Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 3 cited by

A New Spectral Library for Modeling the Surfaces of Hot, Rocky Exoplanets

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Texture can alter a rocky exoplanet's albedo sevenfold, so a single broadband brightness measurement cannot identify what its surface is made of; mid-infrared spectral features can, at the cost of roughly five to twenty stacked JWST…

desk verdict A genuinely useful lab-data paper with a robust albedo-degeneracy result; treat the JWST eclipse-count forecasts as optimistic because the reflectance-to-emissivity conversion is not independently validated. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.04433 v1 pith:K42XGHCO submitted 2025-02-06 astro-ph.EP

Kimberly Paragas , Heather A. Knutson , Renyu Hu , Bethany L. Ehlmann , Giulia Alemanno , Jörn Helbert , Alessandro Maturilli , Michael Zhang
show 2 more authors
Aishwarya Iyer George Rossman
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.EP
keywords rockyexoplanetsurfacesspectrallibrarythermalemissionspectroscopyJWSTMIRILRSalbedosurfacetextureChristiansenfeatureLHS3844b
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Surfaces of hot, airless rocky exoplanets are now being observed with JWST for the first time, but the spectral libraries used to model them were built from room-temperature powdered minerals. This paper measures hemispherical reflectance from 0.35 to 25 \mu m for 11 igneous rock types plus hematite, in three textures each (solid slab, coarse crushed grains, and fine powder), and adds direct emissivity measurements at 500 to 800 K for ten of the samples. Using these spectra inside the open-source PLATON retrieval code, it shows that the same rock can look seven times brighter as a powder than as a slab, so albedo does not uniquely map to composition. It argues that four mid-infrared features, the 5.6 \mu m olivine feature, the transparency feature, the Si-O stretch, and the Christiansen feature, are the practical diagnostics of silicate composition and surface texture, and it estimates how many JWST eclipses are needed to detect them on the benchmark target LHS 3844 b. It closes by showing that one Spitzer 4.5 \mu m brightness point is consistent with many rock types and textures, so broadband dayside measurements cannot by themselves tell us what a hot rocky exoplanet is made of.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the new laboratory spectral library: hemispherical reflectance spectra (0.35 to 25 \mu m, room temperature) of 11 igneous rocks spanning roughly 39 to 73 wt\% SiO$_2$ plus hematite, each prepared as a solid slab, crushed grains (500 \mu m to 1 mm), and fine powder (25 to 63 \mu m), together with direct emissivity measurements of ten samples at 500 to 800 K. The argument runs through the Hapke (2012) conversion from hemispherical reflectance $r_h$ to single-scattering albedo $\omega$ and hemispheric emissivity $\varepsilon_h$, with directional emissivity taken as $\varepsilon_d = 1 - r_h$ in the LHS 3844 b energy-balance model (Eq. 7), which fixes each surface's dayside temperature and predicted eclipse-depth spectrum. A redistribution factor $f$, calibrated against the 2D models of Hu et al. (2012), maps the 1D temperature model onto the flux seen at eclipse. The four diagnostic features, the 5.6 \mu m olivine overtone-combination band, the transparency feature (enhanced multiple scattering of fine grains), the Si-O asymmetric stretch fundamental (8 to 12 \mu m), and the Christiansen feature (emissivity maximum where the refractive index of the material matches the vacuum), are the identities used to separate composition and texture. Detection tests simulate JWST MIRI LRS noise with Pandexo and use nested-sampling Bayes factors on 1000 noise realizations to set the required eclipse counts.

What would settle it

Compare feature depths in direct high-temperature (800 to 1000 K) directional emissivity measurements, taken with a shielded cavity so no sample-cup emission contaminates the spectrum and with propagated uncertainties, against the $\varepsilon_d = 1 - r_h$ prediction from the same samples' room-temperature hemispherical reflectance. If the measured-to-predicted depth ratio differs from the fitted scale factor $s$ by more than the measurement uncertainty, the paper's predicted eclipse-count thresholds shift accordingly; a stacked 5 to 7 eclipse MIRI LRS spectrum of LHS 3844 b that fails to show the expected Si-O or olivine feature would likewise falsify the detection predictions.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that for hot, bare-rock exoplanets observed in thermal emission, albedo alone is a weak and degenerate indicator of surface composition, while spectrally resolved mid-infrared features are the reliable diagnostics. The paper demonstrates this by measuring hemispherical reflectance for 11 igneous rock types in up to three textures and showing that texture changes albedo by up to a factor of seven within a single sample, shifts predicted dayside temperatures by up to 70 K, and can mimic or mask compositional differences. It then shows that the 5.6 \mu m olivine feature, the transparency feature (a steep slope between roughly 4 and 7 \mu m caused by multiple scattering in fine grains), the Si-O stretching feature (8 to 12 \mu m), and the location of the Christiansen feature (7 to 9 \mu m emissivity maximum that tracks SiO$_2$ content) are the features that carry composition and texture information obtainable with JWST MIRI LRS, and it quantifies the observing cost: roughly 5 eclipses to detect a deep Si-O feature (dalmatian granite slab), 7 for the olivine feature (dunite xenolith powder), and 20 for the transparency feature with MIRI LRS alone, improving to 2 NIRSpec G395H plus 3 MIRI LRS eclipses. Applied to LHS 3844 b, the new library shows that one Spitzer 4.5 \mu m measurement admits 18 of the 31 surface-texture combinations, ruling out fine powders but not distinguishing among granite, basalt, and other mafic and ultramafic slabs and crushed rocks. The paper concludes that the absolute depths of emission features predicted from room-temperature reflectance are systematically too large, its own 500 to 800 K emissivity measurements are shallower, so feature presence, shape, and location, rather than albedo or absolute contrast, are the robust observables.

