Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 60 references

Pairing phase diagram for electron-doped cuprates in the square-lattice $t-U-V$ Hubbard model

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read In the t-U-V Hubbard model at electron doping δ = 0.153, nearest-neighbor attraction drives p-wave spin-triplet pairing while nearest-neighbor repulsion suppresses d-wave pairing and induces d_xy-wave pairing.

desk verdict Repulsive-V suppression of d-wave looks plausible and worth a look; the p-wave 'phase' is an overreach built from exponentially decaying correlations. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.07079 v2 pith:GHSYSRLR submitted 2025-01-25 cond-mat.supr-con cond-mat.str-el

Zhangkai Cao , Shuning Tan , Ji Liu , Xiaosen Yang , Tao Ying , Ho-Kin Tang , Cho-Tung Yip This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.supr-concond-mat.str-el PACS 74.20.-z74.25.Dw71.10.Fd
keywords t-U-VHubbardmodelelectron-dopedcupratesnearest-neighborinteractiond-wavepairingd_xy-wavep-wavetripletconstrained-pathquantumMonteCarlochargeandspindensitywaves
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to explain why electron-doped cuprates show a much smaller superconducting region than standard Hubbard-model simulations predict. It argues that the missing ingredient is the nearest-neighbor interaction $V$ between electrons, treated alongside the on-site repulsion $U$ in the $t$-$U$-$V$ Hubbard model on a square lattice. Using constrained-path quantum Monte Carlo at doping $\delta = 0.153$, the authors find that attractive $V$ ($V<0$) drives a spin-triplet $p$-wave pairing, whereas repulsive $V$ ($V>0$) suppresses the conventional $d_{x^2-y^2}$-wave pairing and instead strengthens $d_{xy}$-wave pairing. They further report that repulsive $V$ enhances charge-density-wave correlations and suppresses spin-density-wave correlations. If correct, the $t$-$U$-$V$ model would serve as a minimal model for the electron-doped cuprate phase diagram, with repulsive $V$ acting as the factor that shrinks the $d$-wave superconducting dome.

What carries the argument

The carrying object is the $t$-$U$-$V$ Hubbard Hamiltonian: nearest-neighbor hopping $t$ (with next-nearest-neighbor hopping $t'=0.2t$ for electron doping), on-site Coulomb repulsion $U$, and nearest-neighbor density-density interaction $V$ (negative $V$ attractive, positive $V$ repulsive). The diagnostic that carries the phase assignment is the effective pair momentum distribution and its real-space counterpart, which separate the $d$-wave, $d_{xy}$-wave, and spin-triplet $p$-wave pairing channels. The constrained-path quantum Monte Carlo method supplies the ground-state correlations, using a path constraint to partially control the fermion sign problem. The mechanism is a competition between $U$ and $V$: on-site repulsion favors $d$-wave pairing through spin fluctuations, while nearest-neighbor interaction shifts the balance, with attraction favoring triplet $p$-wave pairing and repulsion favoring $d_{xy}$-wave pairing and suppressing $d$-wave pairing.

What would settle it

A calculation with a bias-free or sign-problem-free method at $U=2$, $V=-0.8$, and $\delta=0.153$ - for instance, density-matrix renormalization group on $8\times L$ cylinders - that finds no surviving $p$-wave pairing, or a constrained-path run on $16\times16$ and $24\times24$ lattices whose $p$-wave extrapolation trends to zero, would settle that the claimed $p$-wave phase is not a thermodynamic ground state.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is a zero-temperature pairing phase diagram for the $t$-$U$-$V$ Hubbard model at electron doping $\delta=0.153$, computed with constrained-path quantum Monte Carlo on $12\times12$ lattices with finite-size extrapolation. At $V=0$, $d$-wave pairing dominates and its strength grows with $U$. Once $V$ becomes attractive, even a small $|V|$ drives the system into a spin-triplet $p$-wave phase, especially at weak coupling $U=1$-$2$, where the $p$-wave channel condenses at zero center-of-mass momentum. Once $V$ becomes repulsive, $d$-wave pairing is progressively suppressed, and in the intermediate coupling regime $U=3$-$4$ the system enters a $d_{xy}$-wave pairing phase whose strength increases with $V$. The paper interprets repulsive $V$ as the agent that suppresses $d$-wave pairing in electron-doped cuprates, and estimates that $V/U$ around $1/4$ to $1/3$ would reproduce the observed suppression of superconductivity. The authors also note that the $p$-wave real-space correlations decay exponentially, yet the finite-size extrapolations remain positive and they assign a $p$-wave phase to that region; separately, repulsive $V$ enhances charge-density-wave order and suppresses spin-density-wave order.

