Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 9 minor 1 cited by

Fabrication of Fibers with Complex Features Using Thermal Drawing of 3D-Printed Preforms

T0 review · 3 major / 9 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that ordinary 3D-printed polymer preforms can be thermally drawn into continuous, shape-preserving fibers as thin as 200 µm, enabling rapid prototyping of medical and robotic fibers.

desk verdict Useful proof-of-concept with one load-bearing contradiction in the star example; worth refereeing after fixes. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.00741 v1 pith:ETS2FE6Q submitted 2025-02-02 physics.med-ph

Ali Anil Demircali , Jinshi Zhao , Ayhan Aktas , Mohamed EMK Abdelaziz , Burak Temelkuran This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.med-ph
keywords 3Dprintingthermaldrawingfiberpreformsfuseddepositionmodelingmedicalcathetersmultimaterialfiberspolypropylenemagneticactuation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that fused-deposition-modeled polymer preforms, printed with ordinary commercial printers, can be thermally drawn into continuous fibers whose cross-sectional geometry survives at diameters as small as 200 micrometers and feature sizes of a few microns. The importance is that preform fabrication, normally the slow, costly bottleneck of fiber drawing, becomes a rapid, low-cost prototyping step with no custom dies or molds. The authors show the approach generalizes: polycarbonate fibers with rabbit, butterfly, and star cross-sections; the first thermally drawn polypropylene fibers; fibers with longitudinally tapered diameters; interlocking multi-segment catheter designs; and magnetic iron-filled PLA segments inside a PC fiber. If correct, this turns a specialized fabrication pipeline into an accessible platform for medical catheters, robotic actuators, and functional fibers.

What carries the argument

The carrying mechanism is the preform-to-fiber draw: a macroscopic 3D-printed preform, heated in a three-zone furnace to its viscoelastic state, is fed at speed $v_d$ and wound at speed $v_w$, so the fiber diameter follows $d_f = d_p \sqrt{v_d/v_w}$, shrinking the preform's cross-section uniformly while preserving its topology. Printing parameters are the enabling lever: 100% infill with 80 µm layers, chosen as a compromise between the ±19 µm fluctuation of 50 µm layers and the exponential growth to ±400 µm at 250 µm, produces dense preforms whose internal interfaces do not disrupt the draw. Functional complexity is added before the draw, in CAD, rather than by post-processing: lumen positions, stiffness transitions, magnetic segments, and interlocking profiles are all printed into the preform and simply scaled down.

What would settle it

Examine a cross-section of a roughly 200 µm fiber drawn from an 80 µm-layer FDM polycarbonate preform under micro-CT or electron microscopy: if the fiber shows internal voids, layer-line delamination, or bubble defects, then the assumption of a void-free, homogeneous drawable preform is false. A second check: measure diameter fluctuation along a fiber drawn from a 50 µm-layer preform; if it does not fall near the reported ±19 µm or does not follow the reported exponential trend with layer thickness, the parameter optimization claim would not be reproducible.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that thermal drawing of 3D-printed polymer preforms preserves complex cross-sectional detail down to fiber diameters of roughly 200 µm, with measured deviations from the designed shape of 10–25 µm in the most detailed features. The paper documents this with rabbit-, butterfly-, and star-shaped polycarbonate fibers, showing that stress concentrates at thin protrusions such as ears, antennae, and wing tips and causes the largest distortion there. It extends the same route to semi-crystalline polypropylene, which is reported here as the first thermal drawing of this material, and which bends about 5.1 times more than polycarbonate for the same tendon force, and to iron-filled PLA composites that deflect in a magnetic field. It also uses preforms with periodic diameter reductions to produce tapered fibers with a 2.2 mm shaft and a 1 mm flexible tip in a single draw, and four interlocked sliding segments for programmable bevel-tip needles. The intended outcome is a rapid-iteration platform: design in CAD, print a 25 mm × 150 mm preform in a few hours, and draw it into meters of fiber with bespoke cross-sections and material function.