Load-bearing premise

The whole predictive chain rests on the assumption that a room-temperature hemispherical reflectance measurement, converted to emissivity through $\varepsilon_d = 1 - r_h$, reproduces the spectral contrast a JWST would see from a hot planetary surface, but the paper's own 500 to 800 K emission measurements show features coming out systematically shallower, and that offset is absorbed by a fitted scale factor rather than derived from physics.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Single-band dayside photometry (for example, one Spitzer or JWST broadband point) cannot uniquely determine the surface composition of a hot bare-rock exoplanet; multi-wavelength mid-infrared spectroscopy is required to break the albedo-texture-composition degeneracy.
  • For the most favorable target, LHS 3844 b, a stacked spectrum of about five MIRI LRS eclipses can detect a deep Si-O stretching feature if the surface is coarse-grained, about seven eclipses can detect the olivine feature for an olivine-rich surface, and about twenty MIRI eclipses (or two NIRSpec G395H plus three MIRI) are needed for the transparency feature.
  • Existing room-temperature reflectance libraries are adequate for predicting where features appear and whether they should be detectable, but they overstate feature contrast; measured high-temperature emissivities are systematically shallower, so amplitude-based claims should carry the scale-factor caveat.
  • On LHS 3844 b, the Spitzer 4.5 \mu m measurement is consistent with most slab and crushed silicate surfaces and with hematite, and inconsistent with fine silicate powders; the earlier conclusion that basaltic surfaces are preferred and feldspathic or granitoid surfaces are excluded no longer holds.
  • Temperature-dependent spectral changes (Christiansen feature shifts and Si-O depth changes) are expected to be below the noise floor of current JWST observations of hot rocky planets, so temperature effects do not need to be modeled explicitly for feature detection.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The fitted scale factor $s$ in the emissivity calibration (Eq. 1) is, in effect, an admission that reflectance-derived feature depths are too large; an independent high-temperature emissivity campaign with strict cavity control could turn this correction into a physical model and revise the quoted eclipse counts.
  • Because the transparency feature is a grain-size diagnostic, its detectability with combined NIRSpec and MIRI observations suggests a path toward constraining whether exoplanet surfaces are regolith-covered or bedrock, an observable tied to surface age and resurfacing history, not just composition.
  • The quasi-linear Christiansen-feature-versus-SiO$_2$ relation, with its texture-dependent offset, could be exploited at lower spectral resolution; a few carefully placed photometric channels (as done for the Moon and Mercury) might classify exoplanet lithologies without full LRS spectra.
  • The albedo variability within a single compositional class implies that Bond-albedo-based inferences about a planet's volatile history or interior are fragile; surface texture is a confounder that planetary geology models will need to treat as a free parameter.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper presents a new laboratory spectral library of 11 igneous rock samples (ultramafic through felsic, plus hematite) measured in three textures (solid slab, crushed, powder), together with high-temperature (500-800 K) emissivity measurements for a subset of samples. The library is incorporated into PLATON v6.3, and the authors use it to model bare-rock dayside emission spectra of hot rocky exoplanets. The central claims are that (i) albedo is a degenerate and unreliable proxy for surface composition because both composition and texture strongly affect reflectance; (ii) four mid-infrared features (5.6 μm olivine, transparency feature, Si-O stretching, Christiansen feature) are useful diagnostics of silicate abundance and texture; (iii) JWST MIRI LRS detectability of these features on LHS 3844 b requires approximately 7, 20, and 5 eclipse observations respectively; and (iv) published Spitzer 4.5 μm photometry of LHS 3844 b is consistent with a wide range of slab/crushed silicate compositions, contrary to the earlier basaltic-only interpretation. The paper also concludes that temperature-dependent spectral changes are likely too small to detect with current precision.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the paper provides a timely and useful community resource: a broader, well-characterized set of laboratory reflectance and emissivity measurements than the widely used Hu et al. (2012) library, integrated into an open-source retrieval package. The sample characterization (chemical analyses, XRD mineralogy, TAS classification, screening for aqueous alteration) is thorough, and the direct comparison of slab/crushed/powder textures is a genuine addition, as is the high-temperature emissivity dataset. The qualitative conclusion that single-band albedo measurements cannot uniquely identify surface composition is convincingly demonstrated and is robust to the calibration concerns discussed below. The quantitative JWST feasibility forecasts (eclipse counts and Christiansen-feature wavelength constraints) are the most directly actionable claims for observers, and those are precisely the claims most sensitive to the assumed reflectance-to-emissivity conversion.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4.2, §4.3; Eqs. (1), (8)]
  2. [§2.4, Eq. (1), Figure 5]
  3. [§4.2.2–§4.2.4]
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 1]
  2. [Section 2.2.1 / Introduction]
  3. [Figure 5 caption and §4.3]
  4. [§4.3]

