Pith. sign in

REVIEW 7 minor 124 references

KOBE-1: The first planetary system from the KOBE survey. Two planets likely residing in the sub-Neptune mass regime around a late K-dwarf

T0 review · 0 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The KOBE survey's first discovery is a K7 dwarf hosting two sub-Neptune-minimum-mass planets at periods of 8.54 and 29.67 days, confirmed by CARMENES radial velocities.

desk verdict Solid two-planet RV detection from a new survey; the lunar-contamination worry is convincingly put to bed. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.01249 v2 pith:G2VIBQEI submitted 2025-02-03 astro-ph.EP

O. Balsalobre-Ruza , J. Lillo-Box , A. M. Silva , S. Grouffal , J. Aceituno , A. Castro-González , C. Cifuentes , M. R. Standing
show 30 more authors
J. P. Faria P. Figueira A. Santerne E. Marfil A. Abreu A. Aguichine L. González-Ramírez J. C. Morales N. Santos N. Huélamo E. Delgado Mena D. Barrado V. Adibekyan S. C. C. Barros Á. Berihuete M. Morales-Calderón E. Nagel E. Solano S. G. Sousa J. F. Agüí Fernández M. Azzaro G. Bergond S. Cikota A. Fernández-Martín J. Flores S. Góngora A. Guijarro I. Hermelo V. Pinter J. I. Vico-Linares
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.EP
keywords exoplanetsradialvelocityK-dwarfstarssub-NeptunesKOBEsurveyCARMENESBayesianmodelcomparisonhabitablezone
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports the first planetary system discovered by the KOBE blind radial-velocity survey: a late K-dwarf (KOBE-1, HIP 5957) hosting two planets with minimum masses of 8.80 and 12.4 Earth masses at periods of 8.54 and 29.67 days. The authors aim to establish that both signals are genuine planets, not stellar activity, instrumental systematics, or lunar contamination, by combining 82 CARMENES spectra over three years with Bayesian model comparison and activity-indicator checks. The result matters because K-dwarfs are prime targets for habitable-zone searches, and this system provides a concrete example of the compact, sub-Neptune-mass population such surveys can uncover. It also demonstrates a path to future atmospheric characterization: the paper argues the proposed LIFE nulling interferometer could detect both planets directly.

What carries the argument

The central machinery is a radial-velocity model with two circular Keplerians plus a quadratic long-term trend, whose parameters are sampled with diffusive nested sampling and with an MCMC ensemble sampler, with model comparison done through Bayesian log-evidence (Bayes factors). Around this core sit the S-BART template-matching RV extraction with nightly zero-point corrections, GLS periodograms to find candidate periods, activity indicators (bisector span, FWHM, differential line width, H-alpha and calcium indices) to reject stellar-activity origins, a Gaussian-process test using the CaIRT2 index as an activity proxy, and a Moon-contamination screening that removes and re-analyses potentially contaminated epochs. The same machinery is reused to compute detection limits in the habitable zone by injecting single Keplerians into the residuals and taking the 99% upper limits, which rules out planets above about 8.5 M_Earth in the conservative HZ.

What would settle it

Continue monitoring KOBE-1 with CARMENES for two more seasons and recompute the 29.671-day signal after excluding every night with Moon illumination above 40% and angular separation below 80 degrees; if the signal's phase and amplitude do not remain coherent with the published ephemeris, or if a comparable 29.53-day signal appears in the RVs of other KOBE targets observed the same nights, the planetary interpretation for the outer signal is wrong.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

KOBE-1 is a relatively quiet K7V star at 23.9 pc that hosts two planets in the sub-Neptune minimum-mass regime. Planet b orbits with period 8.5399 days and semi-amplitude 3.75 m/s, giving m_b sin i_b = 8.80 ± 0.76 M_Earth; planet c orbits with period 29.671 days, semi-amplitude 3.50 m/s, giving m_c sin i_c = 12.4 ± 1.1 M_Earth. The two-circular-Keplerian model is strongly preferred over zero- and one-planet models (ΔlnZ = 9.7 and 7.9), the amplitudes are consistent across four observing seasons, and no activity indicator correlates with the RVs. Under the Exoplanet Confirmation Protocol scheme, the authors classify both as confirmed planets: the probability that either companion exceeds the 13 M_Jup planetary-mass limit is below 0.3%. The 29.7-day signal sits close to the lunar synodic month, but the paper excludes nine Moon-contaminated epochs and shows the signal persists, with a theoretical Moon-induced RV upper limit of about 0.3 m/s, eleven times weaker than the detected signal. A single TESS transit-like dimming in sector 17 is compatible within 1σ with a transit of planet c, but the paper does not claim it as a transit.

