Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 99 references

A possible trail of dust from a young, highly-extincted brown dwarf in the outskirts of the Trapezium Cluster

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read JWST reveals a highly obscured brown dwarf candidate at the head of a 1,700-au dark dust trail in the outskirts of the Trapezium Cluster, which the authors argue is likely a physical trail of larger-than-ISM dust grains produced by…

desk verdict A genuinely new candidate brown-dwarf dust trail with honest caveats, but the physical association is unproven and the chance-alignment estimate is weaker than it looks. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.04447 v2 pith:T6WE7HLF submitted 2025-02-06 astro-ph.SR astro-ph.EP

Thomas J. Haworth , Mark J. McCaughrean , Samuel G. Pearson , Richard A. Booth This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.SRastro-ph.EP
keywords browndwarfscircumstellardisksexternalphotoevaporationBondi-Hoyle-LyttletonaccretiondustgraingrowthJWSTNIRCamTrapeziumClusterOrionNebula
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper presents a JWST detection of a faint, heavily obscured brown dwarf candidate (mass about 0.018 solar masses, extinction A_V about 52) sitting at the head of a 1,700-au-long, straight, nearly uniform-width dark lane in the outskirts of the Trapezium Cluster. The authors set out to show that the lane could be a physical dust trail produced by the brown dwarf rather than a chance alignment with a background cloud filament, and that such a trail would be visible despite the heavy extinction. The key claim is that dust in the trail needs only slightly larger maximum grain sizes (micron-sized rather than the standard 0.25 micron) to scatter near-infrared light an order of magnitude more efficiently than the ambient cloud, making the trail a few percent darker. They propose two mechanisms that could create such a trail: a weak FUV-driven wind from the circum-brown dwarf disc fed by the Trapezium O stars, or a Bondi-Hoyle-Lyttleton accretion wake. If the association is confirmed, it would be the first dust trail seen around a substellar object in a high-mass star-forming region, and a direct view of environmental forcing on the smallest stars.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the steep dependence of near-infrared scattering opacity on maximum grain size. Using Draine-Lee silicates with a q=3.5 power-law size distribution, raising the maximum grain size from 0.25 micron to about 1 micron increases the scattering opacity at ~1-2 micron wavelengths by over an order of magnitude, while absorption opacity changes little; this is what allows a dust trail seen through A_V ~ 52 to appear slightly darker than its surroundings. The paper combines this opacity contrast with a simple 1D radiative transfer calculation, and then with two physical generators: external FUV photoevaporation, modelled with the torus-3dpdr code including a dust-entrainment formula from Facchini et al., and a Bondi-Hoyle-Lyttleton wake, using the standard stagnation-radius and mass-per-unit-length scalings. A momentum-conserving snowplough estimate of the trail width completes the argument that the observed width is consistent with a wind at plausible densities.

What would settle it

A direct test is proper-motion astrometry: if the trail is a physical wake, the motion of 270-1954 should be aligned along the trail axis, trailing behind the broadened end; a foreground or background filament would show no such alignment. A second test uses the grain-size hypothesis: the scattering-opacity contrast responsible for the dark trail should vanish in the longest NIRCam filters, so deeper F444W imaging should show no drop across the trail.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery claim is that the point source 270-1954, a candidate brown dwarf of roughly 0.018 solar masses at A_V ~ 52, is probably linked to a 1,700-au dark trail seen in JWST NIRCam images. The trail is about 48-72 au wide, broadens slightly away from the source, shows a ~1-per-cent intensity drop in short-wavelength filters, and fades at longer wavelengths. The authors argue that a physical dust trail can explain the observations if the dust in the trail has a larger maximum grain size than the ambient interstellar medium, about 1 micron versus 0.25 micron, because scattering opacity at NIRCam wavelengths rises by more than an order of magnitude with that change, making the trail darker against the background HII-region and PDR emission. They show with a simple 1D radiative transfer model that such a grain-size enhancement alone, without a gas density enhancement, can reproduce the observed multi-filter contrasts at ambient densities near $10^{5}$ $cm^{-3}$. They then argue that both a weak external photoevaporative wind driven by the Trapezium O stars, entraining micron-sized dust, and a Bondi-Hoyle-Lyttleton wake with only modest density enhancement are plausible explanations.