Load-bearing premise

Fused-deposition-modeled preforms printed at 100% infill are homogeneous, void-free, and thermally stable enough to be drawn into fibers without internal delamination, bubble growth, or material degradation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Fiber prototypes that once required custom dies, molds, or machining can be made in one draw from a printed preform, cutting development time for steerable catheters and robotic fibers.
  • Thermally drawn polypropylene fibers should allow steerable instruments with tighter bending radii, since the measured bending angle was 5.1 times larger than polycarbonate under the same tendon force.
  • Tapered fibers with a stiff shaft and a flexible tip can be produced monolithically from a single preform with periodic diameter changes, eliminating post-machining assembly steps.
  • Magnetic segments survive the draw, so magnetically actuated fiber tips can be designed by printing and drawing rather than by assembling discrete magnets.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If dense FDM preforms draw cleanly, the same route should extend to other printable polymers and composites, such as TPU or carbon-filled filaments, provided their viscosity and degradation temperature fit the draw tower, making the material palette a print-settings question rather than a tooling question.
  • The exponential growth of diameter fluctuation with layer thickness suggests that even finer layers, or annealing or consolidation of the preform before drawing, could push shape preservation below 200 µm and reduce feature distortion, though at the cost of print time.
  • The interlocking segment design implies that other mechanically coupled, movable structures, not just bevel-tip needles, could be scaled down as long as the gaps between segments are wide enough to avoid fusion during the draw.
  • Since hybrid preforms with a printed shell around a bulk tube co-drew with no interfacial gaps, a testable extension is to print functional channels or electrodes around conventional extruded cores, combining the advantages of both fabrication routes.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 9 minor

Summary. This manuscript reports a hybrid fabrication route in which polymer fiber preforms are produced by fused deposition modeling (FDM) 3D printing and then drawn into fibers on a custom thermal draw tower. The authors demonstrate that cross-sectional geometries (rabbit, butterfly, star) survive scaling to fiber diameters approaching 200 µm, and they extend the approach to functional fibers: polypropylene fibers with low bending stiffness, iron-filled PLA fibers with magnetic actuation, tapered catheter-like fibers, four-segment interlocking bevel-tip needle fibers, and hybrid preforms combining 3D-printed shells with bulk COP/COC cores. The central claim is that this combination enables rapid, low-cost fabrication of high-aspect-ratio polymer structures with complex shapes, with features retained at small scales.

Significance. The central feasibility claim—that complex 3D-printed polymer cross-sections can be thermally drawn to hundreds-of-micrometers scale while retaining their shapes and functions—is plausible and is supported by direct microscope images with stated draw ratios and by independent measurements of bending angle and magnetic deflection. The use of a standard mass-conservation relation (Eq. 1) for draw-down and quantitative comparisons between preform and fiber cross-sections are strengths. If the internal contradiction regarding the star-shaped fiber and the unsupported 'few microns' claim are resolved, this would be a useful contribution to fiber preform manufacturing, with clear applications in medical catheters and soft robotics. The paper is less strong in quantifying feature fidelity at the extreme scale-down ratios and in correctly labeling material property data.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3.1.3 and Fig. 3e] The text in Section 3.1.3 states that 'star-shaped fibers retained five equidistant holes (50 µm each) surrounding a central hollow star at draw ratios up to 1:120 and diameters of 0.30 mm,' while the caption of Fig. 3e states 'with the star shape showing channel collapse.' These two statements describe mutually exclusive outcomes. Because the star geometry is the example that approaches the abstract's 'features down to a few microns' claim, this contradiction directly affects the central shape-preservation result. The authors must either present quantitative evidence (e.g., hole area or roundness as a function of draw ratio) that the star channels are indeed retained, or revise the claim to acknowledge channel collapse and define 'collapse' operationally.
  2. [Abstract and Section 3.1.3] The abstract claims fibers with 'features down to a few microns,' but no feature dimension below 50 µm is reported anywhere in the manuscript; the largest measured deviations are 25 µm (rabbit) and 10 µm (butterfly), which are not feature sizes. The manuscript never reports the smallest reproducible feature dimension in a drawn fiber, nor does it describe the measurement methodology for the reported deviations. Please either add measurements of the smallest surviving features (with error bars and number of samples) or temper the abstract to reflect the actual demonstrated scale (e.g., features of order 50 µm in fibers of order 0.3 mm diameter).
  3. [Section 3.2.3] The material property values cited as 'tensile stress' (2.134 GPa for PC and 12 MPa for PP) are, by their magnitude, Young's moduli, not tensile stresses. This mislabeling matters because the subsequent statement that PP fibers exhibit 5.1 times greater bending angles 'due to their lower tensile stress' uses the wrong physical quantity to explain the mechanical comparison. Replace 'tensile stress' with 'tensile modulus' (or 'tensile strength' if that is intended, but then the values and the bending mechanics discussion need to be reworked).
minor comments (9)
  1. [Section 2.2, Eq. (1)] The equation uses r_d and r_p while the text defines d_f and d_p; use consistent notation.
  2. [Section 3.1.3] The section numbering jumps from 3.1.1 to 3.1.3 with no 3.1.2; renumber the sections.
  3. [Fig. 3d caption] The phrase 'illustrating the preservation of cross-sectional detail at a scale of 50 µm' is ambiguous; specify whether this is a scale bar and its value.
  4. [Table 2] The column symbols T_t, T_m, T_b, and m_h are not defined in the caption; define them (top/middle/bottom zone temperatures, hanging mass).
  5. [Fig. 2a–c] The manuscript reports an 'exponential' trend for diameter fluctuation with layer thickness but provides no statistical details (number of fibers sampled, standard error, or fit parameters); add this information.
  6. [Section 3.2.3] The '5.1 times greater bending angles' comparison should state the force level at which it is evaluated and whether the fibers have identical outer dimensions.
  7. [Section 3.2.4] Fig. 7e shows 'shrinkage near the mPLA areas,' but the text does not discuss how this shrinkage affects the magnetic actuation performance or the structural integrity of the fiber.
  8. [Section 3.2.5] The statement that micro-CT imaging showed 'no gaps between the materials' should report the voxel size of the micro-CT scan so the reader can gauge the resolution.
  9. [References [15] and [58]] References [15] and [58] are incomplete (missing authors, journal, volume, and year); complete them.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: this is an experimental process demonstration whose central claims rest on direct measurements, not on fitted parameters, definitions, or a load-bearing self-citation chain.

