Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Observation of a $Pbca$ phase and robust metallicity in $\rm{RuO_2}$ under pressure

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that the high-pressure phase of RuO2 is an orthorhombic Pbca structure, not the widely assumed cubic Pa-3 phase, and that RuO2 remains metallic to at least 120 GPa.

desk verdict New XRD and transport data suggest RuO2's high-pressure phase is Pbca, not Pa-3, and that it stays metallic to 120 GPa; the structural claim needs a quantitative fit comparison before it will convince. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.06228 v1 pith:OWIEFFDY submitted 2025-02-10 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

He Zhang , Xudong Wei , Wei Zhong , Xiaoli Ma , Liyunxiao Wu , Jie Zhou , Saori Kawaguchi , Hirokazu Kadobayashi
show 6 more authors
Zhenxiang Cheng Guoying Gao Xiaohui Yu Ho-kwang Mao Binbin Yue Fang Hong
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords RuO2high-pressurephasetransitionPbcaPa-3rutile-typemetaldioxidemetallicityunderpressuresynchrotronX-raydiffractiondensityfunctionaltheory
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Through synchrotron X-ray diffraction, electrical transport, and density-functional-theory calculations, this paper claims that the long-accepted high-pressure phase sequence of RuO2 is wrong in a specific way: after the rutile-to-CaCl2 transition near 11.5 GPa, the material enters an orthorhombic Pbca phase, a distorted fluorite structure with a larger cell, rather than the cubic Pa-3 phase assigned in previous work. The evidence hinges on a weak low-angle diffraction peak that earlier studies dismissed as an impurity or artifact. On transport, single-crystal measurements show metallic conduction persisting to at least about 120 GPa, with the previously reported loss of metallicity attributed to grain-boundary scattering and nonhydrostatic conditions in powders. If correct, this settles a three-decade structural debate and redirects phase-transition studies of rutile-type metal dioxides.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the weak low-angle Bragg peak, marked by a dashed line in Figure 2b, that persists from about 15.5 GPa to about 120 GPa and shifts with pressure; the paper treats it as an intrinsic reflection of a Pbca-type structure, a symmetry-lowered variant of Pa-3, rather than a leftover CaCl2 line or an experimental artifact. The Pbca phase itself, an orthorhombic distorted fluorite-type structure with two unequal nearest Ru-Ru distances and a much larger cell than Pa-3, carries the structural argument, while single-crystal four-probe resistance and infrared reflectance carry the metallicity argument.

What would settle it

A clean, hydrostatic, high-resolution X-ray diffraction experiment on a RuO2 single crystal between 15 and 40 GPa should either reproduce the pressure-shifting low-angle peak with an indexing consistent with the proposed Pbca cell, for example a near 9.58 Å at 42 GPa, or fail to do so; absence of the peak in a phase-pure crystal would refute the Pbca assignment.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that high-pressure RuO2 follows rutile (P42/mnm) → CaCl2-type (Pnnm) → Pbca rather than rutile → CaCl2-type → Pa-3. The Pbca phase appears almost immediately after the 11.5 GPa second-order transition, coexists with the CaCl2-type phase between 15.5 and 35.0 GPa, and becomes the sole phase above 35 GPa, with a volume collapse marking a first-order transition. Structurally, Pbca is a distorted fluorite arrangement in which the two nearest Ru-Ru bond distances are slightly unequal, unlike Pa-3 where they are equal; the distortion produces a larger orthorhombic cell and an extra low-angle diffraction peak that had previously been overlooked. The paper further claims that RuO2 remains metallic up to at least about 120 GPa, with reduced conductivity at high pressure tied to a declining density of states at the Fermi level, and that phonon calculations show the Pbca phase is dynamically stable up to at least 200 GPa.

