Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 7 minor 86 references

Topological superconductivity in hourglass Dirac chain metals (Ti, Hf)IrGe

T0 review · 3 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read TiIrGe and HfIrGe combine bulk s-wave superconductivity with nonsymmorphic hourglass topology and helical Fermi-level surface states, making them prime candidates for topological superconductivity.

desk verdict Solid muSR/thermodynamic study of two superconductors, but the 'ideal topological platform' claim rests on an unshown Z2 calculation; needs either the invariant or tempered claims. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.07475 v1 pith:3AI3YVAA submitted 2025-02-11 cond-mat.supr-con

Pavan Kumar Meena , Dibyendu Samanta , Sonika Jangid , Roshan Kumar Kushwaha , Rhea Stewart , Adrian D. Hillier , Sudeep Kumar Ghosh , Ravi Prakash Singh This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.supr-con
keywords topologicalsuperconductivityhourglassDiracchainnonsymmorphicglidemirrorTiIrGeHfmuonspinrotations-wavesuperconductorZ2invariant
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the ternary germanides TiIrGe and HfIrGe combine two properties that are rarely found in one stoichiometric crystal: conventional bulk superconductivity and symmetry-protected topological surface states at the Fermi level. Muon-spin rotation, magnetization, resistivity, and specific heat measurements show fully gapped, time-reversal-preserving type-II s-wave superconductivity with transition temperatures of 2.24(5) K and 5.64(4) K. First-principles band-structure calculations predict hourglass-shaped bulk dispersions whose necks form a Dirac chain, a ring of fourfold-degenerate Dirac points protected by a nonsymmorphic glide mirror, together with a nontrivial Z2 invariant that produces helical Dirac surface states crossing the Fermi level. If these calculations are right, the bulk condensate can open a superconducting gap on the topological surface states directly, without doping, interfaces, or heterostructure engineering.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the nonsymmorphic glide mirror symmetry Gx: (x, y, z) -> (-x + 1/2, y + 1/2, z + 1/2) and its enforced eigenvalue redistribution along the S-R path. Because $Gx^{2}$ = $e^{{-ikz}}$ on that path, the glide eigenvalues change from +-1 at S to +-i at R, forcing a band crossing that appears as an hourglass dispersion; the neck points of these hourglasses close into a Dirac ring, the Dirac chain, around S in the kx = pi plane. A second ingredient is the Z2 = 1 invariant computed on the ky = 0 plane, the only plane where a gap exists, which produces helical Dirac surface states. The argument combines symmetry analysis with tight-binding interpolation of first-principles bands, and matches the gap symmetry from specific heat and muon-spin rotation data.

What would settle it

Angle-resolved photoemission on the (010) surface of a single crystal that finds no spin-textured surface state crossing the Fermi level at the predicted energy, or a Wilson-loop calculation on the ky = 0 plane that yields Z2 = 0 instead of 1, would falsify the central claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that MIrGe (M = Ti, Hf) are prime candidates for topological superconductivity: they are conventional, fully gapped, weak-coupling type-II superconductors with Tc = 2.24(5) K for TiIrGe and 5.64(4) K for HfIrGe, isotropic s-wave gaps, and no time-reversal symmetry breaking. In the normal state, DFT calculations including spin-orbit coupling reveal nonsymmorphic glide-mirror-protected hourglass dispersions whose necks form a continuous Dirac chain, a ring of fourfold-degenerate Dirac points in the kx = pi plane, which generates drumhead-like surface states. A Z2 = 1 invariant on the ky = 0 plane yields isolated Dirac surface states with helical spin texture on the (010) surface, well separated from bulk states and crossing the Fermi level. The paper concludes that the coexistence of the bulk s-wave gap with these helical topological surface states makes the compounds a stoichiometric platform for proximity-induced topological superconductivity and potentially Majorana physics, with the topological features verifiable by ARPES or STM/STS.