full rationale

The paper's central claim, that FDM-printed preforms can be thermally drawn into fibers of about 200 micrometers while preserving complex cross-sections, is an experimental result supported by microscope images and direct measurements, not by a predictive derivation that reduces to its inputs. Equation (1) is the standard mass-conservation draw-down relation df = dp * sqrt(vd/vw); it is used to set or interpret winding speed during the draw and is not fitted from the fiber diameters it is later said to explain. Shape-fidelity claims are evaluated by overlaying drawn-fiber images with the CAD designs and reporting maximum deviations, 25 micrometers for the rabbit and 10 micrometers for the butterfly; these are direct measurements, not outputs forced by construction. The tapered-fiber, stiffness-comparison, and magnetic-actuation claims are likewise direct demonstrations. Self-citations, such as the Programmable Bevel-Tip Needle prior work [46], Fiberbots [38], and photonic-bandgap fiber work [27], provide context or previously demonstrated components, but the present paper's load-bearing evidence is its own fabrication and characterization data; no alternative is excluded by an imported uniqueness theorem, and no ansatz is smuggled in through a citation. The contradiction between the Figure 3e caption, which says 'the star shape showing channel collapse,' and the text, which says the star-shaped fibers retained five equidistant holes, is a concern about internal consistency and evidence quality, not circularity, because neither statement is an equation or a fitted quantity that re-enters the argument. The unquantified 'features down to a few microns' claim is likewise an evidence-support issue rather than a circular reasoning step. No self-definitional reduction, fitted-input prediction, or load-bearing self-citation chain is present, so the appropriate finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted to data, and no new physical entities are introduced. The central claim is an experimental process demonstration, so the ledger contains only the domain assumptions that any thermal-drawing fabrication relies on.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Thermal drawing preserves cross-sectional geometry under affine scaling, governed by mass conservation (Eq. 1).
    This is the basis for translating preform shapes into fiber shapes; invoked in Section 2.2 and Section 3.1.3.
  • domain assumption FDM-printed preforms at 100% infill are sufficiently void-free and homogeneous to draw without internal delamination or uncontrolled bubble growth.
    This underpins the whole method; Section 3.1.1 attributes diameter fluctuation to layer thickness but does not directly measure void content or layer adhesion.
  • domain assumption PC, PP, and mPLA have compatible thermomechanical properties for co-drawing.
    Needed for multi-material fibers; Section 3.2.4 shows shrinkage near mPLA regions, indicating incomplete compatibility that is acknowledged but not resolved.
  • domain assumption Fiber diameter is fully controlled by feed/winding speeds and tension, ignoring neck-down dynamics and draw-induced stress variations.
    Used to set target diameters in Section 2.2; the authors note localized stress variations in tapered preforms that complicate this simple relation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Fabrication of Fibers with Complex Features Using Thermal Drawing of 3D-Printed Preforms." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ETS2FE6Q

@misc{pith2026250200741,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Fabrication of Fibers with Complex Features Using Thermal Drawing of 3D-Printed Preforms},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ETS2FE6Q}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.00741}
}
read the original abstract

High-aspect-ratio polymer materials are widely utilized in applications ranging from everyday materials such as clothing to specialized equipment in industrial and medical fields. Traditional fabrication methods, such as extrusion and molding, face challenges in integrating diverse materials and achieving complex geometries. Additionally, these methods are limited in their ability to provide low-cost and rapid prototyping, which are critical for research and development processes. In this work, we investigated the use of commercially available 3D printers to fabricate fiber preforms, which were subsequently thermally drawn into fibers. By optimizing 3D printing parameters, we achieved the fabrication of fibers with diameters as small as 200 um having complex shapes, with features down to a few microns. We demonstrated the versatility of this method by fabricating fibers from diverse set of materials, such as fibers with different stiffnesses and fibers with magnetic characteristics, which are beneficial for developing tendon-driven and magnetically actuated robotic fibers. In addition, by designing novel preform geometries, we produced tapered fibers and fibers with interlocking mechanisms, also tailored for use in medical steerable catheter applications. These advancements highlight the scalability and versatility of this approach, offering a robust platform for producing high-precision polymer fibers for diverse applications.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Modular Robotic Catheters for Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

    cs.RO 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A thermally drawn 2-segment tendon-driven catheter with a modular actuation handle achieves 72° bending and cannulates renal and mesenteric arteries in an in-vitro aorta phantom.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 65 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    They are used in applications ranging from everyday textiles to cutting -edge fields such as optical transmission [1,2], and medical instruments such as catheters [3,4]

