Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Multiparticle Quantum Heat Engine: Exploring the Impact of Criticality on Efficiency

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that for a long-range Ising spin chain serving as the working substance of a quantum Otto cycle, the operational mode and efficiency are set by the interaction exponent, particle number, and thermal gap, and that near…

desk verdict A useful parameter scan, but the spectrum used is for a periodic chain while the model is open-boundary—so the quantitative results are not about the stated working substance. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.01469 v2 pith:EXGIWTHX submitted 2025-02-03 quant-ph

Anass Hminat , Abdallah Slaoui , Brahim Amghar , Rachid Ahl Laamara This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-ph
keywords quantumOttoenginelong-rangeIsingchaincriticalityrefrigeratorscalingfactorpower-lawinteractionsthermodynamicsefficiency
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

An idealized quantum Otto cycle is analyzed with a long-range Ising spin chain as the working substance, using two adiabatic strokes and two perfect thermalizations. The paper argues that the cycle's role—heat engine, refrigerator, accelerator, or heater—is controlled by the interaction exponent α, the number of spins N, and the cold-to-hot temperature ratio. The central quantitative claim is that close to the quantum critical point the scaling factor per spin, a measure of useful output relative to the gap from Carnot efficiency, grows superlinearly with N for short-range interactions. If this holds, system size itself becomes a tunable resource for quantum thermal machines, with an advantage that does not appear in their classical counterparts.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the long-range transverse-field Ising Hamiltonian of Eq. (1), which the paper maps to a translationally invariant fermionic hopping-pairing model (Eq. (3), Appendix A) and diagonalizes with Fourier modes and a Bogoliubov transformation. This yields the quasiparticle spectrum $\omega_k(h) = 2\sqrt{(h-t_k)^2 + \Delta_k^2}$, where $t_k$ and $\Delta_k$ are polylogarithmic Fourier transforms of the power-law couplings. The Otto cycle is evaluated in the infinitely slow adiabatic limit, so each momentum mode is populated according to the Fermi–Dirac distribution at the appropriate bath temperature, and heat, work, efficiency, and coefficient of performance are sums over these modes. The scaling factor per spin $\Pi/N$ (Eq. (22)), which divides the work by the shortfall from Carnot efficiency before normalizing by $N$, and its refrigerator counterpart $\Pi_R/N$ are the diagnostics that expose the critical enhancement.

What would settle it

Perform exact diagonalization (or a tensor-network simulation) of the original spin Hamiltonian in Eq. (1) for up to $N=100$ sites without invoking the Fourier mapping, compute the Otto-cycle efficiency and $\Pi/N$ for the same parameters as Figures 12–13, and check whether the critical peak still grows as $N^{\alpha}$ for large $\alpha$; a systematic disagreement would falsify the central claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that the thermodynamics of the long-range Ising Otto machine is governed by a single-particle spectrum obtained after mapping the spin chain to translationally invariant fermions and diagonalizing it with a Bogoliubov transformation. Near the critical field, the scaling factor per spin $\Pi/N$ (and its refrigerator analogue $\Pi_R/N$) develops sharp peaks. For short-range interactions the maximum of these critical peaks follows a clearly superlinear power law in system size, $\Pi_{(R)}^{\mathrm{crit}}/N \sim N^{\alpha}$ with $\alpha > 0$, while long-range couplings suppress the critical peak and give linear or saturating growth. The paper also reports that long-range correlations enhance engine performance in the pre-critical field region and refrigerator performance after it, and that the engine efficiency and refrigerator coefficient of performance respond oppositely to changes in $\alpha$.

