Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 42 references

Stochastic quantization of $\lambda \phi_2^4$- theory in 2-d Moyal space

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The 2-dimensional Moyal λφ⁴ model is constructed as the invariant measure of a renormalized stochastic quantization equation for every nonnegative coupling λ.

desk verdict A serious construction of the 2-d Moyal λφ⁴ measure for all λ ≥ 0, but the central finiteness check in Appendix F is not fully shown and must be visible before certifying. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.02355 v2 pith:CSH6CWQU submitted 2025-02-04 math-ph math.MPmath.PR

Chunqiu Song , Hendrik Weber , Raimar Wulkenhaar This is my paper · ORCID
classification math-phmath.MPmath.PR MSC 60H1535B4581T0881T75
keywords stochasticquantizationMoyalspacenon-commutativequantumfieldtheoryWickrenormalizationinvariantmeasureglobalwell-posednessmatrixbasislambdaphi^4model
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that the Euclidean $\lambda\phi^4$ field theory on two-dimensional Moyal space can be constructed non-perturbatively for every nonnegative coupling $\lambda$, by realizing it as the equilibrium measure of a renormalized stochastic quantization equation. The authors prove local well-posedness of the renormalized remainder equation, extend solutions to all times through a second-order expansion around the Gaussian field and an a priori estimate, and then obtain an invariant probability measure on $H^{-1/2-\varepsilon}$ as a weak limit of time-averaged laws. If correct, this gives the first SPDE-based construction of the Moyal $\lambda\phi^4_2$ measure for arbitrary $\lambda\geq 0$, a step toward the conjectured four-dimensional construction.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by the expansion $\phi = z + v$, then $v = y + w$, where $z$ is the stationary Gaussian process of the linearized equation and $y$ the stationary response to the renormalized cubic $:z^3:$. The fixed point map solves the remainder equation in the weighted space $K^\beta_T$, and the a priori estimate for the second remainder $w$ produces the dissipation $\partial_t\|w\|^2_{H^0}+\|w\|^2_{H^{1/2}}+2\pi\theta\lambda\|w^2\|^2_{H^0}\le C F[y,z]$. The renormalized Wick products $:z^2:$ and $:z^3:$ subtract only traces of adjacent matrix products, and the non-planar $zvz$ contribution is controlled through the operator norm of $w\mapsto zwz$, estimated by a graph-reduction census of its 105 Wick contractions.

What would settle it

Evaluate the 34 isomorphism classes of contractions in Appendix F with explicit code; if any class diverges for $\alpha=\tfrac12-\varepsilon$ and $\beta=-\varepsilon-\varepsilon'$, Lemma 4.5 is false and the local well-posedness theorem collapses.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the renormalized stochastic quantization equation on the matrix basis, with the cubic drift written in Wick products that subtract only contractions of adjacent matrix factors, has global solutions and an invariant probability measure. The invariant measure is obtained as a weak limit of the time averages $\frac{1}{t_k}\int_0^{t_k}\mu_s\,ds$ in the space of probability measures on $H^{-1/2-\varepsilon}$. Combined with global well-posedness, the paper presents this invariant measure as the construction of the Moyal $\lambda\phi^4_2$ measure for any $\lambda\ge 0$. The argument decomposes the field as $\phi=z+v$, with $z$ the stationary Gaussian solution of the linearized equation, and then expands once more, $v=y+w$, where $y$ solves the equation driven by $:z^3:$, so that the second remainder $w$ satisfies a dissipative a priori estimate.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is Lemma 4.5: the 105 Wick-contraction sums that bound the random operator $w\mapsto zwz$ are finite at the critical regularities $\alpha=\tfrac12-\varepsilon$, $\beta=-\varepsilon-\varepsilon'$; the paper groups the terms into isomorphism classes and states the reductions rather than displaying every contraction.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For every $\lambda\ge 0$, the stochastic quantization dynamics has global solutions almost surely and at least one invariant measure on $H^{-1/2-\varepsilon}$.
  • The Euclidean measure of the Moyal $\lambda\phi^4_2$ model is obtained without relying on Borel summability assumptions on $\lambda$.
  • The two-step expansion gives an explicit exponential-in-time bound on the remainder, so the constructed dynamics inherits a form of damping controlled by the Gaussian objects $z$ and $:z^2:$.
  • Renormalization in the matrix base reduces to subtracting adjacent Wick contractions, making the non-planar sector manageable through a finite 105-term graphical check.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper does not prove uniqueness of the invariant measure; if uniqueness held, the time-averaged construction would identify the Moyal $\lambda\phi^4_2$ measure unambiguously and would upgrade to a mixing statement.
  • The 105-term verification is asserted through isomorphism classes rather than displayed term-by-term, so an independent computer-algebra audit of the 34 classes is a direct way to make the finiteness claim checkable.
  • The authors' stated route to four dimensions is to replace the Gaussian $z$ by the planar-sector process with effective fractional dimension; the $d=2$ bounds on the operators $N_1,\dots,N_7$ are the parts expected to transfer.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper studies the stochastic quantization equation for the λφ⁴ model on two-dimensional Moyal space, written in the matrix basis. Using the Da Prato–Debussche trick, the field is decomposed into a stationary Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process z plus a remainder v, and the remainder equation is solved locally in a weighted matrix Hilbert space K_T^{1/2−ε}. A second-order expansion (v = y + w, with y solving the :z³:-driven linear equation) yields an a priori estimate for w, from which global well-posedness is derived. A Krylov–Bogoliubov argument then produces an invariant probability measure on H^{−1/2−ε}, which the authors identify as the Moyal λφ⁴₂ measure for every λ ≥ 0. The main technical novelty is the treatment of the non-planar term v ↦ z v z as a random linear operator, whose estimates require checking 105 Wick contractions, organized into 34 isomorphism classes in Appendix F.