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the core claims rest on new laboratory reflectance and emissivity measurements, and the JWST detectability forecasts are explicit conditional sensitivity tests.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are grounded in new, externally measured laboratory data rather than in the model outputs. The albedo degeneracy and texture dependence follow directly from measured hemispherical reflectances for 11 rock types in three textures; these are new data, not quantities defined in terms of the conclusions. The identification of the 5.6 micron olivine feature, transparency feature, Si-O stretching feature, and Christiansen feature is empirical, supported by the measured spectra and compositional analysis, and is framed as a library characterization rather than a derivation from first principles. The JWST eclipse-count forecasts (5, 7, and 20 eclipses for the Si-O, olivine, and transparency features) are conditional signal-injection/recovery tests: the authors simulate Pandexo observations with their modeled spectra as inputs and then test whether a feature-amplitude parameter is recoverable against a feature-removed or blackbody null hypothesis. This is a standard sensitivity forecast and does not claim that the features have been detected on LHS 3844 b. The thresholds depend on the assumed reflectance-to-emissivity conversion, but that is a model assumption, not a circular reduction: epsilon_d = 1 - r_h is Kirchhoff's law applied to the measured reflectance, and the paper explicitly acknowledges in Section 4.3 that directly measured high-temperature emission features are systematically shallower than reflectance-derived emissivities, listing this as a caveat for feature detectability rather than as a validation of the conversion. The scale factor s in Equation 1 is used only for determining the blackbody temperature in the high-temperature emissivity calibration; the calibrated emissivity is computed as the measured intensity divided by the reference blackbody intensity, so the shallower feature depths seen in Figure 5 are data-driven rather than forced by s. The high-temperature measurements themselves are presented with explicit caveats about cup contamination and the lack of an independent empty-cup calibration, which affects model uncertainty but does not constitute circular reasoning. There are self-citations (Hu et al. 2012 for the earlier spectral library and modeling approach; Zhang et al. 2019, 2020, 2024 for PLATON), but the central claims do not reduce to these citations. The new library is measured independently, the energy-balance model is standard, and the f-factor calibration against Hu et al.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central model inputs are 11 lab-measured rock samples; the main fitted quantities are the emissivity calibration scale factor s, the redistribution factor f, and the per-spectrum temperature T_best. The main axioms are the Hapke/Kirchhoff conversion from reflectance to emissivity, the 1D uniform-temperature approximation with an f calibrated to prior 2D models, the assumption that modestly weathered igneous rocks represent exoplanet surfaces, and the fidelity of the Pandexo noise model. No invented entities are introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • Scale factor s in emissivity calibration = not tabulated; each sample/temperature step fitted in range 0 to 1
    Introduced in Eq 1 to match measured high-temperature intensity to I_ref[1 - s*r_h]. It controls the depth of features in the calibrated emissivity and is central to the Section 4.3 claim that emission features are shallower than reflectance-derived features.
  • Redistribution factor f = linear coefficients m=-0.137, b=0.620; f values in Table 4 for Hu et al. (2012) surfaces
    Fitted so the 1D uniform-temperature model matches the 2D Hu et al. (2012) models; new samples receive f from a linear fit to median hemispherical reflectance, and this f sets predicted dayside surface temperatures in Eq 7.
  • Best-fit sample temperature T_best for each emissivity spectrum = reported in Figure 5 legends, e.g., 497 K, 603 K, 697 K, 795 K, 825 K
    T_best is optimized in Eq 1 for the 500 K step and then matched between steps; the calibrated emissivity slopes and feature depths depend on these fitted temperatures and their uncertainty is not propagated.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Hapke model assumptions: particles scatter isotropically, opposition effect negligible, roughness negligible, porosity parameter set to unity
    Used in Section 3 (after Eq 3) to convert hemispherical reflectance to single-scattering albedo and hemispheric emissivity for the dayside energy balance; if violated, predicted temperatures and eclipse depths change.
  • domain assumption Kirchhoff's law applies: directional emissivity equals 1 minus hemispherical reflectance (ε_d = 1 - r_h)
    Used in Eq 7-8 to build dayside emission models from room-temperature reflectance; Section 4.3 notes high-temperature measurements violate the thermal-equilibrium condition and show shallower features.
  • domain assumption A single uniform dayside temperature with a redistribution factor f reproduces the 2D dayside temperature gradient models
    Section 3 and Appendix B calibrate f against Hu et al. (2012) 2D models and fit it linearly to median reflectance; predicted secondary eclipse depths depend on this approximation.
  • domain assumption Laboratory igneous rock samples with minimal aqueous alteration are representative proxies for hot, airless exoplanet surfaces
    Sample selection in Section 2.1 excludes altered materials and metal-rich compositions; the library is assumed to span plausible exoplanet surface lithologies and textures.
  • domain assumption Pandexo noise simulations and dynesty nested sampling faithfully represent JWST MIRI LRS/NIRSpec performance for eclipse observations
    Eclipse-count detection thresholds in Sections 4.2.2-4.2.5 rely on simulated noise realizations, not real JWST data.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A New Spectral Library for Modeling the Surfaces of Hot, Rocky Exoplanets." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/K42XGHCO

