Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 27 references

Total acoustic transmission between fluids using a solid material with emphasis on the air-water interface

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A purely solid panel of two elastic plates and periodic ribs can transmit sound from water into air with total efficiency, at a frequency set almost entirely by the areal density of the air-facing plate.

desk verdict A genuinely explicit analytical design rule for solid-only water-air matching, with a real but bounded validation gap around rib mass and stiffness. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.07723 v1 pith:6HKI3L7R submitted 2025-02-11 physics.app-ph

Hesam Bakhtiary Yekta , Andrew N. Norris This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.app-ph MSC 74J2076Q05
keywords acousticimpedancematchingwater-airsoundtransmissionflex-layertransformerrib-stiffenedplatestotalperiodicstructureKirchhoffplatetheoryasymptoticapproximation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that a purely solid, passive panel—two thin elastic plates separated by a periodic row of ribs—can achieve total acoustic transmission from water into air at a chosen frequency. The transmission frequency is set, to within a fraction of a percent, by a single quantity: the areal density of the plate facing air, through $\omega_0 \approx \sqrt{Z_w Z_a}/m_2$. A second closed-form condition fixes the rib spacing from the bending stiffnesses of both plates, so the whole device is designable from explicit formulas rather than by numerical search. The authors verify the prediction against full-wave finite-element simulations and show that the effect persists almost unchanged for oblique incidence, contrary to what the normal-incidence derivation would suggest. If correct, this gives a passive, membrane-free, impedance-matching layer for the notoriously difficult air–water interface.

What carries the argument

The central object is the flex-layer impedance transformer: two parallel elastic plates with mass per area $m_j$ and bending stiffness $D_j$, joined by periodically spaced ribs, with vacuum or air in the gap. The argument is carried by a Fourier-transform scattering solution in which the periodic rib forces become Bloch harmonics via the Poisson summation identity, reducing the plate–fluid interaction to admittance sums. Taking the limit of rigid, massless ribs collapses the reflection coefficient to a single function; its real part gives the total-transmission frequency and its imaginary part gives the rib-spacing condition. The quasistatic limit of that condition is the simple spring–mass identity $\kappa m_2 = Z_w Z_a$ with plate stiffnesses in series, which is what makes the design closed-form.

What would settle it

Build an aluminum flex-layer with a 1 mm water-side plate, choose a target of 500 Hz, set the air-side plate thickness to approximately 2.89 mm and the rib spacing to approximately 7.58 cm as prescribed, and measure the water-to-air transmitted energy in a tank or impedance tube. If the transmission peak is not at 500 Hz, or the peak energy is substantially below unity, the central claim is wrong; a full-wave simulation that assigns realistic rib mass and compliance and shows a large frequency shift would similarly falsify the ideal-limit prediction.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The discovery is an explicit analytical solution for scattering of a plane wave from an asymmetric pair of periodically rib-stiffened Kirchhoff plates separating two fluids, and the two conditions for total transmission that follow from it. In the limit of rigid, massless ribs, the reflection coefficient for normal incidence factors, and setting its real and imaginary parts to zero yields the frequency condition $\omega_0 \approx \sqrt{Z_w Z_a}/m_2$ and a transcendental equation for the rib spacing $d$ that reduces to $\kappa m_2 \approx Z_w Z_a$ with $\kappa = \frac{720}{d^4}(1/D_1 + 1/D_2)^{-1}$. The same frequency condition is rederived from a one-period lumped model, showing that the plate facing water contributes almost no average motion: its displacement stays about $\sqrt{\epsilon}$ times that of the air plate, so the structure behaves as a spring–mass transformer with effective mass $m_2$ and effective stiffness determined by both plates in series. Theory and full-wave simulation agree closely for 250, 500, and 1000 Hz designs, including at 30 degrees incidence, and the Q-factor of the resonance is bounded below by $1/(2\sqrt{\epsilon}) \approx 30.6$.

