Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 49 references

Structural dependence of quantum transport properties on topological nodal-line semimetal bilayer borophene

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The nodal line in bilayer borophene makes nanoribbon conductance oscillate with width.

desk verdict Useful Kwant transport study of bilayer borophene nanoribbons, but the analytic mode-counting formulas that are supposed to explain the oscillations contradict the paper's own conductance data. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.03296 v1 pith:IROPMM4K submitted 2025-02-05 cond-mat.mes-hall

C. J. Páez-González , C. E. Ardila-Gutiérrez , D. A. Bahamon This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords bilayerborophenenodal-linesemimetalquantumtransportnanoribbonconductancetight-bindingmodeluniaxialstrainedgestatesoscillations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to establish that the Fermi-surface topology of bilayer borophene, a nodal line rather than isolated Dirac points, leaves a distinct fingerprint in quantum transport through nanoribbons. Using a four-orbital tight-binding model fitted to ab initio bands, it argues that at zero energy the conductance increases with ribbon width and oscillates in narrow ribbons because quantized transverse momentum planes cross the nodal loop as the width changes. Edge states in hard-wall ribbons modify the fine details but do not erase the trend, and a 5% uniaxial tensile strain can shift the number of open channels in either direction. If correct, this gives a simple geometric way to estimate and strain-engineer the conductance of this two-dimensional semimetal.

What carries the argument

The central object is the nodal line: a closed loop in the two-dimensional Brillouin zone where the valence and conduction bands meet, formed by two unhybridized Dirac cones. In a nanoribbon of width $W$, transverse momentum is quantized into planes separated by $\Delta k = 2\pi/W$; each plane that intersects the nodal loop at the Fermi energy contributes one ballistic channel, so the geometry of the loop and the width together determine conductance. The argument is carried by a four-orbital ($s$, $p_x$, $p_y$, $p_z$) Slater-Koster tight-binding Hamiltonian fitted to the DFT band structure, with transport computed through scattering matrices; the fitted parameters are then reused for the strained cells. The paper's explicit formulas approximate the nodal loop as two effective trigonal loops with different widths for armchair and zigzag directions, and use floor functions to count intersecting planes.

What would settle it

Compute the zero-energy conductance of an armchair ribbon at consecutive widths n=8, 9, and 10 without periodic boundary conditions and check whether the 4G0 drop predicted when one momentum plane leaves the nodal loop appears at the same widths in a fully ab initio or experimental transport measurement; if the conductance stays flat or the drop is offset, the nodal-line counting mechanism is wrong.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central discovery is that the zero-energy conductance of bilayer borophene nanoribbons is governed by how many quantized transverse momentum planes, spaced by $\Delta k = 2\pi/W$, cut through the nodal line in the folded Brillouin zone. Each crossing supplies a channel, and because width $W$ changes the plane spacing, an armchair ribbon can gain or lose up to $4G_0$ when its width changes by one plaquette, while zigzag ribbons retain a stepwise increase because their momentum planes stay aligned with the Dirac-cone centers. The paper encodes this count in floor-function expressions built from the two trigonal-warped loops that make up the nodal line, and shows that hard-wall edges add coupled edge states in narrow ribbons without removing the width-dependent trend. It then shows that a 5% uniaxial tensile strain shifts the nodal line so that the number of available channels decreases for strain along one axis and increases for strain along the other.

