Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 4 cited by

A Spectroscopically Calibrated Prescription for Extracting PAH Flux from JWST MIRI Imaging

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper introduces a photometry-only prescription that recovers PAH 7.7 and 11.3 micron flux from JWST MIRI broadband images, with typical agreement of ~7% and ~5% with spectral decomposition.

desk verdict Useful, honest calibration paper; the headline ~7%/~5% accuracy is in-sample residual scatter, so treat it as calibration performance until an independent validation appears. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.19397 v1 pith:5OM2XJZO submitted 2025-01-31 astro-ph.GA

Grant P. Donnelly , Thomas S.-Y. Lai , Lee Armus , Tanio Díaz-Santos , Kirsten L. Larson , Loreto Barcos-Muñoz , Marina Bianchin , Thomas Bohn
show 19 more authors
Torsten Böker Victorine A. Buiten Vassilis Charmandaris Aaron S. Evans Justin Howell Hanae Inami Darshan Kakkad Laura Lenkić Sean T. Linden Cristina M. Lofaro Matthew A. Malkan Anne M. Medling George C. Privon Claudio Ricci J.D.T. Smith Yiqing Song Sabrina Stierwalt Paul P. van der Werf Vivian U
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords PAHfluxJWSTMIRIimagingsyntheticphotometryspectraldecompositionluminousinfraredgalaxiessilicateabsorptionstarformationtracersmid-infraredcontinuum
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) trace the radiation field and star formation in galaxies, but mapping their 7.7 and 11.3 micron features normally requires slow integral-field spectroscopy. This paper argues that the same fluxes can be recovered from JWST MIRI broadband images alone, with accuracy comparable to the spectral fits themselves: within about 7% for the 7.7 micron complex and 5% for the 11.3 micron complex. The recipe anchors a power-law pseudo-continuum between two continuum-dominated MIRI filters, subtracts it from the PAH-dominated band, and applies constants calibrated on 267 MIRI/MRS spectra from four luminous infrared galaxies. If the calibration transfers, PAH flux maps over fields of view more than 100 times larger than the MIRI integral-field unit become routine, enabling resolved studies of PAH grain size and ionization across whole galaxies.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the spectroscopically calibrated photometric identity $F_{\mathrm{PAH},b'} = 10^{-26}\nu_{b'} w_{b'} c_{\mathrm{PAH}} c_{\mathrm{wing}} (f_{b'} - g_{\mathrm{cont}} f_{\mathrm{blue}}^{(1-\alpha)} f_{\mathrm{red}}^{\alpha})$, where the power-law pseudo-continuum $f_{\mathrm{blue}}^{(1-\alpha)} f_{\mathrm{red}}^{\alpha}$ estimates the local mid-infrared continuum from two continuum-dominated MIRI bands, $g_{\mathrm{cont}}$ is the median ratio of the spectrally fitted continuum to that pseudo-continuum in the PAH band, and the three dimensionless constants convert filter flux density into integrated PAH-complex flux. The power-law construction is what allows broadband images to stand in for spectroscopy; the $g_{\mathrm{cont}}$ calibration removes the systematic offset between a featureless power law and the true dust continuum; and for PAH 11.3 the additional silicate-strength term handles the 9.7 micron absorption feature that would otherwise bias the blue anchor.

What would settle it

Compare the prescription's PAH 7.7 and 11.3 micron fluxes against MIRI/MRS spectral fits for nearby galaxies outside the calibration set, especially low-metallicity dwarfs and AGN-dominated nuclei; a median absolute percent difference above about 7% or 5%, or a trend in the residuals with silicate strength or spectral slope, would show the calibration is sample-specific.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that the observed integrated fluxes of the 7.7 and 11.3 micron PAH complexes can be recovered from JWST MIRI broadband imaging with typical agreement of about 7% and 5%, respectively, compared with values from detailed spectral decomposition, matching the roughly 5% uncertainty of the spectroscopic fits themselves. The recommended filter combinations are F560W, F770W, and either F1500W or F2100W for the 7.7 micron complex, and F560W, F1000W, F1130W, and F1500W for the 11.3 micron complex. The method models the underlying continuum as a power law anchored in continuum-dominated bands, subtracts a median-calibrated version of that power law from the PAH-dominated band, and applies constants accounting for the filter width, the fraction of the PAH complex inside the band, and power lost outside the filter through the broad wings of the PAH profiles. For strongly silicate-absorbed regions the prescription adds a photometric estimate of silicate strength and replaces the blue continuum anchor with an absorption-corrected 10 micron flux.

