Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 9 minor 2 cited by

Brillouin-Induced Kerr Frequency Comb in normal dispersion fiber Fabry Perot resonators

T0 review · 2 major / 9 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Stimulated Brillouin scattering can seed a 10 THz Kerr frequency comb in a normal-dispersion fiber cavity.

desk verdict A credible experimental and numerical demonstration that SBS can act as a phase-matching partner in a normal-dispersion fiber FP cavity, selecting a sideband nine FSRs away from the pump; the main caveat is that the load-bearing SBS term in Eq. (1) is derived only in the missing supplement. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.03037 v1 pith:DQGWHM4F submitted 2025-02-05 physics.optics nlin.PS

Thomas Bunel , Julien Lumeau , Antonin Moreau , Arnaud Fernandez , Olivier Llopis , Germain Bourcier , Auro Perego , Matteo Conforti
show 1 more author
Arnaud Mussot
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.opticsnlin.PS PACS 42.65.Es42.60.Da
keywords Brillouin-KerrfrequencycombfiberFabry-PerotresonatornormaldispersionstimulatedBrillouinscatteringswitchingwavesmodelockingLugiato-Lefeverequationoptical
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports a new kind of optical frequency comb: a continuous-wave laser pumping a normal-dispersion fiber Fabry-Perot resonator produces a stable, mode-locked comb spanning more than 10 THz with a 10.58 GHz line spacing, exactly nine times the cavity's free spectral range. The central claim is that stimulated Brillouin scattering (SBS), although its gain curve overlaps almost nothing with the selected cavity mode, acts as both the trigger and the phase-matching partner for the Kerr effect. Without SBS, the paper argues, the continuous pump would sit stably on the upper bistability branch and no comb would form. With it, the pump is converted into switching waves whose steep fronts broaden the spectrum into hundreds of phase-locked teeth. If true, this turns a usually parasitic effect into a deliberate design resource for compact, connectorized comb sources in the normal dispersion regime.

What carries the argument

The engine of the argument is a generalized mean-field equation, Eq. (1), adapted to a Fabry-Perot cavity and extended with a nonlocal stimulated-Brillouin term. The SBS enters through a periodic convolution $\varphi=\psi\ast h_B$ of the intracavity field with the Brillouin response function $h_B$, whose Fourier transform is the complex Brillouin susceptibility; this brings in both the resonant gain and the real refractive-index phase that the electrostrictive index modulation imposes by causality. A linear stability analysis of the constant (CW) solution yields the parametric gain $g(\omega_n)$ in Eq. (6) and the phase-mismatch $\mu_n$ in Eq. (7), and the phase-matching condition $\mu=0$ gives the maximum-gain frequency $\omega_{\max}$ in Eq. (10). These equations show that the real part of the SBS term shifts the phase-matching frequency so the parametric gain band peaks near 10 GHz and overlaps the discrete cavity resonances N=8 to N=11, with N=9 receiving the largest gain. That is what selects the repetition rate and explains why the comb runs at nine times the FSR rather than at the mode with the largest ordinary SBS gain.

What would settle it

Measure the comb repetition rate and spectrum while scanning the cavity length (or FSR) across the range 1.15 GHz to 1.4 GHz: the paper predicts mode hopping from N=9 to N=8 as the FSR passes about 1.22 GHz, then back to N=9 near 1.3 GHz. A second check is to run the same model with the real part of the SBS response artificially set to zero; the explanation requires the 10.58 GHz comb to disappear or change spacing when that phase contribution is removed, while ordinary SBS gain alone should not reproduce the observed repetition rate.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The discovery is that SBS can select the comb's repetition rate even when the SBS gain peak lies between cavity resonances and is closer to a different mode than the one that actually oscillates. In the authors' 8.75 cm fiber Fabry-Perot cavity, the Brillouin shift is 9.655 GHz with a roughly 50 MHz linewidth, while the FSR is 1.176 GHz; the gain curve sits between the 8th and 9th resonances, closer to the 8th, yet the generated comb runs at 10.58 GHz, the 9th multiple. The paper explains this through a linear stability analysis of a generalized mean-field equation that couples the Kerr and Brillouin nonlinearities: the SBS gain adds both an imaginary amplification part and a real refractive-index part. That real part compensates the pump-to-sideband phase mismatch at a frequency near the Brillouin shift, creating a broad parametric gain band whose maximum, combined with the discrete cavity resonances, lands on N=9. Once this sideband grows, it modulates the pump at exactly nine FSRs, and in the normal-dispersion bistable regime the modulation evolves into almost square switching waves, producing the broadband comb.

