Photonic heat amplifiers based on a disordered semiconductor

Alessandro Braggio; Francesco Giazotto; Giorgio De Simoni; Matteo Pioldi

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 70 references

Photonic heat amplifiers based on a disordered semiconductor

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A three-terminal photonic device is predicted to amplify heat currents and temperature swings at millikelvin temperatures.

desk verdict A plausible new mechanism for a photonic heat amplifier, but the headline gains depend on a purely resistive impedance assumption that is likely violated in the operating window. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.04250 v3 pith:RVZBR5DQ submitted 2025-02-06 cond-mat.mes-hall

Matteo Pioldi , Giorgio De Simoni , Alessandro Braggio , Francesco Giazotto This is my paper · ORCID

classification cond-mat.mes-hall

keywords photonicheattransportnegativedifferentialthermalconductancetransistoramplifiervariablerangehoppingNTDgermaniummillikelvincryogenicsquantummanagement

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper predicts a thermal transistor and amplifier that works where cryogenic quantum circuits operate, around tens to hundreds of millikelvin. The device connects two reservoirs of a disordered semiconductor (a variable-range-hopping material) by lossless lines, so heat travels as photons. Because the semiconductor's electrical impedance changes steeply with temperature, the efficiency of photonic heat transfer rises as the two reservoirs approach the same temperature, producing negative differential thermal conductance. The authors show this effect can be wired into a three-terminal device in which a small gate signal controls a much larger source-drain heat flow, with predicted current amplification up to 15 and temperature amplification up to 3.3. If realized, the photonic heat amplifier fills a known gap: a thermal counterpart to the electrical transistor at subkelvin temperatures.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the photonic heat current between two reservoirs, $J_\gamma = \int_0^\infty \frac{\hbar\omega}{2\pi}\,\tau(\omega,T_s,T_1)\,[n_s(\omega)-n_1(\omega)]\,d\omega$, with the transmission coefficient $\tau = 4\,\mathrm{Re}[Z_s]\,\mathrm{Re}[Z_1]/|Z_s+Z_1|^2$. For reservoirs made of variable-range-hopping semiconductor, modeled with resistivity $\rho = [\sigma_{DC}\exp(-\sqrt{T_a/T}) + A\omega(1-e^{-\hbar\omega/k_B T})]^{-1}$, the transmission coefficient varies strongly with temperature, which is what creates NDTC. Around this photonic channel the paper builds a three-terminal heat balance: source photonic input, NIN tunnel heat from gate and drain, and electron-phonon loss to the bath, whose solution gives the island temperature and all gains. The machinery's role is to convert a temperature-dependent impedance mismatch into controlled heat-flow amplification.

What would settle it

Measure the photonic heat current between two variable-range-hopping reservoirs with the source fixed at 1.4 K while sweeping the cold-side temperature from 20 mK upward; if the heat current never increases as $T_1$ rises (that is, the differential conductance $\kappa_\gamma$ never becomes negative), the NDTC and the amplifier gains predicted here do not occur. A second check is to measure the complex impedance of the reservoir in the 0.1-100 GHz range at these temperatures; a strong reactive component or a frequency dependence much stronger than the model would break the impedance-matching condition that produces the gain.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that photonic heat transport between two variable-range-hopping reservoirs naturally produces negative differential thermal conductance (NDTC), and that this NDTC can be harnessed in a three-terminal device. With the source held at 1.4 K and the central island colder, the thermal transmission coefficient $\tau$ of the photonic channel grows as $T_1$ approaches $T_s$, because the temperature-dependent reservoir impedances become better matched. This improvement can outweigh the shrinking temperature difference, so the heat current increases even as the gradient decreases. The authors integrate this channel with tunnel contacts to a gate and a drain and solve the heat balance of the central island; for the current-modulation amplifier they report amplification factors up to 15 at both source and drain, and for the temperature-modulation amplifier a maximum differential gain $G = 3.3$. They also propose a fully photonic variant in which all terminals exchange heat only through photonic modes.

Load-bearing premise

The calculation stands on the assumption that each semiconductor reservoir behaves as a purely resistive, temperature-dependent impedance over the frequencies that carry heat, with no significant reactive or extra frequency response, and that the heavily doped contact regions thermalize with the bulk on the device's operating timescale.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

