Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

XR-VIO: High-precision Visual Inertial Odometry with Fast Initialization for XR Applications

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that VIO initialization becomes fast, accurate, and robust when gyroscope rotation is tightly coupled into visual structure from motion, allowing stable startup from just four image frames and outperforming existing…

desk verdict Solid, incremental VIO engineering that overstates its 4-frame initialization success because 'success' means only that a pose was produced, not that it was usable. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.01297 v1 pith:JICV4SUC submitted 2025-02-03 cs.CV

Shangjin Zhai , Nan Wang , Xiaomeng Wang , Danpeng Chen , Weijian Xie , Hujun Bao , Guofeng Zhang This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CV
keywords visual-inertialodometryVIOinitializationstructurefrommotiongyroscopetightcouplinghybridfeaturematchingopticalflowdescriptoraugmentedreality
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper aims to show that visual-inertial odometry (VIO) initialization, a step that usually needs many frames or fragile multi-point structure from motion, can be made fast, accurate, and robust by feeding gyroscope rotation directly into the visual reconstruction. The proposed pipeline, VG-SfM, treats the integrated gyro measurement as the known rotation in two-view reconstruction, PnP, and bundle adjustment, reducing the relative pose to two translation degrees of freedom. The authors report that this initialization works with as few as four image frames (0.3 seconds of data), achieving 83.98% success and the lowest scale, ATE, and gravity errors among compared methods on EuRoC. They also introduce a hybrid feature matcher that uses optical flow as a prior for ORB descriptor matching, which increases track length while keeping drift low. A sympathetic reader would care because fast, low-latency initialization is what lets AR/VR apps start tracking within milliseconds on mobile devices.

What carries the argument

The central object is VG-SfM (Visual-Gyroscope tightly coupled Structure from Motion), a three-stage pipeline in which rotation from gyroscope pre-integration is used as a hard prior throughout the visual reconstruction. In two-view reconstruction, known rotation turns the relative pose problem into a linear 2-DoF translation estimation solved by 2-Point-RANSAC; VG-PnP adds the gyro pre-integration cost to the 3D-2D pose residual; and VG-BA jointly optimizes poses, 3D points, and gyro bias with both reprojection and gyro pre-integration cost terms. This tight coupling is what removes the fragile 5-point relative pose step and lets the SfM survive with only four frames. A supporting mechanism is the disparity-dependent weighting in VI-BA, which up-weights the visual term when parallax is large enough (threshold 20 pixels) so the IMU degrees of freedom do not dominate when parallax is small.

What would settle it

Run the 4KF initialization on sequences where the gyroscope bias is deliberately mis-calibrated, or the device is strongly vibrated, so that the integrated rotation drifts by more than a few degrees over 0.3 seconds; if the success rate or scale error degrades substantially compared with the EuRoC results, the gyro-as-ground-truth assumption is falsified. A direct test is to compare the 2-point relative pose translation accuracy with a 5-point solver on the same fragments while perturbing gyro bias; the 2-point method should win only as long as the gyro rotation error stays small.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that tightly coupling gyroscope measurements into visual structure from motion, rather than using the gyroscope only after a purely visual reconstruction, stabilizes VIO initialization in short fragments with small parallax. In VG-SfM, the integrated gyroscope rotation supplies the rotation in a 2-point relative pose solver, and the gyroscope pre-integration cost is added to PnP (VG-PnP) and bundle adjustment (VG-BA), which also estimates gyro bias. After this, the accelerometer is coupled loosely in a linear alignment (VA-Align) to recover scale, velocity, and gravity, and a disparity-dependent weighted VI-BA refines everything together. The authors claim that this scheme robustly handles complex scenarios and demonstrates stable performance even with only four image frames, reporting on EuRoC a 4KF scale error of 26.88%, ATE of 0.026 m, gravity error of 2.26 degrees, and success rate of 83.98%; the complete system achieves an average EuRoC trajectory ATE of 0.107 m.

