pith. sign in

arxiv: 2502.02073 · v1 · submitted 2025-02-04 · ⚛️ physics.chem-ph

Two-dimensional fluorescence spectroscopy with quantum entangled photons and time- and frequency-resolved two-photon coincidence detection

Yuta Fujihashi , Ozora Iso , Ryosuke Shimizu , Akihito Ishizaki This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 04:35 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.chem-ph
keywords quantum entangled photonstwo-dimensional fluorescence spectroscopycoincidence detectionnonlinear optical processesspontaneous emissionmolecular dynamicsphoton pairstime-resolved spectroscopy
0
0 comments X

The pith

Entangled photon pairs allow two-dimensional fluorescence spectra of molecules to be measured with existing single-photon detectors without multiple pulsed lasers.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes a quantum spectroscopy technique that uses pairs of entangled photons to excite molecules and records the emitted fluorescence via time- and frequency-resolved coincidence detection. This setup produces two-dimensional spectra without any need to control or synchronize multiple pulsed lasers. The measured signal arises solely from the spontaneous emission process, which eliminates many of the overlapping nonlinear contributions that complicate conventional two-dimensional electronic spectra. Theoretical estimates of photon-pair flux and detection efficiency indicate that the resulting coincidence counts reach levels already measurable with present-day single-photon counters, making the method experimentally practicable.

Core claim

Irradiating molecules with quantum entangled photon pairs and performing time- and frequency-resolved two-photon coincidence detection on the subsequent fluorescence yields two-dimensional spectra that require neither multiple-laser control nor complex nonlinear optical responses beyond spontaneous emission, while the calculated intensities remain detectable by existing photon-counting technology.

What carries the argument

Time- and frequency-resolved two-photon coincidence detection of fluorescence induced by entangled photon pairs.

If this is right

  • Two-dimensional spectra become accessible without synchronized multiple pulsed lasers.
  • Spectral features simplify because only spontaneous emission contributes to the detected signal.
  • Signal intensities reach levels measurable with existing single-photon detection hardware.
  • Real-time observation of molecular dynamic processes with entangled photons becomes experimentally feasible.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The coincidence-based readout could be combined with other quantum-light sources to target different nonlinear pathways.
  • Extension to longer time windows might allow direct tracking of coherent molecular evolution.
  • Similar detection schemes could be applied to solid-state or biological samples where laser complexity is a limiting factor.

Load-bearing premise

The modeled photon-pair intensity and overall detection efficiency produce coincidence signals strong enough for reliable measurement with current single-photon counters.

What would settle it

An experiment that records the actual coincidence rates under the proposed illumination conditions and finds them below the noise floor or counting threshold of standard single-photon detectors.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.02073 by Akihito Ishizaki, Ozora Iso, Ryosuke Shimizu, Yuta Fujihashi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic of the proposed quantum spectroscopy. A pu [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. 2D spectra obtained by the quantum spectroscopy desc [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) Impact of the time resolution of the detector on th [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Two-photon spectral intensity, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Recent theoretical studies in quantum spectroscopy have emphasized the potential of non-classical correlations in entangled photon pairs for selectively targeting specific nonlinear optical processes in nonlinear optical responses. However, because of the extremely low intensity of the nonlinear optical signal generated by irradiating molecules with entangled photon pairs, time-resolved spectroscopic measurements using entangled photons have yet to be experimentally implemented. In this paper, we theoretically propose a quantum spectroscopy measurement employing a time-resolved fluorescence approach that aligns with the capabilities of current photon detection technologies. The proposed quantum spectroscopy affords two remarkable advantages over conventional two-dimensional electronic spectroscopy. First, it enables the acquisition of two-dimensional spectra without requiring control over multiple pulsed lasers. Second, it reduces the complexity of the spectra because the spectroscopic signal is contingent upon the nonlinear optical process of spontaneous emission. These advantages are similar to those achieved in a previous study [Fujihashi et al., J. Chem. Phys. 160, 104201 (2024)]. However, our approach achieves sufficient signal intensities that can be readily detected using existing photon detection technologies, thereby rendering it a practicable. Our findings will potentially facilitate the first experimental real-time observation of dynamic processes in molecular systems using quantum entangled photon pairs.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a theoretical scheme for two-dimensional fluorescence spectroscopy that uses entangled photon pairs generated by spontaneous parametric down-conversion, combined with time- and frequency-resolved two-photon coincidence detection of the resulting fluorescence. It claims two main advantages over conventional two-dimensional electronic spectroscopy: acquisition of 2D spectra without control over multiple pulsed lasers, and reduced spectral complexity because the detected signal arises from the nonlinear process of spontaneous emission. The central assertion is that the approach yields coincidence count rates high enough to be measured with existing single-photon detectors, thereby making quantum spectroscopy with entangled photons experimentally practicable for the first time.

