Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 188 references

Can a secluded self-interacting dark sector generate detectable gravitational waves?

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A fully secluded self-interacting dark sector can still produce gravitational waves detectable by SKA, but only for one charge assignment and only after neutrino and Lyman-alpha constraints are imposed.

desk verdict New result: combining Neff and Lyman-alpha kills charge assignment A for SKA/LISA, but the surviving window for B sits on an optimistic v_w = 0.9 and may vanish with a real wall-velocity calculation. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.04108 v3 pith:6LI74R7H submitted 2025-02-06 hep-ph astro-ph.HE

Song Li , Jin Min Yang , Mengchao Zhang , Yang Zhang , Rui Zhu This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-phastro-ph.HE
keywords secludeddarksectorself-interactingmattergravitationalwavesfirst-orderphasetransitionradiationeffectivenumberofneutrinosLyman-alphaconstraintSKA
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks whether a dark-matter sector that is completely isolated from ordinary matter — no direct couplings, its own conserved entropy — can still reveal itself through gravitational waves emitted when it underwent a cosmic phase transition. The authors build a concrete model with a dark force, dark matter, and nearly massless dark radiation, and scan its parameters. They find that the measured extra radiation ($\Delta N_{\text{eff}}$) and the Lyman-$\alpha$ forest bound on dark-matter–dark-radiation scattering eliminate almost all of the parameter space that future gravitational-wave detectors would otherwise see. For one charge assignment the model becomes completely invisible to SKA and LISA; for another, a small set of points remains detectable by SKA. This matters because such secluded dark sectors are otherwise almost impossible to test.

What carries the argument

The central object is a secluded dark sector gauged by a $U(1)'$ symmetry, containing a Dirac fermion dark matter candidate, a complex dark Higgs whose spontaneous breaking drives a first-order phase transition, and a nearly massless complex scalar acting as dark radiation. The load-bearing machinery is the phase-transition gravitational-wave calculation: percolation temperature, strength parameter $\alpha$, inverse duration $\beta/H_*$, and the efficiency parameters for bubble collision, sound waves, and turbulence, which set the peak frequency and amplitude of the three gravitational-wave sources. The two cosmological filters that carry the argument are $\Delta N_{\text{eff}}$, which counts the energy dumped into dark radiation by the transition's latent heat, and the Lyman-$\alpha$ bound, which the paper recasts as $a_{\text{dark}} < 30\,\xi_\infty^{-4}\,\text{Mpc}^{-1}$ on the effective-theory interaction strength.

What would settle it

A lattice or first-principles Boltzmann calculation of the bubble-wall velocity for this $U(1)'$ Abelian Higgs model that returns $v_w \lesssim 0.7$ for the surviving charge-B points would push the predicted peak amplitudes below the SKA power-law-integrated sensitivity curve and falsify the claim of a detectable region; alternatively, a tighter Lyman-$\alpha$ bound on $a_{\text{dark}}$ at or below $30\,\xi_\infty^{-4}\,\text{Mpc}^{-1}$ would remove the surviving points by the paper's own criterion.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that current cosmological data have already ruled out most — and in one charge assignment all — of the gravitational-wave signals this secluded $U(1)'$ dark sector could produce, while leaving a narrow SKA-detectable window for the other charge assignment. The argument combines three computations: the velocity-dependent dark-matter self-scattering cross section matched to small-scale structure observations, the $\Delta N_{\text{eff}}$ contribution from the latent heat dumped into dark radiation, and the dark-matter–dark-radiation interaction strength $a_{\text{dark}}$ bounded by Lyman-$\alpha$ observations. After imposing both cosmological filters, the gravitational-wave peak amplitudes for charge assignment A fall below the SKA power-law-integrated sensitivity curve, whereas charge assignment B retains points whose peaks intersect it.

Load-bearing premise

For transitions that do not run away, the paper sets the bubble-wall speed to 90% of the speed of light as an optimistic estimate, and the surviving SKA-detectable points sit close to the sensitivity curve; if the true wall speed is lower, the remaining window could disappear.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Charge assignment A is fully excluded: after the $\Delta N_{\text{eff}}$ and Lyman-alpha constraints, none of its gravitational-wave spectra, not just the peaks, cross the SKA or LISA sensitivity curves.
  • Charge assignment B still contains parameter points whose peak amplitudes intersect the SKA power-law-integrated sensitivity curve, so the secluded self-interacting dark sector remains a live target for low-frequency detectors.
  • $\Delta N_{\text{eff}}$ acts as a uniform ceiling on all dark first-order phase transitions, cutting the maximum peak amplitude by more than two to three orders of magnitude across the scan.
  • The Lyman-alpha bound is the sharper discriminator between charge assignments: it suppresses assignment A strongly and assignment B only mildly, because the latter achieves strong gravitational waves at smaller coupling $\alpha'$.
  • If a stochastic background were detected in the SKA band, the same data would favour charge assignment B over assignment A as the particle-physics interpretation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: a first-principles computation of the bubble-wall velocity for this Abelian Higgs theory is the natural next step; the surviving SKA points sit near the sensitivity curve, so a real wall velocity below about 0.8 could push the remaining region below detectability.
  • Beyond the paper: the same $\Delta N_{\text{eff}}$ plus Lyman-alpha filter can be applied to any secluded model with dark radiation and a first-order transition, so claimed gravitational-wave prospects from such models should be re-examined with both constraints.
  • Beyond the paper: a future Lyman-alpha measurement that tightens the $a_{\text{dark}}$ bound, or a pulsar-timing-array detection at nanohertz frequencies, would overconstrain or confirm the surviving window, turning it into a concrete prediction for the dark-to-photon temperature ratio.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies a secluded dark sector with a spontaneously broken U(1)' gauge symmetry, containing self-interacting Dirac fermion dark matter, a dark Higgs, and nearly massless complex scalar dark radiation. It computes the gravitational-wave spectrum from a first-order phase transition in the dark sector, and confronts the model with small-scale structure data, Lyman-alpha bounds on dark acoustic oscillations, and the Planck/BAO constraint on Delta N_eff. A parameter scan over {m_chi, m_A', alpha', m_s, xi_reh} for two charge assignments finds that charge assignment A is entirely excluded for SKA and LISA after all constraints, while charge assignment B retains a small region detectable by SKA. The abstract's central claim is that both constraints exclude much of the parameter space favored by future GW detectors, but a small part remains detectable by SKA.