Load-bearing premise

The weak low-angle peak is assumed to be an intrinsic Pbca Bragg reflection from the sample; if it is instead an impurity, residual CaCl2-type material, or an experimental artifact, the structural distinction from Pa-3 collapses.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Pressure protocols that stop in the 15-35 GPa window will see mixed CaCl2/Pbca patterns; phase-pure behavior requires going above about 35 GPa.
  • The accepted Pa-3-based equations of state and the associated superhard-phase scenarios need to be re-derived from the Pbca cell.
  • The previously reported loss of metallicity above 28 GPa in powder samples is not an intrinsic electronic transition; intrinsic RuO2 stays metallic to at least 120 GPa.
  • The decrease in density of states above about 80 GPa implies rising resistivity with pressure, but still no insulating state, in the Pbca phase.
  • Because the Pbca phase is dynamically stable up to 200 GPa, RuO2 remains a candidate for transport and spintronic studies well beyond the megabar range.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: if the Pbca phase is the true high-pressure structure, prior studies of other rutile-type dioxides that refined only Pa-3 models may have missed the same weak low-angle reflection; re-examining those datasets for a similar extra peak is a cheap test.
  • Editorial inference: because Pbca lowers the crystal symmetry relative to Pa-3, the magnetic and altermagnetic properties of RuO2, which depend on sublattice and time-reversal symmetries, may shift with pressure in ways the paper does not address.
  • Editorial inference: the weakening of the Pbca diagnostic peak at very high pressure suggests a possible further transition toward Pa-3 or fluorite above 120 GPa; tracking that peak to higher pressures would test this extrapolation.
  • Editorial inference: if the metallicity persists to 120 GPa, RuO2 could serve as an internal electrical standard or electrode material in megabar experiments, a practical consequence the paper leaves undeveloped.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This manuscript reports synchrotron X-ray diffraction, electrical transport, and DFT calculations on RuO2 up to ~120 GPa. The authors claim a phase sequence rutile -> CaCl2-type -> Pbca, with Pbca appearing just after 11.5 GPa, coexisting with the CaCl2-type phase between 15.5 and 35 GPa, and becoming the sole phase above 35 GPa. This assignment contradicts the widely accepted Pa-3 high-pressure phase. The paper further argues, from single-crystal and powder resistance measurements plus infrared reflectance, that RuO2 remains metallic to at least ~120 GPa, with a reduced density of states at ultrahigh pressure explaining the increased resistance. The central structural claim rests on one weak low-angle diffraction peak and a visual match to a DFT-relaxed Pbca pattern; the main text provides no quantitative refinement statistics.

Significance. If correct, the Pbca assignment would overturn a three-decade consensus on the high-pressure structure of RuO2 and would have implications for other rutile-type MO2 dioxides. The metallicity result also matters because it contradicts a recent report of pressure-induced loss of metallicity. The manuscript has clear strengths: the phonon calculations show dynamical stability of Pbca at 40 and 200 GPa, the equation of state is presented over a wide pressure range, and the transport data include single-crystal measurements, which are less ambiguous than powder data. However, the structural identification is not yet supported by quantitative XRD analysis, and the enthalpy ordering raises a question the paper does not answer. The significance is high if the evidence is completed, but the current manuscript does not fully establish the central claim.

