Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 16 references

Photoemission electron microscopy of exciton-polaritons in thin WSe$_2$ waveguides

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read PEEM can measure exciton-polariton dispersion in WSe2 waveguides and extract the coupling energy.

desk verdict A promising technical demonstration of PEEM for TMDC polariton dispersions, but the headline Rabi splitting rests on a peak-tracking heuristic that needs robustness checks before being believed. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.03361 v3 pith:UWXMXJ4T submitted 2025-02-05 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Tobias Eul , Miwan Sabir , Victor DeManuel-Gonzalez , Florian Diekmann , Kai Rossnagel , Michael Bauer This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci PACS 71.36.+c79.60.-i
keywords Exciton-polaritonsWSe2PhotoemissionelectronmicroscopyWaveguidemodesStrongcouplingRabisplittingTwo-photonDispersionrelation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to establish photoemission electron microscopy (PEEM) as a direct probe of exciton-polaritons in thin transition-metal dichalcogenide waveguides. It claims that the fringes seen in two-photon photoemission images of exfoliated WSe2 flakes encode the in-plane wavevector of propagating waveguide modes, so a Fourier transform of the images yields the mode dispersion. From the lower and upper polariton branches of that dispersion the paper extracts the exciton-photon coupling strength, reporting $\Delta E = 94.8$ meV for the TE-mode polariton in a 30 nm flake. If this works, PEEM could trace polariton propagation and energy exchange in real time with pump-probe methods.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is two-photon photoemission interference imaging: the electric field of a propagating waveguide mode beats against the second photon of the excitation pulse, imprinting fringes in the photoelectron yield whose period equals the mode wavelength. A fast Fourier transform of the PEEM image along the propagation direction converts each fringe pattern into a peak at the in-plane wavevector $k$, and scanning the photon energy $E_{\mathrm{ph}}$ maps the dispersion $E_{\mathrm{ph}}(k/k_0)$, with $k_0$ the vacuum wavevector. The TE or TM character of each feature is assigned from the dominant electric-field component in FDTD simulations, and the coupling strength is read from the local maximum and minimum (turning points) of the polariton branches after Savitzky-Golay smoothing. Lowering the work function with potassium so that 2PPE works with the same pulses that excite the polaritons is the enabling preparative step.