Load-bearing premise

The whole recipe depends on the assumption that the median correction between a simple power law and the true mid-infrared spectrum, measured in four bright merging galaxies, works for any other galaxy; if that offset is different elsewhere, the claimed 5-7 percent accuracy will not transfer.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • MIRI imaging alone can produce PAH 7.7 and 11.3 micron flux maps over fields of view more than 100 times larger than the MIRI integral-field unit, at the same spatial resolution, without spending the observing time needed for spectral mapping.
  • The recommended filter combinations recover PAH flux at roughly the same accuracy as the spectral fits themselves, so resolved PAH ratios can be mapped across whole galaxies to trace grain size and ionization state.
  • For local-universe targets the method degrades predictably with redshift: PAH 7.7 flux is under-recovered by about 2% at z=0.01, 7% at z=0.03, and 8-16% at z=0.06, while PAH 11.3 stays within about 2.5% only until z is near 0.015.
  • Combining these maps with PAH 3.3 micron flux from NIRCam photometry yields spatially resolved probes of PAH grain size and ionization over large areas of nearby galaxies.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the continuum-correction transferability assumption holds, the prescription can be tested immediately on archival MIRI imaging of nearby galaxies that already have MIRI/MRS spectra, without any new observations.
  • Because the calibration set covers only four luminous infrared galaxies, the claimed 5-7% accuracy may not extend to low-metallicity dwarfs or strongly AGN-dominated regions; recomputing the constants on such spectra would quantify any drift.
  • The same power-law-and-correction structure could plausibly be adapted to other PAH-dominated MIRI bands, such as F1280W for the 12.6 micron feature, though the silicate absorption treatment would need to be re-derived there.
  • The silicate-strength cutoff and the exponential relation used in the absorption correction are tuned to this sample; applying the formula to more heavily obscured systems would test whether those relations are universal or specific to the calibration galaxies.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper introduces a photometric prescription for extracting PAH 7.7 and 11.3 micron fluxes from JWST MIRI broadband imaging. Using 267 MIRI/MRS spectra from four GOALS LIRGs, the authors derive synthetic MIRI filter photometry, estimate a power-law pseudo-continuum anchored in continuum-dominated bands, and apply empirically calibrated constants (w_b', c_PAH, c_wing, and a continuum correction g_cont) to convert photometric excesses into PAH complex fluxes. They compare the photometric estimates with fluxes from CAFE spectral decomposition and report typical agreements of about 7% for PAH 7.7 and about 5% for PAH 11.3, after applying a silicate-strength-dependent correction for the 11.3 micron complex.

