REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 17 references
Robustifying Fourier Features Embeddings for Implicit Neural Representations
T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash
Pith's one-line read The paper claims that unsampled frequency components set a loss floor for Fourier-feature INRs, and that a bias-free MLP filter lowers that floor.
desk verdict Worth a serious referee for the empirical filter trick, but the NTK lower-bound theory doesn't survive contact with the actual networks. read the letter →
The pith
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
The reading
What carries the argument
The load-bearing object is a bias-free MLP acting as an adaptive linear filter. Removing all additive biases makes the network a locally linear and scale-invariant operator, $f_{\text{BF}}(x)=A_x x$, so the filtered embedding $f_a(\gamma(v)) \otimes \gamma(v)$ stays a frequency-domain modulation of the original coordinates. The theoretical floor comes from a neural tangent kernel (NTK) analysis: for a two-layer ReLU MLP on Fourier features, the NTK can be Taylor-expanded so that its eigenfunctions are approximately sinusoids whose frequencies are integer combinations of the sampled frequencies. The target function then decomposes into the span of those sinusoids and its orthogonal complement, and the loss is bounded by the energy in that complement. These are the pieces that carry the argument: the NTK expansion supplies a learned frequency span, and the bias-free filter supplies a mechanism to enlarge that span locally.
What would settle it
Take a target function whose Fourier energy outside the sampled frequency set is known and nonzero, train the INR far past convergence on that target, and measure the final residual. If the residual energy falls below the orthogonal-complement energy of the target, or if the residual is not concentrated at the unsampled frequencies, the lower-bound lemma is contradicted.
Extended reading notes
Core claim
The central claim is that for a Fourier-feature embedded MLP whose training dynamics are approximated by the neural tangent kernel, the $L^2$ loss is bounded below by the norm of the component of the target function orthogonal to the span of the sampled frequencies, up to a convergence term. In other words, a finitely sampled Fourier embedding is not merely a hyperparameter choice but a hard performance floor. The paper's constructive counterpart is the adaptive linear filter $f_a(\gamma(v)) \otimes \gamma(v)$, implemented by an MLP with no additive biases. Because a bias-free ReLU network is locally linear and scale-invariant, multiplying the embedding entrywise by this learned filter preserves the frequency pattern of the signal. Trigonometry then shows that the Hadamard product of two embedding sinusoids creates sum and difference frequencies, so the filter can enrich the sampled frequency span while zeroing out harmful high-frequency components. The paper argues this reduces the loss floor, and its experiments on images, signed-distance shapes, and NeRF scenes show that the filtered embeddings beat the unfiltered baselines and several specialized INR architectures.
Load-bearing premise
The loss-floor proof assumes that a trained INR with Fourier features behaves like the neural tangent kernel of a two-layer MLP whose learned functions live in the span of the sampled frequencies; the experiments use deeper networks trained stochastically, so the bound has not been directly verified for those architectures.
Editorial extensions
If this is right
- If the lower bound holds, then adding more parameters to the INR cannot remove the error caused by unsampled frequencies; only widening or shifting the sampled frequency set before training can do that.
- Bias-free filters can be layered onto existing Fourier-feature pipelines without changing the INR's loss function, giving the gains shown on image, shape, and NeRF experiments.
- Suppressing high-frequency channels in flat regions and amplifying them at boundaries should make the learned fields smoother in uniform areas while keeping detail, which matters for downstream geometry extraction and rendering.
- Since the filter is continuous rather than grid-based, the same mechanism is applicable to coordinate regression problems where grids are not available.
Reading between the lines
- The paper's proof assumes a two-layer NTK regime, but its robustness result under high embedding standard deviation suggests the filter's benefit may not depend on that regime; testing the ablation on a deliberately non-NTK architecture would separate the theorem from the mechanism.
- If the loss-floor view is right, one could initialize the filter to mask frequencies known to be absent from the target, turning the adaptive filter into a learned prior; the paper does not explore this initialization.
- The line-search result is demonstrated on image and NeRF tasks; a natural extension is to use the same relative learning-rate rule for coordinate networks with non-L2 losses, where the Taylor derivation would need to be rechecked.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The paper addresses noise and spectral-bias issues in Fourier-feature implicit neural representations (INRs). It proposes (i) an adaptive linear filter implemented as a bias-free ReLU MLP applied to the Fourier embedding via a Hadamard product, and (ii) a line-search-based learning-rate adjustment for that filter. The authors support this design with a theoretical analysis in Appendix I, claiming that unsampled frequency components of the embeddings provide a lower bound on the INR loss and that enriching the embedding frequencies reduces this lower bound. Experiments on Kodak image regression, Stanford 3D-shape regression, and NeRF Blender scenes report consistent improvements over MLP+PE, MLP+RFF, SIREN, GAUSS, WIRE, and BACON.