A working photonic heat amplifier would provide the first practical thermal transistor in the millikelvin range, enabling on-chip heat routing and thermal logic in cryogenic quantum circuits.
In temperature-modulation mode, the device acts as a preamplifier for bolometers and solid-state thermometers, with predicted input-referred noise equivalent temperature around $6.7\,\mu\mathrm{K}/\sqrt{\mathrm{Hz}}$.
The fully photonic variant allows thermal connections over macroscopic distances without galvanic coupling, reducing cross-talk and ground-loop issues.
The amplifying effect is not restricted to variable-range hopping; the paper notes that a Mott-insulator version works with reduced control, so the mechanism may extend to other strongly temperature-dependent resistive materials.
The predicted bandwidth of order MHz places the amplifier in line with existing microscopic thermal switches, allowing fast thermal signal processing.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Beyond the paper: if the predicted NDTC is confirmed in a single photonic link, the same impedance-matching mechanism could be used to build heat diodes, heat memories, and self-oscillating thermal circuits, since the reported bistability already hints at memory behavior.
Beyond the paper: the calculation assumes purely dissipative reservoir impedances; a natural next test is to measure the complex impedance of an NTD germanium reservoir from about 0.1 to 100 GHz at millikelvin temperatures, because any reactive part would change the matching condition and the gain.
Beyond the paper: one could look for NDTC in other strongly temperature-dependent materials, such as doped semiconductors or Mott insulators, and compare the predicted gain curves with the variable-range-hopping results to see how general the mechanism is.
Beyond the paper: if the gain and noise figures survive in a real device, the amplifier could be inserted between a superconducting qubit and its heat bath as an active thermal buffer, a use the paper does not explicitly develop.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The core idea is genuinely new: using the strong temperature dependence of variable-range-hopping conductivity to create impedance matching that produces NDTC, then wiring that into a three-terminal amplifier. The authors work through the photonic heat transport formalism carefully, and the parameter exploration (Figs. 3-5) is thorough. I checked Eq. 14; the apparent omission of kappa_g is fine because the current gain is computed along the gate-biased solution curve. The fully photonic variant is a nice touch, and the noise estimates give concrete NEP/NET numbers rather than stopping at the gain curve. The central mechanism, temperature-dependent impedance matching, is physically sensible and grounded in established formulas and measured NTD germanium parameters, so this is not a crackpot proposal.

The soft spots are real, though. The load-bearing assumption is that the VRH reservoirs can be treated as purely dissipative, frequency-independent impedances in the gain window. The stress-test estimate of geometric capacitance is sobering: for a 1 um Ge island at T1 = 0.3 K, the capacitive reactance at the thermally active frequency is comparable to the hopping resistance, so the impedance is not purely resistive. The paper's justification (Fig. 1c) that frequency dependence is negligible for T1 > 0.5 K does not cover the NDTC/gain region, where T1 sits around 0.3-0.4 K. This is not a minor caveat; it can shift or suppress the NDTC and change the quoted gains of 15 and 3.3. The authors are explicit about the assumption, which earns credit, but they do not test its robustness.

There is also an overclaim in the abstract about addressing the 'lack' of mK thermal transistors, given the demonstrated heat transistor in Ref. [7] (even if that device is not purely photonic). And the quantitative figures (NEP, SFDR, IAR/OAR) rest on idealized assumptions--perfect contact thermalization, uniform island temperature, no uncertainty propagation--so they should be read as indicative, not predictive.

Bottom line: the mechanism is plausible, the derivations are internally consistent, and the proposal deserves serious refereeing. The referee should ask for a complex impedance model (including geometric capacitance and AC conductivity) in the NDTC window, and for a check of whether the gain peaks survive. If the complex-Z corrections wash out the effect, the paper becomes a much weaker proposal; if the effect survives, it is a meaningful step toward photonic thermal logic. I would send it to review with a request for that analysis, and I would cite it if the complex-Z question gets resolved.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes and analyzes a three-terminal photonic heat amplifier (PHA) for the mK temperature range. Two variable-range-hopping (VRH) reservoirs are connected by lossless superconducting lines, and the strong temperature dependence of the VRH impedance produces negative differential thermal conductance (NDTC). A central island is tunnel-coupled to gate and drain terminals; solving the stationary heat balance determines the island temperature. The authors present two optimized configurations: a current modulation amplifier (CMA) with predicted source/drain amplification factors up to about 15 and a temperature modulation amplifier (TMA) with a maximum temperature gain G≈3.3. They also estimate bandwidth, spurious-free dynamic range, noise-equivalent power, and sketch a fully photonic variant.

Significance. If the predictions hold, this is a concrete proposal for a thermal transistor/amplifier operating at sub-Kelvin temperatures, built from established photonic heat transport and well-characterized NTD germanium parameters. The derivation is explicit, the parameters are listed in Table I, and the predicted figures of merit are specific and falsifiable, which is a strength. However, the central quantitative claims rest on the idealized assumption that the VRH reservoirs are purely resistive. The load-bearing character of that assumption is not addressed in the manuscript, so the values α≈15 and G≈3.3 should be regarded as provisional until the complex-impedance question is resolved.

major comments (2)

