Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 34 references

Influence of the growth temperature and annealing on the optical properties of {CdO/ZnO}30 superlattices

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Growth temperature of the MBE process determines whether {CdO/ZnO} superlattices keep their periodic order through 900 °C annealing and how their photoluminescence changes.

desk verdict Useful incremental optical dataset on {CdO/ZnO} superlattices, but the homogeneous-alloy-after-annealing claim is under-supported and needs direct nanoscale evidence or softer language. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.02551 v1 pith:BOQBOKQK submitted 2025-02-04 cond-mat.mtrl-sci physics.optics

E. Przeździecka , A. Lysak , A. Adhikari , M. Stachowicz , A. Wierzbicka , R. Jakiela , K. Zeinab , P. Sybilski
show 1 more author
A. Kozanecki
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.optics PACS 78.55.Et78.66.Hf81.15.Hi
keywords CdO/ZnOsuperlatticesplasma-assistedmolecularbeamepitaxyrapidthermalannealingphotoluminescenceX-raydiffractionSIMSdepthprofilingbandgapengineeringUrbachenergy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports that short-period {CdO/ZnO}30 superlattices can be grown by plasma-assisted molecular beam epitaxy at substrate temperatures from 360 to 550 °C, and that the growth temperature sets both their structural quality and their optical response. Lower growth temperatures give better crystallographic order, judged by sharper and higher-order X-ray satellite peaks. After rapid thermal annealing at 900 °C, only the sample grown at 360 °C still shows superlattice satellites; the others lose their periodic structure, which the authors attribute to cadmium–zinc interdiffusion and conversion to a CdZnO alloy. In every annealed sample the near-band-edge luminescence shifts to lower energy and a broad defect band near 3.1 eV appears, with intensity that grows with the original growth temperature. This matters because digital superlattices are a way to tune the band gap of oxide semiconductors without changing source-cell compositions, and their response to high-temperature processing controls whether they can survive real device fabrication.

What carries the argument

The central object is the {CdO/ZnO} superlattice period itself, used as a digital alloy whose average composition is fixed by the sequence of CdO and ZnO sublayers rather than by cell temperatures. The argument is carried by four measurements working together: X-ray diffraction satellite reflections, which report the survival of periodic order; SIMS depth profiles, which report the cadmium distribution averaged over a depth resolution too coarse to see the individual layers; low-temperature photoluminescence, which reports near-band-edge and defect emission; and Tauc-plot optical absorption with Urbach energies, which report the optical gap and disorder. The mechanism connecting them is thermal interdiffusion of Cd and Zn during the 900 °C anneal, with interface quality from the growth step controlling how readily that interdiffusion proceeds.

What would settle it

A cross-sectional transmission electron microscope image or atom-probe composition map of a 900 °C annealed sample would settle the claim: if it shows intact CdO and ZnO layers while the X-ray satellites have vanished, the proposed homogenization into a CdZnO alloy is not established; if it shows a uniform cation distribution, the paper's reading is confirmed.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper establishes that the MBE growth temperature is a control parameter for {CdO/ZnO}30 digital alloys: low-temperature growth yields well-ordered superlattices, while high-temperature growth degrades interface quality and makes the structure more vulnerable to high-temperature annealing. The structural marker is the set of X-ray diffraction satellites: as-grown samples all show satellites up to at least several orders, with the clearest pattern at 360 °C, and after 900 °C annealing the satellites survive only in the 360 °C sample. The optical marker is the photoluminescence: as-grown samples emit mainly from ZnO sublayers near 3.36 eV, while annealed samples show a redshifted near-band-edge emission between about 3.31 and 3.33 eV plus a defect band near 3.1 eV whose relative strength increases with growth temperature. The authors read the redshift and the loss of satellite structure as evidence that annealing homogenizes the superlattice into a CdZnO alloy with a smaller optical gap, and they take the growth-temperature dependence of the defect band as evidence that interface quality inherited from growth controls how much interdiffusion occurs.

