, and a negligible one from the high-energy region, which could explain the remaining gap between the most recent dispersive and lattice results for the complete hadronic light-by-light contribution.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.19293 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** FIG. 2. Contribution of tensor mesons to the symmetric lon [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 15 canonical work pages

[66]

Yang, Selection Rules for the Dematerialization of a Particle Into Two Photons , Phys

C.-N. Yang, Selection Rules for the Dematerialization of a Particle Into Two Photons , Phys. Rev. 77 (1950) 242

work page 1950
[50]

Tarrach, Invariant Amplitudes for Virtual Compton Scattering Off Polarized Nucleons Free from Kinematical Singularities, Zeros and Constraints , Nuovo Cim

R. Tarrach, Invariant Amplitudes for Virtual Compton Scattering Off Polarized Nucleons Free from Kinematical Singularities, Zeros and Constraints , Nuovo Cim. A 28 (1975) 409

work page 1975
[1]

Muon g − 2 collaboration, Measurement of the Positive Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment to 0.20 ppm , Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 (2023) 161802 [ 2308.06230]

arXiv 2023
[2]

Muon g − 2 collaboration, Detailed report on the measurement of the positive muon anomalous magnetic moment to 0.20 ppm , Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) 032009 [2402.15410]

arXiv 2024
[3]

which needs further scrutiny and improvements re- garding its main source of uncertainties to match this precision. At present, the main uncertainty arises from discrepancies in the contribution from hadronic vacuum polarization [4], for which new lattice QCD results [5–12] hold the promise of a more precise evaluation while also removing most of the devi...

work page 2020
[4]

= (−Q2 1, −Q2 2, −Q2 1 − 2Q1Q2τ − Q2 2, 0) . (5) Isolating single resonance exchange contributions to the ¯Πi in terms of their TFFs is a nontrivial task, which has recently been extended to spin-1 and spin-2 reso- nances using a new optimized basis [39]. In the case of tensor meson exchanges, the absence of kinematic sin- gularities is however given only...

work page
[5]

Bors´ anyi et al.,Leading hadronic contribution to the muon magnetic moment from lattice QCD , Nature 593 (2021) 51 [ 2002.12347]

S. Bors´ anyi et al.,Leading hadronic contribution to the muon magnetic moment from lattice QCD , Nature 593 (2021) 51 [ 2002.12347]

arXiv 2021
[6]

C` e et al.,Window observable for the hadronic vacuum polarization contribution to the muon g − 2 from lattice QCD , Phys

M. C` e et al.,Window observable for the hadronic vacuum polarization contribution to the muon g − 2 from lattice QCD , Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) 114502 [2206.06582]

arXiv 2022

Show all 72 references

[7]

Aoyama et al., The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon in the Standard Model , Phys

T. Aoyama et al., The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon in the Standard Model , Phys. Rept. 887 (2020) 1 [ 2006.04822]

2020 arXiv
[8]

Colangelo et al., Prospects for precise predictions of aµ in the Standard Model , 2203.15810

G. Colangelo et al., Prospects for precise predictions of aµ in the Standard Model , 2203.15810

arXiv
[9]

RBC, UKQCDcollaboration, Update of Euclidean windows of the hadronic vacuum polarization , Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 054507 [ 2301.08696]

2023 arXiv
[10]

Boccaletti et al., High precision calculation of the hadronic vacuum polarisation contribution to the muon anomaly, 2407.10913

A. Boccaletti et al., High precision calculation of the hadronic vacuum polarisation contribution to the muon anomaly, 2407.10913

arXiv
[11]

ETM collaboration, Lattice calculation of the short and intermediate time-distance hadronic vacuum polarization contributions to the muon magnetic moment using twisted-mass fermions , Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) 074506 [ 2206.15084]

2023 arXiv
[12]

Fermilab Lattice, HPQCD, MILCcollaboration, Light-quark connected intermediate-window contributions to the muon g-2 hadronic vacuum polarization from lattice QCD , Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) 114514 [2301.08274]

2023 arXiv
[13]

Melnikov and A

K. Melnikov and A. Vainshtein, Hadronic light-by-light scattering contribution to the muon anomalous magnetic moment revisited, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 113006 [hep-ph/0312226]