Load-bearing premise

The 29.7-day radial-velocity signal is a genuine Keplerian orbit rather than a lunar-synodic-month systematic, even though 29.7 days nearly equals the Moon's 29.53-day synodic period.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • KOBE-1 b and c are confirmed planets with minimum masses of 8.80 ± 0.76 and 12.4 ± 1.1 Earth masses, orbiting at 8.54 and 29.67 days around a K7 dwarf.
  • The KOBE survey's observing strategy works: a blind CARMENES campaign with ~24 points per season can uncover multi-planet systems around late K-dwarfs.
  • No planets with minimum masses above about 8.5 Earth masses remain in the habitable zone of KOBE-1, so the system's HZ is empty at the current sensitivity.
  • The single TESS dimming, if it is a transit of planet c, would imply a radius of 1.69 ± 0.12 R_Earth and a dense super-Earth composition, but the data do not yet justify that claim.
  • The proposed LIFE nulling interferometer could detect both planets directly with integration times of about one hour (planet b) and four hours (planet c) in the baseline super-Earth scenario.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the TESS dimming is later confirmed as a transit of KOBE-1 c, the planet would be a dense super-Earth at low irradiation, a combination that would be difficult to explain by photoevaporation and would test interior-structure models.
  • The near-coincidence between the 29.671-day period and the lunar synodic month suggests that other RV surveys should routinely apply the same Moon-contamination screening; a 29.5-day signal in a single target should be checked against other stars observed the same nights.
  • The KOBE-1 system, with two similar-amplitude planets and a quiet host, is a good benchmark for testing dynamical packing and formation scenarios of sub-Neptunes around low-mass stars.
  • If future seasons push the evidence for a third signal near 18.7 days (half the stellar rotation period), it would indicate that activity harmonics can lurk just below detection thresholds even in quiet K-dwarfs, strengthening the case for GP modeling in such surveys.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 7 minor

Summary. KOBE-1 (HIP 5957) is a K7V dwarf monitored by CARMENES as part of the KOBE survey. Using 82 S-BART radial velocities over 1180 days, the paper reports two periodic signals at P_b = 8.5399 d with K_b = 3.75 ± 0.48 m/s and P_c = 29.671 d with K_c = 3.50 ± 0.45 m/s. The authors model the data with two circular Keplerians plus a quadratic trend and show that Bayesian evidence strongly favors this model over zero- and one-planet alternatives. The signals are stable across four observing seasons, are uncorrelated with activity indicators, and survive the exclusion of potentially Moon-contaminated epochs. The inferred minimum masses are 8.80 ± 0.76 M⊕ and 12.4 ± 1.1 M⊕, placing the companions in the planetary-mass regime with high probability. A single transit-like feature in TESS is analyzed but not claimed as a transit, and injection-recovery is used to set sensitivity limits inside the habitable zone. The paper closes with LIFE simulation-based predictions for future direct-imaging characterization.

Significance. This is a solid, carefully analyzed RV discovery and the first planetary system from the KOBE survey. Its main strength is cross-validation: the signals appear in independent extractions (S-BART, serval, SHAQ), in two Bayesian frameworks (kima and radvel with bayev), in seasonal amplitude checks, and in activity diagnostics including a Gaussian-process treatment. The authors are appropriately cautious about the ambiguous TESS feature and about the lunar alias, and the injection-recovery sensitivity analysis is reproducible with public tools. The system is scientifically valuable as a relatively quiet late-K dwarf hosting two sub-Neptune-minimum-mass planets, and the LIFE integration-time estimates are falsifiable predictions for future missions. I find no load-bearing technical error in the detection claim, and the presentation is generally transparent and conservative.

minor comments (7)
  1. [5.1] The formal classification of the two signals as "confirmed planets" relies on the Exoplanet Confirmation Protocol of Lillo-Box et al. (in prep.), which is not publicly available; please cite a public version or state the adopted criteria explicitly so that the classification is independently checkable.
  2. [Abstract and 5.3] The abstract states that planets above 8.5 M⊕ are discarded within the habitable zone, whereas Section 5.3 reports sensitivity of about 8.5 M⊕ at 90-105 d for the conservative HZ and about 7.6 M⊕ at about 80 d for the optimistic HZ; this wording should be rephrased to avoid implying a uniform mass limit across the full HZ.
  3. [Appendix B] The lunar-contamination discussion is convincing, but a periodogram or RMS of the nightly zero-point time series itself would close the residual channel of a Moon-induced systematic in the NZPs; the current survey-wide control is reassuring yet indirect.
  4. [4.1.2] There is a typo: "both √e cosω and √e cosω" should read "both √e cosω and √e sinω."
  5. [2.1 and Introduction] Minor typographical errors should be corrected: "signal to noise natio" (Section 2.1), "photomery" (Introduction), and "for for their whole domain" (Section 4.1.2).
  6. [Fig. 1] The evidence comparison in Figure 1 is difficult to parse because multiple ΔlnZ values are plotted without a clear statement of the reference model in the caption; please make the reference model and the sign convention explicit.
  7. [Title and 5.2] The title's "sub-Neptune mass regime" is stronger than Section 5.2's conclusion that the minimum masses are compatible with either the super-Earth or sub-Neptune populations; consider a wording such as "super-Earth/sub-Neptune mass regime."

