Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

Segment Anything for Histopathology

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read PathoSAM, a vision foundation model built by finetuning the Segment Anything Model on six H&E-stained nucleus datasets, claims state-of-the-art automatic and interactive nucleus instance segmentation in histopathology.

desk verdict A useful, well-engineered SAM-for-histopathology model with a broad evaluation; the SOTA claim is plausible but lacks error bars, and the Lizard/CoNSeP overlap needs checking before the OOD generalization claim can be trusted. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.00408 v2 pith:PXRRT76B submitted 2025-02-01 eess.IV cs.CV

Titus Griebel , Anwai Archit , Constantin Pape This is my paper · ORCID
classification eess.IVcs.CV
keywords segmentanythinghistopathologynucleusinstancesegmentationinteractiveautomaticsemanticvisionfoundationmodelwhole-slideimaging
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

PathoSAM is a vision foundation model for nucleus segmentation in histopathology, trained by finetuning the Segment Anything Model on six H&E-stained nucleus datasets. The paper's central claim is that a single generalist model outperforms specialist models for automatic and interactive nucleus instance segmentation across 12 datasets, including out-of-domain data, and can be finetuned for semantic nucleus segmentation with strong results, though not above the current state-of-the-art CellViT. The intended upshot is that this removes the need to retrain per dataset: one set of weights supports interactive annotation and automatic segmentation on whole slides. The paper's own limitations state that gland and lymphocyte segmentation still require task-specific finetuning, and that automatic quality drops on CryoNuSeg where annotation conventions conflict with the visible nucleus region. If the claims hold, PathoSAM gives pathologists a practical single-model alternative to data-specific retraining.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is joint training of SAM for both interaction and automation. PathoSAM retains SAM's image encoder, prompt encoder, and mask decoder for point, box, and mask prompting, and adds a convolutional decoder that outputs foreground probability, distance to the nearest object center, and distance to the nearest object boundary; seeded watershed converts those maps into instance segmentations. Training alternates between sampling prompts from ground-truth masks and correcting the model's predictions over seven iterations, while the same backbone is simultaneously optimized to reproduce the automatic-segmentation decoder's targets. At inference, the same weights answer a single click or box, refine a mask through further prompts, and run unattended over whole-slide tiles. A separate decoder added on top of the generalist performs semantic nucleus classification, trained with cross-entropy over PanNuke's five classes.

What would settle it

Evaluate PathoSAM on a new H&E dataset whose ground truth was drawn with a deliberately different nucleus convention, such as labeling cytoplasmic extensions or excluding small or overlapping nuclei, and compare automatic mean segmentation accuracy against a specialist model retrained on that dataset. If the generalist does not match or beat the specialist, or if errors concentrate wherever the annotation convention differs, the central generalization claim is falsified. A complementary check is to re-annotate CryoNuSeg to match PathoSAM's nucleus-region convention and see whether the reported quality gap disappears.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, PathoSAM is the new state-of-the-art for automatic and interactive nucleus instance segmentation in histopathology. The model keeps SAM's prompt-driven mask prediction and adds a second decoder that predicts foreground probability and distance maps, which a seeded watershed turns into instance masks; the whole network is trained jointly with an objective that simulates interactive corrections and automatic segmentation on a diverse set of H&E nucleus datasets. In evaluation across 12 datasets, the ViT-L generalist achieves the highest average mean segmentation accuracy among automatic methods, even though for some competing methods the best available model version per dataset was used. For interactive segmentation, PathoSAM outperforms other SAM variants on single point and box prompts and reaches near-perfect accuracy after seven iterative corrections. The paper also reports a semantic segmentation decoder trained on PanNuke that ranks second behind CellViT, with the main shortfall on a rare 'dead cells' class, and a finetuning recipe that yields improved specialist models for lymphocyte and gland segmentation.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the six H&E training datasets share consistent enough nucleus annotation conventions and enough imaging diversity for one model to generalize; the paper itself shows that when annotations disagree with the visible nucleus region, as in CryoNuSeg, automatic segmentation quality collapses.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A single set of PathoSAM weights can replace dataset-specific retraining for nucleus instance segmentation across most H&E histopathology datasets.
  • Interactive annotation in tools such as QuPath and napari requires fewer prompts per nucleus, because point and box prompts already capture nuclei accurately.
  • Whole-slide images can be segmented automatically with tile-and-stitch scripts in under an hour on a GPU, enabling large-scale nucleus analysis.
  • The same finetuning recipe transfers to non-nucleus structures such as lymphocytes and glands when trained on task-specific data.
  • Semantic nucleus segmentation is possible from the same generalist backbone, though on PanNuke it trails CellViT mainly on a minority 'dead cells' class.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If annotation protocols were harmonized across datasets, the out-of-domain failures such as CryoNuSeg could shrink; the paper's own analysis attributes that failure to annotation inconsistency rather than image content alone.
  • The same joint interactive-plus-automatic training recipe may extend to multi-scale segmentation of glands and tissue regions if the model is given scale-aware prompts or multi-scale training, a step the paper identifies as future work.
  • Because PathoSAM's interactive segmentation is near-perfect after a few corrections, it could serve as a pre-annotation engine where human annotators confirm and fix masks instead of drawing nuclei from scratch.
  • A direct test of the semantic-segmentation gap would be to train with minority-class oversampling and joint instance-semantic objectives, which the paper proposes; if the gap to CellViT disappears, the current ranking is a training-strategy artifact rather than an architectural limit.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper introduces PathoSAM, a finetuned variant of the Segment Anything Model (SAM) for nucleus segmentation in histopathology. It supports interactive segmentation from point/box prompts and automatic instance segmentation via an additional decoder with seeded watershed post-processing (AIS), following the microSAM recipe. The authors train generalist ViT-B/L/H models on a combination of six H&E datasets and evaluate on 12 datasets (6 in-domain test splits and 6 out-of-domain), comparing against HoVerNet, StarDist, CellViT, HoVerNeXt, InstanSeg, SAM, and microSAM. They report that PathoSAM is the new state-of-the-art for automatic and interactive nucleus instance segmentation, while for semantic segmentation on PanNuke it ranks second to CellViT. The paper also presents a user study with QuPath and napari integration, whole-slide-image inference scripts, and open-source code and model weights.

