Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 major objections 5 minor 8 references

A multiplication formula for cluster characters in gentle algebras

T0 review · 6 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper proves that a generating extension in a gentle algebra splits the quiver Grassmannian of X⊕S into two pieces, yielding a multiplication formula for cluster characters and, for surface algebras, an exchange relation.

desk verdict Genuine generalization with a real proof gap: the main formula is plausible, but the counting argument breaks down in exactly the cases where the auxiliary algebra B is not string. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.06410 v4 pith:JOEH7PT6 submitted 2025-02-10 math.RT math.RA

Azzurra Ciliberti This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.RTmath.RA MSC 16G2013F60
keywords clustercharactergentlealgebraquiverGrassmannianexchangerelationsurfacetriangulationExt-orderF-polynomialstringmodule
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Cluster characters turn modules into Laurent polynomials whose products are meant to mirror cluster variables. For acyclic quivers a generating short exact sequence gives a two-term multiplication formula, but the proof uses heredity. This paper extends the formula to gentle algebras, the class arising from unpunctured surface triangulations, by defining submodules of X and S through the Auslander–Reiten translation and inserting an Ext-minimal extension module M as the second term. The payoff is a two-term product identity for cluster characters that reproduces exchange relations in principal-coefficient cluster algebras and, for symmetric modules, a type-B/type-A comparison.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the cluster character $\mathrm{CC}(L)=\sum_e \chi(\mathrm{Gr}_e(L))x^{Be+g_L}y^e$, built from Euler characteristics of quiver Grassmannians. To obtain a two-term product, the proof cuts a generating extension $0\to X\to Y\to S\to 0$ using the submodules $\underline{X}=\ker(f)$ and $\underline{S}=\mathrm{im}(g)$ defined by the morphism $X\to\tau S$ that does not factor through an injective module and the morphism $\tau^{-1}X\to S$ that does not factor through a projective module. The correction term is the $\leq_{\mathrm{Ext}}$-minimum extension $M$ between $S/\underline{S}$ and $\underline{X}$, where the Ext-order is generated by nonsplit short exact sequences; for surface gentle algebras the extra arrows needed for $M$ already lie in $Q$, so $B=A$. The proof runs on string combinatorics: extensions of string modules are generated by arrow and overlap extensions, and $\chi(\mathrm{Gr}_e(L))$ counts successor-closed subquivers of the string diagram.

What would settle it

Find a gentle algebra A and a generating extension with one-dimensional Ext space for which the constructed B is infinite-dimensional or M has a nonzero self-extension; then the equality $\chi(\mathrm{Gr}^A_e(X\oplus S))=\chi(\mathrm{Gr}^A_e(Y))+\chi(\mathrm{Gr}^B_{e-\dim S}(M))$ would fail for some e, or the exchange-relation upgrade in Theorem 4.0.11 would not follow.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Let $A=kQ/I$ be gentle, let $X,S$ be $A$-modules with $\dim\mathrm{Ext}^1_A(S,X)=1$, and let $\xi:0\to X\to Y\to S\to 0$ be a generating extension. Theorem 4.0.4 asserts that for every dimension vector $e$, $\chi(\mathrm{Gr}^A_e(X\oplus S))=\chi(\mathrm{Gr}^A_e(Y))+\chi(\mathrm{Gr}^B_{e-\dim S}(M))$, where $M$ is the $\leq_{\mathrm{Ext}}$-minimum extension between $S/\underline{S}$ and $\underline{X}$ in a finite-dimensional algebra $B\supseteq A$; when $A$ is the gentle algebra of a triangulation of an unpunctured surface, $B=A$. This recovers the earlier acyclic formula when $A$ is hereditary. The induced cluster-character identity (Corollary 4.0.8) is $\mathrm{CC}(X)\mathrm{CC}(S)=\mathrm{CC}(Y)x^{g_X+g_S-g_Y}+y^{\dim S}\mathrm{CC}(M)x^{B\dim S+g_X+g_S-g_M}$, and Theorem 4.0.11 upgrades it to an exchange relation when $X$ and $S$ are rigid indecomposables and $A$ is the gentle algebra of an unpunctured marked surface. Section 5 applies the formula to orthogonal modules over the symmetric algebra of a reflection-invariant triangulation of a regular polygon, proving the type-B/type-A F-polynomial and g-vector comparison.