Load-bearing premise

The bulk-fitted four-orbital tight-binding model is assumed to remain quantitatively valid in nanoribbons, including hard-wall edges and under 5% strain, with no independent edge- or strain-specific validation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Zero-energy conductance of bilayer borophene nanoribbons grows with width, in contrast to ribbons of Dirac-point semimetals where the conductance plateaus do not rise this way.
  • In narrow armchair ribbons, conductance at the charge neutrality point oscillates by up to $4G_0$ as one hexagonal plaquette is added, because a transverse momentum plane enters or leaves the nodal loop.
  • Zigzag ribbons show height increases in steps of $2G_0$ and $4G_0$ with plateaus, since their momentum planes remain aligned with the Dirac-cone centers.
  • Hard-wall edges create edge-state bands that are strongly coupled across the ribbon for widths $n\lesssim10$, localize at the edges for large widths, and carry current in the narrow ribbons where they overlap.
  • 5% uniaxial tensile strain is a control knob: strain along one axis reduces the number of transport channels, while strain along the other increases it, relative to pristine ribbons.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same cut-and-projection counting should apply to other two-dimensional nodal-line semimetals: the oscillation period of conductance with width encodes the diameter and warping of the nodal loop, offering a transport-based way to map the loop.
  • Because width changes of a single plaquette switch channels on and off at zero energy, a narrow ribbon could function as a width-controlled switch or sensor, and disorder or edge roughness that smears the width would blur the oscillations.
  • The anisotropic response to X- versus Y-strain implies a directional piezoresistive effect: conductance changes sign depending on whether tension is applied parallel or perpendicular to the transport direction, which can be tested with strain-dependent transport measurements.
  • In narrow ribbons, where edge states from opposite edges overlap, a magnetic field should produce a detectable signature of the hybridized edge channels; the paper does not compute this, but its current-density maps show the overlap needed for such an effect.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a four-orbital Slater-Koster tight-binding model for bilayer borophene fitted to GGA-PBE DFT band structures, then uses Kwant to compute band structures and zero-energy conductances of armchair and zigzag nanoribbons with periodic and hard-wall boundary conditions. The central claim is that the nodal line, through the quantization of transverse momentum planes, causes conductance to increase on average with width and to oscillate in narrow nanoribbons. The paper also presents analytic counting formulas for the zero-energy conductance and studies the effect of 5% uniaxial tensile strain on the number of transport channels.

Significance. The proposed cut-and-projection picture of the nodal line is a physically appealing explanation for width-dependent conductance oscillations in nodal-line semimetals, and the paper provides a transparent transport setup in Kwant. The tight-binding parameters are tabulated in full, which is useful for follow-up work. If the quantitative claims hold, the strain-induced channel engineering could be a practical tuning knob. However, the analytic formulas presented as the quantitative backbone of the nodal-line explanation are numerically inconsistent with the paper's own Kwant results, which casts doubt on the strength of the causal claim and needs to be resolved before the work can be recommended for publication.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section III.A, Eqs. (5)-(6), constants 0.4284, 0.3628, 0.2142, 0.1814] The four numerical constants in Eqs. (5)-(6) are introduced as 'effective widths of the two trigonal loops' of the nodal line, but no derivation or independent determination is given. Given that the formulas fail to reproduce the simulated conductance, these constants appear to be ad-hoc fit parameters rather than physically derived quantities. The paper should either derive these constants from the low-energy Hamiltonian of Ref. [35] or explicitly state that they are heuristic fits, and in either case they must be validated against the Kwant data.
  2. [Section IV, Table I and Fig. 12] The strained transport calculations rely on the assumption that the Slater-Koster parameters fitted to bulk DFT bands remain quantitatively valid for the edge environment and under 5% uniaxial strain. No comparison of the strained tight-binding bands to strained DFT bands is shown beyond the qualitative band-structure plots in Fig. 11, and no edge-specific validation (e.g., DFT of a strained nanoribbon) is provided. Since the strain-engineering claim is one of the paper's stated results, this missing validation is a substantial gap; at minimum the authors should show a band-structure fit quality comparison for the strained cases analogous to Fig. 2.
minor comments (4)
  1. [General] There are numerous typographical errors and spacing issues, e.g., 'theab initio' in the Introduction, 'Kw ant' in Section IV, 'Unstrainded' in Fig. 11, and missing spaces between words throughout the text; a careful proofreading pass is needed.
  2. [Figures 3 and 4] Figures 3 and 4 appear to show the same transport setup with nearly identical captions; one of them should be removed or the two should be merged to avoid duplication.
  3. [Abstract and Section V] The abstract and conclusions state that 'the nodal line causes conductance to increase with width and exhibit oscillations,' but the armchair data in Fig. 6(b) show drops as well as increases. The wording should be softened to 'is associated with' or 'correlates with' unless a causal mechanism is established beyond the counting picture.
  4. [Data Availability] The statement 'Data will be made available on request' is insufficient for a computational transport study; the authors should deposit the Kwant scripts, the TBStudio fitting inputs, and the DFT input files in a public repository to enable independent verification of the numerical results.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Kwant conductance is an independent model prediction; Eqs. (5)-(6) fail numerically but that is a correctness issue, not circularity.