Significance. If the central claim is robust, the paper provides a useful phenomenological result: a fully secluded, self-interacting dark sector can still be probed by future stochastic GW searches, despite strong Delta N_eff and Lyman-alpha restrictions. The technical ingredients are standard and clearly presented: the effective potential with daisy resummation, the ETHOS parameterization for DM-DR scattering, and the usual GW spectral formulas. The paper also makes a concrete, falsifiable statement about which charge assignments survive. However, the positive detectability claim is currently conditional on an explicitly optimistic assumption for the bubble-wall velocity, and the relic-density handling relies on an unmapped asymmetry parameter imported from the authors' previous work. These issues make the paper not yet ready as is.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 3.4.1, Eqs. (3.37), (3.42)] The detectability claim for charge assignment B rests on the fixed wall velocity v_w = 0.9. The text states that for non-runaway transitions 'we simply take vw = 0.9 for a quick and optimistic GWs signal estimation.' Since h^2 Omega_peak^s is proportional to v_w/(beta/H_*) and f_peak^s is proportional to (beta/H_*)/v_w, lowering v_w to a typical subluminal value such as 0.2 reduces the peak amplitude by roughly a factor of 4.5 and shifts the peak frequency by the same factor. The surviving points in Fig. 8 (right) lie close to the SKA PLISC, so both effects reduce the spectral overlap and can eliminate the claimed small detectable region. The authors should either compute v_w in the non-runaway regime or present the SKA-visible region as a function of v_w, clearly separating the optimistic benchmark from a conservative one.
  2. [Sec. 2.2 and Sec. 4] The relic density is never computed in the scan. The input parameter list (2.5) and the scan parameters at the start of Sec. 4 do not include the asymmetry Y_Delta_chi, and the text justifies the omission by citing the authors' previous work [42] for a 'wide range' of Y_Delta_chi. Because every scanned point is assumed to reproduce the observed DM relic density through this adjustable asymmetry, the exclusion plots and the surviving SKA region are conditional on an unquantified cosmological input. The paper should show how Y_Delta_chi maps onto the scanned parameters, or explicitly scan/marginalize over it and verify that the required asymmetry can be generated without introducing additional late-time constraints.
  3. [Sec. 3.1, Table 1] The lower bound for the UDG rotation-curve requirement (sigma/m_chi ~ 47-86 cm^2/g) is attributed to 'private discussion with the author of Ref. [128]' (footnote after Eq. (3.5)). This datum directly enters the chi^2 fit that determines the allowed {m_chi, m_A', alpha'} region in Fig. 2. For reproducibility, the paper should either use a published value or provide the explicit derivation of this bound in an appendix; otherwise the exact shape of the surviving region cannot be independently checked.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 4, first sentence] 'parameter scape scan' should read 'parameter space scan'.
  2. [Fig. 3 caption] 'Middel' should read 'Middle'.
  3. [Sec. 5] 'change assignment A' appears twice in the Conclusion and should read 'charge assignment A'.
  4. [Eq. (3.10)-(3.12)] The sign of Gamma_DR-DM is negative in Eq. (3.10) and Eq. (3.11), while the derived a_dark in Eq. (3.12) is positive; the sign convention should be made consistent, even if only the absolute value enters the bound.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the GW spectra are computed from model inputs and standard phase-transition formulas, then compared with external cosmological constraints and detector sensitivity curves; the only self-citations are prior model-building results and are not load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained. The GW signal is computed from the finite-temperature effective potential (Eqs. 3.17-3.25), the bounce action and percolation condition (Eqs. 3.26-3.29), and standard sound-wave, bubble-collision, and turbulence templates (Eqs. 3.34-3.43). Peak amplitudes and frequencies depend only on model inputs (m_chi, m_A', m_s, alpha', xi_reh) and thermodynamic quantities; no quantity is fitted to the SKA or LISA sensitivity curves. The two constraints that remove most of the parameter space are independent external inputs: Delta N_eff from Planck+BAO data (Eq. 3.15) and the ETHOS Lyman-alpha bound from Archidiacono et al. (Eq. 3.13). The 'detectable' points in Figs. 7-8 are simply spectra that intersect the external power-law integrated sensitivity curves; this is a comparison, not a fit. The only self-referential elements are citations to the authors' prior work: Ref. [42] for the asymmetric-DM relic-density mechanism and Ref. [116] for the Linde-Weinberg lower bound on the dark Higgs mass. These are prior peer-reviewed, parameter-free model-building results that are not the present paper's target observable, and they do not enter the GW-spectrum calculation itself, so the central detection claim has independent content. The fixed bubble-wall velocity v_w = 0.9 is an openly acknowledged optimistic assumption ('we simply take vw = 0.9 for a quick and optimistic GWs signal estimation'), but an assumed input is not a fitted input and is not a quantity defined in terms of the predicted spectrum; it affects robustness, not circularity. No circular reduction, renamed observable, or fitted input called a prediction is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 3 invented entities

The scanned inputs are not derived; the detectability result inherits the assumptions of zero portals, a tunable relic-density asymmetry, and an optimistic v_w = 0.9. The constraints applied afterwards (Neff, Lyman-alpha, small-scale structure) are external, which keeps the circularity burden low.

free parameters (7)
  • xi_reh = scanned, no explicit range given in text
    Initial dark-to-visible temperature ratio; sets dark sector energy density and directly enters GW amplitude, Delta Neff, and adark.
  • alpha' = scanned 0.005 to 0.4
    Dark gauge coupling; controls self-interaction strength, FOPT strength, and DM-DR scattering rate.
  • m_chi = scanned 10 to 600 GeV
    Dark matter mass; enters DM self-interaction cross section and adark.
  • m_A' = scanned 0.1 to 10 MeV
    Dark photon mass; sets the range of the self-interaction and suppresses DM-DR scattering for p much smaller than m_A'.
  • m_s = scanned from Linde-Weinberg lower bound to m_A'/2
    Dark Higgs mass; controls the strength and existence of the first-order phase transition and hence the GW amplitude.
  • v_w = 0.9
    Bubble wall velocity fixed optimistically for non-runaway FOPT; GW peak amplitudes scale with v_w and the SKA-detectable window depends on this choice.
  • Y_Delta_chi = not specified
    Dark matter-antimatter asymmetry invoked to satisfy relic density; asserted to vary over a wide range from the authors' previous work [42], but not computed or constrained in this scan.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The dark sector was thermally populated at high temperature with initial temperature ratio xi_reh.
    No portal or reheating mechanism is provided; this initial condition is required for all subsequent dark sector evolution (Sec. 2.2).
  • ad hoc to paper All renormalizable portals to the visible sector are exactly zero.
    This defines the 'secluded' scenario and guarantees separate entropy conservation, but also makes the dark sector invisible except through gravity, GWs, Delta Neff, and DAO (Sec. 2.1).
  • ad hoc to paper The DM relic density can always be satisfied by an adjustable asymmetry Y_Delta_chi whose wide range is taken from the authors' previous work [42].
    No relic-density constraint is imposed in the scan; every scanned point is assumed to yield the observed DM abundance (Sec. 2.2, second bullet).
  • ad hoc to paper For non-runaway FOPT, the bubble wall velocity is fixed to v_w = 0.9.
    Acknowledged as a quick and optimistic estimation; it directly changes the GW peak amplitudes and the detectability conclusion (Sec. 3.4.1).
  • domain assumption The Lyman-alpha bound from ETHOS applies as adark < 30 xi_inf^-4 Mpc^-1 for Gamma_DR-DM proportional to T'^4.
    The model's DM-DR scattering is mapped into the ETHOS parameterization and compared with the external Lyman-alpha bound of Ref. [134] (Sec. 3.2).
  • domain assumption A continuum first-order phase transition in the Abelian Higgs model requires m_s < m_A'/2, following lattice studies.
    Used to set the upper scan bound on the dark Higgs mass and to ensure the model can produce a FOPT (Sec. 2.1, Refs. [117,118]).
invented entities (3)
  • Dark photon A' (MeV-scale U(1)' gauge boson) independent evidence
    purpose: Mediates dark matter self-interactions, becomes massive after spontaneous symmetry breaking, and participates in the first-order phase transition generating GWs.
    The model gives concrete falsifiable handles: a stochastic GW spectrum at SKA/LISA frequencies and contributions to Delta Neff and DAO through the dark sector evolution.
  • Dark Higgs S independent evidence
    purpose: Spontaneously breaks the dark U(1)', gives mass to A' and psi, and drives the first-order phase transition that produces gravitational waves.
    The FOPT parameters derived from the dark Higgs potential determine the frequency and amplitude of the predicted GW signal, which is a testable outside-the-paper handle.
  • Dark radiation psi (complex scalar) independent evidence
    purpose: Acts as nearly massless dark radiation so that A' and S can decay without overclosing the universe; also sources Delta Neff and DM-DR scattering leading to DAO.
    The energy density of psi is directly constrained by the measured Neff bound, giving an independent falsifiable handle outside the GW calculation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Can a secluded self-interacting dark sector generate detectable gravitational waves?." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6LI74R7H

@misc{pith2026250204108,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Can a secluded self-interacting dark sector generate detectable gravitational waves?},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6LI74R7H}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.04108}
}
abstract

In this work we study the possibility to detect the gravitational waves generated by a secluded self-interacting dark sector. ``Secluded'' means that the dark sector has almost no portal to the visible sector and thus its entropy is conserved by itself, and ``self-interacting'' means that dark matter in this model has a significant interaction to itself, making it consistent with the small-scale structure observations. A spontaneously broken $U(1)'$ is introduced for the interactions in the dark sector, and nearly massless dark radiation is also introduced to avoid the over-closure problem. Through a parameter space scan, we find that this model is highly constrained by the currently observed effective number of neutrinos ($N_{\text{eff}}$) and the large-scale structure observable Lyman-$\alpha$. Together, these two constraints exclude a large parameter space that is favored by future gravitational-wave detectors, but there is still a small portion of the model parameter space that can be detected by SKA.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