Load-bearing premise

The results assume that the open-boundary long-range Ising chain with Kac normalization is exactly equivalent to a translation-invariant periodic fermionic hopping-pairing model, so that Fourier diagonalization and the spectrum in Eq. (13) apply; if this mapping is not exact, the reported efficiencies, operational maps, and scaling exponents describe a different model.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • As $N$ grows, the device moves from coherent, engine-dominated behavior at small sizes to refrigerator- and transient-dominated behavior near criticality.
  • Long-range couplings (small $\alpha$) improve work and heat extraction before the transition, while short-range couplings (large $\alpha$) dominate after it.
  • The maximum critical value of $\Pi/N$ obeys a superlinear power law in $N$ for short-range interactions, meaning larger chains give more performance per spin.
  • The heat-engine efficiency and refrigerator COP respond in opposite ways to $\alpha$, so the same interaction range that boosts one mode suppresses the other.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A consequence the authors leave implicit: because the fermionic model is non-interacting, the many-body critical enhancement is carried by the band structure, so a single-particle or band-theory account may reproduce the superlinear scaling.
  • A testable extension would be to measure $\Pi/N$ on a trapped-ion platform with tunable $\alpha$ and $N$ up to the paper's range; observing the $N^{\alpha}$ critical peak would confirm that the effect survives beyond the ideal zero-dissipation assumption.
  • The operational-mode maps suggest a control strategy: switching the machine between engine and refrigerator by tuning $\alpha$ or $T_c/T_h$ could serve as a heat-management switch in nanoscale devices, something the paper notes only qualitatively.
  • If the mapping to a periodic model fails, the distinction between long- and short-range performance might change, so the paper's central contrast would need re-evaluation; the authors do not explicitly test that equivalence.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper analyzes an idealized quantum Otto cycle whose working substance is a long-range transverse-field Ising chain with open boundary conditions and Kac normalization. It assumes perfectly adiabatic strokes and perfect thermalization, expresses heat, work, and efficiency through a free-fermion spectrum ω_k(h), and classifies the device into engine, refrigerator, accelerator, and heater regimes as a function of the interaction exponent α, system size N, and reservoir temperatures. The central quantitative claim is that near the quantum critical point the normalized scaling factors Π/N and Π_R/N grow superlinearly with N, with fitted power-law exponents reported in Fig. 13 and Section IV.A.

Significance. If the model and spectral input were valid, the paper would offer a concrete, analytically tractable demonstration that many-body criticality can act as a size-dependent performance lever in quantum thermal machines. The explicit formulas for Q_h, Q_c, W, η, and η_R, together with the operational-mode classification, are useful and would be of interest to the quantum thermodynamics community. The work also correctly identifies that the interaction exponent, particle number, and thermal gap jointly control the operating mode. However, the significance is conditional on an equivalence between the open-boundary spin Hamiltonian of Eq. (1) and the translationally invariant periodic fermionic model of Eq. (3)/Appendix A; this equivalence is neither derived nor referenced, and the paper's own Appendix B contradicts the main text's use of the simple Fourier spectrum.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section II.A, Eqs. (1)-(13), and Appendices A-B] The spectrum used for all thermodynamic quantities is obtained from a translationally invariant fermionic chain with periodic boundary conditions, Eq. (A1), and the Fourier decomposition of Eq. (5). The working substance, however, is the open-boundary long-range Ising Hamiltonian of Eq. (1) with Kac normalization Eq. (2). A Jordan-Wigner transformation of Eq. (1) with power-law spin couplings and open boundaries does not produce the uniform, periodic hopping and pairing model of Eq. (3); the long-range spin interactions generate nonlocal string operators and position-dependent fermionic couplings. Appendix B explicitly states that in the disordered case one cannot reduce the problem to simple 2×2 blocks and that the full Nambu-Bogoliubov-de Gennes formalism is needed. Since Eqs. (18)-(23) and all figures rely on the spectrum ω_k(h) of Eq. (13), the central results, including the superlinear scaling claim of Section IV.A, are computed for a different model unless a rigorous mapping from Eq. (1) to Eq. (A1) is supplied. This is a load-bearing gap.
  2. [Section II.B, Eqs. (15)-(16) and Eq. (19), and Fig. 2] The thermodynamic conventions are internally inconsistent. The text in steps (b) and (d) assigns the cold and hot baths in a way that conflicts with the caption of Fig. 2, which places thermalization with T_h at B→C and with T_c at D→A. More importantly, Eqs. (15)-(16) define Q_c using ⟨H(t_f)⟩ and Q_h using ⟨H(t_i)⟩, whereas Eq. (19) evaluates Q_h at ω(h_f) and Q_c at ω(h_i). These two definitions cannot both hold for the same cycle. The stated convention that Q_{c(h)}>0 when the system absorbs heat from the reservoir is also inconsistent with the signs that follow from Eq. (19) in the engine mode. The efficiency η=W/Q_h and the mode classification depend on these signs, so the convention must be fixed before the quantitative results can be interpreted.
  3. [Section IV.A and Fig. 13] The central scaling statement is not stated precisely. The text first defines a regression exponent a for the growth of Π/N and Π_R/N, then concludes with the formula Π^{(R)}_{crit}/N ∼ N^α with α>0, using the same symbol as the interaction-range exponent. The fitted values shown in Fig. 13, such as a=-0.1035 and a≈0.2355, are not reconciled with this formula, and the phrase 'superlinear power-law scaling' is ambiguous because a positive exponent for Π/N is sublinear in the normalized quantity unless one is referring to the unnormalized Π. This ambiguity directly affects the paper's main claim and should be resolved with explicit definitions of both the fitted exponent and the quantities being scaled.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Appendix A and general text] There are several typographical errors, including 'anad' for 'and' in Appendix A, 'descibes' for 'describes', and 'paraagnetic' for 'paramagnetic' in the conclusion.
  2. [Eqs. (2)-(4)] The Kac normalization in Eq. (2) for the open spin chain is K(α)=[1/(N-1)]Σ_{i<j}|i-j|^{-α}, while the fermionic model in Eq. (4) and Appendix A uses N_α=Σ_{r=1}^{N/2} r^{-α}. These are different finite-N normalizations, and the paper does not explain how one is obtained from the other under periodic boundary conditions.
  3. [Section II.A] The text states 'we set J=Δ=1', but Eq. (1) contains only J and h; the pairing amplitude Δ is introduced only in the fermionic model in Eq. (3). The relation between the spin coupling J and the fermionic Δ should be stated explicitly.
  4. [Introduction and Section II.A] The citation supporting Eq. (3) is given as Ref. [9], which is a single-qubit Otto engine paper; the long-range fermionic model and its diagonalization are more naturally associated with Refs. [15,30,31], so the citation should be corrected.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the efficiency formulas follow from an assumed spectrum, the scaling exponents are fits, and the self-citations are not load-bearing.

