Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 minor 80 references

Inertia

T0 review · 0 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Intrinsic spin has its own inertia; the paper derives from it a mass-independent force that violates the universality of free fall.

desk verdict A compact, honest synthesis of Mashhoon's own established spin-rotation-gravity program: the physics is sound and standard, the new content is thin, the prediction is unmeasurable, and Eq. (35) has a real factor-of-100 numerical slip. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.07604 v3 pith:W53ZE6M5 submitted 2025-02-10 gr-qc

Bahram Mashhoon This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qc
keywords inertiaofintrinsicspinspin-rotationcouplingspin-gravitygravitomagneticfieldStern-GerlachforceuniversalityfreefallgravitoelectromagnetismLarmortheorem
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to show that inertia is not only a property of mass: intrinsic spin also resists changes of state, and this “inertia of intrinsic spin” shows up as a coupling between spin and rotation. Taking that spin–rotation coupling as physical, the paper transfers it to gravity via the gravitomagnetic field of a rotating mass. The result is a spin-dependent, mass-independent Stern–Gerlach force, which means particles in the same gravitational field do not all fall identically. This violates the universality of free fall, although for a neutron on Earth the predicted effect is only about one part in $10^{30}$, far below current measurement.

What carries the argument

The carrying mechanism is the chain from spin–rotation coupling to spin–gravity coupling. The first link is the Hamiltonian $H_{\rm SR}=-\sigma\cdot\Omega$, encoding the assumption that intrinsic spin holds its direction relative to the local inertial frame and therefore precesses in the opposite sense to a rotating observer. The second link is the gravitational Larmor theorem, $\Omega_L=-\mathbf{B}_g/c$, which identifies the local equivalence between the gravitomagnetic field of a rotating mass and a rotating frame. Combined, these produce the spin–gravity Hamiltonian $H_{\rm SG}=(1/c)\mathbf{S}\cdot\mathbf{B}_g$. The spatial gradient of this Hamiltonian, $-\frac{1}{c}(\mathbf{S}\cdot\nabla)\mathbf{B}_g$, is the gravitomagnetic Stern–Gerlach force, the object that carries the paper's conclusion because it is independent of the particle's mass.

What would settle it

A decisive test would be a free-fall comparison of spin-polarized neutrons: prepare the same neutron state with spin pointing vertically up and then vertically down, and measure the acceleration difference. The paper's Eqs. (31)–(33) predict a fractional weight difference of about $2\epsilon_\oplus\sin\vartheta$, with $\epsilon_\oplus \approx \hbar\Omega_\oplus/(m_n c^2) \approx \frac{1}{2}\times 10^{-30}$; finding no spin-dependent acceleration at that sensitivity would falsify the central claim, while confirming it would demonstrate the mass-independent gravitomagnetic Stern–Gerlach force.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a particle's intrinsic spin contributes to its inertia, and that this contribution has a direct gravitational consequence. The spin–rotation coupling is expressed by the Hamiltonian $H_{\rm SR}=-\sigma\cdot\Omega$; through the gravitational Larmor theorem, which makes the gravitomagnetic field $\mathbf{B}_g$ locally equivalent to a rotation, the same coupling produces a spin–gravity Hamiltonian $H_{\rm SG}=(1/c)\mathbf{S}\cdot\mathbf{B}_g$. Because $\mathbf{B}_g$ varies in space, the particle experiences a gravitomagnetic Stern–Gerlach force $-\frac{1}{c}(\mathbf{S}\cdot\nabla)\mathbf{B}_g$, whose explicit form for a rotating source is given in the paper's Eq. (29). This force does not contain the particle's mass, so it makes the particle's weight depend on spin orientation: a spin-1/2 particle at rest has weight $w = mg - \frac{3}{c|x|}\sigma\cdot\mathbf{B}_g$. Equal masses with different spin states therefore fall at different rates, and free fall is not universal. For a neutron on Earth the fractional spin-dependent weight difference is estimated as $\hbar\Omega_\oplus/(m_n c^2) \approx \frac{1}{2}\times 10^{-30}$.