What would settle it

A direct falsifying test would be to measure the same flake with an independent momentum-resolved probe, such as near-field scanning optical microscopy or angle-resolved reflectance, and compare the extracted $k/k_0$ peak positions and the inferred $\Delta E$; a systematic mismatch at particular photon energies would show that the photoemission fringe period is not a faithful readout of the mode wavevector. Repeating the measurement with freshly evaporated potassium and after it has decayed would test for work-function-induced distortions.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The authors demonstrate that when a tunable near-infrared laser is focused onto the edge of a thin WSe2 flake, the launched transverse electric and transverse magnetic waveguide modes interfere with the second photon of the two-photon photoemission process and create a spatial wave pattern in the photoelectron yield. Fourier-transforming these patterns as a function of excitation photon energy reconstructs the dispersion relation of the modes. In a 55 nm flake the TE mode shows the lower-polariton bending around the A-exciton at $E_{\mathrm{ex}} \approx 1.6$ eV, while the TM mode remains a straight line, showing no coupling at that thickness; FDTD simulations reproduce both behaviours and trace the difference to how much of the mode field is confined inside the waveguide. In a 30 nm flake both polariton branches are visible, and the turning points of the dispersion yield $\Delta E = 94.8$ meV for the TE-mode exciton-polariton. The central discovery is therefore a new application: PEEM can image strong-coupling dispersions in TMDC waveguides with polarization-selective excitation of TE and TM modes.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that the spatial period of the photoemission wave pattern equals the true wavelength of the propagating waveguide mode, so a Fourier transform of the PEEM image yields the mode's real in-plane wavevector without wavelength-dependent phase shifts or distortions from the two-photon process or the potassium layer.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • PEEM becomes a parallel-imaging alternative to SNOM and cathodoluminescence for measuring waveguide-polariton dispersions in TMDCs.
  • Laser polarization gives a direct control knob: parallel polarization couples to the TE mode and shows strong coupling, while perpendicular polarization launches the TM mode, which stays uncoupled below a thickness threshold.
  • The reported $\Delta E = 94.8$ meV provides a quantitative benchmark that connects PEEM data to coupling-strength estimates from near-field and cathodoluminescence studies.
  • Because PEEM records a full field of view at once, the same geometry can be extended with pump-probe excitation to follow polariton propagation and energy exchange in the time domain.
  • The thickness thresholds (TE coupling by 20–30 nm, TM coupling only near 60 nm) give a practical design rule for future waveguide-polariton samples.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the same fringe images contain propagation-length information, so fitting the fringe decay as a function of photon energy could extract the imaginary part of the polariton wavevector, not just the dispersion.
  • Editorial inference: a natural transfer test is to apply the method to other TMDCs or heterobilayers and compare the PEEM-derived splitting with an independent angle-resolved reflectivity measurement on the same flake.
  • Editorial inference: the supplementary three-photon photoemission data suggest the method can work without alkali doping at higher intensities, which if developed further would remove the potassium layer as a possible perturbation of the near-field.
  • Editorial inference: a direct quantitative comparison of acquisition time, mode selectivity, and energy range against SNOM would make the authors' claim of practical advantage testable.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports the use of photoemission electron microscopy (PEEM) to image wave patterns of propagating waveguide modes in exfoliated WSe2 flakes and to extract their dispersion relations around the A-exciton resonance (E_ex ≈ 1.6 eV). For a laser polarization parallel to the excitation edge, the authors observe a TE-mode whose dispersion bends near the exciton, and they interpret this as the lower polariton branch of an exciton-polariton. For perpendicular polarization, they report an essentially uncoupled TM-mode. Supporting finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) simulations use literature optical constants and reproduce the main experimental dispersions. From the experimental dispersion of a thinner flake, the authors report an energy splitting of ΔE = 94.8 meV, obtained from turning points in the photon-energy dependence of the FFT-peak wavevector after Savitzky-Golay smoothing; the same procedure applied to simulated data gives 84.4 meV, consistent with an independent intensity-based estimate of 81.5 meV. The paper concludes that PEEM can measure exciton-photon coupling in TMDC waveguides and suggests time-resolved PEEM as a future extension.

Significance. If the ΔE value is reliable, the paper establishes PEEM as a viable far-field method for measuring exciton-polariton dispersions in TMDC waveguides, complementing SNOM and cathodoluminescence. The main strengths are the independent FDTD validation with literature optical constants (no free parameters), the clear polarization selectivity between TE and TM modes, the open data availability, and the demonstration of a quantitative extraction of a coupling energy. The claims are falsifiable, and the central experimental observation — a dispersive bending near the exciton resonance — is supported by the simulations. However, the quantitative central number, ΔE = 94.8 meV, currently rests on an estimator whose unbiasedness for the experimental conditions is not established, and the supporting experimental details (flake thickness, upper-branch signal-to-noise) are incomplete.