[Sec. II, Eq. (4), Table I, Figs. 4-5] The central quantitative claims (α≈15 in Fig. 4(a), G≈3.3 in Fig. 5(b)) are computed with the purely resistive reservoir impedance of Eq. (4), based on the statement in Sec. II that "we can neglect any capacitive and inductive components of the reservoirs." This assumption is load-bearing precisely in the NDTC/gain window. For the CMA central island (V=10^-18 m^3, Table I), modeled as a ~1 µm Ge cube with ε_r≈16, the geometric capacitance between the two heavily doped contacts is C≈0.14 fF; at T1≈0.3-0.5 K the thermally relevant photon frequencies are of order 6-18 GHz, giving |X_C|≈60-190 kΩ, comparable to the hopping resistance R≈200-300 kΩ from Eq. (4). The impedance is therefore substantially complex, with a phase of order tens of degrees, and Eq. (1) for τ should be re-evaluated with a complex Z (e.g., a parallel RC or a distributed RC model). Because the ratio |X_C|/R changes rapidly with T1 in the 0.2-0.5 K range, the impedance-matching peak, the NDTC region, and the amplification factors of Figs. 4-5 can shift or disappear. Please either include the complex impedance in the calculation of τ and κγ, or provide a quantitative justification based on the actual geometry, contact area, and doping profile for neglecting displacement currents in the relevant frequency and temperature window.
[Sec. II and Sec. III, Eqs. (9)-(17)] The model treats the entire central island, including the heavily doped contact regions, as a single lumped electronic temperature T1. The text asserts that the heavily doped regions thermalize with the bulk on a timescale much shorter than the device operating timescale, but no estimate is provided for the electron-electron thermalization time in the metallic contact regions or for the internal thermal diffusion time across the VRH island. Since the TMA gain G=∂T1/∂Tg and the CMA gains α_i all rely on this single-temperature description, please provide an order-of-magnitude estimate for these internal timescales and show that they are short compared with the relaxation time τrel estimated in Sec. III C.

minor comments (5)

[Sec. II, after Eq. (2)] The text refers to "the PHA ... as shown in Fig. 1(c)", but the three-terminal device diagram is in Fig. 1(d); please correct the cross-reference.
[Fig. 2 caption] The differential thermal conductance is denoted gγ in the caption but κγ in Eq. (6) and elsewhere; please unify the notation.
[Eq. (C3), Sec. IV A] The noise spectral densities in Appendix C are not explicitly defined as single-sided or double-sided; since the NEP values in Sec. IV A depend on this convention, please state it.
[Sec. III C, first sentence] The sentence beginning "Another important figure of merit in the device is the relaxation time, τrel, for the temperature of the electrons on the central island to assess the amplifier's bandwidth" is grammatically incomplete; please rephrase.
[Table I] The volume entries are formatted inconsistently ("10−18" vs "5 ×10−19"); please use a uniform scientific notation and specify that χ is dimensionless.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the predicted gains are computed outputs from externally grounded photonic and VRH transport models with design parameters, not fitted inputs.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained against external literature. The photonic heat current is obtained from the standard circuit expression (Eqs. 1-2, Ref. [25]); the VRH impedance is taken from measured and theoretical NTD-germanium conductivity (Eq. 4, Refs. [33-36]); tunnel heat (Eq. 7) and electron-phonon losses (Eq. 8) are standard results [11, 30]. The NDTC of Sec. II is a computed consequence of the temperature-dependent impedance matching in Eq. (1), not an assumption equivalent to the claimed amplifier gains. The device parameters in Table I are design choices, and the amplification factors alpha_i = |kappa_i/(kappa_d + kappa_gamma + kappa_ph)| (Eq. 14) and G = partial T1 / partial Tg (Eq. 17) are obtained by solving the heat-balance equation (Eq. 9) and differentiating its solution; they are outputs, not fitted quantities. Although several references are authored by the same group (e.g., Refs. [19, 38, 43, 45, 50, 57]), none carries a load-bearing uniqueness or existence claim that replaces an independent derivation; Eq. (14), attributed to Ref. [38], is an elementary implicit-differentiation identity that follows directly from current conservation, so the central result does not reduce to a self-citation. The stated assumptions that are potentially fragile (purely resistive reservoirs, negligible frequency dependence, thermalized heavily doped contacts) are model-correctness risks, not circular inputs: they constrain the model but are not defined in terms of the predicted gains. I find no step in which a prediction is equivalent by construction to its input, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 9 free parameters · 9 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a chain of modeling assumptions, most of which are standard in mesoscopic photonic heat transport and drawn from cited literature. The main non-standard choices are the VRH material model with its fitted material constants, the neglect of reactive impedance components, and the ideal thermalization assumptions. These are domain assumptions rather than mathematically unproved axioms. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (9)