188 extracted references · 8 canonical work pages

  1. [42]

    Z. Chen, K. Ye and M. Zhang,Asymmetric dark matter with a spontaneously broken U(1)’: Self-interaction and gravitational waves, Phys. Rev. D107 (2023) 095027 [2303.11820]

    arXiv 2023

  2. [128]

    Nadler, D

    E.O. Nadler, D. Yang and H.-B. Yu,A Self-interacting Dark Matter Solution to the Extreme Diversity of Low-mass Halo Properties, Astrophys. J. Lett.958 (2023) L39 [2306.01830]

    arXiv 2023

  3. [1]

    Clowe, M

    D. Clowe, M. Bradac, A.H. Gonzalez, M. Markevitch, S.W. Randall, C. Jones et al.,A direct empirical proof of the existence of dark matter, Astrophys. J. Lett.648 (2006) L109 [astro-ph/0608407]

    arXiv 2006

  4. [2]

    Planck collaboration, Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A6 [1807.06209]. – 19 –

    arXiv 2020

  5. [3]

    Blumenthal, S.M

    G.R. Blumenthal, S.M. Faber, J.R. Primack and M.J. Rees,Formation of Galaxies and Large Scale Structure with Cold Dark Matter, Nature 311 (1984) 517

    1984

  6. [4]

    Springel, C.S

    V. Springel, C.S. Frenk and S.D.M. White,The large-scale structure of the Universe, Nature 440 (2006) 1137 [astro-ph/0604561]

    arXiv 2006

  7. [5]

    Moore, T.R

    B. Moore, T.R. Quinn, F. Governato, J. Stadel and G. Lake,Cold collapse and the core catastrophe, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.310 (1999) 1147 [astro-ph/9903164]

    arXiv 1999

  8. [6]

    Moore,Evidence against dissipationless dark matter from observations of galaxy haloes, Nature 370 (1994) 629

    B. Moore,Evidence against dissipationless dark matter from observations of galaxy haloes, Nature 370 (1994) 629

    1994

Show all 188 references
  1. [7]

    Flores and J.R

    R.A. Flores and J.R. Primack,Observational and theoretical constraints on singular dark matter halos, Astrophys. J. Lett.427 (1994) L1 [astro-ph/9402004]

    1994 arXiv

  2. [8]

    Oman et al.,The unexpected diversity of dwarf galaxy rotation curves, Mon

    K.A. Oman et al.,The unexpected diversity of dwarf galaxy rotation curves, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.452 (2015) 3650 [1504.01437]

    2015 arXiv

  3. [9]

    Moore, S

    B. Moore, S. Ghigna, F. Governato, G. Lake, T.R. Quinn, J. Stadel et al.,Dark matter substructure within galactic halos, Astrophys. J. Lett.524 (1999) L19 [astro-ph/9907411]

    1999 arXiv

  4. [10]

    Klypin, A.V

    A.A. Klypin, A.V. Kravtsov, O. Valenzuela and F. Prada,Where are the missing Galactic satellites?, Astrophys. J. 522 (1999) 82 [astro-ph/9901240]

    1999 arXiv

  5. [11]

    Boylan-Kolchin, J.S

    M. Boylan-Kolchin, J.S. Bullock and M. Kaplinghat,The Milky Way’s bright satellites as an apparent failure of LCDM, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.422 (2012) 1203 [1111.2048]

    2012 arXiv

  6. [12]

    Boylan-Kolchin, J.S

    M. Boylan-Kolchin, J.S. Bullock and M. Kaplinghat,Too big to fail? The puzzling darkness of massive Milky Way subhaloes, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.415 (2011) L40 [1103.0007]

    2011 arXiv

  7. [13]

    Kochanek and M.J

    C.S. Kochanek and M.J. White,A Quantitative study of interacting dark matter in halos, Astrophys. J. 543 (2000) 514 [astro-ph/0003483]

    2000 arXiv

  8. [14]

    Andrade, J

    K.E. Andrade, J. Fuson, S. Gad-Nasr, D. Kong, Q. Minor, M.G. Roberts et al.,A stringent upper limit on dark matter self-interaction cross-section from cluster strong lensing, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.510 (2021) 54 [2012.06611]

    2021 arXiv

  9. [15]

    Elbert, J.S

    O.D. Elbert, J.S. Bullock, M. Kaplinghat, S. Garrison-Kimmel, A.S. Graus and M. Rocha, A Testable Conspiracy: Simulating Baryonic Effects on Self-Interacting Dark Matter Halos, Astrophys. J. 853 (2018) 109 [1609.08626]

    2018 arXiv

  10. [16]

    A.B. Fry, F. Governato, A. Pontzen, T. Quinn, M. Tremmel, L. Anderson et al.,All about baryons: revisiting SIDM predictions at small halo masses, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 452 (2015) 1468 [1501.00497]

    2015 arXiv

  11. [17]

    Yoshida, V

    N. Yoshida, V. Springel, S.D.M. White and G. Tormen,Collisional dark matter and the structure of dark halos, Astrophys. J. Lett.535 (2000) L103 [astro-ph/0002362]

    2000 arXiv

  12. [18]

    Moore, S

    B. Moore, S. Gelato, A. Jenkins, F.R. Pearce and V. Quilis,Collisional versus collisionless dark matter, Astrophys. J. Lett.535 (2000) L21 [astro-ph/0002308]

    2000 arXiv

  13. [19]

    Zavala, M

    J. Zavala, M. Vogelsberger and M.G. Walker,Constraining Self-Interacting Dark Matter with the Milky Way’s dwarf spheroidals, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.431 (2013) L20 [1211.6426]

    2013 arXiv

  14. [20]

    Elbert, J.S

    O.D. Elbert, J.S. Bullock, S. Garrison-Kimmel, M. Rocha, J. Oñorbe and A.H.G. Peter, Core formation in dwarf haloes with self-interacting dark matter: no fine-tuning necessary, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.453 (2015) 29 [1412.1477]. – 20 –

    2015 arXiv

  15. [21]

    Rocha, A.H.G

    M. Rocha, A.H.G. Peter, J.S. Bullock, M. Kaplinghat, S. Garrison-Kimmel, J. Onorbe et al.,Cosmological Simulations with Self-Interacting Dark Matter I: Constant Density Cores and Substructure, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.430 (2013) 81 [1208.3025]

    2013 arXiv

  16. [22]

    Peter, M

    A.H.G. Peter, M. Rocha, J.S. Bullock and M. Kaplinghat,Cosmological Simulations with Self-Interacting Dark Matter II: Halo Shapes vs. Observations, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 430 (2013) 105 [1208.3026]

    2013 arXiv

  17. [23]

    Kaplinghat, S

    M. Kaplinghat, S. Tulin and H.-B. Yu,Dark Matter Halos as Particle Colliders: Unified Solution to Small-Scale Structure Puzzles from Dwarfs to Clusters, Phys. Rev. Lett.116 (2016) 041302 [1508.03339]

    2016 arXiv

  18. [24]

    Tulin and H.-B

    S. Tulin and H.-B. Yu,Dark Matter Self-interactions and Small Scale Structure, Phys. Rept. 730 (2018) 1 [1705.02358]

    2018 arXiv

  19. [25]

    Vogelsberger, J

    M. Vogelsberger, J. Zavala, C. Simpson and A. Jenkins,Dwarf galaxies in CDM and SIDM with baryons: observational probes of the nature of dark matter, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 444 (2014) 3684 [1405.5216]

    2014 arXiv

  20. [26]

    Dooley, A.H.G

    G.A. Dooley, A.H.G. Peter, M. Vogelsberger, J. Zavala and A. Frebel,Enhanced Tidal Stripping of Satellites in the Galactic Halo from Dark Matter Self-Interactions, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.461 (2016) 710 [1603.08919]

    2016 arXiv

  21. [27]

    Dave, D.N

    R. Dave, D.N. Spergel, P.J. Steinhardt and B.D. Wandelt,Halo properties in cosmological simulations of selfinteracting cold dark matter, Astrophys. J. 547 (2001) 574 [astro-ph/0006218]