Load-bearing premise

The whole explanation rests on the generalized mean-field equation Eq. (1) being an accurate model of the coherent Kerr-Brillouin dynamics in the Fabry-Perot cavity; if the nonlocal SBS coupling term or its causality-imposed phase contribution is wrong or incomplete, the predicted N=9 selection and the derived phase-matching condition collapse.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The comb repetition rate is set by an integer multiple of the FSR chosen by the parametric gain maximum, not by the SBS gain peak, so cavity length and Brillouin shift jointly determine the achievable GHz spacings.
  • In the normal dispersion regime, SBS can serve as a self-starting trigger for switching-wave combs under pure CW pumping, removing the need for pulsed pumps or mode-crossing tricks.
  • Comb bandwidth can be tuned by changing fiber dispersion, because dispersion mainly moves the switching-wave shoulders while the teeth spacing stays fixed.
  • The platform gives microresonator-like quality factors (Q around 69 million) in a fiber Fabry-Perot package with standard FC/PC connectors.
  • The same mechanism should work in other normal-dispersion resonators whenever the parametric gain band overlaps a higher-order cavity resonance, not only at N=9.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • By extension, engineering the Brillouin gain linewidth or shift (through fiber composition, strain, or temperature) could tune the comb repetition rate in steps of the FSR without changing the cavity length.
  • The paper's FSR scan suggests a generic phase diagram in the (FSR, pump power) plane: broad parametric combs appear when the parametric band overlaps a resonance away from the SBS peak, while narrow cascaded combs appear when a resonance sits on the SBS peak; this distinction could be tested systematically.
  • Because the threshold power $P_{th}=\alpha/(2\gamma L)$ equals the conventional modulational-instability threshold, the SBS-Kerr interaction may change the accessible operating branch rather than lower the fundamental power threshold; a dedicated power-dependence measurement would clarify this.
  • The broader idea that a parasitic nonlinearity can supply the missing phase for perfect phase matching might extend to other resonantly enhanced nonlinearities, such as Raman or electro-optic effects, in normal-dispersion cavities.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 9 minor

Summary. The paper reports the generation of a broadband optical frequency comb in a normal-dispersion fiber Fabry-Perot resonator with a repetition rate of 10.58 GHz, equal to nine times the cavity FSR. The authors propose that stimulated Brillouin scattering, although its gain spectrum lies between the 8th and 9th cavity resonances with no direct overlap, acts as a trigger and as a phase-matching partner through the real (Kramers-Kronig) part of the SBS susceptibility. A generalized mean-field equation with a nonlocal SBS term is introduced, a linear stability analysis predicts maximum parametric gain at N=9, and numerical simulations reproduce the experimental spectra and time traces at three detunings. The paper claims a new passive mode-locking mechanism for ultra-broadband comb generation.

Significance. If the mechanism is correct, this is an original and interesting contribution: it shows that a normally avoided effect (SBS) can be exploited in a regime where it overlaps no cavity resonance, and that its reactive part can mediate phase matching in normal dispersion, leading to switching-wave combs whose repetition rate is set by the cavity FSR rather than by the SBS gain peak. The experiments are convincing in their essentials: three detunings show the evolution from a narrow comb to a 10 THz span, time traces display square-wave pulses, and the beatnotes are narrow. The numerics appear to match the experimental spectra well. The main weaknesses are that the derivation of the governing equation, in particular the nonlocal SBS term and its reactive part, is deferred to an unavailable supplement, and that the role of the real part of the SBS susceptibility is not isolated numerically. Reproducibility is also limited by the 'available upon request' data and code policy.