major comments (3)
  1. [Results and Discussion, Fig. 4] The experimental splitting ΔE = 94.8 meV is extracted from turning points in a smoothed k(Eph) curve of FFT-peak maxima (Fig. 4(f)). No uncertainty or robustness analysis is provided: there are no error bars, no variation of the Savitzky-Golay window, no variation of the ROI or normalization scheme, and no test against alternative estimators. As the authors themselves note, the branches of a planar waveguide polariton are monotonic in k(E); the observed extrema therefore reflect the switching of the FFT maximum between branches or between a branch and the k/k0 = 1 laser feature. The internal check on FDTD data (84.4 meV vs 81.5 meV) is encouraging, but it is a single simulation dataset and does not demonstrate that the turning-point estimator is unbiased in the experimental conditions, where absorption, potassium-induced doping, pulse-duration variation, and noise differ. Please add an explicit robustness analysis — e.g., injecting noise into the FDTD field data, varying the smoothing window and ROI, and reporting the resulting spread of ΔE — or fit the two branches (and the k/k0 = 1 feature) simultaneously to estimate ΔE with a confidence interval. Without this, the central quantitative claim is not supported.
  2. [Results and Discussion, Fig. 4] The experimental upper polariton branch in Fig. 4(b) is only visible after per-energy normalization, and the paper gives no quantification of its significance (signal-to-noise ratio, peak amplitude relative to background, or reproducibility across repeated measurements). Because the turning-point method relies on the upper branch's position, it is essential to demonstrate that this branch is not a normalization artifact, particularly in the energy range where the k/k0 = 1 laser feature overlaps. Please provide a quantitative measure of the upper-branch visibility (e.g., an intensity profile along the upper branch, or a comparison with the simulated data at the same signal level), and state the detection threshold used to identify the branch.
  3. [Results and Discussion, Fig. 4 caption] The flake used for the ΔE measurement is described only as 'significantly smaller,' and its AFM thickness is never given in the main text or in the figure caption. The FDTD simulations in Fig. 4 are for 30 nm, and the SI text seems to assume this value, but the experimental flake may not be exactly 30 nm. This is a crucial sample parameter for reproducibility and for the validity of the simulation comparison and the coupling-threshold discussion. Please provide the measured thickness of this flake, and if it differs from 30 nm, discuss how the comparison is affected.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract] The phrase 'transversal electric and magnetic modes' should be 'transverse electric and magnetic modes'.
  2. [Experimental Details] There is a typo in 'Vext = 10 kV for this study' (missing space); also, the abbreviation 'Vext' should be defined (extractor voltage).
  3. [Results and Discussion] The statement 'there seems to be a threshold for the waveguide thickness' based on simulations should be explicitly labeled as a simulation prediction, not an experimental observation, since the experiments in the paper do not test the threshold directly.
  4. [Fig. 4(f)] The blue experimental curve in Fig. 4(f) ends at high energy without a clear indication of the error or of the number of data points; consider plotting the raw FFT maxima as markers along with the smoothed curve.
  5. [References] Ref. 44 is the software package 'Tidy3D'; please include a version number or the date of access, and consider adding a note in the text about the simulation code's availability and validation (the paper already mentions the mesh-convergence check, which is good).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the reported dispersion and ΔE = 94.8 meV are extracted from PEEM data and cross-validated with independent FDTD simulations using literature optical constants, not from fitted parameters or self-citation chains.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained. The experimental dispersion is obtained by Fourier-transforming PEEM wave patterns and tracking the FFT maximum at each photon energy. The FDTD simulations use optical constants from an external reference (Munkhbat et al., ACS Photonics 2022) and no parameter fitted to the experimental dispersion enters the simulation. The ΔE = 94.8 meV value is extracted from turning points in the experimental k(Eph) curve, but this procedure is validated by comparing it against an intensity-based extraction from unnormalized FDTD data (84.4 meV vs 81.5 meV); the agreement is presented as a cross-check, not as a proof that the experimental estimator is unbiased. No equation in the paper defines the reported splitting in terms of the input data by construction. The comparison with the cathodoluminescence study (Ref. 16) does include two authors of this paper, but it is used only for context and to explain discrepancies in reported splittings; it is not load-bearing for the central claim. The weakest assumption, that the PEEM wave pattern period equals the waveguide mode wavelength, is a physical modeling assumption that could be wrong, but it is not circular. Possible bias in the turning-point estimator would be a correctness risk, not a circularity, because no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper does not introduce free parameters in the sense of fitting. It relies on several domain assumptions: applicability of literature optical constants (Ref. 45) to the exfoliated flakes, the assumed A-exciton energy of 1.6 eV, and the validity of interpreting PEEM wave patterns as electric field intensity maps. No new entities are introduced.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Optical constants of WSe2 from Munkhbat et al. (Ref. 45) are valid for the exfoliated flakes in the experiment.
    FDTD simulations use these constants; discrepancy in absolute k/k0 between experiment and simulation is attributed to this assumption.
  • domain assumption The A-exciton resonance in the measured flakes is at E_Ex ≈ 1.6 eV, consistent with prior literature, and is not significantly shifted by potassium doping or thickness.
    All dispersion plots center around this value; a shift would change the interpretation of the anti-crossing and the extracted splitting.
  • domain assumption The spatial frequency of the photoemission wave pattern corresponds to the real part of the mode's wavevector.
    This is the foundational assumption of the NI-PEEM dispersion measurement method, cited from prior work.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Photoemission electron microscopy of exciton-polaritons in thin WSe$_2$ waveguides." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UWXMXJ4T

