Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 44 references

A Comprehensive Survey on Image Signal Processing Approaches for Low-Illumination Image Enhancement

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This survey sorts low-illumination image enhancement into three method families: traditional, learning-based, and hybrid.

desk verdict A well-meaning compilation of NTIRE pipeline summaries that fails the 'comprehensive' claim in its title; desk-reject as a survey, though the individual method descriptions are mostly accurate. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.05995 v1 pith:GXN75DZO submitted 2025-02-09 cs.CV

Muhammad Turab This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CV
keywords low-illuminationimageenhancementsignalprocessingsurveydeeplearningtraditionalmethodshybriddenoisingwhitebalance
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper sets out to provide a comprehensive survey of image signal processing (ISP) methods for enhancing images captured in low light. The author's central claim is that these methods fall into three families: traditional approaches that adjust brightness, contrast, and noise; learning-based approaches that use convolutional neural networks to map low-light inputs to improved images; and hybrid approaches that combine both. The paper also lists datasets commonly used in the field and identifies open research problems such as noise-detail tradeoffs, extreme conditions, real-time processing, and dataset diversity. If the survey is right, a newcomer can use it as an orientation guide to the main approaches and their tradeoffs.

What carries the argument

The organizing object of the survey is the camera image signal processing pipeline—the sequence of demosaicing, white balance, color correction, tone mapping, and denoising that turns raw sensor data into a displayable image. The paper uses this pipeline as the backbone for its taxonomy: traditional methods operate on individual pipeline stages with hand-crafted operators, learning-based methods replace stages or the whole pipeline with neural networks, and hybrid methods keep traditional front-end processing while adding learned tone mapping or enhancement. The taxonomy is what carries the argument that the field can be understood as variations on a common pipeline.

What would settle it

Counting all peer-reviewed low-light image enhancement methods in a standard bibliographic database and comparing the result with the number described here would settle whether the survey is comprehensive; if entire families such as diffusion-based or generative-adversarial methods are absent, the paper's central claim fails. An absence of any quantitative benchmark table in the survey also leaves the claim that learning-based methods dominate untestable as presented.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The core discovery of this review is a three-way taxonomy of low-illumination image enhancement. Traditional methods, illustrated by two-stage pipelines and low-light rendering with separate noise suppression, are computationally cheap but struggle with complex scenes and color casts. Learning-based methods, demonstrated through cascaded frameworks, specialized ISP pipelines, transformer-based denoisers, and generative models, currently lead the field because they can suppress noise while preserving detail, at the cost of large training datasets and compute. Hybrid approaches stitch traditional ISP stages together with learned tone mapping or enhancement networks and are presented as a promising middle ground. The paper further compiles a set of public datasets (color-checker images, multi-camera color constancy sets, and paired RAW/sRGB low-light data) and a list of open challenges.

Load-bearing premise

The survey's value as a map depends on the roughly ten methods it describes being representative of the whole low-illumination enhancement literature, but the paper does not state a search protocol or inclusion criteria, so the sample may not span the field.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A beginner can use the three-family taxonomy to decide which class of methods to study first: traditional for quick baselines, learning-based for state-of-the-art quality, hybrid for a balance.
  • The paper's reading implies that deep learning will continue to dominate low-light enhancement, with the main bottlenecks being training data volume and inference speed.
  • The listed open problems—noise-detail balance, extreme dynamic range, real-time processing, and dataset diversity—define concrete research targets for the field.
  • Hybrid methods, which combine cheap classical preprocessing with learned tone mapping, are presented as a practical route to production systems.
  • The datasets reviewed provide starting points for training and benchmarking, though the paper notes that broader and more diverse collections are still needed.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The methods described appear to be drawn mainly from one recent challenge rather than from a systematic literature search; a reader should not assume that omitted methods are less significant.
  • A quantitative comparison table would be needed to actually verify the claimed tradeoffs between speed, quality, and data requirements; the survey does not provide one.
  • The ISP-pipeline framing suggests that low-light enhancement is best decomposed into subproblems (denoising, white balance, tone mapping), a view that could be tested by measuring whether modular systems outperform end-to-end models on out-of-distribution scenes.
  • One testable extension is to apply the same taxonomy to a broader corpus of published methods and check whether the three families indeed cluster by computational cost and performance.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This manuscript presents itself as a comprehensive survey of low-illumination image enhancement. It organizes the field into traditional, learning-based, and hybrid approaches; describes roughly ten methods, mostly from NTIRE challenge entries; lists four color-constancy datasets; discusses open problems; and concludes with qualitative trade-offs. The paper contains no experiments, benchmarks, or quantitative comparisons, and its selection of methods and datasets is not justified by any stated search or inclusion protocol.