full rationale

The derivation chain is DFT -> Slater-Koster tight-binding fit -> Kwant transport. The parameters in Table I are fitted to the bulk DFT band structure, not to the nanoribbon conductance, so the computed G(W) is a genuine model prediction rather than a fitted input renamed as a prediction. The nodal-line cut-and-projection argument uses the same TB model's band geometry to interpret the conductance, but the simulated conductance values are not fed back into that geometry; the argument is an interpretation of the model output, not a self-definitional reduction. The self-citations (Refs. 40-43, 47, 51) are contextual comparisons (Dirac-point bilayers, phosphorene edge bands, strained junctions) and are not load-bearing for the central claim. The main flagged issue is internal consistency, not circularity: Eqs. (5)-(6) are introduced with 'the conductance can be correctly estimated' and the constants are called 'effective widths of the two trigonal loops,' but direct evaluation using the stated d1 = 1.65 Å does not reproduce the values reported from the Kwant calculation (e.g., armchair n=8 gives 2G0 from Eq. (5) versus the text's 8G0; zigzag n=10 gives 0 from Eq. (6) while Fig. 6(b) shows nonzero conductance). This means the analytic counting model lacks the quantitative support claimed for it, and it weakens the explanatory model as presented. However, it does not make the transport calculation circular, because the Kwant result is independent of Eqs. (5)-(6). Data and code are not shipped, so independent reproducibility rests on the authors' simulation; that is a verification concern, not evidence of circularity. Overall, no significant circularity is present in the paper's derivation chain.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central results rest on a 20-parameter tight-binding fit to DFT bands (16 hoppings and 4 on-site energies for the unstrained cell) and on a geometric explanation that uses constants fitted to the same band structure. The transferability of the bulk-fitted model to edges and strained cells is assumed without independent validation. No new entities are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • Slater-Koster hopping parameters (Vssσ, Vspσ, Vppσ, Vppπ for d1-d4) = 16 values in Table I (unstrained)
    Fitted to the DFT band structure with TBStudio; they set the band dispersion and transport.
  • On-site orbital energies (εS, εPx, εPy, εPz) = 4 values in Table I
    Fitted together with the hoppings to reproduce the DFT bands.
  • Effective nodal-line loop widths c_arm1=0.4284, c_arm2=0.3628, c_zig1=0.2142, c_zig2=0.1814 = 0.4284, 0.3628, 0.2142, 0.1814
    Presented as the effective widths of the two trigonal loops of the nodal line; they are numbers matched to the fitted band structure and enter the conductance formulas (5)-(6).
  • Uniaxial tensile strain magnitude = 5% along X or Y
    Chosen as a single test value, not derived from an optimization or experimental constraint.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption DFT with GGA-PBE and a 400 eV cutoff correctly reproduces the electronic structure of bilayer borophene.
    Invoked in Section II for all band structures; no van der Waals correction is mentioned, which is a known concern for layered materials.
  • domain assumption The Slater-Koster two-center tight-binding form with s, px, py, pz orbitals can represent the low-energy bands of bilayer borophene.
    Section II.A: the fit reaches MSE 0.001 over -1 to 1 eV, but this is a fitted representation, not a proven completeness of the basis.
  • ad hoc to paper Tight-binding parameters fitted to bulk bands remain valid in nanoribbon edges and under 5% strain.
    Used in Sections III.B and IV; no independent edge or strained-cell validation is provided.
  • standard math Conductance in the ballistic limit is given by the Landauer formula with the number of open modes at the Fermi energy.
    Standard transport formalism used throughout Section III.
  • domain assumption The nodal line originates from two non-hybridizing Dirac cones with Chern number C=2.
    Taken from Refs. [35,36] and used in the geometric explanation in Section III.A.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Structural dependence of quantum transport properties on topological nodal-line semimetal bilayer borophene." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IROPMM4K