@misc{pith2026250204433,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A New Spectral Library for Modeling the Surfaces of Hot, Rocky Exoplanets},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/K42XGHCO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.04433}
}
read the original abstract

JWST's MIRI LRS provides the first opportunity to spectroscopically characterize the surface compositions of close-in terrestrial exoplanets. Models for the bare-rock spectra of these planets often utilize a spectral library from R. Hu et al., which is based on room temperature reflectance measurements of materials that represent archetypes of rocky planet surfaces. Here we present an expanded library that includes hemispherical reflectance measurements for a greater variety of compositions, varying textures (solid slab, coarsely crushed, and fine powder), as well as high temperature (500-800 K) emissivity measurements for select samples. We incorporate this new library into version 6.3 of the retrieval package PLATON and use it to show that surfaces with similar compositions can have widely varying albedos and surface temperatures. We additionally demonstrate that changing the texture of a material can significantly alter its albedo, making albedo a poor proxy for surface composition. We identify key spectral features -- the 5.6 \textmu{m} olivine feature, the transparency feature, the Si-O stretching feature, and the Christiansen feature -- that indicate silicate abundance and surface texture. We quantify the number of JWST observations needed to detect these features in the spectrum of the most favorable super-Earth target, LHS 3844 b, and revisit the interpretation of its Spitzer photometry. Lastly, we show that temperature-dependent changes in spectral features are likely undetectable at the precision of current exoplanet observations. Our results illustrate the importance of spectroscopically-resolved thermal emission measurements, as distinct from surface albedo constraints, for characterizing the surface compositions of hot, rocky exoplanets.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.04433 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Representative images of of the sample types used in this study. We show images of the slabs (solid samples) where available. These slabs were cut to a diameter of approximately 45 mm and a thickness of approximately 3 mm as described in §2.1. For very porous and/or smaller sample pieces (K1919 basalt, basaltic andesite), we assembled individual fragments to cover an equivalently sized area. For samples without soli… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Total Alkali Silica (TAS) diagram of all igneous samples in this study. The labels Pc, Bs, Ba, BA, A, D, T, and R correspond to picrite basalt, basalt, trachybasalt, basaltic andesite, andesite, dacite, trachyte, and rhyolite, respectively. Though this compositional space is intended for igneous rocks, we include the dunite xenolith sample in order to provide visual comparison of its chemical abundances relative to … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Final calibrated hemispherical reflectance measurements. The name of each sample is given in the top right corner of each panel, with the color of the curves in each panel corresponding to the texture of the sample. Whenever available, we obtained measurements for three textures: slab (dark blue), crushed (green; 500 µm to 1 mm grains), and powder (gold; 25 µm to 63 µm grains). We also show hemispherical reflectance… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (12 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Photos of the orlando gold granite slab sample taken with the webcam mounted in the emissivity chamber. The picture on the left was taken at room temperature with the light inside the chamber turned on. The picture on the right was taken at ∼684 K with the light turned…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: High temperature emissivity measurements of heated samples with their pre-heating directional emissivities (solid gray line) calculated from our room temperature hemispherical reflectance measurements from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The secondary eclipse depths, or planet-to-star flux ratio, for an LHS 3844 b analog with a bare-rock surface composed of orlando gold granite powder, the most reflective surface and texture combination in our library. These models were generated assuming a blackbody s…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: ) result in a correspondingly wide range in pre￾dicted dayside temperatures over the wavelength range included in the figures (0.5 µm to 20 µm) . We demon￾strate this by calculating predicted emission spectra for a planet with the same properties as LHS 3844 b (Van￾der…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The hemispherical reflectance measurements for the slab, crushed, and powder textures for the dalmatian granite sample. We labeled the transparency feature and the Si-O stretching feature in black. The lighter portions of the lines indicate regions which correspond to …
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The location of the Christiansen Feature as a function of the SiO2 wt% for the silicate samples in our spectral library. The textures (slab, crushed, and powder) of each sample are denoted by the marker shapes (square, circle, and triangle; respectively). We also inclu…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Measured Christiansen Feature location as a function of temperature for the dunite xenolith powder (top) and the orlando gold granite powder (bottom). Note the different horizontal axis ranges. the host star, which provides a good match to the stellar spectrum measure…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Predicted wavelength-dependent secondary eclipse depths for a LHS 3844 b analog assuming a blackbody for the stellar spectrum. We show two models spanning the range from lowest (dunite xenolith) to the second highest (dalmatian granite) SiO2 wt%. We modeled the dalmat…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Predicted wavelength-dependent secondary eclipse depths for the super-Earth LHS 3844 b generated using the powdered samples from Hu et al. (2012) and an updated stellar spectrum. As discussed in §2.1, we only show the subset of surfaces relevant for hot, rocky exoplan…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Thermal emission spectra of 18/31 surface and texture combinations in our spectral library that are ≤ 2σ consistent with the 4.5 µm Spitzer measurement (the marker in black) for LHS 3844 b in Kreidberg et al. (2019). These models are generated for the LHS 3844 b syste…
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: The best-fit f values for the surfaces in Hu et al. (2012) as a function of median hemispherical reflectance taken over a wavelength range corresponding to 85% of the integrated flux of a 3000 K host star. The best-fit linear function used to estimate the f values for…
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: The 1D models described in this work compared to the 2D models of the surfaces in Hu et al. (2012) for LHS 3844 b system parameters. We show our 1D models for the best-fit redistribution factor and f=2/3, the typical value used in the literature. For full comparison, …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. First JWST thermal phase curves of temperate terrestrial exoplanets reveal no thick atmosphere around TRAPPIST-1 b and c