Load-bearing premise

The central assumption is that constrained-path quantum Monte Carlo on a $12\times12$ lattice, extrapolated in system size, identifies the true thermodynamic pairing phases; in particular, the short-range $p$-wave correlations are taken as evidence of a genuine $p$-wave phase.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If electron-doped cuprates carry a nearest-neighbor repulsion $V$ with $V/U \approx 1/4$ to $1/3$, the model predicts a strongly suppressed $d$-wave pairing strength, yielding a small superconducting dome and low $T_c$.
  • As electron doping increases beyond the optimal value, the $p$-wave and $d_{xy}$-wave regions expand and further suppress $d$-wave pairing, so the superconducting region stays narrow in the overdoped direction.
  • With an attractive nearest-neighbor interaction of magnitude comparable to the hopping, the square-lattice $t$-$U$-$V$ model becomes a candidate for spin-triplet $p$-wave superconductivity at zero center-of-mass momentum.
  • Repulsive $V$ shifts the density-wave balance: charge-density-wave correlations strengthen and spin-density-wave correlations weaken, giving an experimental handle on $V$ through CDW/SDW competition.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper leaves it implicit, but its $V/U \approx 1/4$ to $1/3$ estimate is a quantitative target that could be checked against ab initio estimates of the effective nearest-neighbor Coulomb repulsion in specific electron-doped cuprate compounds.
  • A natural next test, not performed in the paper, is whether the $p$-wave phase survives in methods without the constrained-path bias, such as density-matrix renormalization group on long cylinders.
  • The phase diagram implies a material-level prediction the paper does not draw: altering the dielectric environment or applying strain to reduce nonlocal Coulomb screening should suppress $d$-wave superconductivity and strengthen $d_{xy}$-wave or charge-order correlations in electron-doped cuprates.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports constrained-path quantum Monte Carlo (CPQMC) ground-state calculations of the square-lattice t-U-V Hubbard model at electron doping δ=0.153 (with additional doping scans), using t'=0.2 to model electron-doped cuprates. The central claims are: (i) attractive nearest-neighbor interaction V drives an exotic p-wave spin-triplet pairing; (ii) repulsive V suppresses d_{x^2-y^2}-wave pairing and promotes d_xy-wave pairing; (iii) repulsive V enhances CDW and suppresses SDW; and (iv) a doping-dependent V can reproduce the narrow, low-T_c superconducting dome of electron-doped cuprates, thus identifying the t-U-V model as a minimal model for these materials. The paper presents schematic U-V phase diagrams, momentum-space pairing distributions, real-space pairing correlations, density-wave structure factors, and doping scans of d-wave pairing strength.

