QCD Anderson transition with overlap valence quarks on a twisted-mass sea -- an update

Lorenz von Smekal; Robin Kehr

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 30 references

QCD Anderson transition with overlap valence quarks on a twisted-mass sea -- an update

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper claims the QCD mobility edge survives the chiral transition: new low-temperature data keep it near 86-88 MeV for T = 133-159 MeV, overturning the earlier vanishing prediction.

desk verdict Honest update with genuinely new data, but the headline claim that the mobility edge survives at the chiral transition is carried by two low-temperature points measured with a proxy the authors themselves distrust; worth reading, not yet convincing. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.07434 v1 pith:53BD34OO submitted 2025-02-11 hep-lat hep-ph

Robin Kehr , Lorenz von Smekal This is my paper · ORCID

classification hep-lathep-ph

keywords QCDAndersontransitionmobilityedgeoverlapoperatorlocalizationchiralsymmetryrestorationtwisted-massfermionslatticefinite-temperature

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper updates a lattice-QCD study of the QCD Anderson transition, asking whether the energy threshold (mobility edge) that separates localized from delocalized low Dirac eigenmodes vanishes exactly when chiral symmetry is restored. The earlier analysis had extrapolated the mobility edge downward to zero at the chiral-limit transition temperature $T_c \approx 132$ MeV. New data at lower temperatures ($T = 133$ and $159$ MeV) instead find the extracted mobility edge roughly constant at $88(5)$ and $86(3)$ MeV, close to $T_c$, so the paper now argues that it does not vanish there. This matters because the relation between localization and chiral restoration is one proposed route to understanding how the chiral and deconfinement transitions are connected, and because a non-vanishing mobility edge challenges the claim that localized near-zero modes cannot coexist with Goldstone bosons in the chiral limit.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the overlap Dirac operator $D_{\mathrm{ov}} = \frac{\rho}{a}(1 + \operatorname{sgn} K)$, which realizes chiral symmetry on the lattice through the Ginsparg-Wilson relation, with eigenvalues mapped by the stereographic projection $\lambda' = \frac{i\,\mathrm{Im}\,\lambda}{1-\frac{a}{2\rho}\mathrm{Re}\,\lambda}$ to move closer to the continuum. The localization diagnostic is the relative point volume $r(\lambda)=P_2^{-1}(\lambda)/|\Lambda|$, where $P_q$ is the inverse participation ratio, a number that is small when the mode spreads over many sites and large when it concentrates; the mobility edge is extracted as the inflection point of this averaged curve via a cubic/quartic Taylor fit. The near-zero spectral density is tied to the chiral condensate through the Banks-Casher relation, and the temperature dependence is judged against a critical scaling ansatz $\lambda_c(T)=b(T-T_0)^\nu$.

What would settle it

At fixed lattice spacing and pion mass, repeat the overlap eigenmode computation on the same D210 ensembles at a second, larger spatial volume and perform a finite-size scaling analysis of the inverse participation ratios below the apparent mobility edge; if modes with $\lambda \lesssim 88$ MeV spread with volume or the inflection point of $r(\lambda)$ shifts, the non-vanishing $\lambda_c$ is a finite-volume artifact, whereas volume-independent behavior would confirm the plateau.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the D210 ensemble of $N_f=2+1+1$ twisted-mass Wilson fermions at a lattice spacing $a=0.0619(18)$ fm and pion mass $m_\pi=225(7)$ MeV, the paper computes low-lying overlap eigenmodes and defines the mobility edge proxy $\lambda_c$ as the inflection point of the bin-averaged relative point volume $r(\lambda)=P_2^{-1}(\lambda)/|\Lambda|$. The central new result is that $\lambda_c$ does not continue its high-temperature decrease to zero as the temperature approaches the chiral transition: the points at $T=159(5)$ MeV and $T=133(4)$ MeV give $\lambda_c=86(3)$ MeV and $88(5)$ MeV, respectively, essentially the same as the value at $T=199(6)$ MeV within errors, rather than following the downward quadratic trend. A scaling fit $\lambda_c(T)=b(T-T_0)^\nu$ to the higher-temperature data (excluding the two lowest points) gives $T_0=139(4)(5)$ MeV and $\nu=1.24(2)$, so the extrapolated zero is still near the chiral-limit $T_c=132^{+3}_{-6}$ MeV, but the plateau below $T\approx T_{pc}$ contradicts the previous prediction that the mobility edge vanishes at $T_c$. The paper proposes that $r(\lambda)$ may become an unreliable localization measure at these temperatures, possibly because a second, infrared mobility edge at $\lambda_{\mathrm{IR}}=0$ annihilates with the decreasing $\lambda_c$, and it calls for volume-scaling checks to distinguish a true plateau from an artifact.