Load-bearing premise

The paper's central interpretation assumes that the disappearance of X-ray satellites and the flattening of the cadmium depth profile after annealing mean that cadmium and zinc truly interdiffused into a homogeneous CdZnO alloy, even though the profile measurement itself cannot resolve the original individual layers.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A 360 °C growth temperature preserves the superlattice's periodic order through a 900 °C rapid thermal anneal, while growth at 400 °C and above does not.
  • Annealing at 900 °C lowers the optical gap of every sample, consistent with the formation of a Cd-containing alloy rather than unchanged ZnO-like layers.
  • The relative intensity of the ~3.1 eV defect band is set by the growth temperature, so choosing the growth temperature selects not only the band gap but the defect emission spectrum after annealing.
  • Urbach energies rise after annealing at all growth temperatures, indicating that the annealed structures are more disordered than the as-grown superlattices.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper's SIMS data cannot resolve individual CdO and ZnO layers, so the flat cadmium profile after annealing may partly be a depth-resolution artifact; a direct nanoscale composition map would be needed to confirm true interdiffusion.
  • If lower growth temperature really preserves periodicity, one could exploit that by growing regions of the same wafer at different temperatures and annealing once, producing patterned areas that remain digital alloys or become homogeneous alloys in a single step.
  • The 3.1 eV defect band's growth-temperature dependence suggests that defect emission in oxide digital alloys might be deliberately engineered through thermal history, a possibility the paper does not pursue.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports a study of {CdO/ZnO}30 superlattices grown by plasma-assisted MBE on m-plane sapphire at growth temperatures from 360 to 550 °C, with and without subsequent rapid thermal annealing at 900 °C in O2. The authors use HR-XRD, SIMS, photoluminescence, and optical transmittance to characterize the structures. They find that lower growth temperatures yield better crystallographic quality (higher-order XRD satellites), that after annealing only the 360 °C sample retains superlattice satellites, and that all annealed samples show a redshifted near-band-edge emission and a broad defect-related band near 3.1 eV whose relative intensity increases with growth temperature. The paper interprets these observations as evidence for Cd/Zn interdiffusion during annealing, forming a homogeneous CdZnO alloy, and proposes that growth temperature controls both the structural stability and the optical response of the superlattices.

