Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 31 references

Kerr non-linearity enhances the response of a graphene Josephson bolometer

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A graphene Josephson parametric amplifier, biased in its nonlinear Kerr regime, operates as a bolometer with a noise-equivalent power of about 500 aW/√Hz.

desk verdict The nonlinear-enhancement effect is real and directly visible in the sidebands, but the 500 aW/√Hz NEP rests on a COMSOL heat-loss correction calibrated to the same experiment, so treat it as model-dependent. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.04911 v1 pith:HF4AF3VX submitted 2025-02-07 cond-mat.mes-hall

Joydip Sarkar , Krishnendu Maji , Abhishek Sunamudi , Heena Agarwal , Priyanka Samanta , Anirban Bhattacharjee , Rishiraj Rajkhowa , Meghan P. Patankar
show 3 more authors
Kenji Watanabe Takashi Taniguchi Mandar M. Deshmukh
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords grapheneJosephsonjunctionparametricamplifierbolometerKerrnonlinearitynoiseequivalentpowersidebandreadoutmicrowavedetectionhot-electronthermalization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports the first use of a Josephson parametric amplifier (JPA) as a bolometer. The central claim is that operating the JPA in the nonlinear, Kerr-dominated regime makes the device far more sensitive to heat: modulated heating produces sidebands roughly 100 times larger than in the linear regime, improving the noise-equivalent power by an order of magnitude to about 500 aW/√Hz. The device is built on a graphene Josephson junction with an on-chip heater, and it combines a thermal time constant of 4.26 µs with a broad, gate-tunable microwave band. If true, this points to a way of turning the intrinsic nonlinearity of Josephson devices into improved quantum sensors without sacrificing speed.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Kerr nonlinear inductance of the graphene Josephson junction, approximated from the current-phase relation Is(φ) ≈ αφ + βφ³, which gives a junction inductance LJ(φ) ≈ L0 + L2φ². This nonlinear inductance makes the reflected phase highly sensitive to temperature-induced changes in the junction, and it is what converts a modulated heater signal into sidebands at fs ± 2fh. The sideband power and the phase sensitivity in the nonlinear regime are the readout mechanism, while the on-chip graphene heater and the COMSOL thermal model with electron-phonon coupling supply the calibrated input power.

What would settle it

Measure the bolometer's NEP with an independent, absolute absorbed-power calibration, for example by feeding a known microwave power through a calibrated attenuator directly into the junction and comparing the resulting resonance shift with the heater calibration. If the true delivered power differs from (1 − |Γ|²)(1 − ηe−p)Pheater, the 500 aW/√Hz value changes by the same factor. A direct measurement of ηe−p by varying the heater-to-junction distance or changing the substrate would also test the correction.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that the Kerr nonlinearity of a graphene JPA, arising from the cubic term in the junction current-phase relation, is not merely tolerable but useful for bolometry. When the junction is biased with a pump tone in the nonlinear regime, small temperature changes from an injected heater signal produce large shifts in the reflected phase, and a modulated heater generates sidebands at fs ± 2fh whose power is about 20 dB higher than in the linear regime. Using this sideband response, the authors extract a noise-equivalent power of about 500 aW/√Hz at 1 MHz heater modulation, an order-of-magnitude improvement over linear biasing, and they measure thermal time constants τon = 4.45 µs and τoff = 4.26 µs, with an intrinsic JPA response of 70 ns. A control experiment in which the graphene heater is electrically severed shows that phonon-mediated heat transfer through the substrate also contributes to the response, and finite-element simulations estimate that about 35% of the injected heat is lost to the phonon bath.