major comments (2)
  1. [Methods, Eq. (1), and 'Supplemental Information'] The derivation of the generalized mean-field equation, including the nonlocal SBS term phi = psi * h_B and the Kramers-Kronig phase of H_B, is deferred to supplementary information that is not provided with the manuscript. Because the central claim that SBS selects N=9 rests on the exact form and sign of the real part of H_B, please include this derivation in the main text or make the supplement available to reviewers, and add a control calculation with the real part of H_B set to zero (or its sign inverted) to confirm that the N=9 gain maximum in Fig. 4(a) indeed arises from the reactive SBS term. Without such a check, the stability analysis could be an artifact of the assumed model.
  2. [Fig. 4(a) and Eqs. (6)-(9)] The paper attributes the N=9 selection to the real part of the SBS susceptibility, but no calculation is shown that decomposes the parametric gain into separate contributions from Re(H_B), Im(H_B), and the Kerr effect. The purple curve in Fig. 4(a) is described as the gain 'without the SBS gain contribution,' which is ambiguous because it appears to include the real part while omitting the imaginary part. Please show gain spectra computed with only the imaginary part of H_B and with only the real part of H_B, demonstrating that the N=9 mode wins only when the real part is included; this would directly support the phase-matching mechanism claimed in the Introduction.
minor comments (9)
  1. [Results B, first paragraph, and Fig. 2(c)] The normalized detunings Delta = 6.04, 8.08, and 10.74 for delta = 0.057, 0.059, and 0.083 are inconsistent with alpha = pi/F = 0.00748 for F=420, which would give Delta ~ 7.6, 7.9, and 11.1; please clarify the definition of alpha or correct the values.
  2. [Eq. (8)] The denominator in the expression for g_Br(omega) should be (Omega_B^2 - omega^2)^2 + (Gamma_B omega)^2, not (Omega_B^2 - omega^2) + (Gamma_B omega)^2 as written.
  3. [Fig. 2 caption and main text] The beatnote FWHM values are given as 1 kHz, 4 Hz, and 150 Hz in the caption of Fig. 2, but as 4 kHz, 1 kHz, and 0.15 kHz in the main text; please reconcile these values.
  4. [References [40] and [42]] Reference [40] is incomplete, missing the unit '%' and journal details, and the author list of reference [42] appears malformed; please correct both entries.
  5. [Fig. 1 caption and Table I] The sign of beta3 is positive in the Fig. 1 caption (0.00273 ps^3/km) but negative in Table I (-0.00273 ps^3/km); please specify the correct sign.
  6. [Fig. 5 and its caption] The text assigns FSR = 1.22 GHz to Fig. 5(d) and FSR = 1.3 GHz to Fig. 5(c), whereas the caption assigns (c) to 1.22 GHz and (d) to 1.3 GHz; please correct the cross-references.
  7. [Eq. (7)] The notation '2L beta2/2' in the dispersion term is ambiguous; please use parentheses or a consistent prefactor to indicate whether the term is L beta2 omega^2 or 2L (beta2/2) omega^2.
  8. [Throughout] There are several typos and awkward phrasings, including 'to to match' (Introduction), 'An good agreement' (Results B), and 'The very high stable feature of this optical frequency comb' (Abstract); a careful proofreading pass is recommended.
  9. [Data and code availability] The statements 'Data are available upon request' and 'Codes are available upon request' limit reproducibility; if the journal policy allows, consider depositing data and code in a public repository.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

The N=9 selection follows from an independently parameterized linear stability analysis; no fitted quantity is renamed as a prediction, and self-citations are contextual rather than load-bearing.