Load-bearing premise

The argument stands or falls on the assumption that intrinsic spins keep pointing in fixed directions relative to the local inertial frame when their surroundings rotate, so that to a rotating observer they appear to precess in the opposite sense; if spins do not behave that way, the spin–rotation Hamiltonian and everything derived from it loses its foundation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A spin-1/2 particle at rest in the exterior field of a rotating source has weight $w = mg - \frac{3}{c|x|}\sigma\cdot\mathbf{B}_g$, so vertically polarized spin-up and spin-down states fall at slightly different rates.
  • The spin–rotation coupling predicts a rotational Doppler shift $\omega' = \omega \mp \Omega$ for circularly polarized light seen by a rotating observer, and a corresponding energy shift of $\mp 2\hbar\Omega$ when a photon passes through a rotating half-wave plate.
  • Mass and spin enter inertia through separate channels: the gravitoelectric field acts on mass, while the gravitomagnetic field acts on spin, so the inertial properties of a quantum particle are not exhausted by its mass.
  • In the classical correspondence limit, the gravitomagnetic Stern–Gerlach force agrees with the classical spin-curvature force, linking the quantum spin effect to the classical motion of a spinning body in general relativity.
  • The predicted violation of free-fall universality is tiny, about $10^{-30}$ for a neutron, compared with the current experimental bound of $10^{-15}$, so it cannot be observed with present technology.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: because the gravitomagnetic Stern–Gerlach force is linear in spin, a body with N aligned spins would feel a force N times larger; a macroscopically spin-polarized test mass could therefore amplify the predicted violation far above the single-neutron level, even though the paper does not discuss this route.
  • Editorial inference: the same Hamiltonian implies a spin-dependent phase shift for matter waves passing through a region with a gravitomagnetic field gradient; the paper does not compute this, but a matter-wave interferometer around a rotating mass would be a natural setting to search for it.
  • Editorial inference: if spin inertia is correct, the clean statement of the equivalence principle is not that all bodies fall alike, but that all bodies with the same spin state fall alike; future tests could compare spin-polarized and unpolarized test masses, something the paper leaves implicit.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper develops the idea that intrinsic spin contributes to inertia through the spin-rotation Hamiltonian H_SR = −σ·Ω (Eq. 2). Using the gravitational Larmor theorem Ω_L = −B_g/c (Eq. 26), it obtains a spin–gravity Hamiltonian H_SG = S·B_g/c (Eq. 27). The position dependence of B_g yields a gravitomagnetic Stern–Gerlach force (Eqs. 28–29) that is independent of the particle mass, from which the paper concludes that the free fall of spinning particles is not universal. A weight formula for a spin-1/2 particle at rest near the Earth is derived (Eqs. 31–32), and the estimated violation for neutrons is extremely small, many orders of magnitude below current tests (Eq. 35).

Significance. The result, if correct, is a concise and correct demonstration of a known but physically important consequence: intrinsic spin couples to gravitomagnetic fields and produces a mass-independent force. The algebraic chain is internally consistent, contains no fitted parameters, and its key input, the spin-rotation coupling, has independent experimental support (refs. [37–40] and GPS phase wrap-up). The paper is explicit that the effect is unobservable with present technology. Its main value is synthetic and pedagogical rather than novel; the central Hamiltonian (27) and the Stern–Gerlach force (29) have appeared in the author's earlier work, which is properly cited.

minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. V, Eq. (35)] With the values quoted in Sec. III (ℏΩ⊕ ≈ 5×10⁻²⁰ eV and m_n c² ≈ 9.4×10⁸ eV), the ratio ℏΩ⊕/(m_n c²) is ≈ 5×10⁻²⁹, not ≈ 0.5×10⁻³⁰; please correct this factor-100 numerical error. The qualitative conclusion is unaffected.
  2. [Sec. II, Eq. (1)] The precession law is introduced as an assumption. Although the independent experimental and relativistic-quantum references cited in Sec. II.A adequately support it, a brief derivation or an explicit statement that Eq. (1) follows from the cited Dirac-equation results would make the paper more self-contained.
  3. [Sec. III, Eq. (26)] The gravitational Larmor theorem is invoked from the author's earlier work; because the later Hamiltonian (27) is the central bridge between spin-rotation and spin-gravity coupling, a one-line derivation or a non-self-cited textbook reference would strengthen the presentation.
  4. [Sec. V, Eq. (34)] The identification ǫ⊕ ≈ ℏΩ⊕/(mc²) relies on the numerical near-equality 3J⊕/(M⊕R⊕²Ω⊕) ≈ 1; please state this explicitly rather than letting it appear as an exact identity.
  5. [Secs. IV–V] The phrase "violates the universality of free fall" should be qualified; in general relativity the spin-curvature force is a standard effect for non-geodetic spinning test bodies. Suggest rewording to "violates the universality of free fall for the center-of-mass motion of spinning particles" to avoid implying a conflict with the Einstein equivalence principle.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation; the spin-gravity force follows from independently supported spin-rotation coupling and standard GR equivalence.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is not circular. It begins with an explicitly labeled heuristic assumption (Eq. 1) about spin response to rotation, which is independently supported by neutron-interferometry experiments and GPS phase wrap-up. The spin-rotation Hamiltonian (Eq. 2) is then grounded in the rotating-observer energy transformation (Eqs. 5-7), not merely assumed. The key step to gravity (Eqs. 26-27) uses the gravitational Larmor theorem cited to the author's earlier work, but this is a standard, parameter-free GR result whose assumptions (weak field, slow motion) are stated in the paper and whose domain is externally tested by GP-B; it is therefore real evidence, not a self-citation loop. The gravitomagnetic Stern-Gerlach force (Eqs. 28-29) is a direct gradient of the derived Hamiltonian, and the weight formulas (Eqs. 31-33) are calculational consequences rather than fitted or renamed inputs. No parameter is fitted to data, and no prediction is equivalent to an input by construction. The paper does contain a numerical factor error in Eq. (35) (the quoted ratio is ~5e-31, while direct evaluation gives ~5e-29), but that is a typographical/correctness issue, not circularity. The only admitted limitations are the heuristic starting point and the neglect of distant rotating masses; neither makes the central claim reduce to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no free parameters and no new entities. It relies on established GR results, the GEM approximation, and a physical assumption about spin precession in rotating frames. Several key inputs, including the Larmor theorem and the spin-rotation coupling, are drawn from the author's own prior publications.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Intrinsic spin responds to rotation by precessing opposite to the rotation (Eq. 1).
    Stated at the start of Section II: 'We assume that ... the intrinsic spins respond to the rotation of the object by rotating in the opposite sense.' This underlies the spin-rotation Hamiltonian H_SR = -σ·Ω (Eq. 2).
  • domain assumption Gravitational Larmor theorem: the gravitomagnetic field is locally equivalent to a rotation with angular velocity Ω_L = -B_g/c (Eq. 26).
    Invoked in Section III to derive H_SG = S·B_g/c from the spin-rotation Hamiltonian. This theorem is prior work by the author (ref [61]) and is treated as a known result.
  • domain assumption Linearized GEM metric is valid for weak fields and slow motion (Eq. 20).
    Section III confines attention to the weak-field, slow-motion approximation of GR. The paper then uses the GEM potentials (Eqs. 21-22).
  • domain assumption The influence of the gravitomagnetic field of distant rotating masses on local physics can be neglected.
    Stated in Section VI: 'we have assumed that the influence of the gravitomagnetic field of distant rotating masses on local physics can be neglected.' This justifies isolating Earth's field.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Inertia." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/W53ZE6M5

@misc{pith2026250207604,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Inertia},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/W53ZE6M5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.07604}
}
read the original abstract

Inertia of a particle is due to its mass as well as intrinsic spin. The latter is revealed via the coupling of intrinsic spin with rotation. The spin-rotation coupling and the concomitant spin-gravity coupling are discussed in connection with the nature of inertia. The spin-rotation-gravity coupling leads to a gravitomagnetic Stern-Gerlach type of force on the particle that is independent of the particle's mass and thus violates the universality of free fall. This effect is extremely small and its measurement is beyond present capabilities.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

80 extracted references · 76 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    I. B. Cohen, The Birth of a New Physics (Doubleday Anchor Books, Garden city, NY, 1960)

    work page 1960

  2. [2]

    Unitary Representations of the Inhomogen eous Lorentz Group

    E. P. Wigner, “Unitary Representations of the Inhomogen eous Lorentz Group”, Ann. Math. 40, 149-204 (1939)

    work page 1939

  3. [3]

    Mach, The Science of Mechanics (Open Court, La Salle, 1960)

    E. Mach, The Science of Mechanics (Open Court, La Salle, 1960)

    work page 1960

  4. [4]