Significance. If the theoretical validation were correct, the paper would offer a principled explanation for the noisy outputs of Fourier-feature INRs and a practical method to suppress that noise while preserving high-frequency detail. The empirical results are consistently positive, and the ablations indicate that both the filter module and the line-search module contribute to the gains. However, the central theorem is not valid as stated, and the line-search derivation is also incorrect. Since the method's motivation in the abstract and Section 5 relies on these theoretical claims, the paper's main conceptual contribution is not established. The empirical method may still be useful, but the manuscript in its current form overstates the theoretical support.
major comments (4)
- [Appendix I, Lemma I.6] The proof of Lemma I.6 is mathematically incorrect. Setting a = y†B and b = yB - f, the claimed lower bound ||y - f||^2 >= ||y†B||^2 - ||yB - f||^2 does not follow from the reverse triangle inequality; the reverse triangle inequality gives ||a + b|| >= | ||a|| - ||b|| |, which does not imply the stated quadratic inequality. In fact, because y†B and yB - f are orthogonal, Pythagoras's theorem gives the exact equality ||y - f||^2 = ||y†B||^2 + ||yB - f||^2. Thus the negative NTK term in the lemma is unjustified, and the theorem as stated is false. Although a corrected theorem could be obtained from the exact equality, the current statement and proof require substantial revision.
- [Appendix I, Lemma I.4 and Lemma I.6] The claim that the trained INR can be represented with frequencies only in the finite span of the sampled embedding frequencies is an artifact of truncating the Taylor expansion of arccos in Lemma I.4. The exact NTK kernel is F(γ(x)·γ(z)) = γ(x)·γ(z)(π - arccos(γ(x)·γ(z)))/(2π), whose power series has infinitely many terms; the k-th power of γ(x)·γ(z) contributes frequencies that are k-fold integer combinations of the sampled b_i, with k unbounded. For positional encoding with a unit on-axis frequency these combinations cover all integers, and for random Fourier features with incommensurate frequencies they are dense. Consequently, the exact NTK, let alone the deep ReLU networks trained in Section 6, is not bandlimited to the finite span defining y†B. The lower bound ∥y†B∥^2 is therefore not a property of the actual models evaluated, and the paper's statement that the adaptive filter reduces the achievable loss by lowering this bound is not supported.
- [Section 5.1] The frequency-enrichment derivation models the filter as o_i = Σ_j a_ij sin(b_j v) sin(b_i v) and uses the trigonometric identity to conclude that the filter can create frequencies b_i ± b_j. This treats the coefficients a_ij as constants with respect to v. In the proposed method, however, fa(·) is a multi-layer bias-free ReLU MLP, so A_x depends nonlinearly on γ(v); the matrix entries are piecewise constant functions of the input, and their global frequency content is not limited to the sampled b_j. Thus the claim that bias-free MLPs enrich the embedding frequencies as a linear filter does not follow from the given calculation. The distinction between the local matrix representation f(x) = A_x x and a globally linear filter needs to be addressed.
- [Appendix J.1, Algorithm 3] The line-search procedure is derived by minimizing a linear approximation ϕ(αA) ≈ k αA + b over a bounded interval. For a linear function, the constrained minimizer is at an endpoint of the interval (αmin if k > 0, αmax if k < 0), not at the root α = -b/k selected in Algorithm 3. The case analysis in lines 8–16 of Algorithm 3 does not correspond to this minimization problem. Additionally, the assertion that the second-order Taylor terms vanish because ReLU is piecewise linear ignores that the loss as a function of the full parameter vector remains nonlinear through the composition of layers. The proposed learning-rate adjustment is therefore not a correctly derived optimization method, and its favorable empirical effect needs to be justified differently.
minor comments (6)
- [Appendix I, Theorem I.5] The displayed formula has a square on the left-hand side and a square root on the right-hand side; the intended norm ordering should be stated consistently, and the hypotheses of Arora et al. (full-batch training, width and learning-rate bounds) should be explicitly invoked before this theorem is used.
- [Appendix I, Lemma I.4] The notation is inconsistent around ℵ: it is defined as ||γ(x)|| ||γ(z)||, but later the factor 1/ℵ appears or is omitted in several lines of the derivation, and the Taylor coefficient (2n)!/(2^{2n}(n!)^2) misses the usual (2n+1) denominator from the arccos series.
- [Figure 2 caption] The caption states that 'scale=512 can be considered to have standard deviation around 121' without explaining the conversion between the PE scale and the RFF standard deviation; this should be clarified.