    Introduction High-aspect-ratio polymer materials are integral to modern technologies due to their versatility, enabling flexibility with intricate geometries. They are used in applications ranging from everyday textiles to cutting -edge fields such as optical transmission [1,2], and medical instruments such as catheters [3,4]. Realizing these advanced app...

    work page

  2. [2]

    The printer employed a 0.4AA print core for non -abrasive plastics

    Materials and Methods 2.1 Preform Fabrication and 3D Printing Parameters Preform designs were created using SolidWorks (Dassault Systems, France) CAD software and fabricated with a Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) printer (Ultimaker 3+ Extended, Ultimaker BV, Netherlands). The printer employed a 0.4AA print core for non -abrasive plastics. Fabrication para...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Hollow -core PC preforms with an outer diameter (OD) of 20 mm, an inner diameter (ID) of 6 mm, and a length of 100 mm were used in the experiments

    Results and Discussion 3.1 Fiber Characterization 3.1.1 Effect of Printing Layer Thickness To investigate the effect of printing layer thickness on fiber diameter consistency, we explored a range of layer thicknesses from 50 µm to 250 µm, in 50 µm increments. Hollow -core PC preforms with an outer diameter (OD) of 20 mm, an inner diameter (ID) of 6 mm, an...

    work page

  4. [4]

    By utilizing 3D printing for preform fabrication, we were able to rapidly design and produce low-cost preforms with complex cross -sections and various materials

    Conclusions This study explored the fabrication of advanced fibers with complex geometries, material compositions, and tailored functionalities by the introduction of additive manufacturing into the thermal drawing process. By utilizing 3D printing for preform fabrication, we were able to rapidly design and produce low-cost preforms with complex cross -se...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Rein, V.D

    M. Rein, V.D. Favrod, C. Hou, T. Khudiyev, A. Stolyarov, J. Cox, C.-C. Chung, C. Chhav, M. Ellis, J. Joannopoulos, Y. Fink, Diode fibres for fabric-based optical communications, Nature 560 (2018) 214–

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    S. Cho, E. Lee, S. Jo, G.M. Kim, W. Kim, Extrusion Characteristics of Thin Walled Tubes for Catheters Using Thermoplastic Elastomer, Polymers 12 (2020) 1628. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12081628

    work page doi:10.3390/polym12081628 2020

  7. [7]

    Zubia, J

    J. Zubia, J. Arrue, Plastic Optical Fibers: An Introduction to Their Technological Processes and Applications, Optical Fiber Technology 7 (2001) 101–140. https://doi.org/10.1006/ofte.2000.0355

    work page arXiv 2001

  8. [8]

    Maitz, Applications of synthetic polymers in clinical medicine, Biosurface and Biotribology 1 (2015) 161–176

    M.F. Maitz, Applications of synthetic polymers in clinical medicine, Biosurface and Biotribology 1 (2015) 161–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bsbt.2015.08.002

    work page doi:10.1016/j.bsbt.2015.08.002 2015

Show all 68 references
  1. [9]

    Abdelaziz, L

    M.E.M.K. Abdelaziz, L. Tian, M. Hamady, G.-Z. Yang, B. Temelkuran, X-ray to MR: the progress of flexible instruments for endovascular navigation, Prog. Biomed. Eng. 3 (2021) 032004. https://doi.org/10.1088/2516-1091/ac12d6

    2021 doi

  2. [10]

    Beckers, T

    M. Beckers, T. Schlüter, T. Vad, T. Gries, C.-A. Bunge, An overview on fabrication methods for polymer optical fibers, Polymer International 64 (2015) 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1002/pi.4805

    2015 doi

  3. [11]

    Tang, F.H

    D. Tang, F.H. Marchesini, L. Cardon, D.R. D’hooge, State of the -Art for Extrudate Swell of Molten Polymers: From Fundamental Understanding at Molecular Scale toward Optimal Die Design at Final Product Scale, Macromolecular Materials and Engineering 30 5 (2020) 2000340. https:...