Load-bearing premise

The reported 500 aW/√Hz noise-equivalent power assumes that only the fraction (1 − |Γ|²)(1 − ηe−p) of the heater power reaches the junction, with ηe−p ≈ 35% taken from a COMSOL simulation calibrated against the same experimental temperature data.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A single device achieves NEP ≈ 500 aW/√Hz with a thermal time constant of 4.26 µs and an intrinsic JPA time constant of 70 ns.
  • Biasing in the nonlinear regime raises sideband signals by about 20 dB, roughly 100 times, and improves sensitivity by an order of magnitude over linear biasing.
  • The gate-tunable resonance, spanning roughly 4 to 5.7 GHz, and an on-flake heater operating from DC to 100 MHz give the bolometer broad bandwidth and a fast, direct readout.
  • Because the nonlinear response is the sensing mechanism, the device can operate as a detector without relying on the slow switching histograms used in earlier Josephson bolometers.
  • The architecture could extend to direct irradiation in the THz and near-infrared ranges by using the graphene flake as a hot-electron bus, with further sensitivity gains from lower-gap superconductors such as aluminum.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the Kerr enhancement transfers to other Josephson devices, nonlinear biasing could become a standard sensitivity boost for bolometers and calorimeters beyond graphene-based ones.
  • The frequency-multiplexed sideband readout may allow large arrays of JPA bolometers on a single feed line, since each resonator is gate-tunable to a distinct frequency.
  • The roughly 35% phonon-loss correction implies that reducing substrate coupling, for example by suspending the graphene or using lower-gap superconducting contacts, could push the NEP well below 500 aW/√Hz.
  • The SNR hotspots observed in the nonlinear phase diagram suggest that the operating point could be further optimized, possibly approaching the bistable edge where phase sensitivity is largest.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a graphene Josephson parametric amplifier (JPA) operated as a bolometer, with an on-chip heater on the same graphene flake. A modulated heater current at frequency fh produces sidebands at fs ± 2fh in the reflected microwave signal. The authors compare sideband response in linear and nonlinear biasing, observe roughly 20 dB higher sideband power and a lower onset heater power in the nonlinear regime, and extract a best NEP of about 500 aW/√Hz after correcting the applied heater power for impedance mismatch and an estimated ~35% phonon-mediated heat loss. They also measure a thermal time constant of 4.26 μs and an intrinsic JPA response time of 70 ns, and support the phonon heat-loss channel with a control device in which the graphene heater is etched to remove the galvanic path.

Significance. The central qualitative claim—that Kerr nonlinearity enhances the bolometric sideband response—is directly visible in the data and is not circular: the linear-versus-nonlinear comparison is an independent measurement. The time-constant measurements are clean, and the paper is accompanied by extensive supplementary characterization, including a control experiment for phonon-mediated heating. If the absolute NEP value is robust, this would be a useful demonstration of a JPA-based bolometer with fast readout and gate tunability. However, the headline NEP depends on a COMSOL heat-loss correction whose parameters are calibrated against the same experimental dataset used to infer heating, so the numerical NEP is not yet established to the precision implied by the abstract.