Load-bearing premise

The trail and the point source are at the same distance and physically connected, rather than being a chance superposition of an unrelated dark cloud filament with a background star; the paper acknowledges this is not proven.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the trail is an externally photoevaporated wind, it extends the reach of Trapezium OB-star radiation to 0.5 pc, showing that even ~1 G0 FUV fields can drive dust-bearing winds from compact discs around substellar objects.
  • If it is a Bondi-Hoyle-Lyttleton wake, it would be the first observed case of ongoing late-stage infall from the ISM onto a low-mass object in a high-mass star-forming region.
  • The required micron-sized dust in the trail implies that dust can be grown or entrained in low-mass, low-luminosity disc winds, with consequences for dust evolution and planet formation in irradiated environments.
  • The trail width constrains the combination of brown-dwarf speed, ambient density (~10^5 cm^-3), and wind or wake geometry, giving a new kinematic probe of the Dark Bay's dense gas.
  • Confirming the association would make 270-1954 the first substellar object with a resolved dust trail on hundred-astronomical-unit scales, opening a new observable class.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If such trails are common around substellar objects, deep NIRCam surveys of other HII regions might uncover dozens, making 'dark trails' a new diagnostic for disc mass loss and ISM accretion onto brown dwarfs.
  • The same grain-size-opacity mechanism could be used to map dust grain size variations across the Dark Bay itself: multi-filter extinction contrast might trace where coagulation has occurred.
  • For the BHL wake scenario, decoupled gas-dust simulations of extended wakes would currently be the main missing test; the paper notes none exist, so a dedicated simulation could discriminate wake versus wind by predicting dust-to-gas ratio and grain size in the trail.
  • A MIRI observation of the trail might break the degeneracy: at 10-20 micron the scattering-opacity contrast disappears, so any residual dark lane would indicate extinction by larger grains, while thermal emission from the wake might be detectable.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper reports JWST NIRCam observations of a faint, highly reddened point source, 270-1954, in the Dark Bay northeast of the Trapezium OB stars, located at the head of a ~1700 au long, relatively straight dark trail that shows a ~1% intensity decrement mostly in short-wavelength filters. The authors fit the source SED with BHAC15 evolutionary models, deriving a mass of 0.018±0.007 Msun and Av~52 for an assumed 1 Myr age and 390 pc distance, and use a simple 1D radiative transfer model to argue that the trail-ambient contrast can be reproduced if the trail contains dust with a larger maximum grain size (micron-sized) than the ambient cloud. They then explore two origin mechanisms: a weak FUV-driven external photoevaporation wind from a compact circum-brown dwarf disc and a Bondi-Hoyle-Lyttleton accretion wake, finding each broadly consistent with simple analytic estimates while explicitly acknowledging that the physical association with the brown dwarf is not proven.

Significance. If the physical association is correct, this would be the first dust trail around a substellar object in a high-mass star-forming region and a useful new probe of external photoevaporation or late accretion at low masses. The paper's strengths are its use of high-quality public JWST data, transparent SED fitting, simple analytic radiative transfer, and unusually explicit caveats about the unproven association. However, the central claim is conditional: the detection significance of the trail is modest, the chance-alignment estimate does not account for the search trial factor, and the later mechanism models reuse the density inferred from the trail contrast. The paper is therefore best read as a plausibility study rather than an established detection.

major comments (4)
  1. [3.1] The chance-alignment estimate (~0.02%) is computed for one pre-selected trail and one randomly placed cluster star, but the trail and the point source were found in the same mosaic and the field contains many dark wisps and striations, as the text itself notes. The relevant false-alarm rate should include the number of independent trail-like features in the 11x7.5 arcmin survey and the surface density of all red sources (including the background galaxies visible through the Dark Bay), neither of which is measured; the '500 trails' parenthetical illustrates the sensitivity to the trial factor but does not quantify it. Since the physical association is the premise for the entire interpretation, this is a load-bearing gap.
  2. [Table 2] The contrast measurements are only ~1% with comparable noise; for example F277W is 0.55±0.71% and F300M is 0.73±0.55%, so even the sign of the decrement is marginal in several filters. The detection rests on the average of 200 aligned cuts in a few short-wavelength filters. A null test comparing the stacked profile against similarly constructed profiles at many random positions and orientations in the same mosaic, or against the distribution of the Dark Bay's background variation, would establish that a straight 1700 au trail with this amplitude is not a chance fluctuation of the variable foreground nebulosity.
  3. [4.3 and 5.3.1/6] The radiative transfer model in Fig. 11 is used to infer an ambient density n~10^5 cm^-3 by matching the observed trail contrast for a chosen maximum grain size (0.6 or 1 micron) in the trail. This same density then enters the wind-width estimate (Eq. 9) and the BHL wake density estimate (Eq. 13), so the subsequent statement that the two mechanisms are 'consistent' is partly a restatement of the input model. The paper should list the fitted versus assumed parameters explicitly and explore the full allowable region (in particular the RV~5.5 case with amax=0.6 microns and n~10^6-10^7 cm^-3 shown in Fig. 14) when assessing whether either mechanism can explain the trail.
  4. [3.2] The inferred physical properties (0.018 Msun, 1700 au trail length) assume that 270-1954 is a member of the ONC at 390 pc with an age near 1 Myr. If the object is instead a background red source seen through the Dark Bay—a possibility the text leaves open when it notes that background galaxies are visible—then the distance, the trail scale, and the mass are not constrained. A membership test using the object's colour-magnitude position relative to the cluster sequence or existing astrometry should be provided before the physical sizes and masses are used in the mechanism models.
minor comments (5)
  1. [1] The introduction contains the typo 'a a narrow' in the sentence describing the trail.
  2. [4 and Eq. (2)] The identifier is twice written as '207-1954' instead of '270-1954' in the paragraph preceding Eq. (2).
  3. [Eq. (9)] The wind velocity in the normalization of Eq. (9) is 0.2 km/s, while the text then adopts v_w=0.5 km/s for the numerical estimate; please make the fiducial values consistent.
  4. [3.1 and 5.3.1] The trail width is described as 4–6 pixels (48–72 au) in Section 3.1 but Section 5.3.1 quotes a radius of 24 au (2 pixels) and 36 au (3 pixels); please clarify whether widths or radii are meant and state the NIRCam PSF size relative to these scales.
  5. [6, Eq. (13)] The mean molecular weight mu in Eq. (13) is not defined or assigned a numerical value.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the radiative-transfer fit is used transparently as input to independent plausibility checks, and the physical association is explicitly acknowledged as unproven.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is explicitly conditional (Section 7: "While we cannot fully prove a physical association between them at this stage, we use simple arguments to demonstrate that such a scenario is possible"), and the modelling chain does not reduce to its own inputs. The SED fit in Section 3.2 yields M = 0.018 Msun and AV = 52 from independent NIRCam photometry and model atmospheres; this extinction is then used in Section 4 only to set the density-length relation via Eq. (2). The radiative-transfer model in Section 4.3 independently fits the free cloud density and trail grain size to the observed multi-filter contrast (Figs. 11 and 14). This is a parameter fit, not a circular prediction: the observable contrast is not an input to the SED fit, and the fitted density is subsequently used in Sections 5.3.1 and 6 only to check other observables (trail width and wake density enhancement) that were not part of the fit. The wind entrainment calculation in Section 5.3 computes a maximum entrainable grain size from mass-loss models and the Facchini et al. (2016) formalism, which is independent of the contrast fit; its agreement with the micron-sized grains needed in Section 4 is a plausibility argument, not a tautology. Self-citations to McCaughrean & Pearson (2023) supply the observational dataset and to Haworth et al. (2023b) supply a code/grid; neither is invoked as an unverified uniqueness theorem, and the new bespoke photoevaporation models are run explicitly for this paper. The paper also clearly flags the unproven physical association as a limitation rather than hiding it. No circular step can therefore be exhibited from the paper's own equations or citations.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumed physical association, the adopted grain size distributions, the distance and age, and the simple 1D geometry. The cloud density and maximum trail grain size are adjusted to reproduce the observed contrast, so they are fitting parameters rather than independent measurements. The mechanism models add further assumptions about disc radii, surface density, and velocity.