full rationale

The thermodynamic part of the paper is not circular. Given the free-fermion spectrum ω_k(h)=2√((h−t_k)^2+Δ_k^2) (Eq. 13/A11), the heats, work, and efficiencies are computed by summing Fermi-Dirac occupations; W=Q_h+Q_c follows from the first law and the definitions in Eq. (19), and nothing in that chain is fitted to the quantities it is used to explain. The superlinear peak scaling is presented as a regression characterization of computed data ('using a regression to calculate the exponent...'), i.e., a fit, not an independent prediction, so it does not reduce to its inputs by construction. The CMFT critical field is an external cluster mean-field input used only to locate phase boundaries. The authors' self-citations (Refs. [24], [25], [28], [55], [72]) are contextual or appear alongside independent references and do not carry the central derivation. The paper's real weakness is the unproved replacement of the open-boundary spin model in Eq. (1) by the translationally invariant fermionic model in Eq. (A1): Fourier diagonalization is valid only for the latter, and Appendix B itself states that in the disordered case one 'cannot reduce ourselves to 2×2 problems in a simple way.' That is a correctness/validity problem, not circularity, because the derived efficiencies are genuine consequences of the assumed spectrum rather than restatements of the input Hamiltonian.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on one critical ad hoc mapping from an open spin chain to a periodic free-fermion model, plus the ideal Otto cycle idealization and an externally fitted critical field. The fitted scaling exponents are free parameters extracted from the numerical data without uncertainty.