Significance. If the promised comprehensiveness were delivered, the survey would be a useful orientation guide for newcomers, and the proposed three-way taxonomy is reasonable. The individual method summaries are mostly faithful to the cited challenge papers, and the practice of attaching a limitations paragraph to each method is helpful. However, the main value of a survey—reliable coverage and representativeness—is not achieved: the method set is narrow and NTIRE-centric, the datasets are not low-light enhancement datasets, and no comparative basis is provided. The strengths are local; the central promise is not.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and Sections I-IV] The title and abstract promise an 'extensive summary' and a 'comprehensive' review, and Section I states that the paper serves as a practical guide for beginners. The body does not support this: Sections II-IV describe roughly ten methods, all drawn from NTIRE challenge reports, with no search protocol, inclusion criteria, or completeness guarantee. Widely cited branches of the field—retinex-based deep models, GAN-based enhancement such as EnlightenGAN, zero-reference methods such as Zero-DCE, and illumination-map approaches—are absent from the body even though the introduction mentions retinex, histogram equalization, and gray-level transformations as traditional approaches. This representativeness gap is load-bearing because the paper's stated contribution is to 'review and categorize low-illumination image enhancement approaches.'
  2. [Section V and Contribution 3] Section V, 'Datasets,' covers only color-constancy datasets (ColorChecker, NUS 8-Camera, Cube+, INTEL-TAU) and contains no standard low-illumination enhancement dataset such as LOL or SID. This directly contradicts contribution 3, which promises 'an overview of various datasets for low-illumination image enhancement and related tasks,' and it is internally inconsistent with the body: SID is used in the method descriptions of Sections III.C and IV.B but never appears in the dataset section.
  3. [Sections II-VII] The survey lacks any quantitative comparison or evaluation framework: there are no benchmark tables, metric definitions, or reproducible results, and the 'advantages and limitations' statements are qualitative assertions without supporting evidence. Because contribution 2 is explicitly to discuss limitations of each approach, the absence of any comparative evaluation leaves the reader unable to judge the claimed trade-offs among traditional, learning-based, and hybrid methods.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section IV.B] The text says 'the pre-trained SID model [14]', but reference [14] is Gehler et al.'s color constancy paper; the SID paper is reference [8] (Chen et al., Learning to See in the Dark).
  2. [Section III.B] 'Quai-WB' appears to be a typo for 'Quasi-WB' (the method of reference [5]).
  3. [Section III heading and Figure 1] 'LEARNING-BASED APPRAOCHES' contains a typo ('APPRAOCHES'), and Figure 1's 'Taxanomy' should be 'Taxonomy'.
  4. [Section III.E] The first sentence, 'Ordinance Normalization in Batch The ResNet (BINResNet) model is utilized to improve images,' is garbled and should be rewritten to describe the Batch-Instance Normalization ResNet.
  5. [Section VI] The first bullet contains an extra comma after the colon in 'Noise Reduction and Detail retention: , In low-illumination...' and should be corrected.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the survey contains no derivations, fitted parameters, or self-referential argument chains, so its claims about external methods are not definitionally tied to its own inputs.