free parameters (7)
  • Brown dwarf mass = 0.018 M_sun ± 0.007
    Derived from SED fitting with BHAC15 models assuming 1 Myr age and 390 pc distance. Uncertainty dominated by age uncertainty.
  • Visual extinction toward 270-1954 = AV = 52(+9,-2) mag
    Derived from SED fitting; upper bound from RV=3.1 law, lower from curve_fit covariance.
  • Ambient cloud density n_a = ~1e5 cm^-3
    Chosen in the 1D radiative transfer model to reproduce the observed trail/ambient contrast across NIRCam filters; independent arguments (Jeans length, required path length) favor high density but do not pin it down.
  • Maximum trail grain size = ~1 micron (0.6-1 micron compatible)
    Explored values of 0.6, 1, and 10 micron; the smaller two reproduce the contrast, 10 micron does not. This is the key physical ingredient that makes the trail visible.
  • Ambient maximum grain size = 0.25 micron (q=3.5)
    Standard ISM power-law from Mathis et al. (1977); alternative RV=5.5 scenarios with larger ambient grains require higher densities (1e6-1e7 cm^-3).
  • Disc radius = 5-20 au
    Bespoke external photoevaporation models assume compact discs; these were chosen because the required entrainment works and the depletion timescale is plausible.
  • Age of the brown dwarf = 1 Myr (0.5-2 Myr explored)
    Assumed from cluster age; affects the mass estimate.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The dark trail and 270-1954 are at the same distance (390 pc) and co-located in the Dark Bay.
    This is the key physical association assumption introduced in Section 3.1 and 3.3.
  • domain assumption The ambient Dark Bay dust follows a standard ISM power-law size distribution with amax ~ 0.25 micron and q=3.5.
    Used in Section 4 to compute opacities; the RV=5.5 alternative is explored but changes the required density.
  • standard math BHAC15 evolutionary models (Baraffe et al. 2015) and the Wang & Chen (2019) reddening law with RV=5.5 describe the point source SED.
    Used in Section 3.2 to estimate mass and extinction.
  • domain assumption The radiative transfer geometry is a uniform density slab with a narrow, uniform-density trail embedded in it, and scattering is treated as pure absorption (no diffuse scattering or forward scattering into the trail).
    This 1D approximation (Section 4.1) is explicit and the forward scattering caveat is addressed in Appendix A.
  • domain assumption External photoevaporation calculations with torus-3dpdr assume a 0.018 Msun central mass, discs of 5-20 au, and surface density ~100 g/cm^2 at 1 au with R^-1 profile.
    These are the initial conditions for the wind models in Section 5.3.
  • domain assumption The brown dwarf velocity is ~2 km/s, typical of ONC stars, and the sound speed is ~0.2 km/s, making the flow supersonic.
    Used for the trail width and BHL estimates in Sections 5.3.1 and 6.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A possible trail of dust from a young, highly-extincted brown dwarf in the outskirts of the Trapezium Cluster." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/T6WE7HLF

@misc{pith2026250204447,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A possible trail of dust from a young, highly-extincted brown dwarf in the outskirts of the Trapezium Cluster},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/T6WE7HLF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.04447}
}
abstract