@misc{pith2026250203296,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Structural dependence of quantum transport properties on topological nodal-line semimetal bilayer borophene},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IROPMM4K}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.03296}
}
read the original abstract

This work presents the electronic and transport properties of bilayer borophene nanoribbons. In the first part, a four-orbital tight-binding model is derived by fitting the \emph{ab initio} band structure. The transport properties of armchair and zigzag bilayer borophene nanoribbons are then analyzed, both with and without periodic boundary conditions. In both scenarios, the nodal line causes conductance to increase with width and exhibit oscillations in narrow nanoribbons. Additionally, plots of current and charge density reveal that edge states have a more pronounced impact in narrower nanoribbons. Finally, uniaxial tensile strain is introduced as a tool to engineer the number of available transport channels.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.03296 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (b) presents a side view of the bilayer, revealing two interlocking honeycomb lattices connected by verti￾cal bonds. To establish an accurate model for extracting the tight￾binding parameters for BB, DFT calculations were per￾formed using Quantum ESPRESSO [44]. A supercell method with a plane-wave basis set [45] and the plane￾wave pseudopotential method were employed for struc￾tural relaxations and electronic band s… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Comparison of DFT (blue) and tight-binding (yel [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. (a) The first hexagonal Brillouin zone (black) of bi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_6.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Band structures for armchair PBC nanoribbons with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Comparative band structures for armchair [(a)–(c)] [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_7.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Current density at the Fermi energy (0 eV) for arm [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_9.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Squared wave function amplitude [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_8.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Conductance at Fermi energy as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_10.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Conductance ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_12.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 39 canonical work pages

  1. [35]

    Nakhaee, S.A

    M. Nakhaee, S.A. Ketabi, F.M. Peeters,Dirac nodal line in bilayer borophene: Tight-binding model and low-energy effective Hamiltonian, Phys. Rev. B 98 (2018) 115413. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.98.115413

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.98.115413 2018

  2. [1]

    Novoselov, A.K

    K.S. Novoselov, A.K. Geim, S.V. Morozov, D. Jiang, Y. Zhang, S.V. Dubonos, I.V. Grigorieva, A.A. Firsov, Electric Field Effect in Atomically Thin Carbon Films , Science 306 (2004) 666–669. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1102896

    doi:10.1126/science.1102896 2004

  3. [2]

    Liu, M.-X

    Z.-L. Liu, M.-X. Wang, J.-P. Xu, J.-F. Ge, G. Le Lay, P. Vogt, D. Qian, C.-L. Gao, C. Liu, J.-F. Jia, Various atomic structures of monolayer silicene fab- ricated on Ag(111), New J. Phys. 16 (2014) 075006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/16/7/075006

    work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630/16/7/075006 2014

  4. [3]

    Liu, S.B

    G. Liu, S.B. Liu, B. Xu, C.Y. Ouyang, H.Y. Song, S. Guan, S.A. Yang, Multiple Dirac Points and Hydrogenation-Induced Magnetism of Germanene Layer on Al (111) Surface, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 6 (2015) 4936–4942. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b02413

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b02413 2015

  5. [4]

    Mannix, X.F

    A.J. Mannix, X.F. Zhou, B. Kiraly, J.D. Wood, D. Alducin, B.D. Myers, X. Liu, B.L. Fisher, U. Santiago, J.R. Guest, M.J. Yacaman, A. Ponce, A.R. Oganov, M.C. Hersam, N.P. Guisinger, Syn- thesis of borophenes: Anisotropic, two-dimensional boron polymorphs , Science 350 (2015) 1513–1516. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad1080

    doi:10.1126/science.aad1080 2015

  6. [5]

    Manzeli, D

    S. Manzeli, D. Ovchinnikov, D. Pasquier, O.V. Yazyev, A. Kis, 2D transition metal dichalco- genides, Nat. Rev. Mater. 2 (2017) 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1038/natrevmats.2017.33

    doi:10.1038/natrevmats.2017.33 2017

  7. [6]

    Jackson, M

    K.A. Jackson, M. Horoi, I. Chaudhuri, T. Frauenheim, A.A. Shvartsburg,Unraveling the Shape Transformation in Silicon Clusters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 (2004) 013401. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.013401