Significance. If the results hold, PathoSAM is a practically valuable contribution: a single open-source model that performs automatic and interactive nucleus segmentation across diverse histopathology datasets without per-dataset retraining, with integration into popular annotation tools. The study's strengths include held-out test splits, best-available-version reporting for multi-version baselines, and public code and models. However, the strength of the state-of-the-art claim is currently weakened by the absence of uncertainty estimates or significance tests, and by a potential overlap between the Lizard training data and the CoNSeP out-of-domain evaluation set, which directly bears on the 'unseen dataset' generalization claim.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 2.5 and Table 1] The out-of-domain evaluation may be contaminated by training-data overlap. The Lizard dataset (Graham et al., 2021) is one of the six training datasets, and Lizard is known to be constructed by merging and re-annotating images from existing colorectal datasets, including CoNSeP (Graham et al., 2019), which is later listed among the 'remaining 8 datasets' used for out-of-domain evaluation. The manuscript does not report an image-level or slide-level de-duplication check between the Lizard training split and the CoNSeP test set. If any CoNSeP images or tiles appear in the Lizard training data, then CoNSeP is not 'not directly represented in the training set' as claimed, and the generalization result on CoNSeP is not valid evidence for the 'unseen dataset' claim. The authors must provide a de-duplication analysis (e.g., image hashing or patch matching) and re-run the out-of-domain evaluation excluding any overlapping images, or explicitly state which out-of-domain datasets remain genuinely unseen.
  2. [Section 3.1, Fig. 2a, Fig. 8, App. D.1] All quantitative results are presented as figures with mean scores only; no error bars, standard deviations, or significance tests are reported. The claim that PathoSAM is 'the new state-of-the-art' for automatic nucleus instance segmentation rests on average scores over test sets, and for some comparisons the differences between variants (e.g., ViT-B vs. ViT-L vs. ViT-H) are described as small. Without uncertainty estimates or paired statistical tests on the same test images, the reader cannot assess whether the observed improvements over baselines are meaningful. Please provide numeric tables with per-dataset means and standard deviations (at least across test images), and perform significance tests for the headline comparisons that support the state-of-the-art claim.
  3. [Fig. 10 and App. C] The watershed seed thresholds used in AIS appear to be selected by a grid search on 15 validation images of LyNSeC, an out-of-domain dataset. The manuscript should clarify whether these thresholds were fixed before evaluation on all datasets and whether the LyNSeC validation images are disjoint from the LyNSeC test images. If the thresholds were selected on this out-of-domain validation split and then applied to the same dataset, the reported LyNSeC results are optimistically biased; if the thresholds were applied to other out-of-domain datasets, a sensitivity analysis should be reported to show that the main conclusions do not depend on the exact threshold choice.
  4. [Section 3.2] The interactive segmentation comparison is limited to the original SAM and microSAM. The claim in Section 1 that 'PathoSAM outperforms other SAM variants for interactive segmentation' is broader than the evidence. Please either compare with additional SAM-based methods for histopathology (for example SAM-Path or MedicoSAM) or restrict the claim to the baselines actually evaluated, so that the stated claim matches the experimental scope.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Appendix C] The training iteration counts state '100,00 iterations' for the PanNuke and specialist models; this should read '100,000 iterations'.
  2. [Section 2.2] The sentence 'We evaluate interactive segmentation (for SAM or variants) with AMG and, if available, AIS' is confusing because AMG and AIS are automatic segmentation methods, not interactive ones; it should be rephrased to refer to automatic segmentation.
  3. [Fig. 2 caption] The notation I_P and I_B is used in the caption without a definition; it should be defined in the caption or explained at first use in the main text.
  4. [Section 3.4] The phrase 'ca. 5 GB of VRAM per tile' should be clarified to mean peak VRAM usage during inference on a tile, not persistent per-tile allocation.
  5. [Appendix D.1] The text refers to 'D.1 displays results' without identifying whether D.1 is a table or figure; the cross-reference should be made explicit.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No material circularity: PathoSAM's central claims are empirically evaluated on separate test splits; self-citations to microSAM are independent and non-load-bearing.