We present the JWST discovery of a highly-extincted ($A_V\sim52$) candidate brown dwarf ($\sim0.018$M$_\odot$) in the outskirts of the Trapezium Cluster that appears to be coincident with the end of a $\sim 1700\,$au long, remarkably uniformly wide, dark trail that broadens only slightly at the end opposite the point source. We examine whether a dusty trail associated with a highly-extincted brown dwarf could plausibly be detected with JWST and explore possible origins. We show that a dusty trail associated with the brown dwarf could be observable if dust within it is larger than that in the ambient molecular cloud. For example, if the ambient cloud has a standard $\sim0.25$$\mu$m maximum grain size and the trail contains micron-sized grains, then the trail will have a scattering opacity over an order of magnitude larger compared to the surroundings in NIRCam short-wavelength filters. We use a simple model to show that a change in maximum grain size can reproduce the high $A_V$ and the multi-filter NIRCam contrast seen between the trail and its surroundings. We propose and explore two possible mechanisms that could be responsible for the trail: i) a weak FUV radiation-driven wind from the circum-brown dwarf disc due to the O stars in the region and ii) a Bondi-Hoyle-Lyttleton accretion wake. The former would be the most distant known case of the Trapezium stars' radiation driving winds from a disc, and the latter would be the first known example of ``late'' infall from the interstellar medium onto a low mass object in a high-mass star-forming region.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.04447 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. NIRCam F182M observations towards 270-1954, which exhibits an elongated dark tail. The 7 × 7 ′′ boxed region is shown more clearly in the inset. The arrows and associated labels denote the direction and distance to the main UV sources in the Trapezium Cluster. North is up and east left. The intensity scale is in MJy/sr. of −05:20, an additional digit is introduced at the start of the cor￾responding part of the label… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. A gallery showing 270-1954 and the associated dark trail in nine JWST NIRCam filters. Each image is 7 × 7 arcsec or ∼ 2720 × 2720 au in size, with North up, East left [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. An illustration of the cuts made across the trail associated with 270-1954. The red line is a cut across the trail. From 100 points along the red line we calculate the mean along the blue line parallel to the trail. We plot the resulting profiles in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (15 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The profile of the trail perpendicular to it, calculated as a the mean along the length of the trail, for the nine filter images shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: NIRCam SED of 270-1954 (blue line) as sampled by the nine NIRCam medium- and wide-band filters (yellow). The best-fitting BHAC15 model SED (Baraffe et al. 2015) with mass and extinction of 0.018 ±0.007𝑀⊙ and AV = 52 ± 9 mag is shown in red. The approximate limiting mag…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Colour-magnitude diagram of 270-1954 (blue). The full Trapez￾ium Cluster source catalogue is shown in grey (McCaughrean & Pearson 2023). The 1 Myr isochrone for the BHAC15 evolutionary models is shown in red (Baraffe et al. 2015), while the equivalent 1 Myr isochrone f…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The left-hand panel shows the locations of the 55 point sources within one arcminute of 270-1954, truncated on the northern side due to the declination limit of the survey. The right-hand panel plots the AV for each source as determined by SED fitting as a function of …
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: A cartoon illustrating the possible geometry of the region and 270-1954. The trapezium stars sit within a bowl-like region, with the main ionization front of the nebula on the far side from the observer. The Orion Bright Bar corresponds to where the main ionization fro…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: A schematic of the radiative transfer model we consider. The box is illuminated from below with a uniform intensity 𝐼0. A line-of-sight through the ambient medium has an observed intensity 𝐼𝐵𝐺. A line-of-sight through the trail includes a segment with a different maxi…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The total (absorption + scattering, upper panel), absorption-only (middle panel) and scattering-only (lower panel) opacities as a function of wavelength for Draine & Lee (1984) silicates with a 𝑞 = 3.5 power law size distribution and maximum grain sizes given in the le…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: The ratio of the trail-to-ambient intensities as a function of the cloud number density, similar to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: The reddening associated with maximum grain sizes for various power laws of the grain size distribution. The horizontal lines correspond to RV = 3.3 and RV = 5.5. medium) and the power law of the dust distribution is flattened to 𝑞 = 3 to give a higher RV. As illustra…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: The ratio of the trail-to-ambient intensities in our basic radiative transfer model as a function of the cloud number density. The panels are for the maximum grain size in the trail of 0.6, 1, and 10 𝜇m from top to bottom. Each has a power law of the grain size distri…
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: The ratio of trail to ambient intensities, similar to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Temperature as a function of X-ray ionisation parameter as in￾troduced by Owen et al. (2010, 2012). Marked is the temperature and cor￾responding ionisation parameter above which material would be unbound at 24 au from an 0.018 M⊙ object. number density, and 𝐷 is the d…
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Mass-loss rates (top), depletion timescale (instantaneous ratio of disc mass to mass loss rate, middle) and maximum entrainable grain sizes in external photoevaporative winds (bottom) as a function of the external FUV radiation field strength. The different lines are …
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: A schematic of the Bondi-Hoyle-Lyttleton accretion process. The brown dwarf propagates through the medium at velocity 𝑣𝐵𝐷. Material drawn to the trailing mid-plane within the stagnation radius is accreted, while mate￾rial beyond the stagnation radius is left in a wake…
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: The enhancement of density in the trail relative to the ambient medium as a function of the velocity of the point mass through the medium. Note that the velocities start at 0.2 km s−1 , so we are always considering the supersonic regime for 10 K gas. be coincident wit…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