@misc{pith2026250203361,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Photoemission electron microscopy of exciton-polaritons in thin WSe$_2$ waveguides},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UWXMXJ4T}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.03361}
}
abstract

Exciton-polaritons emerging from the interaction of photons and excitons in the strong coupling regime are intriguing quasiparticles for the potential exchange of energy during light-matter interaction processes such as light harvesting. The coupling causes an energy anti-crossing in the photon dispersion centered around the exciton resonance, i.e., a Rabi splitting between a lower and upper energetic branch. The size of this splitting correlates with the coupling strength between the exciton and the photonic modes. In this work, we investigate this coupling between excitons and photonic waveguide modes excited simultaneously in thin-film flakes of the transition-metal dichalcogenide WSe$_2$. Using a Photoemission electron microscope, we are able to extract the dispersion of the transversal electric and magnetic modes propagating through these flakes as well as extract the energy splitting. Ultimately, our findings provide a basis for the investigation of the propagation of exciton-polaritons in the time-domain via time-resolved photoemission.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.03361 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Exciton-polariton dispersion and experimental scheme. (a) Schematic illustration of the exciton-polariton dispersion. (b) Experimental setup with thin WSe2 flakes situated on a transparent glass substrate. A laser illuminates the flake from the bottom, where it excites the exciton-polaritons as well as generates the photoelectrons, which enter the PEEM lens system. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Waveguide mode excitation in WSe2 investigated using PEEM. (a) AFM image of a WSe2 flake with a thickness of approximately 55 nm. (b) PEEM image of the same flake recorded with a photon energy of 4.9 eV. The dashed circle (FOV) indicates the field of view of the detailed measurement in (c,d). The dashed square (ROI) indicates the region of interest for the extraction of the wave patterns. (c,d) PEEM images recorded … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Waveguide mode dispersion. Dispersion curves extracted from the Fourier transformation of measured and simulated wave patterns. The wave numbers k are relative to the wave number of light in vacuum k0. (a,c) Experimental data for TE- and TM-mode, respectively. (b,d) FDTD simulations TE- and TM-mode, respectively. Simulated data for a flake thickness of 55 nm. clearly in a comparison of the wave patterns at all measu… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Strong-coupling energy splitting. (a) PEEM image of a WSe2 flake recorded with a photon energy of 1.55 eV and laser polarization oriented parallel to the bottom edge. The dashed square (ROI) indicates the region of interest for the extraction of the wave pat￾terns. (b)…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

16 extracted references · 13 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    (1) Cheiwchanchamnangij, T.; Lambrecht, W. R. L. Quasiparticle band structure calcu- lation of monolayer, bilayer, and bulk MoS2. Phys. Rev. B 2012, 85, 205302, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.205302. (2) Chernikov, A.; Berkelbach, T. C.; Hill, H. M.; Rigosi, A.; Li, Y.; Aslan, B.; Reich- man, D. R.; Hybertsen, M. S.; Heinz, T. F. Exciton Binding Energy and Nonh...

    doi:10.1103/physrevb.85.205302 2012

  2. [2]

    Menon, V. M. Strong light–matter coupling in two-dimensional atomic crystals.Na- ture Photonics 2015, 9, 30–34, DOI:10.1038/nphoton.2014.304. (7) Lundt, N.; Klembt, S.; Cherotchenko, E.; Betzold, S.; Iff, O.; Nalitov, A. V.; Klaas, M

    doi:10.1038/nphoton.2014.304 2015

  3. [3]