2004 arXiv
[14]

Masjuan and P

P. Masjuan and P. S´ anchez-Puertas,Pseudoscalar-pole contribution to the (gµ − 2): a rational approach , Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 054026 [ 1701.05829]

2017 arXiv
[15]

RBC, UKQCDcollaboration, The long-distance window of the hadronic vacuum polarization for the muon g-2 , Phys. Rev. Lett. 134 (2025) 201901 [2410.20590]

2025 arXiv
[16]

Djukanovic, G

D. Djukanovic, G. von Hippel, S. Kuberski, H.B. Meyer, N. Miller, K. Ottnad et al., The hadronic vacuum polarization contribution to the muon g − 2 at long distances, JHEP 04 (2025) 098 [ 2411.07969]

2025 arXiv
[17]

Hoferichter, B.-L

M. Hoferichter, B.-L. Hoid, B. Kubis, S. Leupold and S.P. Schneider, Pion-pole contribution to hadronic light-by-light scattering in the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon , Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (2018) 112002 [1805.01471]

2018 arXiv
[18]

Hoferichter, B.-L

M. Hoferichter, B.-L. Hoid, B. Kubis, S. Leupold and S.P. Schneider, Dispersion relation for hadronic light-by-light scattering: pion pole , JHEP 10 (2018) 141 [1808.04823]

2018 arXiv
[19]

Colangelo, M

G. Colangelo, M. Hoferichter, M. Procura and P. Stoffer, Rescattering effects in the hadronic-light-by-light contribution to the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon , Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017) 232001 [ 1701.06554]

2017 arXiv
[20]

Colangelo, M

G. Colangelo, M. Hoferichter, M. Procura and P. Stoffer, Dispersion relation for hadronic light-by-light scattering: two-pion contributions , JHEP 04 (2017) 161 [1702.07347]

2017 arXiv
[21]

Colangelo, F

G. Colangelo, F. Hagelstein, M. Hoferichter, L. Laub and P. Stoffer, Short-distance constraints on hadronic light-by-light scattering in the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon , Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 051501 [1910.11881]

2020 arXiv
[22]

Colangelo, F

G. Colangelo, F. Hagelstein, M. Hoferichter, L. Laub and P. Stoffer, Longitudinal short-distance constraints for the hadronic light-by-light contribution to (g − 2)µ with large-Nc Regge models, JHEP 03 (2020) 101 [1910.13432]

2020 arXiv
[23]

G´ erardin, H.B

A. G´ erardin, H.B. Meyer and A. Nyffeler,Lattice calculation of the pion transition form factor with Nf = 2 + 1 Wilson quarks , Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 034520 [1903.09471]

2019 arXiv
[24]

Bijnens, N

J. Bijnens, N. Hermansson-Truedsson and A. Rodr ´ ıguez-S´ anchez,Short-distance constraints for the HLbL contribution to the muon anomalous magnetic moment, Phys. Lett. B 798 (2019) 134994 [1908.03331]

2019 arXiv
[25]

Jegerlehner, The Anomalous Magnetic Moment of the Muon , Springer Tracts Mod

F. Jegerlehner, The Anomalous Magnetic Moment of the Muon , Springer Tracts Mod. Phys. 274 (2017) 1

2017
[26]

Knecht, S

M. Knecht, S. Narison, A. Rabemananjara and D. Rabetiarivony, Scalar meson contributions to aµ from hadronic light-by-light scattering , Phys. Lett. B 787 (2018) 111 [ 1808.03848]

2018 arXiv
[27]

Pauk and M

V. Pauk and M. Vanderhaeghen, Single meson contributions to the muon‘s anomalous magnetic moment, Eur. Phys. J. C 74 (2014) 3008 [ 1401.0832]

2014 arXiv
[28]

Danilkin and M

I. Danilkin and M. Vanderhaeghen, Light-by-light scattering sum rules in light of new data , Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 014019 [ 1611.04646]

2017 arXiv
[29]

Hoferichter, P

M. Hoferichter, P. Stoffer and M. Zillinger, Complete Dispersive Evaluation of the Hadronic Light-by-Light Contribution to Muon g-2 , Phys. Rev. Lett. 134 (2025) 061902 [2412.00190]