99 extracted references · 24 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    P., Ferland G

    Abel N. P., Ferland G. J., O'Dell C. R., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab2a6e , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...881..130A 881, 130

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab2a6e 2019

  2. [2]

    C., Hollenbach D., Laughlin G., Gorti U., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/421989 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJ...611..360A 611, 360

    Adams F. C., Hollenbach D., Laughlin G., Gorti U., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/421989 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJ...611..360A 611, 360

    doi:10.1086/421989 2004

  3. [3]

    H., Hjellming R

    Balick B., Gammon R. H., Hjellming R. M., 1974, @doi [ ] 10.1086/129654 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1974PASP...86..616B 86, 616

    doi:10.1086/129654 1974

  4. [4]

    R., McCaughrean M

    Bally J., O'Dell C. R., McCaughrean M. J., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/301385 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000AJ....119.2919B 119, 2919

    work page doi:10.1086/301385 2000

  5. [5]

    Baraffe I., Homeier D., Allard F., Chabrier G., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201425481 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A&A...577A..42B 577, A42

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201425481 2015

  6. [6]

    Bern \'e O., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1088/1538-3873/ac604c , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022PASP..134e4301B 134, 054301

    doi:10.1088/1538-3873/ac604c 2022

  7. [7]

    Bern \'e O., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1038/s41586-023-06307-x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023Natur.621...56B 621, 56

    doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06307-x 2023

  8. [8]

    G., Haworth T

    Bisbas T. G., Haworth T. J., Barlow M. J., Viti S., Harries T. J., Bell T., Yates J. A., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv2156 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.454.2828B 454, 2828

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2156 2015

Show all 99 references
  1. [9]

    M., Pope T

    Blondin J. M., Pope T. C., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/700/1/95 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...700...95B 700, 95

    2009 doi

  2. [10]

    Bondi H., Hoyle F., 1944, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/104.5.273 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1944MNRAS.104..273B 104, 273

    1944 doi

  3. [11]

    A., Clarke C

    Booth R. A., Clarke C. J., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab090 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.502.1569B 502, 1569

    2021 doi

  4. [12]

    Burn R., Schlecker M., Mordasini C., Emsenhuber A., Alibert Y., Henning T., Klahr H., Benz W., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202140390 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...656A..72B 656, A72

    2021 doi

  5. [13]

    Chabrier G., Debras F., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abfc48 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...917....4C 917, 4

    2021 doi

  6. [14]

    Chabrier G., Baraffe I., Phillips M., Debras F., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202243832 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...671A.119C 671, A119

    2023 doi

  7. [15]

    B., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202347765 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...680A..19C 680, A19

    Changala P. B., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202347765 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...680A..19C 680, A19

    2023 doi

  8. [16]

    J., Pringle J

    Clarke C. J., Pringle J. E., 1993, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/261.1.190 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993MNRAS.261..190C 261, 190

    1993 doi

  9. [17]

    Coleman G. A. L., Haworth T. J., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac1513 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.514.2315C 514, 2315

    2022 doi

  10. [18]

    J., 2023, @doi [European Physical Journal Plus] 10.1140/epjp/s13360-022-03602-w , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023EPJP..138...11C 138, 11

    Cuello N., M \'e nard F., Price D. J., 2023, @doi [European Physical Journal Plus] 10.1140/epjp/s13360-022-03602-w , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023EPJP..138...11C 138, 11

    2023 doi

  11. [19]

    T., Lee H

    Draine B. T., Lee H. M., 1984, @doi [ ] 10.1086/162480 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1984ApJ...285...89D 285, 89

    1984 doi

  12. [20]

    Edgar R., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.newar.2004.06.001 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004NewAR..48..843E 48, 843

    2004 doi

  13. [21]

    Emsenhuber A., Mordasini C., Burn R., 2023, @doi [European Physical Journal Plus] 10.1140/epjp/s13360-023-03784-x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023EPJP..138..181E 138, 181

    2023 doi

  14. [22]

    J., Bisbas T

    Facchini S., Clarke C. J., Bisbas T. G., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw240 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.457.3593F 457, 3593

    2016 doi

  15. [23]

    S., Pascucci I., Apai D., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abcec8 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...908...49F 908, 49

    Fang M., Kim J. S., Pascucci I., Apai D., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abcec8 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...908...49F 908, 49

    2021 doi

  16. [24]

    C., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/527469 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...675.1361F 675, 1361

    Fatuzzo M., Adams F. C., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/527469 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...675.1361F 675, 1361

    2008 doi

  17. [25]

    E., Henning T., Jayawardhana R., Oliveira J

    Fedele D., van den Ancker M. E., Henning T., Jayawardhana R., Oliveira J. M., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/200912810 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010A&A...510A..72F 510, A72

    2010 doi

  18. [26]

    F., Ercolano B., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202039746 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...648A.121F 648, A121

