Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 7 minor 54 references

Dislocations and plasticity of KTaO$_3$ perovskite modeled with a new interatomic potential

T0 review · 4 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Potassium tantalate deforms plastically because its <110> dislocations split into two partial dislocations separated by a stacking fault, and these glide easily.

desk verdict First atomistic dislocation model for KTaO3 with a new potential; the qualitative dissociation and charge-neutral core story holds up, but the quantitative width validation rests on a scaling correction that is shakier than the authors let on. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.02184 v1 pith:OS257JVL submitted 2025-02-04 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Pierre Hirel , Franck Junior Kakdeu Yewou , Jiawen Zhang , Wenjun Lu , Xufei Fang , Philippe Carrez This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords dislocationsKTaO3perovskiteinteratomicpotentialantiphaseboundaryroom-temperatureductilitymolecularstaticsHAADF-STEM
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to explain why potassium tantalate (KTaO3), a cubic perovskite ceramic that most people expect to be brittle, deforms plastically at room temperature. Using a newly fitted interatomic potential and electron microscopy, the authors argue that the key is dislocation geometry: <110> dislocations split into two collinear partial dislocations, each carrying half the Burgers vector, separated by an antiphase boundary, and these dissociated dislocations glide relatively easily. Edge dislocations preferentially adopt charge-neutral cores, though they remain glissile even when positively charged. If these claims hold, KTaO3's room-temperature ductility is a direct consequence of this dissociation, and the material should stay ductile across a wide range of temperatures and oxygen pressures. The work also provides a validated atomistic model for further simulation of defect engineering in tantalate perovskites.

What carries the argument

The carrying object is a modified rigid-ion interatomic potential built from Pedone's oxide parameters for K–O and O–O, with Ta–O Morse parameters fitted to reproduce the lattice parameter and elastic constants of cubic KTaO3. With this potential the authors compute the generalized stacking-fault energy surface on the (110) plane and find, as in DFT, a metastable antiphase boundary at a half-lattice shift along [110]—the feature that allows dislocation dissociation. The second central piece is the elastic relation $d = \mu b^2/(2\pi \kappa \gamma_{\mathrm{APB}})$, taken from dislocation theory, which links the partial separation $d$ to the APB energy $\gamma_{\mathrm{APB}}$; the authors use it to rescale simulated widths by the factor 1.78 (the ratio of the potential's APB energy to the DFT value) to obtain corrected dissociation distances for comparison with experiment. Finally, the nudged-elastic-band method supplies Peierls barriers, and a Gaussian-smearing charge analysis identifies whether dislocation cores are charged or neutral.