major comments (3)
  1. [Fig. 2b/e and the section 'In situ high-pressure powder X-ray diffraction'] The Pbca assignment rests on a single weak low-angle peak (dashed line in Fig. 2b) and on a visual match of a DFT-relaxed Pbca pattern to the data at 42 GPa (Fig. 2e). No Rwp, GooF, or difference curves are reported in the main text, and the Supplementary is only cited as showing 'representative XRD refinement patterns' (Fig. S1). This is not sufficient to exclude an impurity line, a residual CaCl2-type crystallite, a gasket/diamond reflection, or pressure-medium contamination; a compressed impurity would also shift with pressure. The authors should report quantitative Rietveld/Pawley fits for Pbca-only, Pa-3-only, and two-phase models at representative pressures, including the magnitude and angular dependence of the residuals and an impurity phase analysis. Without this, all downstream conclusions—the volume collapse in Fig. 2f, the coexistence range, and the comparison with previous Pa-3 reports—are not firmly grounded.
  2. [Fig. 2d and the paragraph 'To identify this phase...'] The enthalpy calculations show that Pbca lies above Pa-3 and Fm-3m above ~30 GPa, yet the paper claims a pure Pbca phase above 35 GPa. This is not internally impossible if Pbca is kinetically stabilized, but the manuscript does not discuss why the lower-enthalpy Pa-3 or Fm-3m phases are not observed. The authors should either provide a kinetic/metastability argument, include free-energy or temperature effects, or reconcile the calculated enthalpy ordering with the experimental phase sequence. As written, the statement that 'the high-pressure phase is found to be a distorted Pa-3 structure' is hard to reconcile with the energy landscape shown in Fig. 2d.
  3. [Fig. 4c and the discussion of metallicity at 120 GPa] At 120.8 GPa, the single-crystal data show that the low-temperature resistance is slightly larger than the high-temperature resistance, and the paper itself calls this 'semimetal' behavior. This is not an unambiguous metallic fingerprint; a small-gap semiconductor or a poor semimetal can produce a similar R(T). The infrared reflectance data are only presented to 57.1 GPa, so the claim of robust metallicity to ~120 GPa rests on the resistance data alone. The authors should quantify the metallicity criterion (e.g., analysis of R(T) in metallic versus activated models, or additional high-pressure optical or Hall data) or qualify the claim for the highest pressures.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Throughout] There are several typographical and grammatical errors, e.g., 'the in-plan and out-of-plane Ru-O bonds', 'the sample behaviors as a semimetal', 'the results is given', and 'more than three order of magnitude of that at 9.2 GPa'. These should be corrected during revision.
  2. [Fig. 1 caption] The caption says the high-pressure phase is 'a distorted Pa-3 structure' with symmetry lowered to Pbca; this wording is potentially confusing because Pbca and Pa-3 are distinct space groups. Please clarify the group-subgroup relation or the sense in which Pbca is a distortion of Pa-3.
  3. [Fig. 2e and Fig. S1] The comparison in Fig. 2e would be much more informative if the experimental and calculated patterns were shown with peak indexing and a difference curve. Also, if Fig. S1 contains refinement statistics, they should be summarized in the main text rather than only cited.
  4. [Paragraph starting 'Whether the powder sample...'] The sentence 'The statement of insulating behavior in powder RuO2 in recent work should be due to the experimental setup, as no pressure medium is used rather than a hard insulating Al2O3 layer [20]' is awkwardly phrased and should be rewritten for clarity.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the Pbca phase assignment is grounded in external XRD data and independent DFT relaxation, and the metallicity claim rests on direct transport and infrared measurements, with no fitted-input-as-prediction or load-bearing self-citation chain.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are the identification of a Pbca high-pressure phase and robust metallicity to ~120 GPa. The phase identification is based on in situ synchrotron XRD data (Fig. 2a-c) and comparison with DFT-relaxed structures (Fig. 2e); the Pbca model is not fitted to the observed extra peak but relaxed independently from first principles, so the match is an independent prediction rather than a fitted input. The paper explicitly reports that Pbca has higher enthalpy than Pa-3 and Fm-3m above ~30 GPa (Fig. 2d), which shows the assignment is not forced by the theory—it is anchored by the diffraction data. The metallicity claim is based on direct four-probe transport measurements on single-crystal and powder samples (Figs. 4-5) and infrared reflectance, not on parameters fitted to the claim; the DFT DOS calculation is an interpretation of the measured resistance trend, not a fitted reproduction. No load-bearing self-citation chain appears: the only overlapping-author citation is the SPring-8 beamline reference [23], which is instrumental, and [32] is an external source for the Pbca/Pa-3 relationship. The admitted weakness—that the low-angle peak could in principle be an impurity—is a correctness and evidence risk, not a circularity, because the peak is not used to define the model; the Pbca structure generates the peak from an independent relaxation. The paper is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are introduced beyond standard DFT inputs. The paper relies on the assumptions that the DFT-PBE structural relaxation accurately describes the Pbca phase, that the observed extra XRD peak is intrinsic, and that the higher-enthalpy Pbca phase is kinetically stabilized. No new entities are invented.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption PBE-GGA DFT captures the relative energetics and phonon stability of RuO2 polymorphs sufficiently well.
    Used for the enthalpy comparisons in Fig. 2d and phonon spectra in Fig. 3a, which underpin the assignment and the kinetic-stability argument.
  • ad hoc to paper The weak low-angle XRD peak is an intrinsic Bragg reflection of a Pbca-type phase.
    This is the key unresolved assumption: the peak is the only distinct signature separating Pbca from Pa-3; no impurity analysis or alternative explanation is provided in the main text.
  • domain assumption The KBr pressure medium preserves quasi-hydrostatic conditions and does not react with RuO2.
    Used to explain why the prior powder experiment found insulating behavior; no chemical analysis of the recovered sample is reported.
  • domain assumption Electron-phonon and correlation effects beyond PBE do not alter the metallic picture.
    The DFT band structure is used to claim metallicity up to 120 GPa, even though transport shows semimetal-like behavior at the highest pressure.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Observation of a $Pbca$ phase and robust metallicity in $\rm{RuO_2}$ under pressure." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OWIEFFDY

