Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Ponderomotive barriers in rotating mirror devices using static fields

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A rotating plasma turns static electric and magnetic ripples into waves that exert a species-selective ponderomotive force, capable of plugging mirror ends or trapping particles in a well.

desk verdict A promising proposal for static-field ponderomotive end-plugs in rotating mirrors, but the species-selective electrostatic barrier rests on an unproven slab-to-cylinder transfer. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.02008 v1 pith:ZK4XEV4H submitted 2025-02-04 physics.plasm-ph

Tal Rubin , Nathaniel J. Fisch This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.plasm-ph
keywords ponderomotivepotentialrotatingmirrorstaticfieldperturbationsspeciesselectivityaneutronicfusionDopplershiftmagneticconfinementphase-spaceengineering
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to show that static electromagnetic perturbations, which are cheap and simple to construct, can generate ponderomotive forces inside a rotating mirror plasma without any radio-frequency power. Because the plasma rotates, a ripple that is time-independent in the lab appears as an oscillating wave in the plasma frame, and that oscillation pushes particles through the ponderomotive effect. The authors derive the resulting potentials for two perturbation classes: a magnetostatic (O-wave) ripple that produces an always-repulsive barrier, and a near-electrostatic (X-wave) ripple that produces a potential whose sign and species selectivity can be tuned through the rotation rate and polarization. If the derivation holds, rotating mirror machines and open-field-line mass separators gain a new tool for confining fuel, expelling ash, or separating species, of particular interest for aneutronic fusion schemes. The load-bearing conditions are that the plasma be tenuous and the flow slow enough that perturbed fields stay close to vacuum multipole fields, and that the plasma continue to rotate in the presence of a non-axisymmetric perturbation.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Doppler-shifted static perturbation. In the plasma frame a lab-frame-static ripple with azimuthal wavenumber $n$ (or slab wavenumber $k$) appears as a wave with frequency $\omega_{\rm wave}=kE_0/B_0$ in the slab or $n\omega_{\rm rot}$ in the cylinder. The machinery is the Lorentz-boosted cold-plasma dispersion: the O wave becomes a pure magnetic perturbation $\mathbf{B}_{\rm O}$ and yields the always-repulsive potential $\Phi_{\rm pond,O} = \frac{B_1^2 e^{2\kappa_O x}}{4 m k^2} I_0(2\kappa_O \rho)$ (slab form); the X wave becomes an almost electrostatic perturbation $\mathbf{E}_{\rm X}$ and yields $\Phi_{\rm pond,X} = \frac{e^2}{4m\omega_{\rm wave}}\left(\frac{E_L^2}{\omega_{\rm wave}+\Omega} + \frac{E_R^2}{\omega_{\rm wave}-\Omega}\right)$, whose sign flips depending on whether the wave frequency sits below or above the cyclotron resonance. These formulas carry the argument: they show that the effect is species-selective through $e/m$ and $\Omega$ and tunable through the rotation rate and perturbation polarization.

What would settle it

In a rotating mirror with a static azimuthal magnetic multipole at a throat, measure the maximum parallel energy of a test ion that is reflected; the paper predicts a barrier scaling as $\frac{B_1^2}{4 m} (R_G^2+\rho^2)^n/R^{2n}$ in the cylindrical form. If the observed reflection energy does not track this dependence on multipole order $n$, field amplitude $B_1$, and species mass, the central mechanism is refuted. For the X-wave well, the predicted sign change across the proton cyclotron resonance (around $v = \omega_{\rm wave}/\Omega = 1$) could be checked by observing whether a proton population is repelled for $v<1$ and attracted for $v>1$ at fixed field amplitude.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that a static (time-independent) azimuthal perturbation in a rotating mirror plasma appears, in the plasma frame, as a wave with a Doppler-shifted frequency, and that this wave exerts a ponderomotive force. Two families of perturbations are identified. A magnetostatic perturbation, obtained by Lorentz-boosting the O wave, creates a repulsive potential $\Phi_{\rm pond,O}$ that is positive for every species and can serve as an end plug. A near-electrostatic perturbation, obtained by Lorentz-boosting the X wave, creates a potential $\Phi_{\rm pond,X}$ whose sign and magnitude depend on the polarization and on how the shifted frequency $\omega_{\rm wave}$ compares to the cyclotron frequencies; near the ion cyclotron resonance it can attract one ion species while repelling another. The paper thereby proposes a radio-frequency-free method of phase-space engineering relevant to aneutronic fusion fuel retention and ash expulsion.