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.93.013401 2004

  8. [9]

    Kiraly, X

    B. Kiraly, X. Liu, L. Wang, Z. Zhang, A.J. Mannix, B.L. Fisher, B.I. Yakobson, M.C. Hersam, N.P. Guisinger, Borophene Synthesis on Au(111), ACS Nano 13 (2019) 3816–3822. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.8b09339

    work page doi:10.1021/acsnano.8b09339 2019

Show all 49 references
  1. [10]

    C. Chen, H. Lv, P. Zhang, Z. Zhuo, Y. Wang, C. Ma, W. Li, X. Wang, B. Feng, P. Cheng, X. Wu, K. Wu, L. Chen, Synthesis of bilayer borophene, Nat. Chem. 14 (2022) 25–31. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-021-00813-z

    2022 doi

  2. [11]

    R. Wu, I.K. Drozdov, S. Eltinge, P. Zahl, S. Ismail-Beigi, I. Božović, A. Gozar,Large-area single-crystal sheets of borophene on Cu(111) surfaces, Nat. Nanotechnol. 14 (2019) 44–49. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-018-0317- 6

    2019 doi

  3. [12]

    Sutter, E

    P. Sutter, E. Sutter, Large-Scale Layer-by- Layer Synthesis of Borophene on Ru(0001) , Chem. Mater. 33 (2021) 8838–8843. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.1c03061. 9

    2021 doi

  4. [13]

    Zhong, K

    H. Zhong, K. Huang, G. Yu, S. Yuan, Elec- tronic and mechanical properties of few-layer borophene, Phys. Rev. B 98 (2018) 054104. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.98.054104

    2018 doi

  5. [14]

    X.-F. Zhou, X. Dong, A.R. Oganov, Q. Zhu, Y. Tian, H.-T. Wang, Semimetallic Two- Dimensional Boron Allotrope with Massless Dirac Fermions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (2014) 085502. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.085502

    2014 doi

  6. [15]

    Mohebpour, S.M

    M.A. Mohebpour, S.M. Mozvashi, S.I. Vishkayi, M.B. Tagani, Transition from metal to semiconductor by semi-hydrogenation of borophene, Phys. Rev. Mater. 6 (2022) 014012. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.6.014012

    2022 doi

  7. [16]

    X. Yan, S. Wang, Y. Sun, Y. Liu, Y. Wang, G. Yang, Semiconducting Bilayer Borophene with High Carrier Mobility, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 14 (2023) 9698–9704. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.3c02684

    2023 doi

  8. [17]

    F. Ma, Y. Jiao, G. Gao, Y. Gu, A. Bilic, Z. Chen, A. Du, Graphene-like Two-Dimensional Ionic Boron with Double Dirac Cones at Ambi- ent Condition , Nano Lett. 16 (2016) 3022–3028. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b05292

    2016 doi

  9. [18]

    Z. Pang, X. Qian, Y. Wei, R. Yang, Super- stretchable borophene , EPL 116 (2016) 36001. https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/116/36001

    2016 doi

  10. [19]

    X. Sun, X. Liu, J. Yin, J. Yu, Y. Li, Y. Hang, X. Zhou, M. Yu, J. Li, G. Tai, W. Guo,Two-Dimensional Boron Crystals: Structural Stability, Tunable Properties, Fabri- cations and Applications, Adv. Funct. Mater. 27 (2017) 1603300. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201603300

    2017 doi

  11. [20]

    N. Gao, X. Wu, X. Jiang, Y. Bai, J. Zhao, Structure and stability of bilayer borophene: The roles of hexagonal holes and interlayer bonding, FlatChem 7 (2018) 48–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flatc.2017.08.008

    2018 doi

  12. [21]

    Qureshi, Y

    A.H. Qureshi, Y. Sun, L. Wang, Y. Wang, X. Yao, X. Zhang, Bilayer Borophene Allotropes: Structural Stabilities and Electronic Properties , ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 7 (2024) 15685–15692. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.4c02724

    2024 doi

  13. [22]