Significance. If the central interpretation holds, the paper provides a useful demonstration that growth temperature is a control parameter for the structural and optical properties of short-period CdO/ZnO superlattices, with relevance to band-gap engineering in oxide-based optoelectronics. The main strengths are the complementary use of XRD, SIMS, PL, and transmittance, and the internal consistency of the qualitative trends, e.g., better crystallinity at lower growth temperatures and increased disorder after annealing. The paper does not rely on a fitted target whose output is the conclusion, so there is no circularity in the argumentation. However, the quantitative claims about Eg and Urbach energies rest on single measurements without error bars, and the key microstructural interpretation (complete interdiffusion to a homogeneous alloy) is underdetermined by the presented evidence, as the authors themselves note the limited SIMS depth resolution. Direct nanoscale composition evidence would substantially strengthen the paper.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 2.1, Fig. 2 and surrounding text] The conclusion that annealing converts the superlattices into a homogeneous CdZnO alloy rests on two observations: the disappearance of XRD satellites for growth temperatures above 360 °C and the nearly flat SIMS Cd depth profile after annealing. The authors explicitly state that individual CdO and ZnO layers are 'almost impossible to detect' in SIMS due to limited depth resolution, so the flat post-anneal Cd profile does not demonstrate complete intermixing; it could equally arise from depth-resolution smearing, interface roughening, or partial phase separation into Cd-rich and Zn-rich domains. Loss of XRD satellites shows loss of long-range periodicity but not chemical homogeneity. Without cross-sectional TEM/STEM composition maps or quantitative EDX/EELS line profiles of the annealed films, the assignment of the redshifted near-band-edge emission and the 3.1 eV defect band to a homogeneous CdZnO alloy is underdetermined. Please provide direct nanoscale composition evidence, or alternatively temper the claim to 'partial intermixing' and discuss possible phase-separated or roughened microstructures.
  2. [Sec. 2.2, Eq. (5) and Fig. 8] The reported Eg and Urbach energies are given as single values with no error bars, no replicate samples, and no demonstration of the Tauc linear-region fits. The text states that the optical gaps 'could be determined from the extrapolation to zero of the linear regions of (αhν)^2 = f(hν) (Fig. 8 (b))', but Fig. 8(b) plots Eg versus growth temperature, not the Tauc plots. Please show representative (αhν)^2 versus hν curves with the fitted linear regions and extrapolations, state the uncertainties on Eg and Urbach energy, and confirm that the claimed trends (e.g., Eg decreasing with growth temperature in as-grown samples, Urbach energy minimum at 500 °C, and the systematic increase of Urbach energy upon annealing) exceed the measurement uncertainty.
  3. [Sec. 2.2, Fig. 3(b) and Fig. 7] The broad luminescence band near 3.1 eV in annealed samples is a central observation, and the paper concludes that its intensity and spectral position depend on growth temperature. However, the band is not assigned to any specific defect; the statement that 'the changing position of the defect luminescence suggests the formation of another type of defects' is speculative. If this band is used as a key indicator of the growth-temperature dependence, please provide supporting evidence such as excitation-power-dependent PL, time-resolved PL, or comparison with known defect levels in ZnCdO, or explicitly label the band as unassigned and discuss alternative origins (e.g., alloy fluctuations, interface states, or phase-separated domains).
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and throughout] There are numerous typographical and grammatical issues, e.g., 'various defect luminescence located at different energetic positions , were detected' in the abstract, 'interdifussion' in Sec. 2.1, and missing articles throughout. A careful language edit is needed.
  2. [Sec. 2.2, Eq. (5)] The equation for beta is garbled: 'It is a temperature independent constant that depends on the refractive index no and correlated with β by following equation' should define n0 and present the expression cleanly; 'no' appears to be a typo for n0.
  3. [Fig. 6 caption] The caption uses 'RTA' while the text uses 'RTP'; please unify the terminology (rapid thermal processing/annealing) consistently.
  4. [Sec. 2.1, Table 1 and Fig. 1(c)] The lattice parameters a(100) are listed without uncertainties, and Fig. 1(c) shows average lattice parameter values with no error bars; adding uncertainties would help assess whether the observed shifts are significant.
  5. [Introduction and Conclusions] The phrase 'the number of papers about SLs - quasi-ternary alloys based on oxides is very limited' would benefit from a few more recent references, and the conclusion that 'another type of defects' forms should be phrased as a hypothesis rather than a definitive statement.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: conclusions are empirical correlations from measured XRD, SIMS, and PL data; self-citations are contextual, not load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is empirical rather than definitional: growth temperature is varied, and XRD, SIMS, PL, transmittance, and Tauc-gap measurements are reported. The central claim that annealing causes Cd/Zn interdiffusion and alloy formation is an interpretation of observed XRD satellite loss and SIMS profile flattening, supported by prior published interdiffusion data [20], but it is not an equation fitted to the optical output and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The optical conclusions (redshifted NBE, growth-temperature-dependent defect band near 3.1 eV) follow directly from measured spectra, not from the cited prior work. Self-citations to earlier TEM and interdiffusion studies [19,20,24] are contextual support rather than load-bearing derivations; even if those prior results were not fully conclusive, the present conclusions rest on the measurements shown in this paper. The reviewer concern that the annealed samples might be phase-separated or only partially intermixed is an evidence-sufficiency or correctness issue, not a circularity issue, because the paper does not define its conclusion into its evidence. The score of 1 reflects only the presence of minor self-citations that do not carry the derivation.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted to support the central claim; Eg and Urbach energies are measured outputs of standard analyses. The main interpretive assumptions are empirical models (Tauc, Beer-Lambert, SIMS RSF) and literature-based PL peak assignments, plus the assumption that the annealed SLs become a homogeneous alloy. No new entities are postulated.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Tauc relation alpha*h*nu = beta*(h*nu - Eg)^n with n=1/2 for direct allowed transitions describes the absorption edge of these SLs.
    Used in Sec. 2.2 to extract Eg from (alpha*h*nu)^2 vs h*nu plots. If the SLs do not behave as direct-gap semiconductors, extracted Eg values would be inaccurate, though the observed redshift trend may persist.
  • domain assumption Beer-Lambert law alpha = -ln(T)/d gives the absorption coefficient from transmittance with a single well-defined film thickness d.
    Used in Eq. (6); ignores reflection losses, thickness non-uniformity, and substrate contributions, which affects absolute Eg and Urbach values.
  • domain assumption SIMS Cd concentration quantified by CdCs+/OCs+ ratios with RSF from a standard sample, and a flat Cd profile after annealing is interpreted as interdiffusion.
    Sec. 2.1; limited depth resolution means the flat profile could also be explained by smearing. The paper itself acknowledges this caveat.
  • domain assumption PL peaks at ~3.36 eV, 3.317 eV and the broad band near 3.1 eV correspond to D0X/FX, DAP, and defect states, respectively.
    Sec. 2.2 assignments rely on literature values; the authors state the defect origin is not clearly attributable. Not load-bearing for the main growth-temperature correlation, but used for interpretation.
  • domain assumption The wurtzite structure and published CdO/ZnO phase behavior apply to these samples.
    Assumed when indexing XRD peaks and explaining phase separation; supported by prior literature.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Influence of the growth temperature and annealing on the optical properties of {CdO/ZnO}30 superlattices." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BOQBOKQK