@misc{pith2026250206228,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Observation of a $Pbca$ phase and robust metallicity in $\rmRuO_2$ under pressure},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OWIEFFDY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.06228}
}
abstract

$\rm{RuO_2}$ stands as a quintessential rutile-type compound under ambient conditions, with its structural exploration under pressure bearing significant implications for both phase transition investigations and Earth science. Nonetheless, the precise phase transition sequence remains a debate. In this study, we disclose the emergence of the $Pbca$ phase alongside the enduring metallic character of $\rm{RuO_2}$ under megabar pressure. Employing state-of-the-art synchrotron X-ray diffraction, our observations delineate a phase transition trajectory progressing through rutile, $\rm{CaCl_2}$, and ultimately $Pbca$ phases. Notably, the $Pbca$ phase manifests immediately just after the rutile-$\rm{CaCl_2}$ transition, confining a narrow pressure regime for the pure $\rm{CaCl_2}$-type phase. Within the pressure range of 15.5 to 35.0 GPa, a coexistence of the $\rm{CaCl_2}$-type and $Pbca$ phases is observed, transforming to a sole presence of the $Pbca$ phase beyond 35.0 GPa. Electrical transport measurements conducted on both single crystal and powder samples confirm the enduring metallic conductivity of $\rm{RuO_2}$, persisting up to at least $\sim$120 GPa, albeit exhibiting a diminished conductivity at ultrahigh pressures due to a reduction in electronic density of states at the Fermi level. This study furnishes compelling evidence for the presence of the $Pbca$ phase across a broad pressure range, diverging from the previously widely acknowledged $Pa\bar{3}$ phase, thereby offering crucial insights into phase transition phenomena in other metal dioxides and advancing our comprehension of electronic behaviors within 4d and 5d electron systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.06228 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. The possible phase transition sequence of RuO [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. b focuses on line patterns up to 52.2 GPa, with a zoom￾in region highlighting low diffraction angles. A clear struc￾tural phase transition at 11.5 GPa, indicated by the arrow in Fig. 2b, is identified as a second-order transition from rutile (Phase I) to marcasite CaCl2-type phase (Phase II), consis￾tent with prior Raman studies (critical pressure: 11.8 GPa) [31]. Another transition occurs above 15.5 GPa. This trans… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Calculated phonon spectra and electronic behavior for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The electrical transport properties of RuO [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. The electrical transport and optical properties of RuO [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Ferroelastic instability in rutile TiO2 and thermodynamic suppression of the CaCl2-type phase

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2026-07 accept novelty 5.0 of 10

    Rutile TiO2 has a clear ferroelastic path to the CaCl2-type (Pnnm) phase at ~13.5 GPa, but that phase is thermodynamically suppressed by more stable higher-coordination polymorphs.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    C. N. R. Rao, Transition metal oxides, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 40, 291 (1989)

    work page 1989

  2. [2]

    Tokura and N

    Y . Tokura and N. Nagaosa, Orbital physics in transition-metal oxides, Science 288, 462 (2000)

    work page 2000

  3. [3]

    J. B. Goodenough, Perspective on engineering transition-metal oxides, Chem. Mater. 26, 820 (2014)

    work page 2014

  4. [4]

    Mattheiss, Electronic structure of RuO 2, OsO 2, and IrO 2, Phys

    L. Mattheiss, Electronic structure of RuO 2, OsO 2, and IrO 2, Phys. Rev. B 13, 2433 (1976)

    work page 1976

  5. [5]

    Berlijn, P

    T. Berlijn, P. C. Snijders, O. Delaire, H.-D. Zhou, T. A. Maier, H.-B. Cao, S.-X. Chi, M. Matsuda, Y . Wang, and M. R. Koehler, Itinerant antiferromagnetism in RuO 2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 077201 (2017)

    work page 2017

  6. [6]

