Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 36 references

Quantum kinetic theory of the semiclassical side jump, skew scattering and longitudinal velocity

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A direct density-matrix derivation of the semiclassical Boltzmann equation uncovers a missing longitudinal velocity correction that must be added to the side-jump velocity and to the collision integral.

desk verdict A serious density-matrix derivation of the semiclassical Boltzmann equation with a genuinely new velocity term; the longitudinality claim is borrowed from a citation and should be derived or made an explicit assumption. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.05544 v2 pith:FQZTOEVC submitted 2025-02-08 cond-mat.mes-hall

Da Ma , Zhi-Fan Zhang , Hua Jiang , X. C. Xie This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords quantumkinetictheorydensitymatrixBoltzmannequationsidejumpskewscatteringlongitudinalvelocityBerrycurvaturedisorderaveraging
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to show that the semiclassical Boltzmann equation—the standard kinetic equation for electrons in crystals—follows directly from the quantum Liouville equation for the density matrix, and that this derivation exposes a missing piece. Together with the side-jump velocity (the lateral position shift an electron suffers when scattered by an impurity), there is a second correction, the longitudinal velocity: a principal-value sum over interband virtual transitions that at leading order points along the electric field and produces a current that survives time-reversal symmetry. The paper also argues that the familiar semiclassical side-jump collision integral is only the moderate-temperature approximation of the quantum result, and that the longitudinal velocity must be added both to the velocity and to the field-corrected collision integral. Skew scattering (the antisymmetric part of the scattering rate) is recovered at order $V^3$ and Gaussian order $V^4$, consistent with other methods. If these claims are right, the Boltzmann equation is not a heuristic mixture of classical kinetics and wave-packet motion but a genuine quantum-mechanical limit, with a new longitudinal correction that should show up in longitudinal and nonlinear transport.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing structure is the quantum Liouville equation in the interaction picture, split into a diagonal part $f^{m}_{\mathbf{k}}$ (the distribution function) and an off-diagonal part $S^{mm'}_{\mathbf{k}}$ (interband coherence), then solved perturbatively in the small parameter $n_i V^2$. Two identities carry the argument: the commutator $[\hat{V},\hat{\mathbf{r}}]=0$, which rewrites interband Berry connection differences as momentum gradients and produces the side-jump coordinate shift $\delta\mathbf{r}^{m}_{\mathbf{k}'\mathbf{k}}$; and the principal-value reduction that defines $v^{L,m}_{\mathbf{k}}$ in Eq. (37). These identities let one separate the side-jump current into velocity and distribution-function pieces and show that the same longitudinal velocity enters the field-corrected collision integral. The higher-order skew-scattering rates come from iterating the commutator expansion to third and fourth order in $\hat{U}$ and performing the impurity ensemble average completely, including crossing and non-crossing terms.

What would settle it

In a minimal two-band model with short-range impurities, evaluate the longitudinal velocity $v^{L,m}_{\mathbf{k}}$ in Eq. (37) and the current it produces, then compute the linear longitudinal conductivity from the full density-matrix equation. If the conductivity differs from the standard Boltzmann result without $v^{L}$ in a way that matches the $v^{L}$ correction, the claim is supported; if the $v^{L}$-induced current vanishes or becomes transverse in a time-reversal-symmetric model, the longitudinality and time-reversal part of the claim is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper's central discovery is that the density-matrix description of transport contains an additional interband contribution to the semiclassical side-jump velocity, $v^{L,m}_{\mathbf{k}}$ in Eq. (37), arising from virtual transitions between bands during impurity scattering. Because $\hat{V}$ commutes with $\hat{\mathbf{r}}$, the combination of off-diagonal Berry connections and impurity matrix elements collapses into momentum gradients, separating the side-jump velocity $v^{sj,m}_{\mathbf{k}}$ (with coordinate shift $\delta\mathbf{r}^{m}_{\mathbf{k}'\mathbf{k}}$) from the longitudinal velocity $v^{L,m}_{\mathbf{k}}$ (a principal-value integral). The paper claims that the current from $v^{L}$ is longitudinal at leading order and survives time-reversal symmetry, so it does not affect anomalous Hall analyses but should contribute to longitudinal transport. The full recovered Boltzmann equation therefore carries a total velocity $\bar{v}^{m}_{\mathbf{k}} = v^{m}_{\mathbf{k}} + \frac{e}{\hbar}\mathbf{E}\times\Omega^{m}_{\mathbf{k}} + v^{sj,m}_{\mathbf{k}} + v^{L,m}_{\mathbf{k}}$, and the same $v^{L}$ corrects the collision integral through the field-induced energy shift. Finally, the paper shows that the density-matrix skew-scattering rates at order $V^3$ and $V^4$ agree with the semiclassical results, including Gaussian skew scattering built from both crossing and non-crossing impurity averages.