full rationale

This paper is a literature survey with no equations, no fitted parameters, and no derived predictions. Its claims are summaries of external works (NTIRE challenge methods, color-constancy datasets, ISP components) and therefore cannot reduce to their own inputs by construction. No self-citations by the author appear, let alone load-bearing ones. The weaknesses identified by the skeptic are about scope and representativeness: the word 'comprehensive' is not supported by a search protocol or systematic coverage, and some cited references are mismatched (e.g., Section IV.B calling [14] the 'pre-trained SID model' when [14] is Gehler et al.'s color constancy paper). These are correctness, completeness, and citation-accuracy issues, not circularity. Per the hard rules, absence of an equation-level or self-citation reduction means the honest finding is no significant circularity, so the score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters or invented entities appear because the paper builds nothing new; it has no equations, simulated data, or proposed components. The review instead depends on two unstated premises: that the chosen challenge methods fairly represent the field, and that the prose descriptions faithfully mirror the cited papers. The second premise is already strained by the mis-citation of the SID model in Section IV.B.

assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption The methods selected for review are representative of the field of low-illumination image enhancement.
    The paper never specifies a literature search or inclusion criteria; Sections II-IV cover about ten NTIRE challenge pipelines and use that selection to support the "comprehensive survey" claim in the abstract and Section I.
  • domain assumption The qualitative descriptions of each pipeline accurately reflect the cited source papers.
    The review does not provide code, experiments, or tables to verify its descriptions, and the citation error in Section IV.B, where the SID model is attributed to reference [14] instead of Chen et al. [8], shows this assumption is fragile.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Comprehensive Survey on Image Signal Processing Approaches for Low-Illumination Image Enhancement." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GXN75DZO

@misc{pith2026250205995,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Comprehensive Survey on Image Signal Processing Approaches for Low-Illumination Image Enhancement},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GXN75DZO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.05995}
}
read the original abstract

The usage of digital content (photos and videos) in a variety of applications has increased due to the popularity of multimedia devices. These uses include advertising campaigns, educational resources, and social networking platforms. There is an increasing need for high-quality graphic information as people become more visually focused. However, captured images frequently have poor visibility and a high amount of noise due to the limitations of image-capturing devices and lighting conditions. Improving the visual quality of images taken in low illumination is the aim of low-illumination image enhancement. This problem is addressed by traditional image enhancement techniques, which alter noise, brightness, and contrast. Deep learning-based methods, however, have dominated recently made advances in this area. These methods have effectively reduced noise while preserving important information, showing promising results in the improvement of low-illumination images. An extensive summary of image signal processing methods for enhancing low-illumination images is provided in this paper. Three categories are classified in the review for approaches: hybrid techniques, deep learning-based methods, and traditional approaches. Conventional techniques include denoising, automated white balancing, and noise reduction. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are used in deep learningbased techniques to recognize and extract characteristics from low-light images. To get better results, hybrid approaches combine deep learning-based methodologies with more conventional methods. The review also discusses the advantages and limitations of each approach and provides insights into future research directions in this field.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.05995 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Taxanomy of the Low-Illumination image enhancement approaches. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages

  1. [14]

    Bayesian color constancy revisited

    Peter Vincent Gehler, Carsten Rother, Andrew Blake, Tom Minka, and Toby Sharp. Bayesian color constancy revisited. In 2008 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 1–8, 2008

    work page 2008

  2. [8]

    Learning to see in the dark, 2018

    Chen Chen, Qifeng Chen, Jia Xu, and Vladlen Koltun. Learning to see in the dark, 2018

    work page 2018

  3. [1]

    Abdelrahman Abdelhamed, Mahmoud Afifi, Radu Timofte, Michael S. Brown, Yue Cao, Zhilu Zhang, Wangmeng Zuo, Xiaoling Zhang, Jiye Liu, Wendong Chen, Changyuan Wen, Meng Liu, Shuailin Lv, Yunchao Zhang, Zhihong Pan, Baopu Li, Teng Xi, Yanwen Fan, Xiyu Yu, Gang Zhang, Jingtuo Liu, Junyu Han, Errui Ding, Songhyun Yu, Bumjun Park, Jechang Jeong, Shuai Liu, Ziya...