Load-bearing premise

The derivation of the two closed-form design conditions assumes the ribs are rigid and massless point contacts and that the gap between plates is vacuum; real ribs have finite mass, compliance, and footprint, and trapped air adds stiffness, so the claimed formulas hold exactly only in that ideal limit.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A designer can choose a target frequency $f_0$, plate material, and water-side plate thickness, then compute the air-side plate thickness from the frequency condition and the rib spacing from the spacing condition; no numerical optimization is needed.
  • Because only the air-facing plate mass sets the resonance frequency, the water-facing plate can be varied independently to tune bandwidth without moving the transmission peak.
  • The device is predicted to transmit almost identically for incidence up to at least 30 degrees, so alignment sensitivity is low.
  • The Q-factor lower bound of about 30.6 means the transmitted peak cannot be broader, at fixed water/air impedance ratio, than the ideal spring–mass resonator, providing a physical target for bandwidth comparisons.
  • The explicit formulas allow systematic corrections for realistic effects such as entrained air and finite rib mass, rather than requiring a fresh numerical optimization for each design.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same asymptotic machinery likely applies to any fluid pair with a small impedance ratio, so the design formulas may transfer to other liquid–gas couplings with only the impedance ratio $\epsilon$ updated.
  • The near-angle-independence hints that evanescent Bloch near-fields on the water-side plate, not the radiating plane wave, carry the impedance transformation; a testable extension is whether a finite periodic patch with only a few ribs still transmits well when the mode shape $w_1 \approx A_1 \cos(2\pi y/d)$ is preserved.
  • The rigid-massless point-rib idealization sets a robustness limit: as ribs become compliant or massive, the exact design conditions will require renormalized effective mass and stiffness, and quantifying that threshold is a direct next step.
  • Broadening the bandwidth beyond $Q \approx 30.6$ would require abandoning the single-resonance spring–mass picture, for instance with coupled or graded rib resonators; the formulas here provide the baseline resonator for such designs.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper develops an analytical model for total acoustic transmission between water and air through a periodic solid structure consisting of two elastic plates connected by ribs. Starting from an explicit scattering solution for a flex-layer, the authors derive closed-form conditions for full transmission: Eq. (36) gives the transmission frequency as sqrt(Zw Za)/m2, dependent on the mass per unit area of the air-side plate, and Eq. (37), with the approximation Eq. (39), sets the rib spacing in terms of the bending stiffnesses of both plates. The derivations use asymptotic expansions in the small impedance ratio epsilon = Za/Zw. The predictions are compared with COMSOL simulations at 250, 500, and 1000 Hz and for oblique incidence up to 30 degrees, with good agreement except for minor deviations at 1000 Hz. The paper also studies the effect of entrained air between the plates and the Q-factor of the transmission resonance, finding a lower bound Q about 30.6.