    Flaischlen S., Preibisch T., Manara C. F., Ercolano B., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202039746 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...648A.121F 648, A121

    2021 doi

  19. [27]

    Flores C., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/acf7c1 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...958...98F 958, 98

    2023 doi

  20. [28]

    Foglizzo T., Galletti P., Ruffert M., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20042201 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005A&A...435..397F 435, 397

    2005 doi

  21. [29]

    A., Taam R

    Fryxell B. A., Taam R. E., 1988, @doi [ ] 10.1086/166973 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1988ApJ...335..862F 335, 862

    1988 doi

  22. [30]

    V., Feigelson E

    Getman K. V., Feigelson E. D., Garmire G. P., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac1746 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...920..154G 920, 154

    2021 doi

  23. [31]

    J., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab311a , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...882...33G 882, 33

    Giacalone S., Teitler S., K \"o nigl A., Krijt S., Ciesla F. J., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab311a , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...882...33G 882, 33

    2019 doi

  24. [32]

    P., Birnstiel T., Kuffmeier M., Yen H.-W., 2024a, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2401.10403 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240110403G p

    Gupta A., Miotello A., Williams J. P., Birnstiel T., Kuffmeier M., Yen H.-W., 2024a, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2401.10403 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240110403G p. arXiv:2401.10403

    doi arXiv

  25. [33]

    P., Birnstiel T., Kuffmeier M., Yen H.-W., 2024b, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202348007 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...683A.133G 683, A133

    Gupta A., Miotello A., Williams J. P., Birnstiel T., Kuffmeier M., Yen H.-W., 2024b, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202348007 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...683A.133G 683, A133

    doi

  26. [34]

    Haisch Jr. K. E., Lada E. A., Lada C. J., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1086/320685 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001ApJ...553L.153H 553, L153

    2001 doi

  27. [35]

    J., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2408.09319 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240809319H p

    Hallatt T., Lee E. J., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2408.09319 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240809319H p. arXiv:2408.09319

    2024 doi arXiv

  28. [36]

    J., Haworth T

    Harries T. J., Haworth T. J., Acreman D., Ali A., Douglas T., 2019, @doi [Astronomy and Computing] 10.1016/j.ascom.2019.03.002 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&C....27...63H 27, 63

    2019 doi

  29. [37]

    J., Facchini S., Clarke C

    Haworth T. J., Facchini S., Clarke C. J., Cleeves L. I., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slx037 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.468L.108H 468, L108

    2017 doi

  30. [38]

    J., Clarke C

    Haworth T. J., Clarke C. J., Rahman W., Winter A. J., Facchini S., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty2323 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.481..452H 481, 452

    2018 doi

  31. [39]

    J., et al., 2023a, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad2581 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.525.4129H 525, 4129

    Haworth T. J., et al., 2023a, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad2581 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.525.4129H 525, 4129

    doi

  32. [40]

    J., Coleman G

    Haworth T. J., Coleman G. A. L., Qiao L., Sellek A. D., Askari K., 2023b, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad3054 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.526.4315H 526, 4315

    doi

  33. [41]

    J., O'Dell C

    Henney W. J., O'Dell C. R., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1086/301087 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999AJ....118.2350H 118, 2350

    1999 doi

  34. [42]

    G., Greenstein J

    Henyey L. G., Greenstein J. L., 1941, @doi [ ] 10.1086/144246 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1941ApJ....93...70H 93, 70

    1941 doi

  35. [43]

    H., Terndrup D

    Herbig G. H., Terndrup D. M., 1986, @doi [ ] 10.1086/164447 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1986ApJ...307..609H 307, 609

    1986 doi

  36. [44]

    R., Jansen D

    Hogerheijde M. R., Jansen D. J., van Dishoeck E. F., 1995, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995A&A...294..792H 294, 792

    1995

  37. [45]

    A., 1939, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1939PCPS...34..405H 35, 405

    Hoyle F., Lyttleton R. A., 1939, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1939PCPS...34..405H 35, 405

    1939

  38. [46]

    Huang S., Portegies Zwart S., Wilhelm M. J. C., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2407.19018 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240719018H p. arXiv:2407.19018

    2024 doi arXiv

  39. [47]

    A., Clarke C

    Hutchison M. A., Clarke C. J., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa3608 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.501.1127H 501, 1127

    2021 doi

  40. [48]

    Kido M., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/acdd7a , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...953..190K 953, 190

    2023 doi

  41. [49]

    S., Clarke C

    Kim J. S., Clarke C. J., Fang M., Facchini S., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8205/826/1/L15 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...826L..15K 826, L15

    2016 doi

  42. [50]

    S., Haugb lle T., 2023, @doi [European Physical Journal Plus] 10.1140/epjp/s13360-023-03880-y , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023EPJP..138..272K 138, 272

    Kuffmeier M., Jensen S. S., Haugb lle T., 2023, @doi [European Physical Journal Plus] 10.1140/epjp/s13360-023-03880-y , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023EPJP..138..272K 138, 272

    2023 doi

  43. [51]

    J., Lada E

    Lada C. J., Lada E. A., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev.astro.41.011802.094844 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003ARA&A..41...57L 41, 57