Load-bearing premise

The formula's second term assumes that the algebra B built by adding one or two arrows is finite-dimensional and that the minimal extension module M is rigid; the paper only sketches B and asserts rigidity without a proof.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For every gentle algebra and every generating extension, the Euler characteristic of $\mathrm{Gr}_e(X\oplus S)$ is determined by $Y$ and one minimal extension module $M$, giving cluster character multiplication a two-term shape.
  • For unpunctured surface triangulations the correction term is defined inside the same gentle algebra, so the identity is intrinsic and not an artifact of an auxiliary algebra.
  • Specializing $x_i=1$ gives the F-polynomial identity $F_XF_S=F_Y+y^{\dim S}F_M$, a purely combinatorial statement about successor-closed subquivers of string diagrams.
  • For rigid indecomposable modules over surface gentle algebras, the identity is an exchange relation in the cluster algebra with principal coefficients, giving a module-theoretic proof of those exchanges.
  • For reflection-invariant triangulations of polygons, the formula proves the type-B/type-A restriction identities for F-polynomials and g-vectors of all orthogonal indecomposable modules, without a heredity assumption.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same two-term shape may hold for wider classes of string algebras or for Jacobian algebras of punctured surfaces, since the proof only needs a combinatorial basis of extensions and a finite-dimensional ambient algebra; the paper's Remark 4.0.13 already gestures at this.
  • If the auxiliary algebra $B$ is made explicit and proved finite-dimensional, the formula becomes an effective algorithm for computing cluster character products from string data alone.
  • The type-B/type-A application suggests a general categorical reading of restriction: symmetric-module categories over symmetric gentle algebras should categorify restriction maps between cluster algebras, with the Ext-minimal extension encoding the subtraction term in F-polynomial comparisons.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

6 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper claims a multiplication formula for cluster characters (Caldero–Chapoton maps) over gentle algebras. For A-modules X, S with dim Ext^1(S,X)=1 and a generating extension 0→X→Y→S→0, Theorem 4.0.4 asserts χ(Gr_e(X⊕S)) = χ(Gr_e(Y)) + χ(Gr^B_{e-dimS}(M)), where M is an Ext-minimum extension in a finite-dimensional algebra B ⊇ A. The paper then derives a cluster-character multiplication formula (Corollary 4.0.8), shows that B=A for gentle algebras coming from unpunctured surface triangulations, and upgrades the formula to an exchange relation for rigid indecomposable modules (Theorem 4.0.11). Section 5 applies these results to give a representation-theoretic proof of a known type-B/type-A cluster variable formula (Theorem 5.0.14).

Significance. If fully established, the main theorem would generalize the acyclic-quiver result of Cerulli Irelli, Esposito, Franzen, and Reineke to all gentle algebras and would provide a uniform representation-theoretic interpretation of exchange relations in cluster algebras from unpunctured surfaces. The paper is clearly organized, the combinatorial case-by-case analysis in the overlap-extension cases with Ext^1(S,X/X)≠0 is plausible and is supported by several worked examples (Examples 4.0.10, 4.0.12), and the application to type B is natural. However, several load-bearing points in the proof of Theorem 4.0.4 and in the derivation of Theorem 5.0.14 are asserted rather than proved. The significance of the paper depends on completing those arguments.

