Algebraic Aspects of Periodic Graph Operators

Frank Sottile; Stephen P. Shipman

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Algebraic Aspects of Periodic Graph Operators

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A periodic graph operator becomes a Laurent-polynomial matrix under the Floquet transform, and its spectrum is the projection of the algebraic Bloch variety it defines.

desk verdict A useful synthesis of periodic graph operator spectral theory in commutative algebra, but the proof of Theorem 4's density claim has a real gap that needs fixing. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.03659 v1 pith:SGQHYCE4 submitted 2025-02-05 math.SP math-phmath.AGmath.MP

Stephen P. Shipman , Frank Sottile This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.SPmath-phmath.AGmath.MP MSC 47B3947A1014M25

keywords periodicgraphoperatorBlochvarietyFermidispersionrelationtoriccompactificationtight-bindingmodelLaurentpolynomialmodulespectralbands

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper develops a systematic algebraic treatment of periodic linear operators on graphs. The central claim is that an operator that commutes with a free $\mathbb{Z}^d$ translation action on the vertices is, after a formal Fourier (Floquet) transform, exactly a module endomorphism of the Laurent polynomial module $C[z^{\pm}]^W$, where $W$ is a finite fundamental domain. From this, the spectrum of the operator is shown to coincide with the set of energies $\lambda$ for which the dispersion determinant $D(z,\lambda)=\det(\hat{A}(z)-\lambda I)$ vanishes at some point $z$ on the unit torus, so the entire spectrum is encoded in the algebraic Bloch variety $D(z,\lambda)=0$. This algebraic encoding lets the authors use commutative algebra and toric geometry to study reducibility of Fermi surfaces and the nondegeneracy of spectral band edges. A sympathetic reader would care because it gives a unified framework for understanding the algebraic versus analytic origins of spectral features in tight-binding models.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the dispersion determinant $D(z,\lambda)=\det(\hat{A}(z)-\lambda I)$, where $\hat{A}(z)$ is the Laurent polynomial matrix obtained from the periodic operator by the formal Floquet transform. Its zero set in $(\mathbb{C}^\times)^d\times\mathbb{C}$ is the complex Bloch variety; fixing $\lambda$ gives the complex Fermi variety, and intersecting with the unit torus gives the real Fermi variety that directly determines the spectrum. The paper also uses the Newton polytope of $D(z,\lambda)$ to compactify the Bloch variety torically, which yields bounds on the number of critical points and a criterion for their nondegeneracy.

What would settle it

For a concrete finite-range periodic operator on a graph such as the hexagonal lattice with a generic potential, compute the dispersion polynomial $D(z,\lambda)$ symbolically, then numerically diagonalize $\hat{A}(z)$ on a fine grid of the unit torus and compare the set of $\lambda$ where $D$ vanishes to the union of the numerically obtained bands; any spectral point outside the algebraic projection, or any $\lambda$ in the projection absent from the L2 spectrum, would refute the central spectral description.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that periodic graph operators have a clean algebraic description: a linear operator on compactly supported functions that commutes with translations is equivalently an endomorphism of the free module $C[z^{\pm}]^W$ over the Laurent polynomial ring. Under this correspondence, the operator becomes multiplication by the Laurent polynomial matrix $\hat{A}(z)$, and its spectral theory is governed by the polynomial $D(z,\lambda)=\det(\hat{A}(z)-\lambda I)$. The authors prove that $\lambda$ belongs to the $L^2$ spectrum exactly when $D(z,\lambda)=0$ for some $z$ on the unit torus, and that eigenvalues of infinite multiplicity correspond precisely to factors of $D$ that depend only on $\lambda$. The same variety governs finer questions: reducibility of the cross-section at fixed $\lambda$ (the Fermi variety) enables the construction of defect modes embedded in the continuous spectrum, and the Newton polytope of $D$ controls the number and degeneracy of critical points of the band functions. In this way, algebraic structure and analytic spectral structure are cleanly separated.