free parameters (3)
  • Critical field interpolation hc(α) = hc = 1 for α ≤ 1; hc = 0.35(3.2 - α) for 1 < α < 2
    Obtained by interpolating CMFT cluster mean-field data; used to locate the 'critical point' for all peak and scaling analysis in Section IV.A.
  • Scaling exponent a for Π/N (engine) = a = -0.1035 (long-range, α=0.2); a ≈ 0.2355 (short-range, α=1.2)
    Fitted by regression to the maxima of Π/N vs N in Fig. 13; no error bars or R² reported.
  • Scaling slope for ΠR/N (refrigerator) = slope rising from 0.47 to 0.94 as N increases
    Fitted linear dependence of ΠR/N in the ferromagnetic phase for α=1.2 (Fig. 13-d); no error analysis.
assumptions (4)
  • ad hoc to paper The open-boundary long-range Ising Hamiltonian Eq. (1) is equivalent to the translationally-invariant periodic fermionic Hamiltonian Eq. (A1) with power-law hopping and pairing.
    No derivation or reference supports this mapping; the Jordan-Wigner transform of an open chain with Kac-normalized long-range couplings does not yield a periodic translationally-invariant model. Invoked in Section II.A before Eq. (3).
  • domain assumption The ideal Otto cycle with infinitely slow adiabats and perfect thermalization accurately represents the device; thermalization to Fermi-Dirac distributions at βc and βh is assumed.
    Standard idealization in quantum thermodynamics, but it removes all dissipative effects, so efficiency claims are upper bounds. Invoked in Section II.B.
  • domain assumption The critical field location hc(α) from CMFT interpolation correctly captures the quantum phase transition of the model used.
    The CMFT results are for the long-range Ising model, not necessarily for the periodic fermionic model actually solved; also the interpolation formula is not derived. Used in Section II.A and IV.A.
  • domain assumption The global Lindblad master equation (Eq. 17) with fermionic jump operators is a valid description, and its infinite-time limit gives the Fermi-Dirac occupation used in Eq. (19).
    This assumes no degeneracies and a specific bath coupling; but the paper only uses the fixed point, so the dynamics is not needed. Reference [56] is cited.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Multiparticle Quantum Heat Engine: Exploring the Impact of Criticality on Efficiency." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EXGIWTHX

@misc{pith2026250201469,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Multiparticle Quantum Heat Engine: Exploring the Impact of Criticality on Efficiency},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EXGIWTHX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.01469}
}
read the original abstract

Quantum many-body systems present substantial technical challenges from both analytical and numerical perspectives. Despite these difficulties, some progress has been made, including studies of interacting atomic gases and interacting quantum spins. Furthermore, the potential for criticality to enhance engine performance has been demonstrated, suggesting a promising direction for future investigation. Here, we explore the performance of a quantum Otto cycle using a long-range Ising chain as the working substance. We consider an idealized cycle consisting of two adiabatic transformations and two perfect thermalizations, eliminating dissipation. Analyzing both engine and refrigerator modes, we investigate the influence of particle number, varied from 10 to 100, on efficiencies and behavior near the critical point of the phase transition, which we characterize using a scaling factor. We also examine how internal factors; specifically, the power-law exponent, the number of particles, and the hot and cold reservoir temperatures, affect the system's operation in different modes. Our results reveal that these factors have a different impact compared to their classical counterparts.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.01469 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: Dynamical phase diagram for the long-range Ising [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: The schematic of the Ising Long-range quantum Otto [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: The color code represents the following modes: green [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (10 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Operating regimes of the quantum Otto engine: (a) in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: The influence of long-range interactions on the work and the quantum refrigerator’s performance per spin as a function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: In the figure, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Efficient [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: Contour plot of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: COP of the refrigerator versus [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: a-b elucidates the behavior of the work per spin, W/N, as a function of varying α, Th, and Tc, highlighting the influence of chain length N, transverse field hi , and differ- [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11: Contour plot of the work per spin [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12: The scaling factor per spin [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13: The evolution of the maxima as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_13.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Characterizing non-Markovianity via quantum coherence based on Kirkwood-Dirac quasiprobability

    quant-ph 2025-06 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    A non-Markovianity measure built from the growth of Kirkwood-Dirac quasiprobability coherence is proposed and applied to dephasing and dissipation in one- and two-qubit systems.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

75 extracted references · 70 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [15]

    Piccitto, M

    G. Piccitto, M. Campisi, and D. Rossini, The Ising critical quan- tum Otto engine, New Journal of Physics, 24 (2022) 103023

    work page 2022

  2. [65]

    Campisi and R

    M. Campisi and R. Fazio, The power of a critical heat engine, Nat. Commun. 7 (2016) 11895

    work page 2016

  3. [1]

    D. E. Winterbone and A. Turan, Advanced Thermodynamics for Engineers, Butterworth-Heinemann, 2015

    work page 2015

  4. [2]

    Deffner and S

    S. Deffner and S. Campbell, Thermodynamics of Quantum Sys- tems, Quantum Thermodynamics, Morgan Claypool Publishers (2019)

    work page 2019

  5. [3]