    P.; Kavokin, A

    Dietrich, C. P.; Kavokin, A. V.; Höfling, S.; Schneider, C. Room-temperature Tamm- plasmon exciton-polaritons with a WSe2 monolayer.Nature Communications 2016, 7, 13328, DOI: 10.1038/ncomms13328. (8) Flatten, L. C.; He, Z.; Coles, D. M.; Trichet, A. A. P.; Powell, A. W.; Taylor, R. A.; Warner,J.H.; Smith,J.M.Room-temperatureexciton-polaritonswithtwo-dimen...

    doi:10.1038/ncomms13328 2016

  4. [4]

    Nano-optical imaging ofWSe2 waveguide modes revealing light-exciton interac- tions

    Xu, X. Nano-optical imaging ofWSe2 waveguide modes revealing light-exciton interac- tions. Phys. Rev. B2016, 94, 081402, DOI:10.1103/PhysRevB.94.081402. (15) Hu, F.; Luan, Y.; Scott, M. E.; Yan, J.; Mandrus, D. G.; Xu, X.; Fei, Z. Imaging exciton–polariton transport in MoSe2 waveguides.Nature Photonics 2017, 11, 356– 360, DOI: 10.1038/nphoton.2017.65. (16...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.94.081402

  5. [5]

    Surface Plasmon Polariton Emission Prompted by Organic Nanofibers on Thin Gold Films

    Bauer, M.; Rubahn, H.-G. Surface Plasmon Polariton Emission Prompted by Organic Nanofibers on Thin Gold Films. Plasmonics 2012, 7, 253–260, DOI: 10.1007/s11468-011-9301-9. 13 (20) Kahl, P.; Wall, S.; Witt, C.; Schneider, C.; Bayer, D.; Fischer, A.; Melchior, P.; Horn- von Hoegen, M.; Aeschlimann, M.; Meyer zu Heringdorf, F.-J. Normal-Incidence Pho- toemis...

    work page doi:10.1007/s11468-011-9301-9 2012

  6. [6]

    M.; Oren- stein, M.; Aeschlimann, M

    Kahl, P.; Podbiel, D.; Mathias, S.; Giessen, H.; zu Heringdorf, F.-J. M.; Oren- stein, M.; Aeschlimann, M. Revealing the subfemtosecond dynamics of orbital an- gular momentum in nanoplasmonic vortices. Science 2017, 355, 1187–1191, DOI: 10.1126/science.aaj1699. (22) Joly, A. G.; El-Khoury, P. Z.; Hess, W. P. Spatiotemporal Imaging of Surface Plas- mons Us...

    work page doi:10.1126/science.aaj1699 2017

  7. [7]

    Micro-spectroscopy of Buried Short-Range Surface Plasmon Polaritons Supported by Thin Polycrystalline Gold Films.Plasmonics 2021, 16, 737– 746, DOI: 10.1007/s11468-020-01333-1

    Rubahn, H.-G.; Bauer, M. Micro-spectroscopy of Buried Short-Range Surface Plasmon Polaritons Supported by Thin Polycrystalline Gold Films.Plasmonics 2021, 16, 737– 746, DOI: 10.1007/s11468-020-01333-1. (25) Davis, T. J.; Janoschka, D.; Dreher, P.; Frank, B.; zu Heringdorf, F.-J. M.; Giessen, H. Ultrafast vector imaging of plasmonic skyrmion dynamics with ...

    work page doi:10.1007/s11468-020-01333-1 2021

  8. [8]

    Plasmonic wavelength-dependent optical switch.Opt

    Aeschlimann, M. Plasmonic wavelength-dependent optical switch.Opt. Express 2023, 31, 9579–9590, DOI:10.1364/OE.484035. (27) Fitzgerald, J. P. S.; Word, R. C.; Saliba, S. D.; Könenkamp, R. Photonic near-field imaging in multiphoton photoemission electron microscopy.Phys. Rev. B 2013, 87, 205419, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.87.205419. (28) Word, R. C.; Fitzgerald...

    work page doi:10.1364/oe.484035 2023

Show all 16 references
  1. [9]