Load-bearing premise

The framework assumes the operator has finite range and the translation action has a finite fundamental domain, so $\hat{A}(z)$ is a Laurent polynomial matrix and $D(z,\lambda)$ is a polynomial; if hopping has infinite range, the dispersion relation need not be algebraic and the Bloch/Fermi variety methods do not apply.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Spectra of finite-range periodic graph operators can be computed and analysed as projections of algebraic varieties, making tools from commutative algebra and algebraic geometry directly applicable.
Reducibility of the Fermi variety at a given energy is a concrete mechanism for the existence of exponentially decaying defect states at energies embedded in the continuous spectrum, as illustrated for bilayer graphene models.
The Newton polytope bound provides a finite, checkable condition for the spectral edges nondegeneracy conjecture on a given graph: if the bound is achieved with all critical points isolated, the conjecture holds for that graph.
Flat bands appear exactly as factors of $D(z,\lambda)$ that are independent of $z$, and they are always eigenvalues of infinite multiplicity for the $L^2$ operator.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The module viewpoint suggests that invariants of the kernel module (such as Fitting ideals) could provide new spectral invariants beyond the dispersion determinant itself, for example distinguishing operators with the same Bloch variety but different spectral multiplicities.
The toric compactification approach could be extended beyond counting critical points to bound other spectral features, such as the number of van Hove singularities or the topology of Fermi surfaces within a band.
Because the framework only needs $\hat{A}(z)$ to be a Laurent polynomial, it should adapt to operators with finite-range hopping on graphs with more general amenable group actions, provided the Fourier transform lands in a ring of Laurent polynomials.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Read this one for what it is: a careful survey that puts the standard Floquet–Bloch theory of periodic graph operators into one coherent algebraic language. The framework—periodic operators as module endomorphisms of C[z±]^W, spectrum as the projection of the Bloch variety—is correct, and the paper makes it clean. None of it is deeply new: Theorem 2 is essentially a definition, Theorem 4 is due to Kuchment, and the reducibility discussion builds on existing work. But the paper earns its keep as a reference, especially the formal Floquet transform section and the worked examples (graphene, Lieb, bilayer stacks). The treatment of reducibility and of the spectral edges nondegeneracy conjecture is informative and up to date.

The soft spots are real, and one is a genuine flaw. In §3.4.3, the proof of density of compactly supported eigenfunctions uses a truncation argument that does not work. If ϕ vanishes on the inner shell ∂, the truncated function ψ = 1_{W+Λ}ϕ does not satisfy the eigenfunction equation near the outer boundary, because (Aψ)(x) loses contributions from points outside the box where ϕ is nonzero. The 1D check with r(A)=1 is decisive: (A 1_Λ ϕ)(ℓ−1) = ϕ(ℓ−2) ≠ 0. Since this density claim is the step that makes (2)⇒(1) in Theorem 4, the algebraic characterization of point spectrum is not actually proven here. The theorem may well be true—it is due to Kuchment—but the paper needs either a valid proof or an explicit citation to one. A referee should catch this.

Beyond that, several assertions are stated without proof: the reducibility dichotomy in §4.3.2 and the dimension of the real Bloch variety in §4.2.3. And Section 5 leans on three in-preparation papers [11,12,37], so that part cannot be checked. These are limitations, not fatal; the paper is honest about them, but they narrow what is verifiable now.

Who this is for: a graduate student or researcher wanting an algebraic entry point into periodic graph operators will get genuine value from the first four sections. The paper deserves a serious referee, but only after the Theorem 4 proof is repaired. I would cite it and discuss it in a reading group, but I would not take its proof of point-spectrum characterization at face value without checking the external reference.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper develops a systematic algebraic framework for periodic linear operators on graphs with a free, co-finite Z^d action. It identifies the operator under the formal Floquet transform with a module endomorphism of C[z^±]^W (Theorem 2), defines the Bloch and Fermi varieties as the zero sets of the dispersion determinant D(z,λ)=det(Â(z)-λI), and characterizes the L2 spectrum through the real torus intersection with the Fermi variety (Theorems 4 and 6). The later sections survey reducibility of Fermi varieties, defect modes in the continuum, and nondegeneracy of spectral band edges via Newton polytopes and toric compactification.