    2001 arXiv

  22. [28]

    Robertson, D

    A. Robertson, D. Harvey, R. Massey, V. Eke, I.G. McCarthy, M. Jauzac et al.,Observable tests of self-interacting dark matter in galaxy clusters: cosmological simulations with SIDM and baryons, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.488 (2019) 3646 [1810.05649]

    2019

  23. [29]

    Spergel and P.J

    D.N. Spergel and P.J. Steinhardt,Observational evidence for selfinteracting cold dark matter, Phys. Rev. Lett.84 (2000) 3760 [astro-ph/9909386]

    2000 arXiv

  24. [30]

    Colin, V

    P. Colin, V. Avila-Reese, O. Valenzuela and C. Firmani,Structure and subhalo population of halos in a selfinteracting dark matter cosmology, Astrophys. J. 581 (2002) 777 [astro-ph/0205322]

    2002 arXiv

  25. [31]

    Vogelsberger, J

    M. Vogelsberger, J. Zavala and A. Loeb,Subhaloes in Self-Interacting Galactic Dark Matter Haloes, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.423 (2012) 3740 [1201.5892]

    2012 arXiv

  26. [32]

    Harvey, R

    D. Harvey, R. Massey, T. Kitching, A. Taylor and E. Tittley,The non-gravitational interactions of dark matter in colliding galaxy clusters, Science 347 (2015) 1462 [1503.07675]

    2015 arXiv

  27. [33]

    Burkert,The Structure and evolution of weakly selfinteracting cold dark matter halos, Astrophys

    A. Burkert,The Structure and evolution of weakly selfinteracting cold dark matter halos, Astrophys. J. Lett.534 (2000) L143 [astro-ph/0002409]

    2000 arXiv

  28. [34]

    Sagunski, S

    L. Sagunski, S. Gad-Nasr, B. Colquhoun, A. Robertson and S. Tulin,Velocity-dependent Self-interacting Dark Matter from Groups and Clusters of Galaxies, JCAP 01 (2021) 024 [2006.12515]

    2021 arXiv

  29. [35]

    Yoshida, V

    N. Yoshida, V. Springel, S.D.M. White and G. Tormen,Weakly self-interacting dark matter and the structure of dark halos, Astrophys. J. Lett.544 (2000) L87 [astro-ph/0006134]

    2000 arXiv

  30. [36]

    Yang, E.O

    D. Yang, E.O. Nadler and H.-B. Yu,Strong Dark Matter Self-interactions Diversify Halo Populations within and surrounding the Milky Way, Astrophys. J. 949 (2023) 67 [2211.13768]. – 21 –

    2023 arXiv

  31. [37]

    Aboubrahim, W.-Z

    A. Aboubrahim, W.-Z. Feng, P. Nath and Z.-Y. Wang,Self-interacting hidden sector dark matter, small scale galaxy structure anomalies, and a dark force, Phys. Rev. D103 (2021) 075014 [2008.00529]

    2021 arXiv

  32. [38]

    Bellazzini, M

    B. Bellazzini, M. Cliche and P. Tanedo,Effective theory of self-interacting dark matter, Phys. Rev. D88 (2013) 083506 [1307.1129]

    2013 arXiv

  33. [39]

    Boddy, J.L

    K.K. Boddy, J.L. Feng, M. Kaplinghat, Y. Shadmi and T.M.P. Tait,Strongly interacting dark matter: Self-interactions and keV lines, Phys. Rev. D90 (2014) 095016 [1408.6532]

    2014 arXiv

  34. [40]

    Bringmann, J

    T. Bringmann, J. Hasenkamp and J. Kersten,Tight bonds between sterile neutrinos and dark matter, JCAP 07 (2014) 042 [1312.4947]

    2014 arXiv

  35. [41]

    Buckley and P.J

    M.R. Buckley and P.J. Fox,Dark Matter Self-Interactions and Light Force Carriers, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 083522 [0911.3898]

    2010 arXiv

  36. [43]

    Duerr, K

    M. Duerr, K. Schmidt-Hoberg and S. Wild,Self-interacting dark matter with a stable vector mediator, JCAP 09 (2018) 033 [1804.10385]

    2018 arXiv

  37. [44]

    J.L. Feng, M. Kaplinghat and H.-B. Yu,Halo Shape and Relic Density Exclusions of Sommerfeld-Enhanced Dark Matter Explanations of Cosmic Ray Excesses, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 (2010) 151301 [0911.0422]

    2010 arXiv

  38. [45]

    J.L. Feng, M. Kaplinghat, H. Tu and H.-B. Yu,Hidden Charged Dark Matter, JCAP 07 (2009) 004 [0905.3039]

    2009 arXiv

  39. [46]

    Foot and S

    R. Foot and S. Vagnozzi,Diurnal modulation signal from dissipative hidden sector dark matter, Phys. Lett. B748 (2015) 61 [1412.0762]

    2015 arXiv

  40. [47]

    Foot and S

    R. Foot and S. Vagnozzi,Dissipative hidden sector dark matter, Phys. Rev. D91 (2015) 023512 [1409.7174]

    2015 arXiv

  41. [48]

    Foot and S

    R. Foot and S. Vagnozzi,Solving the small-scale structure puzzles with dissipative dark matter, JCAP 07 (2016) 013 [1602.02467]

    2016 arXiv

  42. [49]

    Kainulainen, K

    K. Kainulainen, K. Tuominen and V. Vaskonen,Self-interacting dark matter and cosmology of a light scalar mediator, Phys. Rev. D93 (2016) 015016 [1507.04931]

    2016 arXiv

  43. [50]

    Kamada, M

    A. Kamada, M. Yamada and T.T. Yanagida,Self-interacting dark matter with a vector mediator: kinetic mixing with theU(1)(B−L)3 gauge boson, JHEP 03 (2019) 021 [1811.02567]

    2019 arXiv

  44. [51]

    Kamada, K

    A. Kamada, K. Kaneta, K. Yanagi and H.-B. Yu,Self-interacting dark matter and muon g − 2 in a gauged U(1)Lµ−Lτ model, JHEP 06 (2018) 117 [1805.00651]

    2018 arXiv

  45. [52]

    Kamada, M

    A. Kamada, M. Yamada and T.T. Yanagida,Unification of the standard model and dark matter sectors in [SU(5)×U(1)]4, JHEP 07 (2019) 180 [1905.04245]

    2019 arXiv

  46. [53]

    Kamada, M

    A. Kamada, M. Yamada and T.T. Yanagida,Unification for darkly charged dark matter, Phys. Rev. D102 (2020) 015012 [1908.00207]

    2020 arXiv

  47. [54]

    Kamada, H.J

    A. Kamada, H.J. Kim and T. Kuwahara,Maximally self-interacting dark matter: models and predictions, JHEP 12 (2020) 202 [2007.15522]

    2020 arXiv

  48. [55]

    Kang,View FImP miracle (by scale invariance) à la self-interaction, Phys

    Z. Kang,View FImP miracle (by scale invariance) à la self-interaction, Phys. Lett. B751 (2015) 201 [1505.06554]. – 22 –

    2015 arXiv

  49. [56]

    Kitahara and Y

    T. Kitahara and Y. Yamamoto,Protophobic Light Vector Boson as a Mediator to the Dark Sector, Phys. Rev. D95 (2017) 015008 [1609.01605]

    2017 arXiv

  50. [57]

    Ko and Y

    P. Ko and Y. Tang,νΛMDM: A model for sterile neutrino and dark matter reconciles cosmological and neutrino oscillation data after BICEP2, Phys. Lett. B739 (2014) 62 [1404.0236]

    2014 arXiv

  51. [58]

    Ko and Y

    P. Ko and Y. Tang,Self-interacting scalar dark matter with localZ3 symmetry, JCAP 05 (2014) 047 [1402.6449]

    2014 arXiv

  52. [59]

    Loeb and N

    A. Loeb and N. Weiner,Cores in Dwarf Galaxies from Dark Matter with a Yukawa Potential, Phys. Rev. Lett.106 (2011) 171302 [1011.6374]