Significance. If the claimed accuracy holds beyond the calibration sample, the prescription would be practically valuable: MIRI imaging offers a much larger field of view and higher sensitivity to faint extended emission than MRS IFU maps, so the method would enable high-resolution PAH flux maps across entire galaxies. The paper is transparent about its methods: the constants are physically motivated, the synthetic-photometry procedure is clearly specified, and the dependence of performance on six filter combinations is tabulated. The explicit silicate correction and the redshift-sensitivity test are useful additions. The main limitation is that the headline accuracy figures are measured on the same spectra used to calibrate g_cont, the Eq. 8 coefficients, and the S_sil cutoff, so they are in-sample residuals rather than out-of-sample predictions; the transferability of the calibration to other galaxy populations is asserted but not demonstrated.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4.2, Table 2, Figure 5] The reported ~7% and ~5% accuracies are in-sample residuals, not independent predictive errors. The correction g_cont in Table 2 is defined as the median ratio of the CAFE continuum to the power-law pseudo-continuum over the same 267 spectra that are then used to compute the 'Cal.' columns and Figure 5. Applying a sample median as a correction necessarily centers the percent-difference distribution near zero and reduces the IQR by construction. To support the abstract claim that the prescription 'yields predicted flux densities' with this accuracy, the authors should provide a leave-one-galaxy-out or split-half cross-validation, or an application to independent MIRI imaging plus spectroscopy, and report the resulting residuals and the stability of the fitted constants.
  2. [§5, Eqs. 7–8, Figure 6] The improved PAH 11.3 prescription is tuned on the same calibration sample: the coefficients in Eq. 8 come from a fit to the 267 spectra, and the S_sil,phot < −0.6 switch is chosen by testing cutoffs between −2.5 and 0 and selecting the best performer on this sample. Therefore the quoted ~5% accuracy with the combined Eq. 6/Eq. 8 procedure is a selected in-sample result, and the extent to which the threshold and coefficients generalize is unknown. A cross-validation scheme that treats the cutoff selection as part of the fitting procedure is needed before the accuracy can be claimed as predictive.
  3. [§4.2, §5, Table 2] The transferability of g_cont and the silicate correction to galaxies outside the calibration sample is the central untested assumption. The sample consists of four GOALS LIRGs spanning SFR densities 0.1–3.1 Msun/yr/kpc^2 and S_sil from −2.77 to 0.23, but normal star-forming galaxies, low-metallicity systems, and regions with different dust temperatures or PAH fractions may have a different offset between the power-law pseudo-continuum and the true continuum. The redshift test in §5 shifts only three spectra in wavelength and does not change the underlying continuum shape or environment, so it does not test environmental transferability. I would like to see a concrete test, for example applying the prescription to archival MIRI imaging plus MRS data of nearby non-LIRG galaxies, or an explicit analysis of residual scatter against S_sil, SFR density, and metallicity within the present sample.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Table 2] The filter label 'F0560W' appears in several rows and in the table header; it should be 'F560W'.
  2. [§4.2] The sentence 'Thus, we artifically set gcont = 1 for these combinbations in Table 2' contains typos ('artifically', 'combinbations') and should read 'artificially' and 'combinations'; nearby text also has 'discusssed'.
  3. [§5] The sentence reporting improved accuracy for low-to-moderate absorption gives the format as '−3.6 (−1.6, −5.6)%'; if these are median followed by quartiles, the quartile order appears reversed, and the convention should be clarified.
  4. [§4.2, Fig. 4 caption] Figure 4's caption states g_cont = 0.86 and 0.88 for the two F1000W-anchored PAH 11.3 combinations, while Table 2 lists g_cont = 1 for those combinations with a dagger. The relationship between the tabulated values and the values used in Figures 4 and 5 should be explained consistently.
  5. [§5] The artificial-redshift test is applied to only three spectra; the text should state which spectra were used and how representative they are of the sample, since the resulting redshift limits may depend on the chosen continuum and silicate strengths.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The headline ~7% and ~5% accuracies are in-sample residuals from calibrating g_cont, Eq. 8, and the S_sil,phot cutoff on the same 267 spectra, so the central 'prediction' claim is partly forced by construction.

  1. fitted input called prediction [§4.2, Table 2, §5, Abstract]
    "This is done by finding the median relative offset between the value of the inferred continuum at the fiducial wavelength of a PAH-dominated band, and the synthetic photometry of the featureless CAFE fitted continuum in that band. ... the continuum correction gcont is reported for each filter combination as the median ratio of the continuum from CAFE to the photometric psuedo-continuum computed from all spectra in our sample. ..."

    g_cont is defined as a sample-median ratio over the same 267 spectra that are later used to report the 'Cal.' residuals in Table 2 and the ~7%/~5% accuracies in §5 and the Abstract. Applying a sample-median correction necessarily removes the systematic offset in that sample, so the quoted agreement is an in-sample residual after subtracting a sample-specific offset, not an out-of-sample prediction.

  2. fitted input called prediction [§5, Eq. 8, Figure 6]
    "Testing Ssil, phot cutoffs between -2.5 and 0, we find that Eq. 8 performs better than Eq. 6 when there is significant absorption of Ssil, phot < −0.6. ... When Eq. 6 and Eq. 8 are used in tandem to estimate PAH 11.3µm for sources with Ssil, phot > −0.6 and < −0.6, respectively, the median and IQR percent differences with CAFE across all regions in our sample are −0.3, (−4.2, 4.3)% for Red:F1500W and 2, (−5.0, 10.5)% for Red:F2100W."