    On the Gravitat ional effects of rotating masses - The Thirring-Lense Papers

    B. Mashhoon, F. W. Hehl, and D. S. Theiss, “On the Gravitat ional effects of rotating masses - The Thirring-Lense Papers”, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 16, 711-750 (1984)

    work page 1984

  5. [5]

    Complementarity of Absolute and Relative Motion

    B. Mashhoon, “Complementarity of Absolute and Relative Motion”, Phys. Lett. A 126, 393- 399 (1988)

    work page 1988

  6. [6]

    Quantum Theory and the Origin of Inertia

    B. Mashhoon, “Quantum Theory and the Origin of Inertia”, Found. Phys. Lett. 6, 545-560 (1993)

    work page 1993

  7. [7]

    On the Relativity of Rotation

    B. Mashhoon, “On the Relativity of Rotation”, in: Directions in General Relativity: Papers in Honor of Dieter Brill , edited by B. L. Hu and T. A. Jacobson (Cambridge University P ress, Cambridge, 1993), pp. 182-194

    work page 1993

  8. [8]

    On the Origin of Inertial Accelerations

    B. Mashhoon, “On the Origin of Inertial Accelerations”, Nuovo Cimento B 109, 187-199 (1994)

    work page 1994

Show all 80 references
  1. [9]

    Gra vitomagnetism and the clock effect

    B. Mashhoon, F. Gronwald, and H. I. M. Lichtenegger, “Gra vitomagnetism and the clock effect”, Lect. Notes Phys. 562, 83-108 (2001). [arXiv:gr-qc/9912027 [gr-qc]]

    2001 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Mach’s principle

    H. Lichtenegger and B. Mashhoon, “Mach’s principle”, i n: The Measurement of Gravitomag- netism: A Challenging Enterprise , edited by L. Iorio (Nova Science, New York, USA, 2007), pp. 13-25. [arXiv:physics/0407078 [physics.hist-ph]]

    2007 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Mach’s Principle and the Origin of Inerti a

    B. Mashhoon, “Mach’s Principle and the Origin of Inerti a”, Fundam. Theor. Phys. 183, 177- 187 (2016). [arXiv:1509.01869 [gr-qc]]

    2016 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Effect of E arth’s Rotation on the Quantum Mechanical Phase of the Neutron

    S. A. Werner, J. L. Staudenmann and R. Colella, “Effect of E arth’s Rotation on the Quantum Mechanical Phase of the Neutron”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 1103-1106 (1979)

    1979

  5. [13]

    Gravity and inertia in quantum mechanics

    J. L. Staudenmann, S. A. Werner, R. Colella, and A. W. Ove rhauser, “Gravity and inertia in quantum mechanics”, Phys. Rev. A 21, no.5, 1419 (1980). 13

    1980

  6. [14]

    Does a neutron know that the earth is rotat ing?

    S. A. Werner, “Does a neutron know that the earth is rotat ing?”, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 40, 921-934 (2008)

    2008

  7. [15]

    Rauch and S

    H. Rauch and S. A. Werner, Neutron Interferometry : Lessons in Experimental Quantum Mechanics, 2nd edn (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2015)

    2015

  8. [16]

    Neutron interferometry in a rotating fra me of reference

    B. Mashhoon, “Neutron interferometry in a rotating fra me of reference”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2639-2642 (1988)

    1988

  9. [17]

    Mashhoon replies

    B. Mashhoon, “Mashhoon replies”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 3812-3812 (1992)

    1992

  10. [18]

    Inertial effects of a Dirac partic le

    F. W. Hehl and W.-T. Ni, “Inertial effects of a Dirac partic le”, Phys. Rev. D 42, 2045-2048 (1990)

    1990

  11. [19]

    The physics of the Sagnac-Ma shhoon effects

    I. D. Soares and J. Tiomno, “The physics of the Sagnac-Ma shhoon effects”, Phys. Rev. D 54, 2808-2813 (1996)

    1996

  12. [20]

    Relativistic treatment of inertial spin effec ts

    L. Ryder, “Relativistic treatment of inertial spin effec ts”, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 31, 2465- 2469 (1998)

    1998

  13. [21]

    Spin rotation coupling in mu on g-2 experiments

    G. Papini and G. Lambiase, “Spin rotation coupling in mu on g-2 experiments”, Phys. Lett. A 294, 175-178 (2002). [arXiv:gr-qc/0106066 [gr-qc]]