Load-bearing premise

The analysis treats the inflection point of a single-volume localization measure as the true boundary between localized and delocalized modes, an assumption the paper itself doubts at the lowest temperatures, so the flat mobility edge near $T_c$ could be an artifact of the observable rather than a physical effect.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The scaling fit places the Anderson transition at $T_0 = 139(4)(5)$ MeV, above the chiral-limit $T_c = 132^{+3}_{-6}$ MeV, so localization can persist slightly above the chiral transition.
A non-vanishing mobility edge near $T_c$ means localized near-zero eigenmodes survive at temperatures where chiral symmetry is effectively restored, complicating the argument that localized near-zero modes are incompatible with Goldstone bosons.
The measured critical exponent $\nu = 1.24(2)$ is noticeably below the three-dimensional unitary Anderson value $\nu \approx 1.44$, indicating either stronger corrections to scaling or a different universality class.
Because $\lambda_c$ is essentially flat from $T=159$ MeV down to $T=133$ MeV, the inflection-point proxy stops following the high-temperature scaling curve, which is why the paper calls for a volume-dependence check to validate the plateau.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If volume-scaling studies confirm the plateau, the cleanest reading is that the mobility edge and the chiral transition are not locked together at physical quark masses; they would coincide only in the chiral limit, making the Anderson transition a distinct, slightly higher-temperature phenomenon in real QCD.
The gradient-flow smearing proposed in the outlook is a testable handle on the plateau: if $\lambda_c$ at temperatures around 133 to 159 MeV drifts with flow time, the apparent non-vanishing edge is ultraviolet contamination rather than an infrared feature.
The two-mobility-edge annihilation scenario predicts that in the chiral limit all modes below the would-be $\lambda_c$ are delocalized just above $T_c$, a statement that can be probed by quenched-style finite-size scaling at a single physical volume.
Applying the same inflection-point method to the alternative ratio $P_2^{-1}/(P_3^{-1})^{1/2}$, which shows a dip at the mobility edge in the SU(2) Higgs model, would give an independent localization diagnostic for the same eigenmodes without generating new gauge configurations.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The new thing here is real: lower-temperature eigenmode data on the D210 ensembles (Nt=14, 16, 18), an improved scale setting, and the observation that the extracted mobility edge sticks near 86–88 MeV at T=133 and 159 MeV instead of extrapolating to zero. That plateau, if it holds up, would indeed revise the picture from your own PRD paper. I also want to credit the authors for being transparent about what they do and do not trust: they show the excluded points, they give statistical and systematic errors separately, and they openly say that r(λ) might be inappropriate as a localization measure at the temperatures where the plateau appears. That is honest, useful scholarship, and it makes the paper easy to read critically.

The soft spot is exactly where the stress-test note points. The contradiction with the earlier vanishing-at-Tc prediction rests entirely on the two red points in Fig. 3, which are excluded from the scaling fit. The fit that is retained, λc = b(T−T0)^ν, uses only the hotter points and gives T0 = 139(4)(5) MeV, consistent with the old prediction. So the advertised update is, strictly speaking, a two-point story. One of those points (Nt=24) has six configurations and a 18 MeV systematic error, and both come from the regime where the near-zero spectral density is large and where a finite-volume S-shaped r(λ) can fake a nonzero inflection point even if all modes are delocalized. There is no volume scaling, no independent localization observable, and only one lattice spacing. The authors know all this; they say a finite-size scaling analysis is needed and is currently too expensive. But they still put the non-vanishing claim in the abstract, which goes beyond what the data can currently support.

The infrared mobility edge discussion is interesting and well-grounded in the quenched literature, but it is a speculation, not a result. The same goes for the mismatch of ν: they report 1.24(2) versus the 3D unitary Anderson expectation of about 1.44, and they offer plausible explanations. That is fine as a proceedings contribution, but it adds to the sense that the scaling picture is not yet clean.

