Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 181 references

Titan's Fluvial and Lacustrine Landscapes

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This chapter argues that Cassini revealed Titan to be a hydrologically active world whose rivers, lakes, and seas are strikingly similar to Earth's, making the two worlds the only known places with active surface hydrology.

desk verdict A solid, well-hedged review chapter that should be in the book; the 'actively modifying' framing overstates the evidence and should be softened, but the synthesis is useful. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.02556 v1 pith:AIPKTF7R submitted 2025-02-04 astro-ph.EP

Samuel P.D. Birch , Alexander G. Hayes , J. Taylor Perron This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.EP
keywords TitanfluvialgeomorphologylacustrinelandscapesCassiniradarmethanehydrologiccycleplanetaryclimatelakesandseasDragonfly
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review chapter synthesizes what Cassini revealed about Titan's rivers, lakes, and seas and argues that Titan is hydrologically active today, with landscapes shaped by processes closely analogous to Earth's. The authors contend that Titan and Earth are the only worlds in the solar system with active rivers, lakes, and seas, and that Titan therefore offers a global-scale natural experiment for studying how planetary climates and hydrologic cycles are maintained. They also make a cautionary epistemic claim: current knowledge of Titan's hydrology is comparable to knowledge of Mars in the Viking era, because Cassini data are coarse, topographic data are largely missing, and no in situ field measurements exist. The chapter's forward-looking thesis is that Earth-based experiments, numerical modeling, and the Dragonfly mission plus a possible orbiter could turn Titan into a second data point for hydrologic and climate science, including for exoplanets.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing tool is comparative planetary geomorphology at kilometer scale, anchored by Cassini's Synthetic Aperture Radar imagery and by the one meter-scale Huygens view that shows far more dissection than Cassini can resolve. Radars working as altimeters and sounders supply the quantitative core: sea-surface elevations measured to centimeter precision across three flybys place Titan's seas on a common equipotential surface, and sub-surface radar returns give depths and methane-dominated compositions for the largest seas and small lakes. Morphological comparison to terrestrial fluvial, coastal, and karst landforms is what converts these pixels into process interpretations, such as flooded valleys, wave-cut shorelines, river deltas, and dissolution basins.

What would settle it

A future orbiter or Dragonfly image of a polar coastline at roughly 25-meter resolution that resolves deltas at most river mouths would directly contradict the paper's claim that Titan's deltas are rare; conversely, meter-scale images showing abundant valley networks below Cassini's ~700-meter detection limit would falsify the assumption that the mapped network distribution represents Titan's true fluvial landscape.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Cassini observations show that Titan has a working methane-based hydrologic cycle: liquid-filled seas and lakes at the poles, valley networks that drain into them, radar-measured sea depths and liquid compositions, sea-surface elevations consistent with a common equipotential surface, and transient surface changes after rainstorms. The authors' central claim is that these landforms are strikingly similar in form and diversity to terrestrial rivers and lakes, making Titan and Earth the only two worlds known to have active rivers, lakes, and seas. They further argue that the morphology of these features records ongoing and recent climate variations, such as rising northern sea levels and shoreline recession at Ontario Lacus, and that the puzzles left by Cassini—rare deltas, empty southern basins, sharp-edged depressions with raised rims, and the missing ethane—are open questions that define the next decade of Titan science.

Load-bearing premise

The whole synthesis depends on the assumption that Cassini's coarse, partly coverage-limited remote sensing correctly identifies and classifies Titan's landforms, so the absence of features such as deltas, small valleys, and shoreline changes is a real geomorphic signal rather than an artifact of resolution and sparse coverage.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the central claim is right, Titan and Earth are the only two worlds in the solar system with active rivers, lakes, and seas, which makes Titan the only other place where an active hydrologic cycle can be studied in the field.
  • The measured sea-level equipotential establishes a global datum on Titan, so future shoreline observations can be interpreted as true sea-level change rather than local noise.
  • Because the atmosphere holds roughly six times more methane than all surface seas and lakes combined, Titan's lakes function more as passive indicators of climate than as buffers like Earth's oceans.
  • The rarity of observed deltas and shoreline changes implies either that Titan's rivers are inefficient at depositing sediment, that deposits are buried or modified, or that Cassini could not resolve them; distinguishing these is a concrete task for Dragonfly and an orbiter.
  • If small valley networks exist below Cassini's ~700-meter detection limit, as Huygens suggests, then Titan's actual drainage density is much higher than mapped, directly affecting estimates of erosion and sediment budgets.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The chapter leaves implicit that the field-defining puzzles—missing deltas, the north-south lake asymmetry, and the apparent paucity of equatorial rivers—could be partly or wholly instrumental artifacts, since only about 20-40% of the surface is imaged at sufficient resolution; high-resolution imaging would be the direct test.
  • Titan's ternary methane-ethane-nitrogen fluids, with density variations up to ~20%, suggest a testable extension: river plumes entering seas may plunge or float in ways that change where sediment is deposited, which would make Titan a natural laboratory for sedimentology beyond the water-Earth regime.
  • If Titan's methane is ancient rather than a recent transient, the chapter's analogy to Earth's chemical-weathering thermostat implies that Titan's organic and ice-rich crust may regulate its own climate over geologic timescales; measuring weathering rates at Selk Crater could constrain this.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. This manuscript is a review chapter that synthesizes Cassini-era observations of Titan's fluvial and lacustrine landscapes. It covers the distribution and morphology of river valleys (including polar flooded networks, equatorial bright valleys, and fluvial fans), the lakes and seas (bathymetry, composition, sea-level measurements, shoreline features, and small sharp-edged depressions), and the state of knowledge on Titan's hydrologic cycle. The authors argue that Titan is a hydrologically active world whose landscapes resemble Earth's, making it a unique global-scale natural experiment, and they close with a list of outstanding open questions and future mission objectives (Dragonfly and a potential orbiter). The chapter repeatedly acknowledges the severe limitations of Cassini data, including coarse resolution, sparse topography, and incomplete coverage.