chi (geometric mismatch factor) = 5
Introduced in Eq. 5 and chosen to enhance the low-temperature transmission coefficient; the paper states 'we will always assume that it equals 5' (Sec. II, Table I). This design choice directly affects the NDTC strength and all gain figures.
Ta (VRH characteristic temperature) = 50 K
Characterizes the exponential resistance rise in Eq. 3. The paper uses Ta = 50 K for the main device and notes that NDTC depends on Ta (Fig. 2c,d); it is a material/doping parameter taken from literature, not a derived quantity.
sigma_DC = 1.5 (Ohm um)^-1
DC conductivity parameter in Eq. 4, taken from Ref. [36]. It sets the overall resistance scale and hence the impedance matching temperature.
A = 0.05 (Ohm m GHz)^-1
AC conductivity coefficient in Eq. 4, taken from Ref. [35]. It controls the low-temperature saturation of the photonic heat current and the low-T behavior of NDTC.
Rg, Rd (tunnel resistances) = CMA: 40/20 kOhm; TMA: 20/20 kOhm
Design parameters in Table I. They set the gate and drain thermal conductances and thus the operating point and gain.
V (central island volume) = CMA: 1e-18 m^3; TMA: 5e-19 m^3
Design parameters in Table I. They determine the electron-phonon coupling strength and the relaxation time (Eq. 8, 12).
Sigma (electron-phonon coupling) = 1e7 W m^-3 K^-6
Material parameter for NTD germanium taken from Ref. [30] and used in Eq. 8. It sets the phonon heat leak.
gamma (specific heat coefficient) = 1 J m^-3 K^-2
Electronic specific heat coefficient from Ref. [41], used in Eq. 12 for the relaxation time and bandwidth estimate.
Ts, Tb (operating temperatures) = Ts = 1.4 K, Tb = 20 mK
Chosen operating points in Table I. The source temperature is a tuning parameter and the bath temperature is the cryostat base temperature.

assumptions (9)

standard math Photonic heat transport between two impedances follows the lumped-element circuit formula with transmission coefficient tau = 4 Re[Zs] Re[Z1] / |Zs+Z1|^2 (Eq. 1) and heat current integral (Eq. 2).
Standard result in mesoscopic circuit quantum electrodynamics, cited to Ref. [25].
domain assumption The VRH reservoirs are purely dissipative impedances with negligible reactive (capacitive/inductive) components in the operating frequency range.
Stated in Sec. II: 'we can neglect any capacitive and inductive components of the reservoirs. We assume purely dissipative impedances.' This is critical for the simple impedance-matching picture.
domain assumption The lossless superconducting lines thermalize at the bath temperature and suppress quasiparticle exchange, so only photon heat flows between reservoirs.
Assumed in Sec. II based on Refs. [19,28]. It defines the photonic transport channel.
domain assumption The resistivity of NTD germanium is described by Eq. 4 with the given DC and AC conductivity forms and parameters.
The paper states this is based on Refs. [33-35] and experimental data [35,36]. The specific functional form and parameters are load-bearing for the predicted NDTC.
domain assumption Tunnel contacts to the heavily doped metallic regions behave as NIN junctions with heat current given by Eq. 7 and temperature-independent resistance (Wiedemann-Franz).
Stated in Sec. III A and the footnote: 'we are simply assuming that Wiedemann-Franz laws apply to the junction.' This is used for the gate and drain heat currents.
domain assumption The electron-phonon heat loss from the central island follows Jph = Sigma V (T1^6 - Tb^6) with Sigma from Ref. [30].
Used in Eq. 8 and the heat balance equation (Eq. 9). The T^6 power law is specific to the disordered semiconductor at low temperature.
domain assumption The electronic specific heat of the VRH island is linear in T1 with gamma = 1 J m^-3 K^-2.
Used in Sec. III C for the relaxation time estimate. The paper acknowledges the specific heat may flatten at lower temperatures due to spin-exchange clusters, but claims it is outside the operating range.
domain assumption The VRH island can be described by a single uniform electron temperature T1 and the heavily doped contact regions thermalize on timescales much shorter than the operating timescale.
Implicit in the heat balance (Eq. 9) and explicitly assumed in Sec. II and Appendix C. Without this, the lumped thermal model breaks down.
domain assumption In the noise estimates (Appendix C), the thermal transmission tau is approximated as frequency-independent and taken out of the integral.
The paper says 'for simplicity, we will assume a frequency-independent model of two purely dissipative impedances.' This affects the NEP and NET estimates.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Photonic heat amplifiers based on a disordered semiconductor." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RVZBR5DQ

@misc{pith2026250204250,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Photonic heat amplifiers based on a disordered semiconductor},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RVZBR5DQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.04250}
}

read the original abstract

A photonic heat amplifier (PHA) designed for cryogenic operations is introduced and analyzed. This device comprises two variable-range-hopping reservoirs connected by lossless lines, which allow them to exchange heat through photonic modes. This configuration enables negative differential thermal conductance (NDTC), which can be harnessed to amplify thermal signals. To achieve this, one reservoir is maintained at a high temperature, serving as the source terminal of a thermal transistor. Concurrently, in the other one, we establish tunnel contacts to metallic reservoirs, which function as the gate and drain terminals. With this arrangement, it is possible to control the heat flux exchange between the source and drain by adjusting the gate temperature. We present two different parameter choices that yield different performances: the first emphasizes modulating the source-drain heat current, while the second focuses on the modulation of the colder temperature variable range hopping reservoir. Lastly, we present a potential design variation in which all electronic reservoirs are thermally connected through only photonic modes, allowing interactions between distant elements. The proposal of the PHA addresses the lack of thermal transistors and amplifiers in the mK range while being compatible with the rich toolbox of circuit quantum electrodynamics. It can be adapted to various applications, including sensing and developing thermal circuits and control devices at sub-Kelvin temperatures, which are relevant to quantum technologies.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.04250 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** FIG. 2. In all the plots of this figure, quantities are evalu [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (3 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. The plots of this image represent the behavior of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5. The plots of this image represent the behavior of a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: FIG. 6. A possible variation on the design of Fig. 1 features [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 59 canonical work pages