    The S_sil,phot threshold and the coefficients of Eq. 8 are selected by scanning cutoffs and fitting on the same full sample. The reported median and IQR percent differences are therefore the in-sample performance of the tuned rule, so the PAH 11.3 µm accuracy claim is partly forced by selection on the same data rather than by independent validation.

full rationale

The paper builds a genuinely useful calibration procedure: filter combinations are ranked, c_PAH and c_wing are physically motivated spectral-fraction constants, and the redshift test does probe wavelength-shift behavior. However, the central claim that the prescription 'yields predicted flux densities that typically agree with values from spectral decomposition within ~7% and ~5%' is evaluated on the very spectra used to set g_cont, Eq. 8, and the S_sil,phot = -0.6 cutoff. No independent or held-out sample is used to verify transferability to other galaxies or environments; the redshift test only shifts three of the same spectra in wavelength. This is a partial circularity of the 'fitted input called prediction' kind, not a definitional equivalence or a self-citation chain. The correct reading is that the paper demonstrates in-sample calibration quality, while the out-of-sample accuracy for new targets remains an untested assumption.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The prescription depends on several empirically calibrated constants (w_b', c_PAH, c_wing, g_cont, and the Eq. 8 coefficients) that are fitted to the same spectra used for validation. It also relies on domain assumptions: the power-law continuum representation, the representativeness of the GOALS LIRG sample, the equivalence of synthetic and real MIRI photometry, and the stability of c_PAH and c_wing across environments. No new entities are introduced.

free parameters (7)
  • w_b' = 0.271 (F770W), 0.066 (F1130W)
    Fitted as the median ratio in Eq. 3 from CAFE fits; converts photometric flux density to integrated PAH flux within the PAH-dominated band.
  • c_PAH = 0.74 ± 0.01 (7.7), 0.87 ± 0.02 (11.3)
    Median fractional power of the PAH complex of interest within the band, derived from CAFE fits to all spectra.
  • c_wing = 1.15 ± 0.01 (7.7), 1.16 ± 0.01 (11.3)
    Median wing-loss correction, derived from CAFE fits to all spectra.
  • g_cont = Six values in Table 2, e.g., 0.68 for F560W+F1500W at 7.7 microns
    Median continuum correction per filter combination, calibrated on the same 267 spectra used for validation.
  • Eq. 8 coefficients = 0.94, 1.20, -0.08, -0.12
    Exponential fit to the Ssil,phot versus fSpec,10/fCont,10 relation (Figure 6 left); no uncertainties reported.
  • Ssil,phot cutoff = -0.6
    Chosen by scanning from -2.5 to 0 on the calibration sample to decide when Eq. 8 outperforms Eq. 6; post hoc selection.
  • Ssil = 1.29 Ssil,phot + 0.24 relation = 1.29, 0.24
    Linear fit between photometric and spectral silicate strengths, used to interpret the cutoff; r=0.99 on the sample.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption A single power law can represent the continuum between two anchor bands.
    Invoked in Eq. 1 and §3.1; the real continuum includes silicate absorption and PAH wings, which are handled separately through g_cont and the silicate correction.
  • domain assumption The CAFE spectral decomposition provides unbiased PAH fluxes.
    CAFE is the reference for all comparisons; any systematic error in CAFE propagates into the calibration (Marshall et al. 2007; Diaz-Santos et al., in prep.).
  • domain assumption c_PAH and c_wing are approximately constant across environments.
    The authors report variation of ≲2% for c_PAH and ~1% for c_wing within the GOALS sample, but extrapolating to other galaxy types assumes this stability.
  • domain assumption Synthetic photometry from MRS spectra equals real MIRI imaging photometry.
    Stated in §2; the calibration is not tested on actual imaging data, so PSF and aperture differences between the IFU and imager are assumed negligible.
  • domain assumption The four GOALS LIRGs are representative of the intended user population.
    g_cont and the silicate correction are calibrated on this sample and then recommended for general use (§5).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Spectroscopically Calibrated Prescription for Extracting PAH Flux from JWST MIRI Imaging." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5OM2XJZO

@misc{pith2026250119397,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Spectroscopically Calibrated Prescription for Extracting PAH Flux from JWST MIRI Imaging},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5OM2XJZO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.19397}
}
read the original abstract

