Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Time-resolved second-order autocorrelation function of parametric downconversion

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that the number of entangled temporal modes of a photon pair can be read from one beam alone: time-magnifying its autocorrelation gives a coherence degree $C$ tied to the Schmidt number by $K=\sqrt{1+4/C^2}$.

desk verdict Eq. (42) is a clean, new, internally consistent relation, but its practical reach outside the double-Gaussian model is unquantified. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.07691 v2 pith:GOY7QMST submitted 2025-02-11 quant-ph

D. B. Horoshko , S. Srivastava , F. Sośnicki , M. Miko{l}ajczyk , M. Karpiński , B. Brecht , M. I. Kolobov This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-ph PACS 42.65.Lm42.50.Ar
keywords temporalimagingparametricdownconversionSchmidtnumbersecond-orderautocorrelationdegreeofglobalcoherencephotonbunchingheraldedphotonstype-IIphasematching
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proposes a way to count the temporal modes that entangle two beams from parametric downconversion without looking at both beams. By time-stretching one beam with a temporal imaging system, the second-order autocorrelation function $g^{(2)}(\tau)$ moves from the picosecond to the nanosecond scale, and its width together with the single-count profile yields the temporal degree of global coherence $C$ of that beam. In the low-gain, double-Gaussian model the paper derives the exact link $K=\sqrt{1+4/C^2}$ between the Schmidt number $K$ and $C$, so one loss-insensitive measurement on one beam gives the effective number of entangled modes. The paper also predicts that the double-heralded autocorrelation function shows a local maximum near zero delay, a photon-bunching signature on top of its nonclassical antibunching background.

What carries the argument

The engine of the argument is the identity $K=\sqrt{1+4/C^2}$, where $K$ is the Schmidt number (the effective number of entangled temporal modes) and $C$ is the temporal degree of global coherence of one beam, defined as the ratio $\Delta\tau_o/\Delta t_o$ of coherence time to intensity width. Three pieces carry the derivation: the double-Gaussian joint spectral and temporal amplitude obtained by replacing the sinc phase-matching function with a Gaussian of matched width; the temporal imaging system (input dispersive medium, time lens, output dispersive medium) that magnifies the field envelope by $M$ so that $g^{(2)}_{\mathrm{im}}(\tau)=1+e^{-\tau^2/(M^2\Delta\tau_o^2)}$; and Mehler's formula, which converts the double-Gaussian joint amplitude into a Schmidt decomposition over Hermite-Gauss modes and, through the Mercer expansion, identifies those modes as the coherence modes of each beam.

What would settle it

A direct experiment would measure $C$ from the time-magnified $g^{(2)}$ of one beam and independently reconstruct the joint spectral amplitude of the pair, for example by stimulated emission tomography, across pump durations from 0.3 to 30 ps in the ppKTP crystal; if the inferred $\sqrt{1+4/C^2}$ disagrees with the Schmidt number of the measured joint spectral amplitude beyond error bars, the Gaussian-model relation does not hold for real phase matching.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the entanglement of twin beams can be diagnosed from a single beam's temporal coherence. For type-II parametric downconversion in the low-gain regime, the paper models the joint temporal amplitude as a double Gaussian and shows that one output beam is a Gaussian Schell-model source whose normalized first-order correlation is $\exp(-\tau^2/2\Delta\tau_o^2)$. The degree of global coherence $C=\Delta\tau_o/\Delta t_o$, extracted from the magnified $g^{(2)}(\tau)-1$ width and the intensity profile, is then related to the Schmidt number by $K^2=1+4/C^2$; high coherence means few modes, and low coherence means many. The derivation uses a Schmidt decomposition of the double-Gaussian joint amplitude via Mehler's formula, whose Mercer expansion shows that the same Hermite-Gauss modes are the coherence modes of each beam. The paper further shows that the single-heralded function keeps the bunching shape while the double-heralded function is a nonclassicality witness with a local maximum at zero delay.