Load-bearing premise

The key unproven step is that the ky = 0 plane of the Brillouin zone is fully gapped with a nontrivial index and that the calculated Fermi energy places the helical surface states exactly at the Fermi level; the paper asserts both but shows neither the plane's gap nor the invariant's explicit calculation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • ARPES and STM/STS should observe the predicted hourglass dispersions along S-X, S-R, and S-K, together with drumhead surface states where the Dirac chain projects onto the (100) surface.
  • The helical Z2 surface states crossing the Fermi level should acquire a proximity-induced superconducting gap from the bulk s-wave condensate, appearing as a distinct surface gap in Andreev reflection or tunneling spectroscopy.
  • Because the topological surface states are intrinsic to the stoichiometric crystal, the platform avoids the doping- and interface-related fragility of earlier Bi2Se3- and SnTe-based proposals.
  • The phonon calculation gives Tc values of 2.71 K for TiIrGe and 5.08 K for HfIrGe, close to the measured values, supporting the conventional electron-phonon pairing picture used in the argument.
  • Ginzburg-Landau symmetry analysis says all superconducting order parameters except the fully symmetric A1 s-wave channel have nodes, so a signature of nodal pairing would point away from the conventional s-wave scenario established here.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: a Wilson-loop or parity-eigenvalue calculation on the ky = 0 plane, which the paper does not show, would settle whether the Z2 = 1 assignment is genuine; the text currently states the index without displaying the calculation.
  • Beyond the paper: if the predicted surface gap appears, planar Josephson junctions or point-contact spectroscopy on these compounds could look for zero-bias conductance peaks or fractional Josephson signatures as the decisive Majorana evidence, a step the paper mentions only as a long-term possibility.
  • Beyond the paper: the same nonsymmorphic symmetry data suggest that isostructural sister compounds, such as ZrIrGe, would also host hourglass Dirac chains, turning MIrGe into a family-level platform rather than a two-material exception.
  • Beyond the paper: the muon-derived penetration-depth discrepancy for HfIrGe hints that vortex-state and Meissner-state measurements may be probing different effective parameters; a small-angle neutron scattering or tunnel-diode resonator measurement could resolve the origin.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 7 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a combined experimental and first-principles study of the ternary germanides TiIrGe and HfIrGe (orthorhombic TiNiSi-type, space group Pnma). Resistivity, magnetization, and specific heat measurements establish bulk type-II superconductivity with Tc = 2.24(5) K (TiIrGe) and 5.64(4) K (HfIrGe); transverse-field muSR is consistent with a fully gapped s-wave response with penetration depths of about 273 and 246 nm, and zero-field muSR finds no spontaneous magnetic field, ruling out time-reversal-symmetry breaking in the superconducting state. DFT (PBE) calculations predict glide-mirror-protected hourglass dispersions along S-X, S-R, and S-K with a Dirac ring around the S point in the kx = pi plane, drumhead surface states, and a claimed Z2 = 1 invariant on the ky = 0 plane that yields helical surface states crossing the Fermi level. The authors conclude that the coexistence of conventional bulk s-wave superconductivity with these topological surface states makes MIrGe an ideal stoichiometric platform for proximity-induced topological superconductivity. The paper explicitly acknowledges the absence of a global bulk gap and the reliance on the plane-restricted Z2 definition.

Significance. If the topological predictions hold, the paper identifies a rare materials class in which a conventional, fully gapped bulk superconductor coexists with nonsymmorphic-protected hourglass Dirac-chain topology and helical spin-textured surface states, making these compounds attractive stoichiometric candidates for proximity-based topological superconductivity. The experimental half is a genuine strength: bulk superconductivity is established by four independent probes, the muSR analysis follows standard protocols, the ZF-muSR measurement addresses TRS breaking directly, and the McMillan-based Tc estimate (2.71 K and 5.08 K with mu* = 0.10) agrees closely with experiment without tuning. The hourglass symmetry argument is explicit and checkable. The main evidentiary weakness is that the topological half is purely predictive: no ARPES or STM data test the surface states, so the weight of the central claim rests entirely on the completeness of the DFT analysis, which is presently incomplete in the specific ways detailed below.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 2, Topology of electronic band structure; SM, Band structure and topology] The Z2 = 1 claim for the ky = 0 plane is load-bearing for the paper's central conclusion, but it is asserted rather than demonstrated. The manuscript states that MIrGe has no global gap with SOC and that Z2 is 'well-defined on the ky = 0 plane,' yet it does not show the band structure restricted to that plane, does not establish that the plane is gapped at the Fermi energy, and provides no Wilson loop or parity eigenvalues at the four time-reversal-invariant momenta in that plane. The only surface-state evidence offered is Fig. S5a for HfIrGe, with no equivalent spectrum for TiIrGe. A plane-restricted Z2 index is only meaningful if that plane is insulating, so this missing check is not cosmetic; without it, the helical-surface-state claim and the 'prime candidates for topological superconductivity' conclusion do not follow.
  2. [Sec. 2, Fig. 3 and SM Fig. S5] The position of the predicted surface states relative to the Fermi level is not robustly established. The drumhead states are reported at -0.138 eV (TiIrGe) and -0.130 eV (HfIrGe), and the helical-state constant-energy contour is shown at -0.090 eV (Fig. S5b), yet the abstract and conclusions assert that the helical surface states 'disperse across the Fermi level.' These energies lie within the typical tens-of-meV accuracy of PBE band fillings; no rigid chemical-potential shift, alternative exchange-correlation functional, or Hubbard-U check is provided, and no experimental ARPES comparison exists. The authors should either supply such a sensitivity analysis or qualify the 'ideal platform' claim proportionately.
  3. [Sec. 2, Muon spin rotation and relaxation; SM, Specific heat] The main text and the SM disagree on the reliability of the TiIrGe specific-heat gap fit. The main text says the electronic specific heat is 'well fitted with the fully gapped weak-coupling BCS model' and quotes Delta/kBTc = 1.47(2), whereas the SM states that for TiIrGe 'the fitting ... is not determined accurately due to insufficient data points at low temperatures.' The quantitative agreement between methods is also loose: the specific-heat ratios are 1.47(2) and 2.04(2), while the muSR ratios are 1.66(7) and 1.68(2), and the discrepancies are not discussed. The s-wave full-gap conclusion is probably correct, but the main text should carry the SM caveat and the spread of gap values should be reconciled or explicitly discussed.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Sec. 3, Discussions] The printed McMillan formula, Tc = omega_log 1.2 exp[...], is missing the division sign; the standard Allen-Dynes form is Tc = (omega_log/1.2) exp[...].
  2. [Sec. 2, Electronic band structure] The sentence describing SOC-induced splittings cites Figure 1d,e, but those panels are the without-SOC band structures; the with-SOC panels are Figure 1h,i.
  3. [Sec. 2, Muon spin rotation and relaxation] For HfIrGe the quoted Delta(0) = 0.75(2) meV together with Tc = 5.64(4) K implies Delta(0)/kBTc ~ 1.54, not the reported 1.68(2); this internal inconsistency should be corrected.
  4. [Sec. 2, Critical fields] The two reported upper critical fields for HfIrGe, 1.36(1) T from magnetization and 2.04(1) T from resistivity, differ by roughly 50% and are presented without comment.
  5. [Fig. 3 caption] The label 'Surface Fermi arcs' is imprecise for drumhead surface states of a Dirac ring in a time-reversal-invariant system; suggest 'constant-energy contours of the drumhead surface states.'
  6. [Sec. 2, ZF-muSR] The stated detection limit of 'up to 1 microT' for spontaneous internal fields is not derived; please state how this bound follows from the zero-field depolarization data.
  7. [Sec. 4, Summary and conclusion] The surface-state predictions pertain to specific surfaces, but the measured samples are polycrystalline; a sentence clarifying that single crystals will be required to test the (100)/(010) surface states with ARPES or STM would be helpful.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the gap values are openly fitted parameters, the McMillan Tc estimate uses a fixed empirical mu* rather than the measured Tc, and the topological statements are first-principles DFT results. The paper's weaknesses are evidentiary rather than circular.