Significance. If the quantitative estimates of signal strength hold under realistic conditions, the work would remove a major barrier to experimental implementation of quantum-enhanced nonlinear spectroscopy and could enable the first real-time observations of molecular dynamics using entangled-photon pairs. The proposal builds directly on prior theoretical studies by addressing the intensity limitation while retaining the advantages of non-classical correlations for selective targeting of nonlinear responses.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that the method 'achieves sufficient signal intensities that can be readily detected using existing photon detection technologies' is load-bearing for the practicability conclusion, yet the abstract (and the modeling sections) provide no explicit rate equations, numerical values for coincidence rates, or sensitivity analysis with respect to SPDC brightness, collection solid angle, or detector efficiency.
  2. [Modeling of photon-pair intensity and detection efficiency] The section on photon-pair intensity and detection efficiency: the conversion of two-photon absorption cross-section, source brightness, and quantum efficiency into expected coincidence rate must include error propagation or parameter ranges; an optimistic assumption by even one order of magnitude in any input would falsify the assertion that the signals are immediately detectable with current counters.
minor comments (2)
  1. Figure captions and axis labels should explicitly state the units and the precise coincidence window used in the time-resolved detection scheme.
  2. The comparison to Fujihashi et al. (2024) would benefit from a side-by-side table of predicted count rates under identical source parameters.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address the major comments point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that the method 'achieves sufficient signal intensities that can be readily detected using existing photon detection technologies' is load-bearing for the practicability conclusion, yet the abstract (and the modeling sections) provide no explicit rate equations, numerical values for coincidence rates, or sensitivity analysis with respect to SPDC brightness, collection solid angle, or detector efficiency.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract would be strengthened by including a representative numerical estimate of the coincidence rate to support the practicability claim. The main text contains modeling of the photon-pair intensity and detection based on standard literature values for two-photon absorption cross sections, SPDC brightness, and efficiencies, but we will revise both the abstract and the modeling sections to include explicit rate equations, example numerical values, and a basic sensitivity discussion with respect to the key parameters mentioned. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Modeling of photon-pair intensity and detection efficiency] The section on photon-pair intensity and detection efficiency: the conversion of two-photon absorption cross-section, source brightness, and quantum efficiency into expected coincidence rate must include error propagation or parameter ranges; an optimistic assumption by even one order of magnitude in any input would falsify the assertion that the signals are immediately detectable with current counters.

    Authors: This concern about robustness is well taken. Our estimates rely on representative values drawn from the experimental literature, but to address potential sensitivity to parameter choice we will expand the section to present a range of plausible input values (SPDC brightness, collection solid angle, detector efficiency) and show the resulting coincidence rates. We will also incorporate a discussion of uncertainty or error propagation for the conversion steps where quantitative data permit. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is independent modeling of signal intensity.