major comments (3)
  1. [Supplementary Sec. V, Eq. S2; Supplementary Sec. XI] The corrected heater power in Eq. S2 contains the factor (1 − ηe−p) with ηe−p ≈ 35% taken from the COMSOL simulation in Sec. XI. That simulation is calibrated by matching the simulated electron temperature to the experimental temperature-versus-heater-current lookup table derived from the same resonance-shift data that defines the bolometer response. The control experiment in Fig. 4 demonstrates phonon-mediated heating qualitatively but does not provide an independent quantitative constraint on ηe−p. Since the extracted NEP in Eq. S1 is directly proportional to P′_heater, an uncertainty of, say, ±20% in ηe−p maps directly onto a comparable uncertainty in the quoted 500 aW/√Hz. The authors should either provide an independent thermal calibration, a conservative upper bound, or a propagation of the full parameter uncertainty into the NEP.
  2. [Supplementary Sec. XI, Tables 1 and 2] The thermal parameters used in the COMSOL model are internally inconsistent and are load-bearing for the heat-loss fraction. Table 1 lists a graphene literature thermal conductivity of 3×10⁻⁴ W/mK and an hBN simulation conductivity of 10⁻¹⁰ W/mK, both far from accepted values, and the simulation heat capacities differ from literature values by orders of magnitude. Table 2 lists a graphene thickness of 1 μm, which is not physical for a monolayer flake unless it is an effective modeling thickness. These entries suggest unit or notation errors, and they undermine confidence in the absolute heat flux that produces ηe−p ≈ 0.35. The authors should correct the table and quantify how ηe−p varies over a plausible range of the fitted parameters.
  3. [Main text, 'Time constants' paragraph; Fig. 5] The quoted bolometer thermal time constant of 4.26 μs is measured with the device biased in the linear regime, while the high-sensitivity bolometric operation is in the nonlinear regime. Figure 5d shows that the JPA response slows considerably as the drive power moves from linear to nonlinear and dissipative regimes. The manuscript should state the operating point for the 4.26 μs time constant explicitly and discuss whether the faster linear-regime time constant is representative of the nonlinear-biased bolometer used for the NEP measurement.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Supplementary Fig. S5] The horizontal axis is labeled in dBm and also written as P′_heater; please clarify whether the plotted quantity is the corrected heater power from Eq. S2 or the raw applied power, and state the units of the vertical NEP axis consistently.
  2. [Main text, Eq. (1)] The parameter tr in the current-phase relation is not defined in the main text; please define the averaged transparency and specify the regime in which the cubic expansion in φ is valid.
  3. [Main text, abstract and conclusion] The claim of an 'order of magnitude improvement in sensitivity' is supported by sideband power data in Fig. 3f, but no linear-regime NEP curve is shown. Since the same (1 − ηe−p) correction applies to both regimes the ordering is robust, but a direct linear-regime NEP extraction would make the sensitivity comparison quantitative rather than inferred from sideband response.
  4. [Fig. 4c and Supplementary Sec. XI] The control experiment in Fig. 4 would be more convincing with an overlay of the resonance-frequency shift before and after etching, including the heater-current range, so that the quantitative fraction of phonon-mediated transmission can be visually assessed.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Absolute NEP relies on a COMSOL-calibrated 35% heat-loss fraction; the nonlinear-vs-linear enhancement claim is independent.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Supplementary Section V, Eq. (S2); Supplementary Section XI, Fig. S14, Table 1]
    "We account for the fact that a finite fraction of the heat injected into the graphene heater leaks to the phonon bath before reaching the JJ. ... P ′ heater = Pheater ∗ (1 − |Γ|2) ∗ (1 − ηe−p). ... We use an experimental lookup table based on the supplementary Fig. S12, where we get the graphene electron temperature as a function of the Joule heating current. This data set is used to verify the observations from finite element simulations."

    The heat-loss fraction ηe−p used in Eq. (S2) is not an independently measured quantity. It is the output of a COMSOL model whose electron-phonon coupling constant (Σ = 0.6×10^6 W/K^4 m^2 in Table 1) is adjusted so that the simulated electron temperature matches the experimental Te-versus-heater-current lookup table, which is itself obtained from the same resonance-shift response that constitutes the bolometer signal. Inserting this model-derived η into NEP = Pheater(1−|Γ|^2)(1−ηe−p)/SNR makes the headline 500 aW/√Hz a self-consistent calibration rather than a parameter-free measurement. The linear-versus-nonlinear sideband comparison does not use η and therefore remains independent.

full rationale

The central empirical claim—that biasing the JPA in the Kerr-nonlinear regime enhances sideband power by ~100× and improves bolometric sensitivity by an order of magnitude—is a direct side-by-side measurement of sideband response versus heater power, and it does not reduce to any fitted parameter. I found no load-bearing self-citation chain: the prior graphene-JPA works cited by the authors (e.g., Ref. [23]) establish the amplifier platform, but the bolometric demonstration and the nonlinear-enhancement comparison are new measurements. The one genuine circular step is the absolute NEP calibration: the 35% phonon-loss correction is derived from a COMSOL simulation calibrated against the experimental temperature-versus-heater-current response, so the absolute NEP figure inherits a model that was tuned to the very response being quantified. Because the same (1−ηe−p) correction multiplies both linear and nonlinear power axes, the claimed enhancement ratio is robust to this issue. The anomalous literature value for graphene thermal conductivity in Table 1 (3×10^-4 W/mK) is a correctness or typographic concern rather than a circularity. Overall score 4 reflects a partially model-fitted headline number while the central qualitative claim is independent.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities or new conserved quantities. The central claim rests on the standard JPA nonlinearity model and on a simulation-derived heat-loss correction to the NEP, both of which bring fitted parameters into the headline number.