[7]

Saira, M

O.-P. Saira, M. Meschke, F. Giazotto, A. M. Savin, M. M¨ ott¨ onen, and J. P. Pekola, Heat transistor: Demon- stration of gate-controlled electronic refrigeration, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 027203 (2007). 13

work page 2007
[1]

Fornieri and F

A. Fornieri and F. Giazotto, Towards phase-coherent caloritronics in superconducting circuits, Nat. Nanotech- nol. 12, 944 (2017)

work page 2017
[2]

X. Siqi, Z. Hongxin, Z. Xing, and W. Haidong, A brief review on the recent development of phonon engineering and manipulation at nanoscales, Int. J. Extreme Manuf. 6, 012007 (2023)

work page 2023
[3]

Ibabe, G

´A. Ibabe, G. O. Steffensen, I. Casal, M. G´ omez, T. Kanne, J. Nyg ˚ ard, A. Levy Yeyati, and E. J. H. Lee, Heat dissipation mechanisms in hybrid superconductor– semiconductor devices revealed by joule spectroscopy, Nano Lett. 24, 6488 (2024)

work page 2024
[5]

Swoboda, K

T. Swoboda, K. Klinar, A. S. Yalamarthy, A. Kitanovski, and M. M. Rojo, Solid-state thermal control devices, Adv. Electron. Mater. 7, 2000625 (2021)

work page 2021
[6]

Castelli, Q

L. Castelli, Q. Zhu, T. J. Shimokusu, and G. Wehmeyer, A three-terminal magnetic thermal transistor, Nat. Com- mun. 14, 393 (2023)

2023
[8]

Krinner, S

S. Krinner, S. Storz, P. Kurpiers, P. Magnard, J. Hein- soo, R. Keller, J. L¨ utolf, C. Eichler, and A. Wallraff, Engineering cryogenic setups for 100-qubit scale super- conducting circuit systems, EPJ Quantum Technol. 6, 2 (2019)

work page 2019
[9]

Somoroff, Q

A. Somoroff, Q. Ficheux, R. A. Mencia, H. Xiong, R. Kuzmin, and V. E. Manucharyan, Millisecond coher- ence in a superconducting qubit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 267001 (2023)

2023

Show all 70 references

[10]

Romanenko, R

A. Romanenko, R. Pilipenko, S. Zorzetti, D. Frolov, M. Awida, S. Belomestnykh, S. Posen, and A. Gras- sellino, Three-dimensional superconducting resonators at 20 mK with photon lifetimes up to τ = 2 s, Phys. Rev. Appl. 13, 034032 (2020)

2020
[11]

Giazotto, T

F. Giazotto, T. T. Heikkil¨ a, A. Luukanen, A. M. Savin, and J. P. Pekola, Opportunities for mesoscopics in ther- mometry and refrigeration: Physics and applications, Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 217 (2006)

2006
[12]

Meschke, W

M. Meschke, W. Guichard, and J. P. Pekola, Single-mode heat conduction by photons, Nature 444, 187 (2006)

2006
[13]

Ojanen and A.-P

T. Ojanen and A.-P. Jauho, Mesoscopic photon heat transistor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 155902 (2008)

2008
[14]

Partanen, K

M. Partanen, K. Y. Tan, J. Govenius, R. E. Lake, M. K. M¨ akel¨ a, T. Tanttu, and M. M¨ ott¨ onen, Quantum-limited heat conduction over macroscopic distances, Nat. Phys. 12, 460 (2016)

2016
[15]

Ronzani, B

A. Ronzani, B. Karimi, J. Senior, Y.-C. Chang, J. T. Peltonen, C. Chen, and J. P. Pekola, Tunable photonic heat transport in a quantum heat valve, Nat. Phys. 14, 991 (2018)

2018
[16]

Subero, O

D. Subero, O. Maillet, D. S. Golubev, G. Thomas, J. T. Peltonen, B. Karimi, M. Mar ´ ın-Su´ arez, A. L. Yeyati, R. S´ anchez, S. Park, and J. P. Pekola, Bolometric de- tection of Josephson inductance in a highly resistive en- vironment, Nat. Commun. 14, 7924 (2023)

2023
[17]