Load-bearing premise

The strongest premise is that the joint spectral amplitude is exactly double-Gaussian, obtained by replacing the real sinc-shaped phase-matching function with a Gaussian of matched half-width; if that replacement is not faithful, both the measured degree of coherence and its mapping to the Schmidt number carry an unquantified systematic error.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In the highly multimode regime, where the traditional time-integrated $g^{(2)}_{\mathrm{int}}$ method gives $K=(g^{(2)}_{\mathrm{int}}-1)^{-1}$ with unstable error bars, the width-based measurement of $C$ keeps working, making it complementary.
  • For a 40-mm periodically poled KTP crystal with symmetric group velocity matching, the model gives $K=\frac12(\tau_p/\delta_s\tau_o+\delta_s\tau_o/\tau_p)$, with a single-mode minimum $K=1$ at $\tau_p\approx 3$ ps and multimode behavior for longer or shorter pump pulses.
  • The double-heralded autocorrelation function $g^{(2)}_{\mathrm{dh}}(\tau)$ is a nonclassicality witness whose local maximum at zero delay marks short-time photon bunching; the width of this feature can also be used to extract $C$.
  • A practical bound follows: measuring large $C$ requires both low pump repetition rate and a very large number of detection events, roughly $N\gg 10^6$ for $C\approx 5$, so the method is best suited to moderate and high mode numbers.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • For real crystals the sinc-shaped phase-matching function is only approximated by a Gaussian; a natural extension is to calibrate the $K$-$C$ mapping numerically for the exact sinc model, or to check whether a redefined effective $C$ restores $K^2=1+4/C^2$.
  • The same single-beam-coherence route to the Schmidt number should transfer to any two-beam source whose biphoton amplitude is approximately double-Gaussian, such as four-wave mixing or bright squeezed vacuum, where the Heisenberg-picture formulation already points to a high-gain generalization.
  • The local maximum in the double-heralded function could act as a temporal-mode diagnostic for quantum memories and multiplexed single-photon sources, since it marks the coherence time inside a heralded nonclassical stream without needing resolution of both conjugate photons.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a theoretical scheme for measuring the time-resolved second-order autocorrelation function g^(2)(tau) of one beam produced by type-II parametric downconversion (PDC), after stretching the beam with a temporal imaging system. In the low-gain regime and under a double-Gaussian model of the joint spectral amplitude — in which the sinc phase-matching function is replaced by a FWHM-matched Gaussian — the authors derive g^(2)(tau)=1+|g^(1)(tau)|^2, define a temporal degree of global coherence C as the ratio of the coherence time to the single-beam pulse duration, and obtain the parameter-free relation K^2=1+4/C^2 connecting the Schmidt number K to C. The paper illustrates the relation for a symmetric group-velocity-matched ppKTP crystal, discusses the experimental extraction of C from time-magnified single-count and coincidence profiles, and extends the formalism to single- and double-heralded autocorrelation functions, predicting a short-time bunching feature in the double-heralded case.