Significance. If the claims hold, this provides a rare analytically explicit design route for water-air acoustic impedance matching using a purely solid, passive structure, in contrast to previous membrane-, bubble-, or topology-optimization-based approaches. The closed-form nature of Eqs. (36)-(39) is a genuine strength, as are the COMSOL confirmations at multiple frequencies and angles. The explicit scattering derivation, with the small parameter epsilon justifying the asymptotics, gives the results a solid theoretical grounding. However, the validity of the design equations is confined to the rigid-massless-rib limit, and the absence of a quantitative bound on finite rib mass effects leaves the practical design claim incomplete.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section V (before Eq. (32)) and Section VI A] The total-transmission conditions Eqs. (36) and (37) are derived in the limit 1/Z0- -> 0 and Z0+ -> 0 (rigid, massless ribs). The COMSOL validation uses ribs of finite mass (1 cm by 1 mm aluminum), and the paper reports only "slight deviations" at 1000 Hz without quantifying them. In the 1000-Hz case the rib mass per period is about 0.46 kg/m^2 against m2 = 3.89 kg/m^2 (about 12%), and through the common-mode impedance Z0+ this shifts the effective air-side mass and hence the resonance by roughly 3%. Because no bound or correction is given, a designer using Eqs. (36)-(39) cannot know a priori whether the realized device will transmit at the target frequency. Please include the finite rib mass and compliance effects in the design equations or state a quantitative criterion (e.g., limits on m_r/m2 and rib stiffness) for which the ideal formulas hold to a specified tolerance.
  2. [Section III B (after Eq. (7))] The statement that Eq. (36) is "precise if m1 = m2 and is otherwise less than 0.1% in error" is not uniformly valid. The exact expression Eq. (35) contains the factor sqrt((1-epsilon)/(1-epsilon m1^2/m2^2)), whose deviation from 1 is approximately 0.5 epsilon (m1^2/m2^2 - 1); for epsilon = 0.267 x 10^-3 this exceeds 0.1% when m1/m2 is greater than about 3. Since h1 is a free design parameter, the paper should either qualify this error bound with an explicit range of m1/m2 or restrict the claim to the demonstrated parameter range.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and Section III B] The statement that the full-transmission frequency "depends only on" the areal density of the plate facing the air should be qualified as holding in the limit epsilon -> 0, since Eq. (35) explicitly contains m1.
  2. [Section VI A] The sentence "Simulations based on the theory assumes that the rib mass and thickness are negligible" is ambiguous: the analytical theory neglects rib mass, while the COMSOL model includes it. Please clarify which curves correspond to which model.
  3. [Eq. (37)] The displayed formula has an unbalanced parenthesis in the first term; as typeset, "n( (D_hat_1 n^4 - m1/m2 - rho_w d/(m2 2 pi n))^{-1}" is missing a closing bracket. Please correct the notation.
  4. [Section VI C] The text "w_bar_1 sqrt(epsilon) w_bar_2" is missing a division operator; it should read "w_bar_1 / (sqrt(epsilon) w_bar_2)".

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No material circularity: total-transmission conditions are derived from the scattering solution; the self-cited flex-layer stiffness is a non-load-bearing interpretive link, not an input.

full rationale

The central design equations are not fitted or definitional. Section V starts from the explicit scattering solution, Eqs. (15)-(26), takes the stated rigid-and-massless rib limit ("In the limit that the ribs are rigid, 1/Z0- -> 0, and massless, Z0+ -> 0"), sets R = 0, and solves the real and imaginary parts of Gamma(0) to obtain the frequency condition, Eqs. (34)/(36), and the rib-spacing condition, Eq. (37). Equation (39) follows from Eq. (37) by an analytical infinite-series identity (sum 1/n^4 = pi^4/90) and the small-epsilon approximation, not from fitting to COMSOL. The COMSOL runs are full-wave finite-element simulations of the designed geometry; although they share the rigid-rib idealization with the analytics, the comparison involves no curve fitting or parameter tuning. The self-citation [21] supplies the low-frequency quasistatic stiffness kappa_j = 720 D_j/d^4, but it appears in Section V B only after Eq. (38), as an interpretation: "The relation (38)_2 for d can be understood in terms of the effective quasistatic stiffness ... introduced in [21]". The derivation of Eq. (38) from Eq. (37) does not depend on [21], so the citation is not load-bearing. The limitation acknowledged near the end of Section VI A ("Simulations based on the theory assumes that the rib mass and thickness are negligible. These assumptions can lead to slight deviations...") is a validity gap for realistic finite-mass ribs, not a circular reduction: the ideal-limit formulas are derived, not assumed as the output. Appendix B is a conditional necessary-condition derivation: under the assumption of total transmission it uses p1 = Zw*vbar1 and p2 = Za*vbar2 to re-derive Eq. (34), and Section VI C explicitly notes the approximate status of the intermediate plane-wave velocity relation. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained; the score of 1 reflects only the minor, non-load-bearing self-citation, not any circular step.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The design uses existing materials and standard acoustics and plate theory. No new physical entities are introduced. The free parameters are design inputs chosen for the examples, not fitted constants. The key idealizations are the rigid massless rib assumption and the vacuum gap, both acknowledged and partially relaxed in the paper.