Load-bearing premise

The whole scheme rests on the assumption that a consumer-grade gyroscope gives accurate rotation over short intervals, around 0.3 seconds, even without calibrated bias, so the gyro rotation can be treated as a reliable known quantity during SfM.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Initialization time drops to 0.3 seconds and four keyframes, an enabler for AR/VR apps that need tracking within milliseconds of launch.
  • The gyro-tight SfM profits from rotation information even in low-parallax fragments where 5-point SfM is fragile; the paper reports an 83.98% 4KF success rate, well above the best compared loosely coupled baseline's 47.34%.
  • Hybrid matching (optical flow prior plus ORB in a 10-pixel search window) roughly doubles track length relative to descriptor-only matching while keeping epipolar error below the optical-flow baseline.
  • The complete system reports an average EuRoC trajectory ATE of 0.107 m, the lowest among the feature-matching VIO systems compared, and runs in real time on mobile phones.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The gyro-tight SfM idea could be applied to pure-rotation or nearly degenerate visual configurations, which the paper itself lists as limitations; replacing fragile visual rotation estimation with gyro rotation may extend VIO robustness there.
  • The disparity-dependent weighting of the visual term suggests a general guideline: when parallax is low, the IMU cost should not be allowed to dominate, or the optimizer will fit IMU noise and distort the map.
  • Because the initializer does not require calibrated gyro bias, it may tolerate per-device bias drift, but this is not tested; a natural check is to re-run the initializer on the same phone under different bias states and compare consistency.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper presents a monocular visual-inertial odometry system, XR-VIO, with two claimed contributions. The first is a fast visual-inertial initialization pipeline that tightly couples gyroscope measurements into structure-from-motion (VG-SfM, consisting of 2-point relative pose, VG-PnP, and VG-BA), followed by accelerometer-based alignment (VA-Align) and a final visual-inertial bundle adjustment (VI-BA) with a disparity-dependent weighting function. The second contribution is a hybrid feature-matching strategy that combines KLT optical flow and ORB descriptor matching with projection priors and optical-flow-guided descriptor search. Experiments on EuRoC and ZJU-Sensetime report lower initialization scale/ATE/gravity errors and lower trajectory ATE compared with several open-source baselines, and a mobile AR demo is described.