    2020 doi

  4. [12]

    M. Liao, C. Wang, Y. Hong, Y. Zhang, X. Cheng, H. Sun, X. Huang, L. Ye, J. Wu, X. Shi, X. Kang, X. Zhou, J. Wang, P. Li, X. Sun, P. Chen, B. Wang, Y. Wang, Y. Xia, Y. Cheng, H. Peng, Industrial scale production of fibre batteries by a solution -extrusion method, Nat. Nanotechn...

    2022 doi

  5. [13]

    Cordeiro, A.K.L

    C.M.B. Cordeiro, A.K.L. Ng, H. Ebendorff -Heidepriem, Ultra-simplified Single-Step Fabrication of Microstructured Optical Fiber, Sci Rep 10 (2020) 9678. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-66632-3

    2020 doi

  6. [14]

    Jin, M.-J

    G.-B. Jin, M.-J. Wang, D.-Y. Zhao, H.-Q. Tian, Y.-F. Jin, Design and experiments of extrusion die for polypropylene five-lumen micro tube, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 214 (2014) 50 –59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2013.07.016

    2014 doi

  7. [15]

    H. Tian, D. Zhao, M. Wang, G. Jin, Y. Jin, Study on extrudate swell of polypropylene in double-lumen micro profile extrusion, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 225 (2015) 357 –368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2015.06.015

    2015 doi

  8. [16]

    Rabbi, T

    M.S. Rabbi, T. Islam, G.M.S. Islam, Injection -molded natural fiber-reinforced polymer composites–a review, Int J Mech Mater Eng 16 (2021) 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40712-021-00139-1

    2021 doi

  9. [17]

    G. Jin, Y. Jin, D. Zhao, G. Dai, Q. Zhang, Cross-section design of multi-lumen extrusion dies: study on the effects of die swell and gas flow rate of the lumen, Microsyst Technol 23 (2017) 5093 –5104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00542-017-3489-3

    2017 doi

  10. [18]

    Agassant, Y

    J.-F. Agassant, Y. Demay, Investigation of the Polymer Coextrusion Process: A Review, Polymers 14 (2022) 1309. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14071309

    2022 doi

  11. [19]

    E. Ayad, A. Cayla, F. Rault, A. Gonthier, C. Campagne, E. Devaux, Effect of Viscosity Ratio of Two Immiscible Polymers on Morphology in Bicomponent Melt Spinning Fibers, Advances in Polymer Technology 37 (2018) 1134–1141. https://doi.org/10.1002/adv.21772

    2018 doi

  12. [20]

    https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.abf0601

    Soft robotic steerable microcatheter for the endovascular treatment of cerebral disorders, (n.d.). https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.abf0601

    doi

  13. [21]

    Stolyarov, L

    A.M. Stolyarov, L. Wei, F. Sorin, G. Lestoquoy, J.D. Joannopoulos, Y. Fink, Fabrication and characterization of fibers with built-in liquid crystal channels and electrodes for transverse incident-light modulation, Applied Physics Letters 101 (2012) 011108. https://doi.org/10.1...

    2012 doi

  14. [22]

    Fernandes, A.J

    C. Fernandes, A.J. Pontes, J.C. Viana, A. Gaspar -Cunha, Modeling and Optimization of the Injection - Molding Process: A Review, Advances in Polymer Technology 37 (2018) 429 –449. https://doi.org/10.1002/adv.21683

    2018 doi

  15. [23]

    G. Loke, W. Yan, T. Khudiyev, G. Noel, Y. Fink, Recent Progress and Perspectives of Thermally Drawn Multimaterial Fiber Electronics, Advanced Materials 32 (2020) 1904911. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201904911

    2020 doi

  16. [24]

    Z. Wang, M. Chen, Y. Zheng, J. Zhang, Z. Wang, J. Yang, Q. Zhang, B. He, M. Qi, H. Zhang, K. Li, L. Wei, Advanced Thermally Drawn Multimaterial Fibers: Structure -Enabled Functionalities, Advanced Devices & Instrumentation 2021 (2021). https://doi.org/10.34133/2021/9676470

    2021 doi

  17. [25]

    Nguyen-Dang, A.C

    T. Nguyen-Dang, A.C. de Luca, W. Yan, Y. Qu, A.G. Page, M. Volpi, T. Das Gupta, S.P. Lacour, F. Sorin, Controlled Sub -Micrometer Hierarchical Textures Engineered in Polymeric Fibers and Microchannels via Thermal Drawing, Advanced Functional Materials 27 (2017) 1605935. https:...

    2017 doi

  18. [26]

    Y. Gao, N. Guo, B. Gauvreau, M. Rajabian, O. Skorobogata, E. Pone, O. Zabeida, L. Martinu, C. Dubois, M. Skorobogatiy, Consecutive solvent evaporation and co -rolling techniques for polymer multilayer hollow fiber preform fabrication, Journal of Materi als Research 21 (2006) 2...