free parameters (2)
  • h1 (thickness of water-side plate) = 1 mm in main examples; 0.5 and 1.5 mm in parametric study
    Chosen by hand to illustrate the design. The formulas support arbitrary h1, so it is an input, not a fitted constant.
  • f0 (design transmission frequency) = 250, 500, 1000 Hz examples; 150 Hz in the air-effect study
    The target frequency is chosen first, then h2 and d are computed from Eqs. (36) and (37). It is a design input, not fitted to any measured output.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Kirchhoff plate theory describes the flexural motion of the two plates.
    Eqs. (13) use the thin-plate operator Lj w = Dj w'''' - mj omega^2 w. The paper notes Mindlin theory would give similar results.
  • domain assumption The ribs are rigid and massless, and their contacts with the plates are point-like, for the derivation of the transmission conditions.
    Section V assumes 1/Z0- -> 0 and Z0+ -> 0 before Eq. (32). Finite rib mass and compliance are neglected in the closed-form conditions.
  • domain assumption The gap between the plates is a vacuum (no fluid loading in the gap).
    Figure 3 states the intermediate space is assumed vacuum; entrained air is treated afterwards in Section VI D as a correction.
  • domain assumption Only the fundamental (m=0) Fourier mode propagates in the water and air; higher Bragg orders are evanescent.
    Stated in Section IV B: 'We assume that only the fundamental m=0 scattered modes propagate in air and water.' Requires f d / c_a < 1, satisfied in examples.
  • domain assumption The air-to-water impedance ratio epsilon = Za/Zw is small and used for asymptotic simplification.
    Defined in Eq. (3) and used throughout to replace exact expressions by leading terms.
  • domain assumption The acoustic media are linear, inviscid fluids with plane-wave radiation; attenuation in air and water is ignored in the main model.
    The scattered pressure representation Eq. (10) uses lossless fluid impedances.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Total acoustic transmission between fluids using a solid material with emphasis on the air-water interface." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6HKI3L7R

@misc{pith2026250207723,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Total acoustic transmission between fluids using a solid material with emphasis on the air-water interface},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6HKI3L7R}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.07723}
}
abstract

Total acoustic transmission between water and air is modeled using a purely solid interface comprising two elastic plates separated by periodically spaced ribs. The frequency of full transmission depends only on, and is inversely proportional to, the areal density of the plate facing the air. Total transmission also requires a specific dependence of the rib spacing on the bending stiffness of the two plates. These relations are the result of an explicit analytical solution for the transmitted and reflected acoustic waves combined with asymptotic approximations based on the small parameter defined by the air-to-water impedance ratio. Surprisingly, the total transmission effect is almost independent of the angle of incidence, even though the transmission conditions are predicated on normal incidence. Parametric studies are performed to examine the effect on the frequency bandwidth and Q-factor of the acoustic transmissivity. A lower bound for the Q-factor of $30.6$ is simply related to the water-air impedance ratio.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.07723 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. A spring-mass resonator separating semi-infinite water on the left and air on the right. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Transmitted energy for unit incident energy from the water side, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. A plane wave is incident from the water side of the asymmetric panel. The plates are [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The transmitted acoustic energy E vs frequency for the flex-layer model based on optimal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Optimal values for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. The effect of varying bending stiffness parameters for plate 1. The solid curves are theory [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. The effect of varying [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: shows the plate displacements over one cycle for transmission frequency f0 = 500 Hz. It is clear that plate 2 on the air side moves like a plane wave, but the same is not true for plate 1. The dramatic difference in the plate motions is better appreciated from the asso…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. The mode shape of plate 1 facing water at full transmission for three transmission fre [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. The effect of air between the plates as a function of the rib length [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_10.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

27 extracted references · 27 canonical work pages

  1. [21]

    2023 Water–air acoustic communication based on broadband impedance matching

    Zhou P, Jia H, Bi Y, Yang Y, Yang Y, Zhang P, Yang J. 2023 Water–air acoustic communication based on broadband impedance matching. Applied Physics Letters 123. (10.1063/5.0168562)

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0168562 2023

  2. [1]

    This introduces the mass degree of freedom, u, its displacement in the x−direction, and Trib = 1 2 mω2u2, U rib = 1 2 2κ u − w−(0) 2 + u − w+(0) 2