    Scopel, F

    W.L. Scopel, F. Crasto de Lima, P.H. Souza, J.E. Padilha, R.H. Miwa,Bridging Borophene and Metal Sur- faces: Structural, Electronic, and Electron Transport Properties, J. Phys. Chem. C 127 (2023) 17556–17566. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.3c03123

    2023 doi

  14. [23]

    Q.-Q. Yan, T. Zhang, Y.-Y. Ma, Q. Chen, Y.-W. Mu, S.-D. Li, A bottom-up approach from medium- sized bilayer boron nanoclusters to bilayer borophene nanomaterials, Nanoscale 14 (2022) 11443–11451. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2NR02950B

    2022 doi

  15. [24]

    J. Li, Z. Zhang, C. Wang, H. Huang, B.-L. Gu, W. Duan, Topological semimetals from the perspective of first-principles calculations, J. Appl. Phys. 128 (2020) 191101. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0025396

    2020 doi

  16. [25]

    Wang, A.H

    L. Wang, A.H. Qureshi, Y. Sun, X. Xu, X. Yao, X. Zhao, A.-L. He, Y. Zhou, X. Zhang, Second-order topological insulator in Bilayer borophene, arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.10432 (2024). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2407.10432

    2024 doi

  17. [26]

    R. Yang, X. Ren, M. Sun, Optical spectra of bilayer borophene synthesized on Ag(111) film , Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 282 (2022) 121711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2022.121711

    2022

  18. [27]

    N. Gao, P. Ye, J. Chen, J. Xiao, X. Yang, Density Functional Theory Study of Bilayer Borophene- Based Anode Material for Rechargeable Lithium Ion Batteries , Langmuir 39 (2023) 10270–10279. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.3c01371

    2023 doi

  19. [28]

    Cheng, P

    M. Cheng, P. Fu, S. Chen, Giant photonic spin Hall effect in bilayer borophene metasur- faces, Opt. Express 30 (2022) 40075–40086. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.473351

    2022 doi

  20. [29]

    Soskic, J

    B.N. Soskic, J. Bekaert, C. Sevik, Ž. Šljivancanin, M.V. Milošević, First-principles exploration of su- perconductivity in intercalated bilayer borophene phases, Phys. Rev. Mater. 8 (2024) 064803. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.8.064803

    2024 doi

  21. [30]

    L. Yan, R. Ku, J. Zou, L. Zhou, J. Zhao, X. Jiang, B.-T. Wang, Prediction of superconductivity in bi- layer borophenes, RSC Adv. 11 (2021) 40220–40227. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1RA08014H

    2021 doi

  22. [31]

    Penev, A

    E.S. Penev, A. Kutana, B.I. Yakobson, Can Two-Dimensional Boron Supercon- duct?, Nano Lett. 16 (2016) 2522–2526. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b00070

    2016 doi

  23. [32]

    Y. Zhao, S. Zeng, J. Ni, Superconductivity in two- dimensional boron allotropes, Phys. Rev. B 93 (2016) 014502. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.93.014502

    2016 doi

  24. [33]

    Crasto De Lima, G.J

    F. Crasto De Lima, G.J. Ferreira, R.H. Miwa,Orbital Pseudospin-Momentum Locking in Two-Dimensional Chiral Borophene, Nano Lett. 19 (2019) 6564–6568. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b02802

    2019 doi

  25. [34]

    Gupta, A

    S. Gupta, A. Kutana, B.I. Yakobson,Dirac Cones and Nodal Line in Borophene, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 9 (2018) 2757–2762. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b00640

    2018 doi

  26. [36]

    S.-G. Xu, B. Zheng, H. Xu, X.-B. Yang, Ideal Nodal Line Semimetal in a Two-Dimensional Boron Bilayer, J. Phys. Chem. C 123 (2019) 4977–4983. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b12385

    2019 doi

  27. [37]

    Xiao, M.-C

    D. Xiao, M.-C. Chang, Q. Niu, Berry phase effects on electronic properties , Rev. Mod. Phys. 82 (2010) 1959–2007. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.82.1959

    2010 doi

  28. [38]