Significance. If the central relation is robust for realistic sources, the proposal offers a practical, loss-insensitive way to estimate the effective number of entangled modes in the multimode regime, complementing the traditional time-integrated autocorrelation method. The analytical work has real strengths: the Gaussian integrations in Appendix A and the Mehler-based Schmidt decomposition in Appendix B are internally consistent, and Eq. (42) is a genuine parameter-free consequence of the model rather than a fit to data. The proposal also extends naturally to heralded configurations, giving concrete predictions for coincidence-counting experiments. The main open risk is external validity: the K-C relation is derived for an exactly double-Gaussian joint spectral amplitude, and the paper does not yet quantify how deviations from this model (notably the sinc phase-matching function) bias the inferred Schmidt number.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. III.B–III.C, Eqs. (24) and (42)] The central inferential claim is established only for the double-Gaussian JTA. In a real type-II source the phase-matching function is sinc, and replacing it by a FWHM-matched Gaussian changes both the marginal coherence function (hence the experimentally fitted C) and the Schmidt spectrum (hence K) in a way whose sign and magnitude are not estimated. Since C is operationally defined through Gaussian fits of the magnified g^(2)(tau)-1 and single-count profiles, applying Eq. (42) to a measured C requires a systematic-error analysis. I ask the authors to add a numerical comparison with the exact sinc JSA for the ppKTP parameters of Sec. III.D, or an experimental calibration, and to state the resulting uncertainty on the inferred K.
  2. [Sec. IV, Eq. (51)] The factor 1/2 in the triple-coincidence count for the binary bucket detector is asserted in one sentence and illustrated in Fig. 5, but the derivation from the photodetection statistics is not given. Since Eqs. (54) and (55) and the predicted amplitude of the bunching feature depend on this factor, the counting argument should be written out explicitly, for example by summing over the relevant photon-number configurations and applying the on/off detector response.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. III.B] The choice sigma_s=1.61 is said to match the sinc function at half maximum; a brief statement of how this matching is done and how the JSA approximation error behaves would help the reader assess the model's range of validity.
  2. [Sec. IV, Eq. (57)] The discontinuity of g^(1,1)_int(tau) at the boundary of the pump period should be commented on explicitly; it reflects the assumption that fields in different periods are completely decorrelated.
  3. [Fig. 3] The panels labeled 'magnified single-count rate' are plotted in normalized units; the normalization should be stated in the caption to avoid confusion with absolute photon rates.
  4. [Sec. II.C] The validity conditions of the temporal imaging transformation, Eq. (16), are stated briefly; adding one or two sentences summarizing the effects of finite time-lens aperture and residual dispersion would make the experimental feasibility discussion more complete.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the K–C relation is a derived algebraic consequence of the stated Gaussian model, and the proposed measurement protocol determines C from independent width data.

full rationale

The paper's central relation, Eq. (42), is obtained by combining two independently derived expressions within the same explicit double-Gaussian model: the degree of global coherence C is defined in Eq. (32) as the ratio of the coherence time to the intensity width, and the Schmidt number K is obtained from the Mehler-based Schmidt decomposition in Eq. (39). Both quantities are expressed in terms of the same model parameters To and Te, but the relation K^2 = 1 + 4/C^2 is a derived algebraic identity of that model, not an input. The proposed experimental protocol is also not circular: C is inferred from Gaussian fits of the magnified g^(2)(tau)-1 width and the single-count profile (Sec. III.B), and K is then inferred through Eq. (42); no parameter is fitted to K itself. The Gaussian approximation of the sinc phase-matching function is openly stated as a replacement with matching half-maximum width, σ_s = 1.61, citing Refs. [46,47], and its limitations for real sinc-shaped phase matching are a modeling-validity concern, not a circularity. The temporal imaging scaling used in Eq. (17) is taken from the authors' prior Ref. [13], but that is an externally published and experimentally supported formalism rather than an unverified self-citation invoked to forbid alternatives. None of the load-bearing steps reduces, by construction, to its own inputs, and no fitted quantity is renamed as a prediction. The paper is therefore self-contained with respect to circularity, and the appropriate finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 1 invented entities

No parameter is fitted to experimental data. The model uses standard PDC approximations, one Gaussian replacement parameter (sigma_s = 1.61), and no new physical entities; the temporal degree of global coherence C is a measurable metric, not a new force or particle.