major comments (6)
  1. [§4, proof of Theorem 4.0.4, Ext^1(S,X/X)=0 cases] The proof invokes Remark 2.0.4 to compute χ(Gr^B_{e-dimS}(M)) as the number of successor-closed subquivers. Remark 2.0.4 is stated for string algebras and string/band modules. In the cases treated under conditions (1) or (2), the algebra B obtained by adjoining a_L or a_R is, as the paper itself concedes in Remark 4.0.6 and Example 4.0.10(iii), not gentle, and in the second construction of Example 4.0.10(iii) it is not even a string algebra (two incoming arrows at vertex 5 compose non-trivially with e, violating condition G2). Therefore Remark 2.0.4 cannot be applied to identify the Euler characteristic with the subquiver count. The proof shows that L/S gives a successor-closed subquiver of M but does not prove that every B-submodule of M arises in this way. Equality (4.1) is thus not established in these cases.
  2. [Theorem 4.0.4 statement and proof] The algebra B = kQ'/I ⊇ A is never completely defined. The proof only says that one adjoins an arrow a_L or a_R to Q and does not specify the ideal I of the quotient kQ'/I, nor does it prove that the resulting algebra is finite-dimensional. Since M is defined as the Ext-minimum extension between S/S and X in B and the term χ(Gr^B_{e-dimS}(M)) is taken in B, the theorem is incomplete without a construction of B and a proof of its finite dimensionality.
  3. [Definition 4.0.1] The definition of X and S depends on the choice of the 'non-zero morphism f: X→τS that does not factor through an injective A-module' (and dually for g). The paper does not prove that such a morphism is unique; if several exist, ker f and im g, and hence the modules X and S, may depend on the choice. The argument in the proof of Theorem 4.0.4 selects the morphism associated with a maximal overlap but does not show that any other non-zero morphism not factoring through an injective would lead to the same submodules. Since X and S appear throughout (4.1), the well-definedness of these submodules is load-bearing.
  4. [Remark 4.0.5] The assertion 'The module M is rigid' is stated without proof. This rigidity is used in the proof of Theorem 4.0.11 to conclude that X ⊕ Y ⊕ M and S ⊕ Y ⊕ M are rigid and hence that (4.2) is an exchange relation via the cluster character bijection. A proof of Ext^1_B(M,M)=0, or a precise reference, is required; without it the exchange-relation theorem is not established.
  5. [§4, proof of Theorem 4.0.4, band module case] The theorem is stated for arbitrary A-modules, but the proof treats only string modules in detail, saying that if one or both are bands 'the argument is the same with minor adaptations.' For band modules the extension theory differs (there are no arrow extensions, only overlap extensions, cf. Theorem 1.1.8 and the subsequent remarks), and band modules are not rigid, so the reduction to the string case is not automatic. A separate argument for bands is needed to support the claimed generality.
  6. [§5, proof of Theorem 5.0.14(ii)] After applying Remark 4.0.9 and Proposition 5.0.1, the proof concludes 'M = L(a,¯b) ⊕ L(ρ(a),ρ(¯b))' from an equality of F-polynomials. F-polynomials do not determine modules in general, and the proof does not invoke or prove a uniqueness property of the Ext-minimum extension in this setting. Since this identification is used to derive (5.9) and (5.10), a missing step needs to be supplied.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Theorem 4.0.4 statement] The notation B = kQ'/I ⊇ A reuses I for the ideal of B, while I is already the ideal of A; this is confusing since the ideal of B is generally different. Please use a different symbol, e.g., I'.
  2. [Example 4.0.10(iii)] In the first construction, the paper states that the resulting B is still gentle, but it does not verify conditions (G1)–(G4) after the addition of the arrow a_L. A short check would make the example more convincing.
  3. [Theorem 5.0.14(i)] The phrase 'Res(N) = (Vi, ϕa) is indecomposable as ordinary module' should read 'as an ¯A-module'; the term 'ordinary module' is vague.
  4. [Definition 1.1.6(2)] The symbols a, b, c, d are sometimes arrows and sometimes the empty set (e.g., 'a = ∅'). This notation is nonstandard and should be clarified, for instance by introducing a convention for absent arrows.
  5. [Proof of Theorem 4.0.4] The sentence 'We show the proof for X, S both string modules' appears after a reduction to indecomposables; if the reduction is only valid for string modules, this should be stated explicitly before the reduction.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circular derivation: Theorem 4.0.4 is a direct combinatorial identity; only a minor non-load-bearing self-citation appears in the type B application.