Significance. If the central claims were established, the paper would offer a concrete microscopic mechanism for the electron-hole asymmetry in cuprates: nearest-neighbor Coulomb repulsion suppresses d-wave pairing in electron-doped systems, while attractive V gives an unusual triplet channel. The systematic scans over U, V, and doping, and the simultaneous treatment of pairing and density-wave channels, are strengths of the study. However, the p-wave 'phase' is based on exponentially decaying real-space correlations, which do not by themselves establish long-range order; the doping-dependent V in Fig. 5 is fitted to the experimental T_c dome and then used as evidence for the model's explanatory power; and no statistical uncertainties are reported. With careful rephrasing of the p-wave claim, addition of error bars, and an honest reframing of the V(doping) extraction, the qualitative trends could still be a useful contribution, but the current presentation overstates several conclusions.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section III, last paragraph (Fig. 5)] The p-wave pairing phase is a central result, but the evidence is inconsistent with a long-range ordered phase. The text states that 'the p-wave pairing shows exponential decay in real space and drops to 0 quickly in the distance, indicating short-range correlations.' Exponential decay of the effective real-space correlation C_eff_{p-pair}(r) implies a finite correlation length and therefore no off-diagonal long-range order. The peak in N_eff_{p-pair}(k=0) defined in Eq. (2) is the momentum-space sum of this correlation and remains positive for any exponentially decaying function, so it does not by itself diagnose condensation. The finite-size extrapolation in the inset of Fig. 1(g), described only as 'remains positive,' also cannot distinguish a short-range tendency from a condensate; what is needed is either power-law decay of C_eff(r) or growth of a condensate fraction with system size. As written, the abstract and the phase diagram in Fig. 1(a) overstate the p-wave claim; the authors should either provide thermodynamic-limit evidence for long-range p-wave pairing or explicitly rephrase the p-wave region as a dominant short-range pairing tendency.
  2. [Section II and III, throughout (Figs. 1-5)] The d-wave pairing strength as a function of doping for different V is fitted to a black dotted dome-like curve 'resembling T_c domes in the typical phase diagram of cuprates.' Because V is adjusted doping-by-doping to reproduce the dome, the subsequent claim that this demonstrates 'the critical role of V in capturing the superconducting behavior of cuprates' is partly circular. The inference that V/U ~ 1/4 to 1/3, made 'assuming that the suppression of the electron-doped SC region arises solely from the NN repulsion V,' is presented as an output even though V is a free parameter chosen to match the target. The authors should reframe Fig. 5 as a consistency check under a stated assumption rather than as an independent derivation, and ideally compare the extracted V(δ) with a microscopic estimate or with independent constraints.
  3. [Section III, paragraph after Fig. 1(d)] No statistical uncertainties are reported for the CPQMC data. CPQMC is a stochastic method, and the data points in Figs. 1-5 are shown without error bars; the schematic phase boundaries in Figs. 1(a) and 4(a)-(d) therefore carry unquantified uncertainty. Adding error bars is essential to assess whether, for instance, the rapid suppression of d-wave pairing for V ≳ 1.3 in Fig. 2 is statistically significant and whether the 'negative' d-wave pairing strengths are genuine or noise. A statement about the statistical error and the constrained-path bias would be needed to support the quantitative comparisons drawn in the text.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section II, Eq. (2) and following definitions] The sentence 'From another perspective, the d-wave pairing suggests a d-wave PDW (π,0) state' is a strong claim that is not supported by a real-space pair-density-wave analysis. A peak in the effective momentum-space pairing distribution at (π,0) is not by itself sufficient to identify pair-density-wave order; the authors should either provide supporting real-space evidence or mark this as speculation.
  2. [Section III, Fig. 1 caption] There are notation errors in the definitions of the effective correlations: 'G^σ_{i,j}G^σ_{i,j}' should presumably be 'G^σ_{i,j}G^σ_{i+δ,j+δ'}' (and similarly for the p-wave case). Please also define δ_ζ and δ'_ζ consistently for each pairing symmetry and state which spin indices are used for the triplet p-wave operator.
  3. [Section III, text near Fig. 3] The insets of Figs. 1(e)-(g) are described as 'fitted using exponential function in 1/L.' Please specify which quantity is fitted, how many system sizes are used, and report the fitted parameters or at least the goodness of fit, since the extrapolation is used to argue for the robustness of the pairing states.
  4. [Section IV] The phrase 'consistent with its have incommensurate condensation points' is grammatically unclear; it should be 'consistent with its incommensurate condensation points.' Also, the connection between the slightly staggered real-space behavior of d_xy-wave pairing and the incommensurate peaks near (π,π) is not demonstrated quantitatively.
  5. [Introduction, Ref. [38]] The word 'validness' in the summary ('proves the validness of') should be 'validity.' In addition, the summary repeats the overstatement about the p-wave pairing phase without the caveat of short-range correlations; the summary should be made consistent with the corrected interpretation.
  6. [Section III, Fig. 5] The authors' prior work (Ref. [38], Phys. Rev. B 111, 024509 (2025)) studied the same t-U-V model for hole doping and is cited only briefly. Since the present paper uses the same methodology and definitions, please state explicitly what is new here compared with that work (electron doping, density-wave channels, and the doping dependence of V).

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 5.0 of 10

The V(δ) values in Fig. 5 are fitted to the cuprate Tc dome and then used as evidence for V's role; the CPQMC phase diagram itself is independently computed.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Sec. III, Fig. 5 and following paragraph (page 5)]
    "In Fig. 5, we draw a black dotted dome-like shaped curve to better analyze the effects of doping δ and V on the d-wave pairing parameters. By adjusting V for different doping levels, it is possible to fit this dome-shaped curve, demonstrating the critical role of V in capturing the superconducting behavior of cuprates."

