Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 minor 1 cited by

Right-handed neutrinos: seesaw models and signatures

T0 review · 0 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This review argues that adding right-handed neutrinos is the minimal renormalizable extension of the Standard Model that accounts for all neutrino observables, and that this extension predicts heavy neutral leptons whose observability is…

desk verdict A clear, honest pedagogical review of seesaw models; its 'predictions' are those of a fitted constrained ansatz, which is a framing caveat rather than a fatal flaw. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.07877 v3 pith:C7UAJRJE submitted 2025-02-11 hep-ph

Stephen F King This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-ph
keywords NeutrinophysicsBeyondtheStandardModelRight-handedneutrinosSterileSeesawmechanismHeavyneutralleptonsLeptonflavourviolationInverse
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper is a pedagogical review arguing that adding right-handed neutrinos to the Standard Model is the minimal renormalizable way to generate the tiny neutrino masses measured in oscillation experiments, through the seesaw mechanism. Unlike the effective Weinberg operator, this extension makes a concrete prediction: heavy neutral leptons, the heavy mass eigenstates that are mostly right-handed neutrinos, whose couplings to ordinary matter are set by small heavy-light mixing angles. The review shows how different arrangements of right-handed neutrino masses lead to very different phenomenology: in constrained sequential dominance the heavy leptons are practically unobservable but mixing angles can be predicted, while in off-diagonal or inverse-seesaw models the heavy states can be light and mixed enough to be searched for at experiments. The upshot is that the seesaw idea converts a neutrino-mass puzzle into a well-motivated, model-dependent experimental programme.

What carries the argument

The central object is the seesaw mass matrix in the $(\nu_L^c,\nu_R)$ basis, whose diagonalization yields the light Majorana mass $m_\nu\simeq -m_D M_R^{-1} m_D^T$ and the heavy-light mixing matrix $\theta\simeq m_D M_R^{-1}$ that controls every observable signature of the heavy neutral leptons. In the single-right-handed-neutrino case the mechanism reduces to $m_{\rm eff}\simeq m_D^2/M_R$ and $\theta\simeq m_D/M_R$, the basic "seesaw line" connecting Dirac mass, right-handed mass, and the observed sub-eV scale. For predictive purposes the load-bearing construction is constrained sequential dominance (CSD), in which one right-handed neutrino dominates the atmospheric mass and a second the solar mass, with the Dirac texture fixed by symmetry; this turns the parameter-dense seesaw into a model whose remaining inputs are fixed by $\theta_{13}$, $\Delta m^2_{21}$ and $\Delta m^2_{31}$, yielding predictions for $\theta_{23}$, $\delta$ and $\theta_{12}$. For the observable-heavy-lepton variants, the analogous machinery is the inverse seesaw formula $m_\nu = m_D (M^T)^{-1} \mu M^{-1} m_D^T$, where the small singlet Majorana mass $\mu$ controls the mixing independently of the heavy scale.

