REVIEW 1 cited by
Benchmarking Quantum Instruments
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Quantum measurements with feed-forward are crucial components of fault-tolerant quantum computers. We show how the error rate of such a measurement can be directly estimated by fitting the probability that successive randomly compiled measurements all return the ideal outcome. Unlike conventional randomized benchmarking experiments and alternative measurement characterization protocols, all the data can be obtained using a single sufficiently large number of successive measurements. We also prove that generalized Pauli fidelities are invariant under randomized compiling and can be combined with the error rate to characterize the underlying errors up to a gauge transformation that introduces an ambiguity between errors happening before or after measurements.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Readout sweet spots for spin qubits with strong spin-orbit interaction
Readout back-action in spin qubits from g-tensor modulation is minimized when the magnetic field is oriented so the static Zeeman field is parallel to the sensor-induced Zeeman fluctuation (gB parallel to g'B), a cond...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.