full rationale

Walking the claimed derivation chain, the experimental quantities (Tc, Hc1, Hc2, gamma_n, theta_D, lambda_e-ph, and the superconducting gap ratios) are obtained by standard data fits and are reported as fitted parameters, not as predictions derived from the conclusions. The TF-muSR sigma_FLL(T) is fitted with an isotropic BCS s-wave model to extract Delta(0), and the specific-heat gap is likewise fitted with a weak-coupling BCS entropy expression; these are openly model-dependent characterizations, and the SM even flags the TiIrGe specific-heat gap fit as unreliable due to insufficient low-temperature data. The McMillan Tc estimate in the Discussion uses DFT phonon dispersions and alpha^2F with a fixed empirical mu* = 0.10; it does not feed the measured Tc back into the formula, so the close agreement with experiment is an independent consistency check rather than a constructed identity. The Z2=1 invariant and the hourglass/Dirac-chain surface states are computed from a Wannier-based tight-binding Hamiltonian with DFT-PBE inputs; no equation in the paper defines the topology in terms of the measured superconducting parameters or vice versa. Self-citations (e.g., refs. 33-35, 37, 49) appear as comparisons with related compounds or standard symmetry arguments; they are not the load-bearing support for the central claim. The main weakness is that the Z2=1 assertion on the ky=0 plane and the helical surface states crossing the Fermi level are underdocumented (no Wilson loop, parity eigenvalues, or explicit gap check on that plane are shown), and PBE Fermi-level placement is not benchmarked. That is a correctness/robustness concern, not circularity: lacking evidence is not equivalent to deriving the conclusion from its own inputs. Therefore the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard experimental fitting of gap amplitudes and critical fields, on DFT/Wannier band structures that are not validated by spectroscopy, and on a Z2 definition whose validity on a gapless plane is asserted rather than shown. The McMillan Tc calculation uses an empirical mu*, and the gap fits are labeled as fits. No new particles, forces, or conserved quantities are introduced; the hourglass Dirac chain and Dirac ring are band-structure features predicted from known crystal symmetry.

free parameters (4)
  • mu* (Coulomb pseudopotential in McMillan formula) = 0.10 for the Tc estimate; 0.13 for the lambda_e-ph estimate
    Empirical parameter chosen in the typical 0.1 to 0.16 range; the reported agreement of computed Tc (2.71 K and 5.08 K) with experiment depends on this choice.
  • Delta(0) from TF-muSR s-wave fit = 0.30(9) meV (TiIrGe), 0.75(2) meV (HfIrGe)
    Fitted to the temperature-dependent muSR relaxation rate sigma_FLL; this is a standard data fit, not an independent prediction.
  • Delta(0)/kBTc from specific heat = 1.47(2) (TiIrGe), 2.04(2) (HfIrGe)
    Fitted from Cel(T) using the isotropic BCS entropy formula; the SM notes the TiIrGe fit is not accurate due to insufficient low-temperature data.
  • Hc1(0) and Hc2(0) from Ginzburg-Landau fits = Hc1: 5.6(1), 36.4(1) mT; Hc2: 0.68(1)/0.71(1) T (TiIrGe), 1.36(1)/2.04(1) T (HfIrGe)
    Extracted by fitting field-dependent magnetization and resistivity data to GL forms; used to establish type-II superconductivity and to derive lambda_GL and xi_GL.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption DFT within GGA-PBE with PAW pseudopotentials and an 8x10x8 k-mesh accurately describes the low-energy band structure of MIrGe.
    All topological conclusions, including hourglass dispersions, the Dirac ring, and Z2=1, are computed from this DFT/Wannier model; no experimental spectroscopy is presented to validate it.
  • domain assumption Wannier interpolation and WannierTools surface calculations preserve the bulk topology.
    The tight-binding Hamiltonian from MLWFs is used for surface states and nodal loops; the paper does not report convergence tests or interpolation errors.
  • standard math The glide mirror eigenvalue argument is the standard nonsymmorphic hourglass construction from the cited literature.
    The paper invokes this symmetry argument to guarantee hourglass dispersions along S-X, S-R, and S-K paths; this is accepted group theory.
  • ad hoc to paper Z2 is well-defined on the ky=0 plane despite the absence of a global gap.
    The paper asserts this without showing that the ky=0 plane is fully gapped or providing the Wilson loop or parity computation; this is load-bearing for the helical surface state claim.
  • domain assumption Phonon-mediated s-wave pairing with a screened Coulomb mu* describes superconductivity in these compounds.
    Used for the McMillan Tc and lambda_e-ph estimates; mu* is an empirical input, and the conventional superconductivity conclusion depends on this model.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Topological superconductivity in hourglass Dirac chain metals (Ti, Hf)IrGe." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3AI3YVAA