    2002 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Parity and time reversal in the spin-rotati on interaction

    G. Papini, “Parity and time reversal in the spin-rotati on interaction”, Phys. Rev. D 65, 077901 (2002). [arXiv:gr-qc/0201098 [gr-qc]]

    2002 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Discrete symmetries in the s pin-rotation interaction

    G. Lambiase and G. Papini, “Discrete symmetries in the s pin-rotation interaction”, Phys. Rev. D 70, 097901 (2004)

    2004

  16. [24]

    Manifes tations of the rotation and gravity of the Earth in high-energy physics experiments

    Y. N. Obukhov, A. J. Silenko, and O. V. Teryaev, “Manifes tations of the rotation and gravity of the Earth in high-energy physics experiments”, Phys. Rev . D 94, no.4, 044019 (2016). [arXiv:1608.03808 [gr-qc]]

    2016 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Precision gyroscope from the helicity of li ght

    M. A. Fedderke, R. Harnik, D. E. Kaplan, S. Posen, S. Raje ndran, F. Serra, and V. P. Yakovlev, “Precision gyroscope from the helicity of li ght”, Phys. Rev. A 111, 043502 (2025). [arXiv:2406.16178 [physics.optics]]

    2025 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Spin-of-light gyroscop e and the spin-rotation coupling

    B. Mashhoon and Y. N. Obukhov, “Spin-of-light gyroscop e and the spin-rotation coupling”, Phys. Rev. D 110, no.10, 104015 (2024). [arXiv:2408.07799 [quant-ph]]

    2024 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Modification of the Doppler effect due to the helicity-rotation coupling

    B. Mashhoon, “Modification of the Doppler effect due to the helicity-rotation coupling”, Phys. Lett. A 306, 66-72 (2002). [arXiv:gr-qc/0209079 [gr-qc]]

    2002 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Electromagnetic waves in a rotating frame of reference

    J. C. Hauck and B. Mashhoon, “Electromagnetic waves in a rotating frame of reference”, Ann. Phys. (Berlin) 12, 275-288 (2003). [arXiv:gr-qc/0304069 [gr-qc]] 14

    2003 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Angular Doppler Effect

    B. A. Garetz, “Angular Doppler Effect”, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 71, 609-611 (1981)

    1981

  22. [30]

    Rotational Doppler Effect: A Revie w

    O. Emile and J. Emile, “Rotational Doppler Effect: A Revie w”, Ann. Phys. (Berlin) 535, 2300250 (2023)

    2023

  23. [31]

    Rotational Doppler Effect and Spin-Rotati on Coupling

    B. Mashhoon, “Rotational Doppler Effect and Spin-Rotati on Coupling”, [arXiv:2403.17151 [gr-qc]]

    arXiv

  24. [32]

    Relativity in the Global Positioning System

    N. Ashby, “Relativity in the Global Positioning System ”, Living Rev. Relativ. 6, 1 (2003)

    2003

  25. [33]

    On the spin-rotation-gravity coupling

    B. Mashhoon, “On the spin-rotation-gravity coupling” , Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 31, 681-691 (1999). [arXiv:gr-qc/9803017 [gr-qc]]

    1999 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Nonlocal Electrodynamics of Rotating Sy stems

    B. Mashhoon, “Nonlocal Electrodynamics of Rotating Sy stems”, Phys. Rev. A 72, 052105 (2005). [arXiv: hep-th/0503205]

    2005 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Nonlocal Special Relativity

    B. Mashhoon, “Nonlocal Special Relativity”, Ann. Phys . (Berlin) 520, 705-727 (2008). [arXiv:0805.2926 [gr-qc]]

    2008 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Mashhoon, Nonlocal Gravity (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2017)

    B. Mashhoon, Nonlocal Gravity (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2017)

    2017

  29. [37]

    Measurement of the spin-rotation coupling in neutron polarimetry

    B. Demirel, S. Sponar, and Y. Hasegawa, “Measurement of the spin-rotation coupling in neutron polarimetry”, New J. Phys. 17, 023065 (2015)

    2015

  30. [38]

    Deve lopment and performance of a miniaturised spin rotator suitable for neutron interferom eter experiments