full rationale

The paper presents a theoretical proposal for a fluorescence-based quantum spectroscopy scheme. Its central practicability claim rests on a quantitative model converting two-photon absorption cross-section, SPDC brightness, collection angle, and detector efficiency into expected coincidence rates. No equations, fitted parameters, or predictions are shown to reduce by construction to the target result itself. The single self-citation to prior work by overlapping authors (Fujihashi et al.) is invoked only for conceptual similarities in advantages and is not load-bearing for the new intensity calculation or the assertion of experimental viability. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks and does not match any enumerated circularity pattern.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard quantum-optical descriptions of entangled-pair generation, molecular response functions, and photon-detection efficiencies; no new free parameters, ad-hoc axioms, or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • standard math Standard assumptions of quantum optics and perturbative molecular response theory govern the interaction of entangled photons with molecules.
    The proposal implicitly relies on these established frameworks to predict signal intensities and spectral features.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5754 in / 1195 out tokens · 34957 ms · 2026-05-23T04:35:50.964704+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 69 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Figure 3 presents 2D spectra obtained with quantum spectroscopy for various values of σt

    Impact of the time resolution of the detector on the 2D spectra We explore the impact of the time resolution of the detec- tor on the 2D spectra. Figure 3 presents 2D spectra obtained with quantum spectroscopy for various values of σt. The en- tanglement time is set to Te = 1600 fs. All other parameters in Fig. 3 are consistent with those in Fig. 2. As th...

    work page

  2. [2]

    The detector’s time resolution is set to σt = 400 fs

    Impact of the entanglement time on the 2D spectra Figure 4 illustrates 2D spectra obtained with quantum spec- troscopy for varying values of the entanglement time. The detector’s time resolution is set to σt = 400 fs. Other pa- rameters in Fig. 4 are consistent with those in Fig. 2. While the frequency resolution along the fluorescence photon’s fr e- quenc...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Mukamel, M

    S. Mukamel, M. Freyberger, W. Schleich, M. Bellini, A. Za - vatta, G. Leuchs, C. Silberhorn, R. W. Boyd, L. L. S´ anchez- Soto, A. Stefanov, M. Barbieri, A. Paterova, L. Krivitsky, S. Shwartz, K. Tamasaku, K. Dorfman, F. Schlawin, V . San- doghdar, M. Raymer, A. Marcus, O. V arnavski, T. Goodson, III, Z.-Y . Zhou, B.-S. Shi, S. Asban, M. Scully, G. Agarwa...

    work page 2020

  4. [4]

    N. P . Georgiades, E. Polzik, K. Edamatsu, H. Kimble, and A. Parkins, Nonclassical excitation for atoms in a squeezed vac- uum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3426 (1995)

    work page 1995

  5. [5]

    N. P . Georgiades, E. Polzik, and H. Kimble, Atoms as nonli n- ear mixers for detection of quantum correlations at ultrahi gh frequencies, Phys. Rev. A 55, R1605 (1997)

    work page 1997

  6. [6]

    H.-B. Fei, B. M. Jost, S. Popescu, B. E. A. Saleh, and M. C. Teich, Entanglement-induced two-photon transparency, Ph ys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1679 (1997)

    work page 1997

  7. [7]

    Lee and T

    D.-I. Lee and T. Goodson, III, Entangled photon absorpti on in an organic porphyrin dendrimer, J. Phys. Chem. B 110, 25582 (2006)

    work page 2006

  8. [8]

    Schlawin, Two-photon absorption cross sections of pu lsed entangled beams, J

    F. Schlawin, Two-photon absorption cross sections of pu lsed entangled beams, J. Chem. Phys. 160 (2024)

    work page 2024

  9. [9]

    Pandya, P

    R. Pandya, P . Cameron, C. V erni` ere, B. Courme, S. Ithurr ia, A. Chin, E. Lhuillier, and H. Defienne, Towards robust de- tection of entangled two-photon absorption, arXiv:2410.0 6199 (2024)

    work page 2024

  10. [10]

    Oka, Two-photon absorption by spectrally shaped enta ngled photons, Phys

    H. Oka, Two-photon absorption by spectrally shaped enta ngled photons, Phys. Rev. A 97, 033814 (2018)

    work page 2018

  11. [11]

    C. S. Mu˜ noz, G. Frascella, and F. Schlawin, Quantum metr ol- ogy of two-photon absorption, Phys. Rev. Research 3, 033250 (2021)

    work page 2021

  12. [12]