We introduce a prescription for estimating the flux of the 7.7 micron and 11.3 micron\ polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) features from broadband JWST/MIRI images. Probing PAH flux with MIRI imaging data has advantages in field of view, spatial resolution, and sensitivity compared with MIRI spectral maps, but comparisons with spectra are needed to calibrate these flux estimations over a wide variety of environments. For 267 MIRI/MRS spectra from independent regions in the four luminous infrared galaxies (LIRGs) in the Great Observatories All-sky LIRG Survey (GOALS) early release science program, we derive synthetic filter photometry and directly compare estimated PAH fluxes to those measured from detailed spectral fits. We find that for probing PAH 7.7 micron, the best combination of filters is F560W, F770W, and either F1500W or F2100W, and the best for PAH 11.3 micron is F560W, F1000W, F1130W, and F1500W. The prescription with these combinations yields predicted flux densities that typically agree with values from spectral decomposition within ~7% and ~5% for PAH 7.7 and 11.3 micron, respectively.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.19397 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. An example rest-frame MIRI/MRS spectrum from a region within VV114. The maximum flux values have been truncated for clarity. The blue line shows the CAFE-fit contribution from the two PAH features discussed in this work, and the solid red line is the CAFE-fit continuum. Filled circles indicate the value of the synthetic photometry for each MIRI filter, shown as shaded areas. The dashed red line shows an example powe… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Comparisons between inferred photometric PAH flux and PAH feature strength measured from the JWST spectra with CAFE for various combinations of JWST/MIRI filters using Eq. 4. Characteristics of the distribution expressed as a percent difference from the CAFE values are shown, with the medians as blue lines, the 25th and 75th percentiles as the left and right of each gray box, respectively, and the horizontal black l… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The percentage differences between PAH flux as estimated by Eq. 4 and as fit with CAFE for PAH 7.7 µm (left) and PAH 11.3 µm (right). Colored points indicate individual spectra in our sample. The horizontal black line indicates a perfect match between photometrically and spectroscopically derived PAH fluxes. These filter combinations, indicated at the top of each panel, yield the most accurate results when a spectro… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Left: the relationship between the photometrically-inferred silicate absorption strength Ssil,phot and the spectral flux density at 10 µm (fSpec,10) relative to the 10 µm power law continuum anchored at F560W and F1500W (ex. red dashed line in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Photometric Mapping of Carbonaceous/Siliceous Dust and Water Ice in the ISM with JWST: Applications to the Dense Sightlines

    astro-ph.IM 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Three-band JWST photometry recovers optical depths of the 3.0 micron water ice and 10 micron silicate absorption features with roughly 15-30% accuracy, enabling wide-field maps of dust and ice in the interstellar medium.

  2. JWST interferometric imaging reveals the dusty disk obscuring the supermassive black hole of the Circinus galaxy

    astro-ph.GA 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    JWST aperture-masking images of Circinus show a 2x5 pc dust component along the torus funnel, a <1% outflow arc, and NIR holes where the equatorial disk blocks light, supporting a disk-fed AGN.

  3. JWST Observations of Starbursts: Relations between PAH features and CO clouds in the starburst galaxy M 82

    astro-ph.GA 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In the starburst galaxy M 82, CO-to-PAH scaling relations measured on 306 molecular clouds have shallower slopes than in main-sequence spiral galaxies.

  4. Spatial Correlations of PAH, UV, H$\alpha$ Emission and IMF - PAH Variations in the Star-Forming Complexes of NGC 628

    astro-ph.GA 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    In NGC 628 SFCs, PAH luminosities track UV/Hα, and PAH band ratios increase toward top-heavy, bluer complexes, with flatter spur trends and shell-vs-shear IMF differences near the phantom void.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages · cited by 4 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    J., Tielens, A

    Allamandola, L. J., Tielens, A. G. G. M., & Barker, J. R. 1985, ApJL, 290, L25, doi: 10.1086/184435 —. 1989, ApJS, 71, 733, doi: 10.1086/191396

    doi:10.1086/184435 1985

  2. [2]

    M., Evans, A

    Armus, L., Mazzarella, J. M., Evans, A. S., et al. 2009, PASP, 121, 559, doi: 10.1086/600092 Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T. P., Tollerud, E. J., et al. 2013, A&A, 558, A33, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Sip˝ ocz, B. M., et al. 2018, AJ, 156, 123, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f Astropy Collaboration, Pri...

    doi:10.1086/600092 2009

  3. [3]

    GOALS-JWST: The Warm Molecular Outflows of the Merging Starburst Galaxy NGC 3256

    Bohn, T., Inami, H., Togi, A., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2403.14751, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2403.14751

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2403.14751 2024

  4. [4]