    Strasberg (2021) Quantum stochastic thermodynamics: foun- dations and selected applications, Oxford University Press, 2022

    P. Strasberg (2021) Quantum stochastic thermodynamics: foun- dations and selected applications, Oxford University Press, 2022

    work page 2021

  6. [4]

    J. P. P ´erez, Thermodynamique: fondements et applications: avec 250 exercices et probl`emes r´esolus, Dunod, 2001

    work page 2001

  7. [5]

    H. E. Scovil and E. O. Schulz-DuBois, Three-level masers as heat engines, Phys. Rev. Lett, 2 (1959) 262

    work page 1959

  8. [6]

    Latifah and A

    E. Latifah and A. Purwanto, Quantum Heat Engines; Multiple- State 1D Box System, Journal of Modern Physics, 4 (2013) 1091–1098

    work page 2013

Show all 75 references
  1. [7]

    C. M. Bender, D. C. Brody, and B. K. Meister, Entropy and temperature of a quantum Carnot engine, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 458 (2002) 1519-1526

    2002

  2. [8]

    C. M. Bender, D. C. Brody, and B. K. Meister, Quantum me- chanical Carnot engine, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.33 (2000) 4427

    2000

  3. [9]

    Solfanelli, M

    A. Solfanelli, M. Falsetti, and M. Campisi, Nonadiabatic single- qubit quantum Otto engine, Phys. Rev. B. 101, 054513 (2020)

    2020

  4. [10]

    Fisher, Shang-keng Ma, and B

    Michael E. Fisher, Shang-keng Ma, and B. G. Nickel, Criti- cal Exponents for Long-Range Interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett, 29 (1972) 917

    1972

  5. [11]

    Long-range Ising and Kitaev Models: Phases, Correlations and Edge Modes

    V odola, Davide and Lepori, Luca and Ercolessi, Elisa and Pupillo, Guido . Long-range Ising and Kitaev Models: Phases, Correlations and Edge Modes . 2016 New J. Phys. 18 015001,doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/18/1/015001

    2016 doi

  6. [12]

    Eduardo Gonzalez Lazo, Markus Heyl, Marcello Dalmonte, Adriano Angelone, Finite-temperature critical behavior of long- range quantum Ising models, SciPost Phys, 11, 076 (2021)

    2021

  7. [13]

    Lewenstein1, and Luca, Taglia- cozzo1.Entanglement Entropy for the Long-Range Ising Chain in a Transverse Field, Phys

    Thomas Koffel1, M. Lewenstein1, and Luca, Taglia- cozzo1.Entanglement Entropy for the Long-Range Ising Chain in a Transverse Field, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 (2012) 267203

    2012

  8. [14]

    Nicol `o Defenu, Tobias Donner, Tommaso Macr `ı, Guido Pagano, Stefano Ruffo, and Andrea Trombettoni, Long-range interacting quantum systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 95 (2023) 035002

    2023

  9. [16]

    Y . Yin, L. Chen, and F. Wu, Optimal power and efficiency of quantum Stirling heat engines, Eur. Phys. J. Plus, 132 (2017) 45

    2017

  10. [17]

    Y . Yin, L. Chen, and F. Wu, Performance of quantum Stirling heat engine with numerous copies of extreme relativistic parti- cles confined in 1D potential well, Physica A, 503 (2018) 58

    2018

  11. [18]

    Deny Pra Setyo, Eny Latifah, Hari Wisodo, and Arif Hi- dayat, Quantum Relativistic Diesel Engine with Single Mass- less Fermion in 1 Dimensional Box System, Jurnal Penelitian Fisika dan Aplikasinya (JPFA), 8, 1 (2018)

    2018

  12. [19]

    Series: Journal of Physics: Conf

    Deny Pra Setyo and Eny Latifah, Quantum Otto Engine based on Multiple-State Single Fermion in 1D Box System, IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series, 1093 (2018) 012030

    2018

  13. [20]

    Agus Purwanto, Heru Sukamto, Bintoro Anang Subagyo, and Muhammad Taufiqi, Two Scenarios on the Relativistic Quan- tum Heat Engine, Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics, 4 (2016) 1344–1353

    2016

  14. [21]

    P. A. Camati, J. F. Santos, and R. M. Serra, Coherence effects in the performance of the quantum Otto heat engine, Phys. Rev. A, 99 (2019) 062103