What would settle it

Compute the fully relaxed (110) antiphase boundary energy of KTaO3 with a high-accuracy electronic-structure method, or calculate the dissociation width of an isolated [110] edge dislocation directly without any elastic scaling; if the APB energy comes out well away from 0.28 J/m², or the direct width is far from roughly 60 Å, then the paper's central consistency check fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that in cubic KTaO3, dislocations with Burgers vector <110> dissociate in their {110} glide plane into two collinear partial dislocations, each with Burgers vector 1/2<110>, separated by an antiphase boundary (a stacking fault in which the potassium and tantalum sublattices are shifted by half a lattice translation). The authors show this for both screw and edge characters using their modified rigid-ion interatomic potential, record dissociation widths of about 19.4 Å (screw) and 31.5–34.8 Å (edge) in raw simulations, and then apply elastic theory—assuming inverse proportionality between APB energy and dissociation distance—to correct for the potential's overestimated APB energy, arriving at predicted widths of about 34 Å for screw and 60–61 Å for edge dislocations. A HAADF-STEM image of a deformed sample shows a dipole of edge dislocations with a measured partial separation of about 70 Å, which the authors take as quantitative validation. They further compute Peierls barriers of about 40–45 meV/Å, indicating that these dissociated dislocations glide relatively easily, and they show that charge-neutral edge cores are about 22.7 eV per dipole lower in energy than charged cores. Together these results place KTaO3 alongside SrTiO3 and KNbO3 as a room-temperature ductile perovskite, but stiffer, with a higher critical resolved shear stress.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the interatomic potential's only significant error is its antiphase boundary energy, so that multiplying simulated dissociation widths by the ratio of that energy to the DFT value (factor 1.78) yields correct widths; if core energies, elastic interactions, or partial structures also differ, the claimed quantitative agreement with the measured 70 Å width collapses.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the dissociation picture is right, room-temperature ductility in KTaO3 is carried by <110>{110} dislocations that split into partials, so plastic deformation can be understood and predicted with standard dislocation theory.
  • Because edge dislocations prefer charge-neutral cores but remain glissile when positively charged (oxygen deficient), KTaO3 should remain ductile over a wide range of oxygen partial pressures and temperatures.
  • The larger stiffness and higher Peierls barriers compared with SrTiO3 mean KTaO3 should be measurably more resistant to plastic flow, matching the higher critical resolved shear stress reported in experiments.
  • The new potential enables atomistic studies of dislocation interactions, oxygen diffusion along dislocation cores, and glide-to-climb transitions that are beyond current ab initio reach.
  • If the large dissociation width (~61 Å) prevents compaction of edge segments, KTaO3 may not show the ductile-to-brittle transition seen in SrTiO3 near 1000 K, a hypothesis the authors explicitly flag for future high-temperature experiments.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same charge-neutrality argument likely extends to <100> edge dislocations in KTaO3 and KNbO3, but since {100} planes in these materials carry formal charges, such dislocations would be intrinsically charged and would need charge compensation, which could influence electronic and ionic conduction at grain boundaries—an issue the paper raises but does not simulate.
  • The inverse-proportionality assumption could be stress-tested by computing dissociation widths with the Sepliarsky shell-model potential (which has a different APB energy) and checking whether the scaled widths agree with the rigid-ion results; consistency across potentials would strengthen the elastic-correction scheme.
  • If positively charged, oxygen-deficient edge dislocations stay glissile, then under reducing conditions dislocations may act as mobile charged defects, giving a possible mechanism for electrically or optically driven dislocation motion that could be probed in situ.
  • The new potential's transferability to other tantalate perovskites (for example NaTaO3 or LiTaO3) could be checked by reproducing their elastic constants and stacking-fault energies, which would extend the dissociation-based plasticity picture to a broader family.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 7 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces a rigid-ion interatomic potential for cubic KTaO3, fitted to the lattice parameter and elastic constants, and uses it in molecular statics to study ⟨110⟩{110} dislocations. It reports that both screw and edge dislocations dissociate into two collinear 1/2⟨110⟩ partials separated by an antiphase boundary, that charge-neutral edge cores are energetically preferred over charged ones, and that the dislocations are glissile with Peierls energies of 40–45 meV/Å. The simulations are complemented by DFT generalized-stacking-fault calculations and by HAADF-STEM observations of a dissociated edge dislocation. The main quantitative validation is a comparison between corrected simulated dissociation widths (about 34 Å for screw and 60–61 Å for edge) and an experimental width of about 70 Å, where the correction multiplies raw widths by the ratio of the potential's and DFT's fully relaxed APB energies, a factor of 1.78.

Significance. The work is potentially significant because it provides a simple, computationally efficient interatomic potential for KTaO3, a material for which no dedicated dislocation potential existed, and because it extends the picture of room-temperature plasticity in cubic perovskites. The qualitative conclusions—dissociation into 1/2⟨110⟩ partials, charge neutrality of edge cores, and relatively easy glide—are supported by two independent routes (atomistic simulation and STEM imaging) and by qualitative comparison with SrTiO3 and KNbO3. The potential is fitted only to bulk properties, so the dislocation core structures and the dissociation tendency are emergent outputs rather than fitting artifacts. However, the quantitative width agreement is not as robust as presented because the rescaling procedure and the single experimental measurement carry unquantified uncertainties.