@misc{pith2026250202551,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Influence of the growth temperature and annealing on the optical properties of CdO/ZnO30 superlattices},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BOQBOKQK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.02551}
}
read the original abstract

Optical properties of the short period {CdO/ZnO} superlattices grown by plasma assisted MBE were analyzed. The superlattice (SLs) structures were successfully obtained at different growth temperatures from 360 to 550 {\deg}C. Interestingly, the growth temperature of the SLs influences quality of multilayers and also optical properties of these structures. After annealing at 900{\deg}C by rapid thermal method various defect luminescence located at different energetic positions , were detected, and intensity of luminescence strongly depends on applied growth temperature.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

34 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Przezdziecka, M

    E. Przezdziecka, M. Stachowicz, S. Chusnutdinow, R. Jakieła, A. Kozanecki, Electron beam induced current profiling of the p-ZnO:N/n-GaN heterojunction, Appl. Phys. Lett. 106 (2015) 062106. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4908291

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4908291 2015

  2. [2]

    Przeździecka, K

    E. Przeździecka, K. Gościński, M. Stachowicz, D. Dobosz, E. Zielony, J.M. Sajkowski, M.A. Pietrzyk, E. Płaczek-Popko, A. Kozanecki, Spectrum selective UV detectors from an p-ZnO:As/n-GaN diodes grown by Molecular Beam Epitaxy, Sensors Actuators, A Phys. 195 (2013) 27–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2013.02.021

    work page doi:10.1016/j.sna.2013.02.021 2013

  3. [3]

    J. Cui, S. Sadofev, S. Blumstengel, J. Puis, F. Henneberger, Optical gain and lasing of ZnO/ZnMgO multiple quantum wells: From low to room temperature, Appl. Phys. Lett. 89 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2266371

    work page doi:10.1063/1.2266371 2006

  4. [4]

    Zheng, L

    Z. Zheng, L. Gan, H. Li, Y. Ma, Y. Bando, D. Golberg, T. Zhai, A fully transparent and 13 flexible ultraviolet-visible photodetector based on controlled electrospun ZnO-CdO heterojunction nanofiber arrays, Adv. Funct. Mater. 25 (2015) 5885–5894. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201502499

    work page doi:10.1002/adfm.201502499 2015

  5. [5]

    Kim, C.Y

    J.H. Kim, C.Y. Han, K.H. Lee, K.S. An, W. Song, J. Kim, M.S. Oh, Y.R. Do, H. Yang, Performance improvement of quantum dot-light-emitting diodes enabled by an alloyed ZnMgO nanoparticle electron transport layer, Chem. Mater. 27 (2015) 197–204. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm503756q

    work page doi:10.1021/cm503756q 2015

  6. [6]

    S. Raja, P. V. Bhuvaneswari, R. Ramesh Babu, V. Gokulakrishnan, K. Ramamurthi, Studies on the structural, morphological, electrical and optical properties of (CdO)x(ZnO)1−x thin films deposited by spray pyrolysis method, J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 27 (2016) 8111–8117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-016-4812-y

    work page doi:10.1007/s10854-016-4812-y 2016

  7. [7]

    Tabet-Derraz, N

    H. Tabet-Derraz, N. Benramdane, D. Nacer, A. Bouzidi, M. Medles, Investigations on ZnxCd1-xO thin films obtained by spray pyrolysis, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells. 73 (2002) 249–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-0248(01)00134-9

    work page doi:10.1016/s0927-0248(01)00134-9 2002

  8. [9]

    Bertram, S

    F. Bertram, S. Giemsch, D. Forster, J. Christen, R. Kling, C. Kirchner, A. Waag, Direct imaging of phase separation in ZnCdO layers, Appl. Phys. Lett. 88 (2006) 11–14. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2172146

    work page doi:10.1063/1.2172146 2006

Show all 34 references
  1. [10]