Significance. If fully correct, the paper would provide the first SPDE-based construction of the Moyal λφ⁴₂ measure for all non-negative couplings, complementing the Borel-summability construction by Wang [41] and giving a concrete step toward the four-dimensional Grosse–Wulkenhaar model. The architecture follows the well-tested Da Prato–Debussche / Mourrat–Weber / Tsatsoulis–Weber framework, and the second-order expansion is a nontrivial adaptation to the matrix setting. The paper is also careful in defining the relevant Wick products and in exhibiting all 105 contractions. The central obstruction is that the finiteness of the 105-diagram sum — which is load-bearing for local well-posedness, the a priori estimate, and hence the invariant measure — is asserted rather than demonstrated in the printed text.

major comments (3)
  1. [Lemma 4.5 and Appendix F] The finiteness assertion on which local well-posedness rests is not actually demonstrated. Lemma 4.5 bounds E[Σ ...] and refers to Appendix F for verification. Appendix F lists all 105 pairings, groups them into 34 isomorphism classes, states five reduction rules, and displays a diagram for each class; however, for only one class (item 30) is any reduction shown in words, and the worked example in §4 covers a single representative. The estimate enters Lemma 5.4, Theorem 5.6, the a priori estimate through the ∥N₅∥^{4/(κ₁+κ₂)} term in Eq. (6.1), and ultimately Theorem 7.1. Since one divergent class would invalidate the main construction, the authors should display the full reduction for all 34 classes, or provide a machine-checkable supplement that a referee can verify.
  2. [Lemma 4.5 and Appendix F, exponent notation] The notation in Lemma 4.5 is inconsistent with the hypotheses of the graph rules. Lemma 4.5 states α = 1/2 − ε and β = 0 − ε − ε′, so β < 0. The rules in Appendix F, however, are stated with hypotheses such as “α, β ∈ (0,1) and α + β − 1 > 0”, which are not satisfied by these values. The surrounding explanations suggest that the rule parameters are actually the positive edge weights 2α and −2β appearing on red and green edges, but this identification is never made explicit. As printed, a reader cannot check that Rules 1–5 apply to the graphs arising from the stated exponents. This should be clarified by giving the rule parameters and the Sobolev exponents separate names.
  3. [Theorem 7.1] The Krylov–Bogoliubov step is incomplete. The proof establishes tightness of the Cesàro averages (1/t)∫₀ᵗ μ_s ds, but it does not state or prove the Markov property or the Feller property for the solution semigroup on H^{−1/2−ε}. The invocation of Corollary 3.1.2 of [7] requires a Feller Markov semigroup; without such a verification, tightness alone only gives a weak limit point, not an invariant measure for the dynamics. Please add a proof (or precise citation with verified hypotheses) of the required semigroup continuity.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Appendix E, definition of :z³:] Two different definitions of the cutoff Wick cube are used: (E.1) includes the subtraction of E[z_{mk} z_{ln}] z_{kl}, while (E.2), which is the definition used in the equation, omits this term because it has better regularity. The convergence proof is carried out for (E.1), and the text asserts that the difference does not change the regularity. This equivalence should be stated as a lemma with a proof, rather than left as a parenthetical remark.
  2. [Theorem 7.1 proof] The tightness estimate is written for the norm H^{−1/2−ε/2}, while the statement of the theorem is for H^{−1/2−ε}; the compact embedding between these spaces is used but not explicitly identified at that point.
  3. [Remark 5.5] Remark 5.5 handwaves the time-regularity of the random operator N₅(t), saying that “one can easily check and convince oneself” that the estimates do not change. If this remark is not needed for the fixed-point argument, it should be removed or shortened; if it is needed, the missing statement should be made precise.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the invariant measure is constructed from the SPDE dynamics via Krylov–Bogoliubov, not assumed as an input.