    Matsuzaki and T

    K. Matsuzaki and T. Tahara, Superresolution concentra tion 9 measurement realized by sub-shot-noise absorption spec- troscopy, Nat. Commun. 13, 1 (2022)

    work page 2022

  13. [13]

    Matsuzaki and T

    K. Matsuzaki and T. Tahara, Sub-shot-noise circular di chroism spectroscopy for the accelerated characterization of mole cular chirality, ACS Photonics 11, 1376 (2024)

    work page 2024

  14. [14]

    D. A. Kalashnikov, A. V . Paterova, S. P . Kulik, and L. A. K riv- itsky, Infrared spectroscopy with visible light, Nat. Phot on. 10, 98 (2016)

    work page 2016

  15. [15]

    Mukai, R

    Y . Mukai, R. Okamoto, and S. Takeuchi, Quantum fourier- transform infrared spectroscopy in the fingerprint region, Opt. Express 30, 22624 (2022)

    work page 2022

  16. [16]

    Tashima, Y

    T. Tashima, Y . Mukai, M. Arahata, N. Oda, M. Hisamitsu, K. Tokuda, R. Okamoto, and S. Takeuchi, Ultra-broadband quantum infrared spectroscopy, Optica 11, 81 (2024)

    work page 2024

  17. [17]

    Albarelli, E

    F. Albarelli, E. Bisketzi, A. Khan, and A. Datta, Fundam ental limits of pulsed quantum light spectroscopy: Dipole moment estimation, Phys. Rev. A 107, 062601 (2023)

    work page 2023

  18. [18]

    A. Khan, F. Albarelli, and A. Datta, Does entanglement e nhance single-molecule pulsed biphoton spectroscopy?, Quantum S ci. Technol. 9, 035004 (2024)

    work page 2024

  19. [19]

    Darsheshdar, A

    E. Darsheshdar, A. Khan, F. Albarelli, and A. Datta, Rol e of chirping in pulsed single-photon spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. A 110, 043710 (2024)

    work page 2024

  20. [20]

    Rodriguez-Camargo, H

    C. Rodriguez-Camargo, H. Gestsson, C. Nation, A. Jones , and A. Olaya-Castro, Perturbation theory scope for predicting vi- bronic selectivity by entangled two photon absorption, arX iv preprint arXiv:2412.12402 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  21. [21]

    Roslyak and S

    O. Roslyak and S. Mukamel, Multidimensional pump-prob e spectroscopy with entangled twin-photon states, Phys. Rev . A 79, 063409 (2009)

    work page 2009

  22. [22]

    M. G. Raymer, A. H. Marcus, J. R. Widom, and D. L. P . Vitullo, Entangled photon-pair two-dimensional fluoresce nce spectroscopy (EPP-2DFS), J. Phys. Chem. B 117, 15559 (2013)

    work page 2013

  23. [23]

    Schlawin, K

    F. Schlawin, K. E. Dorfman, and S. Mukamel, Pump-probe spectroscopy using quantum light with two-photon coincide nce detection, Phys. Rev. A 93, 023807 (2016)

    work page 2016

  24. [24]

    Zhang, T

    Z. Zhang, T. Peng, X. Nie, G. S. Agarwal, and M. O. Scully, Entangled photons enabled time-frequency-resolved coher ent raman spectroscopy and applications to electronic coheren ces at femtosecond scale, Light Sci. Appl. 11, 1 (2022)

    work page 2022

  25. [25]

    L. Ko, R. L. Cook, and K. B. Whaley, Emulating quantum en- tangled biphoton spectroscopy using classical light pulse s, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 14, 8050 (2023)

    work page 2023

  26. [26]

    Ishizaki, Probing excited-state dynamics with quan tum en- tangled photons: Correspondence to coherent multidimensi onal spectroscopy, J

    A. Ishizaki, Probing excited-state dynamics with quan tum en- tangled photons: Correspondence to coherent multidimensi onal spectroscopy, J. Chem. Phys. 153, 051102 (2020)

    work page 2020

  27. [27]