major comments (4)
  1. [II, III.A, IV.B] The corrected dissociation widths rely on the assumption of exact inverse proportionality between dissociation distance and the fully relaxed APB energy (γAPB = μb²/(2πκd) in Section II, factor 1.78 applied in Sections III.A and IV.B). The disregistry in Fig. 2b shows partial cores about 5 Å wide whose derivatives overlap, so for the screw dislocation with raw d = 19.4 Å the effective separation between singular partials is only about 9–10 Å; finite-core corrections to the singular elastic formula are first-order, not negligible. In addition, the factor 1.78 uses fully relaxed APB energies (0.50 vs 0.28 J/m²), whereas the fault inside a dissociated dislocation is constrained by the surrounding elastic field; using the constrained APB energies changes the ratio to about 2.0. Please either benchmark the APB energy in the actual dissociated configuration, apply a finite-core elastic model, or report the raw widths with a clear caveat.
  2. [IV.B and Table III] The reported corrected edge width is internally inconsistent. Section IV.B states the charge-neutral dislocation has a raw dissociation distance of 31.5 Å, which multiplied by 1.78 gives 56 Å, yet the text and Table III report w⊥ = 60–61 Å. The latter numbers instead follow from the charged dislocation widths (33.9 and 34.8 Å). Since the charge-neutral dislocation is the physically favored configuration, please specify which width is used for the experimental comparison and correct the discrepancy.
  3. [IV.C] The HAADF-STEM validation is based on a single measurement of a separation of about 70 Å with no error bar and no discussion of projection effects, image-plane orientation, or foil thickness. Given the sensitivity of the corrected widths to the rescaling assumption discussed in Major Comment 1, the statement that the observation is "fully consistent" with the predicted 60 Å overstates the quantitative agreement. Please provide the raw simulated widths alongside the rescaled values, report several measured widths or at least an uncertainty estimate, and discuss the two-dimensional projection of a possibly inclined dislocation.
  4. [III.C] The description of the screw Peierls barrier is not fully consistent. The text says that "the four final energy paths are represented in Fig. 4," but Fig. 4 plots relative energy versus dissociation distance, not a reaction coordinate along the dislocation glide path. Since the claim that screw dislocations glide relatively easily rests on this barrier, please clarify the NEB protocol, show the actual energy versus reaction-coordinate curves, and specify how the 45 meV/Å value is extracted from them.
minor comments (7)
  1. [I.E] The experimental section mentions "undoped KTiO3 (001) single crystals"; this should read KTaO3.
  2. [III.C] "an Peierls energy" should be "a Peierls energy."
  3. [V.B] "looses its ductility" should be "loses its ductility."
  4. [Fig. 7(d)] The simulated image is stated to have a smaller dissociation width than experiment without giving the raw value; adding the raw width or a quantitative scale bar would help the comparison.
  5. [Table III] For consistency with the preferred charge-neutral core, the KTaO3 edge width listed as 61 Å should be labeled with its configurational origin (charged vs neutral) or replaced by the neutral value.
  6. [Eq. (1) and Table I] The units of the Morse parameters and of Cij are given only in Table I; define all symbols in the text or in a notation section.
  7. [References] Reference [21] lists the first author as "Issam Khayr," but the text cites "Khayr"; please check and standardize the author listing.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: the potential is fitted to bulk properties, the dissociation is an emergent simulation output, and the 1.78 APB rescaling uses an external DFT benchmark.