Significance. A reliable four-frame initialization procedure would be a practically valuable result for XR applications, where low-latency startup is important. The hybrid feature-matching scheme is a reasonable engineering contribution with consistent, if modest, trajectory-accuracy gains on both datasets. The paper's evaluation is broad: it uses public benchmarks, multiple baselines, and an ablation study, which strengthens the empirical case. However, the central success-rate claim rests on a weak definition of success, and the abstract overstates the state-of-the-art claim relative to the paper's own Table 2. If the claims are corrected and the success metric is made accuracy-aware, the underlying system appears sound and relevant to the VIO/AR community.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 5.3, Tab. 2] The definition of 'success' in Sec. 5.3 is explicitly not tied to any accuracy threshold: 'Success does not necessarily imply that the initialization results meet a certain threshold, nor does it imply that the initialization poses are qualified for VIO tracking.' Under this definition, a fragment with a grossly wrong scale or a diverged pose still counts as a success. Consequently, the reported 83.98% 4KF success rate does not substantiate the abstract's claim of 'stable performance even with only four image frames,' which is the paper's principal contribution. The authors should report success rates under a practically meaningful accuracy bound (e.g., scale error below 10% and ATE below 0.1 m) and also report the fraction of fragments whose initialization would actually be usable by the VIO tracker.
  2. [Abstract; Tab. 2] The abstract states that the method demonstrates 'state-of-the-art performance in terms of accuracy and success rate,' but Tab. 2 shows DRT-t achieving a higher 4KF success rate (86.56% vs. 83.98%). The 5KF success rate is higher for XR-VIO, so the global wording is not supported by the presented evidence. The CDF in Fig. 6 is an unthresholded visualization and does not quantify the trade-off; a numerical comparison at fixed success-rate levels or at fixed error thresholds is needed. This overclaim directly affects the paper's headline contribution and must be corrected.
  3. [Sec. 5.3, Eq. (15)-(17)] The accuracy metrics (scale error, ATE, gravity error) are averaged only over successful fragments, while success rates differ substantially across methods (e.g., 2.17% for Closed-form vs. 83.98% for XR-VIO in the 4KF setting). This means the methods are evaluated on different fragment subsets; a method that fails on difficult fragments and succeeds only on easy ones will appear more accurate. The CDF in Fig. 6 is only a qualitative mitigation. The authors should provide a matched comparison on the subset of fragments where all compared methods succeed, or otherwise quantify accuracy at a common success-rate operating point.
  4. [Sec. 3.2] The entire VG-SfM pipeline rests on the assumption that consumer-grade gyroscope rotation provides sufficiently accurate relative orientation over short intervals, even without calibrated bias. The paper does not provide a sensitivity analysis of the 4KF initialization accuracy and success rate with respect to gyroscope noise, bias instability, or vibration. Since this assumption is the key enabler for the 2-point reconstruction, VG-PnP, and VG-BA steps, the authors should include an experiment with artificially degraded gyroscope measurements (e.g., added noise or bias) to delineate the operating range of the method.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Sec. 3.2] There is a typo in the sentence introducing VG-BA: 'we proceed to perform VG-BA, , a bundle adjustment' contains a double comma.
  2. [Sec. 3.4] In the description of the VI-BA weighting issue, 'the the degrees of freedom of the 4KF IMU are excessively high' contains a doubled article; please correct.
  3. [Sec. 5] The text says 'we run and evaluate overall trajectory's accuracy ont both MA V and phone datasets'; 'ont' should be 'on', and 'MA V' should be 'MAV'.
  4. [Tab. 5] Table 5 includes SenseSLAM(V1.0) as a baseline, but Sec. 5.1 does not describe this method; please add a citation and a brief description of its configuration.
  5. [Supplementary material] The paper references supplementary material for ADVIO results and a video demo, but no supplementary file appears to accompany the arXiv version; please ensure the supplementary material is provided and referenced correctly.
  6. [Fig. 5] The caption of Fig. 5 states that fragments are color-coded by scale error, but the figure has no colorbar; the reader cannot map colors to numerical error values.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the VG-SfM derivation is self-contained and validated against external ground truth; the Sec. 5.3 success-rate caveat is a metric-validity limitation, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is not circular. VG-SfM (Sec. 3.2) introduces a new objective (Eqs. 10 and 11) that combines gyroscope pre-integration with visual reprojection, and the 2-point relative pose uses gyroscope rotation as a known prior rather than as a fitted target. VA-Align (Sec. 3.3) follows the external VINS-Mono formulation [35] and preintegration [15], not a self-citation. The VI-BA weights in Eq. 14 are hand-set constants (wmax=e4, wmin=1, Pmin=20 px), not parameters fitted to the reported ATE, scale, or gravity outcomes. The central evaluation is against external benchmarks (EuRoC [5] and ZJU-Sensetime [21]) with ground-truth trajectories, so no reported 'prediction' reduces by construction to a fitted input. The self-citations ([2], [11], [21]) appear in related work or as baseline-data provenance and are not load-bearing for the claimed derivation. The Sec. 5.3 caveat that 'success' merely means the module processed the fragment and produced poses is an explicit metric-validity limitation: it weakens the abstract's robustness and state-of-the-art claims, but it is not a circular step because the success rate is not defined in terms of the claimed conclusion and no derived quantity is equated to its own input. Overall, no circularity found.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

All free parameters are engineering constants. The VI-BA visual weight (wmax, wmin, Pmin) most directly affects reported scale error. The static/motion thresholds are not specified numerically. The matching thresholds are standard but arbitrary. Axioms are standard IMU pre-integration and a domain assumption about gyroscope accuracy over short intervals, plus the hand-designed weighting function. No invented entities are proposed.