    F. Chen, B. Gu, and S. Mukamel, Monitoring wavepacket dy - namics at conical intersections by entangled two-photon ab - sorption, ACS Photonics 9, 1889 (2022)

    work page 2022

  28. [28]

    B. Gu, S. Sun, F. Chen, and S. Mukamel, Photoelectron spe c- troscopy with entangled photons; enhanced spectrotempora l resolution, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 120 (2023)

    work page 2023

  29. [29]

    Fujihashi, K

    Y . Fujihashi, K. Miwa, M. Higashi, and A. Ishizaki, Prob - ing exciton dynamics with spectral selectivity through the use of quantum entangled photons, J. Chem. Phys. 159, 114201 (2023)

    work page 2023

  30. [30]

    K. E. Dorfman, F. Schlawin, and S. Mukamel, Stimulated R a- man spectroscopy with entangled light: Enhanced resolutio n and pathway selection, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 5, 2843 (2014)

    work page 2014

  31. [31]

    which path- way

    S. Asban and S. Mukamel, Distinguishability and “which path- way” information in multidimensional interferometric spe c- troscopy with a single entangled photon-pair, Sci. Adv. 7, eabj4566 (2021)

    work page 2021

  32. [32]

    Kizmann, H

    M. Kizmann, H. K. Yadalam, V . Y . Chernyak, and S. Mukamel, Quantum interferometry and pathway selectivity in the nonl in- ear response of photosynthetic excitons, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 120, e2304737120 (2023)

    work page 2023

  33. [33]

    H. K. Yadalam, M. Kizmann, J. R. Rouxel, Y . Nam, V . Y . Chernyak, and S. Mukamel, Quantum interferometric pathway selectivity in di fference-frequency-generation spectroscopy, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 14, 10803 (2023)

    work page 2023

  34. [34]

    Fujihashi, A

    Y . Fujihashi, A. Ishizaki, and R. Shimizu, Pathway sele ctiv- ity in time-resolved spectroscopy using two-photon coincidence counting with quantum entangled photons, J. Chem. Phys. 160 (2024)

    work page 2024

  35. [35]

    Kim, Practical method for achieving single-photon f emtosec- ond time-resolved spectroscopy: Transient stimulated emi s- sion, J

    J. Kim, Practical method for achieving single-photon f emtosec- ond time-resolved spectroscopy: Transient stimulated emi s- sion, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 15, 5407 (2024)

    work page 2024

  36. [36]

    H. K. Yadalam, M. Kizmann, and S. Mukamel, Ultrafast four-wave-mixing spectroscopy with two vacuum fields and coincidence-double-heterodyne detection, Optica Quantu m 2, 330 (2024)

    work page 2024

  37. [37]

    J. J. Fan, Z.-Y . Ou, and Z. Zhang, Entangled photons enab led ultrafast stimulated raman spectroscopy for molecular dyn am- ics, Light Sci. Appl. 13, 163 (2024)

    work page 2024

  38. [38]

    Jadoun, Z

    D. Jadoun, Z. Zhang, and M. Kowalewski, Raman spectrosc opy of conical intersections using entangled photons, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 15, 2023 (2024)

    work page 2023

  39. [39]

    Landes, M

    T. Landes, M. Allgaier, S. Merkouche, B. J. Smith, A. H. M ar- cus, and M. G. Raymer, Experimental feasibility of molecula r two-photon absorption with isolated time-frequency-enta ngled photon pairs, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 033154 (2021)

    work page 2021

  40. [40]

    K. M. Parzuchowski, A. Mikhaylov, M. D. Mazurek, R. N. Wi l- son, D. J. Lum, T. Gerrits, C. H. Camp Jr, M. J. Stevens, and R. Jimenez, Setting bounds on entangled two-photon absorption cross sections in common fluorophores, Phys. Rev. Applied 15, 044012 (2021)

    work page 2021

  41. [41]