    Detection and characterization of attenuated multimode waveguiding inSiO2 slabs using photoemission electron microscopy.Phys

    Selhuber-Unkel, C.; Bauer, M. Detection and characterization of attenuated multimode waveguiding inSiO2 slabs using photoemission electron microscopy.Phys. Rev. B2018, 98, 085128, DOI:10.1103/PhysRevB.98.085128. (32) Stenmark, T.; Könenkamp, R. Photoemission electron microscop...

    doi

  2. [10]

    H.; Pfeiffer, W.; Pres, S.; Stannowski, B

    Loeber, T. H.; Pfeiffer, W.; Pres, S.; Stannowski, B. Direct imaging of photonic band- edge states in golden Vogel spirals using photoemission electron microscopy.J. Opt. Soc. Am. B2023, 40, B19–B27, DOI:10.1364/JOSAB.479667. (34) Leißner, T.; Lemke, C.; Fiutowski, J.; Radke, ...

    doi

  3. [11]

    Morphological Tuning of the Plasmon Disper- sion Relation in Dielectric-Loaded Nanofiber Waveguides.Phys

    Hansen, J.; Rubahn, H.-G.; Bauer, M. Morphological Tuning of the Plasmon Disper- sion Relation in Dielectric-Loaded Nanofiber Waveguides.Phys. Rev. Lett.2013, 111, 046802, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.046802. (35) Lemke, C.; Leißner, T.; Klick, A.; Fiutowski, J.; Radke, J. W.;...

    2013 doi

  4. [12]

    The complex dispersion relation of surface plasmon polaritons at gold/para-hexaphenylene interfaces.Applied Physics B 2014, 116, 585–591, DOI:10.1007/s00340-013-5737-2

    Kjelstrup-Hansen, J.; Rubahn, H.-G.; Bauer, M. The complex dispersion relation of surface plasmon polaritons at gold/para-hexaphenylene interfaces.Applied Physics B 2014, 116, 585–591, DOI:10.1007/s00340-013-5737-2. (36) Hartelt, M.; Terekhin, P. N.; Eul, T.; Mahro, A.-K.; Fri...

    2014 doi

  5. [13]

    Mapping surface plasmon polariton propaga- tion via counter-propagating light pulses.Opt

    Hansen, J.; Rubahn, H.-G.; Bauer, M. Mapping surface plasmon polariton propaga- tion via counter-propagating light pulses.Opt. Express 2012, 20, 12877–12884, DOI: 10.1364/OE.20.012877. (39) Kahl, P.; Podbiel, D.; Schneider, C.; Makris, A.; Sindermann, S.; Witt, C.; Kilbane, D

    2012 doi

  6. [14]

    H.-v.; Aeschlimann, M.; zu Heringdorf, F

    Hoegen, M. H.-v.; Aeschlimann, M.; zu Heringdorf, F. M. Direct Observation of Surface Plasmon Polariton Propagation and Interference by Time-Resolved Imaging in Normal- Incidence Two Photon Photoemission Microscopy.Plasmonics 2018, 13, 239–246, DOI: 10.1007/s11468-017-0504-6. ...

    2018 doi

  7. [15]

    Adaptive subwavelength control of nano-optical fields

    Rohmer, M.; Spindler, C.; Steeb, F. Adaptive subwavelength control of nano-optical fields. Nature 2007, 446, 301–304, DOI:10.1038/nature05595. (43) Buckanie, N.; Kirschbaum, P.; Sindermann, S.; zu Heringdorf, F.-J. M. Interaction of light and surface plasmon polaritons in Ag I...

    2007

  8. [16]

    Femtosecond time-resolved photoemission electron microscopy operated at sample illumination from the rear side

    Rubahn, H.-G.; Reinhardt, C.; Elmers, H.-J.; Bauer, M. Femtosecond time-resolved photoemission electron microscopy operated at sample illumination from the rear side. Review of Scientific Instruments2019, 90, 053704, DOI:10.1063/1.5088031. (49) Buck, J.; Iwicki, J.; Rossnagel,...

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.