full rationale

PathoSAM is an empirical finetuning paper. The central claim, being the new state-of-the-art for automatic and interactive nucleus instance segmentation, is supported by evaluations on held-out test splits of 12 datasets against external methods such as HoVerNet, StarDist, CellViT, HoVerNeXt and InstanSeg. These results are measured, not derived by construction from PathoSAM's training objective or from fitted parameters. The main self-referential component is the adoption of the microSAM training implementation, the additional AIS decoder design, and the interactive evaluation protocol (Sec. 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, App. C). These are citations to an independently published Nature Methods paper by overlapping authors (Archit et al., 2025a); they supply a method and an evaluation scheme, but the state-of-the-art comparison is against external baselines and does not reduce to the cited work. The manuscript also contains honest limitations, stating that PathoSAM does not improve gland or lymphocyte segmentation and that semantic segmentation was only evaluated on a single dataset, which weakens scope claims but does not create circularity. A possible data-leakage concern, that the Lizard training set contains images also appearing in the CoNSeP out-of-domain evaluation, is not established by the manuscript text and would be an empirical correctness issue rather than a circular derivation. Likewise, the watershed-threshold grid search on 15 validation images of LyNSeC (Fig. 10) is a post-processing selection on an OOD validation subset; the paper does not state that the reported test numbers were produced with these tuned thresholds, and even if they were, this is a tuning effect, not a parameter renamed as a prediction. Overall, the derivation chain is self-contained and externally benchmarked, so the circularity score is low.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the representativeness and annotation consistency of the six training datasets, the transferability of SAM and the microSAM objective to histopathology, and the validity of the chosen metric. No new theoretical entities are introduced; the model is an empirical artifact. The most fragile assumption is annotation consistency across datasets, which the authors themselves note is violated in CryoNuSeg.

free parameters (2)
  • AIS watershed seed thresholds (center and boundary) = grid-searched on 15 LyNSeC H&E validation images
    Post-processing thresholds for the seeded watershed in automatic instance segmentation are chosen by grid search on a single out-of-domain validation set, then applied to all datasets, introducing a dataset-specific tuning step (Figure 10).
  • Training hyperparameters (iterations, LR, batch size, objects per image) = 250k iterations, LR 1e-5, batch size 2, 40/30/25 objects per image
    These hand-chosen hyperparameters affect final model quality but are not fitted to the evaluation metric; included for completeness (Appendix C).
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The six H&E-stained training datasets are representative of histopathology nuclei and have sufficiently consistent annotation protocols for joint training.
    The generalist model's broad generalization and SOTA claim depend on this. The paper itself notes annotation inconsistencies in CryoNuSeg (Figure 6), indicating this assumption is not universally satisfied.
  • domain assumption SAM's pretrained weights and the microSAM training objective transfer to histopathology such that joint interactive and automatic training is beneficial.
    The method assumes that the SAM architecture, pretrained on natural images, can be finetuned effectively for nucleus segmentation with the microSAM recipe (Section 2.3).
  • standard math The mean segmentation accuracy metric (averaged over IoU thresholds) is a valid measure of instance segmentation quality for comparing methods.
    The paper uses this metric following Caicedo et al. (2019); it does not report PQ or other metrics, so the SOTA claim is metric-specific (Appendix A).
  • domain assumption The out-of-domain datasets are genuinely out-of-domain, i.e., not represented in the training set.
    The OOD evaluation supports the generalization claim; if any OOD dataset leaked into training, the claim would be weakened (Section 2.5).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Segment Anything for Histopathology." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PXRRT76B