- [Section 6.4] The text refers to 'Lambda Learning rate scheduler' and 'L' for the line-search; the scheduler should be properly named and cited, and the abbreviations in Table 4 should be defined in the caption.
- [Tables 1–3] The tables report single runs without variance or statistical significance; given the large reported improvements, at least a few repeated runs or error bars would strengthen the empirical claims.
- [Appendix J notation table] The symbol table in Appendix J defines p_t but not p_t^I and p_t^A until later in the text; a brief definition would improve readability.
Circularity Check
No circularity; the lower-bound theorem follows from external NTK and orthogonal-decomposition results and is not defined in terms of the method's own outputs.
full rationale
The paper's central theoretical claim—that unsampled frequency components of Fourier feature embeddings lower-bound achievable INR loss—is derived in Appendix I from an external NTK theorem (Arora et al., 2019) and external trigonometric lemmas (Yuce et al., 2022). Lemma I.6 applies orthogonal decomposition to a representation assumed bandlimited in the sampled frequency span; the lower bound is a direct mathematical consequence of that assumption rather than a quantity fitted from the paper's own experiments. The adaptive linear filter and its frequency-enrichment property are justified by an explicit trigonometric identity, not by circular reference to the method's success. The experimental sections benchmark against independent baselines and external datasets, and the line-search is a learning-rate adjustment mechanism rather than a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. No self-citations are load-bearing anywhere in the derivation. The gap between the two-layer NTK analysis and the deep stochastic networks actually trained, and the reverse-triangle-inequality step in Lemma I.6, are validity or correctness concerns rather than circularity. Hyperparameters such as filter depth and line-search bounds are tuned on the evaluation tasks, but hyperparameter tuning does not make the derivation circular. Accordingly, no circular step is identified.
Assumptions & free parameters
free parameters (3)
- Number of filter layers =
3
- Line-search max/min learning rate =
1e-3 to 0
- Armijo constant c1 and stability epsilon =
c1 = 1e-3, epsilon = 1e-6
assumptions (4)
- domain assumption The two-layer NTK convergence theorem of Arora et al. applies to the networks under test.
- domain assumption The NTK eigenfunctions of an MLP with Fourier features are approximately sinusoids in the span of the sampled frequencies.
- standard math Bias-free ReLU MLPs are exactly locally linear and scale-invariant.
- standard math The target function admits an L2 Fourier decomposition and can be orthogonally decomposed into a spanned and an orthogonal frequency subspace.
Cite this review
Pith. "Pith review of Robustifying Fourier Features Embeddings for Implicit Neural Representations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TSCKK223
@misc{pith2026250205482,
author = {Pith},
title = {Pith review of: Robustifying Fourier Features Embeddings for Implicit Neural Representations},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TSCKK223}},
note = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.05482}
}
read the original abstract
Implicit Neural Representations (INRs) employ neural networks to represent continuous functions by mapping coordinates to the corresponding values of the target function, with applications e.g., inverse graphics. However, INRs face a challenge known as spectral bias when dealing with scenes containing varying frequencies. To overcome spectral bias, the most common approach is the Fourier features-based methods such as positional encoding. However, Fourier features-based methods will introduce noise to output, which degrades their performances when applied to downstream tasks. In response, this paper initially hypothesizes that combining multi-layer perceptrons (MLPs) with Fourier feature embeddings mutually enhances their strengths, yet simultaneously introduces limitations inherent in Fourier feature embeddings. By presenting a simple theorem, we validate our hypothesis, which serves as a foundation for the design of our solution. Leveraging these insights, we propose the use of multi-layer perceptrons (MLPs) without additive
Figures
Figures from the paper (13 more)
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
Theorem I.5 (Theorem 4.1 in Arora et al
15 Robustifying Fourier Features Embeddings for Implicit Neural Representations k(γ(x), γ(z)) = ⟨γ(x), γ(z)⟩(π − arccos(⟨γ(x), γ(z)⟩) 2π Denoting ||γ(x)||||γ(z)|| as ℵ = Pm i=1 cos(2πbi(z − x))(π − arccos( 1 ℵ Pm i=1 cos(2πbi(z − x)))) 2πℵ By N-order approximation Taylor Expansion of arccos(·) = 1 2πℵ ( mX i=1 cos(2πbi(z − x))× ( π 2 + NX k=1 (2n)! 22n (n...