Load-bearing premise

The paper takes from an earlier work, without deriving it, the property that the current from the longitudinal velocity is longitudinal and survives time-reversal symmetry; if that property fails for general impurity potentials, the headline claim about a time-reversal-preserving longitudinal current collapses, even though the velocity correction itself might survive.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The semiclassical Boltzmann equation is recovered from quantum mechanics with a specific velocity composition, so any transport calculation using only group, Berry-curvature, and side-jump velocities is incomplete.
  • The longitudinal velocity contributes to longitudinal current without breaking time reversal, so it should appear in longitudinal transport experiments and in nonlinear longitudinal response, not only in Hall geometries.
  • At low temperatures the semiclassical side-jump collision integral must be replaced by the full density-matrix expression; using the Fermi-surface derivative $\partial f_0/\partial\varepsilon$ loses part of the interband coherence information.
  • The order-$V^3$ skew-scattering rate is intraband, while the Gaussian order-$V^4$ rate necessarily involves interband virtual transitions, so the two mechanisms have distinct band-structure requirements.
  • Elastic scattering by static impurities produces a collision integral with no Pauli-blocking factors; the textbook $1-f$ factors would generate spurious nonlinear terms once skew scattering is included.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct test would be to compute $v^{L,m}_{\mathbf{k}}$ in a concrete two-band model and compare the resulting linear longitudinal conductivity against the linear-response value; if they match, $v^{L}$ is the missing quantum correction, and if not, the longitudinality premise needs revisiting.
  • Since the $v^{L}$ current survives time-reversal symmetry, it may be the leading disorder-induced geometric contribution to longitudinal transport in time-reversal-invariant systems, and it could leave a signature in second-order rectified currents; this goes beyond the paper, which only flags nonlinear transport as a likely venue.
  • The same interaction-picture expansion could be pushed to nonlinear response: the principal-value, interband character of $v^{L}$ resembles the kernels that generate second-order photocurrents, so the density-matrix route may supply an independent derivation of those rectification coefficients.
  • One subtlety the paper leaves open: the longitudinality of $v^{L}$ is asserted for leading order and referenced rather than derived, so testing it for spin-orbit-coupled impurity potentials would determine whether the time-reversal statement holds beyond the simple scalar-potential case.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. This manuscript derives the semiclassical Boltzmann transport equation from the quantum Liouville equation for a homogeneous multiband electron system with weak uncorrelated impurities in a uniform ac electric field. Using a perturbative solution in powers of n_i V^2 and separating the diagonal (f) and off-diagonal (S) components of the density matrix, the authors recover the conventional group velocity, the Berry-curvature anomalous velocity, and the semiclassical side-jump velocity. They identify a new 'longitudinal velocity' vL,m_k (Eq. 37) entering both the current and the field-corrected collision integral, assert that its current is longitudinal and survives time-reversal symmetry, and argue that the semiclassical side-jump collision integral is a moderate-temperature approximation of the quantum result. They also derive skew-scattering rates at order V^3 and V^4, including crossing and non-crossing impurity averages, and state agreement with previous approaches.