full rationale

The main derivation chain is self-contained. Theorem 4.0.4 defines X and S via Auslander-Reiten morphisms (Definition 4.0.1), constructs M explicitly from the string data of the generating extension, and proves the Euler-characteristic equality (4.1) by a direct successor-closed-subquiver count using Remark 2.0.4. Corollary 4.0.8 and Theorem 4.0.11 are algebraic consequences of that identity plus standard cluster-character facts; no parameter is fitted and no target quantity is built into an input. The only self-reference is Section 5, where Theorem 5.0.14 is presented as an interpretation/application: its proof invokes the author's earlier Theorem 5.0.3 ([Cil25, Thm 3.7]) - for (i) as a rewriting, and for (ii) after identifying the module M via the new formula and the skein relation. Because [Cil25] is a published, parameter-free statement and the section is explicitly an application rather than independent evidence for Theorem 4.0.4, this is at most a minor non-load-bearing self-citation. The paper's own caveats (Remark 4.0.5 asserting rigidity without proof; Example 4.0.10(iii) admitting B need not be string, undermining the invocation of Remark 2.0.4 in those cases) are proof-gap/correctness concerns, not circularity, and are outside the circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central theorem is built almost entirely on established string-algebra combinatorics and the cluster theory of surfaces; the only part of the construction that is new and not fully proved is the auxiliary algebra B and the Ext-minimum module M. The type B application leans on the author's own earlier theorem, which is consistent but should not be counted as independent confirmation. No numbers are fitted to data.

assumptions (6)
  • standard math String/band classification and overlap description of Hom and Ext for string and gentle algebras (Theorems 1.0.13, 1.1.3, 1.1.8).
    Used to reduce X and S to string data and to identify the unique generating extension; cited from [BR87], [Cra89], and [ÇPS21].
  • standard math Auslander-Reiten formulas and the description τ(M(w)) = M(gr(gl(w))) for string algebras (Theorem 1.1.5, [ASS06] IV.2.13).
    Definition 4.0.1 and the proof of Theorem 4.0.4 rely on these to construct X and S and to identify τS and τ^-1X.
  • standard math χ(Gre(L)) equals the number of successor-closed subquivers for string and band modules (Remark 2.0.4; [Cer11; JS24; Hau12]).
    The Grassmannian counting in Theorem 4.0.4 is converted to subquiver counting; a failure here would invalidate the bijection.
  • standard math Cluster character bijection between rigid objects of the cluster category C(S,M) and cluster monomials (Theorem 4.0.11; [BZ11; ÇS17]).
    Used to conclude that the multiplication formula is an exchange relation rather than just a character identity.
  • domain assumption Type B/type A cluster variable formula of [Cil25, Theorem 3.7].
    Section 5 uses this prior theorem of the author as an input; Theorem 5.0.14 gives the categorical counterpart rather than an independent derivation of the B/A relation.
  • ad hoc to paper Existence of a finite-dimensional algebra B = kQ'/I ⊇ A containing an Ext-minimum extension M between S/S and X, with the Grassmannian term interpreted in B.
    Theorem 4.0.4 postulates B and M; the proof only sketches the added arrows and does not fully specify the ideal I' or prove finite dimensionality. Example 4.0.10(iii) shows B need not be gentle or string.
invented entities (1)
  • Finite-dimensional algebra B = kQ'/I ⊇ A
    purpose: Defines the module M as the Ext-minimum extension between S/S and X; the Grassmannian correction term in Theorem 4.0.4 and the cluster character term y^{dimS}CC(M) live in B.
    The theorem asserts existence of B, but the proof only adds arrows and does not fully specify relations or prove finiteness; in Example 4.0.10(iii) B is not gentle or string. No independent handle outside the construction is provided.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A multiplication formula for cluster characters in gentle algebras." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JOEH7PT6