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: the planetary parameters are outputs of the RV fit, not inputs, and every ancillary claim is either independently checked or explicitly scenario-dependent.

full rationale

The central claim that KOBE-1 hosts two planets with P=8.54 d and P=29.67 d and minimum masses 8.80±0.76 M⊕ and 12.4±1.1 M⊕ is a direct fit to 82 CARMENES RVs; the periods, semi-amplitudes, and masses are posterior outputs, never assumed inputs. The two-planet model is preferred over lower-complexity models by ΔlnZ ≈ 7.9–10.9 computed with two independent samplers (kima and radvel/bayev), and the same periodicities are recovered from independent pipelines (serval and SHAQ, Appendix A). The non-planetary alternatives are excluded with in-paper evidence: activity indicators show no correlation (Pearson/Spearman |R|<0.25), the GP activity amplitude collapses to zero, and the 37.4 d rotation period and its harmonic are not present at the planetary periods. The 29.7 d signal's proximity to the lunar synodic month is explicitly handled in Appendix B: nine potentially contaminated epochs are removed, the contaminated subset shows no 29.7 d peak, other KOBE targets show no such periodicity, and the Cunha et al. (2013) upper limit of 0.3 m/s is eleven times smaller than Kc. Sensitivity limits are derived by injection-recovery into residuals verified to contain no remaining signals, so they are measured quantities, not circular predictions. The single TESS dimming is explicitly treated as uncertain and the joint MCMC does not prefer the transiting hypothesis (Appendix C); it is not used as a load-bearing confirmation. LIFE integration times are explicitly scenario-dependent, assuming model radii for super-Earth and mini-Neptune cases, so they are illustrative prospects, not fitted predictions. Self-citations (SHAQ, S-BART, KOBE survey, ECP in prep.) are methodological or terminological; the ECP's three generic principles are restated and each is evaluated with quantitative evidence inside this paper, so the self-citation is not load-bearing. No equation in the chain is equivalent to its own input by construction; the paper is a self-contained data-driven detection.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard Keplerian fitting with two nuisance parameters (trend and jitter) plus empirical stellar parameters. No new physical entities are introduced. The main assumptions are the usual ones for RV planet confirmation: that the signals are planetary rather than activity/systematic, and that the stellar parameters are accurate.

free parameters (3)
  • RV jitter (sigma_jit) = 2.17 +0.34 -0.32 m/s
    Added in quadrature to account for stellar/instrumental noise beyond quoted errors. It is fitted in both the kima and radvel models and affects the posterior widths of the planetary parameters.
  • Quadratic trend slope m = -7.2e-3 ± 3.2e-3 m/s/d
    Long-term acceleration term in the RV model. It is a free parameter fitted to the data and could absorb low-frequency signals, though the two short-period signals are robust to its inclusion.
  • Quadratic trend coefficient q = -7.6e-6 ± 2.6e-6 m/s/d^2
    Curvature term of the long-term trend. Fitted alongside m to describe the observed RV drift over the 1180-day baseline.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The two RV signals are Keplerian and not due to stellar activity or instrumental systematics.
    The paper tests activity indicators, GP models, and Moon contamination to support this, but it cannot be proven absolutely. This is the core assumption for any RV planet detection.
  • domain assumption The stellar mass and radius derived from empirical relations (Schweitzer 2019) and SED fitting are correct.
    Planet minimum masses scale as M_star^(2/3) times K and P. The paper adopts M_star = 0.629 ± 0.017 Msun and R_star = 0.619 ± 0.011 Rsun; errors in these propagate to the derived planetary masses.
  • domain assumption KOBE-1 is single and the signals are not caused by a blended binary.
    Checked via Gaia RUWE, CCF shape, and lack of BIS/FWHM correlations, but unresolved companions cannot be fully excluded. A blended binary could mimic a planet signal.
  • domain assumption The CARMENES nightly zero-point corrections (S-BART NZPs) are accurate.
    The final RV time series depends on NZP subtraction. The paper shows S-BART NZPs are more precise than serval or SHAQ, but it assumes they are also accurate.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of KOBE-1: The first planetary system from the KOBE survey. Two planets likely residing in the sub-Neptune mass regime around a late K-dwarf." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/G2VIBQEI

@misc{pith2026250201249,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: KOBE-1: The first planetary system from the KOBE survey. Two planets likely residing in the sub-Neptune mass regime around a late K-dwarf},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/G2VIBQEI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.01249}
}
read the original abstract

