Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 53 references

Altermagnetic spin splitting and symmetry-enforced partial spin degeneracy in hexagonal MnTe

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper establishes that in hexagonal MnTe, magnetic space-group symmetry keeps electron bands spin-degenerate on the $k_z=0$ and $k_y=0$ planes while allowing spin splitting everywhere else except specific nodal lines, and captures…

desk verdict Solid MSG-based map of altermagnetic splitting in MnTe, but the nodal-line enumeration is incomplete and the abstract overclaims if the missing stabilizers are real. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.03088 v1 pith:4SO2KOY2 submitted 2025-02-05 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.str-el

Suman Rooj , Nirmal Ganguli This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.str-el
keywords altermagnetismMnTespinsplittingmagneticspacegroupdegeneracynodallinesmodelHamiltoniandensityfunctionaltheory
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper establishes that the altermagnetic spin splitting in hexagonal MnTe is not uniform: the magnetic space group forces electron bands to remain doubly spin-degenerate across two entire planes of the Brillouin zone, $k_z=0$ and $k_y=0$, while splitting is allowed everywhere else except a small set of nodal lines. It derives this pattern from the magnetic space group $P6'_3/m'mc'$ and writes a single symmetry-adapted term, $\alpha\sigma_z k_y k_z(3k_x^2-k_y^2)$, that reproduces where bands split and where they stay degenerate. A sympathetic reader would care because this explains in symmetry terms why this well-studied semiconductor behaves partly like a conventional antiferromagnet and partly like an altermagnet, and it provides a compact model for future spintronics and magnon work.

What carries the argument

The central machinery is the magnetic space group $P6'_3/m'mc'$ of A-type MnTe together with the symmetry-adapted Hamiltonian $H=H_0+\alpha\sigma_z k_y k_z(3k_x^2-k_y^2)$. The antiunitary operations of the magnetic space group that leave a $k$-vector invariant while reversing spin enforce degeneracy, and the subset that leaves a $k$-point in a given plane identifies the nodal lines. The tensor $\sigma_z k_y k_z(3k_x^2-k_y^2)$ is the only spin-dependent invariant up to fourth order allowed by the group generators, so this single term carries the entire spin-splitting pattern.