    Nakhaee, S.A

    M. Nakhaee, S.A. Ketabi, F.M. Peeters, Tight- Binding Studio: A technical software package to find the parameters of tight-binding Hamilto- nian, Comput. Phys. Commun. 254 (2020) 107379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2020.107379

    2020

  29. [39]

    Groth, M

    C.W. Groth, M. Wimmer, A.R. Akhmerov, X. Waintal, Kwant: a software package for quantum transport, New J. Phys. 16 (2014) 063065. https://doi.org/10.1088/1367- 2630/16/6/063065

    2014 doi

  30. [40]

    Bahamon, G

    D.A. Bahamon, G. Gómez-Santos, D.K. Efe- tov, T. Stauber, Chirality Probe of Twisted Bilayer Graphene in the Linear Transport Regime, Nano Lett. 24 (2024) 4478–4484. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c00371

    2024 doi

  31. [41]

    de Castro, J.M.V.P

    S.G. de Castro, J.M.V.P. Lopes, A. Ferreira, D.A. Bahamon, Fast Fourier-Chebyshev Ap- proach to Real-Space Simulations of the Kubo Formula, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132 (2024) 076302. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.076302. 10

    2024 doi

  32. [42]

    Páez, D.A

    C.J. Páez, D.A. Bahamon, A.L.C. Pereira, Cur- rent flow in biased bilayer graphene: Role of sublattices, Phys. Rev. B 90 (2014) 125426. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.90.125426

    2014 doi

  33. [43]

    de Castro, A

    S.G. de Castro, A. Ferreira, D.A. Bahamon, Ef- ficient Chebyshev polynomial approach to quantum conductance calculations: Application to twisted bi- layer graphene, Phys. Rev. B 107 (2023) 045418. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.107.045418

    2023 doi

  34. [44]

    Scandolo, P

    S. Scandolo, P. Giannozzi, C. Cavazzoni, S. de Gironcoli, A. Pasquarello, S. Baroni,First-principles codes for com- putational crystallography in the Quantum-ESPRESSO package, Z. Kristallogr. - Cryst. Mater. 220 (2005) 574–579. https://doi.org/10.1524/zkri.220.5.574.65062

    2005 doi

  35. [45]

    Kresse, J

    G. Kresse, J. Furthmüller,Efficiency of ab-initio total en- ergy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set, Comput. Mater. Sci. 6 (1996) 15–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0

    1996 doi

  36. [46]

    Perdew, K

    J.P. Perdew, K. Burke, M. Ernzerhof, Gen- eralized Gradient Approximation Made Sim- ple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (1996) 3865–3868. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865

    1996 doi

  37. [47]

    Páez, D.A

    C.J. Páez, D.A. Bahamon, A.L.C. Pereira, P.A. Schulz, Zigzag phosphorene nanoribbons: one-dimensional resonant channels in two-dimensional atomic crys- tals, Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 7 (2016) 1983–1990. https://doi.org/10.3762/bjnano.7.189

    2016 doi

  38. [48]

    and Ahuja, Rajeev, Strain controlled elec- tronic and transport anisotropies in two-dimensional borophene sheets, Chem

    Shukla, Vivekanand and Grigoriev, Anton and Jena, Naresh K. and Ahuja, Rajeev, Strain controlled elec- tronic and transport anisotropies in two-dimensional borophene sheets, Chem. Phys. 20 (2018) 22952-22960. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C8CP03815E

    2018 doi

  39. [49]

    X. Liu, Q. Li, Q. Ruan, M. S. Rahn, B. I. Yakob- son, and M. C. Hersam,Borophene synthesis beyond the single-atomic-layer limit, Nat. Mater. 21 (2022) 35-40. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-021-01084-2

    2022 doi

  40. [50]

    and Castro Neto, A

    Pereira, Vitor M. and Castro Neto, A. H. and Peres, N. M. R., Tight-binding approach to uniaxial strain in graphene, Phys. Rev. B. 80 (2009) 045401-045408. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.80.045401

    2009 doi

  41. [51]

    Bahamon, D. A. and Pereira, Vitor M., Conduc- tance across strain junctions in graphene nanorib- bons, Phys. Rev. B. 88 (2013) 195416-195426. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.88.195416

    2013 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.