K-dwarf stars are promising targets in the exploration of potentially habitable planets. Their properties, falling between G and M dwarfs, provide an optimal trade-off between the prospect of habitability and ease of detection. The KOBE experiment is a blind-search survey exploiting this niche, monitoring the radial velocity of 50 late-type K-dwarf stars. It employs the CARMENES spectrograph, with an observational strategy designed to detect planets in the habitable zone of their system. In this work, we exploit the KOBE data set to characterize planetary signals in the K7V star HIP 5957 (KOBE-1) and to constrain the planetary population within its habitable zone. We used 82 CARMENES spectra over a time span of three years. We employed a GLS periodogram to search for significant periodic signals that would be compatible with Keplerian motion on KOBE-1. We carried out a model comparison within a Bayesian framework to ensure the significance of the planetary model over alternative configurations of lower complexity. We also inspected two available TESS sectors in search of planetary signals. We identified two signals: at 8.5d and 29.7d. We confirmed their planetary nature through ruling out other non-planetary configurations. Their minimum masses are 8.80+/-0.76ME and 12.4+/-1.1ME, corresponding to absolute masses within the planetary regime at a high certainty (>99.7%). By analyzing the sensitivity of the CARMENES time series to additional signals, we discarded planets above 8.5ME within the habitable zone. We identified a single transit-like feature in TESS, whose origin is still uncertain, but still compatible within 1sigma with a transit from planet c. We have explored future prospects for characterizing this system, concluding that nulling interferometry with the LIFE mission could be capable of directly imaging both planets and characterizing their atmospheres in future studies.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.01249 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Comparison of the logarithm of the Bayesian evidence (ln Z) for the tested RV models. The evidence difference (∆ ln Z) with the best model, or Bayes Factor (BF), is shown at the top of the bar for each model. In grey are displayed different ∆ ln Z from the 2p1c2c model marking the strong evidence against competing models. region of the parameter space around the maximum a posteriori solution from the first phase (as… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. S-BART RV time series (top panel, purple dots) and phase-folded for both planets separately (blue dots in middle-left panel for KOBE-1 b, and green dots in the middle-right panel for KOBE-1 c). The quadratic trend, and the model of the other planet when plotted in phase (middle panels), are subtracted from the RVs. The best model is shown as a solid line, with shaded background regions representing 1- and 2σ confide… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. TESS light curves of the first half of sector 17 (before the down-link gap) for KOBE-1. The shaded regions represent the 68.7% (light) and 95% (dark) confidence intervals for the conjunction time of KOBE-1 b (blue) and KOBE-1 c (green) according to the RV analysis in Sect. 4.1. The vertical dotted lines correspond to the median of the expected transit time for each planet, while the vertical dashed red line indicate… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Evolution of the difference between the evidence of the two￾planet model and the zero-planet model as a function of the number of data points (dark blue solid line and symbols, corresponding to the lower X-axis) and against the time from the first observation (light bl…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Hexbin plot showing the posterior samples obtained from kima runs on the KOBE-1 RV data with Np fixed to 1. The blue line shows the 99% detection limit line, whereas the red line shows the same line computed on a subset of posterior samples with eccentricity < 0.1. The…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

124 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archiveprefix author booktitle chapter edition editor howpublished institution eprint journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type volume year label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts #0 'before.all := #1 ...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in " " * FUNCTION format....

  3. [3]

    2021, , 914, 84

    Aguichine , A., Mousis , O., Deleuil , M., & Marcq , E. 2021, , 914, 84

    2021

  4. [4]

    L., Chen , X., Ciardi , D., et al

    Akeson , R. L., Chen , X., Ciardi , D., et al. 2013, , 125, 989

    2013

  5. [5]

    2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A, 370, 2765

    Allard , F., Homeier , D., & Freytag , B. 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A, 370, 2765

    2012

  6. [6]

    2024, , 690, A190

    Aller , A., Lillo-Box , J., & Jones , D. 2024, , 690, A190

    2024

  7. [7]

    F., & Barcel \'o Forteza , S

    Aller , A., Lillo-Box , J., Jones , D., Miranda , L. F., & Barcel \'o Forteza , S. 2020, , 635, A128

    2020

  8. [8]

    W., & O'Neil , M

    Ambikasaran , S., Foreman-Mackey , D., Greengard , L., Hogg , D. W., & O'Neil , M. 2015, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 38, 252

    2015

Show all 124 references
  1. [9]

    Arney , G. N. 2019, , 873, L7

    2019

  2. [10]

    M., Sip o cz , B

    Astropy Collaboration , Price-Whelan , A. M., Sip o cz , B. M., et al. 2018, , 156, 123

    2018

  3. [11]

    P., Tollerud , E

    Astropy Collaboration , Robitaille , T. P., Tollerud , E. J., et al. 2013, , 558, A33

    2013

  4. [12]

    Baraffe , I., Chabrier , G., Allard , F., & Hauschildt , P. H. 1998, , 337, 403

    1998

  5. [13]

    1996, , 119, 373

    Baranne , A., Queloz , D., Mayor , M., et al. 1996, , 119, 373

    1996

  6. [14]

    F., Zechmeister , M., & Reiners , A

    Bauer , F. F., Zechmeister , M., & Reiners , A. 2015, , 581, A117

    2015

  7. [15]