Significance. The chapter provides a timely and accessible synthesis of a large body of published work on Titan's surface hydrology, with a useful timeline of discoveries, global maps, and an honest enumeration of unresolved questions. Its main strength is that it consistently identifies where interpretations rest on morphological inference rather than direct measurement, and it emphasizes the need for quantitative geomorphic and climate models. If the central claim that Titan has active rivers and lakes is taken as a working hypothesis, the chapter is a valuable resource for framing future analyses and mission planning. However, the significance of the 'active modification' claim is exactly where the manuscript is most vulnerable, and the authors should align their headline assertions with the caveats they themselves provide in later sections.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 1 and Summary (§5)] The opening sentence, 'Cassini revealed that Titan, like Earth, has vast bodies of standing liquid on its surface today, with rivers actively modifying its landscapes,' and the associated claim that Titan and Earth are 'the only two such worlds where active rivers, lakes, and seas are found' are stronger than the evidence presented in the chapter itself. Section 4, item 1 states that 'whether such rivers even have the necessary tools to incise mechanically' is understudied; Section 4, item 2 states that topographic data are insufficient to confirm incised channels outside Vid Flumina; and Section 2.3 reports that most large valley networks leave no observable deposits, complicating any sediment budget. Observable temporal changes are limited to transient lake filling/disappearance, 'magic islands,' and a contested shoreline recession at Ontario Lacus (Section 3.2, with the Cornet et al. 2012 caveat). Thus 'actively modifying' is an inference from morphology and climate models rather than a directly observed process. I recommend qualifying the headline and abstract statements (e.g., 'consistent with active modification' or 'may be actively modifying'), and mirroring that qualification in the Summary, so that the chapter does not assert as discovery what its own review identifies as an open hypothesis.
  2. [Section 4.7 (missing deltas)] The discussion of Titan's missing deltas presents two explanations (deltas rarely form vs. deltas are hard to identify), but the preceding section (3.2) reports that sediment transport calculations for the Ontario Lacus deposits indicate that deposits 'can readily form in Titan's current climate' (Birch et al. 2022b). The chapter should make explicit how these statements interact: does the Ontario Lacus result imply that the absence of northern deltas reflects a difference in sediment supply, coastal energy, or observation timing, rather than a general inability of Titan rivers to deposit sediment? Without that linkage, the 'outstanding puzzle' framing risks appearing internally inconsistent.
minor comments (4)
  1. [References] Several citations are incomplete or labeled 'in prep' (e.g., 'Palermo et al. (2022), in prep' in Section 2.1, 'Schneck et al. (2022), in prep' in Section 3.1, and 'Birch et al. 2022a' without volume or DOI). For a review chapter, these should be updated to published identifiers or removed if not yet available.
  2. [Section 3.2] The phrase '35× less exposed liquid area than the north' is awkward; consider 'a factor of 35 less' or 'roughly 35 times less' for clarity.
  3. [Section 2.1 and 3.1] The chapter states that Vid Flumina's liquid surface is consistent with sea level 'to within the centimeter-precision of the altimeter' (Section 2.1), but later reports that the three seas' elevations agree 'within 8 meters' (Section 3.1). The distinction between relative precision within a single overpass and absolute accuracy across flybys should be stated explicitly to avoid apparent contradiction.
  4. [Figure 6] The right-hand panel of Figure 6, showing methane fraction, is dense and difficult to read at the resolution provided; consider splitting compositional data into a separate panel or using larger labels in the final version.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the chapter is a review that makes no fitted predictions; its load-bearing observations come from Cassini data and independent published analyses.

full rationale

This is a review/synthesis chapter rather than a derivation paper. It contains no fitted parameters, no equations that define one quantity in terms of another, and no 'prediction' that is actually a fit renamed. The central claims—that Titan has standing liquid, fluvial valley networks, lakes, seas, and some observed transient changes—are presented as observational results from Cassini SAR/VIMS/ISS/altimetry and from published mapping and analyses. Many of those publications include the same authors (e.g., Hayes et al. 2017; Birch et al. 2017; Miller et al. 2021), but the current chapter does not use those citations as a substitute for derivation; the cited works are external, peer-reviewed data analyses, and the chapter repeatedly flags their limitations (e.g., 'mapping is likely to be incomplete for valley networks <700 meters in width' and the Ontario Lacus shoreline recession 'is not definitive given serious resolution limitations' per Cornet et al. 2012). The phrase 'rivers actively modifying its landscapes' is an interpretive synthesis, and Section 4 itself notes that incision rates, sediment supply, and the availability of mechanical erosion tools remain understudied; that gap is an evidentiary weakness, not a circular definition. No step in the chapter reduces to its own input by construction, so the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The chapter contributes no free parameters or invented entities; it is a literature synthesis. It rests on four classes of domain assumptions: the fidelity of Cassini data for geomorphic mapping, the use of terrestrial analogies to assign formative processes, the transferability of terrestrial sediment-transport relations, and the fluid-property model taken from prior work. The chapter is unusually explicit about several of these assumptions, but it does not test them.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Cassini remote sensing correctly resolves and classifies the fluvial and lacustrine landforms used in the synthesis.
    Used throughout Sections 2-3; the chapter itself cautions that coverage is incomplete for channels below 700 m (Section 2), so global distribution statements rest on this assumption.
  • domain assumption Morphologic similarity to terrestrial landforms indicates similar formative processes and materials.
    The chapter interprets dendritic drainage, sapping channels, deltas, beaches, and wave-cut shorelines by analogy with Earth (Sections 2.1 and 3.1), and flags cases where the analogy is ambiguous (Section 2.2).
  • domain assumption Terrestrial river and sediment-transport relations are broadly applicable to Titan's hydrocarbon rivers.
    State explicitly in Section 4.5: 'terrestrial relations that predict the flow and sediment transport rates in rivers should also be broadly applicable to Titan. So long as implicit empiricisms are handled carefully.'
  • domain assumption Titan's fluids are methane-ethane-nitrogen ternary mixtures with the density and viscosity variations computed by Steckloff et al. (2020).
    The discussions of offshore valley darkness, hyperpycnal flows, and river plume dynamics (Sections 2.1 and 4.6) depend on these fluid properties, which the chapter takes from prior work rather than verifying.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Titan's Fluvial and Lacustrine Landscapes." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/AIPKTF7R

@misc{pith2026250202556,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Titan's Fluvial and Lacustrine Landscapes},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/AIPKTF7R}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.02556}
}
read the original abstract

In this chapter we begin with a review of Titan's fluvial and lacustrine landscapes as observed with Cassini remote sensing data, and what the many discoveries have revealed about Titan's surface materials and climate. Yet Cassini remote sensing data are coarse, topographic data are largely lacking, and the absence of in situ field measurements means we have little understanding of what the surface is composed of. At present, our knowledge of Titan's hydrology is comparable to that of Mars in the 1970's during the Viking era. Fortunately, the coming decades promise many new and exciting discoveries that can be achieved through Earth-based experiments, numerical modeling, and a continued commitment to the exploration of Titan by future missions, including both Dragonfly and orbiting assets. We therefore close the chapter with a discussion about what can be done with the current Cassini data and how new data, from both Dragonfly and a potential future orbiter, would allow us to leverage Titan to help solve some of the largest problems both here on Earth and on hydrologic planets and exoplanets more generally.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.02556 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Timeline of Cassini’s and Huygens’ fluvial & lacustrine discoveries. The red, blue, and green colors denote Cassini’s primary, equinox and solstice missions, which took place over less than one half of a Titan year (graphic inspired by Ralph Lorenz). The events listed are described in: (1) Lorenz et al. (2008). (2/3) Turtle et al. (2009). (4) Stofan et al. (2007). (5) Aharonson et al. (2009). (6) Brown et al. (2008)… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Comparison between Cassini and Huygens imaging. Left: Huygens DISR mosaic of a dendritic fluvial network near its landing site. Right: How Cassini’s SAR instrument saw the exact same surface, highlighting just how little we have observed of Titan in detail. The polar valley networks also display great morphologic diversity. Some networks, such as Vid Flumina near Ligeia Mare (Figure 4a), appear dendritic (Burr et al… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Distribution of fluvial and lacustrine features on Titan. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Diversity of fluvially-sculpted landscapes on Titan. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Diversity of lacustrine landscapes on Titan. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Bathymetry and composition of Titan’s largest lakes and seas. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Titan’s Filled and Empty Lakes. (a) Viedma Lacus at Titan’s north, one of the few lakes with both raised rims (yellow arrow) and a surrounding rampart (cyan arrows). (b) Unnamed empty lake at Titan’s south exhibiting many of the classic morphologies of Titan’s sharp-ed…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