    A. Danner, B. Demirel, S. Sponar, and Y. Hasegawa, “Deve lopment and performance of a miniaturised spin rotator suitable for neutron interferom eter experiments”, J. Phys. Commun. 3, 035001 (2019)

    2019

  31. [39]

    Spin-rotation coupling observed in neutron interferomet ry

    A. Danner, B. Demirel, W. Kersten, R. Wagner, H. Lemmel, S. Sponar, and Y. Hasegawa, “Spin-rotation coupling observed in neutron interferomet ry”, npj Quantum Information 6, 23 (2020). [arXiv:1904.07085 [quant-ph]]

    2020 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Measuring the angular moment um of a neutron using Earth’s rotation

    N. Geerits, S. Sponar, K. E. Steffen, W. M. Snow, S. R. Parne ll, G. Mauri, G. N. Smith, R. M. Dalgliesh and V. de Haan, “Measuring the angular moment um of a neutron using Earth’s rotation”, Phys. Rev. Res. 7, no.1, 013046 (2025). [arXiv:2407.09307 [quant-ph]]

    2025 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Ob servable frequency shifts via spin-rotation coupling

    B. Mashhoon, R. Neutze, M. Hannam, and G. E. Stedman, “Ob servable frequency shifts via spin-rotation coupling”, Phys. Lett. A 249, 161-166 (1998). [arXiv:gr-qc/9808077 [gr-qc]]

    1998 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Inertia of intrinsic spin

    B. Mashhoon and H. Kaiser, “Inertia of intrinsic spin”, Physica B 385, 1381-1383 (2006). [arXiv:quant-ph/0508182 [quant-ph]]

    2006 arXiv

  35. [43]

    L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Statistical Physics (Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK, 1969)

    1969

  36. [44]

    The Weyssenhoff fluid in E instein-Cartan theory

    Y. N. Obukhov and V. A. Korotky, “The Weyssenhoff fluid in E instein-Cartan theory”, Clas- sical Quantum Gravity 4, 1633-1657 (1987). 15

    1987

  37. [45]

    Spinning fluid in gene ral relativity

    Y. N. Obukhov and O. B. Piskareva, “Spinning fluid in gene ral relativity”, Classical Quantum Gravity 6, L15-L19 (1989)

    1989

  38. [46]

    A radiation torque experiment

    P. J. Allen, “A radiation torque experiment”, Am. J. Phy s. 34, 1185-1192 (1966)

    1966

  39. [47]

    Variable frequency shiftin g of circularly polarized laser radiation via a rotating half-wave plate

    B. A. Garetz and S. Arnold, “Variable frequency shiftin g of circularly polarized laser radiation via a rotating half-wave plate”, Opt. Commun. 31, 1-3 (1979)

    1979

  40. [48]

    Evolving G eometric Phase and Its Dynam- ical Manifestation as a Frequency Shift: An Optical Experim ent

    R. Simon, H. J. Kimble and E. C. G. Sudarshan, “Evolving G eometric Phase and Its Dynam- ical Manifestation as a Frequency Shift: An Optical Experim ent”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 19-22 (1988)

    1988

  41. [49]

    Doppler effect induced by rotating lenses

    G. Nienhuis, “Doppler effect induced by rotating lenses” , Opt. Commun. 132, 8-14 (1996)

    1996

  42. [50]

    Gravitomagnetic Stern-Gerlach force

    B. Mashhoon, “Gravitomagnetic Stern-Gerlach force”, Entropy 23, 445 (2021). [arXiv:2102.06433 [gr-qc]]

    2021 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Chirality as generaliz ed spin-orbit interaction in spin- tronics

    T. Yu, Z. Luo, and G. E. W. Bauer, “Chirality as generaliz ed spin-orbit interaction in spin- tronics”, Phys. Rept. 1009, 1-115 (2023). [arXiv:2206.05535 [cond-mat.mes-hall]]

    2023 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Gyro-spintronic material sci ence using vorticity gradient in solids

    Y. Nozaki, H. Sukegawa, S. Watanabe, S. Yunoki, T. Horag uchi, H. Nakayama, K. Yamanoi, Z. Wen, C. He, J. Song, T. Ohkubo, S. Mitani, K. Maezawa, D. Nis hikawa, S. Fujii, M. Matsuo, J. Fujimoto, and S. Maekawa, “Gyro-spintronic material sci ence using vorticity gradient in sol...