full rationale

The central derivation chain is: the observed 10.58 GHz comb is explained by the generalized mean-field equation Eq. (1); linearizing Eq. (1) around the CW solution gives the gain spectrum Eq. (6) with mismatch Eq. (7); the condition mu=0 leads to the phase-matching frequency Eq. (10); evaluating the gain on the cavity modes selects N=9. None of the parameters entering this chain is fitted to the comb repetition rate: the FSR, finesse, beta2, gamma, and Brillouin gain/linewidth/shift in Table I are measured or taken from independent fiber characterization [40], and the pump power and detuning are experimental operating points. Eq. (10) is the analytic solution of the phase-matching condition, not an ansatz set equal to the observed 10.58 GHz; the observed repetition rate is then compared with the gain maximum, and the N=9 mode wins because the broad SBS-Kerr gain band peaks near it while the SBS gain peak (near N=8) does not overlap a resonance. The prediction-versus-fit pattern is therefore not present. The derivation of Eq. (1) is deferred to supplemental information, which is an omitted proof but not a circular reduction, since the SBS term is a standard damped-oscillator response with a Kramers-Kronig real part rather than a term defined to reproduce N=9. Self-citations appear for FFP resonator context [38,39], for the switching-wave shoulder prediction [42], and for beyond-mean-field theory [55]; these are supporting or contextual, and the temporal square-wave traces and the stability calculation provide independent evidence for the central claim. Accordingly, no circular step is established; the circularity burden is low, and the paper is self-contained against external benchmarks.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

All numerical constants in Table I are measured or taken from the cited literature; the analysis introduces no fitted free parameter and no new physical entity. The auxiliary field phi in Eq. (2) is a mathematical convolution, not a new physical object.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The generalized mean-field equation Eq. (1) with the SBS coupling term describes the FP cavity field evolution.
    Invoked in Methods, Eq. (1); derivation is only in supplementary information, so the reader must take this model as given.
  • domain assumption Brillouin response is a damped Lorentzian oscillator with parameters Omega_B, Gamma_B, g_B taken from prior measurements [40].
    Used in Eq. (7)-(10) for the phase-matching and gain analysis; the Kramers-Kronig real part is essential to the mechanism.
  • domain assumption The cavity remains locked on the upper branch of the bistable curve and the homogeneous CW solution is the appropriate base state for linear stability analysis.
    Required for the switching-wave interpretation and for computing the parametric gain in Fig. 4; stated in Results B and Eq. (5).
  • domain assumption Higher-order effects such as Raman scattering, thermal drift, and mode competition are negligible for the central mechanism.
    The model and experiment rely on Kerr and SBS only; the paper notes mode competition can appear at other FSRs (Fig. 5) but does not include it.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Brillouin-Induced Kerr Frequency Comb in normal dispersion fiber Fabry Perot resonators." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DQGWHM4F

@misc{pith2026250203037,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Brillouin-Induced Kerr Frequency Comb in normal dispersion fiber Fabry Perot resonators},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DQGWHM4F}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.03037}
}
read the original abstract

We report the generation of a stable, broadband frequency comb, covering more than 10 THz, using a normal dispersion fiber Fabry-Perot resonator with a high quality factor of 69 millions. This platform ensures robust and easy integration into photonic devices via FC/PC connectors, and feature quality factors comparable to those of microresonators. We demonstrate a passive mode-locking phenomenon induced by the coherent interaction of the Kerr effect and Brillouin scattering, which generates a frequency comb with a repetition rate exceeding the free spectral range of the cavity. This parametric process modulates the continuous wave (CW) pump and can then be transformed into a train of almost square-wave pulses thanks to the generation of switching waves. Our results are supported by advanced numerical simulations, and theoretical derivations that include the Brillouin effect in the Fabry-Perot configuration. The very high stable feature of this optical frequency comb lying in the GHz range is critical to several applications ranging from telecommunication, spectroscopy and advanced microwave generation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.03037 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Experimental setup. (b) Measured cavity transfer function (FSR = 1.176 GHz and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a), (b) and (d) : Experimental (light blue lines) and numerical results (circles in (a) and violet and green curves in (b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (a)-(b) Time traces corresponding to Figs. 2 (a) and (d) detunings ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Parametric gain curves from theoretical predictions (green curve Eq.(6)) for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) 2D plot illustrating the evolution of the parametric gain as a function of the FSR of the cavity and the corresponding [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Experimental observation of self-frequency-shifting Raman quasi-solitons in a fiber Fabry-Perot resonator

    physics.optics 2025-05 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    Pulse-pumped fiber Fabry-Perot resonators in the weak normal dispersion regime generate self-frequency-shifting Raman quasi-solitons, experimentally identified via dispersive Fourier transform.