181 extracted references · 132 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    G., Hayne, P

    Aharonson, O., Hayes, A. G., Hayne, P. O., et al. 2014, in Titan: Interior, Surface, Atmosphere, and Space Environment, ed. C. A. Griffith, E. Lellouch, I. M¨ uller-Wodarg, & T. E. Cravens, Cambridge Planetary Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 63–101, doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511667398.005

    work page doi:10.1017/cbo9780511667398.005 2014

  2. [2]

    G., Lunine, J

    Aharonson, O., Hayes, A. G., Lunine, J. I., et al. 2009, Nature Geoscience, 2, 851, doi: 10.1038/ngeo698

    work page doi:10.1038/ngeo698 2009

  3. [3]

    W., Radebaugh, J., Brown, R

    Barnes, J. W., Radebaugh, J., Brown, R. H., et al. 2007, Journal of Geophysical Research (Planets), 112, E11006, doi: 10.1029/2007JE002932

    doi:10.1029/2007je002932 2007

  4. [4]

    W., Brown, R

    Barnes, J. W., Brown, R. H., Soderblom, J. M., et al. 2009, Icarus, 201, 217, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2008.12.028

    work page doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2008.12.028 2009

  5. [5]

    W., Bow, J., Schwartz, J., et al

    Barnes, J. W., Bow, J., Schwartz, J., et al. 2011, Icarus, 216, 136, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2011.08.022

    work page doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2011.08.022 2011

  6. [6]

    W., Sotin, C., Soderblom, J

    Barnes, J. W., Sotin, C., Soderblom, J. M., et al. 2014, Planetary Science, 3, 3, doi: 10.1186/s13535-014-0003-4 22

    doi:10.1186/s13535-014-0003-4 2014

  7. [7]

    W., Turtle, E

    Barnes, J. W., Turtle, E. P., Trainer, M. G., et al. 2021, The Planetary Science Journal, 2, 130, doi: 10.3847/PSJ/abfdcf

    doi:10.3847/psj/abfdcf 2021

  8. [8]

    M., & Lora, J

    Battalio, J. M., & Lora, J. M. 2021, Geophysical Research Letters, 48, e2021GL094244, doi: 10.1029/2021GL094244

    work page doi:10.1029/2021gl094244 2021

Show all 181 references
  1. [9]

    M., Lora, J

    Battalio, J. M., Lora, J. M., Rafkin, S., & Soto, A. 2022, Icarus, 373, 114623, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2021.114623

    2022

  2. [10]

    A., Lasaga, A

    Berner, R. A., Lasaga, A. C., & Garrels, R. M. 1983, Am. J. Sci.; (United States), 283:7, doi: 10.2475/ajs.283.7.641

    1983 doi

  3. [11]

    2018, Icarus, 310, 140, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2017.12.016

    Birch, S., Hayes, A., Corlies, P., et al. 2018, Icarus, 310, 140, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2017.12.016

    2018 doi

  4. [12]

    Birch, S. P. D., Hayes, A. G., Howard, A. D., Moore, J. M., & Radebaugh, J. 2016, Icarus, 270, 238, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2016.02.013

    2016 doi

  5. [13]

    Birch, S. P. D., Hayes, A. G., Dietrich, W. E., et al. 2017, Icarus, 282, 214, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2016.08.003

    2017 doi

  6. [14]

    Birch, S. P. D., Hayes, A. G., Poggiali, V., et al. 2019, Geophysical Research Letters, 46, 5846, doi: 10.1029/2018GL078099

    2019 doi

  7. [15]

    A., Perron, J

    Black, B. A., Perron, J. T., Burr, D. M., & Drummond, S. A. 2012, Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 117, n/a, doi: 10.1029/2012JE004085

    2012 doi

  8. [16]

    A., Perron, J

    Black, B. A., Perron, J. T., Hemingway, D., et al. 2017, Science, 356, 727, doi: 10.1126/science.aag0171

    2017 doi

  9. [17]

    A., Dietrich, W

    Braudrick, C. A., Dietrich, W. E., Leverich, G. T., & Sklar, L. S. 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 16936, doi: 10.1073/pnas.0909417106

    2009 doi

  10. [18]

    F., Rodriguez, S., Cornet, T., et al

    Brossier, J. F., Rodriguez, S., Cornet, T., et al. 2018, Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 123, 1089, doi: 10.1029/2017JE005399

    2018 doi

  11. [19]

    H., Soderblom, L

    Brown, R. H., Soderblom, L. A., Soderblom, J. M., et al. 2008, Nature, 454, 607, doi: 10.1038/nature07100

    2008 doi

  12. [20]

    M., Drummond, S

    Burr, D. M., Drummond, S. A., Cartwright, R., Black, B. A., & Perron, J. T. 2013a, Icarus, 226, 742, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2013.06.016

    2013 doi

  13. [21]

    M., Taylor Perron, J., Lamb, M

    Burr, D. M., Taylor Perron, J., Lamb, M. P., et al. 2013b, Geological Society of America Bulletin, 125, 299, doi: 10.1130/B30612.1

    doi

  14. [22]

    L., Runcevski, T., Maynard-Casely, H

    Cable, M. L., Runcevski, T., Maynard-Casely, H. E., Vu, T. H., & Hodyss, R. 2021, Accounts of Chemical Research, 54, 3050, doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.1c00250

    2021 doi

  15. [23]

    L., Vu, T

    Cable, M. L., Vu, T. H., Malaska, M. J., et al. 2019, ACS Earth and Space Chemistry, 3, 2808, doi: 10.1021/acsearthspacechem.9b00275

    2019 doi

  16. [24]

    B., Black, G

    Campbell, D. B., Black, G. J., Carter, L. M., & Ostro, S. J. 2003, Science, 302, 431, doi: 10.1126/science.1088969

    2003 doi

  17. [25]

    2022, Geophysical Research Letters, 49, e2021GL097602, doi: 10.1029/2021GL097602

    Sotin, C. 2022, Geophysical Research Letters, 49, e2021GL097602, doi: 10.1029/2021GL097602

    2022 doi

  18. [26]