Iorio, E

A. Iorio, E. Strambini, G. Haack, M. Campisi, and F. Gi- azotto, Photonic heat rectification in a system of coupled qubits, Phys. Rev. Appl. 15, 054050 (2021)

2021
[18]

J. P. Pekola and B. Karimi, Colloquium: Quantum heat transport in condensed matter systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 041001 (2021)

2021
[19]

Marchegiani, A

G. Marchegiani, A. Braggio, and F. Giazotto, Highly effi- cient phase-tunable photonic thermal diode, Appl. Phys. Lett. 118, 022602 (2021)

2021
[20]

Senior, A

J. Senior, A. Gubaydullin, B. Karimi, J. T. Peltonen, J. Ankerhold, and J. P. Pekola, Heat rectification via a superconducting artificial atom, Commun. Phys. 3, 40 (2020)

2020
[21]

Gubaydullin, G

A. Gubaydullin, G. Thomas, D. S. Golubev, D. Lvov, J. T. Peltonen, and J. P. Pekola, Photonic heat transport in three terminal superconducting circuit, Nat. Commun. 13, 1552 (2022)

2022
[22]

B. Li, L. Wang, and G. Casati, Negative differential ther- mal resistance and thermal transistor, Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 143501 (2006)

2006
[23]

Jiang, M

J.-H. Jiang, M. Kulkarni, D. Segal, and Y. Imry, Phonon thermoelectric transistors and rectifiers, Phys. Rev. B92, 045309 (2015)

2015
[24]

Rongqian, W

W. Rongqian, W. Chen, L. Jincheng, and J. Jian-Hua, In- elastic thermoelectric transport and fluctuations in meso- scopic systems, Adv. Phys.: X 7, 2082317 (2022)

2022
[25]

L. M. A. Pascal, H. Courtois, and F. W. J. Hekking, Circuit approach to photonic heat transport, Phys. Rev. B 83, 125113 (2011)

2011
[26]

A. L. Efros and B. I. Shklovskii, Coulomb gap and low temperature conductivity of disordered systems, J. Phys. C 8, L49 (1975)

1975
[27]

Majland, K

M. Majland, K. S. Christensen, and N. T. Zinner, Quan- tum thermal transistor in superconducting circuits, Phys. Rev. B 101, 184510 (2020)

2020
[28]

D. R. Schmidt, R. J. Schoelkopf, and A. N. Cle- land, Photon-mediated thermal relaxation of electrons in nanostructures, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 045901 (2004)

2004
[29]

S. S. Dey, G. Timossi, L. Amico, and G. Marchegiani, Negative differential thermal conductance by photonic transport in electronic circuits, Phys. Rev. B107, 134510 (2023)

2023
[30]

N. Wang, F. Wellstood, B. Sadoulet, E. E. Haller, and J. Beeman, Electrical and thermal properties of neutron- transmutation-doped Ge at 20 mK, Phys. Rev. B 41, 3761 (1990)

1990
[31]

E. E. Haller, K. M. Itoh, and J. W. Beeman, Neu- tron transmutation doped (NTD) germanium thermis- tors for sub-mm bolometer applications, in Submillime- tre and Far-Infrared Space Instrumentation, Proceedings of the 30th ESLAB Symposium held in Noordwijk, 24- 26 September 199...

1996
[32]

McCammon, Semiconductor thermistors, in Cryogenic Particle Detection (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2005)

D. McCammon, Semiconductor thermistors, in Cryogenic Particle Detection (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2005)

2005
[33]

B. I. Shklovskii and A. L. Efros, Zero-phonon ac hopping conductivity of disordered system, Sov. Phys JETP 54, 218 (1981)

1981
[34]

Bottger, V

H. Bottger, V. V. Bryksin, and G. Y. Yashin, Cluster ap- proximation in the theory of the ac hopping conductivity in disordered systems. ii. the three-dimensional case, J. Phys. C 12, 3951 (1979)

1979
[35]

H. F. Jang, G. Cripps, and T. Timusk, Far-infrared absorption of neutron-transmutation-doped germanium, Phys. Rev. B 41, 5152 (1990)

1990
[36]

Pasca, Ph.D

E. Pasca, Ph.D. thesis, Universit` a degli studi di Firenze (2004)

2004
[37]

B. I. Shklovskii, Half-century of efros–shklovskii coulomb gap: Romance with coulomb interaction and disorder, Low Temp. Phys. 50, 1101 (2024)

2024
[38]

Fornieri, G

A. Fornieri, G. Timossi, R. Bosisio, P. Solinas, and F. Gi- azotto, Negative differential thermal conductance and heat amplification in superconducting hybrid devices, Phys. Rev. B 93, 134508 (2016)

2016
[39]

Olivieri, M

E. Olivieri, M. Barucci, J. Beeman, L. Risegari, and G. Ventura, Excess heat capacity in NTD Ge thermis- tors, J. Low Temp. Phys. 143, 153 (2006)

2006
[40]