    D., Levy, R

    Bolatto, A. D., Levy, R. C., Tarantino, E., et al. 2024, ApJ, 967, 63, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad33c8

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad33c8 2024

  5. [5]

    2023a, ApJL, 944, L12, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acac94 —

    Chastenet, J., Sutter, J., Sandstrom, K., et al. 2023a, ApJL, 944, L12, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acac94 —. 2023b, ApJL, 944, L11, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acadd7

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acac94

  6. [6]

    2024a, A&A, 685, A75, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346662

    Chown, R., Sidhu, A., Peeters, E., et al. 2024a, A&A, 685, A75, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346662

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346662

  7. [7]

    2024b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2411.06061, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2411.06061 D ´ ıaz-Santos, T., Alonso-Herrero, A., Colina, L., et al

    Chown, R., Okada, Y., Peeters, E., et al. 2024b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2411.06061, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2411.06061 D ´ ıaz-Santos, T., Alonso-Herrero, A., Colina, L., et al. 2010, ApJ, 711, 328, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/711/1/328

    arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2411.06061 2010

  8. [8]

    P., Smith, J

    Donnelly, G. P., Smith, J. D. T., Draine, B. T., et al. 2024, ApJ, 965, 75, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad2169

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad2169 2024

Show all 46 references
  1. [9]

    T., & Li, A

    Draine, B. T., & Li, A. 2001, ApJ, 551, 807, doi: 10.1086/320227 —. 2007, ApJ, 657, 810, doi: 10.1086/511055

    2001 doi

  2. [10]

    T., Li, A., Hensley, B

    Draine, B. T., Li, A., Hensley, B. S., et al. 2021, ApJ, 917, 3, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abff51

    2021 doi

  3. [11]

    V., Kreckel, K., Sandstrom, K

    Egorov, O. V., Kreckel, K., Sandstrom, K. M., et al. 2023, ApJL, 944, L16, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acac92

    2023 doi

  4. [12]

    S., Frayer, D

    Evans, A. S., Frayer, D. T., Charmandaris, V., et al. 2022, ApJL, 940, L8, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac9971

    2022 doi

  5. [13]

    H., Bauwens, E., et al

    Glasse, A., Rieke, G. H., Bauwens, E., et al. 2015, PASP, 127, 686, doi: 10.1086/682259

    2015 doi

  6. [14]

    D., Bohlin, R., Sloan, G

    Gordon, K. D., Bohlin, R., Sloan, G. C., et al. 2022, AJ, 163, 267, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ac66dc

    2022 doi

  7. [15]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2405.09667, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2405.09667

    Gregg, B., Calzetti, D., Adamo, A., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2405.09667, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2405.09667

    2024 doi arXiv

  8. [16]

    2011, ApJS, 197, 27, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/197/2/27

    Haan, S., Armus, L., Laine, S., et al. 2011, ApJS, 197, 27, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/197/2/27

    2011 doi

  9. [17]

    R., Millman, K

    Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., et al. 2020, Nature, 585, 357, doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2

    2020 doi

  10. [18]

    Hunter, J. D. 2007, Computing in Science & Engineering, 9, 90, doi: 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55

    2007 doi

  11. [19]

    2018, A&A, 617, A130, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833053

    Inami, H., Armus, L., Matsuhara, H., et al. 2018, A&A, 617, A130, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833053

    2018 doi

  12. [20]

    J., H¨ onig, S

    Jensen, J. J., H¨ onig, S. F., Rakshit, S., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 470, 3071, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx1447

    2017 doi

  13. [21]

    J., & Tielens, A

    Kemper, F., Vriend, W. J., & Tielens, A. G. G. M. 2004, ApJ, 609, 826, doi: 10.1086/421339

    2004 doi

  14. [22]

    2003, PASP, 115, 928, doi: 10.1086/376941

    Kennicutt, Robert C., J., Armus, L., Bendo, G., et al. 2003, PASP, 115, 928, doi: 10.1086/376941

    2003 doi

  15. [23]

    1986, Highlights of Astronomy, 7, 833 12

    Turnshek, D. 1986, Highlights of Astronomy, 7, 833 12

    1986

  16. [24]

    Lai, T. S. Y., Smith, J. D. T., Baba, S., Spoon, H. W. W., & Imanishi, M. 2020, ApJ, 905, 55, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abc002