@misc{pith2026250200408,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Segment Anything for Histopathology},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PXRRT76B}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.00408}
}
read the original abstract

Nucleus segmentation is an important analysis task in digital pathology. However, methods for automatic segmentation often struggle with new data from a different distribution, requiring users to manually annotate nuclei and retrain data-specific models. Vision foundation models (VFMs), such as the Segment Anything Model (SAM), offer a more robust alternative for automatic and interactive segmentation. Despite their success in natural images, a foundation model for nucleus segmentation in histopathology is still missing. Initial efforts to adapt SAM have shown some success, but did not yet introduce a comprehensive model for diverse segmentation tasks. To close this gap, we introduce PathoSAM, a VFM for nucleus segmentation, based on training SAM on a diverse dataset. Our extensive experiments show that it is the new state-of-the-art model for automatic and interactive nucleus instance segmentation in histopathology. We also demonstrate how it can be adapted for other segmentation tasks, including semantic nucleus segmentation. For this task, we show that it yields results better than popular methods, while not yet beating the state-of-the-art, CellViT. Our models are open-source and compatible with popular tools for data annotation. We also provide scripts for whole-slide image segmentation. Our code and models are publicly available at https://github.com/computational-cell-analytics/patho-sam.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.00408 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. a) Overview of the PathoSAM: we train generalist models for nucleus segmenta￾tion on a combination of 6 datasets. The models support interactive and auto￾matic instance segmentation, are integrated with user-friendly tools, and can be further finetuned for semantic segmentation. b) Automatic instance segmentation results of 12 datasets. PathoSAM (ViT-L) is the best model, despite evaluations favoring other models by… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. a) Automatic instance segmentation results for 8 datasets. Italic font indicates that the corresponding training split of the dataset was used for our generalist training, while bold font indicates that it was not. b) Interactive segmentation results for 8 datasets (same as in a)) for PathoSAM and other SAM variants. We report the interactive segmentation quality for initial point and box prompts as well as correcti… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Segmentation of lymphocytes a) and glands b) with different SAM variants. We report measures for automatic and interactive segmentation, the right hand side shows qualitative examples from the dataset with automatic segmentation results. In both cases, PathoSAM (specialist) is trained on a separate split, using default SAM for weight initialization. c) Semantic segmentation results on PanNuke, comparing PathoSAM wit… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (13 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Segmentation on WSI. The tile shape is 512 × 512, with an overlap of 64 pixels. a) shows an example for automatic instance segmentation on data from https: //openslide.cs.cmu.edu/download/openslide-testdata/ (32,914 × 46,000 pixels). b) gives resource demand and runtim…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: a) The architecture of our generalist model, which combines SAM with an ad￾ditional decoder for instance segmentation, following the design from µSAM. b) The architecture for semantic segmentation, which uses a ViT-B image encoder, initialized with the weights of the P…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Three example of CryoNuSeg images for with ground-truth nucleus annotations and automatic segmentation from PathoSAM. The white box highlight the fol￾lowing challenges in this dataset: a) PathoSAM scores bad where the annotations are inconsistent with the nucleus ROI, …
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Qualitative plots for automatic instance segmentation with PathoSAM and other methods. Names of datasets in italics are in-domain, and bold are out-of-domain. 21 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Quantitative results for automatic instance segmentation with PathoSAM and all other methods. Names of datasets in italics are in-domain, and bold are out-of￾domain. 22 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: F1 Score, Recall and Precision for IoU thresholds from 0.5 to 0.95, for all datasets, for automatic instance segmentation with PathoSAM model (Generalist - ViT-L). Names of datasets in italics are in-domain, and bold are out-of-domain. 23 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Grid search results over (the most important) parameters of the watershed used to obtain the instance segmentation in AIS. These parameters are the thresholds applied to center and boundary distances predicted by the segmentation decoder in order to find seeds. Please…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Qualitative and quantitative results of PathoSAM on neutrophil granulocytes, and a further specialist model trained on a few images for neutrophil granulocyte segmentation on (Schuiveling et al., 2025). Neutrophils have multi-lobed nuclei, which are more challenging t…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Quantitative results for semantic segmentation, for different versions of the benchmarked methods (a) and the per-class performance for the respective best method (b). c) shows qualitative examples. 26 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Qualitative plots for interactive segmentation with SAM, µSAM and PathoSAM ViT-B generalist model. 27 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Quantitative results for interactive segmentation for SAM, µSAM, PathoSAM (PanNuke) and all variants of PathoSAM (Generalist) models. 28 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: User study with µSAM in napari, with tiling-window based inference for this large image 30 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_15.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: User study with SAM-API in QuPath 31 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_16.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Towards Autonomous and Auditable Medical Imaging Model Development

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    AMID, a verification-guided multi-agent MLE system for medical imaging, outperforms general MLE agents on 20 ReX-MLE challenges and approaches human challenge solutions on several tasks.