free parameters (1)
  • sigma_s, width parameter of the Gaussian phase-matching replacement = 1.61
    Chosen so the Gaussian in Eq. (24) has the same FWHM as the sinc phase-matching function; not fitted to experimental data, but it is an adjustable modeling parameter that enters To, Te, K, and C.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption Low-gain regime: the probability Pb of generating one photon pair per pump pulse is much less than 1, so at most one pair contributes.
    Used from Eq. (18) onward; perturbation theory replaces vacuum operators inside integrals. Stated at the start of Sec. III.
  • domain assumption Linear frequency dispersion in the nonlinear crystal: k_mu(Omega) approx k0_mu + k'_mu Omega for both subharmonic waves.
    Phase mismatch becomes tau_o Omega + tau_e Omega', Eq. (19); higher-order dispersion is dropped (Sec. III.A).
  • domain assumption Gaussian phase-matching: the sinc function is replaced by a Gaussian with sigma_s = 1.61, sharing the same FWHM.
    Eq. (24) makes the JSA a double Gaussian, enabling all closed-form results including Eq. (42).
  • domain assumption Classical undepleted transform-limited Gaussian pump.
    Pump spectral amplitude alpha(Omega) = alpha_0 exp(-Omega^2/4 Omega_p^2), no pump depletion; Sec. II.A.
  • domain assumption Ideal time lens with infinite temporal aperture, perfect synchronization, and unit efficiency.
    Eq. (16) requires the imaging condition (15) and aperture conditions stated in Sec. II.C.
  • domain assumption Lossless nonlinear crystal and detection; only linear loss between crystal and detectors is considered.
    Loss in the crystal is explicitly deferred to future work (Sec. III.C); detection loss is argued to cancel in normalized quantities.
  • standard math Gaussian moment factoring of the fourth-order field correlator.
    Eq. (11) uses the Gaussian statistics of the Bogoliubov-transformed vacuum, valid because the state is Gaussian.
invented entities (1)
  • Temporal degree of global coherence C independent evidence
    purpose: Quantifies single-beam temporal coherence as the ratio of coherence time to intensity width; used to infer the Schmidt number K by Eq. (42).
    Not a new physical entity; it is a measurable ratio of two Gaussian widths defined by Eq. (32), with a direct operational meaning in the proposed experiment.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Time-resolved second-order autocorrelation function of parametric downconversion." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GOY7QMST

@misc{pith2026250207691,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Time-resolved second-order autocorrelation function of parametric downconversion},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GOY7QMST}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.07691}
}
read the original abstract

We study a possibility of measuring the time-resolved second-order autocorrelation function of one of two beams generated in type-II parametric downconversion by means of temporal magnification of this beam, bringing its correlation time from the picosecond to the nanosecond scale, which can be resolved by modern photodetectors. We show that such a measurement enables one to infer directly the degree of global coherence of that beam, which is linked by a simple relation to the number of modes characterizing the entanglement between the two generated beams. We illustrate the proposed method by an example of photon pairs generated in a periodically poled KTP crystal with a symmetric group velocity matching for various durations of the pump pulse, resulting in different numbers of modes. Our theoretical model also shows that the magnified double-heralded autocorrelation function of one beam exhibits a local maximum around zero delay time, corresponding to photon bunching at a short time scale.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.07691 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Scheme for generation of photon pairs and detection of their second-order correlation function. A pump pulse impinges [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Schmidt number and inverse degree of global coher [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (a,c) Normalized JSA and (b,d) temporally magnified [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Scheme similar to Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Triple coincidences from four photons. Ordinary (o) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Time correlations from steady-state expectation values

    quant-ph 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Steady-state susceptibility to a control parameter yields a universal lower bound on relaxation and second-order correlation times of driven-dissipative quantum systems.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 65 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    The field obtained from the vacuum by means of a Bogoliubov transformation is known to pos- sess Gaussian statistics, which means that its higher- order moments are expressed via its second-order mo- ments [2]. Thus, all correlation functions can be ob- tained from the first-order ones: the normal autocor- relator and crosscorrelator ⟨ ˆE(−) µ (L, t) ˆE(+...

    work page

  2. [2]

    temporal imaging

    (we omit the position L for simplicity), ⟨ ˆE(−) o (t) ˆE(−) o (t + τ ) ˆE(+) o (t + τ ) ˆE(+) o (t)⟩ = ⟨ ˆE(−) o (t) ˆE(+) o (t)⟩⟨ ˆE(−) o (t + τ ) ˆE(+) o (t + τ )⟩ + |⟨ ˆE(−) o (t) ˆE(+) o (t + τ )⟩|2 + |⟨ ˆE(+) o (t) ˆE(+) o (t + τ )⟩|2. (11) Upon discarding the last term, the anomalous autocor- relator being identically equal to zero, and substitutin...