    A., & Kirk, R

    Cartwright, R., Clayton, J. A., & Kirk, R. L. 2011, Icarus, 214, 561, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2011.03.011

    2011 doi

  19. [27]

    2014, Icarus, 241, 269, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2014.07.009

    Wordsworth, R. 2014, Icarus, 241, 269, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2014.07.009

    2014 doi

  20. [28]

    2010, Icarus, 205, 581, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2009.08.011

    Choukroun, M., Grasset, O., Tobie, G., & Sotin, C. 2010, Icarus, 205, 581, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2009.08.011

    2010 doi

  21. [29]

    1980, Earth Surface Processes, 5, 199, doi: 10.1002/esp.3760050213

    Church, M. 1980, Earth Surface Processes, 5, 199, doi: 10.1002/esp.3760050213

    1980 doi

  22. [30]

    Collins, G. C. 2005, GRL, 32, L22202, doi: 10.1029/2005GL024551

    2005 doi

  23. [31]

    W., Kattenhorn, S

    Cook-Hallett, C., Barnes, J. W., Kattenhorn, S. A., et al. 2015, Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 120, 1220, doi: 10.1002/2014JE004645

    2015 doi

  24. [32]

    W., & Ferreira, A

    Cordier, D., Barnes, J. W., & Ferreira, A. G. 2013, Icarus, 226, 1431, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2013.07.026

    2013 doi

  25. [33]

    2019, Nature Geoscience, 12, 315, doi: 10.1038/s41561-019-0344-4

    Cordier, D., & Carrasco, N. 2019, Nature Geoscience, 12, 315, doi: 10.1038/s41561-019-0344-4

    2019 doi

  26. [34]

    W., et al

    Cordier, D., Cornet, T., Barnes, J. W., et al. 2016, Icarus, 270, 41, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2015.12.034

    2016 doi

  27. [35]

    G., Birch, S

    Corlies, P., Hayes, A. G., Birch, S. P. D., et al. 2017, Geophysical Research Letters, 44, 11,754, doi: 10.1002/2017GL075518

    2017 doi

  28. [36]

    L., et al

    Cornet, T., Cordier, D., Bahers, T. L., et al. 2015, Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 120, 1044, doi: 10.1002/2014JE004738

    2015 doi

  29. [37]

    2012, Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 117, n/a, doi: 10.1029/2012JE004073

    Cornet, T., Bourgeois, O., Le Mou´ elic, S., et al. 2012, Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 117, n/a, doi: 10.1029/2012JE004073

    2012 doi

  30. [38]

    A., Jennings, D

    Cottini, V., Nixon, C. A., Jennings, D. E., et al. 2012, Planetary and Space Science, 60, 62, doi: 10.1016/j.pss.2011.03.015

    2012 doi

  31. [39]

    2000, The Massachusetts Review, 41, 297

    Crossley, R. 2000, The Massachusetts Review, 41, 297

    2000

  32. [40]

    2020, The Planetary Science Journal, 1, 76, doi: 10.3847/PSJ/abbf57

    Czaplinski, E., Yu, X., Dzurilla, K., & Chevrier, V. 2020, The Planetary Science Journal, 1, 76, doi: 10.3847/PSJ/abbf57

    2020 doi

  33. [41]

    Chevrier, V. F. 2019, ACS Earth and Space Chemistry, 3, 2353, doi: 10.1021/acsearthspacechem.9b00204

    2019 doi

  34. [42]

    2020, Earth and Space Science, 7, doi: 10.1029/2020EA001127

    Daudon, C., Lucas, A., Rodriguez, S., et al. 2020, Earth and Space Science, 7, doi: 10.1029/2020EA001127

    2020 doi

  35. [43]

    2019, The Astronomical Journal, 158, 230, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ab4907 23

    Radebaugh, J. 2019, The Astronomical Journal, 158, 230, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ab4907 23

    2019 doi

  36. [44]

    E., Bellugi, D

    Dietrich, W. E., Bellugi, D. G., Sklar, L. S., et al. 2013, in Geophysical Monograph Series, ed. P. R. Wilcock & R. M. Iverson (Washington, D. C: American Geophysical Union), 103–132, doi: 10.1029/135GM09

    2013 doi

  37. [45]

    H., Kusack, K

    Dingle, E. H., Kusack, K. M., & Venditti, J. G. 2021, Earth-Science Reviews, 222, 103838, doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2021.103838

    2021

  38. [46]

    L., Heimsath, A

    Dixon, J. L., Heimsath, A. M., Kaste, J., & Amundson, R. 2009, Geology, 37, 975, doi: 10.1130/G30045A.1

    2009 doi

  39. [47]

    Y., Nittrouer, J

    Dong, T. Y., Nittrouer, J. A., Czapiga, M. J., et al. 2019, Water Resources Research, 55, 827, doi: 10.1029/2017WR021985

    2019 doi

  40. [48]

    A., Prairie, Y

    Downing, J. A., Prairie, Y. T., Cole, J. J., et al. 2006, Limnology and Oceanography, 51, 2388, doi: 10.4319/lo.2006.51.5.2388

    2006 doi

  41. [49]

    Dunne, K. B. J., & Jerolmack, D. J. 2020, Science Advances, 6, eabc1505, doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abc1505

    2020 doi

  42. [50]

    K., Chevrier, V

    Farnsworth, K. K., Chevrier, V. F., Steckloff, J. K., et al. 2019, Geophysical Research Letters, 46, 13658, doi: 10.1029/2019GL084792

    2019 doi

  43. [51]

    P., Lora, J

    Faulk, S. P., Lora, J. M., Mitchell, J. L., & Milly, P. C. D. 2020, Nature Astronomy, 4, 390, doi: 10.1038/s41550-019-0963-0

    2020 doi

  44. [52]

    P., Mitchell, J

    Faulk, S. P., Mitchell, J. L., Moon, S., & Lora, J. M. 2017, Nature Geoscience, 10, 827, doi: 10.1038/ngeo3043

    2017 doi

  45. [53]

    L., Perron, J

    Ferrier, K. L., Perron, J. T., Mukhopadhyay, S., et al. 2013, GSA Bulletin, 125, 1146, doi: 10.1130/B30726.1

    2013 doi

  46. [54]

    A., Milliken, R

    Goudge, T. A., Milliken, R. E., Head, J. W., Mustard, J. F., & Fassett, C. I. 2017, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 458, 357, doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2016.10.056

    2017 doi

  47. [55]

    Fassett, C. I. 2021, Nature, 597, 645, doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03860-1

    2021 doi

  48. [56]

    2008, Planetary and Space Science, 56, 346, doi: 10.1016/j.pss.2007.11.001

    Fulchignoni, M. 2008, Planetary and Space Science, 56, 346, doi: 10.1016/j.pss.2007.11.001

    2008 doi

  49. [57]

    A., Lora, J

    Griffith, C. A., Lora, J. M., Turner, J., et al. 2012, Nature, 486, 237, doi: 10.1038/nature11165