full rationale

The paper's central results are emergent outputs of a newly fitted interatomic potential. The Ta-O Morse parameters are fitted only to the lattice parameter and elastic constants (Table II, Section I.A); dislocation dissociation, core structures, Peierls barriers, and the preference for charge-neutral edge dislocations are all obtained by subsequent relaxation and energy minimization, not imposed by the fitting target. The only post-processing of dislocation data is the rescaling of simulated dissociation widths by a factor of 1.78, introduced in Section II because the potential's fully relaxed APB energy (0.50 J/m^2) overestimates the DFT/GGA value (0.28 J/m^2), using the standard elastic proportionality d = mu*b^2/(2*pi*kappa*gamma_APB) (Section II, applied in III.A and IV.B). The DFT APB energy is an external first-principles calculation performed for this paper, not a parameter extracted from the experimental dissociation width, and the raw simulated widths (19.4 A screw, 31.5 A neutral edge) are reported alongside the corrected values, so this is a transparent benchmark correction rather than a fitted input renamed as a prediction. Self-citations to the authors' prior work (e.g., refs. [23], [25], [48]) supply comparative SrTiO3 data and methodological tools, but the KTaO3 conclusions are supported by new simulations with the new potential, including the direct 22.7 eV energy difference favoring charge-neutral edge dislocations (Section IV.B). No uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from self-citations to force the results. The skeptical objection that the 1.78 rescaling may not capture all differences between potential and DFT (finite core widths, constrained fault relaxation, partial core energies) is a validity/robustness concern, not evidence that any prediction reduces by construction to its inputs. Accordingly, no specific circular step can be identified, and the appropriate finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central quantitative claims rest on the three fitted Ta-O Morse parameters, the chosen Ta charge and C coefficient, and a post-hoc scaling by the potential-to-DFT APB energy ratio. The scaling is the most fragile element; no new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • Ta-O Morse D_ij = 0.008508 eV
    Fitted using GULP to reproduce lattice constant and elastic constants of KTaO3 (Table I).
  • Ta-O Morse a_ij = 3.006309 Å^-2
    Fitted with GULP to target a0 and C11-C44.
  • Ta-O Morse r0 = 2.719528 Å
    Fitted with GULP; the three Ta-O Morse parameters are the core unknowns of the new potential.
  • Ta charge q_Ta = 3 e
    Set by hand to 5 times q_K to ensure charge neutrality with Pedone charges; not fitted.
  • C_Ta-O repulsive coefficient = 1 eV·Å^12
    Set equal to 1 by hand, following the value for similar B-site ions in perovskites.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Rigid-ion potential with partial charges (qK=0.6e, qTa=3e, qO=-1.2e) accurately describes dislocation core energetics in KTaO3 despite neglecting electronic polarization.
    Invoked in Methods and throughout the paper; validated only against bulk elastic constants and stacking-fault energies, not against charged-defect formation energies.
  • ad hoc to paper The inverse elastic relation d = mu*b^2/(2*pi*kappa*gamma_APB) between dissociation width and APB energy holds, and the correction factor gamma_RIP/gamma_DFT = 1.78 applies uniformly to screw and edge dislocations.
    Used in Sections II, IIIA and IVB to rescale simulated widths (19.4 Angstrom to 34 Angstrom; 31.5 Angstrom to 60 Angstrom) and claim consistency with the STEM measurement of 70 Angstrom.
  • domain assumption The DFT-PBE reference value gamma_APB = 0.28 J/m2 is accurate enough to set the scaling factor.
    The correction factor is computed from a single DFT calculation with the GGA functional; other functionals would shift the factor and the resulting widths.
  • standard math NEB with 9 to 16 replicas and a spring constant of 1 eV/Angstrom finds the minimum energy path for dislocation glide.
    Described in Section IC; standard technique for transition path sampling.
  • domain assumption The dipole construction and oxygen half-column transfer yield representative equilibrium core structures for edge dislocations.
    Described in Sections IVA and IVB; the neutral configuration is one specific charge compensation path and is not proven to be the global minimum.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Dislocations and plasticity of KTaO$_3$ perovskite modeled with a new interatomic potential." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OS257JVL

@misc{pith2026250202184,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Dislocations and plasticity of KTaO$_3$ perovskite modeled with a new interatomic potential},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OS257JVL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.02184}
}
read the original abstract

Potassium tantalate KTaO3 is a cubic, paraelectric perovskite ceramic that exhibits surprising ductility at room temperature as most recently reported. Much like strontium titanate (SrTiO3), plastic deformation is accommodated by dislocations gliding in {110} planes. In this work we propose a new interatomic potential for KTaO3, and apply it to model dislocations with <110> Burgers vector. We demonstrate that dislocations dissociate, and finely characterize their core structure and Peierls potential. Dislocations of edge character can carry a positive or negative electric charge, but we show that charge-neutral configurations are energetically more favorable. We also perform high-resolution electron microscopy to validate our simulation methodology. Comparing our results with other ductile perovskites, we confirm KTaO3 to be ductile, but stiffer than SrTiO3.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.02184 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Energy density [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) Atomic core structure of the screw dislocation with Burgers vector [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Evolution of dissociation width [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Relative energy of a screw [110] dislocation as function of the dissociation distance [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Construction of a dipole of charged [110] edge dislocations (same color code as Fig. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Method for neutralizing the charge of [110] edge dislocations. (a) The system is duplicated [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. (a) HAADF-STEM image of a dipole of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Minimum energy path for the motion of a charge-neutral and dissociated [110] edge [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    L. Zhao, Q. Liu, J. Gao, S. Zhang, J. F. Li, Lead-free antiferroelectric silver niobate tantalate with high energy storage performance, Advanced Materials 29 (8 2017). doi:10.1002/adma. 201701824

    doi:10.1002/adma 2017

  2. [2]