    astro-ph.EP 2025-09 accept novelty 8.0 of 10

    First JWST phase curves of TRAPPIST-1 b and c rule out thick, heat-redistributing atmospheres; b is likely airless, c may retain a tenuous O2 atmosphere.

  2. Silicate mineralogy and bulk composition of exoplanetary material in polluted white dwarfs

    astro-ph.EP 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    New ultraviolet abundances for two white dwarfs, combined with a re-analysis of eight systems, support a tentative correlation between the Mg/Si ratio of accreted exoplanetary material and whether its dust is olivine-...

  3. A first look at rocky exoplanets with JWST

    astro-ph.EP 2025-07 accept novelty 3.0 of 10

    This review of JWST rocky exoplanet observations finds no confirmed atmospheres and sets a five scale height precision target for future transmission spectroscopy.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

77 extracted references · 20 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month number organization pages publisher school series title misctitle type volume year version url label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts ...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.url url empty "" new.block "" url * "" * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix "arXiv" = new.block " " eprint * " " * new.block " " eprint * " " * if if if FUNCTION format.doi doi empty "" " " doi * " " * if FUNCTION format.pid doi empty eprint empty ur...

  3. [3]

    Se w3l T1V|2K ۬^lf| 7 e0 L3x?f5yp |1hĈJf-l þ4nޢ 4A lja 6n[GCL Fq 6* c1 6<s4l ¶#fnIfHCjݝ 3y]9n'38`^ Ef # R կ)!l zj> 7ތw lj6Ù|>XlK a Gk2Z˽!Ɂ ? oA/ ۘ|; mWa oo[gGG e6 gl h(<¡؛MOvmsKbˏ

    thebibliography [1] 20pt to REFERENCES 6pt =0pt -12pt 10pt plus 3pt =0pt =0pt =1pt plus 1pt =0pt =0pt -12pt =13pt plus 1pt =20pt =13pt plus 1pt \@M =10000 =-1.0em =0pt =0pt 0pt =0pt =1.0em @enumiv\@empty 10000 10000 `\.\@m \@noitemerr \@latex@warning Empty `thebibliography' environment \@ifnextchar \@reference \@latexerr Missing key on reference command E...

    2021

  4. [4]

    E., Ehlmann , B

    Anderson , D. E., Ehlmann , B. L., Forni , O., et al. 2017, Journal of Geophysical Research (Planets), 122, 744, 10.1002/2016JE005164

    work page doi:10.1002/2016je005164 2017

  5. [5]

    E., Mandell , A., Pontoppidan , K., et al

    Batalha , N. E., Mandell , A., Pontoppidan , K., et al. 2017, , 129, 064501, 10.1088/1538-3873/aa65b0

    doi:10.1088/1538-3873/aa65b0 2017

  6. [6]

    E., & Hofmeister , A

    Bowey , J. E., & Hofmeister , A. M. 2005, , 358, 1383, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08848.x

    arXiv 2005

  7. [7]

    L., Polanski , A

    Brinkman , C. L., Polanski , A. S., Huber , D., et al. 2024 a , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2409.08361, 10.48550/arXiv.2409.08361

    arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2409.08361 2024

  8. [8]

    L., Weiss , L

    Brinkman , C. L., Weiss , L. M., Huber , D., et al. 2024 b , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2410.00213, 10.48550/arXiv.2410.00213

    arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.00213 2024

Show all 77 references
  1. [9]