  2. Evaluating Vision Foundation Models for Pixel and Object Classification in Microscopy

    cs.CV 2026-03 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Vision foundation model features improve pixel and object classification in microscopy over hand-crafted features, and object-guided attentive probing (ObAP) can match or beat supervised baselines with very few labels.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 14 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Nuclick: A deep learning framework for interactive segmentation of microscopic images

    Navid Alemi Koohbanani, Mostafa Jahanifar, Neda Zamani Tajadin, and Nasir Rajpoot. Nuclick: A deep learning framework for interactive segmentation of microscopic images. Medical Image Analysis, 65: 0 101771, October 2020. ISSN 1361-8415. doi:10.1016/j.media.2020.101771. URL http://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2020.101771

    arXiv 2020

  2. [2]

    Segment anything for microscopy

    Anwai Archit, Luca Freckmann, Sushmita Nair, Nabeel Khalid, Paul Hilt, Vikas Rajashekar, Marei Freitag, Carolin Teuber, Genevieve Buckley, Sebastian von Haaren, Sagnik Gupta, Andreas Dengel, Sheraz Ahmed, and Constantin Pape. Segment anything for microscopy. Nature Methods, 22 0 (3): 0 579–591, February 2025 a . ISSN 1548-7105. doi:10.1038/s41592-024-0258...

    doi:10.1038/s41592-024-02580-4 2025

  3. [3]

    Medicosam: Towards foundation models for medical image segmentation, 2025 b

    Anwai Archit, Luca Freckmann, and Constantin Pape. Medicosam: Towards foundation models for medical image segmentation, 2025 b . URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.11734

    arXiv 2025

  4. [4]

    Loughrey, José A

    Peter Bankhead, Maurice B. Loughrey, José A. Fernández, Yvonne Dombrowski, Darragh G. McArt, Philip D. Dunne, Stephen McQuaid, Ronan T. Gray, Liam J. Murray, Helen G. Coleman, Jacqueline A. James, Manuel Salto-Tellez, and Peter W. Hamilton. Qupath: Open source software for digital pathology image analysis. Scientific Reports, 7 0 (1), December 2017. ISSN ...

    doi:10.1038/s41598-017-17204-5 2017

  5. [5]

    Nagtegaal, Maria Rodriguez Martinez, and Inti Zlobec

    Elias Baumann, Bastian Dislich, Josef Lorenz Rumberger, Iris D. Nagtegaal, Maria Rodriguez Martinez, and Inti Zlobec. Hover-next: A fast nuclei segmentation and classification pipeline for next generation histopathology. In Medical Imaging with Deep Learning, 2024. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=3vmB43oqIO

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    Caicedo, Allen Goodman, Kyle W

    Juan C. Caicedo, Allen Goodman, Kyle W. Karhohs, Beth A. Cimini, Jeanelle Ackerman, Marzieh Haghighi, CherKeng Heng, Tim Becker, Minh Doan, Claire McQuin, Mohammad Rohban, Shantanu Singh, and Anne E. Carpenter. Nucleus segmentation across imaging experiments: the 2018 data science bowl. Nature Methods, 16 0 (12): 0 1247–1253, October 2019. ISSN 1548-7105....

    doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0612-7 2018

  7. [7]

    Sam-med2d, 2023

    Junlong Cheng, Jin Ye, Zhongying Deng, Jianpin Chen, Tianbin Li, Haoyu Wang, Yanzhou Su, Ziyan Huang, Jilong Chen, Lei Jiang, Hui Sun, Junjun He, Shaoting Zhang, Min Zhu, and Yu Qiao. Sam-med2d, 2023. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.16184

    arXiv 2023

  8. [8]

    Landman, Yucheng Tang, Lee E

    Ruining Deng, Can Cui, Quan Liu, Tianyuan Yao, Lucas Walker Remedios, Shunxing Bao, Bennett A. Landman, Yucheng Tang, Lee E. Wheless, Lori A. Coburn, Keith T. Wilson, Yaohong Wang, Agnes B. Fogo, Haichun Yang, and Yuankai Huo. Segment anything model ( SAM ) for digital pathology: Assess zero-shot segmentation on whole slide imaging. In Medical Imaging wit...

    work page 2023

Show all 40 references
  1. [9]

    An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale

    Alexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn, Xiaohua Zhai, Thomas Unterthiner, Mostafa Dehghani, Matthias Minderer, Georg Heigold, Sylvain Gelly, Jakob Uszkoreit, and Neil Houlsby. An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at...