    2025

  45. [53]

    Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Bi nary Black Hole Merger

    B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, M. R. Abernathy, F. Acernese, K. Ackley, C. Adams, T. Adams, P. Addesso, R. X. Adhikari, et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Col- laboration), “Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Bi nary Black Hole Merger”, Phys. Rev. Le...

    2016

  46. [54]

    GW170817: Observation of gravitational waves from a binary neutron st ar inspiral

    B. P. Abbott, et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration), “ GW170817: Observation of gravitational waves from a binary neutron st ar inspiral”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 161101 (2017)

    2017

  47. [55]

    Gravity Probe B: Final results of a space experiment to test General Relativi ty

    C. W. F. Everitt, D. B. DeBra, B. W. Parkinson, J. P. Turne aure, J. W. Conklin, M. I. Heifetz, G. M. Keiser, A. S. Silbergleit, T. Holmes, and J. Kolodziejc zak, et al. “Gravity Probe B: Final results of a space experiment to test General Relativi ty”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 2...

    2011 arXiv

  48. [56]

    The Gravity Probe B test of general relativity

    C. W. F. Everitt, B. Muhlfelder, D. B. DeBra, B. W. Parkin son, J. P. Turneaure, A. S. Sil- bergleit, E. B. Acworth, M. Adams, R. Adler, and W. J. Bencze, et al. “The Gravity Probe B test of general relativity”, Classical Quantum Gravity 32, 224001 (2015). 16

    2015

  49. [57]

    Gravitoelectromagnetism: A brief revie w

    B. Mashhoon, “Gravitoelectromagnetism: A brief revie w”, in: The Measurement of Gravit- omagnetism: A Challenging Enterprise , L. Iorio, ed. (Nova Science, New York, USA, 2007), pp. 29-39. [arXiv: gr-qc/0311030]

    2007 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Gravitoelectromagnetism

    B. Mashhoon, “Gravitoelectromagnetism”, in Reference Frames and Gravitomagnetism, J.-F. Pascual-Sanchez, L. Floria, A. San Miguel, and F. Vicente, e ds. (World Scientific, Singapore, 2001), pp. 121-132. [arXiv: gr-qc/0011014]

    2001 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Gravitomagne tic helicity

    D. Bini, B. Mashhoon, and Yu. N. Obukhov, “Gravitomagne tic helicity”, Phys. Rev. D 105, 064028 (2022). [arXiv:2112.07550 [gr-qc]]

    2022 arXiv

  52. [60]

    On the theory of the magnetic influence on spe ctra; and on the radiation from moving ions

    J. Larmor, “On the theory of the magnetic influence on spe ctra; and on the radiation from moving ions”, Phil. Mag. 44, 503-512 (1897)

  53. [61]

    On the gravitational analogue of Larmor’ s theorem

    B. Mashhoon, “On the gravitational analogue of Larmor’ s theorem”, Phys. Lett. A 173, 347-354 (1993)

    1993

  54. [62]

    Representations of Dir ac equation in general relativity

    C. G. de Oliveira and J. Tiomno, “Representations of Dir ac equation in general relativity”, Nuovo Cimento 24, 672-687 (1962)

    1962

  55. [63]

    Can Einstein’s Theory of Gravitation be T ested Beyond the Geometrical Optics Limit?

    B. Mashhoon, “Can Einstein’s Theory of Gravitation be T ested Beyond the Geometrical Optics Limit?”, Nature 250, 316 (1974)

    1974

  56. [64]

    Influence of gravitation on the propagati on of electromagnetic radiation

    B. Mashhoon, “Influence of gravitation on the propagati on of electromagnetic radiation”, Phys. Rev. D 11, 2679-2684 (1975)

    1975

  57. [65]

    On the coupling of intrinsic spin with the rotation of the Earth

    B. Mashhoon, “On the coupling of intrinsic spin with the rotation of the Earth”, Phys. Lett. A 198, 9-13 (1995)

    1995

  58. [66]

    Gravitational couplings of intrinsic sp in

    B. Mashhoon, “Gravitational couplings of intrinsic sp in”, Classical Quantum Gravity 17, 2399-2409 (2000). [arXiv: gr-qc/0003022]

    2000 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Helicity-rotation-gravity coupling for gravitational waves