Vischi, M

F. Vischi, M. Carrega, A. Braggio, F. Paolucci, F. Bianco, S. Roddaro, and F. Giazotto, Electron cooling with graphene-insulator-superconductor tunnel junctions for applications in fast bolometry, Phys. Rev. Appl. 13, 054006 (2020)

2020
[41]

L’Hˆ ote, X

D. L’Hˆ ote, X. F. Navick, R. Tourbot, J. Mangin, and F. Pesty, Charge and heat collection in a 70 g heat/ionization cryogenic detector for dark matter search, J. Appl. Phys. 87, 1507 (2000)

2000
[42]

L. Man, W. Huan, M. A. Erin, Q. Zihao, P. G. Dominic, D. N. Huu, L. Tianhan, S. W. Paul, and H. Yongjie, Electrically gated molecular thermal switch, Science382, 585 (2023)

2023
[43]

Paolucci, G

F. Paolucci, G. Marchegiani, E. Strambini, and F. Gi- azotto, Phase-tunable temperature amplifier, Europhys. 14 Lett. 118, 68004 (2017)

2017
[44]

to power other processes. Complete control of spu- rious heat can be helpful in power operations that have already been demonstrated, such as refrigerators compat- ible with photon-mediated heat transport [53, 54]. Autonomous temperature control based on fully ther- mal logic ...

2020
[45]

Y. Li, Y. Dang, S. Zhang, X. Li, Y. Jin, P. Ben-Abdallah, J. Xu, and Y. Ma, Radiative thermal transistor, Phys. Rev. Appl. 20, 024061 (2023)

2023
[46]

De Simoni and F

G. De Simoni and F. Giazotto, Ultralinear magnetic- flux-to-voltage conversion in superconducting quantum interference proximity transistors, Phys. Rev. Appl. 19, 054021 (2023)

2023
[47]

A. L. Efros and B. I. Shklovskii, Electronic Properties of Doped Semiconductors (Spinger-Verlag, Heidelberg, 1984)

1984
[48]

Gasparinetti, K

S. Gasparinetti, K. L. Viisanen, O.-P. Saira, T. Faivre, M. Arzeo, M. Meschke, and J. P. Pekola, Fast elec- tron thermometry for ultrasensitive calorimetric detec- tion, Phys. Rev. Appl. 3, 014007 (2015)

2015
[49]

Ben-Abdallah and S.-A

P. Ben-Abdallah and S.-A. Biehs, Near-field thermal transistor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 044301 (2014)

2014
[50]

Wang and B

L. Wang and B. Li, Thermal logic gates: Computation with phonons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 177208 (2007)

2007
[51]

Paolucci, G

F. Paolucci, G. Marchegiani, E. Strambini, and F. Gi- azotto, Phase-tunable thermal logic: Computation with heat, Phys. Rev. Appl. 10, 024003 (2018)

2018
[52]

Blais, A

A. Blais, A. L. Grimsmo, S. M. Girvin, and A. Wallraff, Circuit quantum electrodynamics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 025005 (2021)

2021
[53]

J. P. Pekola, Towards quantum thermodynamics in elec- tronic circuits, Nat. Phys. 11, 118 (2015)

2015
[54]

M. A. Aamir, P. Jamet Suria, J. Mar ´ ın Guzm´ an, C. Castillo-Moreno, J. M. Epstein, N. Yunger Halpern, and S. Gasparinetti, Thermally driven quantum refriger- ator autonomously resets a superconducting qubit, Nat. Phys. 10.1038/s41567-024-02708-5 (2025)

2025 doi
[55]

Kivij¨ arvi, A

H. Kivij¨ arvi, A. Viitanen, T. M¨ orstedt, and M. M¨ ott¨ onen, Noise-induced quantum-circuit re- frigeration, arXiv:2412.05886

arXiv
[56]

C. D. Satrya, Y.-C. Chang, A. S. Strelnikov, R. Upad- hyay, I. K. M¨ akinen, J. T. Peltonen, B. Karimi, and J. P. Pekola, Thermal spectrometer for superconducting cir- cuits, Nat. Commun. 16, 4435 (2025)

2025
[57]

Maillet, D

O. Maillet, D. Subero, J. T. Peltonen, D. S. Golubev, and J. P. Pekola, Electric field control of radiative heat transfer in a superconducting circuit, Nat. Commun. 11, 4326 (2020)

2020
[58]

Paolucci, G

F. Paolucci, G. Timossi, P. Solinas, and F. Giazotto, Coherent manipulation of thermal transport by tun- able electron-photon and electron-phonon interaction, J. Appl. Phys. 121, 244305 (2017)

2017
[59]

Yoshioka, H

T. Yoshioka, H. Mukai, A. Tomonaga, S. Takada, Y. Okazaki, N.-H. Kaneko, S. Nakamura, and J.-S. Tsai, Active initialization experiment of a superconducting qubit using a quantum circuit refrigerator, Phys. Rev. Appl. 20, 044077 (2023)

2023
[60]