    2006

  19. [27]

    Bayindir, A.F

    M. Bayindir, A.F. Abouraddy, O. Shapira, J. Viens, D. Saygin -Hinczewski, F. Sorin, J. Arnold, J.D. Joannopoulos, Y. Fink, Kilometer -Long Ordered Nanophotonic Devices by Preform -to-Fiber Fabrication, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electroni cs 12 (2006) 1202 –121...

    2006

  20. [28]

    Abouraddy, M

    A.F. Abouraddy, M. Bayindir, G. Benoit, S.D. Hart, K. Kuriki, N. Orf, O. Shapira, F. Sorin, B. Temelkuran, Y. Fink, Towards multimaterial multifunctional fibres that see, hear, sense and communicate, Nature Mater 6 (2007) 336–347. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat1889

    2007 doi

  21. [29]

    Strutynski, R.A

    C. Strutynski, R.A. Meza, L. Teulé-Gay, G. El-Dib, A. Poulon-Quintin, J.-P. Salvetat, L. Vellutini, M. Dussauze, T. Cardinal, S. Danto, Stack-and-Draw Applied to the Engineering of Multi-Material Fibers with Non -Cylindrical Profiles, Advanced Function al Materials 31 (2021) 2...

    2021 doi

  22. [30]

    Zhang, C

    B. Zhang, C. Zhai, S. Qi, W. Guo, Z. Yang, A. Yang, X. Gai, Y. Yu, R. Wang, D. Tang, G. Tao, B. Luther-Davies, High -resolution chalcogenide fiber bundles for infrared imaging, Opt. Lett., OL 40 (2015) 4384–4387. https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.40.004384

    2015 doi

  23. [31]

    J. Choi, Q. Zheng, M.E.M.K. Abdelaziz, T. Dysli, D. Bautista -Salinas, A. Leber, S. Jiang, J. Zhang, A.A. Demircali, J. Zhao, Y. Liu, N.W.F. Linton, F. Sorin, X. Jia, E.M. Yeatman, G. -Z. Yang, B. Temelkuran, Thermally Drawn Shape and Stiffness Programm able Fibers for Medical...

    doi

  24. [32]

    Temelkuran, S.D

    B. Temelkuran, S.D. Hart, G. Benoit, J.D. Joannopoulos, Y. Fink, Wavelength -scalable hollow optical fibres with large photonic bandgaps for CO2 laser transmission, Nature 420 (2002) 650 –653. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01275

    2002 doi

  25. [33]

    W. Yan, A. Page, T. Nguyen -Dang, Y. Qu, F. Sordo, L. Wei, F. Sorin, Advanced Multimaterial Electronic and Optoelectronic Fibers and Textiles, Advanced Materials 31 (2019) 1802348. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201802348

    2019 doi

  26. [34]

    Leber, C

    A. Leber, C. Dong, S. Laperrousaz, H. Banerjee, M.E.M.K. Abdelaziz, N. Bartolomei, B. Schyrr, B. Temelkuran, F. Sorin, Highly Integrated Multi-Material Fibers for Soft Robotics, Advanced Science 10 (2023) 2204016. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202204016

    2023 doi

  27. [35]

    Bautista-Salinas, M.E.M.K

    D. Bautista-Salinas, M.E.M.K. Abdelaziz, B. Temelkuran, E.M. Yeatman, C.T. Huins, F. Rodriguez y Baena, Towards a Functional Atraumatic Self -Shaping Cochlear Implant, Macromolecular Materials and Engineering 307 (2022) 2100620. https://doi.org/10.1002/mame.202100620

    2022 doi

  28. [36]

    J. Zhao, Q. Zheng, A.A. Demircali, X. Guo, D. Simon, M. Paraskevaidi, N.W.F. Linton, Z. Takats, M. Kyrgiou, B. Temelkuran, Precise Hybrid -Actuation Robotic Fiber for Enhanced Cervical Disease Treatment, (2024). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2402.10562

    2024 doi arXiv

  29. [37]

    Coulombier, L

    Q. Coulombier, L. Brilland, P. Houizot, T. Chartier, T.N. N’Guyen, F. Smektala, G. Renversez, A. Monteville, D. Méchin, T. Pain, H. Orain, J. -C. Sangleboeuf, J. Trolès, Casting method for producing low-loss chalcogenide microstructured optical fibers, Opt. Express, OE 18 (201...