free parameters (3)
  • VI-BA visual weight parameters (wmax, wmin, Pmin) = wmax = e^4, wmin = 1, Pmin = 20 pixels
    Eq. (14) in Sec. 3.4 introduces a sigmoid weighting w(P) to balance visual and IMU terms; the constants are stated without a fitting or cross-validation procedure. Ablation 'w/o weight' in Tab. 6 changes scale error from 26.88% to 28.27%, showing the parameters affect the result.
  • Static/motion detection thresholds = not stated
    Sec. 3.1 says static initialization is chosen when average feature displacement and IMU standard deviations are below specific thresholds, but no numeric values or tuning procedure are given.
  • Hybrid matching parameters = 150 tracks, 10-pixel search radius, ratio test 0.7
    Algorithm 1 sets a track threshold of 150, a search window of 10x10 pixels, and a ratio test threshold of 0.7; these engineering constants affect matching quality and are not justified by data.
assumptions (3)
  • standard math IMU pre-integration model of Forster et al. and VINS-Mono residual definitions are assumed correct.
    Equations (3)-(6) in Sec. 2.4 directly reuse the pre-integration and residual formulation from prior work without re-deriving it.
  • domain assumption Consumer-grade gyroscopes provide accurate rotation over short time intervals even without calibrated bias.
    Invoked in the introduction and in Sec. 3.2 (Two View Reconstruction), where gyroscope rotation is used as a fixed prior for 2-point pose estimation and VG-PnP/VG-BA.
  • ad hoc to paper The VI-BA weighting function w(P) with Pmin = 20 pixels is a valid balance between visual and IMU terms.
    Sec. 3.4, Eq. (14) introduces a hand-designed sigmoid weight with parameters chosen by the authors; the paper provides no derivation or independent validation for this functional form.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of XR-VIO: High-precision Visual Inertial Odometry with Fast Initialization for XR Applications." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JICV4SUC

@misc{pith2026250201297,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: XR-VIO: High-precision Visual Inertial Odometry with Fast Initialization for XR Applications},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JICV4SUC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.01297}
}
read the original abstract

This paper presents a novel approach to Visual Inertial Odometry (VIO), focusing on the initialization and feature matching modules. Existing methods for initialization often suffer from either poor stability in visual Structure from Motion (SfM) or fragility in solving a huge number of parameters simultaneously. To address these challenges, we propose a new pipeline for visual inertial initialization that robustly handles various complex scenarios. By tightly coupling gyroscope measurements, we enhance the robustness and accuracy of visual SfM. Our method demonstrates stable performance even with only four image frames, yielding competitive results. In terms of feature matching, we introduce a hybrid method that combines optical flow and descriptor-based matching. By leveraging the robustness of continuous optical flow tracking and the accuracy of descriptor matching, our approach achieves efficient, accurate, and robust tracking results. Through evaluation on multiple benchmarks, our method demonstrates state-of-the-art performance in terms of accuracy and success rate. Additionally, a video demonstration on mobile devices showcases the practical applicability of our approach in the field of Augmented Reality/Virtual Reality (AR/VR).

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.01297 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. This work primarily consists of two key modules: initialization and feature matching. The left side illustrates our initialization [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Pipeline of Visual Gyroscope tightly coupled SFM (VG-SFM) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Factor Graph of VG-BA frame c0. By defining the state as in Eq. (12), we can rewrite the Eq. (3) as: α Ik Ik+1 = R Ik c0 (s(p c0 Ik+1 −p c0 Ik )) + 1 2 g c0∆t 2 k −R c0 Ik vIk∆tk) β Ik Ik+1 = R Ik c0 (R c0 Ik+1 vIk+1 +g c0∆tk −R c0 Ik vIk ). (13) We combine Eq. (13) and Eq. (3) and solve for the initial state Xinit , following the methodology outlined in [35]. 3.4 VI-BA Once all the initial states are estimated, we … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Hybrid Feature Matching Approach Specifically, as outlined in Algorithm 1, for each frame of image, we first perform feature detection and description. Subsequently, during the feature matching process, tracks with established triangulation can be projected onto the cu…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Visualization of scale error on V2-01 (EuRoC). Fragments of poses are color-coded according to the magnitude of scale error for each [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Epipolar error statistics on all data from EuRoC. The x-axis [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: AR effects on mobile platforms of several hundred meters, no significant loop errors or height discrep￾ancies were visually observed. The experimental results highlight the system’s superior performance in both initialization and normal track￾ing tasks, emphasizing the…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Recent Advances and Future Directions in Extended Reality (XR): Exploring AI-Powered Spatial Intelligence

    cs.HC 2025-04 unverdicted

    A survey-style preprint describes XR hardware, software, and products and argues that multi-modal AI and IoT digital twins will drive future spatial intelligence.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    J. Bang, D. Lee, Y . Kim, and H. Lee. Camera pose estimation using optical flow and orb descriptor in slam-based mobile ar game. In 2017 International Conference on Platform Technology and Service (PlatCon) , pp. 1–4. IEEE, 2017. 2, 5

    work page 2017

  2. [2]