    2011 arXiv

  53. [60]

    Ma,Inception of Self-Interacting Dark Matter with Dark Charge Conjugation Symmetry, Phys

    E. Ma,Inception of Self-Interacting Dark Matter with Dark Charge Conjugation Symmetry, Phys. Lett. B772 (2017) 442 [1704.04666]

    2017 arXiv

  54. [61]

    Schutz and T.R

    K. Schutz and T.R. Slatyer,Self-Scattering for Dark Matter with an Excited State, JCAP 01 (2015) 021 [1409.2867]

    2015 arXiv

  55. [62]

    Tulin, H.-B

    S. Tulin, H.-B. Yu and K.M. Zurek,Resonant Dark Forces and Small Scale Structure, Phys. Rev. Lett.110 (2013) 111301 [1210.0900]

    2013 arXiv

  56. [63]

    Tulin, H.-B

    S. Tulin, H.-B. Yu and K.M. Zurek,Beyond Collisionless Dark Matter: Particle Physics Dynamics for Dark Matter Halo Structure, Phys. Rev. D87 (2013) 115007 [1302.3898]

    2013 arXiv

  57. [64]

    van den Aarssen, T

    L.G. van den Aarssen, T. Bringmann and C. Pfrommer,Is dark matter with long-range interactions a solution to all small-scale problems of \Lambda CDM cosmology?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 (2012) 231301 [1205.5809]

    2012 arXiv

  58. [65]

    W. Wang, M. Zhang and J. Zhao,Higgs exotic decays in general NMSSM with self-interacting dark matter, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A33 (2018) 1841002 [1604.00123]

    2018 arXiv

  59. [66]

    Depta, M

    P.F. Depta, M. Hufnagel and K. Schmidt-Hoberg,Updated BBN constraints on electromagnetic decays of MeV-scale particles, JCAP 04 (2021) 011 [2011.06519]

    2021 arXiv

  60. [67]

    Hufnagel, K

    M. Hufnagel, K. Schmidt-Hoberg and S. Wild,BBN constraints on MeV-scale dark sectors. Part II. Electromagnetic decays, JCAP 11 (2018) 032 [1808.09324]

    2018 arXiv

  61. [68]

    M. Ibe, S. Kobayashi, Y. Nakayama and S. Shirai,Cosmological constraints on dark scalar, JHEP 03 (2022) 198 [2112.11096]

    2022 arXiv

  62. [69]

    Ghosh, P

    D.K. Ghosh, P. Ghosh, S. Jeesun and R. Srivastava,Hubble Tension and Cosmological Imprints of U (1)X Gauge Symmetry: U (1)B3−3Li as a case study, 2312.16304

    arXiv

  63. [70]

    Ghosh, P

    D.K. Ghosh, P. Ghosh, S. Jeesun and R. Srivastava,Neff at CMB challenges U(1)X light gauge boson scenarios, Phys. Rev. D110 (2024) 075032 [2404.10077]

    2024 arXiv

  64. [71]

    Chang, R

    J.H. Chang, R. Essig and S.D. McDermott,Revisiting Supernova 1987A Constraints on Dark Photons, JHEP 01 (2017) 107 [1611.03864]

    2017 arXiv

  65. [72]

    Caputo, H.-T

    A. Caputo, H.-T. Janka, G. Raffelt and S. Yun,Cooling the Shock: New Supernova Constraints on Dark Photons, Phys. Rev. Lett.134 (2025) 151002 [2502.01731]

    2025 arXiv

  66. [73]

    Del Nobile, M

    E. Del Nobile, M. Kaplinghat and H.-B. Yu,Direct Detection Signatures of Self-Interacting Dark Matter with a Light Mediator, JCAP 10 (2015) 055 [1507.04007]

    2015 arXiv

  67. [74]

    S. Gori, G. Perez and K. Tobioka,KOTO vs. NA62 Dark Scalar Searches, JHEP 08 (2020) 110 [2005.05170]. – 23 –

    2020 arXiv

  68. [75]

    Blennow, E

    M. Blennow, E. Fernandez-Martinez, O. Mena, J. Redondo and P. Serra,Asymmetric Dark Matter and Dark Radiation, JCAP 07 (2012) 022 [1203.5803]

    2012 arXiv

  69. [76]

    Addazi and A

    A. Addazi and A. Marciano,Gravitational waves from dark first order phase transitions and dark photons, Chin. Phys. C 42 (2018) 023107 [1703.03248]

    2018 arXiv

  70. [77]

    Addazi, Y.-F

    A. Addazi, Y.-F. Cai, Q. Gan, A. Marciano and K. Zeng,NANOGrav results and dark first order phase transitions, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.64 (2021) 290411 [2009.10327]

    2021 arXiv

  71. [78]

    Azatov, M

    A. Azatov, M. Vanvlasselaer and W. Yin,Dark Matter production from relativistic bubble walls, JHEP 03 (2021) 288 [2101.05721]

    2021 arXiv

  72. [79]

    Azatov, G

    A. Azatov, G. Barni, S. Chakraborty, M. Vanvlasselaer and W. Yin,Ultra-relativistic bubbles from the simplest Higgs portal and their cosmological consequences, JHEP 10 (2022) 017 [2207.02230]

    2022 arXiv

  73. [80]

    Bai, A.J

    Y. Bai, A.J. Long and S. Lu,Dark Quark Nuggets, Phys. Rev. D99 (2019) 055047 [1810.04360]

    2019 arXiv

  74. [81]

    Breitbach, J

    M. Breitbach, J. Kopp, E. Madge, T. Opferkuch and P. Schwaller,Dark, Cold, and Noisy: Constraining Secluded Hidden Sectors with Gravitational Waves, JCAP 07 (2019) 007 [1811.11175]

    2019 arXiv

  75. [82]

    Costa, S

    F. Costa, S. Khan and J. Kim,A two-component vector WIMP — fermion FIMP dark matter model with an extended seesaw mechanism, JHEP 12 (2022) 165 [2209.13653]

    2022 arXiv

  76. [83]

    Costa, S

    F. Costa, S. Khan and J. Kim,A two-component dark matter model and its associated gravitational waves, JHEP 06 (2022) 026 [2202.13126]

    2022 arXiv

  77. [84]

    J.B. Dent, B. Dutta, S. Ghosh, J. Kumar and J. Runburg,Sensitivity to dark sector scales from gravitational wave signatures, JHEP 08 (2022) 300 [2203.11736]

    2022 arXiv

  78. [85]

    Fairbairn, E

    M. Fairbairn, E. Hardy and A. Wickens,Hearing without seeing: gravitational waves from hot and cold hidden sectors, JHEP 07 (2019) 044 [1901.11038]

    2019 arXiv

  79. [86]

    Ghosh, H.-K

    T. Ghosh, H.-K. Guo, T. Han and H. Liu,Electroweak phase transition with an SU(2) dark sector, JHEP 07 (2021) 045 [2012.09758]

    2021 arXiv

  80. [87]

    Han, K.-P

    C. Han, K.-P. Xie, J.M. Yang and M. Zhang,Self-interacting dark matter implied by nano-Hertz gravitational waves, Phys. Rev. D109 (2024) 115025 [2306.16966]

    2024 arXiv

  81. [88]

    Hashino, M

    K. Hashino, M. Kakizaki, S. Kanemura, P. Ko and T. Matsui,Gravitational waves from first order electroweak phase transition in models with the U(1)X gauge symmetry, JHEP 06 (2018) 088 [1802.02947]

    2018 arXiv

  82. [89]

    Huang and J.-H

    F.P. Huang and J.-H. Yu,Exploring inert dark matter blind spots with gravitational wave signatures, Phys. Rev. D98 (2018) 095022 [1704.04201]

    2018 arXiv

  83. [90]

    Jaeckel, V.V

    J. Jaeckel, V.V. Khoze and M. Spannowsky,Hearing the signal of dark sectors with gravitational wave detectors, Phys. Rev. D94 (2016) 103519 [1602.03901]

    2016 arXiv

  84. [91]

    Ratzinger and P

    W. Ratzinger and P. Schwaller,Whispers from the dark side: Confronting light new physics with NANOGrav data, SciPost Phys. 10 (2021) 047 [2009.11875]