What would settle it

A spin-resolved angle-resolved photoemission experiment on a single-domain MnTe crystal that resolves the full three-dimensional Brillouin zone would settle it: observing spin splitting anywhere on the $k_z=0$ or $k_y=0$ planes, or failing to find the predicted nodes (for example $k_y=0$, $k_z=0$, or $k_y=\pm\sqrt{3}k_x$ in a constant-$k_z$ plane), would contradict the central claim. A measurement of a net magnetization in a single-domain sample with the easy axis along $[11\bar{2}0]$ would contradict the no-weak-ferromagnetism result.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central result is that MnTe in its A-type antiferromagnetic state with magnetic space group $P6'_3/m'mc'$ has spin degeneracy enforced by antiunitary symmetries only in the $k_z=0$ and $k_y=0$ planes; in every other plane, generic $k$-points host spin-split bands, with symmetry-enforced degeneracy remaining only along specific nodal lines (in the $k_z=\text{constant}\neq0$ planes at $u=v$, $u=-2v$, $v=-2u$, and in other planes at $k_z=0$ and $k_x=0$ or $k_y=0$ conditions). The effective two-band Hamiltonian $H=H_0+\alpha\sigma_z k_y k_z(3k_x^2-k_y^2)$, obtained from the theory of invariants under the magnetic space group, reproduces this splitting and degeneracy pattern qualitatively. Including spin-orbit interaction, the easy axis along $[11\bar{2}0]$ gives magnetic space group $Cmcm$ with fully compensated moments, so no weak ferromagnetism appears in the DFT results; the paper proposes that reported weak ferromagnetism and the anomalous Hall effect may arise from an alternative spin quantization direction or a mixture of magnetic space groups.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that MnTe's true magnetic ground state is the A-type collinear antiferromagnetic order with the assumed spin quantization axis and magnetic space group $P6'_3/m'mc'$; if the moments cant, rotate to another axis, or form multiple domains, the enforced degeneracy planes and nodal lines shift or disappear.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Because the degeneracies are enforced by antiunitary symmetry operations of the magnetic space group $P6'_3/m'mc'$, they hold for every band, not just the pair examined in the DFT band structure.
  • The model eigenvalues $\varepsilon_\pm(\mathbf{k}) = \varepsilon_0(\mathbf{k}) \pm \alpha k_y k_z(3k_x^2-k_y^2)$ put nodes exactly where the factor vanishes: the whole $k_y=0$ and $k_z=0$ planes are degenerate, and in a constant-$k_z$ plane only the three lines $k_y=0$ and $k_y=\pm\sqrt{3}k_x$ survive.
  • The same magnetic symmetry governs magnon states, so the predicted pattern of split and degenerate bands should be reflected in chiral magnons in MnTe.
  • With the easy axis along $[11\bar{2}0]$, the spin-orbit-corrected magnetic space group $Cmcm$ permits no net moment, so the altermagnetic phase is fully compensated; reported weak ferromagnetism and the anomalous Hall effect then require an alternative spin quantization direction or a mixture of magnetic domains.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: the same antiunitary-operation analysis can be applied directly to other hexagonal A-type antiferromagnets with the same magnetic space group, making the two-degenerate-planes-plus-nodal-lines pattern a symmetry fingerprint to look for in isostructural compounds.
  • Beyond the paper: a practical consequence is that spin-transport and spin-splitter-torque signals in MnTe should vanish for geometries confined to the $k_y=0$ or $k_z=0$ planes, and follow the $3k_x^2-k_y^2$ angular dependence elsewhere; this can be tested in device measurements.
  • Beyond the paper: the paper's spin-orbit discussion suggests that detwinning a single-domain MnTe crystal should suppress the weak ferromagnetism and first-order anomalous Hall response attributed to mixed magnetic space groups, providing a concrete experimental check.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies altermagnetic spin splitting in hexagonal MnTe using DFT and magnetic space group (MSG) analysis. The authors assign the MSG P6'3/m'mc' for the A-type antiferromagnetic order, identify full spin degeneracy in the kz=0 and ky=0 planes, derive a symmetry-adapted model Hamiltonian H = H0 + alpha sigma_z k_y k_z (3 k_x^2 - k_y^2), and use it to describe the splitting pattern. They also discuss the effect of spin-orbit interaction and argue that no weak ferromagnetism is present in their DFT ground state.