    2012 doi

  50. [58]

    1975, in Proc

    Hack, J. 1975, in Proc. 6th Annual Geomorphology Symposia Series, Theories of Landform Development, ed. W. Melhorn & R. Flemal, 87–102

    1975

  51. [59]

    Hall, K., & Thorn, C. E. 2014, Geomorphology, 206, 1, doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2013.09.022

    2014 doi

  52. [60]

    2017, Nature Astronomy, 1, 1, doi: 10.1038/s41550-017-0122

    Hanley, J. 2017, Nature Astronomy, 1, 1, doi: 10.1038/s41550-017-0122

    2017 doi

  53. [61]

    2008, Geophysical Research Letters, 35, L09204, doi: 10.1029/2008GL033409

    Hayes, A., Aharonson, O., Callahan, P., et al. 2008, Geophysical Research Letters, 35, L09204, doi: 10.1029/2008GL033409

    2008 doi

  54. [62]

    2011, Icarus, 211, 655, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2010.08.017

    Hayes, A., Aharonson, O., Lunine, J., et al. 2011, Icarus, 211, 655, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2010.08.017

    2011 doi

  55. [63]

    Hayes, A. G. 2016, Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 44, 57, doi: 10.1146/annurev-earth-060115-012247

    2016 doi

  56. [64]

    G., Lorenz, R

    Hayes, A. G., Lorenz, R. D., & Lunine, J. I. 2018, Nature Geoscience, 11, 306, doi: 10.1038/s41561-018-0103-y

    2018 doi

  57. [65]

    G., Wolf, A

    Hayes, A. G., Wolf, A. S., Aharonson, O., et al. 2010, Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 115, doi: 10.1029/2009JE003557

    2010 doi

  58. [66]

    G., Lorenz, R

    Hayes, A. G., Lorenz, R. D., Donelan, M. A., et al. 2013, Icarus, 225, 403, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2013.04.004

    2013 doi

  59. [67]

    G., Birch, S

    Hayes, A. G., Birch, S. P. D., Dietrich, W. E., et al. 2017, Geophysical Research Letters, 44, 11,745, doi: 10.1002/2017GL075468

    2017 doi

  60. [68]

    M., Chappell, J., Dietrich, W

    Heimsath, A. M., Chappell, J., Dietrich, W. E., Nishiizumi, K., & Finkel, R. C. 2000, Geology, 4

    2000

  61. [69]

    M., Dietrich, W

    Heimsath, A. M., Dietrich, W. E., Nishiizumi, K., & Finkel, R. C. 1997, Nature, 388, 358, doi: 10.1038/41056

    1997 doi

  62. [70]

    2013, Nature, 500, 550, doi: 10.1038/nature12400

    Hemingway, D., Nimmo, F., Zebker, H., & Iess, L. 2013, Nature, 500, 550, doi: 10.1038/nature12400

    2013 doi

  63. [71]

    D., Hayes, A

    Hofgartner, J. D., Hayes, A. G., Lunine, J. I., et al. 2014, Nature Geoscience, 7, 493, doi: 10.1038/ngeo2190 —. 2016, Icarus, 271, 338, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2016.02.022

    2014 doi

  64. [72]

    D., Hayes, A

    Hofgartner, J. D., Hayes, A. G., Campbell, D. B., et al. 2020, Nature Communications, 11, 2829, doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16663-1

    2020 doi

  65. [73]

    Howard, A. D. 2007, Geomorphology, 91, 332, doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2007.04.017 —. 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 17245, doi: 10.1073/pnas.0910005106

    2007 doi

  66. [74]

    D., Breton, S., & Moore, J

    Howard, A. D., Breton, S., & Moore, J. M. 2016, Icarus, 270, 100, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2015.05.034

    2016 doi

  67. [75]

    D., & Moore, J

    Howard, A. D., & Moore, J. M. 2008, Geophysical Research Letters, 35, doi: 10.1029/2007GL032618

    2008 doi

  68. [76]

    L., Perron, J

    Huppert, K. L., Perron, J. T., & Ashton, A. D. 2020, Geology, 48, 499, doi: 10.1130/G47113.1

    2020 doi

  69. [77]

    H., Stephan, K., et al

    Jaumann, R., Brown, R. H., Stephan, K., et al. 2008, Icarus, 197, 526, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2008.06.002

    2008 doi

  70. [78]

    E., Cottini, V., Nixon, C

    Jennings, D. E., Cottini, V., Nixon, C. A., et al. 2016, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 816, L17, doi: 10.3847/2041-8205/816/1/L17

    2016 doi

  71. [79]

    E., Tokano, T., Cottini, V., et al

    Jennings, D. E., Tokano, T., Cottini, V., et al. 2019, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 877, L8, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab1f91

    2019 doi

  72. [80]

    F., Whitmire, D

    Kasting, J. F., Whitmire, D. P., & Reynolds, R. T. 1993, Icarus, 101, 108, doi: 10.1006/icar.1993.1010

    1993

  73. [81]

    Krasnopolsky, V. A. 2010, Planetary and Space Science, 58, 1507, doi: 10.1016/j.pss.2010.07.010

    2010 doi

  74. [82]

    P., Dietrich, W

    Lamb, M. P., Dietrich, W. E., Aciego, S. M., DePaolo, D. J., & Manga, M. 2008, Science, 320, 1067, doi: 10.1126/science.1156630 24

    2008 doi

  75. [83]

    P., Howard, A

    Lamb, M. P., Howard, A. D., Dietrich, W. E., & Perron, J. T. 2007, Geological Society of America Bulletin, 119, 805, doi: 10.1130/B25986.1

    2007 doi

  76. [84]

    P., Howard, A

    Lamb, M. P., Howard, A. D., Johnson, J., et al. 2006, Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 111, doi: 10.1029/2005JE002663

    2006 doi

  77. [85]

    P., & Venditti, J

    Lamb, M. P., & Venditti, J. G. 2016, Geophysical Research Letters, 43, 3777, doi: 10.1002/2016GL068713

    2016 doi

  78. [86]

    H., Jaumann, R., Stephan, K., et al

    Langhans, M. H., Jaumann, R., Stephan, K., et al. 2012, Planetary and Space Science, 60, 34, doi: 10.1016/j.pss.2011.01.020 Lapˆ otre, M. G. A., Ielpi, A., Lamb, M. P., Williams, R. M. E., & Knoll, A. H. 2019, Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 124, 2757, doi: 10....