What would settle it

If future long-baseline oscillation experiments measure $\theta_{23}$ and $\delta$ with precision and the values fall outside all the CSD($n$) prediction windows in Table 1, the constrained-sequential-dominance claim is falsified. Likewise, discovering heavy neutral leptons with $|U_{\ell N}|^2 \gtrsim 10^{-6}$ in the GeV–TeV range would falsify the high-scale sequential-dominance class of models.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central claim is that the addition of right-handed neutrinos is a well-motivated and minimal extension of the Standard Model capable of accounting for all neutrino observables while providing a potentially testable prediction: heavy neutral leptons. The mechanism is the type-I seesaw formula $m_\nu \simeq -m_D M_R^{-1} m_D^T$, whose single-family version gives $m_{\rm eff}\simeq m_D^2/M_R$ and a heavy-light mixing angle $\theta\simeq m_D/M_R$; because the predicted new particles couple through $\theta$, their visibility is model dependent. In the canonical three-right-handed-neutrino picture the seesaw parameters are plentiful, but under constrained sequential dominance (CSD), with the Dirac mass texture $(0,e,e\;;\;a,na,(n-2)a)$, the three best-measured observables fix the remaining inputs and the less well-measured quantities $\theta_{23}$, $\delta$ and $\theta_{12}$ become predictions. The review also argues that with degenerate off-diagonal right-handed masses the two states form a single heavy Dirac neutrino with potentially observable mixing, and that in the inverse seesaw the mixing is controlled by a small lepton-number-violating mass $\mu$, allowing observable heavy neutral leptons. The concluding claim is that the seesaw framework accounts for neutrino data and gives experiment a concrete target, though which signature appears depends on the assumed mass structure.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that some high-energy symmetry fixes the Dirac mass matrix to the constrained texture of Eq. (89); if no such ultraviolet theory exists, the predicted mixing angles are just a fit to data.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If right-handed neutrinos exist, the effective lepton mixing matrix is not exactly unitary; the deviation is of order $\theta\theta^\dagger$ and can be probed through lepton flavour violation such as $\mu\to e\gamma$ and through electroweak precision data.
  • In the two-right-handed-neutrino limit the lightest neutrino mass is predicted to be zero, and under constrained sequential dominance the measured values of $\theta_{13}$, $\Delta m^2_{21}$ and $\Delta m^2_{31}$ fix $\theta_{23}$, $\delta$ and $\theta_{12}$, as tabulated in the paper.
  • High-scale sequential-dominance models predict heavy-light mixings of order $10^{-10}(1\,\mathrm{GeV}/M)$, far below planned sensitivities, so a discovery of heavy neutral leptons would disfavour this whole class.
  • Models with off-diagonal right-handed masses (type Ib seesaw or Majoron) or with extra singlets (inverse seesaw) can place heavy neutral leptons in the GeV–TeV range with observable couplings, testable in collider searches, lepton flavour violation, and neutrinoless double beta decay.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: a sufficiently precise measurement of $\theta_{23}$ and $\delta$ that falls outside all CSD($n$) windows in Table 1 would falsify the constrained sequential dominance programme even before any heavy neutral lepton search reports.
  • Beyond the paper: a null result in heavy-neutral-lepton searches would not refute the seesaw idea, but would push the viable parameter space toward high-scale models; a discovery would measure seesaw parameters that light-neutrino data alone cannot determine.
  • Beyond the paper: the paper's closing observation that charged-fermion mass hierarchies remain unexplained suggests the same texture-plus-seesaw logic could be carried over to quark and charged-lepton masses; one testable extension would be to look for vector-like fermion partners whose masses follow the same patterned textures.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper is a pedagogical review of seesaw models built on right-handed neutrinos. It begins with the Standard Model lepton sector and the Weinberg operator, then develops the single right-handed neutrino seesaw, the canonical three right-handed neutrino parametrization with its non-unitarity and heavy-neutral-lepton phenomenology, the minimal two right-handed neutrino case with sequential dominance and the alternative of a heavy Dirac neutrino, and finally extra singlet neutrinos leading to double and inverse seesaw mechanisms. The central claim, stated most explicitly in Section 7, is that adding right-handed neutrinos is a well-motivated, minimal extension of the Standard Model that accounts for all neutrino observables and predicts heavy neutral leptons, whose observability is highly model dependent. The paper also presents the constrained sequential dominance (CSD(n)) / Littlest Seesaw ansatz as a source of concrete mixing-angle predictions, and the inverse seesaw as a way to make the heavy neutral leptons potentially observable.

Significance. If judged as a review article, the paper succeeds in presenting the standard seesaw formalism clearly and correctly. Its strengths are the careful derivations of the 2x2 and 3x3 seesaw diagonalizations, the Casas-Ibarra parametrization, the non-unitarity formalism, the sequential dominance hierarchy, and the inverse seesaw formulas; these are standard but are reproduced with enough detail to be useful to a broad readership. The paper is also honest about the main caveat: it repeatedly states that the observability of heavy neutral leptons is model dependent and that the constrained mixing-angle predictions require the CSD ansatz and an underlying UV model. The review does not claim new calculations, and the central claim is not undermined by the flexibility of the seesaw parameter space. The main weakness is a framing issue in the presentation of Table 1, where model-dependent fits are described as 'genuine predictions' without the conditional character being stated in the table caption itself; this is a presentation issue rather than a technical error.

minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 5.2, Eq. (89) and Table 1] The term 'genuine predictions' in the text accompanying Table 1 should be explicitly qualified as predictions of the CSD(n) ansatz, not of the seesaw mechanism in general. The surrounding discussion does cite vacuum-alignment and modular-symmetry UV models, but the table caption and the sentence introducing the table could be read as making a general claim; a one-sentence clarification would remove this ambiguity.
  2. [Section 5.2, before Eq. (89)] The phrase 'called constrained dominance sequence (CSD)' appears to be a typo for 'constrained sequential dominance (CSD)', which is the established terminology and matches the section heading and the paper's own usage elsewhere.
  3. [Abstract and Section 1] The abstract states that heavy neutral leptons 'can detected directly or indirectly'; the verb should be 'can be detected'.
  4. [Section 7] The sentence 'They may show their presence virtually in loops which contribute for example to µ→γ' should read 'µ→eγ', since the radiative process discussed in Section 4.3 is µ→eγ, not a generic µ→γ transition.
  5. [Section 2.2, around Eqs. (27)-(29)] The sentence about removing 'three of the six phases' is correct, but the wording may confuse readers who count the PMNS matrix as having one Dirac phase and two Majorana phases; consider adding a brief restatement that three physical phases remain in U_PMNS.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the seesaw derivations are self-contained, and the constrained-model 'predictions' are clearly labelled as model-dependent fits within a stated parameter-counting logic.

full rationale

The paper is a pedagogical review, not an original derivation, and its central claims are supported by self-contained algebra. The single-right-handed-neutrino seesaw result (Eqs. 45-50) follows directly from diagonalising the 2x2 mass matrix, and the three-right-handed-neutrino parametrisation (Eq. 63) is the standard Casas-Ibarra decomposition, cited to independent work. The 'prediction of heavy neutral leptons' is a direct consequence of introducing right-handed neutrino fields that mix with active neutrinos; it is not a quantity fitted from data, and the text repeatedly stresses that the observability of these states is highly model dependent. The constrained sequential dominance (CSD) discussion is the only place where a reader might see a fitted parametrisation being called predictive, but the paper is explicit about the logic: for a fixed integer/real n, the three parameters m_a, m_b, eta are fixed by the best-measured observables theta_13, Delta m^2_21 and Delta m^2_31, leaving theta_23, delta and theta_12 as non-trivial consequences of the model. This is genuine parameter-counting predictivity within an assumed texture, not a statistical tautology. The text even flags the limitation of bottom-up reverse engineering ('However ultimately this reverse engineering approach does not tell us anything about the physics responsible for m_D in the first place') and points to external vacuum-alignment and modular-symmetry constructions for the origin of CSD(n). The heavy reliance on the author's own prior papers is normal for a solo review of a research programme, and the cited SD/CSD results are used to attribute the models rather than as the sole load-bearing justification for the review's main pedagogical claims. No equation in the paper reduces by construction to its own input, and no fitted parameter is relabelled as a prediction without the parameter-counting being stated. Accordingly, there is no significant circularity; at most there is a minor stylistic self-citation pattern that does not affect the validity of the central exposition.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 3 invented entities

The central claim of the review rests on the existence and properties of hypothetical particles (right-handed neutrinos, extra singlets, and in some models the Majoron) and on the seesaw formula. The predictive models reviewed also depend on hand-chosen parameters such as the CSD parameter n and the small singlet masses mu, which are fitted to existing neutrino data rather than derived.