Significance. If the nodal-line enumeration were complete, the paper would provide a valuable parameter-free symmetry characterization of altermagnetic spin degeneracy in MnTe, with a simple model Hamiltonian fixed by symmetry rather than fitted to DFT. The DFT results are used only as corroboration, so the symmetry argument is independent of the computational details. However, the claimed completeness of the nodal-line set is not achieved as presented, which directly affects the central claim in the abstract.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. IV.C.4 and Table III] The identification of symmetry-enforced nodal lines is incomplete because the analysis in Secs. IV.C.2-IV.C.4 considers only antiunitary operations that leave an entire plane invariant, whereas a k-point degeneracy only requires an antiunitary operation that stabilizes that individual k-point. For instance, in a v=constant plane the operation T{2_1-10|0 0 1/2} maps (u,v,w) to (v,u,w); at u=v it stabilizes every such k-point, so the line u=v (i.e., ky=sqrt(3) kx) is symmetry-enforced in every v=constant plane, yet Table III lists only kz=0 and kx=-pi/a v for these planes. The same omission occurs for kx=constant and ky=constant planes, which additionally contain the nodal lines ky=±sqrt(3) kx (the u=v and v=-2u lines from Eq. (10)). The model Hamiltonian (Eq. 27) has zeros precisely on ky=0, kz=0, and ky=±sqrt(3) kx, so the model is consistent with the full set, but the symmetry enumeration in the manuscript is not. As a result, the abstract's claim that spin-splitting is observed everywhere else in the Brillouin zone except the identified nodal lines is not supported by the paper's own symmetry analysis.
  2. [Sec. IV.C.2-IV.C.4 and Figs. 5-6] Because the enumeration is incomplete, the DFT discussion misclassifies symmetry-enforced degeneracies as accidental. In Sec. IV.C.2, the nodes seen in Fig. 5(b) and 5(c) beyond ky=0 and kz=0 are called "not protected by symmetry"; however, some of these lie on the missed lines ky=±sqrt(3) kx and are therefore symmetry-enforced. The same applies to the additional degeneracies in v=constant planes discussed in Sec. IV.C.4 and Fig. 6. The manuscript should recompute which of the observed nodes fall on the complete set of nodal lines before labeling any of them accidental.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. IV.C.1] The text states that Eq. (10) implies degeneracy at "six points in the kx-ky plane"; in fact the conditions u=v, u=-2v, and v=-2u define three full lines in the plane, and the six points are the intersections of these lines with the isoenergetic contours at a given energy. Please clarify this topology.
  2. [Introduction] The phrase "highly-persued" should be "highly pursued".
  3. [Sec. III] The paper does not report convergence tests for the DFT calculations (e.g., k-point mesh, energy cutoff, and Ueff dependence). A brief convergence statement would strengthen the quantitative claims regarding the band gap and the magnetic moment.
  4. [Table II] The column heading "GAU (Antiunitary) = T (G − GU)" is confusing; consider simplifying it to a straightforward list of antiunitary operations.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the degeneracy planes and nodal lines follow from magnetic space group theory and are compared with DFT, while the symmetry-adapted Hamiltonian is fixed by invariants rather than fitted.

full rationale

The central claims are derived independently of the data they explain. The kz=0 and ky=0 degeneracy planes and the kz-constant nodal lines follow from antiunitary operations of the magnetic space group P6'3/m'mc' (Sec. IV.C, Eqs. (3)-(26), Table II), and the DFT isoenergetic contours are used as checks, not as inputs to the symmetry argument. The effective Hamiltonian Eq. (27) is obtained by enumerating irreducible tensor operators under the MSG generators (Table IV); its coefficient alpha is not fitted to the DFT bands, and Appendix C only uses a free-electron H0 for qualitative comparison of the nodal pattern. Self-citations [4] and [5] supply the SCAN+U+rVV10 computational setup and prior altermagnetism methodology, but the symmetry-enforced degeneracy result is not imported from them, so these citations are not load-bearing. The main caveat is a correctness issue, not circularity: the nodal enumeration considers antiunitary operations that leave entire planes invariant, so point-stabilizer nodal lines in v=constant, kx=constant, and ky=constant planes may be missed, and the statement that certain degeneracies are 'not protected by symmetry' (Sec. IV.C.2-C.4) is not backed by a full point-stabilizer check. This could make the abstract's 'everywhere else' claim overbroad, but it does not make any prediction equivalent to its input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests mainly on the assumed magnetic ground state and on standard magnetic space group theory. There are no invented physical entities. The only free parameter in the model Hamiltonian, alpha, is not fitted to data; the Hubbard U is taken from prior work. The main non-standard input is the truncation of the invariant expansion at fourth order in k.