Load-bearing premise

The plasma must be tenuous enough and the rotation slow enough that the perturbation fields inside the plasma are nearly the vacuum multipole fields used to derive the ponderomotive potentials, and the device must keep the plasma rotating despite the non-axisymmetric perturbation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Rotating mirror end plugs can be built from static coils and electrodes, eliminating the cost and complexity of radio-frequency sources.
  • The X-wave potential can be tuned near an ion cyclotron resonance to eject fusion ash (e.g., boron-11) while holding fuel protons, or the reverse.
  • The O-wave magnetostatic barrier repels all species regardless of charge sign, making it a robust final barrier for both electrons and ions.
  • The same physics applies to open-field-line mass separators and isotope separators, where a species-selective attractive well can sort ions by charge-to-mass ratio.
  • Because the formulas depend explicitly on gyroradius, hotter species experience stronger barriers and wells, which could sharpen ash expulsion.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the ponderomotive force itself drives the required rotation by exerting an azimuthal torque on the plasma, the device could be self-sustaining, resolving the acknowledged need for wave-induced rotation.
  • The finite-gyroradius Bessel-function terms imply the barrier height grows with temperature, so the plug may become more effective precisely for the tail of the distribution that would otherwise escape the mirror.
  • The multipole order $n$ in the cylindrical formulas gives a spatial-shaping degree of freedom: higher $n$ localizes the barrier closer to the wall, which could be used to create narrow collar plugs at the mirror throat.
  • The same Doppler-shifted-static-field logic might extend to other rotating magnetized flows, such as planetary magnetospheres, wherever a static obstacle is swept by a rotating plasma.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper develops a theory of ponderomotive potentials generated by static, non-axisymmetric field perturbations in a rotating mirror plasma. In a slab model with uniform E×B flow, the authors classify the perturbations as O-wave and X-wave solutions, derive their evanescent penetration and polarization, Lorentz-transform them to lab-frame static fields, and identify the O-wave with a magnetostatic perturbation and the X-wave with a near-electrostatic perturbation. In cylindrical geometry, they replace the slab fields by vacuum multipole fields and present ponderomotive potentials: a repulsive barrier for the magnetostatic case (Eq. 59) and a sign-variable, species-selective potential for the electrostatic case (Eqs. 60-65). The paper proposes using the repulsive potential as an end plug and the attractive potential near the center of a rotating mirror, with cyclotron-resonance enhancement for ion species.

Significance. If established, the proposal would be significant: it offers a radio-frequency-free, static-field route to phase-space engineering in rotating mirrors, with potential application to aneutronic fuel retention and ash expulsion. The paper has clear strengths: the slab derivations are internally consistent cold-plasma theory, no quantities are fitted to data, the action-angle framework is used explicitly, time-scale inequalities are stated, and the magnetostatic cylindrical potential is obtained from a cylindrical calculation. The central device-level claim, however, currently rests on an unproven slab-to-cylinder analogy for the electrostatic case, and the acknowledged incompatibility between non-axisymmetric perturbations and maintained axisymmetric rotation is left unresolved. Therefore the significance is real but conditional on completing the cylindrical derivation or numerical verification.

major comments (3)
  1. [IV.B, Eqs. (60)-(65)] The central electrostatic barrier/well formulas for the rotating mirror are asserted, not derived. Equation (60) is the slab result with omega_wave = k E0/B0 and with the polarization coefficients taken from the slab evanescent regime; the cylindrical vacuum multipole fields (50)-(51) are never substituted into the action-angle averaging procedure based on Eqs. (43)-(45). In the cylinder the relevant Doppler-shifted frequency is n omega_rot, as indicated by the time-scale conditions in Eqs. (54)-(57), and omega_rot is species-dependent (Eq. 47); no inertial frame makes the plasma stationary, as the authors themselves note in Sec. III.B. The statement that "in the cylinder the wave vector component ky becomes n/R" does not supply the missing averaging, nor does the tenuous/low-flow limit, which only justifies the vacuum field profile. The contrast with Eq. (59), which is derived from cylindrical variables, shows that the electrostatic derivation is necessary rather than optional. As written, Eqs. (62)-(65), including the resonance enhancement near omega_wave ≈ Omega, are not established for the proposed rotating-mirror configuration.
  2. [I (last paragraph) and III.B (after Eq. (47))] The paper's application scenario assumes a maintained plasma rotation, but the authors acknowledge that "drift surfaces would not remain axisymmetric in the presence of a non-axisymmetric perturbation" and that "some form of wave-induced rotation would be necessary." This is a load-bearing issue for the device-level claim, not a cosmetic caveat: Eq. (47) and the cylindrical Hamiltonian (46) are derived for axisymmetric crossed fields, and the ponderomotive potentials in Sec. IV assume that rotation profile. The tenuous/low-flow limit invoked in Sec. III.B justifies treating the perturbation fields as vacuum multipoles, but it does not by itself justify persistence of the rotation profile under the same non-axisymmetric perturbation. The manuscript should either show self-consistency of the assumed rotation, or explicitly restrict the cylindrical claims to configurations where such rotation is maintained by a separate mechanism.
  3. [III.B and IV.B] The species-selectivity claim in the cylinder depends on transferring the slab polarization p → -i and the associated E_L, E_R coefficients to a rotating frame, but the transfer is not made. In the slab, all species share a common flow velocity v, so a single Lorentz boost puts the plasma at rest. In the cylinder, the flow velocity r omega_rot differs between species (the paper states this explicitly in Sec. III.B), so each species sees a different Doppler-shifted frequency n omega_rot and a different effective polarization; the paper does not compute these quantities or show that they reduce to the slab left-circular limit used in Eq. (60). This is a second, independent gap in the derivation of Eqs. (62)-(65).
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. II and Fig. 5 caption] There are several typos, including "Hamitonian" in Sec. II and "beign" in the caption of Fig. 5; these should be corrected.
  2. [Eq. (21)] The phrase "by the triangle inequality" is imprecise for a lower bound obtained from the square root of a sum; consider rephrasing to "from the definition of kappa_O".
  3. [Fig. 10] The figure caption and surrounding text do not state whether the full-orbit LOOPP simulation is for the slab or the cylindrical geometry, nor do they give the parameter values; please specify these so the numerical check can be reproduced and correctly attributed.
  4. [Fig. 11] Figure 11 is taken from Ref. [67] and is a slab result; the text should state this explicitly so that it is not read as a numerical validation of the cylindrical electrostatic formulas in Eqs. (62)-(65).
  5. [Eqs. (48)-(51)] The definitions of the cylindrical multipole potentials would benefit from a brief statement of the boundary conditions at r=R and of the relation between B1, E1 and the electrode/coil amplitudes, since these amplitudes enter the final ponderomotive potentials.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the ponderomotive potentials are derived from stated field configurations and dispersion relations, not fitted to or defined by the target barrier/well claim.