    Singh, A

    A. Singh, A. Vij, D. Kumar, P.K. Khanna, M. Kumar, S. Gautam, K.H. Chae, Investigation of phase segregation in sol–gel derived ZnMgO thin films, Semicond. Sci. Technol. 28 (2013) 025004. https://doi.org/10.1088/0268-1242/28/2/025004

    2013 doi

  2. [11]

    Venkatachalapathy, A

    V. Venkatachalapathy, A. Galeckas, M. Trunk, T. Zhang, A. Azarov, A.Y. Kuznetsov, Understanding phase separation in ZnCdO by a combination of structural and optical analysis, Phys. Rev. B - Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 83 (2011) 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.83.125315

    2011 doi

  3. [12]

    C.W. Sun, P. Xin, C.Y. Ma, Z.W. Liu, Q.Y. Zhang, Y.Q. Wang, Z.J. Yin, S. Huang, T. Chen, Optical and electrical properties of Zn1-xCdxO films grown on Si substrates by reactive radio-frequency magnetron sputtering, Appl. Phys. Lett. 89 (2006) 2–5. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2378527

    2006 doi

  4. [13]

    Kaliusniak, S

    S. Kaliusniak, S. Sadofed, J. Puls, F. Henneberger, Laser Photonics Reviews - 2009 - Kalusniak - ZnCdO ZnO a new heterosystem for green‐ wavelength semiconductor lasing.pdf, Laser Photon. Rev. 3 (2008) 233

    2008

  5. [14]

    Singh, D

    A. Singh, D. Kumar, P.K. Khanna, B.C. Joshi, M. Kumar, Effect of post annealing temperature on structural and optical properties of ZnCdO thin films deposited by sol- gel method, Appl. Surf. Sci. 258 (2011) 1881–1887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.10.096

    2011 doi

  6. [15]

    Przeździecka, P

    E. Przeździecka, P. Strąk, A. Wierzbicka, A. Adhikari, A. Lysak, P. Sybilski, J.M. Sajkowski, The Band ‑ Gap Studies of Short ‑ Period CdO / MgO Superlattices, Nanoscale Res. Lett. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-021-03517-y

    2021 doi

  7. [16]

    Przezdziecka, A

    E. Przezdziecka, A. Wierzbicka, P. Dluzewski, I. Sankowska, P. Sybilski, K. Morawiec, A. Pietrzyk, A. Kozanecki, Short-Period CdO / MgO Superlattices as Cubic CdMgO Quasi-Alloys, Cryst. Grwoth Des. 20 (2020) 5466. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.cgd.0c00678

    2020 doi

  8. [18]

    Stachowicz, M

    M. Stachowicz, M. Pietrzyk, D. Jarosz, P. Dluzewski, E. Alves, A. Kozanecki, 14 Backscattering analysis of short period ZnO/MgO superlattices, Surf. Coatings Technol. 355 (2018) 45–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2018.01.040

    2018 doi

  9. [19]

    Lysak, E

    A. Lysak, E. Przezdziecka, A. Wierzbicka, P. Dłuzewski, J. Sajkowski, K. Morawiec, A. Kozanecki, The Influence of the Growth Temperature on the Structural Properties of { CdO / ZnO } 30 Superlattices, Cryst. Growth Des. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.cgd.2c00826

    2022 doi

  10. [20]

    Stachowicz, J.M

    M. Stachowicz, J.M. Sajkowski, M.A. Pietrzyk, D.N. Faye, S. Magalhaes, E. Alves, A. Reszka, A. Pieniążek, A. Kozanecki, Investigation of interdiffusion in thin films of ZnO/ZnCdO grown by molecular beam epitaxy, Thin Solid Films. 781 (2023) 140003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ts...

    2023

  11. [21]

    Siddharth, R

    G. Siddharth, R. Singh, V. Garg, B.S. Sengar, M. Das, B. Mandal, M.T. Htay, M. Gupta, S. Mukherjee, Investigation of DIBS-Deposited CdZnO/ZnO-Based Multiple Quantum Well for Large-Area Photovoltaic Application, IEEE Trans. Electron Devices. 67 (2020) 5587–5592. https://doi.org...