    H. Bao, W. Xie, Q. Qian, D. Chen, S. Zhai, N. Wang, and G. Zhang. Robust tightly-coupled visual-inertial odometry with pre-built maps in high latency situations. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 28(5):2212–2222, 2022. 2

    work page 2022

  3. [3]

    Bloesch, M

    M. Bloesch, M. Burri, S. Omari, M. Hutter, and R. Siegwart. Iterated ex- tended kalman filter based visual-inertial odometry using direct photomet- ric feedback. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 36(10):1053– 1072, 2017. 2

    work page 2017

  4. [4]

    G. Bradski. The OpenCV Library. Dr . Dobb’s Journal of Software Tools,

    work page

  5. [5]

    Burri, J

    M. Burri, J. Nikolic, P. Gohl, T. Schneider, J. Rehder, S. Omari, M. W. Achtelik, and R. Siegwart. The EuRoC micro aerial vehicle datasets. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 2016. 2, 6

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    Q. Cai, L. Zhang, Y . Wu, W. Yu, and D. Hu. A pose-only solution to visual reconstruction and navigation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 45(1):73–86, 2021. 6

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    Calonder, V

    M. Calonder, V . Lepetit, C. Strecha, and P. Fua. Brief: Binary robust independent elementary features. In Computer Vision–ECCV 2010: 11th European Conference on Computer Vision, Heraklion, Crete, Greece, September 5-11, 2010, Proceedings, Part IV 11 , pp. 778–792. Springer,

    work page 2010

  8. [8]

    Campos, R

    C. Campos, R. Elvira, J. J. G. Rodríguez, J. M. Montiel, and J. D. Tardós. ORB-SLAM3: An accurate open-source library for visual, visual–inertial, and multimap SLAM. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 37(6):1874–1890,

    work page

Show all 53 references
  1. [9]

    Campos, J

    C. Campos, J. M. Montiel, and J. D. Tardós. Fast and robust initialization for visual-inertial slam. In 2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 1288–1294. IEEE, 2019. 1

    2019

  2. [10]

    Campos, J

    C. Campos, J. M. Montiel, and J. D. Tardós. Inertial-only optimization for visual-inertial initialization. In 2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) , pp. 51–57. IEEE, 2020. 1, 3, 6, 7

    2020

  3. [11]

    D. Chen, N. Wang, R. Xu, W. Xie, H. Bao, and G. Zhang. RNIN-VIO: Robust neural inertial navigation aided visual-inertial odometry in chal- lenging scenes. In 2021 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR), pp. 275–283. IEEE, 2021. 2

    2021

  4. [12]

    Cortés, A

    S. Cortés, A. Solin, E. Rahtu, and J. Kannala. ADVIO: An authentic dataset for visual-inertial odometry. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), pp. 419–434, 2018. 8

    2018

  5. [13]

    Dong-Si and A

    T.-C. Dong-Si and A. I. Mourikis. Estimator initialization in vision- aided inertial navigation with unknown camera-imu calibration. In 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems , pp. 1064–1071, 2012. doi: 10.1109/IROS.2012.6386235 1, 2

    2012

  6. [14]

    Engel, V

    J. Engel, V . Koltun, and D. Cremers. Direct sparse odometry. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence , 40(3):611–625,

  7. [15]

    Forster, L

    C. Forster, L. Carlone, F. Dellaert, and D. Scaramuzza. On-manifold preintegration for real-time visual–inertial odometry. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 33(1):1–21, 2017. 1, 2, 3, 4

    2017

  8. [16]

    Geneva, K

    P. Geneva, K. Eckenhoff, W. Lee, Y . Yang, and G. Huang. OpenVINS: A research platform for visual-inertial estimation. In 2020 IEEE Interna- tional Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) , pp. 4666–4672. IEEE, 2020. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7

    2020

  9. [17]

    Geneva and G

    P. Geneva and G. Huang. Openvins state initialization: Details and derivations. Technical report, Tech. Rep. RPNG-2022-INIT, University of Delaware, 2022. 2, 7