Significance. If established, this is a useful formal contribution: it offers a transparent order-by-order mapping between the quantum Liouville equation and the semiclassical Boltzmann equation, reproduces known results (anomalous velocity, coordinate shift, V^3 skew scattering), and pinpoints a correction term that previous density-matrix treatments missed. The full impurity-ensemble averaging of the V^4 Gaussian skew-scattering terms and the explicit identities in Appendix A are strengths. The main open point is the unproved longitudinal/time-reversal property of the vL current; the paper's headline novelty depends on it. A concrete model calculation would substantially increase confidence. The paper is not circular: it starts from the Liouville equation and uses earlier semiclassical expressions only as comparison benchmarks.

major comments (4)
  1. [§III, Eq. (37) and the paragraph immediately after] The claim that the current induced by vL,m_k is longitudinal at leading order and survives time-reversal symmetry is not derived; it is delegated to Ref. [23]. This property is load-bearing for the abstract's claim that the new current does not require time-reversal symmetry breaking and for the name 'longitudinal velocity.' The principal-value integral in Eq. (37) is a momentum-space vector whose orientation is not manifestly longitudinal, and no symmetry argument is given for the vanishing of its transverse component for a generic impurity potential. Please derive this property from Eq. (37), state the precise conditions on the impurity potential and band structure under which it holds, and ideally test it on a concrete two-band model with short-range impurities by computing the resulting conductivity tensor.
  2. [§II, Eqs. (7)–(10)] The passage from the time-integral form of the collision term in Eq. (7) to the algebraic expression in Eq. (10) requires a Markov approximation: the density matrix ρ_E,I(t1) inside the convolution must be evaluated at the final time t, and the lower limit must be extended to -∞ to produce the energy denominators. This approximation is not stated or justified. Because Eq. (10) underlies all subsequent collision integrals, please state the approximation explicitly and give its validity range (for example, slow variation of ρ_E,I on the time scale of the memory kernel), and verify that this is compatible with the low-frequency assumption already used.
  3. [§III, Eqs. (42)–(43)] The replacement of (f0^{m'} - f0^m)/(ε^{m'} - ε^m) by ∂f0/∂ε evaluated at the Fermi surface is a moderate-temperature approximation; the text acknowledges this, but the central comparison with the semiclassical side-jump collision integral is made only under this assumption. The error is not quantified. Please provide an estimate of the correction (for example, in terms of k_B T relative to the relevant band energy offsets or the distance of the Fermi surface from the band edges) and state explicitly that the recovery of Eq. (43) and the resulting side-jump collision integral is not claimed at low temperatures.
  4. [§III, Eqs. (42)–(43)] The step from Eq. (42) to Eq. (43) is an unshown algebraic identity involving cancellations of Berry-connection terms and the emergence of vsj + vL. Since this step is the bridge between the density-matrix result and the semiclassical side-jump collision integral, please provide the derivation in an appendix or a supplementary note, or at least display the intermediate identities used to perform the cancellation.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Throughout] There are several typographical errors: 'will leads' in Sec. II, 'scatteing' in Sec. IV, and 'the face that' instead of 'the fact that' in Appendix A near Eq. (S1).
  2. [§III, Eq. (44)] The collision integral in Eq. (44) is quoted from Ref. [22] rather than derived from the preceding equations; if it is meant to follow from Eq. (43), the steps should be shown, and if it is a benchmark quoted from the literature, the text should say so explicitly.
  3. [§IV, Eqs. (51), (55)–(60)] The agreement of the V^3 and V^4 skew-scattering rates with prior work would be easier to check if the authors cited the specific equations in Refs. [5, 8, 22] that contain the corresponding results, rather than stating the agreement in words.
  4. [§III, Eq. (39)] The exclusion of the Smm_2,k(t) contribution to J_mm_S,k(t) is explained in one sentence, but the order-counting logic would be clearer if a short footnote or appendix paragraph laid out why this contribution belongs to the V^4 Gaussian skew-scattering terms.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the density-matrix derivation is self-contained, with external benchmarks and only incidental self-citations.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation starts from the quantum Liouville equation (Eq. 1) and obtains the Boltzmann equation, side-jump currents, and skew-scattering rates by systematic perturbative expansion in niV^2, with no parameter fitted to the target result. The new longitudinal velocity vL is defined by the principal-value integral in Eq. (37) and follows algebraically from the commutator identity [V,r]=0 (Eq. 33) and the solution for the off-diagonal density matrix; it is not defined in terms of the current it is said to produce. The physical interpretation of vL as producing a longitudinal, TRS-preserving current is delegated to Ref. [23], an external citation (Xiao and Niu), so any weakness there is a support/correctness issue, not circularity. The side-jump velocity vsj and coordinate shift δr are checked against prior semiclassical wave-packet results (Refs. [4,22]) as benchmarks, which is legitimate comparison rather than input. Skew-scattering rates at order V3 and V4 are computed by impurity-ensemble averaging and compared with other methods, also a benchmark comparison. The only self-citations, Refs. [26] and [27], are used for the auxiliary property ∫dk' wA=0 (called 'straightforward to see') and for listing omitted higher-order combinations; neither is load-bearing for the central claim. The moderate-temperature approximation replacing (f_m'0 - f_m0)/(ε_m' - ε_m) by ∂f0/∂ε is explicit and is not a fit to the desired answer. Therefore no circular reduction, fitted prediction, or self-citation chain is present; the paper is self-contained against an external derivation target.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The derivation is a re-derivation of semiclassical transport from the Liouville equation with no fitted free parameters. The main assumptions are the nondegenerate band condition, weak-disorder first Born approximation, the moderate-temperature ratio approximation at Eq. (43), and the cited longitudinality of the vL current.

assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption Bands are nondegenerate and separated: energy conservation δ(ε^m_k - ε^{m'}_{k'}) implies m = m'.
    Invoked in Eqs. (16)-(17) and (51) to collapse collision integrals and skew-scattering rates to a single band; fails at band crossings.
  • domain assumption Low-frequency semiclassical regime: ℏω is much smaller than the interband splitting, and real interband transitions are ignored.
    Used throughout Sec. II to drop dS/dt and to keep only virtual interband processes in the density-matrix equations.
  • domain assumption Weak impurity scattering: [U, ρ0] = 0 and first Born approximation with n_i V^2 treated as small.
    Justifies Eqs. (3)-(11) and the perturbative order counting in Table I; strong disorder would invalidate the derivation.
  • domain assumption Impurities are uncorrelated, identical, and uniformly distributed; ensemble averaging restores translational invariance.
    Appendix B; the averaged products UU and UUUU are truncated, and some terms are asserted not to contribute to scattering.
  • domain assumption The single-impurity potential is a local function of position, so [V, r] = 0 and Eq. (33) holds.
    Needed to convert combinations of Berry connections into gradients of V^{mm'}_{kk'} and to define the side-jump position shift.
  • ad hoc to paper Moderate-temperature approximation: (f0^m' - f0^m)/(ε^m' - ε^m) is replaced by ∂f0/∂ε evaluated at the Fermi surface.
    Inserted at Eq. (43) to identify J_{S1} with eE·(vsj+vL) ∂f0/∂ε; the paper acknowledges this deviates at low temperature.
  • ad hoc to paper The current induced by vL is longitudinal and survives time-reversal symmetry, as stated with citation [23].
    This property is load-bearing for the headline claim but is not derived in the paper for general impurity potentials.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quantum kinetic theory of the semiclassical side jump, skew scattering and longitudinal velocity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FQZTOEVC

@misc{pith2026250205544,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quantum kinetic theory of the semiclassical side jump, skew scattering and longitudinal velocity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FQZTOEVC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.05544}
}
read the original abstract

The semiclassical Boltzmann equation is widely used to study transport effects. However, being semiclassical and borrowing heavily from classical mechanics, the formalism calls for verification from the perspective of quantum mechanics. Although previous works discussed the relation between the quantum density matrix and the semiclassical formalism, direct comparison, especially of disorder effects, including side jumps and skew scattering in the two approaches, has not been fully conducted. In this work, we systematically and directly compare the semiclassical Boltzmann equation and its counterpart arising from the density matrix. We find that there is an additional correction to the side-jump velocity, the longitudinal velocity, which is longitudinal in the leading order, and its resultant current does not require time-reversal symmetry breaking. Moreover, we find the semiclassical side-jump collision integral is an approximation of the quantum result at moderate temperatures, and it also contains a correction induced by the longitudinal velocity. We also show that the scattering rate obtained from the density matrix agrees with the semiclassical results. Our work illuminates the quantum roots of the semiclassical Boltzmann equation.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references · 24 canonical work pages