free parameters (2)
  • alpha (model Hamiltonian coefficient) = not fitted (qualitative model)
    Coefficient of the symmetry-allowed spin-splitting term in Eq. (27). No value is derived or fitted, and it does not affect the degeneracy pattern.
  • Ueff for Mn-3d states = 3 eV (U - J)
    Hubbard correction taken from prior work (Ref. [4]). It influences the band gap and moments but not the symmetry-enforced degeneracy pattern.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption A-type collinear antiferromagnetic order with MSG P6'3/m'mc' describes MnTe in the absence of SOI.
    The degeneracy-plane analysis in Sec. IV.C is built entirely on this magnetic structure and its symmetry operations in Table II.
  • domain assumption SCAN+U+rVV10 DFT captures the relevant electronic structure and magnetic order of MnTe.
    Used to produce band structures and isoenergetic contours in Sec. III; no functional comparison or convergence tests are provided.
  • standard math Spin and orbital degrees of freedom decouple without SOI, and spin rotations act as SU(2) operations as in Eq. (2).
    Standard nonrelativistic treatment in Sec. II that lets the magnetic space group analysis be applied separately to spin.
  • ad hoc to paper The invariant expansion up to fourth order in k is sufficient to describe the spin splitting.
    Table IV and Eq. (27) retain only the listed terms; higher-order terms could modify nodal lines and are not discussed.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Altermagnetic spin splitting and symmetry-enforced partial spin degeneracy in hexagonal MnTe." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4SO2KOY2

@misc{pith2026250203088,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Altermagnetic spin splitting and symmetry-enforced partial spin degeneracy in hexagonal MnTe},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4SO2KOY2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.03088}
}
abstract

Besides hosting several intriguing physical properties, the recently discovered time-reversal-asymmetric antiferromagnets, known as altermagnets, hold immense promise for technologies based on spintronics. Understanding the symmetry conditions leading to the spin-splitting becomes the key to further progress in the field. Hexagonal MnTe emerges as an even-parity magnet within the altermagnet family. In this work, using ab initio density functional theory (DFT) within a combination of an appropriate exchange-correlation functional and the relevant corrections, we uncover the spin-splitting features of MnTe. Our calculations reveal the spin degeneracy to be preserved in the $k_z = 0$ and $k_y = 0$ planes, while spin-splitting is observed everywhere else in the Brillouin zone, except the nodal lines identified here. To explain these findings, we provide a comprehensive symmetry analysis based on magnetic space group theory and introduce an insightful symmetry-adapted model Hamiltonian that qualitatively describes the spin-splitting behavior in different parts of the Brillouin zone. Our calculations considering spin-orbit interaction reveal no weak ferromagnetism in MnTe. Nevertheless, we discuss plausible explanations for weak ferromagnetism and anomalous Hall effect reported from experiments. Our comprehensive analysis of the magnetic space group symmetry and the DFT results leads to a thorough understanding of altermagnetism in MnTe, paving the way for possible future technology.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.03088 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. The unit cell of MnTe with A-type antiferromagnetic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Spin-polarized band dispersion for MnTe from both [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. The 3D dispersions of the chosen bands in Cartesian coordinate system as functions of ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Panel (a), (b), (c) and (d), (e), (f) shows the isoenergetic contours in Cartesian coordinate system in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Panel (a), (b), (c) and (d), (e), (f) shows the isoenergetic contours in Cartesian coordinate system in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Panel (a), (b), (c) and (d), (e), (f) shows the isoenergetic contours in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. This figure illustrates the hexagonal Brillouin zone [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Panels (a) and (b) show the 3D band dispersion [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    kx-ky planes The symmetry operations in the magnetic space group (MSG) P 6′ 3/m′mc′ that leave a generic ⃗k-vector (u, v,0) in the kz = 0 plane invariant are (see Table II) {1|0} : (u, v,0) → (u, v,0) and T 2001|0 0 1 2 : (u, v,0) → (u, v,0), (3) where the ⃗k-vector is represented in the reciprocal coor- dinate system. The antiunitary operation T {2001|0 ...

    work page 2001

  2. [2]

    ky-kz planes Similar to the above, here we analyze the spin split- ting in ky-kz planes. A generic ⃗k-vector (0, v, w) in the kx = 0 plane remains invariant under the following MSG symmetry operations: {1|0} : (0, v, w) → (0, v, w) and {m100|0} : (0, v, w) → (0, v, w) (11) None of these symmetry operations connect the mag- netic sublattices with opposite ...

    work page 2001

  3. [3]