2025 arXiv
[30]

Leutgeb and A

J. Leutgeb and A. Rebhan, Axial vector transition form factors in holographic QCD and their contribution to 7 the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon , Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 114015 [ 1912.01596]

2020 arXiv
[31]

Eichmann, C.S

G. Eichmann, C.S. Fischer and R. Williams, Kaon-box contribution to the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 054015 [ 1910.06795]

2020 arXiv
[32]

Hoferichter, P

M. Hoferichter, P. Stoffer and M. Zillinger, Dispersion relation for hadronic light-by-light scattering: subleading contributions, JHEP 02 (2025) 121 [ 2412.00178]

2025 arXiv
[33]

Leutgeb, J

J. Leutgeb, J. Mager and A. Rebhan, Holographic QCD and the muon anomalous magnetic moment , Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (2021) 1008 [ 2110.07458]

2021 arXiv
[34]

Leutgeb, J

J. Leutgeb, J. Mager and A. Rebhan, Hadronic light-by-light contribution to the muon g − 2 from holographic QCD with solved U (1)A problem, Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) 054021 [ 2211.16562]

2023 arXiv
[35]

Cappiello, O

L. Cappiello, O. Cat` a, G. D’Ambrosio, D. Greynat and A. Iyer, Axial-vector and pseudoscalar mesons in the hadronic light-by-light contribution to the muon (g − 2), Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 016009 [ 1912.02779]

2020 arXiv
[36]

Leutgeb and A

J. Leutgeb and A. Rebhan, Hadronic light-by-light contribution to the muon g − 2 from holographic QCD with massive pions , Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 094017 [2108.12345]

2021 arXiv
[37]

and Dyson-Schwinger approximations [38]. Previous results [24] for the contribution of tensor mesons amounted to the almost negligibly small value of +0 .64(13) × 10−11 for the ground state tensor multi- plet with a quark model ansatz for the tensor transition form factors (TF...

2025 arXiv
[38]

Eichmann, C.S

G. Eichmann, C.S. Fischer, T. Haeuser and O. Regenfelder, Axial-vector and scalar contributions to hadronic light-by-light scattering , Eur. Phys. J. C 85 (2025) 445 [ 2411.05652]

2025 arXiv
[39]

best-guess

and without this restriction, which differ strongly. Summing over the whole tower of tensor modes leads to exactly the same result (22), whereas in the case of axial vector mesons there is equivalence between the two possibilities already at the level of individual modes. In t...
[40]

Colangelo, F

P. Colangelo, F. Giannuzzi and S. Nicotri, Hadronic light-by-light scattering contributions to (g − 2)µ from axial-vector and tensor mesons in the holographic soft-wall model , Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 094036 [2402.07579]

2024 arXiv
[41]

Leutgeb, J

J. Leutgeb, J. Mager and A. Rebhan, Superconnections in AdS/QCD and the hadronic light-by-light contribution to the muon g-2 , Phys. Rev. D 111 (2025) 114001 [2411.10432]

2025 arXiv
[42]

Masjuan, P

P. Masjuan, P. Roig and P. S´ anchez-Puertas,The interplay of transverse degrees of freedom and axial-vector mesons with short-distance constraints in g − 2, J. Phys. G 49 (2022) 015002 [ 2005.11761]

2022 arXiv
[43]

Hoferichter, P

M. Hoferichter, P. Stoffer and M. Zillinger, An optimized basis for hadronic light-by-light scattering , JHEP 04 (2024) 092 [ 2402.14060]

2024 arXiv
[44]

Belle collaboration, Study of π0 pair production in single-tag two-photon collisions , Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 032003 [1508.06757]

2016 arXiv
[45]

Chao, R.J

E.-H. Chao, R.J. Hudspith, A. G´ erardin, J.R. Green, H.B. Meyer and K. Ottnad, Hadronic light-by-light contribution to (g − 2)µ from lattice QCD: a complete calculation, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (2021) 651 [2104.02632]

2021 arXiv
[46]