    2012 doi

  79. [87]

    B., & Maddock, T

    Leopold, L. B., & Maddock, T. 1953, The Hydraulic Geometry of Stream Channels and Some Physiographic Implications (U.S. Government Printing Office)

    1953

  80. [88]

    L., Zygielbaum, B

    Litwin, K. L., Zygielbaum, B. R., Polito, P. J., Sklar, L. S., & Collins, G. C. 2012, Journal of Geophysical Research (Planets), 117, E08013, doi: 10.1029/2012JE004101

    2012 doi

  81. [89]

    Lopes, R. M. C., Malaska, M. J., Solomonidou, A., et al. 2016, Icarus, 270, 162, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2015.11.034

    2016 doi

  82. [90]

    Lopes, R. M. C., Malaska, M. J., Schoenfeld, A. M., et al. 2020, Nature Astronomy, 4, 228, doi: 10.1038/s41550-019-0917-6

    2020 doi

  83. [91]

    M., Battalio, J

    Lora, J. M., Battalio, J. M., Yap, M., & Baciocco, C. 2022, Icarus, 115095, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2022.115095

    2022

  84. [92]

    M., Lunine, J

    Lora, J. M., Lunine, J. I., Russell, J. L., & Hayes, A. G. 2014, Icarus, 243, 264, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2014.08.042

    2014 doi

  85. [93]

    M., & ´Ad´ amkovics, M

    Lora, J. M., & ´Ad´ amkovics, M. 2017, Icarus, 286, 270, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2016.10.012

    2017 doi

  86. [94]

    Lorenz, R. D. 1994, Planetary and Space Science, 42, 1, doi: 10.1016/0032-0633(94)90134-1 —. 2014, Geophysical Research Letters, 41, 5764, doi: 10.1002/2014GL061133

    1994 doi

  87. [95]

    D., & Lunine, J

    Lorenz, R. D., & Lunine, J. I. 1996, Icarus, 122, 79, doi: 10.1006/icar.1996.0110

    1996

  88. [96]

    D., Lopes, R

    Lorenz, R. D., Lopes, R. M., Paganelli, F., et al. 2008, Planetary and Space Science, 56, 1132, doi: 10.1016/j.pss.2008.02.009

    2008 doi

  89. [97]

    Lunine, J. I. 1993, Reviews of Geophysics, 31, 133, doi: 10.1029/92RG02794

    1993 doi

  90. [98]

    I., & Atreya, S

    Lunine, J. I., & Atreya, S. K. 2008, Nature Geoscience, 1, 159, doi: 10.1038/ngeo125

    2008 doi

  91. [99]

    M., & Barnes, J

    MacKenzie, S. M., & Barnes, J. W. 2016, The Astrophysical Journal, 821, 17, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/821/1/17

    2016 doi

  92. [100]

    M., Barnes, J

    MacKenzie, S. M., Barnes, J. W., Sotin, C., et al. 2014, Icarus, 243, 191, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2014.08.022

    2014 doi

  93. [101]

    M., Barnes, J

    MacKenzie, S. M., Barnes, J. W., Hofgartner, J. D., et al. 2019, Nature Astronomy, 3, 506, doi: 10.1038/s41550-018-0687-6

    2019 doi

  94. [102]

    M., Birch, S

    MacKenzie, S. M., Birch, S. P. D., H¨ orst, S., et al. 2021, The Planetary Science Journal, 2, 112, doi: 10.3847/PSJ/abf7c9

    2021 doi

  95. [103]

    2011, in Lunar and Planetary Inst

    Malaska, M., Radebaugh, J., Le Gall, A., et al. 2011, in Lunar and Planetary Inst. Technical Report, Vol. 42, Lunar and Planetary Science Conference, 1562

    2011

  96. [104]

    J., Hodyss, R., Lunine, J

    Malaska, M. J., Hodyss, R., Lunine, J. I., et al. 2017, Icarus, 289, 94, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2017.01.033

    2017 doi

  97. [105]

    J., Lopes, R

    Malaska, M. J., Lopes, R. M., Williams, D. A., et al. 2016, Icarus, 270, 130, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2016.02.021

    2016 doi

  98. [106]

    J., Radebaugh, J., Lopes, R

    Malaska, M. J., Radebaugh, J., Lopes, R. M., et al. 2020, Icarus, 344, 113764, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2020.113764

    2020

  99. [107]

    C., & Carr, M

    Malin, M. C., & Carr, M. H. 1999, Nature, 397, 589, doi: 10.1038/17551

    1999 doi

  100. [108]

    2016, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 54, 5646, doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2016.2563426

    Mastrogiuseppe, M., Hayes, A., Poggiali, V., et al. 2016, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 54, 5646, doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2016.2563426

    2016

  101. [109]

    G., et al

    Mastrogiuseppe, M., Poggiali, V., Hayes, A. G., et al. 2018a, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 496, 89, doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2018.05.033 —. 2019, Nature Astronomy, 3, 535, doi: 10.1038/s41550-019-0714-2

    2018 doi

  102. [110]

    2014, Geophysical Research Letters, 41, 1432, doi: 10.1002/2013GL058618

    Mastrogiuseppe, M., Poggiali, V., Hayes, A., et al. 2014, Geophysical Research Letters, 41, 1432, doi: 10.1002/2013GL058618

    2014 doi

  103. [111]

    2018b, Icarus, 300, 203, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2017.09.009

    Mastrogiuseppe, M., Hayes, A., Poggiali, V., et al. 2018b, Icarus, 300, 203, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2017.09.009

    2017 doi

  104. [112]

    2022, Icarus, 375, 114831, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2021.114831

    Nathan, E. 2022, Icarus, 375, 114831, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2021.114831

    2022

  105. [113]

    E., Hodyss, R., Cable, M

    Maynard-Casely, H. E., Hodyss, R., Cable, M. L., Vu, T. H., & Rahm, M. 2016, IUCrJ, 3, 192, doi: 10.1107/S2052252516002815

    2016 doi

  106. [114]

    P., Rover, J

    McDonald, C. P., Rover, J. A., Stets, E. G., & Striegl, R. G. 2012, Limnology and Oceanography, 57, 597, doi: 10.4319/lo.2012.57.2.0597

    2012 doi

  107. [115]

    2016, Icarus, 270, 57, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2015.09.043

    Michaelides, R., Hayes, A., Mastrogiuseppe, M., et al. 2016, Icarus, 270, 57, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2015.09.043

    2016 doi

  108. [116]

    W., Birch, S

    Miller, J. W., Birch, S. P. D., Hayes, A. G., et al. 2021, The Planetary Science Journal, 2, 142, doi: 10.3847/PSJ/ac0245

    2021 doi

  109. [117]

    L., & Lora, J

    Mitchell, J. L., & Lora, J. M. 2016, Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 44, 353, doi: 10.1146/annurev-earth-060115-012428 25

    2016 doi

  110. [118]

    L., Barmatz, M

    Mitchell, K. L., Barmatz, M. B., Jamieson, C. S., Lorenz, R. D., & Lunine, J. I. 2015, Geophysical Research Letters, 42, 1340, doi: 10.1002/2014GL059475

    2015 doi

  111. [119]

    I., Mastrogiuseppe, M., & Poggiali, V

    Mitri, G., Lunine, J. I., Mastrogiuseppe, M., & Poggiali, V. 2019, Nature Geoscience, 12, 791, doi: 10.1038/s41561-019-0429-0