Who is this for? Lattice people working on Dirac eigenmode localization and the relation between chiral restoration and localization. They will find the new data table useful and the discussion of the second mobility edge thought-provoking. As a referee I would send it back for revision if it were a full paper: the abstract should soften the claim, and ideally the authors should add at least a second volume or another localization measure. For a LATTICE proceedings, what is here is acceptable as a status report, provided the reader does not mistake the plateau for an established physical statement.

My recommendation: engage with it, cite the data if you work in this area, but do not build anything on the non-vanishing claim until the volume scaling is done. Serious referee time: yes, it deserves a careful look, and the referee should ask the authors to either strengthen the evidence or temper the conclusion.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports new overlap-eigenmode data for the D210 twisted-mass ensemble at five lower temperatures (Nt=14, 16, 18, 20, 24), updating Ref. [1] with improved lattice spacing, pion mass, and pseudocritical temperature. The mobility edge lambda_c is estimated as the inflection point of the bin-averaged relative point volume, Eqs. (3)-(5). A scaling fit lambda_c(T)=b(T-T0)^nu to the higher-temperature points gives T0=139(4)(5) MeV and nu=1.24(2). The two lowest-temperature points (T=159 and 133 MeV) are excluded from the fit because they deviate strongly; they yield lambda_c about 86 and 88 MeV, which the paper interprets as evidence that the mobility edge does not vanish at the chiral transition temperature Tc=132(+3/-6) MeV. The paper discusses a possible scenario involving an infrared mobility edge and outlines planned finite-size and localization-measure checks.

Significance. If the plateau at lambda_c around 86-88 MeV were confirmed by finite-size scaling and a second localization observable, it would contradict the previous prediction from Ref. [1] that the mobility edge vanishes at Tc, and it would provide a concrete link between the QCD Anderson transition and chiral symmetry restoration. The strength of the paper is that it presents a direct measurement of the inflection point from overlap eigenmodes, with a transparent table of statistical and systematic errors, and it is explicit about the caveats: single lattice spacing and volume, small m_pi L, low statistics for Nt=24, and the possible inadequacy of r(lambda) as a localization measure at low temperature. The interpretation, however, goes beyond what the present data can establish.

major comments (4)

[Section 2, Table 1 and Fig. 3] The central claim that the mobility edge does not vanish at Tc rests entirely on the two red points (Nt=20 at T=159 MeV and Nt=24 at T=133 MeV) that are excluded from the scaling fit, with only six configurations for Nt=24. Because no finite-size scaling analysis is presented, the plateau in lambda_c could be an artifact of the inflection-point proxy at finite volume rather than a physical nonzero mobility edge.
[Section 2] The paper explicitly states that r(lambda) "might be inappropriate as measure of localization for these temperatures" (paragraph after Eq. (3) and around Fig. 1). These are exactly the temperatures where the non-vanishing claim is made. The authors should provide a concrete cross-check, for example the P2/P3 ratio mentioned in Section 3 or a second volume, before presenting the plateau as an update to the previous prediction.
[Section 2, Eq. (7) and Fig. 3] The scaling fit uses only the high-temperature points and yields T0=139(4)(5) MeV, which is consistent with the previous vanishing-at-Tc prediction. Excluding the two points that disagree with the fit is post hoc; the paper does not give an a priori criterion for their exclusion beyond "strong deviation." A discussion of the fit including all points, or a quantitative justification for the exclusion, is needed to support the claimed contradiction.
[Section 2] All results are obtained at a single lattice spacing and a single spatial volume with m_pi L about 3.39, so the quoted T0 and nu cannot be used to claim a continuum or thermodynamic-limit result. In addition, the observed nu=1.24(2) differs significantly from the expected 3D unitary Anderson value of about 1.44, and the paper's explanation in terms of scaling-window corrections is not quantified. The wording of the abstract and conclusions should be tempered accordingly.

minor comments (4)

[Abstract and Section 3] The abstract contains the ungrammatical phrase "our the mobility edge estimate" and Section 3 contains typographical errors such as "accelaration" and "worthwile."
[Section 1] There are several typographical issues: "seperates" should be "separates," and "parameter rho was to 1.4" should be "parameter rho was set to 1.4."
[Figure 2 caption] The caption contains a duplicated word: "for for each temperature."
[Section 2] The definition of the systematic error as "the deviation to the inflection point of the second best fit" is not reproducible without a precise selection criterion for what constitutes the second best fit; please specify this procedure.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the update's central observation is a direct measurement, and the retained scaling fit is explicitly not used to support the non-vanishing claim; the self-citations are background or the prediction being superseded.