@misc{pith2026250206410,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A multiplication formula for cluster characters in gentle algebras},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JOEH7PT6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.06410}
}
read the original abstract

We prove a multiplication formula for cluster characters induced by generating extensions in a gentle algebra A, generalizing a result of Cerulli Irelli, Esposito, Franzen, Reineke. In the case where A is the gentle algebra of a triangulation T of an unpunctured marked surface, this provides a representation-theoretic interpretation of the exchange relations in the cluster algebra with principal coefficients in T. As an application, we interpret a formula that relates cluster variables of type B to cluster variables of type A in the symmetric module category of the algebras arising from special triangulations of a regular polygon.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.06410 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. An arrow extension between M(w) and M(v). (iii) If M(w) is not a projective module, assuming without loss of generality that gl(w) ̸= 0, then the Auslander-Reiten sequence ending at M(w) is of the form 0 → M(gr(gl(w))) → M(gl(w)) ⊕ M(gr(w)) → M(w) → 0. In particular, τ(M(w)) = M(gr(gl(w))). From now on, the term ’band module’ will refer to a quasi-simple band module. Definition 1.1.6 ([ÇPS21, Definition 3.1]). Let v… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. An overlap extension between M(w) and M(v) with overlap m. If band modules are involved, there are no arrow extensions, only overlap extensions. For more details, see [ÇPS21, Theorems B-E]. Remark 1.1.10. If A is a non-gentle string algebra and v, w are strings or bands, then overlaps between v and w no longer provide a basis for Ext1 A(M(v), M(w)), as noted in [Zha14, Remark 2.7]. For instance, consider the algebra… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. An overlap extension between X = M(w) and S = M(v) with Ext1 (S, X/X) ̸= 0 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (9 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: An overlap extension between X = M(w) and S = M(v) with Ext1 (S, X/X) = 0 satisfying (1) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: An overlap extension between X = M(w) and S = M(v) with Ext1 (S, X/X) = 0 satisfying (2). 17 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: An overlap extension between X = M(w) and S = M(v) with Ext1 (S, X/X) = 0 satisfying (1) and (2). indecomposable summands of M, therefore M is the Ext-minimum extension between S/S and X. We observe that, in this case, only one between αR and βR can be non-zero. The ca…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: A triangulated octagon with the elementary lamination associated with each diagonal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Two θ-invariant triangulations of P8. Each θ-invariant triangulation T of P2n+2 has exactly one diameter d. After choosing an ori￾entation of d, one can define the cluster algebra AB • (T) of type Bn with principal coefficients in T ([Cil25], Definition 1.3). It turns …
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: On the left, two θ-orbits [a, a¯] and [a, b]. On the right, their restrictions. (i) If Res([a, b]) contains only one diagonal γ (as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: On the left, a θ-orbit [a, b]. On the right, its restriction in red and the diagonal (a, ¯b) in blue. Example 5.0.5. Let Q = 1 a−→ 2 b −→ 3 and Q′ = 1 a−→ 2 b ←− 3 be two quivers of type A3. Then Q is symmetric, with the involution σ given by σ(1) = 3, σ(2) = 2 and σ(…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: An example of cluster for a cluster algebra of type [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: The action of Fd on the θ-orbit [a, b] whose diagonals cross d. and gN = D(gRes(N) + en), (5.10) where M is the ≤Ext-minimum extension in A′ between ∇L/∇L and L. Moreover, M is an orthog￾onal A′ -module. Proof. Since Res(T) = Res(T ′ ), (i) is simply a rewriting of Th…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

8 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages

  1. [49]