Significance. The central equivalences—periodic operators as module endomorphisms, and spectrum as the projection of the Bloch variety—are elegant and provide a valuable unifying perspective. The proofs of Theorems 2, 3, 5, and 6 are correct for finite-range operators and are presented in a self-contained way. The explicit examples (hexagonal lattice, Lieb lattice, AA- and AB-stacked bilayer graphene) make the abstract framework concrete and useful. However, the proof of Theorem 4, which is load-bearing for the point-spectrum characterization, contains a gap that needs repair; the underlying statement is known, so the gap is fixable. The paper also honestly flags its reliance on unpublished manuscripts in Section 5.

major comments (2)

[§3.4.3] The truncation argument proving density of compactly supported eigenfunctions is invalid. After constructing φ ∈ E that vanishes on ∂ = Λ_ℓ \ Λ_{ℓ-2r(A)}, the paper asserts that ψ = 1_{W+Λ_ℓ}φ is also a λ-eigenfunction, claiming this follows from the definition of r(A). That conclusion is false for points in the inner boundary layer of ∂: for such x, ψ(x)=0, but (Aψ)(x) receives contributions from points y inside Λ_{ℓ-2r(A)} within distance r(A) of x where φ(y) may be nonzero. A one-dimensional nearest-neighbor example with r(A)=1 gives (A1_Λφ)(ℓ-1)=φ(ℓ-2), which need not vanish. Consequently, the proof of (2)=>(1) in Theorem 4 is incomplete. Since Theorem 4 is central to the algebraic characterization of point spectrum, the proof must be corrected, or the theorem should be proved by giving a precise, valid citation to the original density theorem of Kuchment [26] and spelling out how it applies.
[Theorem 4, (3)=>(2)] The step from the factorization condition to an L2 eigenfunction asserts that the vector f(ζ) can be taken continuous on T^d. For a self-adjoint analytic family with eigenvalue crossings, a globally continuous eigenvector need not exist; a measurable selection suffices for Fourier inversion. This is a standard measurable-selection argument, but it is not supplied. The proof should either justify the continuity claim or replace it with the correct measurable selection statement.

minor comments (6)

[§4.2] There is a typo: 'annd' should be 'and', and 'the the' should be 'the'.
[§5.1] There are typos: 'disucssed' should be 'discussed', 'instgance' should be 'instance', and 'involed' should be 'involved'.
[References] References [29] and [30] appear to be the same paper (same title, same journal, same volume and pages). The citation in §5.1 to 'Liu [30] proved that the extrema are isolated' likely refers to a different result; please clarify and correct the reference.
[§4.2.3] The statement that the real Bloch variety has dimension d in T^d×R should be qualified: it holds when the real variety contains a smooth point; otherwise the dimension of the real point set can be lower. Please add the necessary genericity hypothesis.
[§4.3.2] The assertion that 'either D(z,λ0) is reducible for all λ0∈C or it is reducible for only a finite set of values' is stated without proof or reference. As stated, it is not an immediate consequence of Hilbert's irreducibility theorem over C; please provide a proof or a precise citation.
[§5] Several claims in Section 5, particularly the toric compactification discussion in §5.5 and the critical point degree in §5.3, rely on manuscripts described as 'in preparation' or 'in progress' ([11], [12], [37]). Please mark explicitly which statements depend on unpublished work and ensure that all assertions used in the main narrative are supported by published references, or clearly identified as conjectural/sketch.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central framework is derived from definitions and standard spectral arguments; self-citations are not load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper is a mathematical exposition establishing a dictionary between periodic graph operators and module endomorphisms via the Floquet transform. The central equivalences (Theorem 2, Theorem 4, and Theorem 6) are proved from the definitions of the Floquet transform, the dispersion determinant D(z,lambda)=det(hat A(z)-lambda I), and standard Hilbert-space Weyl-sequence arguments; no parameter is fitted and no conclusion is assumed by construction. The later sections on Fermi-variety reducibility and critical points cite published work, including some co-authored items [9,13] and in-preparation items [11,12,37], but those citations are not used to force the central spectral claims, and the paper's own contributions are presented as a unifying framework rather than as empirical predictions. The skeptical concern about the truncation argument in Section 3.4.3 is a possible correctness gap: the cut-off psi=1_{W+Lambda}phi need not satisfy A psi = lambda psi at boundary-layer vertices. A proof gap, however, is not circularity, because it does not make an output equal to an input by construction. No circular step can be exhibited with the required specificity, so the appropriate finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no fitted parameters and no new postulates. Its dependencies are standard theorems from Fourier analysis, algebraic geometry, and commutative algebra, plus the explicit domain assumption of finite-range, co-finite periodic graphs. The framework does not depend on any invented physical entity.