    J. Yin, Y. Zhang, X. Lv, J. Wu, Ultrahigh energy-storage potential under low electric field in bismuth sodium titanate-based perovskite ferroelectrics, Journal of Materials Chemistry A 6 (2018) 9823–9832. doi:10.1039/c8ta00474a

    work page doi:10.1039/c8ta00474a 2018

  3. [3]

    Edalati, K

    K. Edalati, K. Fujiwara, S. Takechi, Q. Wang, M. Arita, M. Watanabe, X. Sauvage, T. Ishi- hara, Z. Horita, Improved photocatalytic hydrogen evolution on tantalate perovskites CsTaO3 and LiTaO3 by strain-induced vacancies, ACS Applied Energy Materials 3 (2020) 1710–1718. doi:10.1021/acsaem.9b02197

    work page doi:10.1021/acsaem.9b02197 2020

  4. [4]

    C. C. Hu, C. C. Tsai, H. Teng, Structure characterization and tuning of perovskite-like NaTaO3 for applications in photoluminescence and photocatalysis, Journal of the American Ceramic Society 92 (2009) 460–466. doi:10.1111/j.1551-2916.2008.02869.x

    arXiv 2009

  5. [5]

    H. N. Sumedha, M. Shashank, F. A. Alharthi, M. S. Santosh, B. M. Praveen, G. Nagaraju, Synthesis of novel pseudo-capacitive perovskite nanostructured flowerlike KTaO 3 for lithium ion storage, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 46 (2021) 28214–28220. doi:10.1016/ j.ijhydene.2021.06.045

    work page 2021

  6. [6]

    H. N. Sumedha, M. Shashank, S. R. Teixeira, B. M. Praveen, G. Nagaraju, Novel 3d-flower shaped KTaO3 perovskite for highly efficient photocatalytic and H 2 generation ability, Scien- tific Reports 12 (2022) 10776. doi:10.1038/s41598-022-14590-3

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-022-14590-3 2022

  7. [7]

    M. I. Hussain, R. M. Khalil, F. Hussain, A. M. Rana, Dft-based insight into the magnetic and thermoelectric characteristics of XTaO 3 (X = Rb, Fr) ternary perovskite oxides for optoelectronic applications, International Journal of Energy Research 45 (2021) 2753–2765. doi:10.1002/er.5968

    work page doi:10.1002/er.5968 2021

  8. [8]

    Gupta, H

    A. Gupta, H. Silotia, A. Kumari, M. Dumen, S. Goyal, R. Tomar, N. Wadehra, P. Ayyub, S. Chakraverty, KTaO3—the new kid on the spintronics block, Advanced Materials 34 (2022) 2106481. doi:10.1002/adma.202106481. 22

    work page doi:10.1002/adma.202106481 2022

Show all 54 references
  1. [9]

    M. K. Hussain, R. Paudel, B. J. kahdum, S. Syrotyuk, Optoelectronic and structural prop- erties of bulk cubic perovskite RbTaO 3 and surface (001) for optoelectronic and spintronics applications, Materials Chemistry and Physics 327 (11 2024). doi:10.1016/j.matchemphys. 2024.129778

    2024

  2. [10]

    Patra, P

    R. Patra, P. Dash, P. K. Panda, P. C. Yang, A breakthrough in photocatalytic wastewater treatment: The incredible potential of g-C 3N4/titanate perovskite-based nanocomposites (8 2023). doi:10.3390/nano13152173

    2023 doi

  3. [11]

    H. J. Queisser, E. E. Haller, Defects in semiconductors: Some fatal, some vital, Science 281 (1998) 945–950. doi:10.1126/science.281.5379.945. URL https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.281.5379.945