    2010 doi

  30. [38]

    Zhang, K

    Y. Zhang, K. Li, L. Wang, L. Ren, W. Zhao, R. Miao, M.C.J. Large, M.A. van Eijkelenborg, Casting preforms for microstructured polymer optical fibre fabrication, Opt. Express, OE 14 (2006) 5541–5547. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.14.005541

    2006 doi

  31. [39]

    Yajima, J

    T. Yajima, J. Yamamoto, F. Ishii, T. Hirooka, M. Yoshida, M. Nakazawa, Low -loss photonic crystal fiber fabricated by a slurry casting method, Opt. Express, OE 21 (2013) 30500 –30506. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.21.030500

    2013 doi

  32. [40]

    Abdelaziz, L

    M.E.M.K. Abdelaziz, L. Tian, T. Lottner, S. Reiss, T. Heidt, A. Maier, K. Düring, C. von zur Mühlen, M. Bock, E. Yeatman, G. -Z. Yang, B. Temelkuran, Thermally Drawn Polymeric Catheters for MR - Guided Cardiovascular Intervention, Advanced Science 11 (20 24) 2407704. https://d...

    doi

  33. [41]

    K. Cook, G. Balle, J. Canning, L. Chartier, T. Athanaze, M.A. Hossain, C. Han, J.-E. Comatti, Y. Luo, G.-D. Peng, Step-index optical fiber drawn from 3D printed preforms, Opt. Lett., OL 41 (2016) 4554 –

    2016

  34. [42]

    Toal, L.J

    P.M. Toal, L.J. Holmes, R.X. Rodriguez, E.D. Wetzel, Microstructured monofilament via thermal drawing of additively manufactured preforms, Additive Manufacturing 16 (2017) 12 –23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2017.03.009

    2017 doi

  35. [43]

    Abdelaziz, J

    M.E.M.K. Abdelaziz, J. Zhao, B. Gil Rosa, H.-T. Lee, D. Simon, K. Vyas, B. Li, H. Koguna, Y. Li, A.A. Demircali, H. Uvet, G. Gencoglan, A. Akcay, M. Elriedy, J. Kinross, R. Dasgupta, Z. Takats, E. Yeatman, G.-Z. Yang, B. Temelkuran, Fiberbots: Robotic fibers for high-precision...

    2024 doi

  36. [44]

    G. Loke, R. Yuan, M. Rein, T. Khudiyev, Y. Jain, J. Joannopoulos, Y. Fink, Structured multimaterial filaments for 3D printing of optoelectronics, Nat Commun 10 (2019) 4010. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-11986-0

    2019 doi

  37. [45]

    van der Elst, C

    L. van der Elst, C. Faccini de Lima, M. Gokce Kurtoglu, V.N. Koraganji, M. Zheng, A. Gumennik, 3D Printing in Fiber -Device Technology, Adv. Fiber Mater. 3 (2021) 59 –75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42765-020-00056-6

    2021 doi

  38. [46]

    Aktas, A.A

    A. Aktas, A.A. Demircali, R. Secoli, B. Temelkuran, F. Rodriguez y Baena, Towards a Procedure - Optimised Steerable Catheter for Deep -Seated Neurosurgery, Biomedicines 11 (2023) 2008. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11072008

    2023 doi

  39. [47]

    Talataisong, R

    W. Talataisong, R. Ismaeel, T.H.R. Marques, S. Abokhamis Mousavi, M. Beresna, M.A. Gouveia, S.R. Sandoghchi, T. Lee, C.M.B. Cordeiro, G. Brambilla, Mid-IR Hollow-core microstructured fiber drawn from a 3D printed PETG preform, Sci Rep 8 (2018) 8113. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41...

    2018 doi

  40. [48]

    Carcreff, F

    J. Carcreff, F. Cheviré, E. Galdo, R. Lebullenger, A. Gautier, J.L. Adam, D.L. Coq, L. Brilland, R. Chahal, G. Renversez, J. Troles, Mid-infrared hollow core fiber drawn from a 3D printed chalcogenide glass preform, Opt. Mater. Express, OME 11 (2021) 198–209. https://doi.org/1...

    2021 doi

  41. [49]

    J. Li, K. Nallappan, H. Guerboukha, M. Skorobogatiy, 3D printed hollow core terahertz Bragg waveguides with defect layers for surface sensing applications, Opt. Express, OE 25 (2017) 4126–4144. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.25.004126

    2017 doi

  42. [50]

    Y. Chu, X. Fu, Y. Luo, J. Canning, Y. Tian, K. Cook, J. Zhang, G. -D. Peng, Silica optical fiber drawn from 3D printed preforms, Opt. Lett., OL 44 (2019) 5358–5361. https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.44.005358

    2019 doi

  43. [51]

    Keshavarz, D.J

    M. Keshavarz, D.J. Wales, F. Seichepine, M.E.M.K. Abdelaziz, P. Kassanos, Q. Li, B. Temelkuran, H. Shen, G.-Z. Yang, Induced neural stem cell differentiation on a drawn fiber scaffold—toward peripheral nerve regeneration, Biomed. Mater. 15 (2020) 055011. https://doi.org/10.108...