    work page 2020

  4. [2]

    Brubaker, and Michael S

    Mahmoud Afifi, Marcus A. Brubaker, and Michael S. Brown. Auto white-balance correction for mixed-illuminant scenes, 2021

    work page 2021

  5. [3]

    Flash and storm: Fast and highly practical tone mapping based on naka-rushton equation

    Nikola Banic and Sven Loncaric. Flash and storm: Fast and highly practical tone mapping based on naka-rushton equation. In VISIGRAPP (4: VISAPP) , pages 47–53, 2018

    work page 2018

  6. [4]

    Unsupervised learning for color constancy, 2019

    Nikola Bani ´c, Karlo Ko ˇsˇcevi´c, and Sven Lon ˇcari´c. Unsupervised learning for color constancy, 2019

    work page 2019

  7. [5]

    Quasi-unsupervised color constancy

    Simone Bianco and Claudio Cusano. Quasi-unsupervised color constancy. In 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 12204–12213, 2019

    work page 2019

  8. [6]

    Karen M. Braun. Memory color enhancement algorithm. 2006

    work page 2006

Show all 44 references
  1. [7]

    A spatial processor model for object colour perception

    Gershon Buchsbaum. A spatial processor model for object colour perception. Journal of The Franklin Institute-engineering and Applied Mathematics , 310:1–26, 1980

    1980

  2. [9]

    Prasad, and Michael S

    Dongliang Cheng, D. Prasad, and Michael S. Brown. Illuminant estimation for color constancy: why spatial-domain methods work and the role of the color distribution. Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision , 31 5:1049–58, 2014

    2014

  3. [10]

    Learning enriched illuminants for cross and single sensor color constancy, 2022

    Xiaodong Cun, Zhendong Wang, Chi-Man Pun, Jianzhuang Liu, Wengang Zhou, Xu Jia, and Houqiang Li. Learning enriched illuminants for cross and single sensor color constancy, 2022

    2022

  4. [11]

    Image denoising by sparse 3-d transform-domain collaborative filtering

    Kostadin Dabov, Alessandro Foi, Vladimir Katkovnik, and Karen Egiazarian. Image denoising by sparse 3-d transform-domain collaborative filtering. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing , 16(8):2080–2095, 2007

    2007

  5. [12]

    Illumination estimation challenge: experience of past two years, 2020

    Egor Ershov, Alex Savchik, Ilya Semenkov, Nikola Bani ´c, Karlo Koscevi ´c, Marko Suba ˇsi´c, Alexander Belokopytov, Zhihao Li, Arseniy Terekhin, Daria Senshina, Artem Nikonorov, Yanlin Qian, Marco Buzzelli, Riccardo Riva, Simone Bianco, Raimondo Schettini, Sven Lon ˇcari´c, a...

    2020

  6. [13]

    The cube++ illumination estimation dataset

    Egor Ershov, Alexey Savchik, Illya Semenkov, Nikola Bani ´c, Alexander Belokopytov, Daria Senshina, Karlo Koˇsˇcevi´c, Marko Subaˇsi´c, and Sven Lonˇcari´c. The cube++ illumination estimation dataset. IEEE access , 8:227511–227527, 2020

    2020

  7. [15]

    Barron, Samuel W

    Micha ¨el Gharbi, Jiawen Chen, Jonathan T. Barron, Samuel W. Hasinoff, and Fr ´edo Durand. Deep bilateral learning for real-time image enhancement. volume 36, pages 1 – 12, 2017

    2017

  8. [16]

    Deep residual learning for image recognition, 2015

    Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, and Jian Sun. Deep residual learning for image recognition, 2015