Nakamura, T

S. Nakamura, T. Yoshioka, S. Lemziakov, D. Lvov, H. Mukai, A. Tomonaga, S. Takada, Y. Okazaki, N.-H. Kaneko, J. Pekola, and J.-S. Tsai, Probing fast quantum circuit refrigeration in the quantum regime, Phys. Rev. Appl. 23, L011003 (2025)

2025
[61]

Kubytskyi, S.-A

V. Kubytskyi, S.-A. Biehs, and P. Ben-Abdallah, Radia- tive bistability and thermal memory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 074301 (2014)

2014
[62]

Rogovin and D

D. Rogovin and D. J. Scalapino, Fluctuation phenomena in tunnel junctions, Ann. Phys. 86, 1 (1974)

1974
[63]

Golubev and L

D. Golubev and L. Kuzmin, Nonequilibrium theory of a hot-electron bolometer with normal metal-insulator- superconductor tunnel junction, J. Appl. Phys. 89, 6464 (2001)

2001
[64]

D. S. Golubev and J. P. Pekola, Statistics of heat ex- change between two resistors, Phys. Rev. B 92, 085412 (2015)

2015
[65]

O. S. Lumbroso, L. Simine, A. Nitzan, D. Segal, and O. Tal, Electronic noise due to temperature differences in atomic-scale junctions, Nature 562, 240 (2018)

2018
[66]

Sivre, H

E. Sivre, H. Duprez, A. Anthore, A. Aassime, F. D. Parmentier, A. Cavanna, A. Ouerghi, U. Gennser, and F. Pierre, Electronic heat flow and thermal shot noise in quantum circuits, Nat. Commun. 10, 5638 (2019)

2019
[67]

Larocque, E

S. Larocque, E. Pinsolle, C. Lupien, and B. Reulet, Shot noise of a temperature-biased tunnel junction, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 106801 (2020)

2020
[68]

Tesser, M

L. Tesser, M. Acciai, C. Sp ˚ ansl¨ att, J. Monsel, and J. Splettstoesser, Charge, spin, and heat shot noises in the absence of average currents: Conditions on bounds at zero and finite frequencies, Phys. Rev. B 107, 075409 (2023)

2023
[69]

Pierattelli, F

L. Pierattelli, F. Taddei, and A. Braggio, ∆ T -noise in multiterminal hybrid systems, arXiv:2411.12572

arXiv
[70]

H¨ ubler, D

M. H¨ ubler, D. M. Basko, and W. Belzig, Scatter- ing approach to near-field radiative heat transfer, arXiv:2411.04048
[71]

P. L. Richards, Bolometers for infrared and millimeter waves, J. Appl. Phys. 76, 1 (1994)

1994

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [7]

Saira, M

O.-P. Saira, M. Meschke, F. Giazotto, A. M. Savin, M. M¨ ott¨ onen, and J. P. Pekola, Heat transistor: Demon- stration of gate-controlled electronic refrigeration, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 027203 (2007). 13

work page 2007

[2] [1]

Fornieri and F

A. Fornieri and F. Giazotto, Towards phase-coherent caloritronics in superconducting circuits, Nat. Nanotech- nol. 12, 944 (2017)

work page 2017

[3] [2]

X. Siqi, Z. Hongxin, Z. Xing, and W. Haidong, A brief review on the recent development of phonon engineering and manipulation at nanoscales, Int. J. Extreme Manuf. 6, 012007 (2023)

work page 2023

[4] [3]

Ibabe, G

´A. Ibabe, G. O. Steffensen, I. Casal, M. G´ omez, T. Kanne, J. Nyg ˚ ard, A. Levy Yeyati, and E. J. H. Lee, Heat dissipation mechanisms in hybrid superconductor– semiconductor devices revealed by joule spectroscopy, Nano Lett. 24, 6488 (2024)

work page 2024

[5] [5]

Swoboda, K

T. Swoboda, K. Klinar, A. S. Yalamarthy, A. Kitanovski, and M. M. Rojo, Solid-state thermal control devices, Adv. Electron. Mater. 7, 2000625 (2021)

work page 2021

[6] [6]

Castelli, Q

L. Castelli, Q. Zhu, T. J. Shimokusu, and G. Wehmeyer, A three-terminal magnetic thermal transistor, Nat. Com- mun. 14, 393 (2023)

2023

[7] [8]

Krinner, S

S. Krinner, S. Storz, P. Kurpiers, P. Magnard, J. Hein- soo, R. Keller, J. L¨ utolf, C. Eichler, and A. Wallraff, Engineering cryogenic setups for 100-qubit scale super- conducting circuit systems, EPJ Quantum Technol. 6, 2 (2019)

work page 2019

[8] [9]

Somoroff, Q

A. Somoroff, Q. Ficheux, R. A. Mencia, H. Xiong, R. Kuzmin, and V. E. Manucharyan, Millisecond coher- ence in a superconducting qubit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 267001 (2023)

2023