    (A7) suggests u + 2v = √ 3a 2π ky = h, a constant, yielding (18) u = h − 2v for ky = constant

    kx-kz planes A constant value of ky represent kx-kz planes in the Cartesian coordinate system, where Eq. (A7) suggests u + 2v = √ 3a 2π ky = h, a constant, yielding (18) u = h − 2v for ky = constant. (19) The antiunitary symmetry operations listed in Table II that leave a generic ⃗k-vector in ky = 2π√ 3a (u + 2v) = constant plane in the same plane (i.e., ...

    work page 2001

  4. [4]

    (26) While Eq

    v = constant planes Following the description of the reciprocal space in appendix A, if we consider a generic ⃗k-point in the v = constant planes, we identify the following antiuni- tary symmetry operations from Table II that leave the point in the same plane: T 2001|0 0 1 2 : (u, v, w) → (u, v,−w), and (25) T 2210|0 0 1 2 : (u, v, w) → (−u − v, v, w). (2...

    work page 2001

  5. [5]

    S. Rooj, S. Saxena, and N. Ganguli, Altermagnetism in the orthorhombic P nmastructure through group theory and DFT calculations, Phys. Rev. B 111, 014434 (2025)

    work page 2025

  6. [6]

    Karube, T

    S. Karube, T. Tanaka, D. Sugawara, N. Kadoguchi, M. Kohda, and J. Nitta, Observation of Spin-Splitter Torque in Collinear Antiferromagnetic RuO2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 137201 (2022)

    2022

  7. [7]

    H. Bai, L. Han, X. Y. Feng, Y. J. Zhou, R. X. Su, Q. Wang, L. Y. Liao, W. X. Zhu, X. Z. Chen, F. Pan, X. L. Fan, and C. Song, Observation of Spin Splitting Torque in a Collinear Antiferromagnet RuO2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 197202 (2022)

    2022

  8. [8]

    ˇSmejkal, A

    L. ˇSmejkal, A. Marmodoro, K.-H. Ahn, R. Gonz´ alez- Hern´ andez, I. Turek, S. Mankovsky, H. Ebert, S. W. D’Souza, O. ˇSipr, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Chiral Magnons in Altermagnetic RuO 2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 256703 (2023)

    work page 2023

Show all 53 references
  1. [9]

    S. Rooj, J. Chakraborty, and N. Ganguli, Hexagonal MnTe with Antiferromagnetic Spin Splitting and Hidden Rashba - Dresselhaus Interaction for Antiferromagnetic Spintronics, Adv. Phys. Res. 3, 2300050 (2024)

    2024

  2. [10]

    Bhowal and N

    S. Bhowal and N. A. Spaldin, Ferroically Ordered Mag- netic Octupoles in d-Wave Altermagnets, Phys. Rev. X 14, 011019 (2024)

    2024

  3. [11]

    L.-D. Yuan, Z. Wang, J.-W. Luo, E. I. Rashba, and A. Zunger, Giant momentum-dependent spin splitting in centrosymmetric low-Z antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 102, 014422 (2020)

    2020

  4. [12]

    Osumi, S

    T. Osumi, S. Souma, T. Aoyama, K. Yamauchi, A. Honma, K. Nakayama, T. Takahashi, K. Ohgushi, and T. Sato, Observation of a giant band splitting in alter- magnetic MnTe, Phys. Rev. B 109, 115102 (2024)

    2024

  5. [13]

    Krempask´ y, L

    J. Krempask´ y, L. ˇSmejkal, S. W. D’Souza, M. Ha- jlaoui, G. Springholz, K. Uhl ´ ıˇ rov´ a, F. Alarab, P. C. Constantinou, V. Strocov, D. Usanov, W. R. Pudelko, R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, A. Birk Hellenes, Z. Jansa, H. Reichlov´ a, Z. ˇSob´ aˇ n, R. D. Gonzalez Betancourt, P...