@misc{pith2026250207475,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Topological superconductivity in hourglass Dirac chain metals (Ti, Hf)IrGe},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3AI3YVAA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.07475}
}
abstract

Realizing topological superconductivity in stoichiometric materials is a key challenge in condensed matter physics. Here, we report the discovery of ternary germanide superconductors, $M$IrGe ($M$ = Ti, Hf), as prime candidates for topological superconductivity, predicted to exhibit nonsymmorphic symmetry-protected hourglass Dirac chains. Using comprehensive thermodynamic and muon-spin rotation/relaxation ($\mu$SR) measurements, we establish these materials as conventional bulk type-II superconductors with transition temperatures of 2.24(5) K for TiIrGe and 5.64(4) K for HfIrGe, featuring a full gap and preserved time-reversal symmetry. First-principles calculations reveal striking topological features in $M$IrGe, including hourglass-shaped bulk dispersions and a Dirac chain -- a ring of fourfold-degenerate Dirac points protected by nonsymmorphic symmetry. Each Dirac point corresponds to the neck of the hourglass dispersion, while the Dirac chain gives rise to drumhead-like surface states near the Fermi level. Additionally, nontrivial $\mathbb{Z}_2$ topology leads to isolated Dirac surface states with helical spin textures that disperse across the Fermi level, forming an ideal platform for proximity-induced topological superconductivity. The coexistence of conventional bulk superconductivity, symmetry-protected hourglass topology, and helical spin-textured surface states establishes $M$IrGe as a rare and robust platform to realize topological superconductivity, opening new avenues for next-generation quantum technologies.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

86 extracted references · 63 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    N. P. Armitage, E. J. Mele, and A. Vishwanath, Weyl and dirac semimetals in three-dimensional solids, Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 015001 (2018)

    2018

  2. [2]

    Ong and S

    N. Ong and S. Liang, Experimental signatures of the chi- ral anomaly in dirac–weyl semimetals, Nature Reviews Physics 3, 394 (2021)

    2021

  3. [3]

    B. Q. Lv, T. Qian, and H. Ding, Experimental perspec- tive on three-dimensional topological semimetals, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 025002 (2021)

    2021

  4. [4]

    Wang, B.-C

    S. Wang, B.-C. Lin, A.-Q. Wang, D.-P. Yu, and Z.-M. Liao, Quantum transport in dirac and weyl semimetals: a review, Advances in Physics: X2, 518 (2017)

    2017

  5. [5]

    Z. Wang, A. Alexandradinata, R. J. Cava, and B. A. Bernevig, Hourglass fermions, Nature532, 189 (2016)

    2016

  6. [6]

    Alexandradinata, Z

    A. Alexandradinata, Z. Wang, and B. A. Bernevig, Topo- logical insulators from group cohomology, Phys. Rev. X 6, 021008 (2016)

    2016

  7. [7]

    M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, Colloquium: topological insulators, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 3045 (2010)

    2010

  8. [8]

    Singh, B

    B. Singh, B. Ghosh, C. Su, H. Lin, A. Agarwal, and A. Bansil, Topological hourglass dirac semimetal in the nonpolar phase of Ag 2BiO3, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 226401 (2018)

    work page 2018

Show all 86 references
  1. [9]

    Y. Gao, P. J. Guo, K. Liu, and Z. Y. Lu, RRuB2 (R = Y, Lu), topological superconductor candi- dates with hourglass-type dirac ring, Phys. Rev. B102, 115137 (2020)

    2020

  2. [10]

    S. Li, Y. Liu, S.-S. Wang, Z.-M. Yu, S. Guan, X.-L. Sheng, Y. Yao, and S. A. Yang, Nonsymmorphic- symmetry-protected hourglass dirac loop, nodal line, and dirac point in bulk and monolayer X3SiTe6 (X = Ta, Nb), Phys. Rev. B 97, 045131 (2018)

    2018

  3. [11]