    work page

  3. [3]

    As a re- sult, the degree of global coherence can be found as C = √ 2∆τM /∆tM . The described method of measuring the degree of global coherence is insensitive to the loss which may oc- cur between the crystal and the detectors, including the non-unit quantum efficiency of the latter. Indeed, linear loss does not affect the normalized temporal profile of ...

    work page

  4. [4]

    binary bucket

    Since photodetection events have a Gaussian distribution in time with the standard deviation M ∆to, we find that the average number of events outside the area ±M ∆τo/ √ 2 around the peak is Nout = N erfc(C/ √ 2). In order for the fit of the de- pendence of the magnified function g(2)(τ ) − 1 within its entire σ area to be efficient, we expect Nout ≫ 1. Th...

    work page 2020

  5. [5]

    R. J. Glauber, The quantum theory of optical coherence, Phys. Rev. 130, 2529 (1963)

    1963

  6. [6]

    Mandel and E

    L. Mandel and E. Wolf, Optical Coherence and Quantum Optics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995)

    1995

  7. [7]

    Arakawa and M

    Y. Arakawa and M. J. Holmes, Progress in quantum-dot single photon sources for quantum information technolo- gies: A broad spectrum overview, Appl. Phys. Rev. 7, 021309 (2020)

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    Toninelli, I

    C. Toninelli, I. Gerhardt, A. Clark, A. Reserbat-Plantey, S. G¨ otzinger, Z. Ristanovi´ c, M. Colautti, P. Lombardi, K. Major, I. Deperasi´ nska,et al., Single organic molecules for photonic quantum technologies, Nat. Materials 20, 1615 (2021)

    work page 2021

Show all 70 references
  1. [9]

    M. W. Doherty, N. B. Manson, P. Delaney, F. Jelezko, J. Wrachtrup, and L. C. Hollenberg, The nitrogen- vacancy colour centre in diamond, Phys. Rep. 528, 1 (2013)

    2013

  2. [10]

    Christ, K

    A. Christ, K. Laiho, A. Eckstein, K. N. Cassemiro, and C. Silberhorn, Probing multimode squeezing with corre- lation functions, New J. Phys. 13, 033027 (2011)

    2011

  3. [11]

    B. H. Kolner, Space-time duality and the theory of tem- poral imaging, IEEE J. Quantum Elect. 30, 1951 (1994)

    1994

  4. [12]

    Salem, M

    R. Salem, M. A. Foster, and A. L. Gaeta, Application of space–time duality to ultrahigh-speed optical signal processing, Adv. Opt. Photonics 5, 275 (2013)

    2013

  5. [13]

    Lavoie, J

    J. Lavoie, J. M. Donohue, L. G. Wright, A. Fedrizzi, and K. J. Resch, Spectral compression of single photons, Nat. Photonics 7, 363 (2013)

    2013

  6. [14]

    Karpi´ nski, M

    M. Karpi´ nski, M. Jachura, L. J. Wright, and B. J. Smith, Bandwidth manipulation of quantum light by an electro- optic time lens, Nat. Photonics 11, 53–57 (2017)

    2017

  7. [15]

    Mittal, V

    S. Mittal, V. V. Orre, A. Restelli, R. Salem, E. A. Gold- schmidt, and M. Hafezi, Temporal and spectral manip- ulations of correlated photons using a time lens, Phys. Rev. A 96, 043807 (2017)

    2017

  8. [16]

    Patera, J

    G. Patera, J. Shi, D. B. Horoshko, and M. I. Kolobov, Quantum temporal imaging: application of a time lens to quantum optics, J. Opt. 19, 054001 (2017)

    2017

  9. [17]

    Patera, D

    G. Patera, D. B. Horoshko, and M. I. Kolobov, Space- time duality and quantum temporal imaging, Phys. Rev. A 98, 053815 (2018)

    2018

  10. [18]

    J. Shi, G. Patera, D. B. Horoshko, and M. I. Kolobov, Quantum temporal imaging of antibunching, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 37, 3741 (2020)