full rationale

The paper's central claim—that the mobility edge estimate does not vanish at the chiral transition temperature—rests on the directly measured inflection points for the two lowest-temperature ensembles, Nt=20 and Nt=24, listed in Table 1 as lambda_c = 86(3)(3)(5) MeV and 88(3)(5)(18) MeV. The paper explicitly excludes these points from the scaling fit: 'The most recent data points with Nt in {20,24} marked in red were however excluded from the fit due to the strong deviation. Contrary to the fit prediction the mobility edge does not further decrease and eventually vanish here.' Thus the claim is not forced by the fit; it is an observation that the data deviate from the fit. The scaling fit of Eq. (7) extracts T0 = 139(4)(5) MeV and nu = 1.24(2) from the higher-temperature points, and the paper honestly notes that this agrees with the previous extrapolation of Ref. [1], so no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The mobility edge proxy is defined via Eqs. (3)-(5), but this is an independent operational definition, not an equation that reduces the target result to an input; the paper explicitly flags the proxy's possible inadequacy at low temperature and the need for finite-size scaling, which is a validity caveat rather than circularity. The self-citations to Refs. [1] and [5] are not load-bearing: Ref. [1] supplies the previous prediction being updated and a scenario, while the infrared-mobility-edge scenario is supported by independent quenched studies Refs. [19,20]. No equation in the paper is equivalent by construction to another, and no input is fitted to a subset and then presented as an independent prediction of the same quantity. The only mild concern is the presence of self-citations in background and outlook, which are not load-bearing; hence a low non-circularity score is appropriate.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central result is an empirical measurement, but it depends on several unproven modeling choices: the relative point volume as a localization measure, the inflection-point proxy, the assumed critical scaling form, and the application of the stereographic projection. The paper inherits lattice spacing, Tpc, and mπ from external references. The scaling fit introduces free parameters T0, ν, and b, and the per-temperature bin sizes/windows are hand-tuned. No new physical entities are introduced, though an infrared mobility edge is hypothesized as an interpretation.

free parameters (6)

T0 (Anderson transition temperature) = 139(4)(5) MeV
Zero of the scaling fit λc(T)=b(T-T0)^ν fitted to the high-temperature data; determines where the mobility edge would vanish if the low-T points followed the fit. The low-T points were excluded from the fit.
ν (critical exponent) = 1.24(2)
Exponent in the scaling fit; differs from the 3D unitary Anderson model value (≈1.44), which the paper attributes to scaling-window effects or quark-mass corrections.
b (amplitude of scaling fit) = not reported
Multiplicative amplitude in λc(T)=b(T-T0)^ν; fitted to the data, value not tabulated.
Fit windows [λl, λr] and bin sizes Δλ per temperature = e.g., Δλ=22.8 MeV, [0,296] MeV at T=133 MeV; vary per ensemble
Chosen by hand at each temperature to make χ²/d.o.f.≈1 for the Taylor fit Eq. (5); different choices shift the extracted λc, and the systematic error is estimated from the second-best fit.
Taylor polynomial coefficients (r_c, b, c, d) = not reported
Coefficients in the cubic/quartic fit Eq. (5) used to locate the inflection point; fitted and then discarded except for λc.
Overlap mass parameter ρ = 1.4
Negative Wilson mass parameter in D_ov, set to 1.4 to optimize locality based on Ref. [12]; a fixed input rather than a fitted parameter in this analysis.

assumptions (5)

standard math The overlap operator D_ov = ρ/a (1 + sgn K) satisfies the Ginsparg-Wilson relation and provides exact chiral symmetry on the lattice.
Basis for the definition of the eigenmodes and for connecting the spectral density near zero to the chiral condensate via Banks-Casher (Section 1).
domain assumption The inflection point of the bin-averaged relative point volume r(λ) is a valid proxy for the mobility edge.
The paper defines λc as this inflection point (Section 1, Eqs. 3-5) and later suspects it may be invalid at low temperature (Section 2).
domain assumption The scaling form λc(T)=b(T-T0)^ν describes the temperature dependence of the mobility edge.
Used to extrapolate in Figure 3; the two lowest-T points violate it and are excluded, and the paper suggests it may only hold in the chiral limit.
domain assumption The stereographic projection λ' approximates the continuum limit better than the eigenangle.
Section 1: 'Since it is believed that the stereographic projection brings us closer to the continuum limit, we only analyzed this variant here.'
domain assumption The tmfT D210 ensembles represent finite-temperature QCD with Nf=2+1+1 at mπ=225 MeV.
The analysis is performed on these ensembles at a single lattice spacing; no continuum extrapolation is attempted.