    2008, , 492, 277

    Bayo , A., Rodrigo , C., Barrado y Navascu \'e s , D., et al. 2008, , 492, 277

    2008

  8. [16]

    2022, , 936, 55

    Beard , C., Robertson , P., Kanodia , S., et al. 2022, , 936, 55

    2022

  9. [17]

    2005, , 443, L15

    Bonfils , X., Forveille , T., Delfosse , X., et al. 2005, , 443, L15

    2005

  10. [18]

    S., Dumusque , X., Massa , A., et al

    Bonomo , A. S., Dumusque , X., Massa , A., et al. 2023, , 677, A33

    2023

  11. [19]

    J., Koch , D., Basri , G., et al

    Borucki , W. J., Koch , D., Basri , G., et al. 2010, Science, 327, 977

    2010

  12. [20]

    J., P \'a rtay , L

    Brewer , B. J., P \'a rtay , L. B., & Cs \'a nyi , G. 2010, DNEST: Diffusive Nested Sampling , Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1010.029

    2010

  13. [21]

    2000, Meteoritics & Planetary Science, 35, 892

    Briggs , G. 2000, Meteoritics & Planetary Science, 35, 892

    2000

  14. [22]

    L., Jeffers , S

    Brown , E. L., Jeffers , S. V., Marsden , S. C., et al. 2022, , 514, 4300

    2022

  15. [23]

    2023, , 678, A96

    Carri \'o n-Gonz \'a lez , \'O ., Kammerer , J., Angerhausen , D., et al. 2023, , 678, A96

    2023

  16. [24]

    Castro-Gonz \'a lez , A., Demangeon , O. D. S., Lillo-Box , J., et al. 2023, , 675, A52

    2023

  17. [25]

    2022, , 509, 1075

    Castro-Gonz \'a lez , A., D \' ez Alonso , E., Men \'e ndez Blanco , J., et al. 2022, , 509, 1075

    2022

  18. [26]

    J., et al

    Castro-Gonz \'a lez , A., Lillo-Box , J., Armstrong , D. J., et al. 2024, , 691, A233

    2024

  19. [27]

    A., Cort \'e s-Contreras , M., et al

    Cifuentes , C., Caballero , J. A., Cort \'e s-Contreras , M., et al. 2020, , 642, A115

    2020

  20. [28]

    A., González-Payo, J., et al

    Cifuentes, C., Caballero, J. A., González-Payo, J., et al. 2024 [ [arXiv] 2412.12264 ]

    2024 arXiv

  21. [29]

    2014, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol

    Cosentino , R., Lovis , C., Pepe , F., et al. 2014, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 9147, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, 8

    2014

  22. [30]

    C., Lovis , C., & Bou \'e , G

    Cunha , D., Figueira , P., Santos , N. C., Lovis , C., & Bou \'e , G. 2013, , 550, A75

    2013

  23. [31]

    & Guinan , E

    Cuntz , M. & Guinan , E. F. 2016, , 827, 79

    2016

  24. [32]

    M., Skrutskie , M

    Cutri , R. M., Skrutskie , M. F., van Dyk , S., et al. 2003, VizieR Online Data Catalog: 2MASS All-Sky Catalog of Point Sources (Cutri+ 2003) , VizieR On-line Data Catalog: II/246. Originally published in: 2003yCat.2246....0C

    2003

  25. [33]

    A., Ottiger , M., Quanz , S

    Dannert , F. A., Ottiger , M., Quanz , S. P., et al. 2022, , 664, A22

    2022

  26. [34]

    B., S \'e gransan , D., Buchschacher , N., & Alesina , F

    Delisle , J. B., S \'e gransan , D., Buchschacher , N., & Alesina , F. 2016, , 590, A134

    2016

  27. [35]

    F., S \'e gransan , D., Udry , S., et al

    D \' az , R. F., S \'e gransan , D., Udry , S., et al. 2016, , 585, A134

    2016

  28. [36]

    2017, , 598, A133

    Dumusque , X., Borsa , F., Damasso , M., et al. 2017, , 598, A133

    2017

  29. [37]

    S., & Agol , E

    Eastman , J., Gaudi , B. S., & Agol , E. 2013, , 125, 83

    2013

  30. [38]

    1997, ESA Special Publication, Vol

    ESA , ed. 1997, ESA Special Publication, Vol. 1200, The HIPPARCOS and TYCHO catalogues. Astrometric and photometric star catalogues derived from the ESA HIPPARCOS Space Astrometry Mission

    1997

  31. [39]

    & Jord \'a n , A

    Espinoza , N. & Jord \'a n , A. 2015, , 450, 1879

    2015

  32. [40]

    P., Santos , N

    Faria , J. P., Santos , N. C., Figueira , P., & Brewer , B. J. 2018, The Journal of Open Source Software, 3, 487

    2018

  33. [41]