assumptions (5)

standard math The L2 Floquet transform U: ell2(V) to L2(T^d) tensor C^W is unitary and yields the direct integral decomposition of A.
Invoked in §2.2.2-2.2.3 and §3.3.1, Eq. (3.56); quoted from Reed-Simon, Thm XIII.97.
standard math Kushnirenko's theorem bounds the number of isolated critical points by (d+1)! vol(N(A)).
Used as Theorem 9 in §5.4.
standard math Hilbert's irreducibility theorem implies the reducibility dichotomy for Fermi varieties stated in §4.3.2.
Stated without proof in §4.3.2.
domain assumption The real points of the non-standard real structure (z,lambda) to (conj(z)^-1, conj(lambda)) on the Bloch variety form a smooth submanifold of dimension d.
Assumed in §4.2.3 to conclude the real Bloch variety has dimension d rather than d-1.
domain assumption The graph is co-finite (finite fundamental domain W) and the action is free; the operator has finite range.
Central to the framework: makes C[z^±]^W a finitely generated free module and D(z,lambda) a Laurent polynomial. Stated in §2.1.1 and §3.1.1.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Algebraic Aspects of Periodic Graph Operators." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SGQHYCE4

@misc{pith2026250203659,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Algebraic Aspects of Periodic Graph Operators},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SGQHYCE4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.03659}
}

read the original abstract

A periodic linear graph operator acts on states (functions) defined on the vertices of a graph equipped with a free translation action. Fourier transform with respect to the translation group reveals the central spectral objects, Bloch and Fermi varieties. These encode the relation between the eigenvalues of the translation group and the eigenvalues of the operator. As they are algebraic varieties, algebraic methods may be used to study the spectrum of the operator. We establish a framework in which commutative algebra directly comes to bear on the spectral theory of periodic operators, helping to distinguish their algebraic and analytic aspects. We also discuss reducibility of the Fermi variety and non-degeneracy of spectral band edges.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.03659 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** Filonov-Kachkovskiy Bloch variety with a curve of critical points. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Four Newton polytopes Kushnirenko [22] gives the following bound for the number of critical points. Theorem 9 ([13, Cor. 2.5]). The number of isolated critical points of the function λ on the Bloch variety BA is at most (d + 1)!vol(N (A)). 21 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Absence of flat bands for discrete periodic graph operators with generic potentials
math.SP 2025-09 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

Generic potentials on any connected periodic graph produce no flat bands.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[26]

P. A. Kuchment. On the Floquet theory of periodic difference equations. In Geometrical and algebraical aspects in several complex variables (Cetraro, 1989) , volume 8 of Sem. Conf. , pages 201–209. EditEl, Rende, 1991

work page 1989
[1]

B¨ attig.A toroidal compactification of the two-dimensional Bloch-manifold

D. B¨ attig.A toroidal compactification of the two-dimensional Bloch-manifold . PhD thesis, ETH-Z¨ urich, 1988

work page 1988
[2]

B¨ attig

D. B¨ attig. A toroidal compactification of the Fermi surface for the discrete Schr¨ odinger operator. Comment. Math. Helvetici , 67:1–16, 1992

work page 1992
[3]

B¨ attig, H

D. B¨ attig, H. Kn¨ orrer, and E. Trubowitz. A directional compactification of the complex Fermi surface. Compositio Math, 79(2):205–229, 1991. 22

work page 1991
[4]

D. N. Bernstein. The number of roots of a system of equations. Functional Anal. Appl. , 9(3):183–185, 1975

work page 1975
[5]

B. M. Brown, K. M. Schmidt, S. P. Shipman, and I. Wood. The inverse problem for a spectral asymmetry function of the Schr¨ odinger operator on a finite interval.Mathematika, 67:788–806, 2021

work page 2021
[6]