    The dome-shaped curve is introduced as a representation of the experimental T_c dome ('resembling T_c domes'), and the text states that V is adjusted for each doping level to fit this curve. V is therefore a free parameter optimized to reproduce the target, and the conclusion that V plays the critical role in capturing the cuprate superconducting behavior is a restatement of the fitted input, not a model prediction. The same paragraph then assumes that the suppression of the electron-doped SC region arises solely from V to estimate V/U ~ 1/4 to 1/3, so the model-to-experiment agreement is enforced by construction rather than derived or tested.

full rationale

The CPQMC phase diagram for the t-U-V model is computed from the Hamiltonian and correlation functions defined in Sec. II and is not fit to experiment; the d-wave, dxy-wave, and p-wave phase boundaries are internal simulation outputs. The single clear circular step is Fig. 5, where V(δ) is fitted to the cuprate T_c dome and that fitted V is then presented as demonstrating the critical role of V in suppressing d-wave pairing. This is a fitted-input-called-prediction: the agreement with the dome is guaranteed by the parameter choice. Reference [38] is a self-citation and is used as motivation, but the electron-doping p-wave and dxy-wave results are recomputed here with new CPQMC data, so that citation is not load-bearing for the central numerical results. The observed exponential decay of the p-wave real-space correlation is a correctness/interpretation concern rather than a circularity, so it is not counted in the score. Because the phase diagram itself is independent but the cuprate-comparison claim is partly constructed from the fit, the score is 5 rather than 6 or higher.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the CPQMC approximation, the single-band modeling assumption, and the choice of V(delta) to match the experimental Tc dome. No new entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • Doping-dependent nearest-neighbor repulsion V(delta) = V/U ~ 1/4 to 1/3 depending on doping
    In Fig. 5 the paper adjusts V with doping to reproduce the cuprate Tc dome (black dotted curve). This fit is then used to argue that NN repulsion suppresses d-wave SC in electron-doped cuprates.
  • On-site repulsion U = U = 4t
    U=4 is chosen as representative intermediate coupling to qualitatively capture cuprates, and the suppression of d-wave is demonstrated mainly at this value; other U values are scanned but not used for the experimental comparison.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption CPQMC with a constrained path approximation gives ground-state pairing correlations free of sign-problem bias in the t-U-V model.
    All numerical results use CPQMC [51,52]; the method controls the sign problem via an approximate trial-node constraint, so the central pairing and density-wave correlations inherit that approximation without an independent benchmark.
  • domain assumption The square-lattice t-U-V model with t'=0.2 is an adequate minimal model for electron-doped cuprates.
    t'=0.2 is taken from band-structure literature [43,50], and the paper assumes that the single-band model plus nearest-neighbor V captures the essential physics (Sec. II, IV).
  • domain assumption The effective pair momentum distribution function N_eff(k) with the uncorrelated G-G term subtracted identifies the pairing phase and its momentum structure.
    N_eff and C_eff are defined in Sec. II following [53,54]; interpreting peaks as condensation and the maximum at Q=(pi,0) as d-wave PDW relies on this diagnostic.
  • domain assumption Exponential fitting of finite-size data in 1/L extrapolates to the thermodynamic limit and supports the phase assignment.
    Insets of Fig. 1(e)-(g) show lattice-size dependence fitted with an exponential; no rigorous scaling theory is given, and the p-wave correlation is reported to decay exponentially in real space.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Pairing phase diagram for electron-doped cuprates in the square-lattice $t-U-V$ Hubbard model." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GHSYSRLR

@misc{pith2026250207079,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Pairing phase diagram for electron-doped cuprates in the square-lattice $t-U-V$ Hubbard model},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GHSYSRLR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.07079}
}
abstract

Motivated by significant discrepancies between experimental observations of electron-doped cuprates and numerical results of the Hubbard model, we investigate the role of nearest-neighbor (NN) electron interactions $V$ by studying the $t-U-V$ model on square lattices. Upon doping $\delta$= 0.153, by using constrained path quantum Monte Carlo (CPQMC) method, we find that NN electron attraction $V$ can notably drive an exotic $p$-wave spin-triplet pairing, while the NN electron repulsion $V$ will suppress the $d_{x^2-y^2}$-wave ($d$-wave) pairing and triggers the $d_{xy}$-wave pairing. Especially in the intermediate coupling regime, as NN repulsion increases, the intensity of $d_{xy}$-wave pairing also increases, further suppressing the presence of $d$-wave pairing, which may help explain the notable suppression of $d$-wave pairing in electron-doped cuprate superconductors. Besides the pairing phase, we also find that the NN electron attraction $V$ has no significant effect on spin density wave (SDW) and charge density wave (CDW), but repulsion $V$ significantly enhanced CDW and suppressed SDW. Our study suggests the $t-U-V$ Hubbard model can serve as the minimal model to capture the essential physics of the electron-doped cuprates.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.07079 by the authors.

Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (Color online) The competition and distinction of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (Color online) Charge and spin density correlation. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. FIG. 5. (Color online) The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    J. G. Bednorz and K. A. M¨ uller, Possible highTc super- conductivity in the Ba−La−Cu−O system, Z Physik B 64, 189 (1986)

    work page 1986

  2. [2]

    C. C. Tsuei and J. R. Kirtley, Pairing symmetry in cuprate superconductors, Reviews of modern physics72, 969 (2000)

    work page 2000

  3. [3]

    Imada, A

    M. Imada, A. Fujimori, and Y. Tokura, Metal-insulator transitions, Reviews of modern physics70, 1039 (1998)

    1998

  4. [4]

    Orenstein and A

    J. Orenstein and A. J. Millis, Advances in the physics of high-temperature superconductivity, Science (New York, N.Y.)288, 468 (2000)

    work page 2000

  5. [5]

    P. A. Lee, N. Nagaosa, and X.-G. Wen, Doping a Mott in- sulator: Physics of high-temperature superconductivity, Reviews of modern physics78, 17 (2006)

    work page 2006

  6. [6]

    N. P. Armitage, P. Fournier, and R. L. Greene, Progress and perspectives on electron-doped cuprates, Reviews of modern physics82, 2421 (2010)

    work page 2010

  7. [7]

    Fradkin, S

    E. Fradkin, S. A. Kivelson, and J. M. Tranquada, Col- loquium: Theory of intertwined orders in high temper- ature superconductors, Reviews of modern physics87, 457 (2015)

    work page 2015

  8. [8]

    Zhou, W.-S

    X. Zhou, W.-S. Lee, M. Imada, N. Trivedi, P. Phillips, H.-Y. Kee, P. T¨ orm¨ a, and M. Eremets, High-temperature superconductivity, Nature reviews. Physics3, 462 (2021)

    work page 2021

Show all 60 references
  1. [9]

    Keimer, S

    B. Keimer, S. A. Kivelson, M. R. Norman, S. Uchida, and J. Zaanen, From quantum matter to high-temperature superconductivity in copper oxides, Nature518, 179 (2015)

    2015

  2. [10]

    F. C. Zhang and T. M. Rice, Effective Hamiltonian for the superconducting Cu oxides, Physical review. B, Con- densed matter37, 3759 (1988)

    1988

  3. [11]

    P. W. Anderson, P. A. Lee, M. Randeria, T. M. Rice, N. Trivedi, and F. C. Zhang, The physics behind high- temperature superconducting cuprates: the plain vanilla version of R VB, Journal of physics. Condensed matter: an Institute of Physics journal16, R755 (2004)

    2004

  4. [12]

    Jiang, D

    S. Jiang, D. J. Scalapino, and S. R. White, Ground-state phase diagram of thet-t’-Jmodel, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America118, 10.1073/pnas.2109978118 (2021)

    2021 doi

  5. [13]

    M. Qin, T. Sch¨ afer, S. Andergassen, P. Corboz, and E. Gull, The Hubbard model: A computational perspec- tive, Annual review of condensed matter physics13, 275 (2022)

    2022

  6. [14]

    P. Mai, G. Balduzzi, S. Johnston, and T. A. Maier, Or- bital structure of the effective pairing interaction in the high-temperature superconducting cuprates, npj Quan- tum Materials6, 1 (2021)

    2021

  7. [15]

    D. J. Scalapino, A common thread: The pairing inter- action for unconventional superconductors, Reviews of modern physics84, 1383 (2012)

    2012

  8. [16]

    J. A. Sobota, Y. He, and Z.-X. Shen, Angle-resolved photoemission studies of quantum materials, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 025006 (2021)

    2021

  9. [17]

    Jiang and T

    H.-C. Jiang and T. P. Devereaux, Superconductivity in the doped Hubbard model and its interplay with next- nearest hopping t’, Science365, 1424 (2019)