    2020

  11. [19]

    So´ snicki, M

    F. So´ snicki, M. Miko lajczyk, A. Golestani, and M. Karpi´ nski, Aperiodic electro-optic time lens for spec- tral manipulation of single-photon pulses, Appl. Phys. Lett. 116, 234003 (2020)

    2020

  12. [20]

    Joshi, B

    C. Joshi, B. M. Sparkes, A. Farsi, T. Gerrits, V. Verma, S. Ramelow, S. W. Nam, and A. L. Gaeta, Picosecond- resolution single-photon time lens for temporal mode quantum processing, Optica 9, 364 (2022)

    2022

  13. [21]

    So´ snicki, M

    F. So´ snicki, M. Miko lajczyk, A. Golestani, and M. Karpi´ nski, Interface between picosecond and nanosec- ond quantum light pulses, Nat. Photonics 17, 761 (2023)

    2023

  14. [22]

    D. N. Klyshko, Photons and Nonlinear Optics (Gordon and Breach, New York, 1988)

    1988

  15. [23]

    M. H. Rubin, D. N. Klyshko, Y. H. Shih, and A. V. Sergienko, Theory of two-photon entanglement in type- II optical parametric down-conversion, Phys. Rev. A 50, 14 5122 (1994)

    1994

  16. [24]

    W. P. Grice and I. A. Walmsley, Spectral information and distinguishability in type-II down-conversion with a broadband pump, Phys. Rev. A 56, 1627 (1997)

    1997

  17. [25]

    T. E. Keller and M. H. Rubin, Theory of two-photon en- tanglement for spontaneous parametric down-conversion driven by a narrow pump pulse, Phys. Rev. A 56, 1534 (1997)

    1997

  18. [26]

    M. I. Kolobov, The spatial behavior of nonclassical light, Rev. Mod. Phys. 71, 1539 (1999)

    1999

  19. [27]

    Huttner, S

    B. Huttner, S. Serulnik, and Y. Ben-Aryeh, Quantum analysis of light propagation in a parametric amplifier, Phys. Rev. A 42, 5594 (1990)

    1990

  20. [28]

    D. B. Horoshko, Generator of spatial evolution of the electromagnetic field, Phys. Rev. A 105, 013708 (2022)

    2022

  21. [29]

    Y. R. Shen, Quantum statistics of nonlinear optics, Phys. Rev. 155, 921 (1967)

    1967

  22. [30]

    D. B. Horoshko, M. I. Kolobov, V. Parigi, and N. Treps, Few-mode squeezing in type-I parametric downconver- sion by complete group velocity matching, Opt. Lett. 10.1364/OL.528280 (2024)

    2024 doi

  23. [31]

    R. W. Boyd, Nonlinear Optics (Academic Press, New York, 2020)

    2020

  24. [32]

    D. B. Horoshko and M. I. Kolobov, Generation of mono- cycle squeezed light in chirped quasi-phase-matched non- linear crystals, Phys. Rev. A 95, 033837 (2017)

    2017

  25. [33]

    C. M. Caves and D. D. Crouch, Quantum wideband traveling-wave analysis of a degenerate parametric am- plifier, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 4, 1535 (1987)

    1987

  26. [34]

    L. S. Telegin and A. S. Chirkin, Reversal and reconstruc- tion of the profile of ultrashort light pulses, Sov. J. Quan- tum Electr. 15, 101 (1985)

    1985

  27. [35]

    B. H. Kolner and M. Nazarathy, Temporal imaging with a time lens, Opt. Lett. 14, 630 (1989)

    1989

  28. [36]

    Mouradian, F

    L. Mouradian, F. Louradour, V. Messager, A. Barthelemy, and C. Froehly, Spectro-temporal imaging of femtosecond events, IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics 36, 795 (2000)

    2000

  29. [37]

    C. V. Bennett and B. H. Kolner, Principles of paramet- ric temporal imaging. I. System configurations, IEEE J. Quantum Elect. 36, 430 (2000)