  1. [23]

    Xiao and Q

    C. Xiao and Q. Niu, Semiclassical theory of spin-orbit torques in disordered multiband electron systems, Phys. Rev. B 96, 045428 (2017)

    work page 2017

  2. [1]

    J. M. Ziman, Principles of the Theory of Solids, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1972)

    work page 1972

  3. [2]

    Cohen and W

    E. Cohen and W. Thirring, eds., The Boltzmann Equa- tion: Theory and Applications , Few-Body Systems (Springer-Verlag, Vienna, 1973)

    work page 1973

  4. [3]

    N. W. Ashcroft and N. D. Mermin, Solid state physics (Harcourt, Inc., New York, 1976)

    work page 1976

  5. [4]

    N. A. Sinitsyn, Semiclassical theories of the anomalous hall effect, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 20, 023201 (2008)

    work page 2008

  6. [5]

    Nagaosa, J

    N. Nagaosa, J. Sinova, S. Onoda, A. H. MacDonald, and N. P. Ong, Anomalous hall effect, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1539 (2010)

    2010

  7. [6]

    Xiao, M.-C

    D. Xiao, M.-C. Chang, and Q. Niu, Berry phase effects on electronic properties, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1959 (2010)

    2010

  8. [7]

    G. D. Mahan, Many-Particle Physics (Springer, New York, 2000)

    work page 2000

Show all 36 references
  1. [8]

    N. A. Sinitsyn, A. H. MacDonald, T. Jungwirth, V. K. Dugaev, and J. Sinova, Anomalous hall effect in a two- dimensional dirac band: The link between the kubo- streda formula and the semiclassical boltzmann equation approach, Phys. Rev. B 75, 045315 (2007)

    2007

  2. [9]

    Onoda, N

    S. Onoda, N. Sugimoto, and N. Nagaosa, Theory of non- equilibirum states driven by constant electromagnetic fields: — non-commutative quantum mechanics in the 12 keldysh formalism —, Progress of Theoretical Physics 116, 61 (2006)

    2006

  3. [10]

    E. J. K¨ onig and A. Levchenko, Quantum kinetics of anomalous and nonlinear hall effects in topological semimetals, Annals of Physics 435, 168492 (2021)

    2021

  4. [11]

    Kohn and J

    W. Kohn and J. M. Luttinger, Quantum theory of elec- trical transport phenomena, Phys. Rev. 108, 590 (1957)

    1957

  5. [12]

    J. M. Luttinger, Theory of the hall effect in ferromagnetic substances, Phys. Rev. 112, 739 (1958)

    1958

  6. [13]

    Culcer, E

    D. Culcer, E. M. Hankiewicz, G. Vignale, and R. Win- kler, Side jumps in the spin hall effect: Construction of the boltzmann collision integral, Phys. Rev. B81, 125332 (2010)

    2010

  7. [14]

    Culcer, A

    D. Culcer, A. Sekine, and A. H. MacDonald, Interband coherence response to electric fields in crystals: Berry- phase contributions and disorder effects, Phys. Rev. B 96, 035106 (2017)

    2017

  8. [15]

    Sekine, D

    A. Sekine, D. Culcer, and A. H. MacDonald, Quantum kinetic theory of the chiral anomaly, Phys. Rev. B 96, 235134 (2017)

    2017

  9. [16]

    C. Xiao, J. Zhu, and B. Xiong, Boltzmann transport from density matrix theory: interband and intraband coher- ences, arXiv:1811.06204

    arXiv

  10. [17]

    R. B. Atencia, Q. Niu, and D. Culcer, Semiclassical re- sponse of disordered conductors: Extrinsic carrier veloc- ity and spin and field-corrected collision integral, Phys. Rev. Research 4, 013001 (2022)