free parameters (3)
  • Electron-phonon coupling constant Σ_e-p in COMSOL = 0.6 × 10^6 W/K^4 m^2
    The simulation value in Table 1 differs from the literature value listed in the same table by orders of magnitude, and the simulation is calibrated to match the experimental temperature-current lookup table from Supplementary Fig. S12. This parameter controls the estimated 35% phonon heat loss used in Eq. S2.
  • Graphene thermal conductivity and heat capacity in simulation = k = 100 W/mK, C = 8 J/kg K
    These simulation values are far from the literature values listed in the same table (k = 3×10^-4 W/mK, C = 5.1×10^-6 J/kg K), and they strongly affect the heat flux reaching the JJ and hence the phonon-loss correction to NEP.
  • hBN thermal conductivity and heat capacity in simulation = k = 10^-10 W/mK, C = 20 J/kg K
    These values differ from literature values in the same table (k = 19 W/mK, C = 770 J/kg K), making hBN nearly thermally insulating in the model and directly affecting the heat-loss estimate used in the NEP correction.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The graphene JJ current-phase relation can be approximated as I_s ≈ α φ + β φ^3, with the cubic term giving the Kerr inductance used for the nonlinear response.
    The paper assumes the usual short-junction/transparent-channel form with a cubic nonlinearity (Eq. 1) to interpret the nonlinear phase diagram; the CPR is not independently measured.
  • domain assumption Sidebands at fs ± 2 fh arise purely from Joule heating of the JJ, whose temperature modulation is at 2 fh, with no significant direct microwave mixing from the heater line.
    Central to the bolometric interpretation. Direct nonlinear mixing would produce sidebands at fs ± fh, but the observed sidebands are at fs ± 2 fh; the authors do not quantify heater-line cross-talk.
  • domain assumption The resonance frequency shift produced by heater current maps one-to-one to junction temperature through the relation f_res ∝ √I_c.
    Used to interpret phase shifts as bolometric response; the actual I_c(T) relation for the graphene JJ is not independently verified.
  • ad hoc to paper The COMSOL heat-transfer model with the chosen e-p coupling and material parameters adequately represents heat flow to the phonon bath, so the resulting η_e-p ≈ 0.35 can be used in Eq. S2.
    The simulation is calibrated to the same experimental temperature data and uses parameters far from literature values, so it is not an independent constraint on NEP.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Kerr non-linearity enhances the response of a graphene Josephson bolometer." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HF4AF3VX

@misc{pith2026250204911,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Kerr non-linearity enhances the response of a graphene Josephson bolometer},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HF4AF3VX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.04911}
}
read the original abstract