    2021 arXiv

  85. [92]

    Schwaller,Gravitational Waves from a Dark Phase Transition, Phys

    P. Schwaller,Gravitational Waves from a Dark Phase Transition, Phys. Rev. Lett.115 (2015) 181101 [1504.07263]

    2015 arXiv

  86. [93]

    Soni and Y

    A. Soni and Y. Zhang,Gravitational Waves From SU(N) Glueball Dark Matter, Phys. Lett. B 771 (2017) 379 [1610.06931]. – 24 –

    2017 arXiv

  87. [94]

    Tsumura, M

    K. Tsumura, M. Yamada and Y. Yamaguchi,Gravitational wave from dark sector with dark pion, JCAP 07 (2017) 044 [1704.00219]

    2017 arXiv

  88. [95]

    Wang, W.-L

    W. Wang, W.-L. Xu and J.M. Yang,A hidden self-interacting dark matter sector with first-order cosmological phase transition and gravitational wave, Eur. Phys. J. Plus138 (2023) 781 [2209.11408]

    2023 arXiv

  89. [96]

    Wang, K.-P

    W. Wang, K.-P. Xie, W.-L. Xu and J.M. Yang,Cosmological phase transitions, gravitational waves and self-interacting dark matter in the singlet extension of MSSM, Eur. Phys. J. C 82 (2022) 1120 [2204.01928]

    2022 arXiv

  90. [97]

    Witten,Cosmic Separation of Phases, Phys

    E. Witten,Cosmic Separation of Phases, Phys. Rev. D30 (1984) 272

    1984

  91. [98]

    Kang and J

    Z. Kang and J. Zhu,Dark Chiral Phase Transition Driven by Chemical Potential and its Gravitational Wave Test, 2501.15242

    arXiv

  92. [99]

    Costa, J

    F. Costa, J. Hoefken Zink, M. Lucente, S. Pascoli and S. Rosauro-Alcaraz,Supercooled Dark Scalar Phase Transitions explanation of NANOGrav data, 2501.15649

  93. [100]

    Gonçalves, D

    J.a. Gonçalves, D. Marfatia, A.P. Morais and R. Pasechnik,Supercooled phase transitions in conformal dark sectors explain NANOGrav data, 2501.11619

    arXiv

  94. [101]

    Li and P

    J. Li and P. Nath,Supercooled Phase Transitions: Why Thermal History of Hidden Sector Matters in Analysis of Pulsar Timing Array Signals, 2501.14986

    arXiv

  95. [102]

    Banik, Y

    A. Banik, Y. Cui, Y.-D. Tsai and Y. Tsai,The Sound of Dark Sectors in Pulsar Timing Arrays, 2412.16282

    arXiv

  96. [103]

    Croon, V

    D. Croon, V. Sanz and G. White,Model Discrimination in Gravitational Wave spectra from Dark Phase Transitions, JHEP 08 (2018) 203 [1806.02332]

    2018 arXiv

  97. [104]

    Athron, C

    P. Athron, C. Balázs, A. Fowlie, L. Morris and L. Wu,Cosmological phase transitions: From perturbative particle physics to gravitational waves, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.135 (2024) 104094 [2305.02357]

    2024 arXiv

  98. [105]

    Bai and M

    Y. Bai and M. Korwar,Cosmological constraints on first-order phase transitions, Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) 095015 [2109.14765]

    2022 arXiv

  99. [106]

    Cyr-Racine, R

    F.-Y. Cyr-Racine, R. de Putter, A. Raccanelli and K. Sigurdson,Constraints on Large-Scale Dark Acoustic Oscillations from Cosmology, Phys. Rev. D89 (2014) 063517 [1310.3278]

    2014 arXiv

  100. [107]

    Cyr-Racine and K

    F.-Y. Cyr-Racine and K. Sigurdson,Cosmology of atomic dark matter, Phys. Rev. D87 (2013) 103515 [1209.5752]

    2013 arXiv

  101. [108]

    Buckley, J

    M.R. Buckley, J. Zavala, F.-Y. Cyr-Racine, K. Sigurdson and M. Vogelsberger,Scattering, Damping, and Acoustic Oscillations: Simulating the Structure of Dark Matter Halos with Relativistic Force Carriers, Phys. Rev. D90 (2014) 043524 [1405.2075]

    2014 arXiv

  102. [109]

    Blinnikov and M.Y

    S.I. Blinnikov and M.Y. Khlopov,ON POSSIBLE EFFECTS OF ’MIRROR’ PARTICLES, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys.36 (1982) 472

    1982

  103. [110]

    Beylin, M

    V. Beylin, M. Khlopov, V. Kuksa and N. Volchanskiy,New physics of strong interaction and Dark Universe, Universe 6 (2020) 196 [2010.13678]

    2020 arXiv

  104. [111]

    Falkowski, J.T

    A. Falkowski, J.T. Ruderman and T. Volansky,Asymmetric Dark Matter from Leptogenesis, JHEP 05 (2011) 106 [1101.4936]

    2011 arXiv

  105. [112]

    Dutta, N

    M. Dutta, N. Narendra, N. Sahu and S. Shil,Asymmetric self-interacting dark matter via Dirac leptogenesis, Phys. Rev. D106 (2022) 095017 [2202.04704]. – 25 –

    2022 arXiv

  106. [113]

    An, S.-L

    H. An, S.-L. Chen, R.N. Mohapatra and Y. Zhang,Leptogenesis as a Common Origin for Matter and Dark Matter, JHEP 03 (2010) 124 [0911.4463]

    2010 arXiv

  107. [114]

    Tulin, H.-B

    S. Tulin, H.-B. Yu and K.M. Zurek,Oscillating Asymmetric Dark Matter, JCAP 05 (2012) 013 [1202.0283]

    2012 arXiv

  108. [115]

    Buckley and S

    M.R. Buckley and S. Profumo,Regenerating a Symmetry in Asymmetric Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. Lett.108 (2012) 011301 [1109.2164]

    2012 arXiv

  109. [116]

    S. Li, J.M. Yang, M. Zhang and R. Zhu,Theoretical bounds on dark Higgs mass in a self-interacting dark matter model withU (1)′, 2405.18226

    arXiv

  110. [117]

    Karjalainen, M

    M. Karjalainen, M. Laine and J. Peisa,The Order of the phase transition in 3-d U(1) + Higgs theory, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl.53 (1997) 475 [hep-lat/9608006]

    1997 arXiv

  111. [118]

    Dimopoulos, K

    P. Dimopoulos, K. Farakos and G. Koutsoumbas,Three-dimensional lattice U(1) gauge Higgs model at low m(H), Eur. Phys. J. C1 (1998) 711 [hep-lat/9703004]

    1998 arXiv

  112. [119]

    Baldes and K

    I. Baldes and K. Petraki,Asymmetric thermal-relic dark matter: Sommerfeld-enhanced freeze-out, annihilation signals and unitarity bounds, JCAP 09 (2017) 028 [1703.00478]

    2017 arXiv

  113. [120]

    Graesser, I.M

    M.L. Graesser, I.M. Shoemaker and L. Vecchi,Asymmetric WIMP dark matter, JHEP 10 (2011) 110 [1103.2771]

    2011 arXiv

  114. [121]

    Bringmann, P.F

    T. Bringmann, P.F. Depta, T. Konstandin, K. Schmidt-Hoberg and C. Tasillo,Does NANOGrav observe a dark sector phase transition?, JCAP 11 (2023) 053 [2306.09411]

    2023 arXiv

  115. [122]

    Husdal,On Effective Degrees of Freedom in the Early Universe, Galaxies 4 (2016) 78 [1609.04979]

    L. Husdal,On Effective Degrees of Freedom in the Early Universe, Galaxies 4 (2016) 78 [1609.04979]

    2016 arXiv

  116. [123]

    Kamada, M

    A. Kamada, M. Kaplinghat, A.B. Pace and H.-B. Yu,How the Self-Interacting Dark Matter Model Explains the Diverse Galactic Rotation Curves, Phys. Rev. Lett.119 (2017) 111102 [1611.02716]