    L., & Zuber , M

    Charlier , B., Grove , T. L., & Zuber , M. T. 2013, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 363, 50, 10.1016/j.epsl.2012.12.021

    2013 doi

  2. [10]

    R., Bandfield , J

    Christensen , P. R., Bandfield , J. L., Hamilton , V. E., et al. 2001, , 106, 23823, 10.1029/2000JE001370

    2001 doi

  3. [11]

    Clark, R. N. 1999, Spectroscopy of Rocks and Minerals and Principles of Spectroscopy (Wiley), 3–58

    1999

  4. [12]

    Conel , J. E. 1969, , 74, 1614, 10.1029/JB074i006p01614

    1969 doi

  5. [13]

    L., Salisbury , J

    Cooper , B. L., Salisbury , J. W., Killen , R. M., & Potter , A. E. 2002, Journal of Geophysical Research (Planets), 107, 5017, 10.1029/2000JE001462

    2002 doi

  6. [14]

    Crossfield , I. J. M., Malik , M., Hill , M. L., et al. 2022, , 937, L17, 10.3847/2041-8213/ac886b

    2022 doi

  7. [15]

    N., & Zeng , L

    Dai , F., Masuda , K., Winn , J. N., & Zeng , L. 2019, , 883, 79, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab3a3b

    2019 doi

  8. [16]

    L., Chapman , C

    Domingue , D. L., Chapman , C. R., Killen , R. M., et al. 2014, , 181, 121, 10.1007/s11214-014-0039-5

    2014 doi

  9. [17]

    L., Greenhagen , B

    Donaldson Hanna , K. L., Greenhagen , B. T., Patterson , W. R., et al. 2017, , 283, 326, 10.1016/j.icarus.2016.05.034

    2017 doi

  10. [18]

    L., & Edwards, C

    Ehlmann, B. L., & Edwards, C. S. 2014, Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 42, 291, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-earth-060313-055024

    2014 doi

  11. [19]

    T., Hess , P

    Elkins-Tanton , L. T., Hess , P. C., & Parmentier , E. M. 2005, Journal of Geophysical Research (Planets), 110, E12S01, 10.1029/2005JE002480

    2005 doi

  12. [20]

    2020, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 534, 116089, 10.1016/j.epsl.2020.116089

    Ferrari , S., Maturilli , A., Carli , C., et al. 2020, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 534, 116089, 10.1016/j.epsl.2020.116089

    2020

  13. [21]

    C., Mishra , I., Gazel , E., et al

    First , E. C., Mishra , I., Gazel , E., et al. 2024, Nature Astronomy, 10.1038/s41550-024-02412-7

    2024 doi

  14. [22]

    B., et al

    Fortin , M.-A., Gazel , E., Williams , D. B., et al. 2024, , 974, L7, 10.3847/2041-8213/ad7d89

    2024 doi

  15. [23]

    2022, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 577, 117255, 10.1016/j.epsl.2021.117255

    Gaillard , F., Bernadou , F., Roskosz , M., et al. 2022, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 577, 117255, 10.1016/j.epsl.2021.117255

    2022

  16. [24]

    D., Lucey , P

    Glotch , T. D., Lucey , P. G., Bandfield , J. L., et al. 2010, Science, 329, 1510, 10.1126/science.1192148

    2010 doi

  17. [25]

    P., Bell , T

    Greene , T. P., Bell , T. J., Ducrot , E., et al. 2023, , 618, 39, 10.1038/s41586-023-05951-7

    2023 doi

  18. [26]

    H., et al

    Gressier , A., Espinoza , N., Allen , N. H., et al. 2024, , 975, L10, 10.3847/2041-8213/ad73d1

    2024 doi

  19. [27]

    M., Lichtenberg , T., et al

    Hammond , M., Guimond , C. M., Lichtenberg , T., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2409.04386, 10.48550/arXiv.2409.04386

    2024 doi arXiv

  20. [28]

    Hansen , B. M. S. 2008, , 179, 484, 10.1086/591964

    2008 doi

  21. [29]

    2001, , 106, 10039, 10.1029/2000JE001338

    Hapke , B. 2001, , 106, 10039, 10.1029/2000JE001338

    2001 doi

  22. [30]

    2012, Theory of Reflectance and Emittance Spectroscopy (Cambridge University Press), 10.1017/CBO9781139025683

    ---. 2012, Theory of Reflectance and Emittance Spectroscopy (Cambridge University Press), 10.1017/CBO9781139025683

    2012 doi

  23. [31]

    2013, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 371, 252, 10.1016/j.epsl.2013.03.038

    Helbert , J., Nestola , F., Ferrari , S., et al. 2013, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 371, 252, 10.1016/j.epsl.2013.03.038

    2013 doi

  24. [32]

    2020, , 216, 110, 10.1007/s11214-020-00732-4

    Hiesinger , H., Helbert , J., Alemanno , G., et al. 2020, , 216, 110, 10.1007/s11214-020-00732-4