full rationale

The paper's central claim—existence of an invariant measure for the renormalized stochastic quantization equation and hence a construction of the Moyal λφ4₂ measure—is obtained by solving the Da Prato–Debussche remainder equation (Theorems 5.6 and 6.6) and then applying Krylov–Bogoliubov tightness (Theorem 7.1). The Gaussian process z and the Wick products :z²: and :z³: are constructed from the free OU dynamics in Appendix E; they are not set equal to the target measure. The target Gibbs measure is never assumed; it is only the formal starting point motivating the SPDE. The RG fixed-point choice Ω=1 is an input/model choice cited from [10] and [9], but it does not define the limiting measure and is not used to force the conclusions. The remaining citations to the authors' earlier RG work ([20],[21],[22],[17]) are background and cannot be said to carry the load-bearing argument. The one substantive weakness is not circularity: Lemma 4.5's finiteness verification is delegated to Appendix F, where the 105 Wick contractions are listed and grouped into 34 isomorphism classes, but the reductions are only sketched (with item 30 receiving a one-line explanation). This is an omitted-support concern: the graph-reduction method is plausible and the result is externally checkable, but a reader cannot verify every class from the printed text. Missing detail of this kind affects correctness risk, not the circularity score. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction; no uniqueness theorem from the authors is invoked to forbid alternatives; and the invariant measure is not built by definition from the objects it is said to construct. Accordingly the derivation chain is self-contained in the relevant sense, and the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The derivation rests on standard Gaussian analysis (hypercontractivity), the matrix-basis representation of the Moyal product, and a set of analytic inequalities proven in the appendices. The only physical modeling choice is Ω = 1 (RG fixed point), inherited from prior work. No data are fitted; the noncommutativity parameter θ, mass M², and coupling λ are inputs. The small exponents used in the norms are arbitrary and chosen to satisfy summability conditions.

free parameters (1)
  • Small exponents in function spaces (ε, ε', δ, δ', κ, σ) = Arbitrarily small positive numbers
    Chosen by hand to satisfy the summability and interpolation conditions (Lemma 4.2: 2α+2β-2ε' > 1; Lemma 6.2: pδ' > 1 and p(2κ-ε) > 4; Theorem 6.3: σ small). They are not fitted to data and do not affect the physical content; the existence of a suitable choice is itself part of the proofs.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The model is restricted to the RG fixed point Ω = 1 (Section 2, after the formula for G_mn;kl).
    Inherited from [10,9]; the paper assumes Ω = 1 so the harmonic potential term simplifies. This is a modeling assumption for the class of theories constructed.
  • domain assumption Renormalization subtracts only contractions of adjacent free-field components (Section 2, 'In short summary, we only need to subtract contractions of adjacent free field components').
    This defines the renormalized Wick products and the correct stochastic quantization equation; it is motivated by the cyclic trace structure of the Moyal action.
  • standard math Gaussian hypercontractivity bounds (Appendix A) apply to the stationary OU process z.
    Used throughout to convert L² moment bounds to Lᵖ bounds for the Wick products and the N5 operator.
  • domain assumption The stationary OU process z exists with regularity H^(-1/2-ε) (Lemma E.1).
    Standard for OU processes on the matrix basis with negative times; the covariance decay A_mn^{-1} gives the regularity.
  • domain assumption The initial data satisfies v(0) ∈ H⁰ and φ(0) = z(0) + v(0) ∈ H^(-1/2-ε) (Theorems 5.6, 7.1).
    Necessary for the fixed-point argument and the Krylov-Bogoliubov tightness.
  • standard math Multiplication inequalities for matrix spaces H^α and M^p (Appendices C and D).
    Key estimates for the nonlinear terms N2,...,N7 rely on these correlation-function inequalities; proven using Feynman parametrization.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Stochastic quantization of $\lambda \phi_2^4$- theory in 2-d Moyal space." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CSH6CWQU