invented entities (1)

Infrared mobility edge (λ_IR = 0)
purpose: Postulated second mobility edge at zero eigenvalue that merges with the decreasing λc to explain why λc does not vanish at Tc.
The paper invokes the quenched-QCD results of Alexandru and Horvath (Refs. [19,20]) to motivate this scenario, but provides no direct evidence in the present full-QCD data; it is an interpretive hypothesis.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of QCD Anderson transition with overlap valence quarks on a twisted-mass sea -- an update." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/53BD34OO

@misc{pith2026250207434,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: QCD Anderson transition with overlap valence quarks on a twisted-mass sea -- an update},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/53BD34OO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.07434}
}

read the original abstract

We investigate the QCD Anderson transition by studying the low-lying eigenmodes of the overlap operator in the background of gauge configurations with 2+1+1 quark flavors of twisted-mass Wilson fermions. The mobility edge, below which eigenmodes are localized, is estimated by the inflection point of the relative volume. The analysis of its temperature dependence suggests a close relation of localization to chiral symmetry restoration. We update our previous work [1] by including recent results on lower temperatures and switching to improved estimates of the lattice spacing and pseudocritical temperature respectively pion mass. Contrary to the previous prediction, our the mobility edge estimate does not vanish at the temperature of the chiral phase transition. We discuss a possible scenario, supported by literature, for why this could be the case. [1] R. Kehr, D. Smith and L. von Smekal, QCD Anderson transition with overlap valence quarks on a twisted-mass sea, Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 074512 [2304.13617].

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.07434 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** Distributions of (stereographically projected) overlap eigenvalues for different temperatures. The inflection points of the relative volumes (see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Bin-averaged relative eigenmode volumes as measure of localization for different temperatures. The inflection points are highlighted by red circles, where only the corresponding statistical error is shown. The fit window [𝜆l , 𝜆r] is indicated by vertical red lines and noted together with the binsize Δ𝜆 in the boxes. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Temperature dependence of the mobility edge as extracted from the bin-averaged relative eigenmode volume. The zero 𝑇0, highlighted with the red circle, is estimated by extrapolations with (7). Since the scale error is one-to-one correlated for all data points, just the statistical and systematic error is included for fitting. The scale error of the final result 𝑇0 is however denoted in the first bracket and the tota… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

30 extracted references · 15 canonical work pages

[1]

R. Kehr, D. Smith and L. von Smekal,QCD Anderson transition with overlap valence quarks on a twisted-mass sea, Phys. Rev. D109 (2024) 074512 [2304.13617]

work page Pith review arXiv 2024
[2]

P. W. Anderson,Absence of diffusion in certain random lattices, Phys. Rev.109 (1958) 1492

work page 1958
[3]

Anderson Transitions

F.EversandA.D.Mirlin, Andersontransitions,Rev.Mod.Phys. 80(2008)1355[ 0707.4378]

work page Pith review arXiv 2008
[4]

Giordano and T

M. Giordano and T. G. Kovács,Localization of Dirac Fermions in Finite-Temperature Gauge Theory, Universe7 (2021) 194 [2104.14388]

work page arXiv 2021
[5]

The Anderson transition in QCD with $N_f=2+1+1$ twisted mass quarks: overlap analysis

L. Holicki, E.-M. Ilgenfritz and L. von Smekal,The Anderson transition in QCD with 𝑁 𝑓 = 2+ 1+ 1 twisted mass quarks: overlap analysis, PoS LATTICE2018 (2018) 180, [1810.01130]

work page Pith review arXiv 2018
[6]

T. G. Kovács and R. Á. Vig,The localization transition in SU(3) gauge theory, Phys. Rev.97 (2018) 014502 [1706.03562]. 8 QCD Anderson transition with overlap valence quarks on a twisted-mass sea – an updateRobin Kehr

work page Pith review arXiv 2018
[7]