full rationale

This paper's central derivation is self-contained rather than circular. The ponderomotive potentials of Sec. IV are obtained by writing the perturbation Hamiltonian (52), transforming to action-angle variables (7), (43)-(45), and averaging over the fast oscillations; the coefficients in Eq. (60) come from the polarization computed from the cold-plasma dispersion in the moving frame (31), with the Doppler-shifted frequency (13) giving ωwave = kE0/B0. Eqs. (62)-(65) are algebraic limits of that expression, not fitted parameters. The cylindrical magnetic multipole potential (59) is likewise an average of A_O^2/2m over the stated cylindrical variables; it is not a renamed prediction. No quantity is calibrated to the barrier/well the paper claims. The same-group citations (Refs. 64,65,67; LOOPP; Fig. 11 taken from Ref. 67) provide context and numerical illustration, and Fig. 11 is a code-reproduced full-orbit simulation of the analytic expression, so it does not function as an unverified uniqueness theorem. Two passages do limit the claim, but neither is circular: the paper concedes that 'drift surfaces would not remain axisymmetric in the presence of a non-axisymmetric perturbation' (Sec. I), and the electrostatic cylindrical multipole (50)-(51) is never explicitly carried through the action-angle averaging used for the slab formula (60), so the slab-to-cylinder transfer for the X-wave-like potential rests on the stated tenuous/low-flow vacuum-field analogy rather than on a derivation. These are correctness/validity concerns, not reductions of the prediction to its input.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new particles, forces, or conserved quantities. The central results rest on standard Hamiltonian mechanics, cold-plasma dispersion theory, Lorentz frame transformations, and three domain assumptions specific to the rotating-mirror application: tenuous low-flow vacuum fields in the cylinder, adiabatic separation of time scales, and a compatible rotation mechanism despite non-axisymmetry. No parameters are fitted to data.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Cold-fluid dielectric response with no thermal or kinetic corrections.
    Used in equations (14)-(16) to obtain the O and X wave evanescence and polarizations; thermal and finite-Larmor-radius effects are neglected.
  • domain assumption Adiabatic separation of time scales between axial transit and gyro/rotation phases.
    The ponderomotive potential is only valid if inequalities (53)-(57) hold. The paper states these conditions but does not verify them for the proposed mirror parameters.
  • domain assumption Cylindrical rotating mirror plasma is tenuous and in the low-flow limit, so perturbations are vacuum multipole fields.
    Sec. III B says the moving-frame trick fails because species rotate at different rates, then replaces slab wave fields with vacuum multipoles. This is a modeling simplification, not derived from the cylindrical dispersion relation.
  • ad hoc to paper The non-axisymmetric ponderomotive perturbation is compatible with a maintained plasma rotation.
    The paper cites the isorotation theorem and says end-electrode biasing can arrange rotation, but then admits that a non-axisymmetric perturbation makes drift surfaces non-axisymmetric, so "some form of wave-induced rotation would be necessary" (Sec. I). This premise is stated, not demonstrated.
  • domain assumption Flute-like perturbations with kz = 0 are sufficient.
    Sec. III A states "we elect to restrict ourselves to the case of kz = 0 for simplicity," excluding axial wave structure that could alter the ponderomotive interaction in a mirror.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Ponderomotive barriers in rotating mirror devices using static fields." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZK4XEV4H

@misc{pith2026250202008,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Ponderomotive barriers in rotating mirror devices using static fields},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZK4XEV4H}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.02008}
}
abstract