@misc{pith2026250202355,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Stochastic quantization of $\lambda \phi_2^4$- theory in 2-d Moyal space},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CSH6CWQU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.02355}
}
abstract

There is strong evidence for the conjecture that the $\lambda \phi^4$ QFT- model on 4-dimensional non-commutative Moyal space can be non-perturbatively constructed. As preparation, in this paper we construct the 2-dimensional case with the method of stochastic quantization. We show the local well-posedness and global well-posedness of the stochastic quantization equation, leading to a construction of the Moyal $\lambda \phi^4_2$ measure for any non-negative coupling constant $\lambda$.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages

  1. [41]

    Constructive renormalization of the 2-dimensional Grosse-Wulkenhaar model

    Zhituo Wang. Constructive renormalization of the 2-dimensional Grosse-Wulkenhaar model. Annales H. Poincar´ e, 19(8):2435–2490, 2018

    work page 2018

  2. [7]

    Ergodicity for infinite dimensional systems , volume 229

    Giuseppe Da Prato and Jerzy Zabczyk. Ergodicity for infinite dimensional systems , volume 229. Cambridge University Press, 1996

    work page 1996

  3. [1]

    Marginal triviality of the scaling limits of critical 4D Ising and ϕ4 4 models

    Michael Aizenman and Hugo Duminil-Copin. Marginal triviality of the scaling limits of critical 4D Ising and ϕ4 4 models. Annals Math., 194(1):163, 2021

    work page 2021

  4. [2]

    Stochastic differential equations in infinite dimensions: solutions via dirichlet forms

    Sergio Albeverio and Michael R¨ ockner. Stochastic differential equations in infinite dimensions: solutions via dirichlet forms. Probability theory and related fields , 89(3):347–386, 1991

    work page 1991

  5. [3]

    Bruned, A

    Y. Bruned, A. Chandra, I. Chevyrev, and M. Hairer. Renormalising SPDEs in regularity structures. J. Eur. Math. Soc. , 23(3):869–947, 2021

    work page 2021

  6. [4]

    A stochastic analysis approach to tensor field theories

    Ajay Chandra and L´ eonard Ferdinand. A stochastic analysis approach to tensor field theories. ArXiv preprint arXiv:2306.05305 , 2023

    arXiv 2023

  7. [5]

    A priori bounds for the Φ 4 equation in the full sub-critical regime

    Ajay Chandra, Augustin Moinat, and Hendrik Weber. A priori bounds for the Φ 4 equation in the full sub-critical regime. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. , 247(3):0, 2023

    work page 2023

  8. [6]

    Strong solutions to the stochastic quantization equations

    Giuseppe Da Prato and Arnaud Debussche. Strong solutions to the stochastic quantization equations. The Annals of Probability , 31(4):1900–1916, 2003

    work page 1900

Show all 42 references
  1. [8]

    Nested Catalan tables and a recurrence relation in noncom- mutative quantum field theory

    Jins de Jong, Alexander Hock, and Raimar Wulkenhaar. Nested Catalan tables and a recurrence relation in noncom- mutative quantum field theory. Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e D Comb. Phys. Interact., 9(1):47–72, 2022

    2022

  2. [9]