    2019

  15. [22]

    Bouton, J

    Q. Bouton, J. Nettersheim, S. Burgardt, D. Adam, E. Lutz, and A. Widera, A quantum heat engine driven by atomic collisions, Nat. Commun, 12 (2021) 2063

    2021

  16. [23]

    V . R. Arezzo, D. Rossini, and G. Piccitto, Many-body quantum heat engines based on free fermion systems, Phys. Rev. B, 109 (2024) 224309

    2024

  17. [24]

    El Makouri, A

    A. El Makouri, A. Slaoui, and R. A. Laamara, Quantum unital Otto heat engines: Using Kirkwood–Dirac quasi-probability for the engine’s coherence to stay alive, Annals of Physics, 473 (2025) 169889

    2025

  18. [25]

    El Makouri, A

    A. El Makouri, A. Slaoui, and R. Ahl Laamara, Monitored nonadiabatic and coherent-controlled quantum unital Otto heat engines: First four cumulants, Phys. Rev. E, 108 (2023) 044114

    2023

  19. [26]

    Ranabhat, and M

    N. Ranabhat, and M. Collura, Thermalization of long range Ising model in different dynamical regimes: A full counting statistics approach, SciPost Physics Core, 7 (2024) 017

    2024

  20. [27]

    Ranabhat, and M

    N. Ranabhat, and M. Collura, Thermalization of long range Ising model in different dynamical regimes: A full counting statistics approach, SciPost Phys. Core, 7 (2024) 017

    2024

  21. [28]

    Amghar, A

    B. Amghar, A. Slaoui, J. Elfakir, and M. Daoud, Geometrical, topological, and dynamical description of N interacting spin-s particles in a long-range Ising model and their interplay with quantum entanglement, Phys. Rev. A, 107 (2023) 032402

    2023

  22. [29]

    Lerose, B

    A. Lerose, B. ˇZunkoviˇc, A. Silva, and A. Gambassi, Quasilocal- ized excitations induced by long-range interactions in transla- tionally invariant quantum spin chains, Phys. Rev. B,99 (2019) 121112

    2019

  23. [30]

    Piccitto, B

    G. Piccitto, B. ˇZunkovi´c, and A. Silva, Dynamical phase di- agram of a quantum Ising chain with long-range interactions, Phys. Rev. B, 100 (2019) 180402

    2019

  24. [31]

    Piccitto and A

    G. Piccitto and A. Silva, Crossover from fast to slow dynam- ics in a long-range interacting Ising chain, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Practice, 2019 (2019) 094017

    2019

  25. [32]

    F. Liu, R. Lundgren, P. Titum, G.Pagano, J.Zhang, C.Monroe, and A.V . Gorshkov, Confined quasiparticle dynamics in long- range interacting quantum spin chains, Phys. Rev. Lett, 122 (2019) 150601

    2019

  26. [33]

    Scopa, P

    S. Scopa, P. Calabrese and A. Bastianello, Entanglement dy- namics in confining spin chains, Phys. Rev. B, 105 (2022) 125413

    2022

  27. [34]

    Mukherjee and U

    V . Mukherjee and U. Divakaran, Many-body quantum thermal machines, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter, 33 (2021) 454001

    2021

  28. [35]

    L. M. Cangemi, C. Bhadra, and A. Levy, Quantum engines and refrigerators, Physics Reports, 1087 (2024) 1-71

    2024

  29. [36]

    Jaramillo, M

    J. Jaramillo, M. Beau, and A. del Campo, Quantum supremacy 18 of many-particle thermal machines, New J. Phys, 18 (2016) 075019

    2016

  30. [37]

    R. S. Watson, and K. V . Kheruntsyan, An interaction-driven quantum many-body engine enabled by atom-atom correla- tions, arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.05266, (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  31. [38]

    N. Y . Halpern, C. D. White, S. Gopalakrishnan, and G. Refael, Quantum engine based on many-body localization, Phys. Rev. B, 99 (2019) 024203

    2019

  32. [39]

    Carollo, F

    F. Carollo, F. M. Gambetta, K. Brandner, J. P. Garrahan, and I. Lesanovsky, Nonequilibrium quantum many-body rydberg atom engine, Phys. Rev. Lett, 124 (2020) 170602

