REVIEW 3 cited by
Towards Sustainable NLP: Insights from Benchmarking Inference Energy in Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly recognized for their exceptional generative capabilities and versatility across various tasks. However, the high inference costs associated with these models have not received adequate attention, particularly when compared to the focus on training costs in existing research. In response to this gap, our study conducts a comprehensive benchmarking of LLM inference energy across a wide range of NLP tasks, where we analyze the impact of different models, tasks, prompts, and system-related factors on inference energy. Specifically, our experiments reveal several interesting insights, including strong correlation of inference energy with output token length and response time. Also, we find that quantization and optimal batch sizes, along with targeted prompt phrases, can significantly reduce energy usage. This study is the first to thoroughly benchmark LLM inference across such a diverse range of aspects, providing insights and offering several recommendations for improving energy efficiency in model deployment.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Brevity is the soul of sustainability: Characterizing LLM response lengths
LLMs produce longer-than-needed answers to factual questions, and simple prompt instructions such as 'provide only the minimal answer' cut response length and inference energy by about 25-60% without hurting automated...
-
SLM-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark of Small Language Models on Environmental Impacts--Extended Version
A new benchmark of 15 small language models across 23 datasets and 11 metrics shows clear accuracy-versus-energy trade-offs, with no single model dominating.
-
A Multi-Pass Large Language Model Framework for Precise and Efficient Radiology Report Error Detection
A three-pass LLM framework (extractor, detector, false-positive verifier) more than doubled PPV and halved estimated review costs for radiology report error detection, while the absolute number of confirmed errors sta...
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.