    2015

  9. [17]

    Rehabilitating the colorchecker dataset for illuminant estimation

    Ghalia Hemrit, Graham D Finlayson, Arjan Gijsenij, Peter Gehler, Simone Bianco, Brian Funt, Mark Drew, and Lilong Shi. Rehabilitating the colorchecker dataset for illuminant estimation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.12262 , 2018

    2018 arXiv

  10. [18]

    A comprehensive survey of deep learning for image captioning

    MD Zakir Hossain, Ferdous Sohel, Mohd Fairuz Shiratuddin, and Hamid Laga. A comprehensive survey of deep learning for image captioning. ACM Computing Surveys (CsUR) , 51(6):1–36, 2019

    2019

  11. [19]

    Aim 2020 challenge on learned image signal processing pipeline, 2020

    Andrey Ignatov, Radu Timofte, Zhilu Zhang, Ming Liu, Haolin Wang, Wangmeng Zuo, Jiawei Zhang, Ruimao Zhang, Zhanglin Peng, Sijie Ren, Linhui Dai, Xiaohong Liu, Chengqi Li, Jun Chen, Yuichi Ito, Bhavya Vasudeva, Puneesh Deora, Umapada Pal, Zhenyu Guo, Yu Zhu, Tian Liang, Chengh...

    2020

  12. [20]

    Batch normalization: Accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift, 2015

    Sergey Ioffe and Christian Szegedy. Batch normalization: Accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift, 2015

    2015

  13. [21]

    Nighttime image enhancement based on image decomposition

    Xuesong Jiang, Hongxun Yao, and Dilin Liu. Nighttime image enhancement based on image decomposition. Signal, Image and Video Processing , 13:189–197, 2019

    2019

  14. [22]

    A software platform for manipulating the camera imaging pipeline

    Hakki Can Karaimer and Michael S Brown. A software platform for manipulating the camera imaging pipeline. In Computer Vision–ECCV 2016: 14th European Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, October 11–14, 2016, Proceedings, Part I 14 , pages 429–444. Springer, 2016

    2016

  15. [23]

    A review on image enhancement with deep learning approach

    Amanjot Kaur et al. A review on image enhancement with deep learning approach. ACCENTS Transactions on Image Processing and Computer Vision , 4(11):16, 2018

    2018

  16. [24]

    Restoring extremely dark images in real time

    Mohit Lamba and Kaushik Mitra. Restoring extremely dark images in real time. In 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , pages 3486–3496, 2021

    2021

  17. [25]

    Robust white balance estimation using joint attention and angular loss optimization

    Zhihao Li and Zhan Ma. Robust white balance estimation using joint attention and angular loss optimization. In Thirteenth International Conference on Machine Vision , volume 11605, page 116051E. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2021

    2021

  18. [26]

    A comprehensive survey on data-efficient gans in image generation

    Ziqiang Li, Beihao Xia, Jing Zhang, Chaoyue Wang, and Bin Li. A comprehensive survey on data-efficient gans in image generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.08329, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Swinir: Image restoration using swin transformer, 2021

    Jingyun Liang, Jiezhang Cao, Guolei Sun, Kai Zhang, Luc Van Gool, and Radu Timofte. Swinir: Image restoration using swin transformer, 2021

    2021

  20. [28]

    Swin transformer: Hierarchical vision transformer using shifted windows, 2021

    Ze Liu, Yutong Lin, Yue Cao, Han Hu, Yixuan Wei, Zheng Zhang, Stephen Lin, and Baining Guo. Swin transformer: Hierarchical vision transformer using shifted windows, 2021

    2021

  21. [29]

    A convnet for the 2020s, 2022

    Zhuang Liu, Hanzi Mao, Chao-Yuan Wu, Christoph Feichtenhofer, Trevor Darrell, and Saining Xie. A convnet for the 2020s, 2022

    2022

  22. [30]