Highly sensitive, broadband bolometers are of great interest because of their versatile usage in wide areas starting from dark matter search, radio astronomy, material science, and qubit readouts in cQED experiments. There have been different realizations of bolometers using superconducting thin films, nanowires, quantum dots, and various 2D materials in the recent past. The challenge is to have a single device that combines high sensitivity, broad bandwidth, a fast readout mechanism, and low noise. Here we demonstrate the first usage of a Josephson parametric amplifier (JPA) as a highly sensitive bolometer. Our key finding is the Kerr non-linearity of the JPA boosts the device's sensitivity. When the bolometer is biased in the non-linear regime, it enhances the sideband signals (~100 times), resulting in an order of magnitude improvement in sensitivity compared to the linear regime. In the non-linear biasing of the device, we achieve a NEP~500 aW/sqrt(Hz). Our bolometer offers a fast detection scheme with a thermal time constant of 4.26 us and an intrinsic JPA time constant of 70 ns. Our device's broadband and fast operation are key and new compared to previously studied graphene-based bolometers. In our device, the gate voltage tunability and the possibility of multiplexing combined with the sensitive bolometric performance offer an opportunity for integrated quantum sensor arrays. Our work demonstrates a way forward to enhance the performance of quantum sensors based on 2D materials by leveraging the inherent non-linear response.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.04911 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Device image, circuit model, and microwave response of the device. a, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Resonance frequency shift of the bolometer due to heating. a, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Graphene JPA as a sensitive bolometer. a, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Heat conduction through phonon channels. a, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Time constants of the bolometer. a, Shows the measured thermal time constant of the bolometer. We heat the bolometer using a short DC square pulse and simultaneously probe its response with a pump signal at 4.848 GHz, in the linear biasing of the device. The heater pul…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

31 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , author Ligato, N

    author Paolucci, F. , author Ligato, N. , author Germanese, G. , author Buccheri, V. & author Giazotto, F. title Fully Superconducting Josephson Bolometers for Gigahertz Astronomy . journal Applied Sciences volume 11 , pages 746 ( year 2021 )

    work page 2021

  2. [2]

    author Braine, T. et al. title Extended Search for the Invisible Axion with the Axion Dark Matter Experiment . journal Physical Review Letters volume 124 , pages 101303 ( year 2020 )

    work page 2020

  3. [3]

    author De Visser, P. J. , author Baselmans, J. J. A. , author Bueno, J. , author Llombart, N. & author Klapwijk, T. M. title Fluctuations in the electron system of a superconductor exposed to a photon flux . journal Nature Communications volume 5 , pages 3130 ( year 2014 )

    work page 2014

  4. [4]

    & author Mauskopf, P

    author Pirro, S. & author Mauskopf, P. title Advances in Bolometer Technology for Fundamental Physics . journal Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science volume 67 , pages 161--181 ( year 2017 )

    work page 2017

  5. [5]

    author Ikushima, K. et al. title Photon-counting microscopy of terahertz radiation . journal Applied Physics Letters volume 88 , pages 152110 ( year 2006 )

    work page 2006

  6. [6]

    author Inomata, K. et al. title Single microwave-photon detector using an artificial Λ-type three-level system . journal Nature Communications volume 7 , pages 12303 ( year 2016 )

    work page 2016

  7. [7]

    author Balembois, L. et al. title Cyclically Operated Microwave Single - Photon Counter with Sensitivity of 10 − 22 W / Hz . journal Physical Review Applied volume 21 , pages 014043 ( year 2024 )

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    author Yan, J. et al. title Dual-gated bilayer graphene hot-electron bolometer . journal Nature Nanotechnology volume 7 , pages 472--478 ( year 2012 )

    work page 2012

Show all 31 references
  1. [9]

    author Efetov, D. K. et al. title Fast thermal relaxation in cavity-coupled graphene bolometers with a Johnson noise read-out . journal Nature Nanotechnology volume 13 , pages 797--801 ( year 2018 )

    2018

  2. [10]

    author Lee, G.-H. et al. title Graphene-based Josephson junction microwave bolometer . journal Nature volume 586 , pages 42--46 ( year 2020 )

    2020

  3. [11]

    author Kokkoniemi, R. et al. title Bolometer operating at the threshold for circuit quantum electrodynamics . journal Nature volume 586 , pages 47--51 ( year 2020 )

    2020

  4. [12]

    author Walsh, E. D. et al. title Josephson junction infrared single-photon detector . journal Science volume 372 , pages 409--412 ( year 2021 )

    2021

  5. [13]

    author Oripov, B. G. et al. title A superconducting nanowire single-photon camera with 400,000 pixels . journal Nature volume 622 , pages 730--734 ( year 2023 )