    J. Ma, C. Yi, B. Lv, Z. Wang, S. Nie, L. Wang, L. Kong, Y. Huang, P. Richard, P. Zhang, et al. , Experimental evidence of hourglass fermion in the candidate nonsym- morphic topological insulator KHgSb, Science advances 3, e1602415 (2017)

    2017

  4. [12]

    X. L. Qi and S. C. Zhang, Topological insulators and superconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 1057 (2011)

    2011

  5. [13]

    Nayak, S

    C. Nayak, S. H. Simon, A. Stern, M. Freedman, and S. Das Sarma, Non-abelian anyons and topological quan- tum computation, Rev. Mod. Phys.80, 1083 (2008)

    2008

  6. [14]

    Sato and Y

    M. Sato and Y. Ando, Topological superconductors: a review, Rep. Prog. Phys.80, 076501 (2017)

    2017

  7. [15]

    M. Wang, C. Liu, J. Xu, F. Yang, L. Miao, M. Yao, C. Gao, C. Shen, X. Ma, X. Chen,et al., The coexistence of superconductivity and topological order in the Bi2Se3 thin films, Science336, 52 (2012)

    2012

  8. [16]

    E. Wang, H. Ding, A. V. Fedorov, W. Yao, Z. Li, Y. Lv, K. Zhao, L. Zhang, Z. Xu, J. Schneeloch,et al. , Fully gapped topological surface states in Bi2Se3 films induced by ad-wave high-temperature superconductor, Nature physics 9, 621 (2013)

    2013

  9. [17]

    Kriener, K

    M. Kriener, K. Segawa, Z. Ren, S. Sasaki, and Y. Ando, Bulk superconducting phase with a full energy gap in the doped topological insulator CuxBi2Se3, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 127004 (2011)

    2011

  10. [18]

    Sasaki, M

    S. Sasaki, M. Kriener, K. Segawa, K. Yada, Y. Tanaka, M. Sato, and Y. Ando, Topological superconductivity in CuxBi2Se3, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 217001 (2011)

    2011

  11. [19]

    Sasaki, Z

    S. Sasaki, Z. Ren, A. Taskin, K. Segawa, L. Fu, and Y. Ando, Odd-parity pairing and topological supercon- ductivity in a strongly spin-orbit coupled semiconductor, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 217004 (2012)

    2012

  12. [20]

    B. Yan, M. Jansen, and C. Felser, A large-energy-gap oxide topological insulator based on the superconductor BaBiO3, Nat. Phys.9, 709 (2013)

    2013

  13. [21]

    Guan, P.-J

    S.-Y. Guan, P.-J. Chen, M.-W. Chu, R. Sankar, F. Chou, H.-T. Jeng, C.-S. Chang, and T.-M. Chuang, Super- conducting topological surface states in the noncen- trosymmetric bulk superconductor PbTaSe2, Sci. Adv. 2, e1600894 (2016)

    2016

  14. [22]

    Y. Xing, H. Wang, C. Li, X. Zhang, J. Liu, Y. Zhang, J. Luo, Z. Wang, Y. Wang, L. Ling,et al. , Supercon- ductivity in topologically nontrivial material Au2Pb, npj Quantum Materials1, 1 (2016)

    2016

  15. [23]

    H. Noh, J. Jeong, E. Cho, K. Kim, B. Min, and B. Park, Experimental realization of type-II dirac fermions in a PdTe2 superconductor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 016401 (2017)

    2017

  16. [24]

    Gupta and K

    S. Gupta and K. G. Suresh, Review on magnetic and related properties of RTX compounds, J. Alloys Compd. 618, 562 (2015)

    2015

  17. [25]

    Riabinkin, Crystallographic data of new ternary Co2Si- type RTSi (R = Y, Tb–Tm, T= Mn, Ru) compounds, J

    A.V.Morozkin, Y.D.Seropegin, I.A.Sviridov,andI.G. Riabinkin, Crystallographic data of new ternary Co2Si- type RTSi (R = Y, Tb–Tm, T= Mn, Ru) compounds, J. Alloys Compd.282, L4 (1999)

    1999

  18. [26]

    G. A. Landrum, R. Hoffmann, J. Evers, and H. Boysen, The TiNiSi family of compounds: structure and bonding, Inorg. Chem.37, 5754 (1998). 9

    1998

  19. [27]

    Welter, G

    R. Welter, G. Venturini, B. Malaman, and E. Ressouche, Crystallographic data and mag- netic properties of new RTX compounds (R = La–Sm, Gd; T = Ru, Os; X = Si, Ge). mag- netic structure of NdRuSi, J. Alloys Compd.202, 165 (1993)

    1993

  20. [28]

    G. V. Subba Rao, K. Wagner, G. Balakrishnan, J. Janaki, W. Paulus, R. Schöllhorn, V. S. Subramanian, and U. Poppe, Structure and superconductivity studies on ternary equiatomic silicides, MM′Si, Bull. Mater. Sci. 7, 215 (1985)

    1985

  21. [29]

    Shang, S

    T. Shang, S. K. Ghosh, M. Smidman, D. J. Gawryluk, C. Baines, A. Wang, W. Xie, Y. Chen, M. O. Ajeesh, M. Nicklas, et al., Spin-triplet superconductivity in weyl nodal-line semimetals, npj Quantum Mater.7, 35 (2022)