    P., Su \'a rez Mascare \ n o , A., Figueira , P., et al

    Faria , J. P., Su \'a rez Mascare \ n o , A., Figueira , P., et al. 2022, , 658, A115

    2022

  34. [42]

    W., Lang , D., & Goodman , J

    Foreman-Mackey , D., Hogg , D. W., Lang , D., & Goodman , J. 2013, , 125, 306

    2013

  35. [43]

    J., Petigura , E

    Fulton , B. J., Petigura , E. A., Blunt , S., & Sinukoff , E. 2018, , 130, 044504

    2018

  36. [44]

    J., Petigura , E

    Fulton , B. J., Petigura , E. A., Howard , A. W., et al. 2017, , 154, 109

    2017

  37. [45]

    Gaia Collaboration , Brown , A. G. A., Vallenari , A., et al. 2018, , 616, A1

    2018

  38. [46]

    W., Lépine, S., et al

    Gaidos, E., Mann, A. W., Lépine, S., et al. 2014, , 443, 2561

    2014

  39. [47]

    Y., Persson , C

    Georgieva , I. Y., Persson , C. M., Goffo , E., et al. 2023, , 674, A117

    2023

  40. [48]

    1969, Veroeffentlichungen des Astronomischen Rechen-Instituts Heidelberg, 22, 1

    Gliese, W. 1969, Veroeffentlichungen des Astronomischen Rechen-Instituts Heidelberg, 22, 1

    1969

  41. [49]

    2018, The Journal of Open Source Software, 3, 667

    Gomes da Silva , J., Figueira , P., Santos , N., & Faria , J. 2018, The Journal of Open Source Software, 3, 667

    2018

  42. [50]

    O., Corbally, C

    Gray, R. O., Corbally, C. J., Garrison, R. F., McFadden, M. T., & Robinson, P. E. 2003, , 126, 2048

    2003

  43. [51]

    2014, TelFit: Fitting the telluric absorption spectrum , Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1405.002

    Gullikson , K. 2014, TelFit: Fitting the telluric absorption spectrum , Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1405.002

    2014

  44. [52]

    F., Armstrong , D

    Hacker , A., D \' az , R. F., Armstrong , D. J., et al. 2024, , 532, 1612

    2024

  45. [53]

    R., Millman, K

    Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., et al. 2020, Nature, 585, 357

    2020

  46. [54]

    D., Collier Cameron , A., Queloz , D., et al

    Haywood , R. D., Collier Cameron , A., Queloz , D., et al. 2014, , 443, 2517

    2014

  47. [55]

    2019, , 625, A31

    Heller , R., Rodenbeck , K., & Hippke , M. 2019, , 625, A31

    2019

  48. [56]

    2023, , 674, A25

    Holl , B., Fabricius , C., Portell , J., et al. 2023, , 674, A25

    2023

  49. [57]

    S., Naderi, F

    Hubbard, G. S., Naderi, F. M., & Garvin, J. B. 2002, Acta Astronaut, 51, 337

    2002

  50. [58]

    Hunter, J. D. 2007, Computing in Science & Engineering, 9, 90

    2007

  51. [59]

    & Fischer , D

    Isaacson , H. & Fischer , D. 2010, , 725, 875

    2010

  52. [60]

    M., Twicken , J

    Jenkins , J. M., Twicken , J. D., McCauliff , S., et al. 2016, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 9913, Software and Cyberinfrastructure for Astronomy IV, ed. G. Chiozzi & J. C. Guzman , 99133E

    2016

  53. [61]

    A., Collier Cameron , A., Faria , J

    John , A. A., Collier Cameron , A., Faria , J. P., et al. 2023, , 525, 1687

    2023

  54. [62]

    P., Dannert , F., & LIFE Collaboration

    Kammerer , J., Quanz , S. P., Dannert , F., & LIFE Collaboration . 2022, , 668, A52

    2022

  55. [63]

    Kass , R. E. & Raftery , A. E. 1995, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 773–795

    1995

  56. [64]

    F., Whitmire , D

    Kasting , J. F., Whitmire , D. P., & Reynolds , R. T. 1993, , 101, 108

    1993

  57. [65]

    2023, , 674, A5

    Katz , D., Sartoretti , P., Guerrier , A., et al. 2023, , 674, A5

    2023

  58. [66]

    2010, , 403, 1949

    Koen, C., Kilkenny, D., van Wyk, F., & Marang, F. 2010, , 403, 1949

    2010

  59. [67]

    K., Ramirez , R., Kasting , J

    Kopparapu , R. K., Ramirez , R., Kasting , J. F., et al. 2013, , 765, 131

    2013

  60. [68]

    2015, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 127, 1161

    Kreidberg , L. 2015, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 127, 1161

    2015

  61. [69]

    1980, Journal of Hydrology, 46

    Kumaraswamy , P. 1980, Journal of Hydrology, 46

    1980

  62. [70]