    2024

  6. [14]

    J. Liu, J. Zhan, T. Li, J. Liu, S. Cheng, Y. Shi, L. Deng, M. Zhang, C. Li, J. Ding, Q. Jiang, M. Ye, Z. Liu, Z. Jiang, S. Wang, Q. Li, Y. Xie, Y. Wang, S. Qiao, J. Wen, Y. Sun, and D. Shen, Absence of Altermagnetic Spin Splitting Character in Rutile Oxide RuO 2, Phys. Rev. Le...

    2024

  7. [15]

    ˇSmejkal, A

    L. ˇSmejkal, A. H. MacDonald, J. Sinova, S. Nakatsuji, and T. Jungwirth, Anomalous Hall antiferromagnets, Na- ture Reviews Materials 7, 482 (2022)

    2022

  8. [16]

    Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, L.ˇSmejkal, K

    R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, L.ˇSmejkal, K. V´ yborn´ y, Y. Ya- hagi, J. Sinova, T. Jungwirth, and J. ˇZelezn´ y, Effi- cient Electrical Spin Splitter Based on Nonrelativistic Collinear Antiferromagnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 127701 (2021)

    2021

  9. [17]

    R. D. Gonzalez Betancourt, J. Zub´ aˇ c, R. Gonzalez- Hernandez, K. Geishendorf, Z. ˇSob´ aˇ n, G. Springholz, K. Olejn ´ ık, L.ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, T. Jungwirth, S. T. Goennenwein, A. Thomas, H. Reichlov´ a, J.ˇZelezn´ y, and D. Kriegner, Spontaneous Anomalous Hall Effect Ari...

    2023

  10. [18]

    Z. Feng, X. Zhou, L. ˇSmejkal, L. Wu, Z. Zhu, H. Guo, R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, X. Wang, H. Yan, P. Qin, X. Zhang, H. Wu, H. Chen, Z. Meng, L. Liu, Z. Xia, J. Sinova, T. Jungwirth, and Z. Liu, An anomalous Hall effect in altermagnetic ruthenium dioxide, Nat. Electron. 5, 2520 (2022)

    2022

  11. [19]

    K. P. Kluczyk, K. Gas, M. J. Grzybowski, P. Skupi´ nski, M. A. Borysiewicz, T. F¸ as, J. Suffczy´ nski, J. Z. Do- magala, K. Grasza, A. Mycielski, M. Baj, K. H. Ahn, K. V´ yborn´ y, M. Sawicki, and M. Gryglas-Borysiewicz, Coexistence of anomalous Hall effect and weak magne- ti...

    2024

  12. [20]

    R. D. Gonzalez Betancourt, J. Zub´ aˇ c, K. Geishen- dorf, P. Ritzinger, B. R ˚ uˇ ziˇ ckov´ a, T. Kotte, J.ˇZelezn´ y, K. Olejn ´ ık, G. Springholz, B. B¨ uchner, A. Thomas, K. V´ yborn´ y, T. Jungwirth, H. Reichlov´ a, and D. Krieg- ner, Anisotropic magnetoresistance in alte...

    2024

  13. [21]

    X. Zhou, W. Feng, R. W. Zhang, L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, Y. Mokrousov, and Y. Yao, Crystal Thermal Transport in Altermagnetic RuO 2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 056701 (2024)

    2024

  14. [22]

    R. Dong, R. Cao, D. Tan, and R. Fei, Crystal Symmetry Selected Pure Spin Photocurrent in Altermagnetic Insu- lators 10.48550/arXiv.2412.09216 (2024)

    2024 doi arXiv

  15. [23]

    P. A. McClarty, A. Gukasov, and J. G. Rau, Observing Altermagnetism using Polarized Neutrons 10.48550/arXiv.2410.10771 (2024)

    2024 doi arXiv

  16. [24]

    Z. Liu, M. Ozeki, S. Asai, S. Itoh, and T. Masuda, Chiral Split Magnon in Altermagnetic MnTe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 156702 (2024)

    2024

  17. [25]