Particularly for aneutronic fusion schemes, it is advantageous to manipulate the fuel species differently from one another, as well as expel ash promptly. The ponderomotive effect can be used to selectively manipulate particles. It is commonly a result of particle-wave interactions and has a complex dependence on the particle charge and mass, enabling species-selectivity. If the plasma is rotating, e.g. due to $\mathbf{E} \times \mathbf{B}$ motion, the ponderomotive effect can be generated using static (i.e., time-independent) perturbations to the electric and magnetic fields, which can be significantly cheaper to produce than time-dependent waves. This feature can be particularly useful in rotating mirror machines where mirror confinement can be enhanced by rotation, both through centrifugal confinement and additionally through a ponderomotive interaction with a static azimuthal perturbation. Some static perturbations generate a ponderomotive barrier, other perturbations can generate either a repulsive barrier or an attractive ponderomotive well which can be used to attract particles of a certain species while repelling another. The viability of each of these effects depends on the specifics of the rotation profile and temperature, and the resultant dispersion relation in the rotating plasma.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.02008 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. A schematic for the application of ponderomotive barriers in rotating mirror devices using static fields. In the Bottom [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Illustration of plasma flow through a static perturba [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Illustration of the partition of the energy by direction [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Illustration of the energy transfer from the axial [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Phase space of particles in a magnetic mirror. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. The exact dispersion relation, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. The exact dispersion relation, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Particle trajectory interacting with a magnetostatic ponderomotive barrier. In the Left figure: energies as a function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Numerical evaluation of the ponderomotive poten [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_11.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Bounce-Averaged Theory In Arbitrary Multi-Well Plasmas: Solution Domains and the Graph Structure of their Connections

    physics.plasm-ph 2025-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A set of general conditions and an algorithm for partitioning COM space into consistent bounce-averaged solution domains, with directed-graph representation of boundary connections.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

86 extracted references · 54 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Nevins \ and\ author R

    author author W. Nevins \ and\ author R. Swain ,\ https://doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/40/4/310 journal journal Nuclear Fusion \ volume 40 ,\ pages 865 ( year 2000 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1088/0029-5515/40/4/310

  2. [2]

    author author T. H. \ Rider ,\ title Fundamental Limitations on Plasma Fusion Systems Not in Thermodynamic Equilibrium ,\ @noop Ph.D. thesis ,\ school Massachusetts Institute of Technology ( year 1995 a ) NoStop

    1995

  3. [3]

    author author T. H. \ Rider ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.871273 journal journal Phys. Plasmas \ volume 2 ,\ pages 1853 ( year 1995 b ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1063/1.871273 1995

  4. [4]

    Moreau ,\ https://doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/17/1/002 journal journal Nuclear Fusion \ volume 17 ,\ pages 13 ( year 1977 ) NoStop

    author author D. Moreau ,\ https://doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/17/1/002 journal journal Nuclear Fusion \ volume 17 ,\ pages 13 ( year 1977 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1088/0029-5515/17/1/002 1977

  5. [5]

    Levush \ and\ author S

    author author B. Levush \ and\ author S. Cuperman ,\ https://doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/22/11/005 journal journal Nuclear Fusion \ volume 22 ,\ pages 1519 ( year 1982 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1088/0029-5515/22/11/005 1982

  6. [6]

    author author M. H. \ Sikora \ and\ author H. R. \ Weller ,\ https://doi.org/10.1007/s10894-016-0069-y journal journal J. Fusion Energy \ volume 35 ,\ pages 538 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1007/s10894-016-0069-y 2016

  7. [7]

    Weaver , author G

    author author T. Weaver , author G. Zimmerman ,\ and\ author L. Wood ,\ @noop title Exotic CTR Fuels: Non-thermal Effects and Laser Fusion Applications ,\ type Tech. Rep. \ ( institution California Univ. ,\ year 1973 ) NoStop

    1973

  8. [8]

    Putvinski , author D

    author author S. Putvinski , author D. Ryutov ,\ and\ author P. Yushmanov ,\ https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/ab1a60 journal journal Nuclear Fusion \ volume 59 ,\ pages 076018 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1088/1741-4326/ab1a60 2019

Show all 86 references
  1. [9]

    author author I. E. \ Ochs , author E. J. \ Kolmes , author M. E. \ Mlodik , author T. Rubin ,\ and\ author N. J. \ Fisch ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.106.055215 journal journal Physical Review E \ volume 106 ,\ pages 055215 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    doi

  2. [10]

    Cai , author H

    author author J. Cai , author H. Xie , author Y. Li , author M. Tuszewski , author H. Zhou ,\ and\ author P. Chen ,\ https://doi.org/10.1080/15361055.2021.1964309 journal journal Fusion Science and Technology \ volume 78 ,\ pages 149 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    2021

  3. [11]

    Eliezer , author Z

    author author S. Eliezer , author Z. Henis , author N. Nissim , author S. V. \ Pinhasi ,\ and\ author J. M. \ Martinez Val ,\ https://doi.org/10.1017/S0263034615000701 journal journal Laser and Particle Beams \ volume 33 ,\ pages 577 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    doi

  4. [12]

    Eliezer \ and\ author J

    author author S. Eliezer \ and\ author J. M. \ Martinez-Val ,\ https://doi.org/10.1017/S0263034619000818 journal journal Laser and Particle Beams \ volume 38 ,\ pages 39 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    2020 doi

  5. [13]

    Daponta , author S

    author author C. Daponta , author S. Moustaizis , author S. Eliezer , author Z. Henis , author P. Lalousis , author N. Nissim ,\ and\ author Y. Schweitzer ,\ https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2024.1425963 journal journal Frontiers in Physics \ volume 12 ,\ pages 1425963 ( year 2024...