    2023

  6. [14]

    author Cai, X. et al. title Sensitive room-temperature terahertz detection via the photothermoelectric effect in graphene . journal Nature Nanotechnology volume 9 , pages 814--819 ( year 2014 )

    2014

  7. [15]

    author El Fatimy, A. et al. title Epitaxial graphene quantum dots for high-performance terahertz bolometers . journal Nature Nanotechnology volume 11 , pages 335--338 ( year 2016 )

    2016

  8. [16]

    author Tielrooij, K. J. et al. title Photoexcitation cascade and multiple hot-carrier generation in graphene . journal Nature Physics volume 9 , pages 248--252 ( year 2013 )

    2013

  9. [17]

    author Brida, D. et al. title Ultrafast collinear scattering and carrier multiplication in graphene . journal Nature Communications volume 4 , pages 1987 ( year 2013 )

    1987

  10. [18]

    author Walsh, E. D. et al. title Graphene- Based Josephson - Junction Single - Photon Detector . journal Physical Review Applied volume 8 , pages 024022 ( year 2017 )

    2017

  11. [19]

    author Katti, R. et al. title Hot Carrier Thermalization and Josephson Inductance Thermometry in a Graphene - Based Microwave Circuit . journal Nano Letters ( year 2023 )

    2023

  12. [20]

    author Huang, B. et al. title Graphene calorimetric single-photon detector ( year 2024 ). note ArXiv:2410.22433 [cond-mat]

    2024 arXiv

  13. [21]

    title Superconducting Parametric Amplifiers : The State of the Art in Josephson Parametric Amplifiers

    author Aumentado, J. title Superconducting Parametric Amplifiers : The State of the Art in Josephson Parametric Amplifiers . journal IEEE Microwave Magazine volume 21 , pages 45--59 ( year 2020 )

    2020

  14. [22]

    , author Vijay, R

    author Hatridge, M. , author Vijay, R. , author Slichter, D. H. , author Clarke, J. & author Siddiqi, I. title Dispersive magnetometry with a quantum limited SQUID parametric amplifier . journal Physical Review B volume 83 , pages 134501 ( year 2011 )

    2011

  15. [23]

    author Sarkar, J. et al. title Quantum-noise-limited microwave amplification using a graphene Josephson junction . journal Nature Nanotechnology volume 17 , pages 1147--1152 ( year 2022 )

    2022

  16. [24]

    author Butseraen, G. et al. title A gate-tunable graphene Josephson parametric amplifier . journal Nature Nanotechnology volume 17 , pages 1153--1158 ( year 2022 )

    2022

  17. [25]

    author Halbertal, D. et al. title Imaging resonant dissipation from individual atomic defects in graphene . journal Science volume 358 , pages 1303--1306 ( year 2017 )

    2017

  18. [26]

    author Kong, J. F. , author Levitov, L. , author Halbertal, D. & author Zeldov, E. title Resonant electron-lattice cooling in graphene . journal Physical Review B volume 97 , pages 245416 ( year 2018 )

    2018

  19. [27]

    author Fried, C. et al. title Performance limits due to thermal transport in graphene single-photon bolometers . journal Physical Review Applied volume 21 , pages 014006 ( year 2024 )

    2024

  20. [28]

    author Opremcak, A. et al. title Measurement of a superconducting qubit with a microwave photon counter . journal Science volume 361 , pages 1239--1242 ( year 2018 )

    2018

  21. [29]

    author Gunyhó, A. M. et al. title Single-shot readout of a superconducting qubit using a thermal detector . journal Nature Electronics volume 7 , pages 288--298 ( year 2024 )

    2024

  22. [30]

    author Walter, A. B. et al. title The MKID Exoplanet Camera for Subaru SCExAO . journal Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific volume 132 , pages 125005 ( year 2020 )

    2020

  23. [31]

    author Fried, C. et al. title Performance limits due to thermal transport in graphene single-photon bolometers . journal Physical Review Applied volume 21 ( year 2024 )

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.