    Vanishing of beta function of non- commutative Φ4 4 theory to all orders

    Margherita Disertori, Razvan Gurau, Jacques Magnen, and Vincent Rivasseau. Vanishing of beta function of non- commutative Φ4 4 theory to all orders. Phys. Lett. B , 649:95–102, 2007

    2007

  3. [10]

    Two- and three-loop beta function of non-commutative Φ 4 4 theory

    Margherita Disertori and Vincent Rivasseau. Two- and three-loop beta function of non-commutative Φ 4 4 theory. Eur. Phys. J. C , 50:661–671, 2007

    2007

  4. [11]

    Parabolic stochastic quantisation of the fractional Φ 4 3 model in the full subcritical regime

    Pawe l Duch, Massimiliano Gubinelli, and Paolo Rinaldi. Parabolic stochastic quantisation of the fractional Φ 4 3 model in the full subcritical regime. ArXiv preprint arXiv:2303.18112 , 2023

    2023

  5. [12]

    A priori bounds for the dynamic fractional Φ4 model on T3 in the full subcritical regime

    Salvador Esquivel and Hendrik Weber. A priori bounds for the dynamic fractional Φ4 model on T3 in the full subcritical regime. ArXiv preprint arXiv:2411.16536 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  6. [13]

    Divergencies in a field theory on quantum space

    Thomas Filk. Divergencies in a field theory on quantum space. Phys. Lett., B376:53–58, 1996

    1996

  7. [14]

    Multidimensional stochastic processes as rough paths: theory and applications , volume 120

    Peter K Friz and Nicolas B Victoir. Multidimensional stochastic processes as rough paths: theory and applications , volume 120. Cambridge University Press, 2010

    2010

  8. [15]

    Algebras of distributions suitable for phase-space quantum mechanics

    Jos´ e M Gracia-Bonda and Joseph C Varilly. Algebras of distributions suitable for phase-space quantum mechanics. I. J. Math. Phys. , 29(4):869–879, 1988

    1988

  9. [16]

    Solution of all quartic matrix models

    Harald Grosse, Alexander Hock, and Raimar Wulkenhaar. Solution of all quartic matrix models. ArXiv preprint arXiv:1906.04600 , 6 2019

    1906

  10. [17]

    Solution of the self-dual Φ 4 QFT-model on four-dimensional Moyal space

    Harald Grosse, Alexander Hock, and Raimar Wulkenhaar. Solution of the self-dual Φ 4 QFT-model on four-dimensional Moyal space. JHEP, 01:81, 2020. With an appendix by R. Seiringer

    2020

  11. [18]

    Renormalisation of ϕ4-theory on noncommutative R2 in the matrix base

    Harald Grosse and Raimar Wulkenhaar. Renormalisation of ϕ4-theory on noncommutative R2 in the matrix base. JHEP, 12:19, 2003

    2003

  12. [19]

    The β-function in duality covariant noncommutative ϕ4-theory

    Harald Grosse and Raimar Wulkenhaar. The β-function in duality covariant noncommutative ϕ4-theory. Eur. Phys. J. C , 35:277–282, 2004

    2004

  13. [20]

    Power-counting theorem for non-local matrix models and renormalisation

    Harald Grosse and Raimar Wulkenhaar. Power-counting theorem for non-local matrix models and renormalisation. Commun. Math. Phys. , 254:91–127, 2005

    2005

  14. [21]

    Renormalisation of ϕ4-theory on noncommutative R4 in the matrix base

    Harald Grosse and Raimar Wulkenhaar. Renormalisation of ϕ4-theory on noncommutative R4 in the matrix base. Commun. Math. Phys. , 256:305–374, 2005

    2005

  15. [22]

    Self-dual noncommutative ϕ4-theory in four dimensions is a non-perturbatively solvable and non-trivial quantum field theory

    Harald Grosse and Raimar Wulkenhaar. Self-dual noncommutative ϕ4-theory in four dimensions is a non-perturbatively solvable and non-trivial quantum field theory. Commun. Math. Phys. , 329:1069–1130, 2014

    2014

  16. [23]

    A PDE construction of the Euclidean ϕ4 3 quantum field theory

    Massimiliano Gubinelli and Martina Hofmanov´ a. A PDE construction of the Euclidean ϕ4 3 quantum field theory. Comm. Math. Phys. , 384(1):1–75, 2021