    A mass-spring rib model The rib is a mass m with springs of stiffness 2 κ on either side that attach to the plates, so the static effective stiffness is κ. This introduces the mass degree of freedom, u, its displacement in the x−direction, and Trib = 1 2 mω2u2, U rib = 1 2 2κ u − w−(0) 2 + u − w+(0) 2 . (A4) Variation of (A1) with respect to the rib mass ...

    work page

  3. [2]

    The continuous rib model The rib is a plate in tension/compression with parameters ρ and E located between x = −L/2 and x = L/2. The time harmonic displacement is u(x) = w+(0) + w−(0) cos kx 2 cosk L 2 + w+(0) − w−(0) sin kx 2 sink L 2 (A8) where k = ω/c, c = p E/ρ, and Trib = Z L 2 − L 2 1 2 ρh ω2 u2 d x, U rib = Z L 2 − L 2 1 2 Eh u2 ,x d x. (A9) Hence,...

    work page

  4. [3]

    1942 Impedance matching means for mechanical waves

    Hansell CW. 1942 Impedance matching means for mechanical waves. US Patent 2,430,013

    work page 1942

  5. [4]

    1950 Principles and Application of Waveguide Transmission

    Southworth GC. 1950 Principles and Application of Waveguide Transmission. D. Van Nos- trand Co., Inc., New York, N. Y

    work page 1950

  6. [5]

    1978 The design of efficient broad-band piezoelectric transducers

    Desilets C, Fraser J, Kino G. 1978 The design of efficient broad-band piezoelectric transducers. IEEE Transactions on Sonics and Ultrasonics25, 115–125. (10.1109/t-su.1978.31001)

    work page arXiv 1978

  7. [6]

    2018 Metasurface for Water-to-Air Sound Transmission

    Bok E, Park JJ, Choi H, Han CK, Wright OB, Lee SH. 2018 Metasurface for Water-to-Air Sound Transmission. Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 044302. (10.1103/physrevlett.120.044302)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.120.044302 2018

  8. [7]

    2011 Enhanced and reduced transmission of acoustic waves with bubble meta-screens

    Bretagne A, Tourin A, Leroy V. 2011 Enhanced and reduced transmission of acoustic waves with bubble meta-screens. Applied Physics Letters99, 221906. (10.1063/1.3663623)

    work page doi:10.1063/1.3663623 2011

Show all 27 references
  1. [8]

    2017 Low-frequency sound transmission through rough bubbly air-water interface at the sea surface

    Bolghasi A, Ghadimi P, Chekab MAF. 2017 Low-frequency sound transmission through rough bubbly air-water interface at the sea surface. Journal of Low Frequency Noise, Vibration and Active Control 36, 319–338. (10.1177/1461348417744295) 24

    2017 doi

  2. [9]

    2019 Bubble Architectures for Locally Resonant Acoustic Metamaterials

    Cai Z, Zhao S, Huang Z, Li Z, Su M, Zhang Z, Zhao Z, Hu X, Wang Y, Song Y. 2019 Bubble Architectures for Locally Resonant Acoustic Metamaterials. Advanced Functional Materials

    2019

  3. [10]

    2021a Tunable Fluid-Type Metasurface for Wide-Angle and Multifrequency Water-Air Acoustic Transmission

    Huang Z, Zhao S, Zhang Y, Cai Z, Li Z, Xiao J, Su M, Guo Q, Zhang C, Pan Y, Cai X, Song Y, Yang J. 2021a Tunable Fluid-Type Metasurface for Wide-Angle and Multifrequency Water-Air Acoustic Transmission. Research 2021. (10.34133/2021/9757943)

    2021 doi

  4. [11]

    2020 Sound propagation across the air water interface by a critically coupled resonant bubble

    Lee T, Iizuka H. 2020 Sound propagation across the air water interface by a critically coupled resonant bubble. Physical Review B102, 104105. (10.1103/physrevb.102.104105)

    2020 doi

  5. [12]

    2023 Tunable sound transmission through water–air interface by membrane-sealed bubble metasurface

    Gong XT, Zhou HT, Zhang SC, Wang YF, Wang YS. 2023 Tunable sound transmission through water–air interface by membrane-sealed bubble metasurface. Applied Physics Letters

    2023

  6. [13]