    2020

  12. [22]

    Meyer, J

    B.K. Meyer, J. Sann, S. Lautenschläger, M.R. Wagner, A. Hoffmann, Ionized and neutral donor-bound excitons in ZnO, 76 (2007) 184120. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.76.184120

    2007 doi

  13. [23]

    Ahn, Ch, Y

    H. Ahn, Ch, Y. Kim, Y, C. Kim, D, A comparative analysis of deep level emission in ZnO layers deposited by various methods, Jouranl Apllied Phys. 013502 (2009) 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3054175

    2009 doi

  14. [24]

    Lysak, E

    A. Lysak, E. Przeździecka, R. Jakiela, A. Reszka, B. Witkowski, Z. Khosravizadeh, A. Adhikari, J.M. Sajkowski, A. Kozanecki, Effect of rapid thermal annealing on short period {CdO/ZnO}m SLs grown on m-Al2O3, Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 142 (2022) 1–8. https://doi.org/10.101...

    2022

  15. [25]

    Tauc, Optical properties and electronic structure of amorphous Ge and Si, Mater

    J. Tauc, Optical properties and electronic structure of amorphous Ge and Si, Mater. Res. Bull. 3 (1968) 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/0025-5408(68)90023-8

    1968 doi

  16. [26]

    Taylor, E.A

    P. Taylor, E.A. Davis, N.F. Mott, Conduction in non-crystalline systems V . Conductivity , optical absorption and photoconductivity in amorphous semiconductors, Philos. Mag. 22 (1970) 903

    1970

  17. [27]

    Gorczyca, K

    I. Gorczyca, K. Skrobas, N.E. Christensen, J. Sajkowski, M. Stachowicz, H. Teisseyre, A. Kozanecki, ZnO/(Zn)MgO polar and nonpolar superlattices, J. Appl. Phys. 125 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5085055

    2019 doi

  18. [28]

    Adhikari, A

    A. Adhikari, A. Wierzbicka, Z. Adamus, A. Lysak, P. Sybilski, D. Jarosz, E. Przezdziecka, Correlated carrier transport and optical phenomena in CdO layers grown by plasma-assisted molecular beam epitaxy technique, Thin Solid Films. 780 (2023) 139963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j....

    2023

  19. [29]

    Metz, J.R

    A.W. Metz, J.R. Ireland, J.G. Zheng, R.P.S.M. Lobo, Y. Yang, J. Ni, C.L. Stern, V.P. Dravid, N. Bontemps, C.R. Kannewurf, K.R. Poeppelmeier, T.J. Marks, Transparent conducting oxides: Texture and microstructure effects on charge carrier mobility in MOCVD-derived CdO thin films...

    2004 doi

  20. [30]

    D.W. Ma, Z.Z. Ye, J.Y. Huang, L.P. Zhu, B.H. Zhao, J.H. He, Effect of post-annealing treatments on the properties of Zn 1-xCdxO films on glass substrates, Mater. Sci. Eng. B Solid-State Mater. Adv. Technol. 111 (2004) 9–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mseb.2003.12.007

    2004 doi

  21. [31]

    Bharti, A

    G.P. Bharti, A. Khare, Quenching of visible photoluminescence and observation of two photon absorption-induced photoluminescence in pulsed laser deposited Zn1-xTixO (0.000 x 0.050) thin films, J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys. 52 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/aae465. 15

    2019 doi

  22. [32]

    Mingzhu, S

    L. Mingzhu, S. Limei, W. Shan, First-principles study of electronic and optical properties in wurtzite ZnCoo alloys, Appl. Mech. Mater. 333–335 (2013) 1847–1852. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.333-335.1847

    2013 doi

  23. [33]

    El Sayed, S

    A.M. El Sayed, S. Taha, G. Said, F. Yakuphanoglu, Superlattices and Microstructures Controlling the structural and optical properties of nanostructured ZnO thin films by cadmium content, Superlattices Microstruct. 65 (2014) 35–47

    2014

  24. [34]

    Ziabari, F.E

    A.A. Ziabari, F.E. Ghodsi, Synthesis and characterization of nanocrystalline CdZnO thin fi lms prepared by sol-gel dip-coating process, Thin Solid Films. 520 (2011) 1228–

    2011

  25. [35]

    Gupta, M

    R.K. Gupta, M. Cavas, F. Yakuphanoglu, Structural and optical properties of nanostructure CdZnO films, Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 95 (2012) 107–113

    2012

  26. [1232]

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2011.06.075

    2011 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.