    Z. Zhu, J. Strempfer, R. Rao, C. Occhialini, J. Pelliciari, Y . Choi, T. Kawaguchi, H. You, J. Mitchell, and Y . Shao-Horn, Anomalous antiferromagnetism in metallic RuO 2 determined by resonant X-ray scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 017202 (2019)

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    Lovesey, D

    S. Lovesey, D. Khalyavin, and G. van der Laan, Magnetic struc- ture of RuO 2 in view of altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. B 108, L121103 (2023)

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    Šejkal, R

    L. Šejkal, R. González-Hernández, T. Jungwirth, and J. Sinova, Crystal time-reversal symmetry breaking and spontaneous Hall effect in collinear antiferromagnets, Sci. Adv. 6, eaaz8809 (2020)

    work page 2020

Show all 36 references
  1. [9]

    Z. Feng, X. Zhou, L. Šejkal, L. Wu, Z. Zhu, H. Guo, R. González-Hernández, X. Wang, H. Yan, P. Qin, X. Zhang, H. Wu, H. Chen, Z. Meng, L. Liu, Z. Xia, J. Sinova, T. Jung- wirth, and Z. Liu, An anomalous Hall effect in altermagnetic ruthenium dioxide, Nat. Electron. 5, 735 (2022)

    2022

  2. [10]

    Tetragonal rutile (P42/mnm)-orthorhombic marcasite/CaCl2 (Pnnm)-cubic fluorite ( Fm ¯3m)

    have been put forth, and experimental evidence of spin- splitter torque has been documented [11, 12]. Moreover, the generation of tilted spin currents from RuO 2 thin films has been achieved [13], hinting at the potential of RuO2 as a novel platform for designing functional sp...

    1993 arXiv

  3. [11]

    González-Hernández, L

    R. González-Hernández, L. Šmejkal, K. Výborný, Y . Yahagi, J. Sinova, T. Jungwirth, and J. Železný, Efficient electrical spin splitter based on nonrelativistic collinear antiferromagnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 127701 (2021)

    2021

  4. [12]

    Karube, T

    S. Karube, T. Tanaka, D. Sugawara, N. Kadoguchi, M. Kohda, and J. Nitta, Observation of spin-splitter torque in collinear an- tiferromagnetic RuO2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 137201 (2022)

    2022

  5. [13]

    H. Bai, L. Han, X. Feng, Y . Zhou, R. Su, Q. Wang, L. Liao, W. Zhu, X. Chen, and F. Pan, Observation of spin splitting torque in a collinear antiferromagnet RuO 2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 197202 (2022)

    2022

  6. [14]

    A. Bose, N. J. Schreiber, R. Jain, D.-F. Shao, H. P. Nair, J. Sun, X. S. Zhang, D. A. Muller, E. Y . Tsymbal, and D. G. Schlom, Tilted spin current generated by the collinear antiferromagnet ruthenium dioxide, Nat. Electron. 5, 267 (2022)

    2022

  7. [15]

    A. A. Bolzan, C. Fong, B. J. Kennedy, and C. J. Howard, Struc- tural studies of rutile-type metal dioxides, Acta Crystallogr., Sect. B: Struct. Sci 53, 373 (1997)

    1997

  8. [16]

    Ahuja, S

    R. Ahuja, S. Rekhi, S. Saxena, and B. Johansson, High-pressure structural phase transitions in RuO 2 and its geophysical impli- cations, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 62, 2035 (2001)

    2001

  9. [17]

    Haines and J

    J. Haines and J. Léger, Phase transitions in ruthenium diox- ide up to 40 GPa: Mechanism for the rutile-to-fluorite phase transformation and a model for the high-pressure behavior of stishovite SiO2, Phys. Rev. B 48, 13344 (1993)

    1993

  10. [18]

    Haines, J

    J. Haines, J. Léger, and O. Schulte, Pa¯3 modified fluorite-type structures in metal dioxides at high pressure, Science 271, 629 7 (1996)

    1996

  11. [19]

    Haines, J

    J. Haines, J. Leger, M. Schmidt, J. Petitet, A. Pereira, J. Da Jor- nada, and S. Hull, Structural characterisation of the Pa¯3-type, high pressure phase of ruthenium dioxide, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 59, 239 (1998)