    2022

  10. [18]

    M. Grupp. evo: Python package for the evaluation of odometry and slam. https://github.com/MichaelGrupp/evo, 2017. 6

    2017

  11. [19]

    Y . He, B. Xu, and H. Li. A rotation-translation-decoupled solution for robust and efficient visual-inertial initialization. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pp. 739–748, 2023. 1, 2, 3, 6, 7

    2023

  12. [20]

    Huai and G

    Z. Huai and G. Huang. Robocentric visual-inertial odometry. The Interna- tional Journal of Robotics Research, 41(7):667–689, 2022. 2

    2022

  13. [21]

    Jinyu, Y

    L. Jinyu, Y . Bangbang, C. Danpeng, W. Nan, Z. Guofeng, and B. Hujun. Survey and evaluation of monocular visual-inertial SLAM algorithms for augmented reality. Virtual Reality & Intelligent Hardware, 1(4):386–410,

  14. [22]

    Kneip, M

    L. Kneip, M. Chli, and R. Siegwart. Robust real-time visual odometry with a single camera and an imu. In Procedings of the British Machine Vision Conference 2011, Dec 2010. doi: 10.5244/c.25.16 4

    2011 doi

  15. [23]

    Kneip and S

    L. Kneip and S. Lynen. Direct optimization of frame-to-frame rotation. In 2013 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision , Nov 2013. doi: 10.1109/iccv.2013.292 6

    2013 doi

  16. [24]

    Leutenegger, M

    S. Leutenegger, M. Chli, and R. Y . Siegwart. Brisk: Binary robust invariant scalable keypoints. In 2011 International Conference on Computer Vision , pp. 2548–2555, 2011. doi: 10.1109/ICCV.2011.6126542 2

    2011

  17. [25]

    Leutenegger, S

    S. Leutenegger, S. Lynen, M. Bosse, R. Siegwart, and P. Furgale. Keyframe-based visual–inertial odometry using nonlinear optimization. The International Journal of Robotics Research , 34(3):314–334, 2015. 2, 5, 6, 7

    2015

  18. [26]

    Lucas and T

    B. Lucas and T. Kanade. An iterative image registration technique with an application to stereo vision. Aug 1981. 2, 4, 5

    1981

  19. [27]

    Martinelli

    A. Martinelli. Closed-form solution of visual-inertial structure from mo- tion. International journal of computer vision , 106(2):138–152, 2014. 1, 3, 6

    2014

  20. [28]

    P. S. Maybeck. Stochastic models, estimation, and control . Academic press, 1982. 4

    1982

  21. [29]

    Merrill, P

    N. Merrill, P. Geneva, and S. K. C. C. G. Huang. Fast monocular visual- inertial initialization leveraging learned single-view depth. In Robotics: Science and Systems (RSS) , vol. 2, 2023. 2

    2023

  22. [30]

    A. I. Mourikis and S. I. Roumeliotis. A multi-state constraint kalman filter for vision-aided inertial navigation. In Proceedings 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation , pp. 3565–3572, 4

    2007

  23. [31]

    Mur-Artal, J

    R. Mur-Artal, J. M. M. Montiel, and J. D. Tardós. ORB-SLAM: a versatile and accurate monocular SLAM system. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 31(5):1147–1163, 2015. 5, 6

    2015

  24. [32]

    Mur-Artal and J

    R. Mur-Artal and J. D. Tardós. Visual-inertial monocular SLAM with map reuse. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters , 2(2):796–803, 2017. 2, 8

    2017

  25. [33]

    D. Nister. An efficient solution to the five-point relative pose prob- lem. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence , 26(6):756–770, June 2004. 4

    2004

  26. [34]

    T. Qin, S. Cao, J. Pan, and S. Shen. A general optimization-based frame- work for global pose estimation with multiple sensors, 2019. 2

    2019

  27. [35]

    T. Qin, P. Li, and S. Shen. VINS-Mono: A robust and versatile monocular visual-inertial state estimator. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 34(4):1004– 1020, 2018. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7

    2018

  28. [36]

    T. Qin, J. Pan, S. Cao, and S. Shen. A general optimization-based frame- work for local odometry estimation with multiple sensors, 2019. 2, 6, 7