    2021

  2. [10]

    Pannuke: an open pan-cancer histology dataset for nuclei instance segmentation and classification

    Jevgenij Gamper, Navid Alemi Koohbanani, Ksenija Benes, Ali Khuram, and Nasir Rajpoot. Pannuke: an open pan-cancer histology dataset for nuclei instance segmentation and classification. In European Congress on Digital Pathology, pages 11--19. Springer, 2019. URL https://doi.or...

    2019 doi

  3. [11]

    Instanseg: an embedding-based instance segmentation algorithm optimized for accurate, efficient and portable cell segmentation, 2024

    Thibaut Goldsborough, Ben Philps, Alan O'Callaghan, Fiona Inglis, Leo Leplat, Andrew Filby, Hakan Bilen, and Peter Bankhead. Instanseg: an embedding-based instance segmentation algorithm optimized for accurate, efficient and portable cell segmentation, 2024. URL https://arxiv....

    2024 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Hover-net: Simultaneous segmentation and classification of nuclei in multi-tissue histology images

    Simon Graham, Quoc Dang Vu, Shan E Ahmed Raza, Ayesha Azam, Yee Wah Tsang, Jin Tae Kwak, and Nasir Rajpoot. Hover-net: Simultaneous segmentation and classification of nuclei in multi-tissue histology images. Medical Image Analysis, 58: 0 101563, December 2019. ISSN 1361-8415. ...

    2019

  5. [13]

    Ahmed Raza, Hesham El Daly, Kishore Gopalakrishnan, David Snead, and Nasir M

    Simon Graham, Mostafa Jahanifar, Ayesha Azam, Mohammed Nimir, Yee-Wah Tsang, Katherine Dodd, Emily Hero, Harvir Sahota, Atisha Tank, Ksenija Benes, Noorul Wahab, Fayyaz Minhas, Shan E. Ahmed Raza, Hesham El Daly, Kishore Gopalakrishnan, David Snead, and Nasir M. Rajpoot. Lizar...

    2021

  6. [14]

    Roth, and Daguang Xu

    Ali Hatamizadeh, Yucheng Tang, Vishwesh Nath, Dong Yang, Andriy Myronenko, Bennett Landman, Holger R. Roth, and Daguang Xu. Unetr: Transformers for 3d medical image segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), pages ...

    2022

  7. [15]

    o rst, Moritz Rempe, Lukas Heine, Constantin Seibold, Julius Keyl, Giulia Baldini, Selma Ugurel, Jens Siveke, Barbara Gr\

    Fabian H\" o rst, Moritz Rempe, Lukas Heine, Constantin Seibold, Julius Keyl, Giulia Baldini, Selma Ugurel, Jens Siveke, Barbara Gr\" u nwald, Jan Egger, and Jens Kleesiek. Cellvit: Vision transformers for precise cell segmentation and classification. Medical Image Analysis, 9...

    2024

  8. [16]

    Deep learning for digital pathology image analysis: A comprehensive tutorial with selected use cases

    Andrew Janowczyk and Anant Madabhushi. Deep learning for digital pathology image analysis: A comprehensive tutorial with selected use cases. Journal of Pathology Informatics, 7 0 (1): 0 29, January 2016. ISSN 2153-3539. doi:10.4103/2153-3539.186902. URL http://doi.org/10.4103/...

    2016

  9. [17]

    Berg, Wan-Yen Lo, Piotr Dollar, and Ross Girshick

    Alexander Kirillov, Eric Mintun, Nikhila Ravi, Hanzi Mao, Chloe Rolland, Laura Gustafson, Tete Xiao, Spencer Whitehead, Alexander C. Berg, Wan-Yen Lo, Piotr Dollar, and Ross Girshick. Segment anything. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision ...

    2023

  10. [18]

    A dataset and a technique for generalized nuclear segmentation for computational pathology

    Neeraj Kumar, Ruchika Verma, Sanuj Sharma, Surabhi Bhargava, Abhishek Vahadane, and Amit Sethi. A dataset and a technique for generalized nuclear segmentation for computational pathology. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 36 0 (7): 0 1550–1560, July 2017. ISSN 1558-254X. d...

    2017

  11. [19]

    Cryonuseg: A dataset for nuclei instance segmentation of cryosectioned h&e-stained histological images

    Amirreza Mahbod, Gerald Schaefer, Benjamin Bancher, Christine L\" o w, Georg Dorffner, Rupert Ecker, and Isabella Ellinger. Cryonuseg: A dataset for nuclei instance segmentation of cryosectioned h&e-stained histological images. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 132: 0 104349,...