    Y. Liu, Z. Xu, L. Liu, K. Zhang, Y. Meng, Y. Sun, P. Gao, H.-W. Zhao, Q. Niu, and J. Li, Switching magnon chi- rality in artificial ferrimagnet, Nat. Commun. 13, 1264 (2022)

    2022

  18. [26]

    S. Lee, S. Lee, S. Jung, J. Jung, D. Kim, Y. Lee, B. Seok, J. Kim, B. G. Park, L. ˇSmejkal, C. J. Kang, and C. Kim, Broken Kramers Degeneracy in Altermagnetic MnTe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 036702 (2024)

    2024

  19. [27]

    Alaei, P

    M. Alaei, P. Sobieszczyk, A. Ptok, N. Rezaei, A. R. Oganov, and A. Qaiumzadeh, On the Origin of A-type Antiferromagnetism and Chiral Split Magnons in Alter- magnetic α-MnTe 10.48550/arXiv.2411.11985 (2024)

    2024 doi arXiv

  20. [28]

    S. Bey, S. S. Fields, N. G. Combs, B. G. M´ arkus, D. Beke, J. Wang, A. V. Ievlev, M. Zhukovskyi, T. Orlova, L. Forr´ o, S. P. Bennett, X. Liu, and B. A. Assaf, Un- expected Tuning of the Anomalous Hall Effect in Alter- magnetic MnTe Thin Films 10.48550/arXiv.2409.04567 (2024)

    2024 doi arXiv

  21. [29]

    A. V. Chumak, V. I. Vasyuchka, A. A. Serga, and B. Hillebrands, Magnon spintronics, Nat. Phys. 11, 453 (2015). 13

    2015

  22. [30]

    C. J. Bradley and A. P. Cracknell, The Mathematical Theory Of Symmetry In Solids(Oxford University Press, 2009)

    2009

  23. [31]

    L. Wang, L. Shen, H. Bai, H.-A. Zhou, K. Shen, and W. Jiang, Electrical Excitation and Detection of Chi- ral Magnons in a Compensated Ferrimagnetic Insulator, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 166705 (2024)

    2024

  24. [32]

    Fakhredine, R

    A. Fakhredine, R. M. Sattigeri, G. Cuono, and C. Autieri, Interplay between altermagnetism and nonsymmorphic symmetries generating large anomalous Hall conductivity by semi-Dirac points induced anticrossings, Phys. Rev. B 108, 115138 (2023)

    2023

  25. [33]

    Milivojevi´ c, M

    M. Milivojevi´ c, M. Orozovi´ c, S. Picozzi, M. Gmitra, and S. Stavri´ c, Interplay of altermagnetism and weak fer- romagnetism in two-dimensional RuF 4, 2D Mater. 11, 035025 (2024)

    2024

  26. [34]

    Devaraj, A

    N. Devaraj, A. Bose, and A. Narayan, Interplay of alter- magnetism and pressure in hexagonal and orthorhombic MnTe, Phys. Rev. Mater. 8, 104407 (2024)

    2024

  27. [35]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthm¨ uller, Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set, Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169 (1996)

    1996

  28. [36]

    L.-D. Yuan, Z. Wang, J.-W. Luo, and A. Zunger, Predic- tion of low-Z collinear and noncollinear antiferromagnetic compounds having momentum-dependent spin splitting even without spin-orbit coupling, Phys. Rev. Materials 5, 014409 (2021)

    2021

  29. [37]

    A. M. Glazer, M. I. Aroyo, and A. Authier, Seitz symbols for crystallographic symmetry operations, Acta Crystal- lographica Section A 70, 300 (2014)

    2014

  30. [38]

    M. I. Aroyo, J. M. Perez-Mato, C. Capillas, E. Kroumova, S. Ivantchev, G. Madariaga, A. Kirov, and H. Won- dratschek, Bilbao Crystallographic Server: I. Databases and crystallographic computing programs, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Kristallographie 221, 15 (2006)