    2020

  33. [40]

    Zhang, W.-T

    T. Zhang, W.-T. Liu, P.-X. Chen, and C.-Z. Li, Four-level entan- gled quantum heat engines, Phys. Rev. A, 75 (2007) 062102

    2007

  34. [41]

    Mu ˜noz and F

    E. Mu ˜noz and F. J. Pe ˜na, Magnetically driven quantum heat engine, Phys. Rev. E, 89 (2014) 052107

    2014

  35. [42]

    Xu, Long-range coupling affects entanglement dynamics, Physics 15 (2022) 2

    S. Xu, Long-range coupling affects entanglement dynamics, Physics 15 (2022) 2

    2022

  36. [43]

    Russomanno, F

    A. Russomanno, F. Iemini, M. Dalmonte, and R. Fazio, Floquet time crystal in the Lipkin–Meshkov–Glick model, Phys. Rev. B 95 (2017) 214307

    2017

  37. [44]

    F. M. Surace, A. Russomanno, M. Dalmonte, A. Silva, R. Fazio, and F. Iemini, Floquet time crystals in clock models, Phys. Rev. B 99 (2019) 104303

    2019

  38. [45]

    Pizzi, J

    A. Pizzi, J. Knolle, and A. Nunnenkamp, Higher-order and frac- tional discrete time crystals in clean long-range interacting sys- tems, Nat. Commun. 12 (2021) 2341

    2021

  39. [46]

    Defenu, G

    N. Defenu, G. Morigi, L. Dell’Anna, and T. Enss, Universal dynamical scaling of long-range topological superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 100 (2019) 184306

    2019

  40. [47]

    J. C. Halimeh, M. Van Damme, V . Zauner-Stauber, and L. Van- derstraeten, Quasiparticle origin of dynamical quantum phase transitions, Phys. Rev. Res. 2 (2020) 033111

    2020

  41. [48]

    O. L. Acevedo, L. Quiroga, F. J. Rodr ´ıguez, and N. F. John- son, New dynamical scaling universality for quantum networks across adiabatic quantum phase transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett.112 (2014) 030403

    2014

  42. [49]

    Hwang, R

    M.-J. Hwang, R. Puebla, and M. B. Plenio, Quantum phase transition and universal dynamics in the Rabi model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 180404

    2015

  43. [50]

    Defenu, T

    N. Defenu, T. Enss, M. Kastner, and G. Morigi, Dynamical crit- ical scaling of long-range interacting quantum magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (2018) 240403

    2018

  44. [51]

    Richerme, Z.-X

    P. Richerme, Z.-X. Gong, A. Lee, C. Senko, J. Smith, M. Foss- Feig, S. Michalakis, A. V . Gorshkov, and C. Monroe, Non-local propagation of correlations in quantum systems with long-range interactions, Nature, 511, 198 (2014)

    2014

  45. [52]

    Jurcevic, B

    P. Jurcevic, B. P. Lanyon, P. Hauke, C. Hempel, P. Zoller, R. Blatt, and C. F. Roos, Quasiparticle engineering and entan- glement propagation in a quantum many-body system, Nature, 511, 202 (2014)

    2014

  46. [53]

    Koffel, M

    T. Koffel, M. Lewenstein, and L. Tagliacozzo, Entanglement entropy for the long-range Ising chain in a transverse field, Phys. Rev. Lett., 109, 267203 (2012)

    2012

  47. [54]

    A. S. Buyskikh, M. Fagotti, J. Schachenmayer, F. Essler, and A. J. Daley, Entanglement growth and correlation spreading with variable-range interactions in spin and fermionic tunnel- ing models, Phys. Rev. A, 93, 053620 (2016)

    2016

  48. [55]

    Tarif, A

    H. Tarif, A. Slaoui, and R. Ahl Laamara, Unlocking thermo- dynamic multitasking: Exploring the functioning of two-qubit engines through coherence and entanglement, Physica A, 668 (2025) 130469

    2025

  49. [56]

    D’Abbruzzo and D

    A. D’Abbruzzo and D. Rossini, Self-consistent microscopic derivation of Markovian master equations for open quadratic quantum systems, Phys. Rev. A, 103 (2021) 052209

    2021

  50. [57]