D. Cox, J. Little, and H. Schenck. Toric varieties, volume 124 of Graduate Studies in Mathematics . American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2011

2011
[7]

D. A. Cox, J. Little, and D. O’Shea. Using algebraic geometry , volume 185 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer, New York, second edition, 2005

work page 2005

Show all 41 references

[8]

D. A. Cox, J. Little, and D. O’Shea. Ideals, varieties, and algorithms . Undergraduate Texts in Math- ematics. Springer, Cham, fourth edition, 2015. An introduction to computational algebraic geometry and commutative algebra

2015
[9]

N. Do, P. Kuchment, and F. Sottile. Generic properties of dispersion relations for discrete periodic operators. J. Math. Phys. , 61:103502, 2020

2020
[10]

Faust, W

M. Faust, W. Liu, R. Matos, J. Plute, J. Robinson, Y. Tao, E. Tran, and C. Zhuang. Floquet isospec- trality of the zero potential for discrete periodic Schr¨ odinger operators. J. Math. Phys. , 65(7):Paper No. 073501, 8, 2024

2024
[11]

Faust, J

M. Faust, J. Lopez, S. P. Shipman, and F. Sottile. Toric compactification of periodic operators, 2025. in preparation

2025
[12]

Faust, J

M. Faust, J. Robinson, and F. Sottile. The critical point degree of a periodic graph, 2025. In Progress

2025
[13]

Faust and F

M. Faust and F. Sottile. Critical points of discrete periodic operators. J. Spectr. Theory , 14(1):1–35, 2024

2024
[14]

Fillman, W

J. Fillman, W. Liu, and R. Matos. Irreducibility of the Bloch variety for finite-range Schr¨ odinger operators. J. Funct. Anal. , 283(10), 2022

2022
[15]

Fillman, W

J. Fillman, W. Liu, and R. Matos. Algebraic properties of the Fermi variety for periodic graph operators. J. Funct. Anal. , 286(4), 2024

2024
[16]

Filonov and I

N. Filonov and I. Kachkovskiy. On the structure of band edges of 2-dimensional periodic elliptic oper- ators. Acta Math., 221(1):59–80, 2018

2018
[17]

Filonov and I

N. Filonov and I. Kachkovskiy. On spectral bands of discrete periodic operators. Comm. Math. Phys. , 405:21:1–17, 2024

2024
[18]

Fisher, W

L. Fisher, W. Li, and S. P. Shipman. Reducible Fermi surface for multi-layer quantum graphs including stacked graphene. Comm. Math. Phys. , 385:1499–1534, 2021

2021
[19]

Gieseker, H

D. Gieseker, H. Kn¨ orrer, and E. Trubowitz.The Geometry of Algebraic Fermi Curves . Academic Press, Boston, 1993

1993
[20]

Higuchi and Y

Y. Higuchi and Y. Nomura. Spectral structure of the laplacian on a covering graph. European J. Combinatorics, 30(2):570–585, 2009

2009
[21]

Judge, S

E. Judge, S. Naboko, and I. Wood. Embedded eigenvalues for perturbed periodic Jacobi operators using a geometric approach. J. Difference Equ. Appl. , 24(8):1247–1272, 2018

2018
[22]

A. G. Kouchnirenko. Poly` edres de Newton et nombres de Milnor. Invent. Math. , 32(1):1–31, 1976

1976
[23]

Kravaris

C. Kravaris. On the density of eigenvalues on periodic graphs. SIAM J. Appl. Algebra Geom. , 7(3):585– 609, 2023. 23

2023
[24]

Kuchment

P. Kuchment. An overview of periodic elliptic operators. Bull. Am. Math. Soc. , 53(3):343–414, 2016

2016
[25]

Kuchment and B

P. Kuchment and B. Vainberg. On the structure of eigenfunctions corresponding to embedded eigen- values of locally perturbed periodic graph operators. Comm. Math. Phys. , 268(3):673–686, 2006

2006
[27]

Li and S

W. Li and S. P. Shipman. Irreducibility of the Fermi surface for planar periodic graph operators. Letters in Mathematical Physics , 2020

2020
[28]