    2023 Gradient Impedance Matching Layers Enable Broadband Water-Air Sound Transmission

    Zhou P, Jia H, Bi Y, Yang Y, Yang Y, Zhang P, Yang J. 2023 Gradient Impedance Matching Layers Enable Broadband Water-Air Sound Transmission. Arxiv eprint 2305.07896

    2023 arXiv

  7. [14]

    2021b Lotus Metasurface for Wide-Angle Intermediate-Frequency Water–Air Acoustic Transmission

    Huang Z, Zhao Z, Zhao S, Cai X, Zhang Y, Cai Z, Li H, Li Z, Su M, Zhang C, Pan Y, Song Y, Yang J. 2021b Lotus Metasurface for Wide-Angle Intermediate-Frequency Water–Air Acoustic Transmission. ACS Applied Materials13, 53242–53251. (10.1021/acsami.1c16043)

    doi

  8. [15]

    2023 Remote Water-to-Air Eavesdropping with a Phase-Engineered Impedance Matching Metasurface

    Liu J, Li Z, Liang B, Cheng J, Al` u A. 2023 Remote Water-to-Air Eavesdropping with a Phase-Engineered Impedance Matching Metasurface. Advanced Materials 35. (10.1002/adma.202301799)

    2023 doi

  9. [16]

    2024 Discrete metasurface for extreme sound transmission through water-air interface

    Zhang SC, Zhou HT, Gong XT, Wang YF, Wang YS. 2024 Discrete metasurface for extreme sound transmission through water-air interface. Journal of Sound and Vibration575, 118269. (10.1016/j.jsv.2024.118269)

    2024

  10. [17]

    2018 Networking across boundaries

    Tonolini F, Adib F. 2018 Networking across boundaries. In Proceedings of the 2018 Con- ference of the ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communicationpp. 117–131. ACM. (10.1145/3230543.3230580)

    2018

  11. [18]

    2023 Hybrid Metasurfaces for Perfect Transmission and Customized Manipulation of Sound Across Water–Air Interface

    Zhou HT, Zhang SC, Zhu T, Tian YZ, Wang YF, Wang YS. 2023 Hybrid Metasurfaces for Perfect Transmission and Customized Manipulation of Sound Across Water–Air Interface. Advanced Science. (10.1002/advs.202207181)

    2023 doi

  12. [19]

    2001 Fundamentals of physical acoustics

    Blackstock DT. 2001 Fundamentals of physical acoustics. Acoustical Society of America

    2001

  13. [20]

    2024 Bioinspired Fano-like resonant transmission: frequency selective impedance matching

    Esposito A, Tallarico D, Sayed Ahmed M, Miniaci M, Shahab S, Bergamini A. 2024 Bioinspired Fano-like resonant transmission: frequency selective impedance matching. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics57, 155402. (10.1088/1361-6463/ad1c86) 25

    2024 doi

  14. [22]

    2000 Fundamentals of Acoustics

    Kinsler LE, Frey AR, Coppens AB, Sanders JV. 2000 Fundamentals of Acoustics. Wiley fourth edition

    2000

  15. [23]

    1978 Waves in Fluids

    Lighthill J. 1978 Waves in Fluids. Cambridge University Press

    1978

  16. [24]

    2024 Analytical solutions for single and multiple scattering from rib-stiffened plates in water

    Bakhtiary Yekta H, Norris AN. 2024 Analytical solutions for single and multiple scattering from rib-stiffened plates in water. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America155, 2247–2256. (10.1121/10.0025388)

    2024 doi

  17. [26]

    1973 Sound radiation from an infinite plate with periodic inhomogeneities

    Evseev V. 1973 Sound radiation from an infinite plate with periodic inhomogeneities. Soviet Physics Acoustics -USSR19, 226–229

    1973

  18. [27]

    1977 Sound transmission through periodically framed parallel plates

    Lin GF, Garrelick JM. 1977 Sound transmission through periodically framed parallel plates. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America61, 1014–1018. (10.1121/1.381386) 26

    1977 doi

  19. [29]

    (10.1002/adfm.201906984)

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.