    M. G. Raymer, T. Landes, M. Allgaier, S. Merkouche, B. J. Smith, and A. H. Marcus, How large is the quantum enhance- ment of two-photon absorption by time-frequency entangle- ment of photon pairs?, Optica 8, 757 (2021)

    work page 2021

  42. [42]

    Scarcelli and S

    G. Scarcelli and S. H. Y un, Entangled-photon coinciden ce flu- orescence imaging, Opt. Express 16, 16189 (2008)

    work page 2008

  43. [43]

    Fujihashi, R

    Y . Fujihashi, R. Shimizu, and A. Ishizaki, Generation o f pseudo-sunlight via quantum entangled photons and the inte r- action with molecules, Phys. Rev. Research 2, 023256 (2020)

    work page 2020

  44. [44]

    Harper, B

    N. Harper, B. P . Hickam, M. He, and S. K. Cushing, Entan- gled photon correlations allow a continuous-wave laser dio de to measure single-photon, time-resolved fluorescence, J. P hys. Chem. Lett. 14, 5805 (2023)

    work page 2023

  45. [45]

    Eshun, X

    A. Eshun, X. Yi, A. Wilson, S. Jeppson, J. H. Y oo, S. Kiann e- jad, M. Rushford, T. Bond, and T. Laurence, Fluorescence lif e- time measurements using photon pair correlations generated via spontaneous parametric down conversion (spdc), Opt. Expre ss 31, 26935 (2023)

    work page 2023

  46. [46]

    T. B. G¨ abler, N. Jain, P . Then, C. Eggeling, M. Gr¨ afe, and V . F. Gili, Benchmarking of fluorescence lifetime measurements using time-frequency correlated photons, arXiv:2501.088 70 (2025)

    work page 2025

  47. [47]

    Q. Li, K. Orcutt, R. L. Cook, J. Sabines-Chesterking, A. L. Tong, G. S. Schlau-Cohen, X. Zhang, G. R. Fleming, and K. B. Whaley, Single-photon absorption and emission from a natur al photosynthetic complex, Nature 619, 300 (2023)

    work page 2023

  48. [48]

    O. Iso, K. Miyajima, and R. Shimizu, Capturing the spect rotem- poral structure of a biphoton wave packet with delay-line-anode single-photon imagers, arXiv:2407.16149 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  49. [49]

    Brixner, J

    T. Brixner, J. Stenger, H. M. V aswani, M. Cho, R. E. Blank en- 10 ship, and G. R. Fleming, Two-dimensional spectroscopy of electronic couplings in photosynthesis, Nature 434, 625 (2005)

    work page 2005

  50. [50]

    P . F. Tekavec, G. A. Lott, and A. H. Marcus, Fluorescence - detected two-dimensional electronic coherence spectroscopy by acousto-optic phase modulation, J. Chem. Phys. 127, 214307 (2007)

    work page 2007

  51. [51]

    G. A. Lott, A. Perdomo-Ortiz, J. K. Utterback, J. R. Wido m, A. Aspuru-Guzik, and A. H. Marcus, Conformation of self- assembled porphyrin dimers in liposome vesicles by phase- modulation 2d fluorescence spectroscopy, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108, 16521 (2011)

    work page 2011

  52. [52]

    Agathangelou, A

    D. Agathangelou, A. Javed, F. Sessa, X. Solinas, M. Jo ffre, and J. P . Ogilvie, Phase-modulated rapid-scanning fluorescenc e- detected two-dimensional electronic spectroscopy, J. Che m. Phys. 155 (2021)

    work page 2021

  53. [53]

    T. E. Keller and M. H. Rubin, Theory of two-photon entang le- ment for spontaneous parametric down-conversion driven by a narrow pump pulse, Phys. Rev. A 56, 1534 (1997)

    work page 1997

  54. [54]

    Ansari, J

    V . Ansari, J. M. Donohue, B. Brecht, and C. Silberhorn, T ai- loring nonlinear processes for quantum optics with pulsed temporal-mode encodings, Optica 5, 534 (2018)

    work page 2018

  55. [55]