  2. Fast and accurate modelling of Kerr-Brillouin combs in Fabry-Perot resonators

    physics.optics 2025-04 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new mean-field model, a Fabry-Perot Lugiato-Lefever equation with a nonlocal Brillouin response, reproduces coupled-wave simulations of Kerr-Brillouin combs while speeding up computation by up to four orders of magnitude.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    T. J. Kippenberg, A. L. Gaeta, M. Lipson, and M. L. Gorodetsky, Dissipative Kerr solitons in optical microres- onators, Science 361, eaan8083 (2018)

    2018

  2. [2]

    Pasquazi, M

    A. Pasquazi, M. Peccianti, L. Razzari, D. J. Moss, S. Coen, M. Erkintalo, Y. K. Chembo, T. Hansson, S. Wabnitz,P. Del’Haye, X. Xue, A. M. Weiner, and R. Morandotti, Micro-combs: A novel generation of optical sources, Physics Reports 729, 1 (2018)

    work page 2018

  3. [3]

    Fu ¨lo¨p, M

    A. Fu ¨lo¨p, M. Mazur, A. Lorences-Riesgo, B. Helgason, P.-H. Wang, Y. Xuan, D. E. Leaird, M. Qi, P. A. An- drekson,A. M. Weiner, and V. Torres-Company, High-order coherent communications using mode-locked dark-pulse Kerr combs from microresonators, Nature Communications 9, 1598 (2018)

    work page 2018

  4. [4]

    Suh, Q.-F

    M.-G. Suh, Q.-F. Yang, K. Y. Yang, X. Yi, and K. J. Vahala, Microresonator soliton dual-comb spectroscopy, Science 354, 600 (2016)

    work page 2016

  5. [5]

    Riemensberger, A

    J. Riemensberger, A. Lukashchuk, M. Karpov, W. Weng, E. Lucas, J. Liu, and T. J. Kippenberg, Massively parallel coherent laser ranging using a soliton microcomb, Nature 581, 164 (2020)

    2020

  6. [6]

    Huang, J

    S.-W. Huang, J. Yang, M. Yu, B. H. McGuyer, D.-L. Kwong, T. Zelevinsky, and C. W. Wong, A broadband chip-scale optical frequency synthesizer at 2.7 × 10 16 relative uncertainty, Science Advances 2, e1501489 (2016)

    work page 2016

  7. [7]

    J. Li, H. Lee, and K. J. Vahala, enMicrowave synthesizer using an on-chip Brillouin oscillator, Nature Communi- 8 cations 4, 2097 (2013), number: 1 Publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    work page 2013

  8. [8]

    Fortier and E

    T. Fortier and E. Baumann, en20 years of developments in optical frequency comb technology and applications, Commu- nications Physics 2, 1 (2019)

    work page 2019

Show all 55 references
  1. [9]

    S. A. Diddams, K. Vahala, and T. Udem, Optical frequency combs: Coherently uniting the electromagnetic spec- trum, Science 369, 3676 (2020)

    2020

  2. [10]

    Y. Sun, J. Wu, M. Tan, X. Xu, Y. Li, R. Morandotti, A. Mitchell, and D. J. Moss, Applications of optical microcombs, Advances in Optics and Photonics 15, 86 (2023)

    2023

  3. [11]

    F. Leo, S. Coen, P. Kockaert, S.-P. Gorza, P. Emplit, and M. Haelterman, Temporal cavity solitons in one- dimensional Kerr media as bits in an all-optical buffer, Nature Photonics 4, 471 (2010)

    2010

  4. [12]

    T. Herr, V. Brasch, J. D. Jost, C. Y. Wang, N. M. Kondratiev, M. L. Gorodetsky, and T. J. Kippenberg, Temporal solitons in optical microresonators, Nature Photonics 8, 145 (2014)

    2014

  5. [13]

    Englebert, C

    N. Englebert, C. Mas Arab ´ı, P. Parra-Rivas, S.-P. Gorza, and F. Leo, Temporal solitons in a coherently driven active resonator, Nature Photonics 15, 536 (2021)

    2021

  6. [14]

    Brasch, E

    V. Brasch, E. Lucas, J. D. Jost, M. Geiselmann, and T. J. Kippenberg, enSelf-referenced photonic chip soliton Kerr frequency comb, Light: Science Applications 6, e16202 (2017)