    & Matthews , J

    Kunimoto , M. & Matthews , J. M. 2020, , 159, 248

    2020

  63. [71]

    2020, , 636, A36

    Lafarga , M., Ribas , I., Lovis , C., et al. 2020, , 636, A36

    2020

  64. [72]

    & Lissauer, J

    Lecavelier des Etangs , A. & Lissauer, J. J. 2022, New Astronomy Reviews, 94, 101641

    2022

  65. [73]

    Lightkurve Collaboration , Cardoso , J. V. d. M., Hedges , C., et al. 2018, Lightkurve: Kepler and TESS time series analysis in Python , Astrophysics Source Code Library

    2018

  66. [74]

    P., Su \'a rez Mascare \ n o , A., et al

    Lillo-Box , J., Faria , J. P., Su \'a rez Mascare \ n o , A., et al. 2021 a , , 654, A60

    2021

  67. [75]

    P., Su \'a rez Mascare \ n o , A., et al

    Lillo-Box , J., Faria , J. P., Su \'a rez Mascare \ n o , A., et al. 2021 b , , 654, A60

    2021

  68. [76]

    2020, , 642, A121

    Lillo-Box , J., Figueira , P., Leleu , A., et al. 2020, , 642, A121

    2020

  69. [77]

    C., Santerne , A., et al

    Lillo-Box , J., Santos , N. C., Santerne , A., et al. 2022, , 667, A102

    2022

  70. [78]

    2018, , 616, A2

    Lindegren , L., Hern \'a ndez , J., Bombrun , A., et al. 2018, , 616, A2

    2018

  71. [79]

    A., Sasselov , D., Hernquist , L., & Stewart , S

    Marcus , R. A., Sasselov , D., Hernquist , L., & Stewart , S. T. 2010, , 712, L73

    2010

  72. [80]

    M., Montes , D., et al

    Marfil , E., Tabernero , H. M., Montes , D., et al. 2021, , 656, A162

    2021

  73. [81]

    2010, , 520, A79

    Mart\'inez-Arn\'aiz, R., Maldonado, J., Montes, D., Eiroa, C., & Montesinos, B. 2010, , 520, A79

    2010

  74. [82]

    J., & G \'a lvez , M

    Montes , D., L \'o pez-Santiago , J., Fern \'a ndez-Figueroa , M. J., & G \'a lvez , M. C. 2001, , 379, 976

    2001

  75. [83]

    & Collier Cameron , A

    Mortier , A. & Collier Cameron , A. 2017, , 601, A110

    2017

  76. [84]

    G., Adibekyan , V

    Mortier , A., Sousa , S. G., Adibekyan , V. Z., Brand \ a o , I. M., & Santos , N. C. 2014, , 572, A95

    2014

  77. [85]

    W., Weiss , N

    Noyes , R. W., Weiss , N. O., & Vaughan , A. H. 1984, , 287, 769

    1984

  78. [86]

    Osborne , H. L. M., Van Eylen , V., Goffo , E., et al. 2024, , 527, 11138

    2024

  79. [87]

    A., Mortier , A., et al

    Palethorpe , L., John , A. A., Mortier , A., et al. 2024, , 529, 3323

    2024

  80. [88]

    M., Su \'a rez Mascare \ n o , A., Allart , R., et al

    Passegger , V. M., Su \'a rez Mascare \ n o , A., Allart , R., et al. 2024, , 684, A22

    2024

  81. [89]

    2021, , 645, A96

    Pepe , F., Cristiani , S., Rebolo , R., et al. 2021, , 645, A96

    2021

  82. [90]

    2011, , 534, A58

    Pepe , F., Lovis , C., S \'e gransan , D., et al. 2011, , 534, A58

    2011

  83. [91]

    Perrakis , K., Ntzoufras , I., & Tsionas , E. G. 2014, Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 77, 54

    2014

  84. [92]

    \' A ., & Lindegren, L

    Perryman, M., Hartman, J., Bakos, G. \' A ., & Lindegren, L. 2014, The Astrophysical Journal, 797, 14

    2014

  85. [93]

    S., Lubin , J., Beard , C., et al

    Polanski , A. S., Lubin , J., Beard , C., et al. 2024, , 272, 32

    2024

  86. [94]

    2016, , 87, 141

    Poretti , E., Boccato , C., Claudi , R., et al. 2016, , 87, 141

    2016

  87. [95]

    2022, Gaia DR3 documentation Chapter 7: Non-single stars , Gaia DR3 documentation, European Space Agency; Gaia Data Processing and Analysis Consortium

    Pourbaix , D., Arenou , F., Gavras , P., et al. 2022, Gaia DR3 documentation Chapter 7: Non-single stars , Gaia DR3 documentation, European Space Agency; Gaia Data Processing and Analysis Consortium. Online at <A href=``https://gea.esac.esa.int/archive/documentation/GDR3/index...