    2019

  10. [18]

    Qin, C.-M

    M. Qin, C.-M. Chung, H. Shi, E. Vitali, C. Hubig, U. Schollw¨ ock, S. R. White, and S. Zhang (Simons Col- laboration on the Many-Electron Problem), Absence of 7 superconductivity in the pure two-dimensional hubbard model, Phys. Rev. X10, 031016 (2020)

    2020

  11. [19]

    F. Chen, F. D. M. Haldane, and D. N. Sheng, D-wave and pair-density-wave superconductivity in the square- lattice t-J model, arXiv [cond-mat.supr-con] (2023), arXiv:2311.15092 [cond-mat.supr-con]

    2023 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Xu, C.-M

    H. Xu, C.-M. Chung, M. Qin, U. Schollw¨ ock, S. R. White, and S. Zhang, Coexistence of superconductivity with par- tially filled stripes in the hubbard model, Science384, eadh7691 (2024)

    2024

  13. [21]

    X. Lu, F. Chen, W. Zhu, D. N. Sheng, and S.-S. Gong, Emergent superconductivity and competing charge or- ders in hole-doped square-lattice t-J model, Physical re- view letters132, 066002 (2024)

    2024

  14. [22]

    E. M. Motoyama, G. Yu, I. M. Vishik, O. P. Vajk, P. K. Mang, and M. Greven, Spin correlations in the electron-doped high-transition-temperature super- conductor Nd2−xCexCuO4±δ, Nature445, 186 (2007)

    2007

  15. [23]

    Q. Chen, L. Qiao, F. Zhang, and Z. Zhu, Phase diagram of the square-latticet−j−vmodel for electron-doped cuprates, Phys. Rev. B110, 045134 (2024)

    2024

  16. [24]

    Uefuji, T

    T. Uefuji, T. Kubo, K. Yamada, M. Fujita, K. Kurahashi, I. Watanabe, and K. Nagamine, Coexistence of antifer- romagnetic ordering and high-Tc superconductivity in electron-doped superconductor Nd2-Ce CuO4, Physica. C, Superconductivity357-360, 208 (2001)

    2001

  17. [25]

    Comin, A

    R. Comin, A. Frano, M. M. Yee, Y. Yoshida, H. Eisaki, E. Schierle, E. Weschke, R. Sutarto, F. He, A. Soumya- narayanan, Y. He, M. Le Tacon, I. S. Elfimov, J. E. Hoffman, G. A. Sawatzky, B. Keimer, and A. Dama- scelli, Charge order driven by Fermi-arc instability in Bi3Sr2−xLax...

    2014

  18. [26]

    E. G. Moon and S. Sachdev, Competition between spin density wave order and superconductivity in the under- doped cuprates, Physical review. B, Condensed matter 80, 035117 (2009)

    2009

  19. [27]

    Z. Shi, P. G. Baity, J. Terzic, T. Sasagawa, and D. Popovi´ c, Pair density wave at high magnetic fields in cuprates with charge and spin orders, Nature commu- nications11, 3323 (2020)

    2020

  20. [28]

    Y. Sato, S. Kasahara, H. Murayama, Y. Kasahara, E.- G. Moon, T. Nishizaki, T. Loew, J. Porras, B. Keimer, T. Shibauchi, and Y. Matsuda, Thermodynamic evidence for a nematic phase transition at the onset of the pseu- dogap in YBa 2Cu3Oy, Nature physics13, 1074 (2017)

    2017

  21. [29]

    Doiron-Leyraud, O

    N. Doiron-Leyraud, O. Cyr-Choini` ere, S. Badoux, A. Ataei, C. Collignon, A. Gourgout, S. Dufour- Beaus´ ejour, F. F. Tafti, F. Lalibert´ e, M.-E. Boulanger, M. Matusiak, D. Graf, M. Kim, J.-S. Zhou, N. Momono, T. Kurosawa, H. Takagi, and L. Taillefer, Pseudogap phase of cupra...

    2017

  22. [30]

    Y. He, Y. Yin, M. Zech, A. Soumyanarayanan, M. M. Yee, T. Williams, M. C. Boyer, K. Chatterjee, W. D. Wise, I. Zeljkovic, T. Kondo, T. Takeuchi, H. Ikuta, P. Mistark, R. S. Markiewicz, A. Bansil, S. Sachdev, E. W. Hudson, and J. E. Hoffman, Fermi surface and pseudogap evolutio...