    2020 doi

  44. [52]

    X. Zhao, Y. Zhou, J. Xu, G. Chen, Y. Fang, T. Tat, X. Xiao, Y. Song, S. Li, J. Chen, Soft fibers with magnetoelasticity for wearable electronics, Nat Commun 12 (2021) 6755. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-27066-1

    2021 doi

  45. [53]

    Xiong, J

    J. Xiong, J. Chen, P.S. Lee, Functional Fibers and Fabrics for Soft Robotics, Wearables, and Human – Robot Interface, Advanced Materials 33 (2021) 2002640. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202002640

    2021 doi

  46. [54]

    Zubel, A

    M.G. Zubel, A. Fasano, G. Woyessa, K. Sugden, H.K. Rasmussen, O. Bang, 3D-printed PMMA Preform for Hollow-core POF Drawing, (n.d.)

  47. [55]

    Matheson, T

    E. Matheson, T. Watts, R. Secoli, F.R. y Baena, Cyclic Motion Control for Programmable Bevel -Tip Needle 3D Steering: A Simulation Study, in: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO), 2018: pp. 444–449. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBIO.2018.8665117

    2018

  48. [56]

    X. Hu, A. Chen, Y. Luo, C. Zhang, E. Zhang, Steerable catheters for minimally invasive surgery: a review and future directions, Computer Assisted Surgery 23 (2018) 21 –41. https://doi.org/10.1080/24699322.2018.1526972

    2018

  49. [57]

    C. Zhou, Z. Xu, Z. Lin, X. Qin, J. Xia, X. Ai, C. Lou, Z. Huang, S. Huang, H. Liu, Y. Zou, W. Chen, G.-Z. Yang, A. Gao, Submillimeter fiber robots capable of decoupled macro -micro motion for endoluminal manipulation, Science Advances 10 (2024) eadr642 8. https://doi.org/10.11...

    2024 doi

  50. [58]

    https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2017.0060

    Body-monitoring with photonic textiles: a reflective heartbeat sensor based on polymer optical fibres, (n.d.). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2017.0060

    2017

  51. [59]

    Jakubowski, W

    K. Jakubowski, W. Kerkemeyer, E. Perret, M. Heuberger, R. Hufenus, Liquid -core polymer optical fibers for luminescent waveguide applications, Materials & Design 196 (2020) 109131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2020.109131

    2020

  52. [60]

    Edelmann, A.J

    J. Edelmann, A.J. Petruska, B.J. Nelson, Estimation -Based Control of a Magnetic Endoscope without Device Localization, J. Med. Robot. Res. 03 (2018) 1850002. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424905X18500022

    2018 doi

  53. [61]

    Acemoglu, D

    A. Acemoglu, D. Pucci, L.S. Mattos, Design and Control of a Magnetic Laser Scanner for Endoscopic Microsurgeries, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics 24 (2019) 527 –537. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMECH.2019.2896248

    2019

  54. [62]

    Z. Ma, Q. Huang, N. Zhou, Q. Zhuang, S.-W. Ng, Z. Zheng, Stretchable and conductive fibers fabricated by a continuous method for wearable devices, Cell Reports Physical Science 4 (2023) 101300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xcrp.2023.101300

    2023

  55. [63]

    Banerjee, A

    H. Banerjee, A. Leber, S. Laperrousaz, R. La Polla, C. Dong, S. Mansour, X. Wan, F. Sorin, Soft Multimaterial Magnetic Fibers and Textiles, Advanced Materials 35 (2023) 2212202. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202212202

    2023 doi

  56. [66]

    Leal-Junior, A

    A. Leal-Junior, A. Frizera, M.J. Pontes, A. Fasano, G. Woyessa, O. Bang, C.A.F. Marques, Dynamic mechanical characterization with respect to temperature, humidity, frequency and strain in mPOFs made of different materials, Opt. Mater. Express 8 (2018) 804. https://doi.org/10.1...

    2018 doi

  57. [67]

    J.-X. Yang, J. Cui, Y.-Y. Long, Y.-G. Li, Y.-S. Li, Synthesis of cyclic olefin polymers with high glass transition temperature by ring -opening metathesis copolymerization and subsequent hydrogenation, Journal of Polymer Science Part A: Polymer Chemist ry 52 (2014) 2654 –2661....

    2014 doi

  58. [68]

    Moon, K.L

    S.H. Moon, K.L. Park, J.W. Baek, H.J. Lee, J. -H. Choi, Y. Lee, B.Y. Lee, Crystallinity in quasi - alternating cycloolefin copolymers: Overcoming brittleness, Journal of Polymer Science 58 (2020) 1253–1261. https://doi.org/10.1002/pol.20200045

    2020 doi

  59. [218]

    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0390-x

    doi

  60. [4557]

    https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.41.004554

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.