    2000

  30. [38]

    C. V. Bennett and B. H. Kolner, Principles of paramet- ric temporal imaging. II. System performance, IEEE J. Quantum Elect. 36, 649 (2000)

    2000

  31. [39]

    M. A. Foster, R. Salem, D. F. Geraghty, A. C. Turner- Foster, M. Lipson, and A. L. Gaeta, Silicon-chip-based ultrafast optical oscilloscope, Nature 456, 81 (2008)

    2008

  32. [40]

    S. Meir, Y. Tamir, H. Duadi, E. Cohen, and M. Frid- man, Ultrafast temporal SU(1,1) interferometer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 253601 (2023)

    2023

  33. [41]

    Mazelanik, A

    M. Mazelanik, A. Leszczy´ nski, M. Lipka, M. Parniak, and W. Wasilewski, Temporal imaging for ultra-narrowband few-photon states of light, Optica 7, 203 (2020)

    2020

  34. [42]

    Mazelanik, A

    M. Mazelanik, A. Leszczy´ nski, and M. Parniak, Optical-domain spectral super-resolution via a quantum- memory-based time-frequency processor, Nature Comm. 13, 1 (2022)

    2022

  35. [43]

    Niewelt, M

    B. Niewelt, M. Jastrzebski, S. Kurzyna, J. Nowosielski, W. Wasilewski, M. Mazelanik, and M. Parniak, Experi- mental implementation of the optical fractional Fourier transform in the time-frequency domain, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 240801 (2023)

    2023

  36. [44]

    Srivastava, D

    S. Srivastava, D. B. Horoshko, and M. I. Kolobov, Erect- ing time telescope for photonic quantum networks, Opt. Express 31, 38560 (2023)

    2023

  37. [45]

    Patera, D

    G. Patera, D. B. Horoshko, M. Allgaier, M. I. Kolobov, and C. Silberhorn, Modal approach to quantum temporal imaging, Phys. Rev. A 108, 043716 (2023)

    2023

  38. [46]

    Srivastava, D

    S. Srivastava, D. B. Horoshko, and M. I. Kolobov, Making entangled photons indistinguishable by a time lens, Phys. Rev. A 107, 033705 (2023)

    2023

  39. [47]

    Quesada and J

    N. Quesada and J. E. Sipe, Time-ordering effects in the generation of entangled photons using nonlinear optical processes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 093903 (2015)

    2015

  40. [48]

    Christ, B

    A. Christ, B. Brecht, W. Mauerer, and C. Silberhorn, Theory of quantum frequency conversion and type-II parametric down-conversion in the high-gain regime, New J. Phys. 15, 053038 (2013)

    2013

  41. [49]

    Lipfert, D

    T. Lipfert, D. B. Horoshko, G. Patera, and M. I. Kolobov, Bloch-Messiah decomposition and Magnus expansion for parametric down-conversion with monochromatic pump, Phys. Rev. A 98, 013815 (2018)

    2018

  42. [50]

    W. P. Grice, A. B. U’Ren, and I. A. Walmsley, Eliminat- ing frequency and space-time correlations in multiphoton states, Phys. Rev. A 64, 063815 (2001)

    2001

  43. [51]

    D. B. Horoshko, L. La Volpe, F. Arzani, N. Treps, C. Fabre, and M. I. Kolobov, Bloch-Messiah reduction for twin beams of light, Phys. Rev. A100, 013837 (2019)

    2019

  44. [52]

    D. B. Horoshko and M. I. Kolobov, Interferometric sort- ing of temporal Hermite-Gauss modes via temporal Gouy phase, Phys. Rev. A 110, 033721 (2024)

    2024

  45. [53]

    C. K. Law and J. H. Eberly, Analysis and interpreta- tion of high transverse entanglement in optical paramet- ric down conversion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 127903 (2004)

    2004

  46. [54]

    D. B. Horoshko, G. Patera, A. Gatti, and M. I. Kolobov, X-entangled biphotons: Schmidt number for 2D model, Eur. Phys. J. D 66, 239 (2012)