    Demosaicing with directional filtering and a posteriori decision

    Daniele Menon, Stefano Andriani, and Giancarlo Calvagno. Demosaicing with directional filtering and a posteriori decision. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 16:132–141, 2007

    2007

  23. [31]

    On finding gray pixels, 2019

    Yanlin Qian, Joni-Kristian K ¨am¨ar¨ainen, Jarno Nikkanen, and Jiri Matas. On finding gray pixels, 2019

    2019

  24. [32]

    U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation, 2015

    Olaf Ronneberger, Philipp Fischer, and Thomas Brox. U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation, 2015

    2015

  25. [33]

    Ntire 2023 challenge on night photography rendering

    Alina Shutova, Egor Ershov, Georgy Perevozchikov, Ivan Ermakov, Nikola Bani ´c, Radu Timofte, Richard Collins, Maria Efimova, Arseniy Terekhin, Simone Zini, et al. Ntire 2023 challenge on night photography rendering. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision...

    2023

  26. [34]

    A survey of deep learning-based low-light image enhancement

    Zhen Tian, Peixin Qu, Jielin Li, Yukun Sun, Guohou Li, Zheng Liang, and Weidong Zhang. A survey of deep learning-based low-light image enhancement. Sensors, 23(18):7763, 2023

    2023

  27. [35]

    Tomasi and R

    C. Tomasi and R. Manduchi. Bilateral filtering for gray and color images. In Sixth International Conference on Computer Vision (IEEE Cat. No.98CH36271), pages 839–846, 1998

    1998

  28. [36]

    Instance normalization: The missing ingredient for fast stylization, 2017

    Dmitry Ulyanov, Andrea Vedaldi, and Victor Lempitsky. Instance normalization: The missing ingredient for fast stylization, 2017

    2017

  29. [37]

    Unpaired learning for high dynamic range image tone mapping, 2021

    Yael Vinker, Inbar Huberman-Spiegelglas, and Raanan Fattal. Unpaired learning for high dynamic range image tone mapping, 2021

    2021

  30. [38]

    An experiment-based review of low-light image enhancement methods

    Wencheng Wang, Xiaojin Wu, Xiaohui Yuan, and Zairui Gao. An experiment-based review of low-light image enhancement methods. Ieee Access , 8:87884–87917, 2020

    2020

  31. [39]

    A trilateral weighted sparse coding scheme for real-world image denoising, 2018

    Jun Xu, Lei Zhang, and David Zhang. A trilateral weighted sparse coding scheme for real-world image denoising, 2018

    2018

  32. [40]

    A bio-inspired multi-exposure fusion framework for low-light image enhancement, 2017

    Zhenqiang Ying, Ge Li, and Wen Gao. A bio-inspired multi-exposure fusion framework for low-light image enhancement, 2017

    2017

  33. [41]

    Restormer: Efficient transformer for high-resolution image restoration, 2022

    Syed Waqas Zamir, Aditya Arora, Salman Khan, Munawar Hayat, Fahad Shahbaz Khan, and Ming-Hsuan Yang. Restormer: Efficient transformer for high-resolution image restoration, 2022

    2022

  34. [42]

    Unsupervised low-light image enhancement via histogram equalization prior

    Feng Zhang, Yuanjie Shao, Yishi Sun, Kai Zhu, Changxin Gao, and Nong Sang. Unsupervised low-light image enhancement via histogram equalization prior. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.01766 , 2021

    2021 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Shallow camera pipeline for night photography rendering, 2022

    Simone Zini, Claudio Rota, Marco Buzzelli, Simone Bianco, and Raimondo Schettini. Shallow camera pipeline for night photography rendering, 2022. 9

    2022

  36. [44]

    Back to the future: a night photography rendering isp without deep learning

    Simone Zini, Claudio Rota, Marco Buzzelli, Simone Bianco, and Raimondo Schettini. Back to the future: a night photography rendering isp without deep learning. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 1465–1473, 2023

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.