    2019 doi

  112. [120]

    J., Harrison, T

    Mojzsis, S. J., Harrison, T. M., & Pidgeon, R. T. 2001, Nature, 409, 178, doi: 10.1038/35051557

    2001 doi

  113. [121]

    M., Howard, A

    Moore, J. M., Howard, A. D., & Morgan, A. M. 2014, Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 119, 2060, doi: 10.1002/2014JE004608

    2014 doi

  114. [122]

    I., & Sotin, C

    Mousis, O., Choukroun, M., Lunine, J. I., & Sotin, C. 2014, Icarus, 239, 39, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2014.05.032

    2014 doi

  115. [123]

    2019, Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 124, 2381, doi: 10.1029/2018JF004971 National Academies of Sciences, E., & Medicine

    Naito, K., & Parker, G. 2019, Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 124, 2381, doi: 10.1029/2018JF004971 National Academies of Sciences, E., & Medicine. 2022,

    2019 doi

  116. [124]

    Origins, Worlds, and Life: A Decadal Strategy for Planetary Science and Astrobiology 2023-2032 (The National Academies Press), doi: 10.17226/26522

    2023 doi

  117. [125]

    2016, Icarus, 270, 114, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2015.07.022

    Neish, C., Molaro, J., Lora, J., et al. 2016, Icarus, 270, 114, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2015.07.022

    2016 doi

  118. [126]

    D., & Lorenz, R

    Neish, C. D., & Lorenz, R. D. 2012, Planetary and Space Science, 60, 26, doi: 10.1016/j.pss.2011.02.016 —. 2014, Icarus, 228, 27, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2013.09.024

    2012 doi

  119. [127]

    H., Ashton, A

    Nienhuis, J. H., Ashton, A. D., Edmonds, D. A., et al. 2020, Nature, 577, 514, doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1905-9

    2020 doi

  120. [128]

    H., Wonsuck, K., G.A., M., et al

    Nienhuis, J. H., Wonsuck, K., G.A., M., et al. 2022, Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 51, doi: 10.1146/annurev-earth-031621-093732

    2022 doi

  121. [129]

    A., Lorenz, R

    Nixon, C. A., Lorenz, R. D., Achterberg, R. K., et al. 2018, Planetary and Space Science, 155, 50, doi: 10.1016/j.pss.2018.02.009

    2018 doi

  122. [130]

    2008, Geophysical Research Letters, 35, L18202, doi: 10.1029/2008GL035216

    Paillou, P., Lunine, J., Ruffi´ e, G., et al. 2008, Geophysical Research Letters, 35, L18202, doi: 10.1029/2008GL035216

    2008 doi

  123. [131]

    V., Perron, J

    Palermo, R. V., Perron, J. T., Soderblom, J. M., et al. 2022, Science Advances

    2022

  124. [132]

    Perron, J. T. 2017, Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 45, 561, doi: 10.1146/annurev-earth-060614-105405

    2017 doi

  125. [133]

    T., Kirchner, J

    Perron, J. T., Kirchner, J. W., & Dietrich, W. E. 2009, Nature, 460, 502, doi: 10.1038/nature08174

    2009 doi

  126. [134]

    T., Lamb, M

    Perron, J. T., Lamb, M. P., Koven, C. D., et al. 2006, Journal of Geophysical Research, 111, E11001, doi: 10.1029/2005JE002602

    2006 doi

  127. [135]

    T., Richardson, P

    Perron, J. T., Richardson, P. W., Ferrier, K. L., & Lapˆ otre, M. 2012, Nature, 492, 100, doi: 10.1038/nature11672

    2012 doi

  128. [136]

    2021, Quaternary Science Reviews, 254, 106797, doi: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2021.106797

    Pfeiffer, M., Morgan, A., Heimsath, A., et al. 2021, Quaternary Science Reviews, 254, 106797, doi: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2021.106797

    2021

  129. [137]

    G., Mastrogiuseppe, M., et al

    Poggiali, V., Hayes, A. G., Mastrogiuseppe, M., et al. 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 125, e2020JE006558, doi: 10.1029/2020JE006558

    2020 doi

  130. [138]

    G., et al

    Poggiali, V., Mastrogiuseppe, M., Hayes, A. G., et al. 2016, GRL, 43, 7887, doi: 10.1002/2016GL069679 —. 2019, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 57, 7262, doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2019.2912575

    2016

  131. [139]

    W., & Vail, P

    Posamentier, H. W., & Vail, P. R. 1988, in Sea-Level Changes: An Integrated Approach, ed. C. K. Wilgus, B. S. Hastings, H. Posamentier, J. V. Wagoner, C. A. Ross, & C. G. S. C. Kendall, Vol. 42 (SEPM Society for Sedimentary Geology), 0, doi: 10.2110/pec.88.01.0125

    1988 doi

  132. [140]

    2011, Icarus, 211, 672, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2010.07.022

    Radebaugh, J., Lorenz, R., Wall, S., et al. 2011, Icarus, 211, 672, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2010.07.022

    2011 doi

  133. [141]

    D., et al

    Radebaugh, J., Ventra, D., Lorenz, R. D., et al. 2016, in

    2016

  134. [142]

    & Clarke, L

    Ventra, D. & Clarke, L. E. (eds). Geology and Geomorphology of Alluvial and Fluvial Fans: Terrestrial and Planetary Perspectives, SP440, The Geological Society, doi: 10.1144/SP440.6

    doi

  135. [143]

    Rafkin, S. C. R., & Soto, A. 2020, Icarus, 351, 113903, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2020.113903

    2020

  136. [144]

    W., Perron, J

    Richardson, P. W., Perron, J. T., & Schurr, N. D. 2019, Geology, 47, 423, doi: 10.1130/G45305.1

    2019 doi

  137. [145]

    L., Roe, H

    Schaller, E. L., Roe, H. G., Schneider, T., & Brown, M. E. 2009, Nature, 460, 873, doi: 10.1038/nature08193

    2009 doi

  138. [146]

    Perron, J. T. 2022, Planetary Science Journal

    2022

  139. [147]

    M., Lopes, R

    Schoenfeld, A. M., Lopes, R. M., Malaska, M. J., et al. 2021, Icarus, 366, 114516, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2021.114516

    2021

  140. [148]

    B., Combe, J.-P., et al

    Singh, S., McCord, T. B., Combe, J.-P., et al. 2016, The Astrophysical Journal, 828, 55, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/828/1/55

    2016 doi

  141. [149]

    S., & Dietrich, W

    Sklar, L. S., & Dietrich, W. E. 2004, Water Resources Research, 40, doi: 10.1029/2003WR002496

    2004 doi

  142. [150]

    A., Tomasko, M

    Soderblom, L. A., Tomasko, M. G., Archinal, B. A., et al. 2007, Planetary and Space Science, 55, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.pss.2007.04.015