    2012

  47. [55]

    Gatti, T

    A. Gatti, T. Corti, E. Brambilla, and D. B. Horoshko, Di- mensionality of the spatiotemporal entanglement of para- metric down-conversion photon pairs, Phys. Rev. A 86, 053803 (2012)

    2012

  48. [56]

    P. R. Sharapova, G. Frascella, M. Riabinin, A. M. P´ erez, O. V. Tikhonova, S. Lemieux, R. W. Boyd, G. Leuchs, and M. V. Chekhova, Properties of bright squeezed vac- uum at increasing brightness, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 013371 (2020)

    2020

  49. [57]

    V. A. Averchenko, G. Frascella, M. Kalash, A. Cavanna, and M. V. Chekhova, Reconstructing two-dimensional spatial modes for classical and quantum light, Phys. Rev. A 102, 053725 (2020)

    2020

  50. [58]

    D. A. Kopylov, T. Meier, and P. R. Sharapova, Theory of multimode squeezed light generation in lossy media, Quantum 9, 1621 (2025)

    2025

  51. [59]

    I. B. Bobrov, S. S. Straupe, E. V. Kovlakov, and S. P. Ku- lik, Schmidt-like coherent mode decomposition and spa- tial intensity correlations of thermal light, New J. Phys. 15, 073016 (2013)

    2013

  52. [60]

    Ansari, J

    V. Ansari, J. M. Donohue, B. Brecht, and C. Silberhorn, Tailoring nonlinear processes for quantum optics with pulsed temporal-mode encodings, Optica 5, 534 (2018)

    2018

  53. [61]

    Giovannetti, L

    V. Giovannetti, L. Maccone, J. H. Shapiro, and F. N. C. Wong, Generating entangled two-photon states with co- incident frequencies, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 183602 (2002)

    2002

  54. [62]

    Brecht, D

    B. Brecht, D. V. Reddy, C. Silberhorn, and M. G. Raymer, Photon temporal modes: A complete framework for quantum information science, Phys. Rev. X 5, 041017 (2015)

    2015

  55. [63]

    K¨ onig and F

    F. K¨ onig and F. N. C. Wong, Extended phase match- 15 ing of second-harmonic generation in periodically poled KTiOPO4 with zero group-velocity mismatch, Appl. Phys. Lett. 84, 1644 (2004)

    2004

  56. [64]

    P. J. Mosley, J. S. Lundeen, B. J. Smith, P. Wasylczyk, A. B. U’Ren, C. Silberhorn, and I. A. Walmsley, Heralded generation of ultrafast single photons in pure quantum states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 133601 (2008)

    2008

  57. [65]

    Grangier, G

    P. Grangier, G. Roger, and A. Aspect, Experimental evi- dence for a photon anticorrelation effect on a beam split- ter: a new light on single-photon interferences, Europhys. Lett. 1, 173 (1986)

    1986

  58. [66]

    A. B. U’Ren, C. Silberhorn, J. L. Ball, K. Banaszek, and I. A. Walmsley, Characterization of the nonclassical nature of conditionally prepared single photons, Phys. Rev. A 72, 021802 (2005)

    2005

  59. [67]

    Bocquillon, C

    E. Bocquillon, C. Couteau, M. Razavi, R. Laflamme, and G. Weihs, Coherence measures for heralded single-photon sources, Phys. Rev. A 79, 035801 (2009)

    2009

  60. [68]

    Coherence measures for her- alded single-photon sources

    S. Bettelli, Comment on “Coherence measures for her- alded single-photon sources”, Phys. Rev. A 81, 037801 (2010)

    2010

  61. [69]

    C. T. Lee, Theorem on nonclassical states, Phys. Rev. A 52, 3374 (1995)

    1995

  62. [70]

    D. B. Horoshko, S. De Bi` evre, G. Patera, and M. I. Kolobov, Thermal-difference states of light: Quantum states of heralded photons, Phys. Rev. A 100, 053831 (2019)

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.