    Generalized quivers associated to reductive groups

    ISSN : 0001-8708. DOI: 10.1016/j.aim.2017.03.016 . URL: https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.aim.2017.03.016. [DW02] H. Derksen and J. Weyman. “Generalized quivers associated to reductive groups”. In: Colloq. Math. 94.2 (2002), pp. 151–173. ISSN : 0010-1354. DOI: 10.4064/cm94- 2- 1 . URL: https://doi.org/10.4064/cm94-2-1. 30 [FST08] S. Fomin, M. Shapiro, and D. Thu...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.aim.2017.03.016 2002

  2. [179]

    On the cluster category of a marked surface without punc- tures

    ISSN : 0092-7872. DOI: 10.1080/00927878708823416. URL: https://doi.org/10. 1080/00927878708823416. [BZ11] T. Brüstle and J. Zhang. “On the cluster category of a marked surface without punc- tures”. In: Algebra Number Theory 5.4 (2011), pp. 529–566. ISSN : 1937-0652. DOI: 10 . 2140/ant.2011.5.529. URL: https://doi.org/10.2140/ant.2011.5.529. [Cer+21] G. Ce...

    work page arXiv 2011

  3. [194]

    Quivers with potentials associated to triangulated surfaces

    ISSN : 0021-8693. DOI: 10.1016/0021-8693(91)90088-P . URL: https://doi.org/ 10.1016/0021-8693(91)90088-P. [Lab09] D. Labardini-Fragoso. “Quivers with potentials associated to triangulated surfaces”. In: Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3) 98.3 (2009), pp. 797–839. ISSN : 0024-6115. DOI: 10.1112/ plms/pdn051. URL: https://doi.org/10.1112/plms/pdn051. [MW13] G. Musi...

    arXiv 2009

  4. [229]

    A geometric model for the module category of a gentle algebra

    ISSN : 1937-0652. DOI: 10.2140/ant.2010.4.201 . URL: https://doi.org/10. 2140/ant.2010.4.201. [ASS06] I. Assem, D. Simson, and A. Skowro ´ nski. Elements of the representation theory of associa- tive algebras. Vol. 1. Vol. 65. London Mathematical Society Student Texts. Techniques of representation theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2006, pp. x...

    work page doi:10.2140/ant.2010.4.201 2021

  5. [2080]

    Skein relations for punctured surfaces

    DOI: 10.4310/arkiv.2025.v63.n1.a3. URL: https://doi.org/10.4310/arkiv. 2025.v63.n1.a3. [BKK24a] E. Banaian, W. Kang, and E. Kelley. Skein relations for punctured surfaces . 2024. arXiv: 2409.04957 [math.CO]. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.04957. [BKK24b] E. Banaian, W. Kang, and E. Kelley. “Skein relations for punctured surfaces”. In: Sém. Lothar. Combin...

    arXiv 2024

  6. [7630]

    Maps between tree and band modules

    DOI: 10.1017/nmj.2023.37. URL: https://doi.org/10.1017/nmj.2023.37. [Kra91] H. Krause. “Maps between tree and band modules”. In: J. Algebra 137.1 (1991), pp. 186–

    doi:10.1017/nmj.2023.37 1991

  7. [7928]

    On degenerations and extensions of symplectic and orthogonal quiver representations

    DOI: 10.1093/imrn/rnz150. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/imrn/rnz150. 29 [BC24] K. Baur and R. Coelho Simões. A geometric model for the module category of a string algebra. 2024. arXiv: 2403.07810 [math.RT] . URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2403. 07810. [BC25] M. Boos and G. Cerulli Irelli. “On degenerations and extensions of symplectic and orthogonal quiver rep...

    arXiv 2025

  8. [9266]

    On indecomposable exceptional modules over gentle algebras

    DOI: 10.1090/memo/1343. URL: https://doi.org/10.1090/memo/1343. [Zha14] J. Zhang. “On indecomposable exceptional modules over gentle algebras”. In: Comm. Algebra 42.7 (2014), pp. 3096–3119. ISSN : 0092-7872. DOI: 10.1080/00927872.2013. 781369. URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/00927872.2013.781369. 31

    arXiv 2014

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.