    2022

  22. [30]

    S. K. P., D. Singh, P. K. Biswas, A. D. Hillier, and R. P. Singh, Superconducting properties of the noncentrosym- metric superconductor LaPtGe, Phys. Rev. B98, 214505 (2018)

    2018

  23. [31]

    S. K. P., D. Singh, A. D. Hillier, and R. P. Singh, Probing nodeless superconductivity in LaMSi (M= Ni, Pt) using muon-spin rotation and relaxation, Phys. Rev. B102, 094515 (2020)

    2020

  24. [32]

    D. Tay, T. Shang, P. F. S. Rosa, F. B. Santos, J. D. Thompson, Z. Fisk, H. R. Ott, and T. Shiroka, Nodeless superconductivity in the noncentrosymmetric compound ThIrSi, Phys. Rev. B107, 064507 (2023)

    2023

  25. [33]

    S. K. Ghosh, P. K. Biswas, C. Xu, B. Li, J. Z. Zhao, A. D. Hillier, and X. Xu, Time-reversal symmetry breaking su- perconductivity in three-dimensional dirac semimetallic silicides, Phys. Rev. Res.4, L012031 (2022)

    2022

  26. [34]

    Panda, A

    K. Panda, A. Bhattacharyya, D. T. Adroja, N. Kase, P. K. Biswas, S. Saha, T. Das, M. R. Lees, and A. D. Hillier, Probing the superconducting ground state of ZrIrSi: A muon spin rotation and relaxation study, Phys. Rev. B99, 174513 (2019)

    2019

  27. [35]

    Bhattacharyya, K

    A. Bhattacharyya, K. Panda, D. T. Adroja, N. Kase, P. K. Biswas, S. Saha, T. Das, M. R. Lees, and A. D. Hillier, Investigation of superconducting gap structure in HfIrSi using muon spin relaxation/rotation, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter32, 085601 (2019)

    2019

  28. [36]

    H. Y. Uzunok, S. Baˇ gc ı, E. c. v. Karaca, H. M. Tütüncü, and G. P. Srivastava, First-principles calcu- lations of physical properties and superconductivity of orthorhombic ScRuSi and ZrRhSi, Phys. Rev. B 102, 134508 (2020)

    2020

  29. [37]

    Panda, A

    K. Panda, A. Bhattacharyya, P. N. Ferreira, R. Mondal, A. Thamizhavel, D. T. Adroja, C. Heil, L. T. F. Eleno, andA.D.Hillier,Probingthesuperconductinggapstruc- ture of ScRuSi viaµSR and first-principles calculations, Phys. Rev. B109, 224517 (2024)

    2024

  30. [39]

    Hattori, Y

    T. Hattori, Y. Ihara, Y. Nakai, K. Ishida, Y. Tada, S. Fu- jimoto, N. Kawakami, E. Osaki, K. Deguchi, N. K. Sato, et al., Superconductivity induced by longitudinal ferro- magnetic fluctuations in UCoGe, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 066403 (2012)

    2012

  31. [40]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  32. [41]

    Z. F. Weng, J. L. Zhang, M. Smidman, T. Shang, J. Quintanilla, J. F. Annett, M. Nicklas, G. M. Pang, L. Jiao, W. B. Jiang, Y. Chen, F. Steglich, and H. Q. Yuan, Two-gap superconductivity in LaNiGa2 with nonunitary triplet pairing and even parity gap symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett.1...

    2016

  33. [42]

    A. D. Hillier, S. J. Blundell, I. McKenzie, I. Umegaki, L. Shu, J. A. Wright, T. Prokscha, F. Bert, K. Shimo- mura, A. Berlie, et al. , Muon spin spectroscopy, Nat. Rev. Methods Primers2, 4 (2022)

    2022

  34. [43]

    Weber, A

    M. Weber, A. Amato, F. N. Gygax, A. Schenck, H. Maletta, V. N. Duginov, V. G. Grebinnik, A. B. Lazarev, V. G. Olshevsky, V. Y. Pomjakushin, et al. , Magnetic-flux distribution and the magnetic penetration depth in superconducting polycrystalline Bi2Sr2Ca1−xYxCu2O8+δ and Bi2−xP...

    1993

  35. [44]

    Maisuradze, R

    A. Maisuradze, R. Khasanov, A. Shengelaya, and H. Keller, Comparison of different methods for analyzing µSR line shapes in the vortex state of type-II supercon- ductors, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter21, 075701 (2009)

    2009

  36. [45]

    Prozorov and R

    R. Prozorov and R. W. Giannetta, Magnetic penetra- tion depth in unconventional superconductors, Super- cond. Sci. Technol.19, R41 (2006)

    2006

  37. [46]

    Anand, D

    V. Anand, D. Adroja, M. R. Lees, P. Biswas, A. Hillier, and B. Lake, Superconductivity in Ru0.55Rh0.45P and Ru0.75Rh0.25As probed by muon spin relaxation and ro- tation measurements, Phys. Rev. B98, 214517 (2018)

    2018

  38. [47]