    2022

  11. [18]

    J. Jia, L. Xiang, Z. Qiao, and J. Wang, Equivalence of semiclassical and response theories for second-order non- linear ac hall effects, Phys. Rev. B 110, 245406 (2024)

    2024

  12. [19]

    E. I. Blount, Formalisms of band theory, in Solid State Physics: Advances in Research and Applications, Solid State Physics, Vol. 13, edited by F. Seitz and D. Turnbull (Academic Press, 1962) pp. 305–373

    1962

  13. [20]

    Karplus and J

    R. Karplus and J. M. Luttinger, Hall effect in ferromag- netics, Phys. Rev. 95, 1154 (1954)

    1954

  14. [21]

    Kohmoto, Topological invariant and the quantiza- tion of the hall conductance, Annals of Physics 160, 343 (1985)

    M. Kohmoto, Topological invariant and the quantiza- tion of the hall conductance, Annals of Physics 160, 343 (1985)

    1985

  15. [22]

    N. A. Sinitsyn, Q. Niu, and A. H. MacDonald, Co- ordinate shift in the semiclassical boltzmann equation and the anomalous hall effect, Phys. Rev. B 73, 075318 (2006)

    2006

  16. [24]

    E. J. K¨ onig, M. Dzero, A. Levchenko, and D. A. Pesin, Gyrotropic hall effect in berry-curved materials, Phys. Rev. B 99, 155404 (2019)

    2019

  17. [25]

    Isobe, S.-Y

    H. Isobe, S.-Y. Xu, and L. Fu, High-frequency rectifi- cation via chiral bloch electrons, Science Advances 6, aay2497 (2020)

    2020

  18. [26]

    D. Ma, A. Arora, G. Vignale, and J. C. W. Song, Anomalous skew-scattering nonlinear hall effect and chi- ral photocurrents in PT -symmetric antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 076601 (2023)

    2023

  19. [27]

    Z.-H. Gong, Z. Z. Du, H.-P. Sun, H.-Z. Lu, and X. C. Xie, Nonlinear transport theory at the order of quantum metric, arXiv:2410.04995

    arXiv

  20. [28]

    Mehraeen, Quantum kinetic theory of quadratic re- sponses, Phys

    M. Mehraeen, Quantum kinetic theory of quadratic re- sponses, Phys. Rev. B 110, 174423 (2024)

    2024

  21. [29]

    Huang, C

    Y.-X. Huang, C. Xiao, S. A. Yang, and X. Li, Scaling law and extrinsic mechanisms for time-reversal-odd second- order nonlinear transport, Phys. Rev. B 111, 155127 (2025)

    2025

  22. [30]

    B. I. Sturman, Collision integral for elastic scattering of electrons and phonons, Soviet Physics Uspekhi 27, 881 (1984)

    1984

  23. [31]

    E. M. Hankiewicz and G. Vignale, Coulomb corrections to the extrinsic spin-hall effect of a two-dimensional elec- tron gas, Phys. Rev. B 73, 115339 (2006)

    2006

  24. [32]

    Datta, Electronic Transport in Mesoscopic Systems (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995)

    S. Datta, Electronic Transport in Mesoscopic Systems (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995)

    1995

  25. [33]

    J. E. Sipe and A. I. Shkrebtii, Second-order optical re- sponse in semiconductors, Phys. Rev. B 61, 5337 (2000)

    2000

  26. [34]

    C. W. Groth, M. Wimmer, A. R. Akhmerov, J. Tworzyd lo, and C. W. J. Beenakker, Theory of the topological anderson insulator, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 196805 (2009)

    2009

  27. [35]

    Callaway, Quantum theory of the solid state(Academic Press, New York, 1974)

    J. Callaway, Quantum theory of the solid state(Academic Press, New York, 1974)

    1974

  28. [36]

    Doniach and E

    S. Doniach and E. H. Sondheimer, Green ’s functions for solid state physicists(World Scientific, Singapore, 1998). 13 Appendices A. The position operator and the related commutator In this appendix, we derive the commutator of the position operatorˆr and an operator ˆO in the ...

    1998

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.