    2020 doi

  25. [33]

    L., & Seager , S

    Hu , R., Ehlmann , B. L., & Seager , S. 2012, , 752, 7, 10.1088/0004-637X/752/1/7

    2012 doi

  26. [34]

    2024, , 630, 609, 10.1038/s41586-024-07432-x

    Hu , R., Bello-Arufe , A., Zhang , M., et al. 2024, , 630, 609, 10.1038/s41586-024-07432-x

    2024 doi

  27. [35]

    2002, Bull Volcanol, 64, 229, 10.1007/s00445-001-0196-8

    Kauahikaua , J., Cashman , K., Clague , D., Champion , D., & Hagstrum , J. 2002, Bull Volcanol, 64, 229, 10.1007/s00445-001-0196-8

    2002 doi

  28. [36]

    Kreidberg , L., Koll , D. D. B., Morley , C., et al. 2019, , 573, 87, 10.1038/s41586-019-1497-4

    2019 doi

  29. [37]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2405.04057, 10.48550/arXiv.2405.04057

    Lichtenberg , T., & Miguel , Y. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2405.04057, 10.48550/arXiv.2405.04057

    2024 doi arXiv

  30. [38]

    2023, , 955, L22, 10.3847/2041-8213/acf7c4

    Lim , O., Benneke , B., Doyon , R., et al. 2023, , 955, L22, 10.3847/2041-8213/acf7c4

    2023 doi

  31. [39]

    M., Hunt , G

    Logan , L. M., Hunt , G. R., Salisbury , J. W., & Balsamo , S. R. 1973, , 78, 4983, 10.1029/JB078i023p04983

    1973 doi

  32. [40]

    2022, Science, 377, 1211, 10.1126/science.abl7164

    Luque , R., & Pall \'e , E. 2022, Science, 377, 1211, 10.1126/science.abl7164

    2022 doi

  33. [41]

    M., et al

    Lustig-Yaeger , J., Fu , G., May , E. M., et al. 2023, Nature Astronomy, 7, 1317, 10.1038/s41550-023-02064-z

    2023 doi

  34. [42]

    S., Hu , R., et al

    Mansfield , M., Kite , E. S., Hu , R., et al. 2019, , 886, 141, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab4c90

    2019 doi

  35. [43]

    2014, Journal of Applied Remote Sensing, 8, 084985, 10.1117/1.JRS.8.084985

    Maturilli , A., & Helbert , J. 2014, Journal of Applied Remote Sensing, 8, 084985, 10.1117/1.JRS.8.084985

    2014 doi

  36. [44]

    2019, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol

    Maturilli , A., Helbert , J., & Arnold , G. 2019, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 11128, Infrared Remote Sensing and Instrumentation XXVII, ed. M. Strojnik & G. E. Arnold , 111280T, 10.1117/12.2529266

    2019 doi

  37. [45]

    2006, , 54, 1057, 10.1016/j.pss.2005.12.021

    Maturilli , A., Helbert , J., Witzke , A., & Moroz , L. 2006, , 54, 1057, 10.1016/j.pss.2005.12.021

    2006 doi

  38. [46]

    M., MacDonald , R

    May , E. M., MacDonald , R. J., Bennett , K. A., et al. 2023, , 959, L9, 10.3847/2041-8213/ad054f

    2023 doi

  39. [47]

    E., Hiroi , T., Scholes , D., Slavney , S., & Arvidson , R

    Milliken , R. E., Hiroi , T., Scholes , D., Slavney , S., & Arvidson , R. 2021, in LPI Contributions, Vol. 2654, Astromaterials Data Management in the Era of Sample-Return Missions Community Workshop, 2021

    2021

  40. [48]

    E., Stevenson , K

    Moran , S. E., Stevenson , K. B., Sing , D. K., et al. 2023, , 948, L11, 10.3847/2041-8213/accb9c

    2023 doi

  41. [49]

    F., & Hays , J

    Mustard , J. F., & Hays , J. E. 1997, , 125, 145, 10.1006/icar.1996.5583

    1997

  42. [50]

    R., & Rogers , L

    Neil , A. R., & Rogers , L. A. 2020, , 891, 12, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab6a92

    2020 doi

  43. [51]

    A., Foote , M

    Paige , D. A., Foote , M. C., Greenhagen , B. T., et al. 2010, , 150, 125, 10.1007/s11214-009-9529-2

    2010 doi

  44. [52]

    Rogers , L. A. 2015, , 801, 41, 10.1088/0004-637X/801/1/41

    2015 doi

  45. [53]

    R., & Ehlmann, B

    Rossman, G. R., & Ehlmann, B. L. 2019, Electronic Spectra of Minerals in the Visible and Near-Infrared Regions, Cambridge Planetary Science (Cambridge University Press), 3–20

    2019

  46. [54]