Dirac eigenmodes at the QCD Anderson transition

M. Giordano, T. Kovács, F. Pittler, L. Ujfalusi and I. Varga,Dirac eigenmodes at the QCD Anderson transition, PoSLATTICE2014(2014) 212 [1410.8308]

work page Pith review arXiv 2014
[8]

Localisation of Dirac modes in gauge theories and Goldstone's theorem at finite temperature

M. Giordano,Localisation of Dirac modes in gauge theories and Goldstone’s theorem at finite temperature, JHEP12(2022) 103 [2206.11109]

work page Pith review arXiv 2022

Show all 30 references

[9]

Banks and A

T. Banks and A. Casher,Chiral Symmetry Breaking in Confining Theories, Nucl. Phys. B169 (1980) 103

1980
[10]

Neuberger, Exactly massless quarks on the lattice, Phys

H. Neuberger, Exactly massless quarks on the lattice, Phys. Lett. B 417 (1998) 141 [hep-lat/9707022]

1998 arXiv
[11]

P. H. Ginsparg and K. G. Wilson,A Remnant of Chiral Symmetry on the Lattice, Phys. Rev. D 25 (1982) 2649

1982
[12]

Cichy, V

K. Cichy, V. Drach, E. García-Ramos, G. Herdoíza and K. Jansen,Overlap valence quarks on a twisted mass sea: a case study for mixed action Lattice QCD, Nucl. Phys. B869 (2013) 131, [1211.1605]

2013 arXiv
[13]

J. E. Román, C. Campos, L. Dalcin, E. Romero and A. Tomás,SLEPc Users Manual: Scalable Library for Eigenvalue Problem Computations, (2021)

2021
[14]

Werner et al.,Hadron-Hadron Interactions from𝑁 𝑓 = 2+ 1+ 1 Lattice QCD: The 𝜌-resonance, Eur

M. Werner et al.,Hadron-Hadron Interactions from𝑁 𝑓 = 2+ 1+ 1 Lattice QCD: The 𝜌-resonance, Eur. Phys. J. A56(2020) 61 [1907.01237]

2020 arXiv
[15]

A. Y. Kotov, M. P. Lombardo and A. Trunin,QCD transition at the physical point, and its scaling window from twisted mass Wilson fermions, Phys. Lett. B823 (2021) 136749 [2105.09842]

2021 arXiv
[16]

Alexandrou, V

C. Alexandrou, V. Drach, K. Jansen, C. Kallidonis and G. Koutsou,Baryon spectrum with 𝑁 𝑓 = 2+ 1+ 1 twisted mass fermions, Phys. Rev. D90 (2014) 074501 [1406.4310]

2014 arXiv
[17]

Burger, E.-M

F. Burger, E.-M. Ilgenfritz, M. P. Lombardo and A. Trunin,Chiral observables and topology in hot QCD with two families of quarks, Phys. Rev. D98(2018) 094501 [1805.06001]

2018 arXiv
[18]

Ding et al.,Chiral Phase Transition Temperature in (2+ 1)-Flavor QCD, Phys

H.-T. Ding et al.,Chiral Phase Transition Temperature in (2+ 1)-Flavor QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 (2019) 062002 [1903.04801]

2019 arXiv
[19]

Alexandru and I

A. Alexandru and I. Horváth,Unusual Features of QCD Low-Energy Modes in the Infrared Phase, Phys. Rev. Lett.127 (2021) 052303 [2103.05607]

2021 arXiv
[20]

Alexandru, I

A. Alexandru, I. Horváth and N. Bhattacharyya,Localized modes in the IR phase of QCD, Phys. Rev. D109 (2024) 014501 [2310.03621]

2024 arXiv
[21]

Ujfalusi and I

L. Ujfalusi and I. Varga,Finite-size scaling and multifractality at the Anderson transition for the three Wigner-Dyson symmetry classes in three dimensions, Phys. Rev. B91 (2015) 184206 [1501.02147]. 9 QCD Anderson transition with overlap valence quarks on a twisted-mass sea –...