    2014

  23. [31]

    Himeda, T

    A. Himeda, T. Kato, and M. Ogata, Stripe states with spatially oscillating d-wave superconductivity in the two- dimensional t-t’-J model, Physical review letters88, 117001 (2002)

    2002

  24. [32]

    Corboz, T

    P. Corboz, T. M. Rice, and M. Troyer, Competing states in the t-J model: uniform D-wave state versus stripe state, Physical review letters113, 046402 (2014)

    2014

  25. [33]

    Zheng and G

    B.-X. Zheng and G. K.-L. Chan, Ground-state phase di- agram of the square lattice Hubbard model from density matrix embedding theory, Physical review. B, Condensed matter93, 035126 (2016)

    2016

  26. [34]

    have revealed an anomalously sizable attractive in- teraction between NN electrons, possibly mediated by phonons [34–36]. Such an effective attraction, although not so strong as the on-site Coulomb repulsion, is compa- rable to the electron hopping integral (V∼ −t) [34], and t...

    2025 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Z. Chen, Y. Wang, S. N. Rebec, T. Jia, M. Hashimoto, D. Lu, B. Moritz, R. G. Moore, T. P. Devereaux, and Z.- X. Shen, Anomalously strong near-neighbor attraction in doped 1D cuprate chains, Science373, 1235 (2021)

    2021

  28. [36]

    Y. Wang, Z. Chen, T. Shi, B. Moritz, Z.-X. Shen, and T. P. Devereaux, Phonon-Mediated Long-Range Attrac- tive Interaction in One-Dimensional Cuprates, Physical review letters127, 197003 (2021)

    2021

  29. [37]

    T. Tang, B. Moritz, C. Peng, Z.-X. Shen, and T. P. Devereaux, Traces of electron-phonon coupling in one- dimensional cuprates, Nature communications14, 3129 (2023)

    2023

  30. [38]

    C. Peng, Y. Wang, J. Wen, Y. S. Lee, T. P. Dev- ereaux, and H.-C. Jiang, Enhanced superconductivity by near-neighbor attraction in the doped extended Hub- bard model, Physical review. B, Condensed matter107, L201102 (2023)

    2023

  31. [39]

    Z. Cao, J. Li, J. Su, T. Ying, and H.-K. Tang, Dominant p-wave pairing induced by nearest-neighbor attraction in the square-lattice extended hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B111, 024509 (2025)

    2025

  32. [40]

    X. Lu, H. Guo, W.-Q. Chen, D. N. Sheng, and S.-S. Gong, Tuning competition between charge order and supercon- ductivity in the square-latticet-t ′-Jmodel, arXiv [cond- mat.str-el] (2024), arXiv:2409.15270 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2024 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Misawa and M

    T. Misawa and M. Imada, Origin of high- Tcsuperconductivity in doped Hubbard models and their extensions: Roles of uniform charge fluctuations, Physical review. B, Condensed matter and materials physics90, 10.1103/physrevb.90.115137 (2014)

    2014 doi

  34. [42]

    J. D. Sau and S. Sachdev, Mean-field theory of competing orders in metals with antiferromagnetic exchange inter- actions, Physical review. B, Condensed matter and ma- terials physics89, 10.1103/physrevb.89.075129 (2014)

    2014 doi

  35. [43]

    Jiang, U

    M. Jiang, U. R. H¨ ahner, T. C. Schulthess, and T. A. Maier, d -wave superconductivity in the presence of nearest-neighbor Coulomb repulsion, Physical review. B 97, 10.1103/physrevb.97.184507 (2018)

    2018 doi

  36. [44]

    Hirayama, Y

    M. Hirayama, Y. Yamaji, T. Misawa, and M. Imada, Ab initio effective Hamiltonians for cuprate superconductors, Physical review. B, Condensed matter98, 134501 (2018)

    2018

  37. [45]

    Banerjee, C

    A. Banerjee, C. P´ epin, and A. Ghosal, Charge, bond, and pair density wave orders in a strongly correlated system, Physical review. B105, 10.1103/physrevb.105.134505 (2022)

    2022 doi

  38. [46]

    Bejas, R

    M. Bejas, R. Zeyher, and A. Greco, Ring-like shaped charge modulations in the t-J model with long- range Coulomb interaction, Physical review. B106, 10.1103/physrevb.106.224512 (2022)

    2022 doi

  39. [47]

    Boschini, M

    F. Boschini, M. Minola, R. Sutarto, E. Schierle, M. Bluschke, S. Das, Y. Yang, M. Michiardi, Y. C. Shao, X. Feng, S. Ono, R. D. Zhong, J. A. Schneeloch, G. D. Gu, E. Weschke, F. He, Y. D. Chuang, B. Keimer, A. Damascelli, A. Frano, and E. H. da Silva Neto, Dy- namic electron c...