    J. Ramos and B. Mashhoon, “Helicity-rotation-gravity coupling for gravitational waves”, Phys. Rev. D 73, 084003 (2006). [arXiv:gr-qc/0601054 [gr-qc]]

    2006 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Spin-Gravity Coupling

    B. Mashhoon, “Spin-Gravity Coupling”, Acta Phys. Polo n. Supp. 1, 113-122 (2008). [arXiv:0801.2134 [gr-qc]]

    2008 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Spin-gravity coupling and gravity-induce d quantum phases

    G. Papini, “Spin-gravity coupling and gravity-induce d quantum phases”, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 40, 1117-1144 (2008). [arXiv:0709.0819 [gr-qc]]

    2008 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Spin precession in iner tial and gravitational fields

    B. Mashhoon and Yu. N. Obukhov, “Spin precession in iner tial and gravitational fields”, Phys. Rev. D 88, 064037 (2013). [arXiv:1307.5470 [gr-qc]] 17

    2013 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Test of Einstein Equivalence Principle for 0-spin and half-integer-spin at oms: Search for spin-gravity coupling effects

    M. G. Tarallo, T. Mazzoni, N. Poli, D. V. Sutyrin, X. Zhan g, and G. M. Tino, “Test of Einstein Equivalence Principle for 0-spin and half-integer-spin at oms: Search for spin-gravity coupling effects”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 023005 (2014). [arXiv:1403.1161 [physics.atom-ph]]

    2014 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Gravity Probe Spin: Prospects for measuring general -relativistic precession of intrinsic spin using a ferromagnetic gyroscope

    P. Fadeev, T. Wang, Y. B. Band, D. Budker, P. W. Graham, A. O. Sushkov, and D. F. J. Kim- ball, “Gravity Probe Spin: Prospects for measuring general -relativistic precession of intrinsic spin using a ferromagnetic gyroscope”, Phys. Rev. D 103, 044056 (2021). [arXiv:2006.09334 [gr-qc]]

    2021 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Spin-Gravi ty Coupling in a Rotating Uni- verse

    B. Mashhoon, M. Molaei, and Yu. N. Obukhov, “Spin-Gravi ty Coupling in a Rotating Uni- verse”, Symmetry 15, 1518 (2023). [arXiv:2304.08835 [gr-qc]]

    2023 arXiv

  66. [74]

    General relativity effects in precision spin experimental tests of fu ndamental symmetries

    S. N. Vergeles, N. N. Nikolaev, Yu. N. Obukhov, A. J. Sile nko, and O. V. Teryaev, “General relativity effects in precision spin experimental tests of fu ndamental symmetries”, Phys. Usp. 66, 109-147 (2023). [arXiv:2204.00427 [hep-th]]

    2023 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Lambiase and G

    G. Lambiase and G. Papini, The Interaction of Spin with Gravity in Particle Physics: Low Energy Quantum Gravity (Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021) [Lect. Notes Phys. 993, 190 pp. (2021)]

    2021

  68. [76]

    MICROSCOPE Mission: Final Results of the Te st of the Equivalence Principle

    P. Touboul et al. [MICROSCOPE], “MICROSCOPE Mission: Final Results of the Te st of the Equivalence Principle”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, no.12, 121102 (2022). [arXiv:2209.15487 [gr-qc]]

    2022 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Atomic Deuterium Maser

    D. J. Wineland and N. F. Ramsey, “Atomic Deuterium Maser ”, Phys. Rev. A 5, 821-837 (1972)

    1972

  70. [78]

    Electrodynamics in a linearly accelerat ed system

    B. Mashhoon, “Electrodynamics in a linearly accelerat ed system”, Phys. Lett. A 122, 67-72 (1987)

    1987

  71. [79]

    Nonlocal electrodynamics of linearly ac celerated systems

    B. Mashhoon, “Nonlocal electrodynamics of linearly ac celerated systems”, Phys. Rev. A 70, 062103 (2004). [arXiv:hep-th/0407278 [hep-th]]

    2004 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Spin, accelera tion and gravity

    D. Bini, C. Cherubini, and B. Mashhoon, “Spin, accelera tion and gravity”, Classical Quantum Gravity 21, 3893-3908 (2004). [arXiv:gr-qc/0406061 [gr-qc]]

    2004 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.