    Fusco, M

    L. Fusco, M. Paternostro, and G. De Chiara, Work extraction and energy storage in the Dicke model, Phys. Rev. E,94 (2016) 052122

    2016

  51. [58]

    J. G. Mart ´ınez-Herreraa, Critical temperature of one- dimensional Ising model with long-range interaction revisited, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 596 (2022) 127136

    2022

  52. [59]

    Dorner, J

    R. Dorner, J. Goold, C. Cormick, M. Paternostro, and V . Vedral, Emergent thermodynamics in a quenched quantum many-body system, Phys. Rev. Lett, 109 (2012) 160601

    2012

  53. [60]

    Fusco, S

    L. Fusco, S. Pigeon, T.J.G. Apollaro, A. Xuereb, L. Mazzola, M. Campisi, A. Ferraro, M. Paternostro, and G. De Chiara, Assessing the nonequilibrium thermodynamics in a quenched quantum many-body system via single projective measure- ments, Phys. Rev. X, 4 (2014) 031029

    2014

  54. [61]

    M. O. Scully, M. S. Zubairy, G. S. Agarwal, and H. Walther, Extracting work from a single heat bath via quantum coherence, Science 299 (2003) 862–864

    2003

  55. [62]

    Uzdin, A

    R. Uzdin, A. Levy, and R. Kosloff, Equivalence of quantum heat machines, and quantum-thermodynamic signatures, Phys. Rev. X 5 (2015) 031044

    2015

  56. [63]

    H. T. Quan, Y . X. Liu, C. P. Sun, and F. Nori, Quantum ther- modynamic cycles and quantum heat engines, Phys. Rev. E 76 (2007) 031105

    2007

  57. [64]

    Gemmer, M

    J. Gemmer, M. Michel, and G. Mahler, Quantum Thermody- namics: Emergence of Thermodynamic Behavior Within Com- posite Quantum Systems, 2nd ed., Springer, 2009

    2009

  58. [66]

    G. B. Mbeng, A. Russomanno, and G. E. Santoro, The quantum Ising chain for beginners, SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes, (2024) 82

    2024

  59. [67]

    E. Lieb, T. Schultz and D. Mattis, Two soluble models of an antiferromagnetic chain, Annals of Physics,16 (1961) 407-466

    1961

  60. [68]

    ˇZunkovic, A

    B. ˇZunkovic, A. Silva and M. Fabrizio, Dynamical phase tran- sitions and Loschmidt echo in the infinite-range XY model, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A: Math. Phys. Eng. Sci, 374 (2016) 20150160

    2016

  61. [69]

    A. Das, K. Sengupta, D. Sen and B. K. Chakrabarti, Infinite- range Ising ferromagnet in a time-dependent transverse mag- netic field: Quench and ac dynamics near the quantum critical point, Phys. Rev. B, 74 (2006) 144423

    2006

  62. [70]

    Gonzalez Lazo, M

    E. Gonzalez Lazo, M. Heyl, M. Dalmonte and A. Angelone, Finite-temperature critical behavior of long-range quantum Ising models, SciPost Phys, 11 (2021) 076

    2021

  63. [71]

    J. Jin, A. Biella, O. Viyuela, L. Mazza, J. Keeling, R. Fazio, and D. Rossini, Cluster mean-field approach to the steady-state phase diagram of dissipative spin systems, Phys. Rev. X, 6 (2016) 031011

    2016

  64. [72]

    El Makouri, A

    A. El Makouri, A. Slaoui, and M. Daoud, Enhancing the per- formance of coupled quantum Otto thermal machines without entanglement and quantum correlations, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys, 56 (2023) 085501

    2023

  65. [73]

    Yamamoto, Correlated cluster mean-field theory for spin systems, Phys

    D. Yamamoto, Correlated cluster mean-field theory for spin systems, Phys. Rev. B, 79 (2009) 144427

    2009

  66. [74]

    Mu ˜noz and F

    E. Mu ˜noz and F. J. Pe˜na, Quantum heat engine in the relativistic limit: The case of a Dirac particle, Phys. Rev. E, 86 (2012) 061108

    2012

  67. [75]

    Chattopadhyay and G

    P. Chattopadhyay and G. Paul, Relativistic quantum heat en- gine from uncertainty relation standpoint, Scientific reports, 9 (2019) 16967

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.