    1998 doi

  4. [12]

    Nakamura, K

    A. Nakamura, K. Matsunaga, J. Tohma, T. Yamamoto, Y. Ikuhara, Conducting nanowires in insulating ceramics (2003). doi:10.1038/nmat920

    2003 doi

  5. [13]

    P. Gao, S. Yang, R. Ishikawa, N. Li, B. Feng, A. Kumamoto, N. Shibata, P. Yu, Y. Ikuhara, Atomic-scale measurement of flexoelectric polarization at SrTiO 3 dislocations, Physical Re- view Letters 120 (6 2018). doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.267601

    2018 doi

  6. [14]

    M. D. Armstrong, K. W. Lan, Y. Guo, N. H. Perry, Dislocation-mediated conductivity in oxides: Progress, challenges, and opportunities (6 2021). doi:10.1021/acsnano.1c01557

    2021 doi

  7. [15]

    Fang, Mechanical tailoring of dislocations in ceramics at room temperature: A perspective, Journal of the American Ceramic Society 107 (2024) 1425–1447

    X. Fang, Mechanical tailoring of dislocations in ceramics at room temperature: A perspective, Journal of the American Ceramic Society 107 (2024) 1425–1447. doi:10.1111/jace.19362

    2024 doi

  8. [16]

    Brunner, S

    D. Brunner, S. Taeri-baghbadrani, W. Sigle, M. Ru, M. R¨ uhle, Surprising results of a study on the plasticity in strontium titanate, Journal of the American Ceramic Society 84 (2001) 1161–1163. doi:10.1111/j.1151-2916.2001.tb00805.x

    2001

  9. [17]

    Sigle, C

    W. Sigle, C. Sarbu, D. Brunner, M. R¨ uhle, Dislocations in plastically deformed SrTiO 3, Philosophical Magazine 86 (2006) 4809–4821. doi:10.1080/14786430600672695

    2006 doi

  10. [18]

    K. Szot, W. Speier, G. Bihlmayer, R. Waser, Switching the electrical resistance of individual dislocations in single-crystalline SrTiO 3, Nature Materials 5 (2006) 312–320. doi:10.1038/ nmat1614

    2006

  11. [19]

    Rodenb¨ ucher, G

    C. Rodenb¨ ucher, G. Bihlmayer, C. Korte, K. Szot, Gliding of conducting dislocations in SrTiO3 at room temperature: Why oxygen vacancies are strongly bound to the cores of dislocations, APL Materials 11 (2 2023). doi:10.1063/5.0126378. 23

    2023 doi

  12. [20]

    Hirel, A

    P. Hirel, A. F. Mark, M. Castillo-Rodriguez, W. Sigle, M. Mrovec, C. Els¨ asser, Theoretical and experimental study of the core structure and mobility of dislocations and their relation to ferroelectric polarization in perovskite KnbO 3, Phys. Rev. B 92 (2015) 214101. doi: 10....

    2015 doi

  13. [21]

    Issam Khayr, Sajna Hameed, Jakov Budi´ c, Xing He, Richard Spieker, Ana Najev, Zinan Zhao, Li Yue, Matthew Krogstad, Structural properties of plastically deformed SrTiO 3 and KTaO3, Phys. Rev. Materials 8 (2024) 124404. doi:10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.8.124404

    2024 doi

  14. [22]

    X. Fang, J. Zhang, A. Frisch, O. Preuß, C. Okafor, M. Setvin, W. Lu, Room-temperature bulk plasticity and tunable dislocation densities in KTaO 3, Journal of the American Ceramic Society (7 2024). doi:10.1111/jace.20040

    2024 doi

  15. [23]

    On one hand, a property that the three materials have in common is their polar {110} planes, that can be terminated with ABO 2 (hence a charge +2) or oxygen ions ( −2)

    or Pedone [25] potentials, and KNO was modeled with Sepliarsky SMP [20]), however we attempt to highlight the main trends. On one hand, a property that the three materials have in common is their polar {110} planes, that can be terminated with ABO 2 (hence a charge +2) or oxyg...