free parameters (4)
  • n (CSD parameter) = approximately 3 (variants 2.5 and 3.45)
    In the constrained sequential dominance ansatz, the real number n in Eq. (89) is chosen by hand to match the measured theta_13, Delta m^2_21, and Delta m^2_31; discrete values are motivated by specific UV models.
  • m_a, m_b, eta = fixed by theta_13, Delta m^2_21, Delta m^2_31
    In Eq. (90), these three parameters are fitted to the best-measured observables to yield the 'predictions' for theta_23, delta, and theta_12 in Table 1.
  • Right-handed neutrino masses and Dirac couplings in sequential dominance = not specified
    In the SD model, combinations like |e|^2/M_atm and |a|^2/M_sol set the neutrino masses; these are not predicted but fitted to data.
  • Inverse seesaw singlet masses mu_atm, mu_sol = chosen small (e.g., keV)
    In Eq. (133), the heavy-light mixing angles scale as m_2/mu; mu is chosen to enhance observability while fitting light neutrino masses.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Right-handed neutrinos exist as electroweak singlet fermions
    The whole paper is predicated on adding nu_R fields to the Standard Model; this is not experimentally established.
  • domain assumption Neutrino masses are Majorana in the seesaw models
    The seesaw mechanism assumes lepton number violation via Majorana mass terms; this remains unconfirmed since neutrinoless double beta decay has not been observed.
  • standard math Standard seesaw formula m_nu = -m_D M_R^{-1} m_D^T
    Derived by integrating out heavy right-handed neutrinos; a standard result used throughout the paper.
  • ad hoc to paper CSD texture with n approximately 3 is a valid ansatz
    Eq. (89) assumes a specific texture, motivated by UV models cited elsewhere but not derived in this review.
  • ad hoc to paper Extra singlet neutrinos S_R have very small Majorana masses mu in the inverse seesaw
    In Section 6, mu is assumed to be tiny to produce enhanced mixing; this is an assumption, not a prediction.
invented entities (3)
  • Right-handed neutrinos (nu_R)
    purpose: Generate light neutrino masses via seesaw and provide heavy neutral lepton candidates
    No direct detection; indirect motivation from neutrino oscillations. The paper reviews them rather than inventing them.
  • Extra singlet neutrinos (S_R)
    purpose: Enable inverse or double seesaw and make heavy-light mixing angles large
    Hypothetical fermions with no Standard Model charges; not yet observed.
  • Majoron (Phi)
    purpose: Spontaneously break lepton number and generate off-diagonal right-handed neutrino masses
    Goldstone boson; experimentally unobserved. The paper describes the model from prior work.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Right-handed neutrinos: seesaw models and signatures." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/C7UAJRJE

@misc{pith2026250207877,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Right-handed neutrinos: seesaw models and signatures},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/C7UAJRJE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.07877}
}
read the original abstract

We give a pedagogical introduction to right-handed neutrinos as a simple extension to the Standard Model (SM), focussing on seesaw models and their possible experimental signatures. We preface this with a review of the lepton sector of the SM, where charged lepton masses arise from Yukawa couplings and neutrino Majorana masses from the Weinberg operator, leading to a unitary lepton mixing matrix. We first introduce a single right-handed neutrino and the seesaw mechanism, yielding a heavy neutral lepton, then generalise the results to the canonical case of three right-handed neutrinos within a general parameterisation, leading to non-unitary lepton mixing and three heavy neutral leptons, which can detected directly or indirectly via lepton flavour violation or neutrinoless double beta decay. We show how the sequential dominance of three right-handed neutrinos with diagonal masses naturally leads to an effective two right-handed neutrino model with lepton mixing angle predictions in the constrained cases, but unobservable heavy neutral leptons. On the other hand, with degenerate off-diagonal masses, the two right-handed neutrinos can form a single heavy and observable Dirac neutrino, within a two Higgs doublet or Majoron model. Finally we discuss extra singlet neutrinos which can lead to either a double seesaw or an inverse seesaw, depending on their Majorana masses, where the latter allows observable heavy neutral leptons, and the possibility of a minimal inverse seesaw model where mixing angles can be predicted.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.07877 by the authors.

Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Diagram showing the extra neutrino contributions to gy g in the one loop diagram above. The couplings are given in Eq. 71 and ϕ − is the Goldstone boson compo Fiidtd f[139] [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Representative Feynman diagrams of same-sign 𝓁+𝓁′+ production in 𝑊 +𝑊 + scattering mediated by (a) a Majorana neutrino 𝑁 and (b) the dimension-5 Weinberg operator. The corresponding diagrams with negatively–charged leptons are also considered. clude new, heavy leptons or extended scalar sectors, collectively known as Seesaw mechanism, or in theories with extended gauge sectors (e.g. Left-Right Symmetric Model, Grand… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Neutrinoless double beta decay rates and the $3 + 2$ scenario

    hep-ph 2025-05 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

    A proceedings review of the author's prior EFT calculation of neutrinoless double beta decay and of a two-sterile-neutrino model, containing no new derivation.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

229 extracted references · 12 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    S. L. Glashow, Nucl. Phys.22(1961), 579-588 doi:10.1016/0029-5582(61)90469-2

    doi:10.1016/0029-5582(61)90469-2 1961

  2. [2]

    Weinberg, Phys

    S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett.19(1967), 1264-1266 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.19.1264

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.19.1264 1967

  3. [3]