    2024

  6. [14]

    Wang , author W

    author author X. Wang , author W. Liu , author D. Yang , author G. Yang , author M. Tan , author X. Jiang , author H. Xie , author Y. Shi , author H. Zhao , author Y. Wang , author Y. Liang , author J. Dong , author B. Wu ,\ and\ author C. Liu ,\ @noop journal journal Plasma S...

    2025

  7. [15]

    Belloni \ and\ author K

    author author F. Belloni \ and\ author K. Batani ,\ https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3952779 journal journal Laser and Particle Beams \ volume 2022 ,\ pages e11 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    2022 doi

  8. [16]

    Hora , author S

    author author H. Hora , author S. Eliezer , author G. Kirchhoff , author N. Nissim , author J. Wang , author P. Lalousis , author Y. Xu , author G. Miley , author J. Martinez-Val , author W. McKenzie ,\ and\ author J. Kirchhoff ,\ https://doi.org/10.1017/S0263034617000799 jour...

    doi

  9. [17]

    Qin ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0203707 journal journal Physics of Plasmas \ volume 31 ,\ pages 050601 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    author author H. Qin ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0203707 journal journal Physics of Plasmas \ volume 31 ,\ pages 050601 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    2024 doi

  10. [18]

    author author T. H. \ Stix ,\ @noop title Waves in Plasmas \ ( publisher American Institute of Physics ,\ address New York ,\ year 1992 ) NoStop

    1992

  11. [19]

    Dodin ,\ https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022377822000502 journal journal Journal of Plasma Physics \ volume 88 ,\ pages 905880407 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    author author I. Dodin ,\ https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022377822000502 journal journal Journal of Plasma Physics \ volume 88 ,\ pages 905880407 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    2022 doi

  12. [20]

    author author A. H. \ Reiman ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.864258 journal journal The Physics of Fluids \ volume 26 ,\ pages 1338 ( year 1983 ) NoStop

    1983 doi

  13. [21]

    Yoshioka , author S

    author author Y. Yoshioka , author S. Kinoshha ,\ and\ author T. Kobayashi ,\ https://doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/24/5/004 journal journal Nuclear Fusion \ volume 24 ,\ pages 565 ( year 1984 ) NoStop

    1984 doi

  14. [22]

    author author R. L. \ Haye , author R. Prater , author R. Buttery , author N. Hayashi , author A. Isayama , author M. Maraschek , author L. Urso ,\ and\ author H. Zohm ,\ https://doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/46/4/006 journal journal Nuclear Fusion \ volume 46 ,\ pages 451 ( year ...

    doi

  15. [23]

    author author A. H. \ Reiman \ and\ author N. J. \ Fisch ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.225001 journal journal Physical Review Letters \ volume 121 ,\ pages 225001 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    2018 doi

  16. [24]

    author author N. J. \ Fisch ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.59.175 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 59 ,\ pages 175 ( year 1987 ) NoStop

    1987 doi

  17. [25]

    author author N. J. \ Fisch \ and\ author J.-M. \ Rax ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.612 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 69 ,\ pages 612 ( year 1992 ) NoStop

    1992 doi

  18. [26]

    author author N. J. \ Fisch \ and\ author M. C. \ Herrmann ,\ https://doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/35/12/I40 journal journal Nucl. Fusion \ volume 35 ,\ pages 1753 ( year 1995 ) NoStop

    1995 doi

  19. [27]

    author author M. C. \ Herrmann \ and\ author N. J. \ Fisch ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.1495 journal journal Physical Review Letters \ volume 79 ,\ pages 1495 ( year 1997 ) NoStop

    1997 doi

  20. [28]

    author author I. E. \ Ochs , author N. Bertelli ,\ and\ author N. J. \ Fisch ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4928903 journal journal Physics of Plasmas \ volume 22 ,\ pages 082119 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    2015 doi

  21. [29]

    Gaponov \ and\ author MA

    author author AV . Gaponov \ and\ author MA . Miller ,\ @noop journal journal Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics \ volume 34 ,\ pages 242 ( year 1958 ) NoStop

    1958

  22. [30]

    author author A. J. \ Lichtenberg \ and\ author M. A. \ Lieberman ,\ https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4257-2 title Regular and Stochastic Motion ,\ series Applied Mathematical Sciences , Vol. volume 38 \ ( publisher Springer New York ,\ address New York, NY ,\ year 1983 ) NoStop

    doi

  23. [31]