    1998

  12. [20]

    J. Tse, D. Klug, K. Uehara, Z. Li, J. Haines, and J. Léger, Elastic properties of potential superhard phases of RuO2, Phys. Rev. B 61, 10029 (2000)

    2000

  13. [21]

    White, D

    M. White, D. Schacher, G. A. Smith, D. Smith, C. Park, K. V . Lawler, and A. Salamat, Pressure-induced loss of metallicity in RuO2, Phys. Rev. Mater.8, 013603 (2024)

    2024

  14. [22]

    Mehtougui, D

    N. Mehtougui, D. Rached, R. Khenata, H. Rached, M. Rabah, and S. Bin-Omran, Structural, electronic and mechanical prop- erties of RuO 2 from first-principles calculations, Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 15, 331 (2012)

    2012

  15. [23]

    S. R. Shieh, A. Kubo, T. S. Duffy, V . B. Prakapenka, and G. Shen, High-pressure phases in SnO2 to 117 GPa, Phys. Rev. B 73, 014105 (2006)

    2006

  16. [24]

    Hirao, S

    N. Hirao, S. Kawaguchi, K. Hirose, K. Shimizu, E. Ohtani, and Y . Ohishi, New developments in high-pressure X-ray diffrac- tion beamline for diamond anvil cell at SPring-8, Matter Radiat. Extremes 5 (2020)

    2020

  17. [25]

    Prescher and V

    C. Prescher and V . B. Prakapenka, DIOPTAS: a program for reduction of two-dimensional X-ray diffraction data and data exploration, High Pressure Res. 35, 223 (2015)

    2015

  18. [26]

    Huang, H

    Y . Huang, H. Park, and F. H. Pollak, Growth and characteriza- tion of RuO2 single crystals, Mater. Res. Bull. 17, 1305 (1982)

    1982

  19. [27]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthmuller, Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set, Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169 (1996)

    1996

  20. [28]

    J. P. Perdew, J. A. Chevary, S. H. V osko, K. A. Jackson, M. R. Pederson, D. J. Singh, and C. Fiolhais, Atoms, molecules, solids, and surfaces: Applications of the generalized gradient approximation for exchange and correlation, Phys. Rev. B 46, 6671 (1992)

    1992

  21. [29]

    P. E. Blöchl, Projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953 (1994)

    1994

  22. [30]

    A. Togo, L. Chaput, T. Tadano, and I. Tanaka, Implementation strategies in phonopy and phono3py, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter (2023)

    2023

  23. [31]

    Togo, First-principles phonon calculations with phonopy and phono3py, J

    A. Togo, First-principles phonon calculations with phonopy and phono3py, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 92, 012001 (2023)

    2023

  24. [32]

    Rosenblum, W

    S. Rosenblum, W. Weber, and B. Chamberland, Raman- scattering observation of the rutile-to-CaCl2 phase transition in RuO2, Phys. Rev. B 56, 529 (1997)

    1997

  25. [33]

    Ohtaka, H

    O. Ohtaka, H. Fukui, K. Funakoshi, W. Utsumi, T. Irifune, and T. Kikegawa, Phase relations and EOS of ZrO 2 and HfO2 un- der high-temperature and high-pressure, High Pressure Res.22, 221 (2002)

    2002

  26. [34]

    Q.-G. Mu, D. Nenno, Y .-P. Qi, F.-R. Fan, C. Pei, M. ElGhazali, J. Gooth, C. Felser, P. Narang, and S. Medvedev, Suppression of axionic charge density wave and onset of superconductivity in the chiral Weyl semimetal Ta2Se8I, Phys. Rev. Mater.5, 084201 (2021)

    2021

  27. [35]

    Pavlosiuk, D

    O. Pavlosiuk, D. Kaczorowski, X. Fabreges, A. Gukasov, and P. Wi´sniewski, Antiferromagnetism and superconductivity in the half-Heusler semimetal HoPdBi, Sci. Rep. 6, 18797 (2016)

    2016

  28. [36]

    Hirai, J

    D. Hirai, J. Matsuno, D. Nishio-Hamane, and H. Takagi, Semimetallic transport properties of epitaxially stabilized per- ovskite CaIrO3 films, Appl. Phys. Lett. 107, 012104 (2015)

    2015

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.