    2006

  31. [39]

    M. I. Aroyo, A. Kirov, C. Capillas, J. M. Perez-Mato, and H. Wondratschek, Bilbao Crystallographic Server. II. Representations of crystallographic point groups and space groups, Acta Crystallographica Section A 62, 115 (2006)

    2006

  32. [40]

    Peng, Z.-H

    H. Peng, Z.-H. Yang, J. P. Perdew, and J. Sun, Versa- tile van der Waals Density Functional Based on a Meta- Generalized Gradient Approximation, Phys. Rev. X 6, 041005 (2016)

    2016

  33. [41]

    Kresse and D

    G. Kresse and D. Joubert, From ultrasoft pseudopoten- tials to the projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758 (1999)

    1999

  34. [42]

    P. E. Bl¨ ochl, Projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953 (1994)

    1994

  35. [43]

    J. Sun, A. Ruzsinszky, and J. Perdew, Strongly Con- strained and Appropriately Normed Semilocal Density Functional, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 036402 (2015)

    2015

  36. [44]

    S. L. Dudarev, G. A. Botton, S. Y. Savrasov, C. J. Humphreys, and A. P. Sutton, Electron-energy-loss spec- tra and the structural stability of nickel oxide: An LSDA+U study, Phys. Rev. B 57, 1505 (1998)

    1998

  37. [45]

    MAGNDATA: A Collection of magnetic structures with portable cif-type files, https://www.cryst.ehu.es/ magndata/index.php?this_label=0.800

  38. [46]

    P. E. Bl¨ ochl, O. Jepsen, and O. K. Andersen, Im- proved tetrahedron method for Brillouin-zone integra- tions, Phys. Rev. B 49, 16223 (1994)

    1994

  39. [47]

    Szuszkiewicz, E

    W. Szuszkiewicz, E. Dynowska, B. Witkowska, and B. Hennion, Spin-wave measurements on hexagonal MnTe of NiAs-type structure by inelastic neutron scat- tering, Phys. Rev. B 73, 104403 (2006)

    2006

  40. [48]

    Kriegner, H

    D. Kriegner, H. Reichlova, J. Grenzer, W. Schmidt, E. Ressouche, J. Godinho, T. Wagner, S. Y. Martin, A. B. Shick, V. V. Volobuev, G. Springholz, V. Hol´ y, J. Wunderlich, T. Jungwirth, and K. V´ yborn´ y, Magnetic anisotropy in antiferromagnetic hexagonal MnTe, Phys. Rev. B 9...

    2017

  41. [49]

    M. S. Dresselhaus, G. Dresselhaus, and A. Jorio, Group Theory: Application to the Physics of Condensed Matter (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008)

    2008

  42. [51]

    S. V. Gallego, J. M. Perez-Mato, L. Elcoro, E. S. Tasci, R. M. Hanson, K. Momma, M. I. Aroyo, and G. Madariaga, MAGNDATA: towards a database of mag- netic structures. I. The commensurate case, J. Appl. Cryst. 49, 1750 (2016)

    2016

  43. [52]

    Zhang, X.-J

    C.-P. Zhang, X.-J. Gao, Y.-M. Xie, H. C. Po, and K. T. Law, Higher-order nonlinear anomalous Hall effects in- duced by Berry curvature multipoles, Phys. Rev. B 107, 115142 (2023)

    2023

  44. [53]

    I. I. Mazin and K. D. Belashchenko, Ori- gin of the gossamer ferromagnetism in MnTe 10.48550/arXiv.2407.14389 (2024)

    2024 doi arXiv

  45. [210]

    The vector (0 0 1 2 ) represents a non-primitive translation by c/2 along the [001] direc- tion

    planes, respectively. The vector (0 0 1 2 ) represents a non-primitive translation by c/2 along the [001] direc- tion. While P 63/mmc space group preserves inversion sym- metry, all the local magnetic moments reverse their di- rection upon the PT operation. A suitable real-spa...

    2001

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.