Chao, R.J

E.-H. Chao, R.J. Hudspith, A. G´ erardin, J.R. Green and H.B. Meyer, The charm-quark contribution to light-by-light scattering in the muon (g − 2) from lattice QCD, Eur. Phys. J. C 82 (2022) 664 [ 2204.08844]

2022 arXiv
[47]

RBC, UKQCDcollaboration, Hadronic light-by-light contribution to the muon anomaly from lattice QCD with infinite volume QED at physical pion mass , Phys. Rev. D 111 (2025) 014501 [ 2304.04423]

2025 arXiv
[48]

Fodor, A

Z. Fodor, A. Gerardin, L. Lellouch, K.K. Szabo, B.C. Toth and C. Zimmermann, Hadronic light-by-light scattering contribution to the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon at the physical pion mass , Phys. Rev. D 111 (2025) 114509 [ 2411.11719]

2025 arXiv
[49]

Bardeen and W.K

W.A. Bardeen and W.K. Tung, Invariant amplitudes for photon processes, Phys. Rev. 173 (1968) 1423

1968
[51]

Colangelo, M

G. Colangelo, M. Hoferichter, M. Procura and P. Stoffer, Dispersion relation for hadronic light-by-light scattering: theoretical foundations , JHEP 09 (2015) 074 [1506.01386]

2015 arXiv
[52]

L¨ udtke, M

J. L¨ udtke, M. Procura and P. Stoffer,Dispersion relations for hadronic light-by-light scattering in triangle kinematics, JHEP 04 (2023) 125 [ 2302.12264]

2023 arXiv
[53]

L¨ udtke, M

J. L¨ udtke, M. Procura and P. Stoffer,Dispersion relations for the hadronic VV A correlator, JHEP 04 (2025) 130 [ 2410.11946]

2025 arXiv
[54]

Hoferichter and P

M. Hoferichter and P. Stoffer, Asymptotic behavior of meson transition form factors , JHEP 05 (2020) 159 [2004.06127]

2020 arXiv
[55]

Bijnens, N

J. Bijnens, N. Hermansson-Truedsson, L. Laub and A. Rodr ´ ıguez-S´ anchez,Short-distance HLbL contributions to the muon anomalous magnetic moment beyond perturbation theory, JHEP 10 (2020) 203 [2008.13487]

2020 arXiv
[56]

Bijnens, N

J. Bijnens, N. Hermansson-Truedsson, L. Laub and A. Rodr ´ ıguez-S´ anchez,The two-loop perturbative correction to the (g − 2)µ HLbL at short distances , JHEP 04 (2021) 240 [ 2101.09169]

2021 arXiv
[57]

Sakai and S

T. Sakai and S. Sugimoto, Low energy hadron physics in holographic QCD, Prog. Theor. Phys. 113 (2005) 843 [hep-th/0412141]

2005 arXiv
[58]

Erlich, E

J. Erlich, E. Katz, D.T. Son and M.A. Stephanov, QCD and a holographic model of hadrons , Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 (2005) 261602 [ hep-ph/0501128]

2005 arXiv
[59]

Da Rold and A

L. Da Rold and A. Pomarol, Chiral symmetry breaking from five-dimensional spaces, Nucl. Phys. B 721 (2005) 79 [hep-ph/0501218]

2005 arXiv
[60]

Hirn and V

J. Hirn and V. Sanz, Interpolating between low and high energy QCD via a 5-D Yang-Mills model , JHEP 12 (2005) 030 [ hep-ph/0507049]

2005 arXiv
[61]

Karch, E

A. Karch, E. Katz, D.T. Son and M.A. Stephanov, Linear confinement and AdS/QCD , Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 015005 [ hep-ph/0602229]

2006 arXiv
[62]

Maldacena, The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity , Int

J.M. Maldacena, The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity , Int. J. Theor. Phys. 38 (1999) 1113 [ hep-th/9711200]

1999 arXiv
[63]

Gubser, I.R

S.S. Gubser, I.R. Klebanov and A.M. Polyakov, Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory , Phys. Lett. B 428 (1998) 105 [ hep-th/9802109]

1998 arXiv
[64]

Witten, Anti-de Sitter space and holography , Adv

E. Witten, Anti-de Sitter space and holography , Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 253 [ hep-th/9802150]