    2003 arXiv

  44. [52]

    J., Alarc \'o n F., Cleeves L

    Law C. J., Alarc \'o n F., Cleeves L. I., \"O berg K. I., Paneque-Carre \ n o T., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ad0e06 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...959L..27L 959, L27

    2023 doi

  45. [53]

    H., Fern \'a ndez Aranda R., Pantaleoni Gonz \'a lez M., Crespo Bellido P., Sota A., Alfaro E

    Ma \' z Apell \'a niz J., Barb \'a R. H., Fern \'a ndez Aranda R., Pantaleoni Gonz \'a lez M., Crespo Bellido P., Sota A., Alfaro E. J., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202142364 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...657A.131M 657, A131

    2022 doi

  46. [54]

    S., Rumpl W., Nordsieck K

    Mathis J. S., Rumpl W., Nordsieck K. H., 1977, @doi [ ] 10.1086/155591 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1977ApJ...217..425M 217, 425

    1977 doi

  47. [55]

    Matsuda T., Isaka H., Ohsugi Y., 2015, @doi [Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics] 10.1093/ptep/ptv148 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015PTEP.2015k3E01M 2015, 113E01

    2015 doi

  48. [56]

    J., Pearson S

    McCaughrean M. J., Pearson S. G., 2023, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2310.03552 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023arXiv231003552M p. arXiv:2310.03552

    2023 doi arXiv

  49. [57]

    B., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/707/1/268 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...707..268M 707, 268

    Moeckel N., Throop H. B., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/707/1/268 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...707..268M 707, 268

    2009 doi

  50. [58]

    Ndugu N., Bitsch B., Jurua E., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx2815 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.474..886N 474, 886

    2018 doi

  51. [59]

    R., Wen Z., 1994, @doi [ ] 10.1086/174892 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994ApJ...436..194O 436, 194

    O'Dell C. R., Wen Z., 1994, @doi [ ] 10.1086/174892 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994ApJ...436..194O 436, 194

    1994 doi

  52. [60]

    R., Henney W

    O'Dell C. R., Henney W. J., Abel N. P., Ferland G. J., Arthur S. J., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/137/1/367 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009AJ....137..367O 137, 367

    2009 doi

  53. [61]

    R., Ferland G

    O'Dell C. R., Ferland G. J., Peimbert M., 2017a, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw2713 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.464.4835O 464, 4835

    doi

  54. [62]

    R., Kollatschny W., Ferland G

    O'Dell C. R., Kollatschny W., Ferland G. J., 2017b, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa6198 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...837..151O 837, 151

    doi

  55. [63]

    E., Ercolano B., Clarke C

    Owen J. E., Ercolano B., Clarke C. J., Alexander R. D., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15771.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010MNRAS.401.1415O 401, 1415

    2010

  56. [64]

    E., Clarke C

    Owen J. E., Clarke C. J., Ercolano B., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.20337.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.422.1880O 422, 1880

    2012

  57. [65]

    PDRs4All Team et al., 2024, @doi [Science] 10.1126/science.adh2861 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024Sci...383..988P 383, 988

    2024 doi

  58. [66]

    arXiv:2405.07334

    Padoan P., Pan L., Pelkonen V.-M., Haugboelle T., Nordlund A., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2405.07334 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240507334P p. arXiv:2405.07334

    2024 doi arXiv

  59. [67]

    K., 2023, in Inutsuka S., Aikawa Y., Muto T., Tomida K., Tamura M., eds, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series Vol

    Pascucci I., Cabrit S., Edwards S., Gorti U., Gressel O., Suzuki T. K., 2023, in Inutsuka S., Aikawa Y., Muto T., Tomida K., Tamura M., eds, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series Vol. 534, Protostars and Planets VII. p. 567 ( @eprint arXiv 2203.10068 ), @doi 10...

    2023 doi arXiv

  60. [68]

    W., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201937381 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...637A..38P 637, A38

    Phillips M. W., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201937381 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...637A..38P 637, A38

    2020 doi

  61. [69]

    E., Weber M

    Picogna G., Ercolano B., Owen J. E., Weber M. L., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz1166 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.487..691P 487, 691

    2019 doi

  62. [70]

    E., Segura-Cox D., Caselli P., Cunningham N., Zhao B., Schmiedeke A., Maureira M

    Pineda J. E., Segura-Cox D., Caselli P., Cunningham N., Zhao B., Schmiedeke A., Maureira M. J., Neri R., 2020, @doi [Nature Astronomy] 10.1038/s41550-020-1150-z , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020NatAs...4.1158P 4, 1158

    2020 doi

  63. [71]

    J., Sellek A

    Qiao L., Haworth T. J., Sellek A. D., Ali A. A., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac684 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.512.3788Q 512, 3788

    2022 doi

  64. [72]

    Qiao L., Coleman G. A. L., Haworth T. J., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad944 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.522.1939Q 522, 1939

    2023 doi

  65. [73]

    J., 2022, @doi [European Physical Journal Plus] 10.1140/epjp/s13360-022-03265-7 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022EPJP..137.1071R 137, 1071