    2021

  40. [48]

    S´ en´ echal, A

    D. S´ en´ echal, A. G. R. Day, V. Bouliane, and A.- M. S. Tremblay, Resilience ofd-wave superconductivity to nearest-neighbor repulsion, Phys. Rev. B87, 075123 (2013)

    2013

  41. [49]

    Reymbaut, M

    A. Reymbaut, M. Charlebois, M. F. Asiani, L. Fratino, P. S´ emon, G. Sordi, and A.-M. S. Tremblay, Antagonis- tic effects of nearest-neighbor repulsion on the supercon- ducting pairing dynamics in the doped mott insulator regime, Phys. Rev. B94, 155146 (2016)

    2016

  42. [50]

    Jiang, Enhancingd-wave superconductivity with nearest-neighbor attraction in the extended Hubbard model, Physical review

    M. Jiang, Enhancingd-wave superconductivity with nearest-neighbor attraction in the extended Hubbard model, Physical review. B, Condensed matter105, 024510 (2022)

    2022

  43. [51]

    O. K. Andersen, A. I. Liechtenstein, O. Jepsen, and F. Paulsen, LDA energy bands, low-energy hamiltoni- ans,t ′,t ′′,t ⊥(k), andJ ⊥, The Journal of physics and chemistry of solids56, 1573 (1995)

    1995

  44. [52]

    Zhang, J

    S. Zhang, J. Carlson, and J. E. Gubernatis, Constrained path quantum Monte Carlo method for fermion ground states, Physical review letters74, 3652 (1995)

    1995

  45. [53]

    Zhang, J

    S. Zhang, J. Carlson, and J. E. Gubernatis, Constrained path Monte Carlo method for fermion ground states, Physical review. B, Condensed matter55, 7464 (1997)

    1997

  46. [54]

    S. R. White, D. J. Scalapino, R. L. Sugar, N. E. Bick- ers, and R. T. Scalettar, Attractive and repulsive pair- ing interaction vertices for the two-dimensional Hubbard model, Physical review. B, Condensed matter39, 839 (1989)

    1989

  47. [55]

    Ying and S

    T. Ying and S. Wessel, Pairing and chiral spin density wave instabilities on the honeycomb lattice: A compara- tive quantum Monte Carlo study, Physical review. B97, 10.1103/physrevb.97.075127 (2018)

    2018 doi

  48. [56]

    T. Dahm, V. Hinkov, S. V. Borisenko, A. A. Ko- rdyuk, V. B. Zabolotnyy, J. Fink, B. B¨ uchner, D. J. Scalapino, W. Hanke, and B. Keimer, Strength of the spin-fluctuation-mediated pairing interaction in a high-temperature superconductor, Nature physics5, 217 (2009)

    2009

  49. [57]

    X. Dong, L. Del Re, A. Toschi, and E. Gull, Mechanism of superconductivity in the Hubbard model at interme- diate interaction strength, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 119, e2205048119 (2022)

    2022

  50. [58]

    Chang and S

    C.-C. Chang and S. Zhang, Spin and charge order in the doped hubbard model: long-wavelength collective modes, Physical review letters104, 116402 (2010)

    2010

  51. [59]

    Zhang, T

    L. Zhang, T. Guo, Y. Mou, Q. Chen, and T. Ma, En- hancement ofd-wave pairing in the striped phase with nearest neighbor attraction, Physical review. B, Con- densed matter105, 155154 (2022)

    2022

  52. [60]

    D. Song, G. Han, W. Kyung, J. Seo, S. Cho, B. S. Kim, M. Arita, K. Shimada, H. Namatame, M. Taniguchi, Y. Yoshida, H. Eisaki, S. R. Park, and C. Kim, Electron number-based phase diagram of Pr {1- x}LaCe {x}CuO {4-δ}and possible absence of dispar- ity between electron- and hole...

    2017

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.