    W., Christensen , P

    Ruff , S. W., Christensen , P. R., Barbera , P. W., & Anderson , D. L. 1997, , 102, 14899, 10.1029/97JB00593

    1997 doi

  47. [55]

    Salisbury, J. W. 1993, Mid-Infrared Spectroscopy: Laboratory Data, Cambridge Planetary Science (Cambridge University Press)

    1993

  48. [56]

    W., D'Aria , D

    Salisbury , J. W., D'Aria , D. M., & Jarosewich , E. 1991, , 92, 280, 10.1016/0019-1035(91)90052-U

    1991 doi

  49. [57]

    W., Wald , A., & D'Aria , D

    Salisbury , J. W., Wald , A., & D'Aria , D. M. 1994, , 99, 11897, 10.1029/93JB03600

    1994 doi

  50. [58]

    W., & Walter , L

    Salisbury , J. W., & Walter , L. S. 1989, , 94, 9192, 10.1029/JB094iB07p09192

    1989 doi

  51. [59]

    2009, , 703, 1884, 10.1088/0004-637X/703/2/1884

    Seager , S., & Deming , D. 2009, , 703, 1884, 10.1088/0004-637X/703/2/1884

    2009 doi

  52. [60]

    Speagle , J. S. 2020, , 493, 3132, 10.1093/mnras/staa278

    2020 doi

  53. [61]

    Thayer, T. P. 1934, PhD thesis, Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology

    1934

  54. [62]

    2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2310.15895, 10.48550/arXiv.2310.15895

    TRAPPIST-1 JWST Community Initiative , de Wit , J., Doyon , R., et al. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2310.15895, 10.48550/arXiv.2310.15895

    2023 doi arXiv

  55. [63]

    X., Vanderburg , A., et al

    Vanderspek , R., Huang , C. X., Vanderburg , A., et al. 2019, , 871, L24, 10.3847/2041-8213/aafb7a

    2019 doi

  56. [64]

    K., Diamond-Lowe , H., et al

    Wachiraphan , P., Berta-Thompson , Z. K., Diamond-Lowe , H., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2410.10987, 10.48550/arXiv.2410.10987

    2024 doi

  57. [65]

    2024, , 975, L22, 10.3847/2041-8213/ad8161

    Weiner Mansfield , M., Xue , Q., Zhang , M., et al. 2024, , 975, L22, 10.3847/2041-8213/ad8161

    2024 doi

  58. [66]

    M., & Marcy , G

    Weiss , L. M., & Marcy , G. W. 2014, , 783, L6, 10.1088/2041-8205/783/1/L6

    2014 doi

  59. [67]

    A., Malik , M., Ih , J., et al

    Whittaker , E. A., Malik , M., Ih , J., et al. 2022, , 164, 258, 10.3847/1538-3881/ac9ab3

    2022 doi

  60. [68]

    2015, , 806, 183, 10.1088/0004-637X/806/2/183

    Wolfgang , A., & Lopez , E. 2015, , 806, 183, 10.1088/0004-637X/806/2/183

    2015 doi

  61. [69]

    2022, , 60, 159, 10.1146/annurev-astro-052920-125632

    Wordsworth , R., & Kreidberg , L. 2022, , 60, 159, 10.1146/annurev-astro-052920-125632

    2022 doi

  62. [70]

    L., Zhang , M., et al

    Xue , Q., Bean , J. L., Zhang , M., et al. 2024, , 973, L8, 10.3847/2041-8213/ad72e9

    2024 doi

  63. [71]

    J., & Catling , D

    Zahnle , K. J., & Catling , D. C. 2017, , 843, 122, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa7846

    2017 doi

  64. [72]

    Zhang , M., Chachan , Y., Kempton , E. M. R., & Knutson , H. A. 2019, , 131, 034501, 10.1088/1538-3873/aaf5ad

    2019 doi

  65. [73]

    Zhang , M., Chachan , Y., Kempton , E. M. R., Knutson , H. A., & Chang , W. H. 2020, , 899, 27, 10.3847/1538-4357/aba1e6

    2020 doi

  66. [74]

    2024, , 961, L44, 10.3847/2041-8213/ad1a07

    Zhang , M., Hu , R., Inglis , J., et al. 2024, , 961, L44, 10.3847/2041-8213/ad1a07

    2024 doi

  67. [75]

    2023, , 391, 115346, 10.1016/j.icarus.2022.115346

    Zhuang , Y., Zhang , H., Ma , P., et al. 2023, , 391, 115346, 10.1016/j.icarus.2022.115346

    2023

  68. [76]

    2022, , 664, A79, 10.1051/0004-6361/202142912

    Zieba , S., Zilinskas , M., Kreidberg , L., et al. 2022, , 664, A79, 10.1051/0004-6361/202142912

    2022 doi

  69. [77]

    2023, , 620, 746, 10.1038/s41586-023-06232-z

    Zieba , S., Kreidberg , L., Ducrot , E., et al. 2023, , 620, 746, 10.1038/s41586-023-06232-z

    2023 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.