    2022

  88. [96]

    P., Ottiger , M., Fontanet , E., et al

    Quanz , S. P., Ottiger , M., Fontanet , E., et al. 2022 a , , 664, A21

    2022

  89. [97]

    P., Ottiger , M., Fontanet , E., et al

    Quanz , S. P., Ottiger , M., Fontanet , E., et al. 2022 b , , 664, A21

    2022

  90. [98]

    J., Caballero , J

    Quirrenbach , A., Amado , P. J., Caballero , J. A., et al. 2014, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 9147, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, 1

    2014

  91. [99]

    A., Reece , S., & Roberts , S

    Rajpaul , V., Aigrain , S., Osborne , M. A., Reece , S., & Roberts , S. 2015, , 452, 2269

    2015

  92. [100]

    N., Hawley , S

    Reid , I. N., Hawley , S. L., & Gizis , J. E. 1995, , 110, 1838

    1995

  93. [101]

    A., et al

    Reiners , A., Zechmeister , M., Caballero , J. A., et al. 2018, , 612, A49

    2018

  94. [102]

    2023, , 670, A139

    Ribas , I., Reiners , A., Zechmeister , M., et al. 2023, , 670, A139

    2023

  95. [103]

    R., Winn , J

    Ricker , G. R., Winn , J. N., Vanderspek , R., et al. 2014, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 9143, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, 20

    2014

  96. [104]

    Rutten , R. G. M. 1984, , 130, 353

    1984

  97. [105]

    M., Cifuentes , C., et al

    Schweitzer , A., Passegger , V. M., Cifuentes , C., et al. 2019, , 625, A68

    2019

  98. [106]

    J., Prieto , J

    Shappee , B. J., Prieto , J. L., Grupe , D., et al. 2014, , 788, 48

    2014

  99. [107]

    M., Faria , J

    Silva , A. M., Faria , J. P., Santos , N. C., et al. 2022, , 663, A143

    2022

  100. [108]

    R., Sairam , L., Martin , D

    Standing , M. R., Sairam , L., Martin , D. V., et al. 2023, Nature Astronomy, 7, 702

    2023

  101. [109]

    R., Triaud , A

    Standing , M. R., Triaud , A. H. M. J., Faria , J. P., et al. 2022, , 511, 3571

    2022

  102. [110]

    G., Oelkers , R

    Stassun , K. G., Oelkers , R. J., Paegert , M., et al. 2019, , 158, 138

    2019

  103. [111]

    M., Gonz \'a lez Hern \'a ndez , J

    Su \'a rez Mascare \ n o , A., Passegger , V. M., Gonz \'a lez Hern \'a ndez , J. I., et al. 2024, , 685, A56

    2024

  104. [112]

    Su \'a rez Mascare \ n o , A., Rebolo , R., & Gonz \'a lez Hern \'a ndez , J. I. 2016, , 595, A12

    2016

  105. [113]

    I., & Esposito , M

    Su \'a rez Mascare \ n o , A., Rebolo , R., Gonz \'a lez Hern \'a ndez , J. I., & Esposito , M. 2017, , 468, 4772

    2017

  106. [114]

    M., Marfil , E., Montes , D., & Gonz \'a lez Hern \'a ndez , J

    Tabernero , H. M., Marfil , E., Montes , D., & Gonz \'a lez Hern \'a ndez , J. I. 2022, , 657, A66

    2022

  107. [115]

    2019, dfitspy: A dfits/fitsort implementation in Python , Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1904.017

    Thomas , R. 2019, dfitspy: A dfits/fitsort implementation in Python , Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1904.017

    2019

  108. [116]

    2018, , 609, A117

    Trifonov , T., K \"u rster , M., Zechmeister , M., et al. 2018, , 609, A117

    2018

  109. [117]

    2019, , 622, A37

    Udry , S., Dumusque , X., Lovis , C., et al. 2019, , 622, A37

    2019

  110. [118]

    2012, in Conference on Intelligent Data Understanding (CIDU), 47 --54

    Vanderplas , J., Connolly , A., Ivezi \'c , Z ., & Gray , A. 2012, in Conference on Intelligent Data Understanding (CIDU), 47 --54

    2012

  111. [119]

    E., et al

    Virtanen , P., Gommers , R., Oliphant , T. E., et al. 2020, Nature Methods, 17, 261

    2020

  112. [120]

    & Kochanek , C

    Winecki , D. & Kochanek , C. S. 2024, , 971, 61

    2024

  113. [121]

    2014, , 561, A59

    Zechmeister , M., Anglada-Escud \'e , G., & Reiners , A. 2014, , 561, A59

    2014

  114. [122]

    & K \"u rster , M

    Zechmeister , M. & K \"u rster , M. 2009, , 496, 577

    2009

  115. [123]

    J., et al

    Zechmeister , M., Reiners , A., Amado , P. J., et al. 2018, , 609, A12

    2018

  116. [124]

    B., Sasselov , D

    Zeng , L., Jacobsen , S. B., Sasselov , D. D., et al. 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 116, 9723

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.