    2017

  7. [15]

    X. Xue, Y. Xuan, Y. Liu, P.-H. Wang, S. Chen, J. Wang, D. E. Leaird, M. Qi, and A. M. Weiner, Mode-locked dark pulse Kerr combs in normal-dispersion microresonators, Nature Photonics 9, 594 (2015)

    2015

  8. [16]

    X. Xue, M. Qi, and A. M. Weiner, Normal-dispersion microresonator Kerr frequency combs, Nanophotonics 5, 244 (2016)

    2016

  9. [17]

    Q.-X. Ji, W. Jin, L. Wu, Y. Yu, Z. Yuan, W. Zhang, M. Gao, B. Li, H. Wang, C. Xiang, J. Guo, A. Feshali, M. Paniccia,V. S. Ilchenko, A. B. Matsko, J. E. Bowers, and K. J. Vahala, Engineered zero-dispersion microcombs using CMOS-ready photonics, Optica 10, 279 (2023)

    2023

  10. [18]

    Liu, S.-W

    H. Liu, S.-W. Huang, W. Wang, J. Yang, M. Yu, D.-L. Kwong, P. Colman, and C. W. Wong, Stimulated gener- ation of deterministic platicon frequency microcombs, Photonics Research 10, 1877 (2022)

    2022

  11. [19]

    S.-P. Yu, E. Lucas, J. Zang, and S. B. Papp, enA continuum of bright and dark-pulse states in a photonic-crystal resonator, Nature Communications 13, 3134 (2022), publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    2022

  12. [20]

    Parra-Rivas, D

    P. Parra-Rivas, D. Gomila, E. Knobloch, S. Coen, and L. Gelens, Origin and stability of dark pulse Kerr combs in normal dispersion resonators, Optics Letters 41, 2402 (2016)

    2016

  13. [21]

    Kobyakov, M

    A. Kobyakov, M. Sauer, and D. Chowdhury, Stimulated Brillouin scattering in optical fibers, Advances in Optics and Photonics 2, 1 (2010)

    2010

  14. [22]

    Y. Bai, M. Zhang, Q. Shi, S. Ding, Y. Qin, Z. Xie, X. Jiang, and M. Xiao, Brillouin-Kerr Soliton Frequency Combs in an Optical Microresonator, Physical Review Letters 126, 063901 (2021), publisher: American Physical Society

    2021

  15. [23]

    T. F. S. Bu¨ttner, M. Merklein, I. V. Kabakova, D. D. Hudson, D.-Y. Choi, B. Luther-Davies, S. J. Madden, and B. J. Eggleton, ENPhase-locked, chip-based, cascaded stimulated Brillouin scattering, Optica 1, 311 (2014), publisher: Optica Publishing Group

    2014

  16. [24]

    T. F. S. Bu ¨ttner, I. V. Kabakova, D. D. Hudson, R. Pant, C. G. Poulton, A. C. Judge, and B. J. Eggleton, enPhase-locking and Pulse Generation in Multi-Frequency Brillouin Oscillator via Four Wave Mixing, Scientific Re- ports 4, 5032 (2014), number: 1 Publisher: Nature Publis...

    2014

  17. [25]

    Asano, Y

    M. Asano, Y. Takeuchi, S. K. Ozdemir, R. Ikuta, L. Yang, N. Imoto, and T. Yamamoto, ENStimulated Brillouin scattering and Brillouin-coupled four-wave-mixing in a silica microbottle resonator, Optics Express 24, 12082 (2016), publisher: Optica Publishing Group

    2016

  18. [26]

    Gundavarapu, G

    S. Gundavarapu, G. M. Brodnik, M. Puckett, T. Huffman, D. Bose, R. Behunin, J. Wu, T. Qiu, C. Pinho, N. Chauhan, J. Nohava, P. T. Rakich, K. D. Nelson, M. Salit, and D. J. Blumenthal, enSub-hertz fundamental linewidth photonic integrated Brillouin laser, Nature Photonics 13, 6...