work page 2019
-
[2]
Implicit geometric regularization for learning shapes
Gropp, A., Yariv, L., Haim, N., Atzmon, M., and Lipman, Y . Implicit geometric regularization for learning shapes. arXiv preprint arXiv:2002.10099,
arXiv 2002
-
[5]
K., Jack, D., Baktashmotlagh, M., and Eriksson, A
Michalkiewicz, M., Pontes, J. K., Jack, D., Baktashmotlagh, M., and Eriksson, A. Implicit surface representations as layers in neural networks. In 2019 IEEE/CVF In- ternational Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), pp. 4742–4751,
work page 2019
-
[6]
bias term tested on the NeRF task
The result of adaptive linear filter w/w.o. bias term tested on the NeRF task. Bias MLP+PE Bias-free MLP+PE Bias MLP+RFF Bias-free MLP+RFF PSNR↑ 31.17 31.45 30.18 30.70 SSIM↑ 0.9563 0.9596 0.9476 0.9542 LPIPS↓ 0.0201 0.0172 0.0293 0.0232 G. Definition of High-dimensional Fourier Series For a d-dimensional periodic function f (x) with input x = [x1, x2, · ...
work page 2017
-
[7]
Mohan, S., Kadkhodaie, Z., Simoncelli, E. P., and Fernandez-Granda, C. Robust and interpretable blind image denoising via bias-free convolutional neural net- works. arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.05478,
arXiv 1906
-
[8]
Neural Gaussian Scale-Space Fields
Mujkanovic, F., Nsampi, N. E., Theobalt, C., Seidel, H.-P., and Leimk¨uhler, T. Neural gaussian scale-space fields. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.20980,
-
[10]
A sampling theory perspective on acti- vations for implicit neural representations
Saratchandran, H., Ramasinghe, S., Shevchenko, V ., Long, A., and Lucey, S. A sampling theory perspective on acti- vations for implicit neural representations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.05427,
-
[12]
Spline Positional Encoding for Learning 3D Implicit Signed Distance Fields
Wang, P.-S., Liu, Y ., Yang, Y .-Q., and Tong, X. Spline posi- tional encoding for learning 3d implicit signed distance fields. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.01553,
Show all 17 references
-
[13]
Comparison with SAPE There might be arguing that our proposed method is similar to SAPE (Hertz et al., 2021)
10 Robustifying Fourier Features Embeddings for Implicit Neural Representations A. Comparison with SAPE There might be arguing that our proposed method is similar to SAPE (Hertz et al., 2021). However, from our perspective, we differ from this work in the following points: • O...
2021
-
[14]
The learning rates of the adaptive linear filter steadily decrease throughout training, ultimately converging to 0, confirming the algorithm’s stability and convergence by the end of training. 11 Robustifying Fourier Features Embeddings for Implicit Neural Representations 0 20...
2000
-
[2016]
Pumarola, A., Corona, E., Pons-Moll, G., and Moreno- Noguer, F
doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2016.08.032. Pumarola, A., Corona, E., Pons-Moll, G., and Moreno- Noguer, F. D-nerf: Neural radiance fields for dynamic scenes. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pp. 10318– 10327,
2016 doi
-
[2019]
Mildenhall, B., Srinivasan, P
doi: 10.1109/ICCV .2019.00484. Mildenhall, B., Srinivasan, P. P., Tancik, M., Barron, J. T., Ramamoorthi, R., and Ng, R. Nerf: Representing scenes as neural radiance fields for view synthesis. Communica- tions of the ACM, 65(1):99–106,
2019
-
[2020]
Adaptive learning rate and momentum for training deep neural net- works
Hao, Z., Jiang, Y ., Yu, H., and Chiang, H.-D. Adaptive learning rate and momentum for training deep neural net- works. In Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases. Research Track: European Conference, ECML PKDD 2021, Bilbao, Spain, September 13–17, 2021, Proceedi...
2021
-
[2021]
S., and Cabral, R
Landgraf, Z., Hornung, A. S., and Cabral, R. S. Pins: pro- gressive implicit networks for multi-scale neural repre- sentations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.04713,
-
[2022]
Lemma I.1
where they show that the INRs with embeddings can be decomposed into the Fourier basis, we view the INRs with Fourier features embeddings from the perspective of Neural Tangent Kernels and derive a similar result about the Harmonic expansion of the INRs. Lemma I.1. (Y¨uce et a...
2022
-
[2023]
N., and Shri- vastava, A
Chen, H., He, B., Wang, H., Ren, Y ., Lim, S. N., and Shri- vastava, A. Nerv: Neural representations for videos. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 34: 21557–21568, 2021a. Chen, Y ., Liu, S., and Wang, X. Learning continuous image representation with local impl...
2022
-
[2024]
Shenouda, J., Zhou, Y ., and Nowak, R. D. Relus are suffi- cient for learning implicit neural representations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.02529,
Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.