    2021

  12. [20]

    Nuinsseg: A fully annotated dataset for nuclei instance segmentation in h&e-stained histological images

    Amirreza Mahbod, Christine Polak, Katharina Feldmann, Rumsha Khan, Katharina Gelles, Georg Dorffner, Ramona Woitek, Sepideh Hatamikia, and Isabella Ellinger. Nuinsseg: A fully annotated dataset for nuclei instance segmentation in h&e-stained histological images. Scientific Dat...

    2024 doi

  13. [21]

    Holy-net: Segmentation of histological images of diffuse large b-cell lymphoma

    Hussein Naji, Lucas Sancere, Adrian Simon, Reinhard B\" u ttner, Marie-Lisa Eich, Philipp Lohneis, and Katarzyna Bożek. Holy-net: Segmentation of histological images of diffuse large b-cell lymphoma. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 170: 0 107978, March 2024. ISSN 0010-4825....

    2024

  14. [22]

    Segmentation of nuclei in histopathology images by deep regression of the distance map

    Peter Naylor, Marick Laé, Fabien Reyal, and Thomas Walter. Segmentation of nuclei in histopathology images by deep regression of the distance map. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 38 0 (2): 0 448–459, February 2019. ISSN 1558-254X. doi:10.1109/tmi.2018.2865709. URL http:/...

    2019

  15. [23]

    SAM 2: Segment anything in images and videos

    Nikhila Ravi, Valentin Gabeur, Yuan-Ting Hu, Ronghang Hu, Chaitanya Ryali, Tengyu Ma, Haitham Khedr, Roman R \"a dle, Chloe Rolland, Laura Gustafson, Eric Mintun, Junting Pan, Kalyan Vasudev Alwala, Nicolas Carion, Chao-Yuan Wu, Ross Girshick, Piotr Dollar, and Christoph Feich...

    2025

  16. [24]

    U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation, page 234–241

    Olaf Ronneberger, Philipp Fischer, and Thomas Brox. U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation, page 234–241. Springer International Publishing, 2015. ISBN 9783319245744. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28. URL http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28

    2015 doi

  17. [25]

    A novel dataset for nuclei and tissue segmentation in melanoma with baseline nuclei segmentation and tissue segmentation benchmarks

    Mark Schuiveling, Hong Liu, Daniel Eek, Gerben E Breimer, Karijn P M Suijkerbuijk, Willeke A M Blokx, and Mitko Veta. A novel dataset for nuclei and tissue segmentation in melanoma with baseline nuclei segmentation and tissue segmentation benchmarks. GigaScience, 14, 2025. ISS...

    2025 doi

  18. [26]

    Pluim, Hao Chen, Xiaojuan Qi, Pheng-Ann Heng, Yun Bo Guo, Li Yang Wang, Bogdan J

    Korsuk Sirinukunwattana, Josien P.W. Pluim, Hao Chen, Xiaojuan Qi, Pheng-Ann Heng, Yun Bo Guo, Li Yang Wang, Bogdan J. Matuszewski, Elia Bruni, Urko Sanchez, Anton B\" o hm, Olaf Ronneberger, Bassem Ben Cheikh, Daniel Racoceanu, Philipp Kainz, Michael Pfeiffer, Martin Urschler...

    2017 doi

  19. [27]

    Nicholas Sofroniew, Talley Lambert, Grzegorz Bokota, Juan Nunez-Iglesias, Peter Sobolewski, Andrew Sweet, Lorenzo Gaifas, Kira Evans, Alister Burt, Draga Doncila Pop, Kevin Yamauchi, Melissa Weber Mendon c a, Genevieve Buckley, Wouter-Michiel Vierdag, Loic Royer, Ahmet Can Sol...

    2024

  20. [28]

    Training deep learning models for cell image segmentation with sparse annotations

    Ko Sugawara. Training deep learning models for cell image segmentation with sparse annotations. BioRxiv, pages 2023--06, 2023. URL https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.06.13.544786

    2023 doi

  21. [29]

    hover-unet

    Cristian Tommasino, Cristiano Russo, Antonio Maria Rinaldi, and Francesco Ciompi. “hover-unet”: Accelerating hovernet with unet-based multi-class nuclei segmentation via knowledge distillation. In 2024 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), page 1–4. IEEE, ...