    Miller , author I

    author author T. Miller , author I. Be'ery , author E. Gudinetsky ,\ and\ author I. Barth ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0147925 journal journal Physics of Plasmas \ volume 30 ,\ pages 072510 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    2023 doi

  24. [32]

    Motz \ and\ author C

    author author H. Motz \ and\ author C. Watson ,\ in\ https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2539(08)60061-X booktitle Advances in Electronics and Electron Physics ,\ Vol. volume 23 \ ( publisher Elsevier ,\ year 1967 )\ pp.\ pages 153--302 NoStop

    1967 doi

  25. [33]

    Gormezano ,\ https://doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/19/8/008 journal journal Nuclear Fusion \ volume 19 ,\ pages 1085 ( year 1979 ) NoStop

    author author C. Gormezano ,\ https://doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/19/8/008 journal journal Nuclear Fusion \ volume 19 ,\ pages 1085 ( year 1979 ) NoStop

    1979 doi

  26. [34]

    author author R. F. \ Post ,\ https://doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/27/10/001 journal journal Nucl. Fusion \ volume 27 ,\ pages 1579 ( year 1987 ) NoStop

    1987 doi

  27. [35]

    Dimonte , author B

    author author G. Dimonte , author B. M. \ Lamb ,\ and\ author G. J. \ Morales ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.48.1352 journal journal Physical Review Letters \ volume 48 ,\ pages 1352 ( year 1982 ) NoStop

    1982 doi

  28. [36]

    Chu ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.70.685 journal journal Reviews of Modern Physics \ volume 70 ,\ pages 685 ( year 1998 ) NoStop

    author author S. Chu ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.70.685 journal journal Reviews of Modern Physics \ volume 70 ,\ pages 685 ( year 1998 ) NoStop

    1998 doi

  29. [37]

    author author C. N. \ Cohen-Tannoudji ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.70.707 journal journal Reviews of Modern Physics \ volume 70 ,\ pages 707 ( year 1998 ) NoStop

    1998 doi

  30. [38]

    Guglielmi \ and\ author R

    author author A. Guglielmi \ and\ author R. Lundin ,\ https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JA900066 journal journal Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics \ volume 106 ,\ pages 13219 ( year 2001 ) NoStop

    2001 doi

  31. [39]

    author author P. K. \ Shukla \ and\ author R. Schlickeiser ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1568119 journal journal Physics of Plasmas \ volume 10 ,\ pages 1523 ( year 2003 ) NoStop

    2003 doi

  32. [40]

    author author I. Y. \ Dodin \ and\ author N. J. \ Fisch ,\ https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022377804003174 journal journal Journal of Plasma Physics \ volume 71 ,\ pages 289 ( year 2005 ) NoStop

    2005 doi

  33. [41]

    author author A. V. \ Burdakov \ and\ author V. V. \ Postupaev ,\ in\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4964241 booktitle Open Magnetic Systems for Plasma Confinement ( OS2016 ): Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Open Magnetic Systems for Plasma Confinement \ ( addre...

    doi

  34. [42]

    Fowler , author R

    author author T. Fowler , author R. Moir ,\ and\ author T. Simonen ,\ https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/aa5e54 journal journal Nuclear Fusion \ volume 57 ,\ pages 056014 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    2017 doi

  35. [43]

    Be'ery , author A

    author author I. Be'ery , author A. Gertsman ,\ and\ author O. Seeman ,\ https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6587/aadd69 journal journal Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion \ volume 60 ,\ pages 115004 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    2018 doi

  36. [44]

    White , author A

    author author R. White , author A. Hassam ,\ and\ author A. Brizard ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5003359 journal journal Physics of Plasmas \ volume 25 ,\ pages 012514 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    2018 doi

  37. [45]

    author author A. A. \ Ivanov \ and\ author V. V. \ Prikhodko ,\ https://doi.org/10.1088/0741-3335/55/6/063001 journal journal Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion \ volume 55 ,\ pages 063001 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    2013 doi

  38. [46]

    Endrizzi , author J

    author author D. Endrizzi , author J. Anderson , author M. Brown , author J. Egedal , author B. Geiger , author R. Harvey , author M. Ialovega , author J. Kirch , author E. Peterson , author Yu.V . Petrov , author J. Pizzo , author T. Qian , author K. Sanwalka , author O. Schm...

    doi

  39. [47]

    author author N. R. \ Schwartz , author I. G. \ Abel , author A. B. \ Hassam , author M. Kelly ,\ and\ author C. A. \ Romero-Talam \'a s ,\ https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022377824000424 journal journal Journal of Plasma Physics \ volume 90 ,\ pages 905900217 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    doi

  40. [48]

    author author E. S. \ Weibel ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.44.377 journal journal Physical Review Letters \ volume 44 ,\ pages 377 ( year 1980 ) NoStop

    1980 doi

  41. [49]

    Gueroult , author J.-M

    author author R. Gueroult , author J.-M. \ Rax ,\ and\ author N. J. \ Fisch ,\ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.066 journal journal J. Clean. Prod. \ volume 182 ,\ pages 1060 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    2018 doi

  42. [50]