W. Liu. Criteria for embedded eigenvalues for discrete Schr¨ odinger operators. Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN, (20):15803–15832, 2021

2021
[30]

W. Liu. Irreducibility of the Fermi variety for discrete periodic Schr¨ odinger operators and embedded eigenvalues. Geom. Funct. Anal., 32(1):1–30, 2022

2022
[31]

W. Liu. Fermi isospectrality of discrete periodic Schr¨ odinger operators with separable potentials on Z2. Comm. Math. Phys. , 399(2):1139–1149, 2023

2023
[32]

W. Liu. Fermi isospectrality for discrete periodic Schr¨ odinger operators. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. , 77(2):1126–1146, 2024

2024
[33]

Massatt, S

D. Massatt, S. P. Shipman, I. Vekhter, and J. H. Wilson. Defect bound states in the continuum of bilayer electronic materials without symmetry protection. arXiv:2312.16844

arXiv
[34]

Parnovski and R

L. Parnovski and R. Shterenberg. Perturbation theory for spectral gap edges of 2d periodic schr¨ odinger operators. J. Funct. Anal. , pages 444–470, 2017

2017
[35]

C. Peters. Algebraic Fermi curves. Ast´ erisque, S´ eminaire Bourbaki, 189–190(723):239–258, 1990

1990
[36]

Reed and B

M. Reed and B. Simon. Methods of Mathematical Physics: Analysis of Operators , volume IV. Academic Press, 1980

1980
[37]

Regan, F

M. Regan, F. Sottile, and S. Telen. Bloch discriminants, 2025. in preparation

2025
[38]

I. R. Shafarevich. Basic algebraic geometry. 1 . Springer, Heidelberg, russian edition, 2013. Varieties in projective space

2013
[39]

I. R. Shafarevich. Basic algebraic geometry. 2 . Springer, Heidelberg, third edition, 2013. Schemes and complex manifolds, Translated from the 2007 third Russian edition by Miles Reid

2013
[40]

S. P. Shipman. Eigenfunctions of unbounded support for embedded eigenvalues of locally perturbed periodic graph operators. Comm. Math. Phys. , 332(2):605–626, 2014

2014
[41]

S. P. Shipman. Reducible Fermi surfaces for non-symmetric bilayer quantum-graph operators.J. Spectral Theory, DOI 10.4171/JST/285, 2019

2019 doi
[42]

Villalobos

J. Villalobos. Reducibility of Schr¨ odinger Operators on Multilayer Graphs. PhD thesis, Louisiana State University, 2024. 24

2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [26]

P. A. Kuchment. On the Floquet theory of periodic difference equations. In Geometrical and algebraical aspects in several complex variables (Cetraro, 1989) , volume 8 of Sem. Conf. , pages 201–209. EditEl, Rende, 1991

work page 1989

[2] [1]

B¨ attig.A toroidal compactification of the two-dimensional Bloch-manifold

D. B¨ attig.A toroidal compactification of the two-dimensional Bloch-manifold . PhD thesis, ETH-Z¨ urich, 1988

work page 1988

[3] [2]

B¨ attig

D. B¨ attig. A toroidal compactification of the Fermi surface for the discrete Schr¨ odinger operator. Comment. Math. Helvetici , 67:1–16, 1992

work page 1992

[4] [3]

B¨ attig, H

D. B¨ attig, H. Kn¨ orrer, and E. Trubowitz. A directional compactification of the complex Fermi surface. Compositio Math, 79(2):205–229, 1991. 22

work page 1991

[5] [4]

D. N. Bernstein. The number of roots of a system of equations. Functional Anal. Appl. , 9(3):183–185, 1975

work page 1975

[6] [5]

B. M. Brown, K. M. Schmidt, S. P. Shipman, and I. Wood. The inverse problem for a spectral asymmetry function of the Schr¨ odinger operator on a finite interval.Mathematika, 67:788–806, 2021

work page 2021

[7] [6]

D. Cox, J. Little, and H. Schenck. Toric varieties, volume 124 of Graduate Studies in Mathematics . American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2011

2011

[8] [7]

D. A. Cox, J. Little, and D. O’Shea. Using algebraic geometry , volume 185 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer, New York, second edition, 2005

work page 2005