    Reiter M., Parker R. J., 2022, @doi [European Physical Journal Plus] 10.1140/epjp/s13360-022-03265-7 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022EPJP..137.1071R 137, 1071

    2022 doi

  66. [74]

    R., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/136/5/2136 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008AJ....136.2136R 136, 2136

    Ricci L., Robberto M., Soderblom D. R., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/136/5/2136 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008AJ....136.2136R 136, 2136

    2008 doi

  67. [75]

    J., Kelly D., Horner S., 2005, in Heaney J

    Rieke M. J., Kelly D., Horner S., 2005, in Heaney J. B., Burriesci L. G., eds, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series Vol. 5904, Cryogenic Optical Systems and Instruments XI. pp 1--8, @doi 10.1117/12.615554

    2005 doi

  68. [76]

    E., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aac08f , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...859..150R 859, 150

    Rodriguez J. E., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aac08f , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...859..150R 859, 150

    2018 doi

  69. [77]

    A., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201116554 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011A&A...533A..38S 533, A38

    Scandariato G., Robberto M., Pagano I., Hillenbrand L. A., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201116554 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011A&A...533A..38S 533, A38

    2011 doi

  70. [78]

    D., Booth R

    Sellek A. D., Booth R. A., Clarke C. J., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz3528 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.492.1279S 492, 1279

    2020 doi

  71. [79]

    D., Clarke C

    Sellek A. D., Clarke C. J., Ercolano B., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac1148 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.514..535S 514, 535

    2022 doi

  72. [80]

    D., Grassi T., Picogna G., Rab C., Clarke C

    Sellek A. D., Grassi T., Picogna G., Rab C., Clarke C. J., Ercolano B., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2408.00848 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240800848S p. arXiv:2408.00848

    2024 doi arXiv

  73. [81]

    A., Konopacky Q

    Theissen C. A., Konopacky Q. M., Lu J. R., Kim D., Zhang S. Y., Hsu C.-C., Chu L., Wei L., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac3252 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...926..141T 926, 141

    2022 doi

  74. [82]

    B., Bally J., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/135/6/2380 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008AJ....135.2380T 135, 2380

    Throop H. B., Bally J., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/135/6/2380 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008AJ....135.2380T 135, 2380

    2008 doi

  75. [83]

    A., V \'a zquez-Semadeni E., G \'o mez G

    Toal \'a J. A., V \'a zquez-Semadeni E., G \'o mez G. C., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/744/2/190 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...744..190T 744, 190

    2012 doi

  76. [84]

    T., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202449395 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...687A..71V 687, A71

    Valdivia-Mena M. T., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202449395 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...687A..71V 687, A71

    2024 doi

  77. [85]

    Virtanen P., et al., 2020, @doi [Nature Methods] 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 , https://rdcu.be/b08Wh 17, 261

    2020 doi

  78. [86]

    Wang S., Chen X., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab1c61 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...877..116W 877, 116

    2019 doi

  79. [87]

    Wang K., Ge Y., Baug T., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202450296 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...686L..11W 686, L11

    2024 doi

  80. [88]

    M., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201526529 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A&A...582A.114W 582, A114

    Weilbacher P. M., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201526529 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A&A...582A.114W 582, A114

    2015 doi

  81. [89]

    Wilhelm M. J. C., Portegies Zwart S., Cournoyer-Cloutier C., Lewis S. C., Polak B., Tran A., Mac Low M.-M., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad445 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.520.5331W 520, 5331

    2023 doi

  82. [90]

    P., 1996, @doi [ ] 10.1086/309939 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996ApJ...459L..31W 459, L31

    Wilkin F. P., 1996, @doi [ ] 10.1086/309939 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996ApJ...459L..31W 459, L31

    1996 doi

  83. [91]

    J., Haworth T

    Winter A. J., Haworth T. J., 2022, @doi [European Physical Journal Plus] 10.1140/epjp/s13360-022-03314-1 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022EPJP..137.1132W 137, 1132

    2022 doi

  84. [92]

    J., Kruijssen J

    Winter A. J., Kruijssen J. M. D., Chevance M., Keller B. W., Longmore S. N., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz2747 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.491..903W 491, 903

    2020 doi

  85. [93]

    J., Haworth T

    Winter A. J., Haworth T. J., Coleman G. A. L., Nayakshin S., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac1564 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.515.4287W 515, 4287

    2022 doi

  86. [94]

    J., Benisty M., Andrews S

    Winter A. J., Benisty M., Andrews S. M., 2024a, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2405.08451 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240508451W p. arXiv:2405.08451

    doi arXiv

  87. [95]

    J., Benisty M., Manara C

    Winter A. J., Benisty M., Manara C. F., Gupta A., 2024b, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2409.17220 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240917220W p. arXiv:2409.17220

    doi arXiv

  88. [96]

    arXiv:2312.14056

    Zannese M., et al., 2023, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2312.14056 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023arXiv231214056Z p. arXiv:2312.14056

    2023 doi arXiv

  89. [97]

    E., Hacar A., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202346135 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...673L...2V 673, L2

    van Terwisga S. E., Hacar A., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202346135 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...673L...2V 673, L2

    2023 doi

  90. [98]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.stat...

  91. [99]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.stat...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.