    Gatti and E

    A. Gatti and E. Brambilla, Heralding pure single photon s: A comparison between counterpropagating and copropagatin g twin photons, Phys. Rev. A 97, 013838 (2018)

    work page 2018

  56. [56]

    Loudon, The Quantum Theory of Light, 3rd ed

    R. Loudon, The Quantum Theory of Light, 3rd ed. (Oxford Uni- versity Press, Oxford, 2000)

    work page 2000

  57. [57]

    K. E. Dorfman, F. Schlawin, and S. Mukamel, Nonlinear op tical signals and spectroscopy with quantum light, Rev. Mod. Phys . 88, 045008 (2016)

    work page 2016

  58. [58]

    Gelin, A

    M. Gelin, A. Pisliakov, and W. Domcke, Time-and frequen cy- gated spontaneous emission as a tool for studying vibration al dynamics in the excited state, Phys. Rev. A 65, 062507 (2002)

    work page 2002

  59. [59]

    J. Yang, M. F. Gelin, L. Chen, F. ˇSanda, E. Thyrhaug, and J. Hauer, Two-dimensional fluorescence excitation spec - troscopy: A novel technique for monitoring excited-state p ho- tophysics of molecular species with high time and frequency resolution, J. Chem. Phys. 159 (2023)

    work page 2023

  60. [60]

    Enhancing the position resolution of the DLD improves the ability to distinguish closely spaced wavelengths in the pho- ton spectrum, thereby increasing the frequency resolution

    Photons dispersed by the spectrometer arrive at di fferent po- sitions on the photocathode of the DLD based on their wave- lengths. Enhancing the position resolution of the DLD improves the ability to distinguish closely spaced wavelengths in the pho- ton spectrum, thereby increasing the frequency resolution . The position resolution of the DLD is primaril...

    work page

  61. [61]

    K. E. Dorfman and S. Mukamel, Nonlinear spectroscopy wi th time-and frequency-gated photon counting: A superoperator di- agrammatic approach, Phys. Rev. A 86, 013810 (2012)

    work page 2012

  62. [62]

    Mukamel, Principles of Nonlinear Optical Spectroscopy (Oxford University Press, New Y ork, 1995)

    S. Mukamel, Principles of Nonlinear Optical Spectroscopy (Oxford University Press, New Y ork, 1995)

    work page 1995

  63. [63]

    Zhang, T

    W.-M. Zhang, T. Meier, V . Chernyak, and S. Mukamel, Exciton-migration and three-pulse femtosecond optical sp ec- troscopies of photosynthetic antenna complexes, J. Chem. Phys. 108, 7763 (1998)

    work page 1998

  64. [64]

    A. G. Refield, On the theory of relaxation processes, IBM J. Res. Dev. 1, 19 (1957)

    work page 1957

  65. [65]

    Ishizaki and G

    A. Ishizaki and G. R. Fleming, Quantum coherence in phot o- synthetic light harvesting, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 3, 333 (2012)

    work page 2012

  66. [66]

    Kato and A

    A. Kato and A. Ishizaki, Non-markovian quantum-classi cal ratchet for ultrafast long-range electron-hole separatio n in con- densed phases, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 026001 (2018)

    work page 2018

  67. [67]

    Bruschini, H

    C. Bruschini, H. Homulle, I. M. Antolovic, S. Burri, and E. Charbon, Single-photon avalanche diode imagers in bioph o- tonics: review and outlook, Light Sci. Appl. 8, 87 (2019)

    work page 2019

  68. [68]

    Oleksiievets, C

    N. Oleksiievets, C. Mathew, J. C. Thiele, J. I. Gallea, O. Nevskyi, I. Gregor, A. Weber, R. Tsukanov, and J. Enderlein, Single-molecule fluorescence lifetime imaging using wide-field and confocal-laser scanning microscopy: A comparative ana ly- sis, Nano Lett. 22, 6454 (2022)

    work page 2022

  69. [69]

    W. P . Grice and I. A. Walmsley, Spectral information and dis- tinguishability in type-II down-conversion with a broadba nd pump, Phys. Rev. A 56, 1627 (1997)

    work page 1997