  16. [24]

    Hirel, M

    P. Hirel, M. Mrovec, C. Els¨ asser, Atomistic study of ⟨110⟩ dislocations in strontium titanate, Acta Mater. 60 (2012) 329–338. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2011.09.049

    2012 doi

  17. [25]

    Marrocchelli, L

    D. Marrocchelli, L. Sun, B. Yildiz, Dislocations in SrTiO 3: Easy to reduce but not so fast for oxygen transport, Journal of the American Chemical Society 137 (2015) 4735–4748. doi: 10.1021/ja513176u

    2015 doi

  18. [26]

    Hirel, P

    P. Hirel, P. Cordier, P. Carrez, ⟨110⟩{¯110} edge dislocations in strontium titanate: Charged vs neutral, glide vs climb, Acta Materialia 285 (2025) 120636. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2024. 120636

    2025 doi

  19. [27]

    S. J. Plimpton, Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics, J. Comp. Phys. 117 (1995) 1–19. URL http://lammps.sandia.gov

    1995

  20. [28]

    Pedone, G

    A. Pedone, G. Malavasi, M. C. Menziani, A. N. Cormack, U. Segre, A new self-consistent empirical interatomic potential model for oxides, silicates, and silicas-based glasses, Journal of Physical Chemistry B 110 (2006) 11780–11795. doi:10.1021/jp0611018

    2006 doi

  21. [29]

    J. D. Gale, Gulp: A computer program for the symmetry-adapted simulation of solids, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 93 (1997) 629–637. doi:10.1039/A606455H

    1997 doi

  22. [30]

    Y. Q. Xu, S. Y. Wu, L. J. Zhang, L. N. Wu, C. C. Ding, First-principles study of structural, electronic, elastic, and optical properties of cubic KNbO 3 and KTaO3 crystals, Physica Status Solidi (B) Basic Research 254 (2017) 5. doi:10.1002/pssb.201600620

    2017 doi

  23. [31]

    Sepliarsky, A

    M. Sepliarsky, A. Asthagiri, S. R. Phillpot, M. G. Stachiotti, R. L. Migoni, Atomic-level simulation of ferroelectricity in oxide materials, Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials 24 Science 9 (2005) 107–113. doi:10.1016/j.cossms.2006.05.002

    2005 doi

  24. [32]

    J. P. Hirth, J. Lothe, Theory of dislocations, 2nd edition, McGraw-Hill Publ. Co., New York, 1982

    1982

  25. [33]

    Hirel, Atomsk: a tool for converting and manipulating atomic data files, Comput

    P. Hirel, Atomsk: a tool for converting and manipulating atomic data files, Comput. Phys. Comm. 197 (2015) 212-219. doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2015.07.012

    2015 doi

  26. [34]

    Momma, F

    K. Momma, F. Izumi, Vesta 3 for three-dimensional visualization of crystal, volumetric and morphology data, Journal of Applied Crystallography 44 (2011) 1272–1276. doi:10.1107/ S0021889811038970. URL http://scripts.iucr.org/cgi-bin/paper?S0021889811038970

    2011

  27. [35]

    Stukowski, K

    A. Stukowski, K. Albe, Dislocation detection algorithm for atomistic simulations, Modelling Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 18 (2010) 25016

    2010

  28. [36]

    C. L. Kelchner, S. J. Plimpton, J. C. Hamilton, No title, Phys. Rev. B 58 (1998) 11085

    1998

  29. [37]

    J` onsson, G

    H. J` onsson, G. Mills, K. W. Jacobsen, Nudged elastic band method for finding minimum energy paths of transitions, in: Classical and Quantum Dynamics in Condensed Phase Simu- lations, World Scientific, 1998, pp. 385–404. doi:10.1142/9789812839664_0016

    1998 doi

  30. [38]

    Henkelman, H

    G. Henkelman, H. J´ onsson, Improved tangent estimate in the nudged elastic band method for finding minimum energy paths and saddle points, Journal of Chemical Physics 113 (2000) 9978–9985. doi:10.1063/1.1323224

    2000 doi

  31. [39]

    M. J. Weber, Handbook of Optical Materials, 2018. doi:10.1201/9781315219615

    2018 doi

  32. [40]