    Mandal, C

    M. Mandal, C. Patra, A. Kataria, D. Singh, P. Biswas, J. Lord, A. Hillier, and R. Singh, Superconducting ground state of the nonsymmorphic superconducting compound Zr2Ir, Phys. Rev. B104, 054509 (2021)

    2021

  39. [48]

    Kataria, Arushi, S

    A. Kataria, Arushi, S. Sharma, T. Agarwal, M. Pula, J. Beare, S. Yoon, Y. Cai, K. Kojima, G. Luke,et al., Su- perconducting ground state study of the valence-skipped compound AgSnSe2, Phys. Rev. B107, 174517 (2023)

    2023

  40. [49]

    S. K. Ghosh, M. Smidman, T. Shang, J. F. Annett, A. D. Hillier, J. Quintanilla, and H. Yuan, Recent progress on superconductors with time-reversal symmetry breaking, J. Phys. Condens. Matter33, 033001 (2020)

    2020

  41. [50]

    A. D. Hillier, J. Quintanilla, B. Mazidian, J. F. Annett, and R. Cywinski, Nonunitary triplet pairing in the cen- trosymmetric superconductor LaNiGa2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 097001 (2012)

    2012

  42. [51]

    Sumita and Y

    S. Sumita and Y. Yanase, Unconventional superconduct- ing gap structure protected by space group symmetry, Phys. Rev. B97, 134512 (2018)

    2018

  43. [52]

    P. B. Allen and R. C. Dynes, Transition temperature of strong-coupled superconductors reanalyzed, Phys. Rev. B 12, 905 (1975)

    1975

  44. [54]

    P. B. Allen, Neutron spectroscopy of superconductors, Phys. Rev. B6, 2577 (1972)

    1972

  45. [55]

    Morel and P

    P. Morel and P. W. Anderson, Calculation of the su- perconducting state parameters with retarded electron- phonon interaction, Phys. Rev.125, 1263 (1962)

    1962

  46. [56]

    N. S. Mehta, B. Patra, M. Garg, G. Mohmad, M. Mon- ish, P. Bhardwaj, P. K. Meena, K. Motla, R. P. Singh, B. Singh, et al. , Topological surface states host super- conductivity induced by the bulk condensate in YRuB2, Phys. Rev. B109, L241104 (2024)

    2024

  47. [57]

    X. P. Yang, Y. Zhong, S. Mardanya, T. A. Cochran, R. Chapai, A. Mine, J. Zhang, J. Sánchez-Barriga, Z.-J. Cheng, O.J.Clark, J.-X.Yin, J.Blawat, G.Cheng, I.Be- 10 lopolski, T. Nagashima, S. Najafzadeh, S. Gao, N. Yao, A. Bansil, R. Jin, T.-R. Chang, S. Shin, K. Okazaki, and M. ...

    2023

  48. [58]

    H. Chen, J. Gao, L. Chen, G. Wang, H. Li, Y. Wang, J. Liu, J. Wang, D. Geng, Q. Zhang, J. Sheng, F. Ye, T. Qian, L. Chen, H. Weng, J. Ma, and X. Chen, Topo- logical crystalline insulator candidate ErAsS with hour- glassfermionandmagnetic-tunedtopologicalphasetran- sition, Adva...

    2022

  49. [59]

    Eschrig, Spin-polarized supercurrents for spintronics: a review of current progress, Rep

    M. Eschrig, Spin-polarized supercurrents for spintronics: a review of current progress, Rep. Prog. Phys.78, 104501 (2015)

    2015

  50. [60]

    Parhizgar and A

    F. Parhizgar and A. M. Black-Schaffer, Large joseph- son current in weyl nodal loop semimetals due to odd- frequency superconductivity, npj Quantum Materials5, 42 (2020)

    2020

  51. [61]

    Cayao and M

    J. Cayao and M. Sato, Non-hermitian phase-biased josephson junctions, Phys. Rev. B110, L201403 (2024)

    2024

  52. [62]

    P.-X.Shen, Z.Lu, J.L.Lado,andM.Trif,Non-hermitian fermi-dirac distribution in persistent current transport, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 086301 (2024)

    2024

  53. [63]

    A. A. Burkov, M. D. Hook, and L. Balents, Topological nodal semimetals, Phys. Rev. B84, 235126 (2011)

    2011

  54. [64]

    Mullen, B

    K. Mullen, B. Uchoa, and D. T. Glatzhofer, Line of dirac nodes in hyperhoneycomb lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 026403 (2015)

    2015

  55. [65]

    R. Yu, Z. Fang, X. Dai, and H. Weng, Topological nodal line semimetals predicted from first-principles calcula- tions, Front. Phys.12, 1 (2017)

    2017

  56. [66]

    Rhim and Y

    J.-W. Rhim and Y. B. Kim, Landau level quantization and almost flat modes in three-dimensional semimetals with nodal ring spectra, Phys. Rev. B92, 045126 (2015)

    2015

  57. [67]

    S. Ahn, E. J. Mele, and H. Min, Electrodynamics on fermi cyclides in nodal line semimetals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 147402 (2017)

    2017

  58. [68]

    Y. Liu, S. A. Yang, and F. Zhang, Circular dichroism and radial hall effects in topological materials, Phys. Rev. B 97, 035153 (2018)