2015 arXiv
[22]

Baranka, and M

G. Baranka, and M. Giordano,Localization of Dirac modes in the SU(2) Higgs model at finite temperature, Phys. Rev. D108 (2023) 114508 [2310.03542]

2023 arXiv
[23]

A. Y. Kotov, M. P. Lombardo and A. Trunin,Finite temperature QCD with𝑁 𝑓 = 2+ 1+ 1 Wilson twisted mass fermions at physical pion, strange and charm masses, Eur. Phys. J. A56 (2020) 203 [2004.07122]

2020 arXiv
[24]

Alexandrou, S

C. Alexandrou, S. Bacchio, M. Constantinou, J. Finkenrath, K. Hadjiyiannakou, K. Jansen, G. Koutsou and A. Vaquero Aviles-Casco,Proton and neutron electromagnetic form factors from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D100 (2019) 014509 [1812.10311]

2019 arXiv
[25]

Alexandrou et al.,Simulating twisted mass fermions at physical light, strange and charm quark masses, Phys

C. Alexandrou et al.,Simulating twisted mass fermions at physical light, strange and charm quark masses, Phys. Rev. D98 (2018) 054518 [1807.00495]

2018 arXiv
[26]

Lüscher,Properties and uses of the Wilson flow in lattice QCD, JHEP2010 (2010) 071 [1006.4518]

M. Lüscher,Properties and uses of the Wilson flow in lattice QCD, JHEP2010 (2010) 071 [1006.4518]

2010 arXiv
[27]

Brannick, A

J. Brannick, A. Frommer, K. Kahl, B. Leder, M. Rottmann and A. Strebel,Multigrid Preconditioning for the Overlap Operator in Lattice QCD, Numer. Math.132 (2016) 463 [1410.7170]

2016 arXiv
[28]

A.Frommer,G.Ramirez-Hidalgo,M.SchweitzerandM.Tsolakis, PolynomialPreconditioning for the Action of the Matrix Square Root and Inverse Square Root, Electronic Transactions on Numerical Analysis60(2024) 381 [2401.06684]

2024 arXiv
[29]

G. S. Bali, F. Bruckmann, G. Endrődi, Z. Fodor, S. D. Katz, S. Krieg, A. Schäfer and K. K. Szabó,The QCD phase diagram for external magnetic fields, JHEP2012 (2012) 044 [1111.4956]

2012 arXiv
[30]

Bruckmann, G

F. Bruckmann, G. Endrődi and T. G. Kovács,Inverse magnetic catalysis and the Polyakov loop, JHEP 2013 (2013) 112 [1303.3972]. 10

2013 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

R. Kehr, D. Smith and L. von Smekal,QCD Anderson transition with overlap valence quarks on a twisted-mass sea, Phys. Rev. D109 (2024) 074512 [2304.13617]

work page Pith review arXiv 2024

[2] [2]

P. W. Anderson,Absence of diffusion in certain random lattices, Phys. Rev.109 (1958) 1492

work page 1958

[3] [3]

Anderson Transitions

F.EversandA.D.Mirlin, Andersontransitions,Rev.Mod.Phys. 80(2008)1355[ 0707.4378]

work page Pith review arXiv 2008

[4] [4]

Giordano and T

M. Giordano and T. G. Kovács,Localization of Dirac Fermions in Finite-Temperature Gauge Theory, Universe7 (2021) 194 [2104.14388]

work page arXiv 2021

[5] [5]

The Anderson transition in QCD with $N_f=2+1+1$ twisted mass quarks: overlap analysis

L. Holicki, E.-M. Ilgenfritz and L. von Smekal,The Anderson transition in QCD with 𝑁 𝑓 = 2+ 1+ 1 twisted mass quarks: overlap analysis, PoS LATTICE2018 (2018) 180, [1810.01130]

work page Pith review arXiv 2018

[6] [6]

T. G. Kovács and R. Á. Vig,The localization transition in SU(3) gauge theory, Phys. Rev.97 (2018) 014502 [1706.03562]. 8 QCD Anderson transition with overlap valence quarks on a twisted-mass sea – an updateRobin Kehr

work page Pith review arXiv 2018

[7] [7]

Dirac eigenmodes at the QCD Anderson transition

M. Giordano, T. Kovács, F. Pittler, L. Ujfalusi and I. Varga,Dirac eigenmodes at the QCD Anderson transition, PoSLATTICE2014(2014) 212 [1410.8308]

work page Pith review arXiv 2014

[8] [8]

Localisation of Dirac modes in gauge theories and Goldstone's theorem at finite temperature

M. Giordano,Localisation of Dirac modes in gauge theories and Goldstone’s theorem at finite temperature, JHEP12(2022) 103 [2206.11109]

work page Pith review arXiv 2022