    Shigemi, T

    A. Shigemi, T. Koyama, T. Wada, First-principles studies of various crystallographic phases and neutral atomic vacancies in KNbO 3 and KTaO3, in: Physica Status Solidi (C) Current Topics in Solid State Physics, Vol. 3, 2006, pp. 2862–2866. doi:10.1002/pssc.200669541

    2006 doi

  33. [41]

    L. Hu, D. Sun, H. Zhang, J. Luo, C. Quan, Z. Han, K. Dong, Y. Chen, M. Cheng, Growth, defects, mechanical, and optical properties of transparent KTaO 3 single crys- tal, Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics 33 (2022) 13051–13063. doi: 10.1007/s10854-022-08246-1

    2022 doi

  34. [42]

    A. R. Benrekia, N. Benkhettou, A. Nassour, M. Driz, M. Sahnoun, S. Leb` egue, Structural, electronic and optical properties of cubic SrTiO 3 and KTaO3: Ab initio and GW calculations, Physica B: Condensed Matter 407 (2012) 2632–2636. doi:10.1016/j.physb.2012.04.013

    2012 doi

  35. [43]

    Bouafia, S

    H. Bouafia, S. Hiadsi, B. Abidri, A. Akriche, L. Ghalouci, B. Sahli, Structural, elastic, elec- tronic and thermodynamic properties of KTaO 3 and NaTaO3: Ab initio investigations, Com- 25 putational Materials Science 75 (2013) 1–8. doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2013.03.030

    2013 doi

  36. [44]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthm¨ uller, Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set, Phys. Rev. B 54 (1996) 11169–11186. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB. 54.11169

    1996 doi

  37. [45]

    Kresse and D

    G. Kresse and D. Joubert, From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B 59 (1999) 1758–1775. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758

    1999 doi

  38. [46]

    Bl¨ ochl, Projector augmented-wave method, Phys

    P.E. Bl¨ ochl, Projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B 50 (1994) 17953–17979. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953

    1994 doi

  39. [47]

    Perdew, Kieron Burke, and Matthias Ernzerhof, Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple, Phys

    John P. Perdew, Kieron Burke, and Matthias Ernzerhof, Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (1996) 3865–3868. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865

    1996 doi

  40. [48]

    Monkhorst and James D

    Hendrik J. Monkhorst and James D. Pack, Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations, Phys. Rev. B 13 (1976) 5188–5192. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.13.5188

    1976 doi

  41. [49]

    Hirel, P

    P. Hirel, P. Marton, M. Mrovec, C. Els¨ asser, Theoretical investigation of {110} generalized stacking faults and their relation to dislocation behavior in perovskite oxides, Acta Materialia 58 (2010) 6072–6079. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2010.07.025

    2010 doi

  42. [50]

    A. J. Klomp, L. Porz, K. Albe, The nature and motion of deformation-induced dislocations in SrTiO3: Insights from atomistic simulations, Acta Materialia 242 (2023). doi:10.1016/j. actamat.2022.118404

    2023

  43. [51]

    Castillo-Rodr ´ ıguez, W

    M. Castillo-Rodr ´ ıguez, W. Sigle, Dislocation dissociation and stacking-fault energy calculation in strontium titanate, Scripta Materialia 62 (2010) 270–273. doi:10.1016/j.scriptamat. 2009.11.016

    2010 doi

  44. [52]

    J. Xi, H. Xu, Y. Zhang, W. J. Weber, Strain effects on oxygen vacancy energetics in KTaO 3, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 19 (2017) 6264–6273. doi:10.1039/c6cp08315c

    2017 doi

  45. [53]

    Javaid, K

    F. Javaid, K. E. Johanns, E. A. Patterson, K. Durst, Temperature dependence of indentation size effect, dislocation pile-ups, and lattice friction in (001) strontium titanate, Journal of the American Ceramic Society 101 (2018) 356–364. doi:10.1111/jace.15182

    2018 doi

  46. [54]

    Hirel, P

    P. Hirel, P. Carrez, P. Cordier, From glissile to sessile: Effect of temperature on (110) dis- locations in perovskite materials, Scripta Materialia 120 (2016) 67–70. doi:10.1016/j. scriptamat.2016.04.001. 26

    2016 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.