    2017 arXiv

  117. [124]

    T. Ren, A. Kwa, M. Kaplinghat and H.-B. Yu,Reconciling the Diversity and Uniformity of Galactic Rotation Curves with Self-Interacting Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. X 9 (2019) 031020 [1808.05695]

    2019 arXiv

  118. [125]

    Kaplinghat, T

    M. Kaplinghat, T. Ren and H.-B. Yu,Dark Matter Cores and Cusps in Spiral Galaxies and their Explanations, JCAP 06 (2020) 027 [1911.00544]

    2020 arXiv

  119. [126]

    Correa,Constraining velocity-dependent self-interacting dark matter with the Milky Way’s dwarf spheroidal galaxies, Mon

    C.A. Correa,Constraining velocity-dependent self-interacting dark matter with the Milky Way’s dwarf spheroidal galaxies, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.503 (2021) 920 [2007.02958]

    2021 arXiv

  120. [127]

    Minor, S

    Q.E. Minor, S. Gad-Nasr, M. Kaplinghat and S. Vegetti,An unexpected high concentration for the dark substructure in the gravitational lens SDSSJ0946+1006, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.507 (2021) 1662 [2011.10627]

    2021 arXiv

  121. [129]

    Kahlhoefer, K

    F. Kahlhoefer, K. Schmidt-Hoberg and S. Wild,Dark matter self-interactions from a general spin-0 mediator, JCAP 08 (2017) 003 [1704.02149]

    2017 arXiv

  122. [130]

    Khrapak, A.V

    S.A. Khrapak, A.V. Ivlev, G.E. Morfill and S.K. Zhdanov,Scattering in the Attractive Yukawa Potential in the Limit of Strong Interaction, Phys. Rev. Lett.90 (2003) 225002

    2003

  123. [131]

    Cyr-Racine, K

    F.-Y. Cyr-Racine, K. Sigurdson, J. Zavala, T. Bringmann, M. Vogelsberger and C. Pfrommer,ETHOS—an effective theory of structure formation: From dark particle – 26 – physics to the matter distribution of the Universe, Phys. Rev. D93 (2016) 123527 [1512.05344]

    2016 arXiv

  124. [132]

    Colquhoun, S

    B. Colquhoun, S. Heeba, F. Kahlhoefer, L. Sagunski and S. Tulin,Semiclassical regime for dark matter self-interactions, Phys. Rev. D103 (2021) 035006 [2011.04679]

    2021 arXiv

  125. [133]

    Kamada, T

    A. Kamada, T. Kuwahara and A. Patel,Quantum theory of dark matter scattering, JHEP 11 (2023) 105 [2303.17961]

    2023 arXiv

  126. [134]

    Archidiacono, D.C

    M. Archidiacono, D.C. Hooper, R. Murgia, S. Bohr, J. Lesgourgues and M. Viel, Constraining Dark Matter-Dark Radiation interactions with CMB, BAO, and Lyman-α, JCAP 10 (2019) 055 [1907.01496]

    2019 arXiv

  127. [135]

    de Salas and S

    P.F. de Salas and S. Pastor,Relic neutrino decoupling with flavour oscillations revisited, JCAP 07 (2016) 051 [1606.06986]

    2016 arXiv

  128. [136]

    Wainwright, S

    C. Wainwright, S. Profumo and M.J. Ramsey-Musolf,Gravity Waves from a Cosmological Phase Transition: Gauge Artifacts and Daisy Resummations, Phys. Rev. D84 (2011) 023521 [1104.5487]

    2011 arXiv

  129. [137]

    Chiang and E

    C.-W. Chiang and E. Senaha,On gauge dependence of gravitational waves from a first-order phase transition in classical scale-invariantU (1)′ models, Phys. Lett. B774 (2017) 489 [1707.06765]

    2017 arXiv

  130. [138]

    Coleman and E.J

    S.R. Coleman and E.J. Weinberg,Radiative Corrections as the Origin of Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking, Phys. Rev. D7 (1973) 1888

    1973

  131. [139]

    Delaunay, C

    C. Delaunay, C. Grojean and J.D. Wells,Dynamics of Non-renormalizable Electroweak Symmetry Breaking, JHEP 04 (2008) 029 [0711.2511]

    2008 arXiv

  132. [140]

    Anderson and L.J

    G.W. Anderson and L.J. Hall,The Electroweak phase transition and baryogenesis, Phys. Rev. D 45 (1992) 2685

    1992

  133. [141]

    Dolan and R

    L. Dolan and R. Jackiw,Symmetry Behavior at Finite Temperature, Phys. Rev. D9 (1974) 3320

    1974

  134. [142]

    Quiros,Finite temperature field theory and phase transitions, inICTP Summer School in High-Energy Physics and Cosmology, pp

    M. Quiros,Finite temperature field theory and phase transitions, inICTP Summer School in High-Energy Physics and Cosmology, pp. 187–259, 1, 1999 [hep-ph/9901312]

    1999 arXiv

  135. [143]

    Arnold and O

    P.B. Arnold and O. Espinosa,The Effective potential and first order phase transitions: Beyond leading-order, Phys. Rev. D47 (1993) 3546 [hep-ph/9212235]

    1993 arXiv

  136. [144]

    Guth and E.J

    A.H. Guth and E.J. Weinberg,Cosmological Consequences of a First Order Phase Transition in the SU(5) Grand Unified Model, Phys. Rev. D23 (1981) 876

    1981

  137. [145]

    Guth and S.H.H

    A.H. Guth and S.H.H. Tye,Phase Transitions and Magnetic Monopole Production in the Very Early Universe, Phys. Rev. Lett.44 (1980) 631

    1980

  138. [146]

    Megevand and S

    A. Megevand and S. Ramirez,Bubble nucleation and growth in very strong cosmological phase transitions, Nucl. Phys. B 919 (2017) 74 [1611.05853]

    2017 arXiv

  139. [147]

    Turner, E.J

    M.S. Turner, E.J. Weinberg and L.M. Widrow,Bubble nucleation in first order inflation and other cosmological phase transitions, Phys. Rev. D46 (1992) 2384

    1992

  140. [148]

    Kobakhidze, C

    A. Kobakhidze, C. Lagger, A. Manning and J. Yue,Gravitational waves from a supercooled electroweak phase transition and their detection with pulsar timing arrays, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 570 [1703.06552]

    2017 arXiv

  141. [149]

    Ellis, M

    J. Ellis, M. Lewicki and J.M. No,On the Maximal Strength of a First-Order Electroweak Phase Transition and its Gravitational Wave Signal, JCAP 04 (2019) 003 [1809.08242]. – 27 –

    2019 arXiv

  142. [150]

    Wang, F.P

    X. Wang, F.P. Huang and X. Zhang,Phase transition dynamics and gravitational wave spectra of strong first-order phase transition in supercooled universe, JCAP 05 (2020) 045 [2003.08892]

    2020 arXiv

  143. [151]

    R.-G. Cai, M. Sasaki and S.-J. Wang,The gravitational waves from the first-order phase transition with a dimension-six operator, JCAP 08 (2017) 004 [1707.03001]

    2017 arXiv

  144. [152]

    Coleman,The Fate of the False Vacuum

    S.R. Coleman,The Fate of the False Vacuum. 1. Semiclassical Theory, Phys. Rev. D15 (1977) 2929

    1977

  145. [153]

    Callan, Jr

    C.G. Callan, Jr. and S.R. Coleman,The Fate of the False Vacuum. 2. First Quantum Corrections, Phys. Rev. D16 (1977) 1762

    1977

  146. [154]

    Linde,Decay of the False Vacuum at Finite Temperature, Nucl

    A.D. Linde,Decay of the False Vacuum at Finite Temperature, Nucl. Phys. B 216 (1983) 421

    1983

  147. [155]

    Apreda, M

    R. Apreda, M. Maggiore, A. Nicolis and A. Riotto,Gravitational waves from electroweak phase transitions, Nucl. Phys. B 631 (2002) 342 [gr-qc/0107033]

    2002 arXiv

  148. [156]

    Wainwright,CosmoTransitions: Computing Cosmological Phase Transition Temperatures and Bubble Profiles with Multiple Fields, Comput