1998 arXiv
[65]

Landau, On the angular momentum of a system of two photons , Dokl

L.D. Landau, On the angular momentum of a system of two photons , Dokl. Akad. Nauk Ser. Fiz. 60 (1948) 207

1948
[67]

E. Katz, A. Lewandowski and M.D. Schwartz, Tensor mesons in AdS/QCD , Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 086004 [hep-ph/0510388]

2006 arXiv
[68]

Mamedov, Z

S. Mamedov, Z. Hashimli and S. Jafarzade, Tensor meson couplings in AdS/QCD , Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 114032 [ 2308.12392]

2023 arXiv
[69]

Schuler, F.A

G.A. Schuler, F.A. Berends and R. van Gulik, Meson photon transition form-factors and resonance cross-sections in e+ e- collisions , Nucl. Phys. B 523 (1998) 423 [ hep-ph/9710462]

1998 arXiv
[70]

Cappiello, J

L. Cappiello, J. Leutgeb, J. Mager and A. Rebhan, Tensor meson transition form factors in holographic QCD and the muon g − 2, JHEP 07 (2025) 033 [2501.09699]

2025 arXiv
[71]

Lepage and S.J

G.P. Lepage and S.J. Brodsky, Exclusive Processes in 8 Quantum Chromodynamics: Evolution Equations for Hadronic Wave Functions and the Form-Factors of Mesons, Phys. Lett. B 87 (1979) 359

1979
[72]

Brodsky and G.P

S.J. Brodsky and G.P. Lepage, Large Angle Two Photon Exclusive Channels in Quantum Chromodynamics , Phys. Rev. D 24 (1981) 1808

1981

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [66]

Yang, Selection Rules for the Dematerialization of a Particle Into Two Photons , Phys

C.-N. Yang, Selection Rules for the Dematerialization of a Particle Into Two Photons , Phys. Rev. 77 (1950) 242

work page 1950

[2] [50]

Tarrach, Invariant Amplitudes for Virtual Compton Scattering Off Polarized Nucleons Free from Kinematical Singularities, Zeros and Constraints , Nuovo Cim

R. Tarrach, Invariant Amplitudes for Virtual Compton Scattering Off Polarized Nucleons Free from Kinematical Singularities, Zeros and Constraints , Nuovo Cim. A 28 (1975) 409

work page 1975

[3] [1]

Muon g − 2 collaboration, Measurement of the Positive Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment to 0.20 ppm , Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 (2023) 161802 [ 2308.06230]

arXiv 2023

[4] [2]

Muon g − 2 collaboration, Detailed report on the measurement of the positive muon anomalous magnetic moment to 0.20 ppm , Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) 032009 [2402.15410]

arXiv 2024

[5] [3]

which needs further scrutiny and improvements re- garding its main source of uncertainties to match this precision. At present, the main uncertainty arises from discrepancies in the contribution from hadronic vacuum polarization [4], for which new lattice QCD results [5–12] hold the promise of a more precise evaluation while also removing most of the devi...

work page 2020

[6] [4]

= (−Q2 1, −Q2 2, −Q2 1 − 2Q1Q2τ − Q2 2, 0) . (5) Isolating single resonance exchange contributions to the ¯Πi in terms of their TFFs is a nontrivial task, which has recently been extended to spin-1 and spin-2 reso- nances using a new optimized basis [39]. In the case of tensor meson exchanges, the absence of kinematic sin- gularities is however given only...

work page

[7] [5]

Bors´ anyi et al.,Leading hadronic contribution to the muon magnetic moment from lattice QCD , Nature 593 (2021) 51 [ 2002.12347]

S. Bors´ anyi et al.,Leading hadronic contribution to the muon magnetic moment from lattice QCD , Nature 593 (2021) 51 [ 2002.12347]

arXiv 2021

[8] [6]

C` e et al.,Window observable for the hadronic vacuum polarization contribution to the muon g − 2 from lattice QCD , Phys

M. C` e et al.,Window observable for the hadronic vacuum polarization contribution to the muon g − 2 from lattice QCD , Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) 114502 [2206.06582]

arXiv 2022