    2019

  19. [27]

    Zhang, S

    H. Zhang, S. Zhang, T. Bi, G. Ghalanos, Y. Zhang, H. Yan, A. Pal, J. He, S. Pan, and P. Del Haye, Microresonator soliton frequency combs via cascaded Brillouin scattering (2023), arXiv:2312.15506 [physics]

    2023 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Lucas, M

    E. Lucas, M. Deroh, and B. Kibler, Dynamic Interplay Between Kerr Combs and Brillouin Lasing in Fiber Cavi- ties, Laser Photonics Reviews , 2300041 (2023)

    2023

  21. [29]

    Huang, Q

    Y. Huang, Q. Li, J. Han, Z. Jia, Y. Yu, Y. Yang, J. Xiao, J. Wu, D. Zhang, Y. Huang, W. Qin, and G. Qin, ENTem- poral soliton and optical frequency comb generation in a Brillouin laser cavity, Optica 6, 1491 (2019), pub- lisher: Optica Publishing Group

    2019

  22. [30]

    Danion, L

    G. Danion, L. Frein, D. Bacquet, G. Pillet, S. Molin, L. Morvan, G. Ducournau, M. Vallet, P. Szriftgiser, and M. Alouini, ENMode-hopping suppression in long Brillouin fiber laser with non-resonant pumping, Optics Letters 41, 2362 (2016), publisher: Optica Publishing Group

    2016

  23. [31]

    Nishimoto, K

    K. Nishimoto, K. Minoshima, K. Minoshima, T. Yasui, N. Kuse, and N. Kuse, ENThermal control of a Kerr microresonator soliton comb via an optical sideband, Optics Letters 47, 281 (2022), publisher: Optica Publishing Group

    2022

  24. [32]

    Zhang, J

    S. Zhang, J. M. Silver, L. D. Bino, F. Copie, M. T. M. Woodley, G. N. Ghalanos, A. Svela, N. Moroney, and P. 9 Del’Haye, ENSub-milliwatt-level microresonator solitons with extended access range using an auxiliary laser, Optica 6, 206 (2019), publisher: Optica Publishing Group

    2019

  25. [33]

    M. Nie, K. Jia, Y. Xie, S. Zhu, Z. Xie, and S.-W. Huang, Synthesized spatiotemporal mode-locking and photonic flywheel in multimode mesoresonators, Nat Commun 13, 6395 (2022)

    2022

  26. [34]

    K. Jia, X. Wang, D. Kwon, J. Wang, E. Tsao, H. Liu, X. Ni, J. Guo, M. Yang, X. Jiang, J. Kim, S.-n. Zhu, Z. Xie, and S.-W. Huang, Photonic Flywheel in a Monolithic Fiber Resonator, Physical Review Letters 125, 143902 (2020)

    2020

  27. [35]

    M. Nie, J. Musgrave, K. Jia, J. Bartos, S. Zhu, Z. Xie, and S.-W. Huang, enTurnkey photonic flywheel in a microresonator- filtered laser, Nature Communications 15, 55 (2024), number: 1 Publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    2024

  28. [36]

    Z. Xiao, T. Li, M. Cai, H. Zhang, Y. Huang, C. Li, B. Yao, K. Wu, and J. Chen, Near-zero-dispersion soliton and broadband modulational instability Kerr microcombs in anomalous dispersion, Light: Science Applications 12, 33 (2023)

    2023

  29. [37]

    Obrzud, S

    E. Obrzud, S. Lecomte, and T. Herr, Temporal solitons in microresonators driven by optical pulses, Nature Pho- tonics 11, 600 (2017)

    2017

  30. [38]

    Bunel, M

    T. Bunel, M. Conforti, Z. Ziani, J. Lumeau, A. Moreau, A. Fernandez, O. Llopis, J. Roul, A. M. Perego, K. K. Y. Wong, and A. Mussot, Observation of modulation instability Kerr frequency combs in a fiber Fabry–P´erot resonator, Optics Letters 48, 275 (2023)

    2023

  31. [39]

    Bunel, M

    T. Bunel, M. Conforti, Z. Ziani, J. Lumeau, A. Moreau, A. Fernandez, O. Llopis, G. Bourcier, and A. Mussot, 28 THz soliton frequency comb in a continuous-wave pumped fiber Fabry–P ´erot resonator, APL Photonics 9, 010804 (2024)