    2007 doi

  143. [151]

    A., Brown, R

    Soderblom, L. A., Brown, R. H., Soderblom, J. M., et al. 2009, Icarus, 204, 610, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2009.07.033

    2009 doi

  144. [152]

    2020, Icarus, 344, 113338, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2019.05.040

    Solomonidou, A., Le Gall, A., Malaska, M., et al. 2020, Icarus, 344, 113338, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2019.05.040

    2020 doi

  145. [153]

    2022, Journal of Geophysical Research (Planets)

    Solomonidou, A., Schoenfeld, A., Malaska, M., et al. 2022, Journal of Geophysical Research (Planets)

    2022

  146. [154]

    K., Soderblom, J

    Steckloff, J. K., Soderblom, J. M., Farnsworth, K. K., et al. 2020, The Planetary Science Journal, 1, 26, doi: 10.3847/PSJ/ab974e

    2020 doi

  147. [155]

    2010, Geophysical Research Letters, 37, doi: 10.1029/2009GL042312 26

    Stephan, K., Jaumann, R., Brown, R., et al. 2010, Geophysical Research Letters, 37, doi: 10.1029/2009GL042312 26

    2010 doi

  148. [156]

    R., Elachi, C., Lunine, J

    Stofan, E. R., Elachi, C., Lunine, J. I., et al. 2007, Nature, 445, 61, doi: 10.1038/nature05438

    2007 doi

  149. [157]

    T., Ford, P., Miller, S., & Black, B

    Tewelde, Y., Perron, J. T., Ford, P., Miller, S., & Black, B. 2013, Journal of Geophysical Research (Planets), 118, 2198, doi: 10.1002/jgre.20153

    2013 doi

  150. [158]

    1990, Icarus, 86, 336, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0019-1035(90)90224-W

    Thompson, W., & Squyres, S. 1990, Icarus, 86, 336, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0019-1035(90)90224-W

    1990 doi

  151. [159]

    I., & Sotin, C

    Tobie, G., Lunine, J. I., & Sotin, C. 2006, Nature, 440, 61, doi: 10.1038/nature04497

    2006 doi

  152. [160]

    2010, Ocean Dynamics, 60, 803, doi: 10.1007/s10236-010-0285-3 —

    Tokano, T. 2010, Ocean Dynamics, 60, 803, doi: 10.1007/s10236-010-0285-3 —. 2020, Geophysical Research Letters, 47, e2019GL086166, doi: 10.1029/2019GL086166

    2010 doi

  153. [161]

    2015, Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 120, 20, doi: 10.1002/2014JE004751 —

    Tokano, T., & Lorenz, R. 2015, Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 120, 20, doi: 10.1002/2014JE004751 —. 2016, Icarus, 270, 67, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2015.08.033

    2015 doi

  154. [162]

    P., Neubauer, F

    Tokano, T., McKay, C. P., Neubauer, F. M., et al. 2006, Nature, 442, 432, doi: 10.1038/nature04948

    2006 doi

  155. [163]

    G., Archinal, B., Becker, T., et al

    Tomasko, M. G., Archinal, B., Becker, T., et al. 2005, Nature, 438, 765, doi: 10.1038/nature04126

    2005 doi

  156. [164]

    G., Pavlov, A

    Trainer, M. G., Pavlov, A. A., DeWitt, H. L., et al. 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103, 18035, doi: 10.1073/pnas.0608561103

    2006 doi

  157. [165]

    P., Perry, J

    Turtle, E. P., Perry, J. E., Hayes, A. G., & McEwen, A. S. 2011a, Icarus, 212, 957, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2011.02.005

    2011 doi

  158. [166]

    P., Perry, J

    Turtle, E. P., Perry, J. E., McEwen, A. S., et al. 2009, Geophysical Research Letters, 36, n/a, doi: 10.1029/2008GL036186

    2009 doi

  159. [167]

    P., Perry, J

    Turtle, E. P., Perry, J. E., Hayes, A. G., et al. 2011b, Science, 331, 1414, doi: 10.1126/science.1201063

    doi

  160. [168]

    P., Perry, J

    Turtle, E. P., Perry, J. E., Barbara, J. M., et al. 2018, Geophysical Research Letters, 45, 5320, doi: 10.1029/2018GL078170

    2018 doi

  161. [169]

    2018, Icarus, 310, 105, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2017.12.018

    Vincent, D., Karatekin, O., Lambrechts, J., et al. 2018, Icarus, 310, 105, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2017.12.018

    2018 doi

  162. [170]

    W., Jackson, B., et al

    Vixie, G., Barnes, J. W., Jackson, B., et al. 2015, Icarus, 257, 313, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2015.05.009

    2015 doi

  163. [171]

    Maynard-Casely, H. E. 2020, Geophysical Research Letters, 47, e2019GL086265, doi: 10.1029/2019GL086265

    2020 doi

  164. [172]

    Neish, C. D. 2022, The Planetary Science Journal, 3, 50, doi: 10.3847/PSJ/ac4e91

    2022 doi

  165. [173]

    2010, Geophysical Research Letters, 37, n/a, doi: 10.1029/2009GL041821

    Wall, S., Hayes, A., Bristow, C., et al. 2010, Geophysical Research Letters, 37, n/a, doi: 10.1029/2009GL041821

    2010 doi

  166. [174]

    A., Valley, J

    Wilde, S. A., Valley, J. W., Peck, W. H., & Graham, C. M. 2001, Nature, 409, 175, doi: 10.1038/35051550

    2001 doi

  167. [175]

    2022, Science, 377, doi: 10.1126/science.abn1234

    Wisdom, J., Dbouk, R., Militzer, B., et al. 2022, Science, 377, doi: 10.1126/science.abn1234

    2022 doi

  168. [176]

    G., & Miller, John, P

    Wolman, M. G., & Miller, John, P. 1960, Geology, 68, 54

    1960

  169. [177]

    2013, Lunar and Planetary SCience Conference 44, Abstract 1764

    Wood, C., Stofan, E., Hayes, A., et al. 2013, Lunar and Planetary SCience Conference 44, Abstract 1764

    2013

  170. [178]

    A., & Radebaugh, J

    Wood, C. A., & Radebaugh, J. 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 125, e2019JE006036, doi: 10.1029/2019JE006036

    2020 doi

  171. [179]

    C., Zebker, H

    Wye, L. C., Zebker, H. A., & Lorenz, R. D. 2009, Geophysical Research Letters, 36, doi: 10.1029/2009GL039588

    2009 doi

  172. [180]

    M., He, C., & McGuiggan, P

    Yu, X., H¨ orst, S. M., He, C., & McGuiggan, P. 2020, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 530, 115996, doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2019.115996

    2020

  173. [181]

    S., Nghiem, J., Lamb, M

    Zeichner, S. S., Nghiem, J., Lamb, M. P., et al. 2021, Science, 371, 526, doi: 10.1126/science.abd0379

    2021 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.