    2018

  59. [69]

    Stewart et al

    R. Stewart et al. , µSR study in su- perconducting state of nonsymmorphic compounds TIrGe (T = Ti, Zr, and Hf), STFC ISIS Neutron and Muon Source (2023), https://doi.org/10.5286/ISIS.E.RB2310137-1 (2023)

    2023 doi

  60. [70]

    Rodríguez-Carvajal, Recent advances in magnetic structure determination by neutron powder diffraction, Physica B.192, 55 (1993)

    J. Rodríguez-Carvajal, Recent advances in magnetic structure determination by neutron powder diffraction, Physica B.192, 55 (1993)

    1993

  61. [71]

    X. Z. Wang, B. Chevalier, J. Etourneau, and P. Hagenmuller, Crystal structure and super- conductivity of new ternary mtge germanides (M = Ti, Zr, Hf and T= Ru, Os, Rh, Ir), Mater. Res. Bull. 22, 331 (1987)

    1987

  62. [72]

    Wiesmann, M

    H. Wiesmann, M. Gurvitch, H. Lutz, A. Ghosh, B. Schwarz, M. Strongin, P. B. Allen, and J. W. Hal- ley, Simple model for characterizing the electrical resis- tivity in A-15 superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett.38, 782 (1977)

    1977

  63. [73]

    Fisk and G

    Z. Fisk and G. W. Webb, Saturation of the high- temperature normal-state electrical resistivity of super- conductors, Phys. Rev. Lett.36, 1084 (1976)

    1976

  64. [74]

    Grimvall, The electron-phonon interaction in metals (1981)

    G. Grimvall, The electron-phonon interaction in metals (1981)

    1981

  65. [75]

    N. Kase, H. Suzuki, T. Nakano, and N. Takeda, Superconductivity in the ternary silicide TrIrSi (Tr= Ti, Zr, and Hf), Supercond. Sci. Tech- nol. 29, 035011 (2016)

    2016

  66. [76]

    N. R. Werthamer, E. F. Helfand, and P. C. Hohenberg, Temperature and purity dependence of the supercon- ducting critical field, H c2. III. electron spin and spin- orbit effects, Phys. Rev.147, 295 (1966)

    1966

  67. [77]

    Helfand and N

    E. Helfand and N. R. Werthamer, Temperature and pu- rity dependence of the superconducting critical field, Hc2. II, Phys. Rev.147, 288 (1966)

    1966

  68. [78]

    B. S. Chandrasekhar, A note on the maximum critical field of high-field superconductors, Appl. Phys. Letters1 (1962)

    1962

  69. [79]

    A. M. Clogston, Upper limit for the critical field in hard superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett.9, 266 (1962)

    1962

  70. [80]

    Maki, Effect of pauli paramagnetism on magnetic properties of high-field superconductors, Phys

    K. Maki, Effect of pauli paramagnetism on magnetic properties of high-field superconductors, Phys. Rev.148, 362 (1966)

    1966

  71. [81]

    Tinkham, Introduction to superconductivity , Vol

    M. Tinkham, Introduction to superconductivity , Vol. 1 (Courier Corporation, 2004)

    2004

  72. [82]

    W. L. McMillan, Transition temperature of strong- coupled superconductors, Phys. Rev.167, 331 (1968)

    1968

  73. [83]

    Padamsee, J

    H. Padamsee, J. E. Neighbor, and C. A. Shiffman, Quasi- particle phenomenology for thermodynamics of strong- coupling superconductors, J. Low Temp. Phys.12, 387 (1973)

    1973

  74. [84]

    Motla, P

    Arushi, K. Motla, P. K. Meena, S. Sharma, D. Singh, P. K. Biswas, A. D. Hillier, and R. P. Singh, Micro- scopic investigation of the superconducting properties of the strongly coupled superconductor IrGe viaµSR, Phys. Rev. B105, 054517 (2022)

    2022

  75. [85]

    A. D. Hillier and R. Cywinski, The classification of su- perconductors using muon spin rotation, Appl. Magn. Reson. 13, 95 (1997)

    1997

  76. [86]

    Y. J. Uemura, G. M. Luke, B. J. Sternlieb, J. H. Brewer, J. F. Carolan, W. N. Hardy, R. Kadono, J. R. Kemp- ton, R. F. Kiefl, S. R. Kreitzman,et al., Universal cor- relations between Tc and ns m∗ (carrier density over ef- fective mass) in high-Tc cuprate superconductors, Phys....

    1989

  77. [87]

    Y. J. Uemura, L. P. Le, G. M. Luke, B. J. Sternlieb, W. D. Wu, J. H. Brewer, T. M. Riseman, C. L. Sea- man, M. B. Maple, M. Ishikawa,et al., Basic similarities among cuprate, bismuthate, organic, chevrel-phase, and heavy-fermion superconductors shown by penetration- depth meas...

    1991

  78. [88]

    Using these parameters and the relation H 2 c .lnκGL = Hc1Hc2, the thermodynamics critical magnetic field value Hc of 38.7(3) and 166.6(2) mT was estimated for TiIrGe and HfIrGe, respectively. Specific heat:The temperature-dependent specific heat measured in a zero magnetic fi...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.