    2024

  32. [40]

    Deroh, B

    M. Deroh, B. Kibler, H. Maillotte, T. Sylvestre, and J.-C. Beugnot, ENLarge Brillouin gain in Germania-doped core optical fibers up to a 98mol

  33. [41]

    Malaguti, G

    S. Malaguti, G. Bellanca, and S. Trillo, Dispersive wave-breaking in coherently driven passive cavities, Optics Letters 39, 2475 (2014)

    2014

  34. [42]

    C. M. L. J. Bunel, Thomas, A. Moreau, and A. Mussot, Switching waves-induced broadband kerr frequency comb in fiber fabry-perot resonators, arXiv:2402.09777 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  35. [43]

    X. Xue, Y. Xuan, P.-H. Wang, Y. Liu, D. E. Leaird, M. Qi, and A. M. Weiner, Normal-dispersion microcombs enabled by controllable mode interactions, Laser Photonics Reviews 9, L23 (2015)

    2015

  36. [44]

    Z. Xiao, K. Wu, H. Zhang, T. Li, M. Cai, Y. Huang, and J. Chen, Modeling the Kerr Comb of a Pulse Pumped F-P Microresonator With Normal Dispersion, Journal of Lightwave Technology 41, 7408 (2023)

    2023

  37. [45]

    T. Li, K. Wu, X. Zhang, M. Cai, and J. Chen, Experimental observation of stimulated Raman scattering enabled localized structure in a normal dispersion FP resonator, Optica 10, 1389 (2023)

    2023

  38. [46]

    Macnaughtan, M

    M. Macnaughtan, M. Erkintalo, S. Coen, S. Murdoch, and Y. Xu, Temporal characteristics of stationary switching waves in a normal dispersion pulsed-pump fiber cavity, Optics Letters 48, 4097 (2023)

    2023

  39. [47]

    Y. Xu, A. Sharples, J. Fatome, S. Coen, M. Erkintalo, and S. G. Murdoch, Frequency comb generation in a pulse-pumped normal dispersion Kerr mini-resonator, Optics Letters 46, 512 (2021)

    2021

  40. [48]

    M. H. Anderson, W. Weng, G. Lihachev, A. Tikan, J. Liu, and T. J. Kippenberg, Zero dispersion Kerr solitons in optical microresonators, Nature Communications 13, 4764 (2022)

    2022

  41. [49]

    L. A. Lugiato and R. Lefever, Spatial Dissipative Structures in Passive Optical Systems, Physical Review Letters 58, 2209 (1987)

    1987

  42. [50]

    D. C. Cole, A. Gatti, S. B. Papp, F. Prati, and L. Lugiato, Theory of Kerr frequency combs in Fabry-Perot resonators, Physical Review A 98, 013831 (2018)

    2018

  43. [51]

    Agrawal, EnglishNonlinear Fiber Optics, Fifth Edition, 5th ed

    G. Agrawal, EnglishNonlinear Fiber Optics, Fifth Edition, 5th ed. (Academic Press, Amsterdam, 2012)

    2012

  44. [52]

    Haelterman, S

    M. Haelterman, S. Trillo, and S. Wabnitz, Dissipative modulation instability in a nonlinear dispersive ring cavity, Optics Communications 91, 401 (1992)

    1992

  45. [53]

    Coen and M

    S. Coen and M. Haelterman, enCompetition between modulational instability and switching in optical bistability, Optics Letters 24, 80 (1999)

    1999

  46. [54]

    Agrawal, Nonlinear Fiber Optics (Academic Press, 2007)

    G. Agrawal, Nonlinear Fiber Optics (Academic Press, 2007)

    2007

  47. [55]

    Ziani, T

    Z. Ziani, T. Bunel, A. M. Perego, A. Mussot, and M. Conforti, Theory of modulation instability in Kerr Fabry- Perot resonators beyond the mean-field limit, Physical Review A 109, 013507 (2024), publisher: American Physical Society. METHODS Experimental setup. The Fabry-Perot c...

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.