    2020 doi

  17. [25]

    Lai, T. S. Y., Smith, J. D. T., Peeters, E., et al. 2024, ApJ, 967, 83, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad354b

    2024 doi

  18. [26]

    Lai, T. S. Y., Armus, L., U, V., et al. 2022, ApJL, 941, L36, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac9ebf

    2022 doi

  19. [27]

    C., Ward, M

    Landt, H., Bentz, M. C., Ward, M. J., et al. 2008, ApJS, 174, 282, doi: 10.1086/522373

    2008 doi

  20. [28]

    Law, D. R., E. Morrison, J., Argyriou, I., et al. 2023, AJ, 166, 45, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/acdddc

    2023 doi

  21. [29]

    Leger, A., & Puget, J. L. 1984, A&A, 137, L5

    1984

  22. [30]

    R., Engelbracht, C

    Marble, A. R., Engelbracht, C. W., van Zee, L., et al. 2010, ApJ, 715, 506, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/715/1/506

    2010 doi

  23. [31]

    A., Herter, T

    Marshall, J. A., Herter, T. L., Armus, L., et al. 2007, ApJ, 670, 129, doi: 10.1086/521588

    2007 doi

  24. [32]

    2024, A&A, 689, A79, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202449454

    Matsumoto, K., Hirashita, H., Nagamine, K., et al. 2024, A&A, 689, A79, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202449454

    2024 doi

  25. [33]

    Narayanan, D., Smith, J. D. T., Hensley, B. S., et al. 2023, ApJ, 951, 100, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/accf8d O’Dowd, M. J., Schiminovich, D., Johnson, B. D., et al. 2009, ApJ, 705, 885, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/705/1/885

    2023 doi

  26. [34]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2406.01666, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2406.01666

    Pedrini, A., Adamo, A., Calzetti, D., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2406.01666, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2406.01666

    2024 doi arXiv

  27. [35]

    Peeters, E., Spoon, H. W. W., & Tielens, A. G. G. M. 2004, ApJ, 613, 986, doi: 10.1086/423237

    2004 doi

  28. [36]

    M., Bolatto, A

    Sandstrom, K. M., Bolatto, A. D., Bot, C., et al. 2012, ApJ, 744, 20, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/744/1/20

    2012 doi

  29. [37]

    M., Chastenet, J., Sutter, J., et al

    Sandstrom, K. M., Chastenet, J., Sutter, J., et al. 2023, ApJL, 944, L7, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acb0cf

    2023 doi

  30. [38]

    V., Papovich, C., Rieke, G

    Shipley, H. V., Papovich, C., Rieke, G. H., Brown, M. J. I., & Moustakas, J. 2016, ApJ, 818, 60, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/818/1/60

    2016 doi

  31. [39]

    Smith, J. D. T., Draine, B. T., Dale, D. A., et al. 2007, ApJ, 656, 770, doi: 10.1086/510549

    2007 doi

  32. [40]

    Spoon, H. W. W., Marshall, J. A., Houck, J. R., et al. 2007, ApJL, 654, L49, doi: 10.1086/511268

    2007 doi

  33. [41]

    2014, ApJ, 790, 124, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/790/2/124

    Stierwalt, S., Armus, L., Charmandaris, V., et al. 2014, ApJ, 790, 124, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/790/2/124

    2014 doi

  34. [42]

    I., Sellgren, K., Werner, M

    Uchida, K. I., Sellgren, K., Werner, M. W., & Houdashelt, M. L. 2000, ApJ, 530, 817, doi: 10.1086/308379

    2000 doi

  35. [43]

    E., et al

    Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T. E., et al. 2020, Nature Methods, 17, 261, doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2

    2020 doi

  36. [44]

    M., Sandstrom, K., Murphy, E

    Whitcomb, C. M., Sandstrom, K., Murphy, E. J., & Linden, S. 2020, ApJ, 901, 47, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abaef6

    2020 doi

  37. [45]

    M., Smith, J

    Whitcomb, C. M., Smith, J. D. T., Sandstrom, K., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2405.09685, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2405.09685

    2024 doi arXiv

  38. [46]

    C., Li, A., & Shangguan, J

    Xie, Y., Ho, L. C., Li, A., & Shangguan, J. 2018, ApJ, 860, 154, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aac3dc

    2018 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.