    Gueroult , author D

    author author R. Gueroult , author D. T. \ Hobbs ,\ and\ author N. J. \ Fisch ,\ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.04.058 journal journal J. Hazard. Mater. \ volume 297 ,\ pages 153 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    2015 doi

  43. [51]

    Gueroult \ and\ author N

    author author R. Gueroult \ and\ author N. J. \ Fisch ,\ https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-0252/23/3/035002 journal journal Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. \ volume 23 ,\ pages 035002 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    2014 doi

  44. [52]

    Gueroult , author J.-M

    author author R. Gueroult , author J.-M. \ Rax ,\ and\ author N. J. \ Fisch ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4864325 journal journal Physics of Plasmas \ volume 21 ,\ pages 020701 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    2014 doi

  45. [53]

    Ohkawa \ and\ author R

    author author T. Ohkawa \ and\ author R. L. \ Miller ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1523930 journal journal Phys. Plasmas \ volume 9 ,\ pages 5116 ( year 2002 ) NoStop

    2002 doi

  46. [54]

    author author A. J. \ Fetterman \ and\ author N. J. \ Fisch ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3631793 journal journal Phys. Plasmas \ volume 18 ,\ pages 094503 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    2011 doi

  47. [55]

    author author A. P. \ Oiler , author R. A. \ Usmanov , author N. N. \ Antonov , author A. V. \ Gavrikov ,\ and\ author V. P. \ Smirnov ,\ https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063780X24600579 journal journal Plasma Physics Reports \ volume 50 ,\ pages 588 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    doi

  48. [56]

    Hidekuma , author S

    author author S. Hidekuma , author S. Hiroe , author T. Watari , author T. Shoji , author T. Sato ,\ and\ author K. Takayama ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.33.1537 journal journal Physical Review Letters \ volume 33 ,\ pages 1537 ( year 1974 ) NoStop

    doi

  49. [57]

    Hiroe , author S

    author author S. Hiroe , author S. Hidekuma , author T. Watari , author T. Shoji , author T. Sato ,\ and\ author K. Takayama ,\ https://doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/15/5/006 journal journal Nuclear Fusion \ volume 15 ,\ pages 769 ( year 1975 ) NoStop

    doi

  50. [58]

    author author D. A. \ Dolgolenko \ and\ author Yu. A. Muromkin ,\ https://doi.org/10.3367/UFNe.2016.12.038016 journal journal Phys.-Usp. \ volume 60 ,\ pages 994 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    2016 doi

  51. [59]

    author author A. V. \ Timofeev ,\ https://doi.org/10.3367/UFNe.0184.201410g.1101 journal journal Physics-Uspekhi \ volume 57 ,\ pages 990 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    2014

  52. [60]

    Litvak , author S

    author author A. Litvak , author S. Agnew , author F. Anderegg , author B. Cluggish , author R. Freeman , author J. Gilleland , author R. Isler , author W. Lee , author R. Miller ,\ and\ author T. Ohkawa ,\ in\ @noop booktitle 30th EPS Conference on Contr . Fusion and Plasma P...

    2003

  53. [61]

    author author N. A. \ Vorona , author A. V. \ Gavrikov , author A. A. \ Samokhin , author V. P. \ Smirnov ,\ and\ author Yu . S. \ Khomyakov ,\ https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063778815140148 journal journal Physics of Atomic Nuclei \ volume 78 ,\ pages 1624 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    doi

  54. [62]

    author author I. Y. \ Dodin , author N. J. \ Fisch ,\ and\ author J.-M. \ Rax ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1787771 journal journal Phys. Plasmas \ volume 11 ,\ pages 5046 ( year 2004 ) NoStop

    2004 doi

  55. [63]

    Dodin \ and\ author N

    author author I. Dodin \ and\ author N. Fisch ,\ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2005.09.049 journal journal Physics Letters A \ volume 349 ,\ pages 356 ( year 2006 ) NoStop

    2005 doi

  56. [64]

    Rubin , author J

    author author T. Rubin , author J. Rax ,\ and\ author N. Fisch ,\ https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022377823001307 journal journal Journal of Plasma Physics \ volume 89 ,\ pages 905890615 ( year 2023 a ) NoStop

    2023 doi

  57. [65]

    Rubin , author J

    author author T. Rubin , author J. M. \ Rax ,\ and\ author N. J. \ Fisch ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0145042 journal journal Physics of Plasmas \ volume 30 ,\ pages 052501 ( year 2023 b ) NoStop

    2023 doi

  58. [66]

    author author I. E. \ Ochs \ and\ author N. J. \ Fisch ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.108.065210 journal journal Physical Review E \ volume 108 ,\ pages 065210 ( year 2023 a ) NoStop

    2023 doi

  59. [67]

    Rubin , author I

    author author T. Rubin , author I. E. \ Ochs ,\ and\ author N. J. \ Fisch ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0222129 journal journal Physics of Plasmas \ volume 31 ,\ pages 082109 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    2024 doi