    2021

  17. [24]

    Paracontrolled distributions and singular pdes

    Massimiliano Gubinelli, Peter Imkeller, and Nicolas Perkowski. Paracontrolled distributions and singular pdes. In Forum of Mathematics, Pi , volume 3, page 0. Cambridge University Press, 2015. STOCHASTIC QUANTIZATION OF λϕ4 2- THEORY IN 2-D MOYAL SPACE 69

    2015

  18. [25]

    The multiscale loop vertex expansion

    Razvan Gurau and Vincent Rivasseau. The multiscale loop vertex expansion. Annales H. Poincar´ e, 16(8):1869–1897, 2015

    2015

  19. [26]

    A theory of regularity structures

    Martin Hairer. A theory of regularity structures. Inventiones mathematicae, 198(2):269–504, 2014

    2014

  20. [27]

    On the stochastic quantization of field theory

    Giovanni Jona-Lasinio and Pronob K Mitter. On the stochastic quantization of field theory. Commun Math. Phys. , 101:409–436, 1985

    1985

  21. [28]

    Noncommutative perturbative dynamics

    Shiraz Minwalla, Mark Van Raamsdonk, and Nathan Seiberg. Noncommutative perturbative dynamics. JHEP, 02:20, 2000

    2000

  22. [29]

    Space-time localisation for the dynamic Φ 4 3 model

    Augustin Moinat and Hendrik Weber. Space-time localisation for the dynamic Φ 4 3 model. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. , 73(12):2519–2555, 2020

    2020

  23. [30]

    Global well-posedness of the dynamic Φ 4 model in the plane

    Jean-Christophe Mourrat and Hendrik Weber. Global well-posedness of the dynamic Φ 4 model in the plane. The Annals of Probability , 45(4):2398–2476, 2017

    2017

  24. [31]

    The dynamic Φ 4 3 model comes down from infinity

    Jean-Christophe Mourrat and Hendrik Weber. The dynamic Φ 4 3 model comes down from infinity. Comm. Math. Phys. , 356(3):673–753, 2017

    2017

  25. [32]

    Malliavin calculus and related topics

    David Nualart. Malliavin calculus and related topics. 2006

    2006

  26. [33]

    Lambert-W solves the noncommutative φ4-model

    Erik Panzer and Raimar Wulkenhaar. Lambert-W solves the noncommutative φ4-model. Commun. Math. Phys. , 374(3):1935–1961, 2019

    1935

  27. [34]

    Perturbation theory without gauge fixing

    Georgio Parisi, Yong Shi Wu et al. Perturbation theory without gauge fixing. Sci. sin , 24(4):483–496, 1981

    1981

  28. [35]

    An introduction to quantum field theory

    Michael E Peskin. An introduction to quantum field theory . CRC press, 2018

    2018

  29. [36]

    Constructive matrix theory

    Vincent Rivasseau. Constructive matrix theory. JHEP, 09:8, 2007

    2007

  30. [37]

    Non-commutative renormalization

    Vincent Rivasseau. Non-commutative renormalization. Prog. Math. Phys. , 53:19–107, 2007

    2007

  31. [38]

    D-branes and deformation quantization

    Volker Schomerus. D-branes and deformation quantization. JHEP, 06:30, 1999

    1999

  32. [39]

    String theory and noncommutative geometry

    Nathan Seiberg and Edward Witten. String theory and noncommutative geometry. JHEP, 09:32, 1999

    1999

  33. [40]

    Spectral gap for the stochastic quantization equation on the 2-dimensional torus

    Pavlos Tsatsoulis and Hendrik Weber. Spectral gap for the stochastic quantization equation on the 2-dimensional torus. Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincar´ e, Probabilit´ es et Statistiques, 54(3):1204–1249, 2018

    2018

  34. [42]

    Wilson and John B

    Kenneth G. Wilson and John B. Kogut. The renormalization group and the epsilon expansion. Phys. Rept., 12:75–199, 1974. Chunqiu Song: Institut f¨ur Analysis und Numerik, Universit¨at M¨unester Email address : chunqiu.song@uni-muenster.de Hendrik Weber: Institut f¨ur Analysis u...

    1974

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.