    C.L. Wainwright,CosmoTransitions: Computing Cosmological Phase Transition Temperatures and Bubble Profiles with Multiple Fields, Comput. Phys. Commun.183 (2012) 2006 [1109.4189]

    2012 arXiv

  149. [157]

    Athron, C

    P. Athron, C. Balazs, A. Fowlie, L. Morris, W. Searle, Y. Xiao et al.,PhaseTracer2: from the effective potential to gravitational waves, 2412.04881

    arXiv

  150. [158]

    Espinosa, T

    J.R. Espinosa, T. Konstandin, J.M. No and G. Servant,Energy Budget of Cosmological First-order Phase Transitions, JCAP 06 (2010) 028 [1004.4187]

    2010 arXiv

  151. [159]

    Bodeker and G.D

    D. Bodeker and G.D. Moore,Electroweak Bubble Wall Speed Limit, JCAP 05 (2017) 025 [1703.08215]

    2017 arXiv

  152. [160]

    Hindmarsh, S.J

    M. Hindmarsh, S.J. Huber, K. Rummukainen and D.J. Weir,Numerical simulations of acoustically generated gravitational waves at a first order phase transition, Phys. Rev. D92 (2015) 123009 [1504.03291]

    2015 arXiv

  153. [161]

    Schmitz,New Sensitivity Curves for Gravitational-Wave Signals from Cosmological Phase Transitions, JHEP 01 (2021) 097 [2002.04615]

    K. Schmitz,New Sensitivity Curves for Gravitational-Wave Signals from Cosmological Phase Transitions, JHEP 01 (2021) 097 [2002.04615]

    2021 arXiv

  154. [162]

    Moore and T

    G.D. Moore and T. Prokopec,How fast can the wall move? A Study of the electroweak phase transition dynamics, Phys. Rev. D52 (1995) 7182 [hep-ph/9506475]

    1995 arXiv

  155. [163]

    Megevand and A.D

    A. Megevand and A.D. Sanchez,Velocity of electroweak bubble walls, Nucl. Phys. B 825 (2010) 151 [0908.3663]

    2010 arXiv

  156. [164]

    Huber and M

    S.J. Huber and M. Sopena,An efficient approach to electroweak bubble velocities, 1302.1044

    arXiv

  157. [165]

    Konstandin, G

    T. Konstandin, G. Nardini and I. Rues,From Boltzmann equations to steady wall velocities, JCAP 09 (2014) 028 [1407.3132]

    2014 arXiv

  158. [166]

    Dorsch, S.J

    G.C. Dorsch, S.J. Huber and T. Konstandin,Bubble wall velocities in the Standard Model and beyond, JCAP 12 (2018) 034 [1809.04907]

    2018 arXiv

  159. [167]

    Laurent and J.M

    B. Laurent and J.M. Cline,First principles determination of bubble wall velocity, Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) 023501 [2204.13120]

    2022 arXiv

  160. [168]

    Wang, F.P

    X. Wang, F.P. Huang and X. Zhang,Bubble wall velocity beyond leading-log approximation in electroweak phase transition, 2011.12903. – 28 –

    2011 arXiv

  161. [169]

    Kamionkowski, A

    M. Kamionkowski, A. Kosowsky and M.S. Turner,Gravitational radiation from first order phase transitions, Phys. Rev. D49 (1994) 2837 [astro-ph/9310044]

    1994 arXiv

  162. [170]

    Kosowsky, M.S

    A. Kosowsky, M.S. Turner and R. Watkins,Gravitational radiation from colliding vacuum bubbles, Phys. Rev. D45 (1992) 4514

    1992

  163. [171]

    Kosowsky and M.S

    A. Kosowsky and M.S. Turner,Gravitational radiation from colliding vacuum bubbles: envelope approximation to many bubble collisions, Phys. Rev. D47 (1993) 4372 [astro-ph/9211004]

    1993 arXiv

  164. [172]

    Kosowsky, M.S

    A. Kosowsky, M.S. Turner and R. Watkins,Gravitational waves from first order cosmological phase transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett.69 (1992) 2026

    1992

  165. [173]

    Caprini, R

    C. Caprini, R. Durrer and G. Servant,Gravitational wave generation from bubble collisions in first-order phase transitions: An analytic approach, Phys. Rev. D77 (2008) 124015 [0711.2593]

    2008 arXiv

  166. [174]

    Huber and T

    S.J. Huber and T. Konstandin,Gravitational Wave Production by Collisions: More Bubbles, JCAP 09 (2008) 022 [0806.1828]

    2008 arXiv

  167. [175]

    Hindmarsh, S.J

    M. Hindmarsh, S.J. Huber, K. Rummukainen and D.J. Weir,Gravitational waves from the sound of a first order phase transition, Phys. Rev. Lett.112 (2014) 041301 [1304.2433]

    2014 arXiv

  168. [176]

    Giblin and J.B

    J.T. Giblin and J.B. Mertens,Gravitional radiation from first-order phase transitions in the presence of a fluid, Phys. Rev. D90 (2014) 023532 [1405.4005]

    2014 arXiv

  169. [177]

    Giblin, Jr

    J.T. Giblin, Jr. and J.B. Mertens,Vacuum Bubbles in the Presence of a Relativistic Fluid, JHEP 12 (2013) 042 [1310.2948]

    2013 arXiv

  170. [178]

    Caprini and R

    C. Caprini and R. Durrer,Gravitational waves from stochastic relativistic sources: Primordial turbulence and magnetic fields, Phys. Rev. D74 (2006) 063521 [astro-ph/0603476]

    2006 arXiv

  171. [179]

    Kahniashvili, L

    T. Kahniashvili, L. Campanelli, G. Gogoberidze, Y. Maravin and B. Ratra,Gravitational Radiation from Primordial Helical Inverse Cascade MHD Turbulence, Phys. Rev. D78 (2008) 123006 [0809.1899]

    2008 arXiv

  172. [180]

    Kahniashvili, A

    T. Kahniashvili, A. Kosowsky, G. Gogoberidze and Y. Maravin,Detectability of Gravitational Waves from Phase Transitions, Phys. Rev. D78 (2008) 043003 [0806.0293]

    2008 arXiv

  173. [181]

    Kahniashvili, L

    T. Kahniashvili, L. Kisslinger and T. Stevens,Gravitational Radiation Generated by Magnetic Fields in Cosmological Phase Transitions, Phys. Rev. D81 (2010) 023004 [0905.0643]

    2010 arXiv

  174. [182]

    Caprini, R

    C. Caprini, R. Durrer and G. Servant,The stochastic gravitational wave background from turbulence and magnetic fields generated by a first-order phase transition, JCAP 12 (2009) 024 [0909.0622]

    2009 arXiv

  175. [183]

    Kisslinger and T

    L. Kisslinger and T. Kahniashvili,Polarized Gravitational Waves from Cosmological Phase Transitions, Phys. Rev. D92 (2015) 043006 [1505.03680]

    2015 arXiv

  176. [184]

    Caprini et al.,Science with the space-based interferometer eLISA

    C. Caprini et al.,Science with the space-based interferometer eLISA. II: Gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions, JCAP 04 (2016) 001 [1512.06239]

    2016 arXiv

  177. [185]

    Caprini et al.,Detecting gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions with LISA: an update, JCAP 03 (2020) 024 [1910.13125]

    C. Caprini et al.,Detecting gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions with LISA: an update, JCAP 03 (2020) 024 [1910.13125]

    2020 arXiv

  178. [186]

    Janssen et al.,Gravitational wave astronomy with the SKA, PoS AASKA14 (2015) 037 [1501.00127]

    G. Janssen et al.,Gravitational wave astronomy with the SKA, PoS AASKA14 (2015) 037 [1501.00127]. – 29 –

    2015 arXiv

  179. [187]

    LISA collaboration, Laser Interferometer Space Antenna, 1702.00786

    arXiv

  180. [188]

    Thrane and J.D

    E. Thrane and J.D. Romano,Sensitivity curves for searches for gravitational-wave backgrounds, Phys. Rev. D88 (2013) 124032 [1310.5300]. – 30 –

    2013 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.