    2019

  29. [37]

    Qin and S

    T. Qin and S. Shen. Robust initialization of monocular visual-inertial estimation on aerial robots. In 2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) , Sep 2017. doi: 10.1109/iros. 2017.8206284 1

    2017

  30. [38]

    Ranftl, K

    R. Ranftl, K. Lasinger, D. Hafner, K. Schindler, and V . Koltun. Towards robust monocular depth estimation: Mixing datasets for zero-shot cross- dataset transfer. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 44(3):1623–1637, 2020. 2

    2020

  31. [39]

    Rublee, V

    E. Rublee, V . Rabaud, K. Konolige, and G. Bradski. Orb: An efficient alternative to sift or surf. In 2011 International conference on computer vision, pp. 2564–2571. Ieee, 2011. 2

    2011

  32. [40]

    Sarlin, D

    P.-E. Sarlin, D. DeTone, T. Malisiewicz, and A. Rabinovich. Superglue: Learning feature matching with graph neural networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pp. 4938–4947, 2020. 2

    2020

  33. [41]

    R. B. Schinazi. The Cumulative Distribution Function , pp. 159–168. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2022. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030 -93635-8_15 7

    2022 doi

  34. [42]

    Seiskari, P

    O. Seiskari, P. Rantalankila, J. Kannala, J. Ylilammi, E. Rahtu, and A. Solin. Hybvio: Pushing the limits of real-time visual-inertial odometry. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision, pp. 701–710, 2022. 6, 7, 8, 9

    2022

  35. [43]

    Shi and Tomasi

    J. Shi and Tomasi. Good features to track. In 1994 Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pp. 593–600, June 1994. 2

    1994

  36. [44]

    J. Sun, Z. Shen, Y . Wang, H. Bao, and X. Zhou. Loftr: Detector-free local feature matching with transformers. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pp. 8922–8931,

  37. [45]

    Triggs, P

    B. Triggs, P. F. McLauchlan, R. I. Hartley, and A. W. Fitzgibbon. Bundle adjustment—a modern synthesis. In International workshop on vision algorithms, pp. 298–372. Springer, 1999. 2

    1999

  38. [46]

    von Stumberg and D

    L. von Stumberg and D. Cremers. DM-VIO: Delayed marginalization visual-inertial odometry. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters (RA-L) , 7(2):1408–1415, 2022. 2, 8

    2022

  39. [47]

    V on Stumberg, V

    L. V on Stumberg, V . Usenko, and D. Cremers. Direct sparse visual-inertial odometry using dynamic marginalization. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) , pp. 2510–2517. IEEE,

    2018

  40. [48]

    K. Wu, A. M. Ahmed, G. A. Georgiou, and S. I. Roumeliotis. A square root inverse filter for efficient vision-aided inertial navigation on mobile devices. In Robotics: Science and Systems , vol. 2, p. 2. Rome, Italy, 2015. 3, 4

    2015

  41. [49]

    Zhang and D

    Z. Zhang and D. Scaramuzza. A tutorial on quantitative trajectory evalua- tion for visual(-inertial) odometry. In IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. Intell. Robot. Syst. (IROS), 2018. 6

    2018

  42. [50]

    Zhong, L

    L. Zhong, L. Meng, W. Hou, and L. Huang. An improved visual odome- ter based on lucas-kanade optical flow and orb feature. IEEE Access , 11:47179–47186, 2023. 2, 5

    2023

  43. [51]

    Y . Zhou, A. Kar, E. Turner, A. Kowdle, C. Guo, R. DuToit, and K. Tsotsos. Learned monocular depth priors in visual-inertial initialization. Apr 2022. 2, 6, 7

    2022

  44. [52]

    L. Zong, H. Wang, B. Wang, Q. Fu, and X. Sun. An improved method of real-time camera pose estimation based on descriptor tracking. In 2017 IEEE 20th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), pp. 903–908. IEEE, 2017. 2, 5

    2017

  45. [53]

    Zuñiga-Noël, F.-A

    D. Zuñiga-Noël, F.-A. Moreno, and J. Gonzalez-Jimenez. An analytical solution to the imu initialization problem for visual-inertial systems. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 6(3):6116–6122, 2021. 1

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.