  60. [68]

    author author V. C. A. \ Ferraro ,\ https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/97.6.458 journal journal Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society \ volume 97 ,\ pages 458 ( year 1937 ) NoStop

    1937 doi

  61. [69]

    author author E. Noether ,\ @noop journal journal Nachrichten von der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu G \"o ttingen, Mathematisch-Physikalische Klasse \ volume 1918 ,\ pages 235 ( year 1918 ) NoStop

    1918

  62. [70]

    author author M. S. \ Ioffe \ and\ author B. B. \ Kadomtsev ,\ https://doi.org/10.1070/PU1970v013n02ABEH004208 journal journal Soviet Physics Uspekhi \ volume 13 ,\ pages 225 ( year 1970 ) NoStop

    1970 doi

  63. [71]

    author author A. A. \ Bekhtenev , author V. I. \ Volosov , author V. E. \ Pal'chikov , author M. S. \ Pekker ,\ and\ author Y. N. \ Yudin ,\ https://doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/20/5/007 journal journal Nuclear Fusion \ volume 20 ,\ pages 579 ( year 1980 ) NoStop

    doi

  64. [72]

    Lehnert ,\ https://doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/11/5/010 journal journal Nucl

    author author B. Lehnert ,\ https://doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/11/5/010 journal journal Nucl. Fusion \ volume 11 ,\ pages 485 ( year 1971 ) NoStop

    1971 doi

  65. [73]

    author author I. E. \ Ochs , author M. E. \ Mlodik ,\ and\ author N. J. \ Fisch ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0228464 journal journal Physics of Plasmas \ volume 31 ,\ pages 083303 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    2024 doi

  66. [74]

    Cary ,\ https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-1573(81)90175-7 journal journal Physics Reports \ volume 79 ,\ pages 129 ( year 1981 ) NoStop

    author author J. Cary ,\ https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-1573(81)90175-7 journal journal Physics Reports \ volume 79 ,\ pages 129 ( year 1981 ) NoStop

    1981 doi

  67. [75]

    Deprit ,\ https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01230629 journal journal Celestial Mechanics \ volume 1 ,\ pages 12 ( year 1969 ) NoStop

    author author A. Deprit ,\ https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01230629 journal journal Celestial Mechanics \ volume 1 ,\ pages 12 ( year 1969 ) NoStop

    1969 doi

  68. [76]

    author author R. L. \ Dewar ,\ https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/9/12/010 journal journal Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General \ volume 9 ,\ pages 2043 ( year 1976 ) NoStop

    1976 doi

  69. [77]

    Zhao \ and\ author H

    author author S. Zhao \ and\ author H. Lei ,\ https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-024-10347-x journal journal Nonlinear Dynamics \ volume 113 ,\ pages 2183 ( year 2025 ) NoStop

    2025 doi

  70. [78]

    Kolmes , author I

    author author E. Kolmes , author I. Ochs ,\ and\ author N. Fisch ,\ https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022377824000205 journal journal Journal of Plasma Physics \ volume 90 ,\ pages 905900203 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    2024 doi

  71. [79]

    Tran , author S

    author author A. Tran , author S. J. \ Frank , author A. Y. \ Le , author A. J. \ Stanier , author B. A. \ Wetherton , author J. Egedal , author D. A. \ Endrizzi , author R. W. \ Harvey , author Y. V. \ Petrov , author T. M. \ Qian , author K. Sanwalka , author J. Viola , auth...

    doi arXiv

  72. [80]

    Brillouin ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.67.260 journal journal Physical Review \ volume 67 ,\ pages 260 ( year 1945 ) NoStop

    author author L. Brillouin ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.67.260 journal journal Physical Review \ volume 67 ,\ pages 260 ( year 1945 ) NoStop

    1945 doi

  73. [81]

    author author R. C. \ Davidson ,\ @noop title Physics of Nonneutral Plasmas Addison-Wesley , Red-wood City \ ( publisher California ,\ year 1990 ) NoStop

    1990

  74. [82]

    Zenitani \ and\ author T

    author author S. Zenitani \ and\ author T. Umeda ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5051077 journal journal Physics of Plasmas \ volume 25 ,\ pages 112110 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    2018 doi

  75. [83]

    author author J. P. \ Boris ,\ in\ @noop booktitle Proc. Fourth Conf. Num . Sim . Plasmas \ ( year 1970 )\ pp.\ pages 3--67 NoStop

    1970

  76. [84]

    Qin , author S

    author author H. Qin , author S. Zhang , author J. Xiao , author J. Liu , author Y. Sun ,\ and\ author W. M. \ Tang ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4818428 journal journal Phys. Plasmas \ volume 20 ,\ pages 084503 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    2013 doi

  77. [85]

    author author I. E. \ Ochs \ and\ author N. J. \ Fisch ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.025003 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 127 ,\ pages 025003 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    2021 doi

  78. [86]

    author author I. E. \ Ochs \ and\ author N. J. \ Fisch ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0138384 journal journal Physics of Plasmas \ volume 30 ,\ pages 022102 ( year 2023 b ) NoStop

    2023 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.