    2024

  22. [30]

    Deep learning in histopathology: the path to the clinic

    Jeroen van der Laak, Geert Litjens, and Francesco Ciompi. Deep learning in histopathology: the path to the clinic. Nature Medicine, 27 0 (5): 0 775–784, May 2021. ISSN 1546-170X. doi:10.1038/s41591-021-01343-4. URL http://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-021-01343-4

    2021 doi

  23. [31]

    Ahmed Raza, Nasir Rajpoot, Xiyi Wu, Huai Chen, Yijie Huang, Lisheng Wang, Hyun Jung, G

    Ruchika Verma, Neeraj Kumar, Abhijeet Patil, Nikhil Cherian Kurian, Swapnil Rane, Simon Graham, Quoc Dang Vu, Mieke Zwager, Shan E. Ahmed Raza, Nasir Rajpoot, Xiyi Wu, Huai Chen, Yijie Huang, Lisheng Wang, Hyun Jung, G. Thomas Brown, Yanling Liu, Shuolin Liu, Seyed Alireza Fat...

    2021

  24. [32]

    Methods for segmentation and classification of digital microscopy tissue images

    Quoc Dang Vu, Simon Graham, Tahsin Kurc, Minh Nguyen Nhat To, Muhammad Shaban, Talha Qaiser, Navid Alemi Koohbanani, Syed Ali Khurram, Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer, Tianhao Zhao, Rajarsi Gupta, Jin Tae Kwak, Nasir Rajpoot, Joel Saltz, and Keyvan Farahani. Methods for segmentation...

    2019

  25. [33]

    Simultaneously segmenting and classifying cell nuclei by using multi-task learning in multiplex immunohistochemical tissue microarray sections

    Ranran Wang, Yusong Qiu, Xinyu Hao, Shan Jin, Junxiu Gao, Heng Qi, Qi Xu, Yong Zhang, and Hongming Xu. Simultaneously segmenting and classifying cell nuclei by using multi-task learning in multiplex immunohistochemical tissue microarray sections. Biomedical Signal Processing a...

    2024

  26. [34]

    Nuclei instance segmentation and classification in histopathology images with stardist

    Martin Weigert and Uwe Schmidt. Nuclei instance segmentation and classification in histopathology images with stardist. In 2022 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging Challenges (ISBIC), page 1–4. IEEE, March 2022. doi:10.1109/isbic56247.2022.9854534. URL http://do...

    2022

  27. [35]

    On generalisability of segment anything model for nuclear instance segmentation in histology images, 2024

    Kesi Xu, Lea Goetz, and Nasir Rajpoot. On generalisability of segment anything model for nuclear instance segmentation in histology images, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.14248

    2024 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Surgicalsam: Efficient class promptable surgical instrument segmentation

    Wenxi Yue, Jing Zhang, Kun Hu, Yong Xia, Jiebo Luo, and Zhiyong Wang. Surgicalsam: Efficient class promptable surgical instrument segmentation. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 38 0 (7): 0 6890–6898, March 2024. ISSN 2159-5399. doi:10.1609/aaai.v3...

    2024 doi

  29. [37]

    SAM-Path: A Segment Anything Model for Semantic Segmentation in Digital Pathology, page 161–170

    Jingwei Zhang, Ke Ma, Saarthak Kapse, Joel Saltz, Maria Vakalopoulou, Prateek Prasanna, and Dimitris Samaras. SAM-Path: A Segment Anything Model for Semantic Segmentation in Digital Pathology, page 161–170. Springer Nature Switzerland, 2023. ISBN 9783031474019. doi:10.1007/978...

    2023 doi

  30. [38]

    Glandsam: Injecting morphology knowledge into segment anything model for label-free gland segmentation

    Qixiang Zhang, Yi Li, Cheng Xue, Haonan Wang, and Xiaomeng Li. Glandsam: Injecting morphology knowledge into segment anything model for label-free gland segmentation. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 2024. URL https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2024.3476176

    2024

  31. [39]

    A foundation model for joint segmentation, detection and recognition of biomedical objects across nine modalities

    Theodore Zhao, Yu Gu, Jianwei Yang, Naoto Usuyama, Ho Hin Lee, Sid Kiblawi, Tristan Naumann, Jianfeng Gao, Angela Crabtree, Jacob Abel, Christine Moung-Wen, Brian Piening, Carlo Bifulco, Mu Wei, Hoifung Poon, and Sheng Wang. A foundation model for joint segmentation, detection...

    2024 doi

  32. [40]

    Segment everything everywhere all at once

    Xueyan Zou, Jianwei Yang, Hao Zhang, Feng Li, Linjie Li, Jianfeng Wang, Lijuan Wang, Jianfeng Gao, and Yong Jae Lee. Segment everything everywhere all at once. In Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, NIPS '23, Red Hook, NY,...

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.