    Salam, Conf

    A. Salam, Conf. Proc. C680519(1968), 367-377 doi:10.1142/9789812795915 0034

    work page doi:10.1142/9789812795915 1968

  4. [4]

    S. L. Glashow, J. Iliopoulos and L. Maiani, Phys. Rev. D2(1970), 1285-1292 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.2.1285

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.2.1285 1970

  5. [5]

    P . W. Higgs, Phys. Rev. Lett.13(1964), 508-509 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.13.508

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.13.508 1964

  6. [6]

    G. S. Guralnik, C. R. Hagen and T. W. B. Kibble, Phys. Rev. Lett.13(1964), 585-587 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.13.585

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.13.585 1964

  7. [7]

    Englert and R

    F . Englert and R. Brout, Phys. Rev. Lett.13(1964), 321-323 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.13.321

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.13.321 1964

  8. [8]

    T. W. B. Kibble, Phys. Rev.155(1967), 1554-1561 doi:10.1103/PhysRev.155.1554

    doi:10.1103/physrev.155.1554 1967

Show all 229 references
  1. [9]

    Kajita, Rev

    T. Kajita, Rev. Mod. Phys.88(2016) no.3, 030501 doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.88.030501

    2016 doi

  2. [10]

    A. B. McDonald, Rev. Mod. Phys.88(2016) no.3, 030502 doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.88.030502

    2016 doi

  3. [11]

    Fukudaet al.[Super-Kamiokande], Phys

    Y . Fukudaet al.[Super-Kamiokande], Phys. Rev. Lett.81(1998), 1562-1567 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.1562 [arXiv:hep-ex/9807003 [hep-ex]]

    1998 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Q. R. Ahmadet al.[SNO], Phys. Rev. Lett.87(2001), 071301 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.071301 [arXiv:nucl-ex/0106015 [nucl-ex]]

    2001 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Eguchiet al.[KamLAND], Phys

    K. Eguchiet al.[KamLAND], Phys. Rev. Lett.90(2003), 021802 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.021802 [arXiv:hep-ex/0212021 [hep-ex]]

    2003 arXiv

  6. [14]

    F . P . Anet al.[Daya Bay], Phys. Rev. Lett.108(2012), 171803 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.171803 [arXiv:1203.1669 [hep-ex]]

    2012 arXiv

  7. [15]

    J. K. Ahnet al.[RENO], Phys. Rev. Lett.108(2012), 191802 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.191802 [arXiv:1204.0626 [hep-ex]]

    2012 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Abeet al.[T2K], Phys

    K. Abeet al.[T2K], Phys. Rev. Lett.107(2011), 041801 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.041801 [arXiv:1106.2822 [hep-ex]]

    2011 arXiv

  9. [17]

    P . B. Denton, [arXiv:2501.08374 [hep-ph]]

  10. [18]

    Abeet al.[T2K], Nucl

    K. Abeet al.[T2K], Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A659(2011), 106-135 doi:10.1016/j.nima.2011.06.067 [arXiv:1106.1238 [physics.ins-det]]. 26Right-handed neutrinos: seesaw models and signatures

    2011

  11. [19]

    D. S. Ayreset al.[NOvA], [arXiv:hep-ex/0503053 [hep-ex]]

    arXiv

  12. [20]

    Adeyet al.[Daya Bay], Phys

    D. Adeyet al.[Daya Bay], Phys. Rev. Lett.121(2018) no.24, 241805 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.241805 [arXiv:1809.02261 [hep-ex]]

    2018 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Anet al.[JUNO], J

    F . Anet al.[JUNO], J. Phys. G43(2016) no.3, 030401 doi:10.1088/0954-3899/43/3/030401 [arXiv:1507.05613 [physics.ins-det]]

    2016 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Baket al.[RENO], Phys

    G. Baket al.[RENO], Phys. Rev. Lett.121(2018) no.20, 201801 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.201801 [arXiv:1806.00248 [hep-ex]]

    2018 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Abeet al.[Hyper-Kamiokande Proto-], PTEP2015(2015), 053C02 doi:10.1093/ptep/ptv061 [arXiv:1502.05199 [hep-ex]]

    K. Abeet al.[Hyper-Kamiokande Proto-], PTEP2015(2015), 053C02 doi:10.1093/ptep/ptv061 [arXiv:1502.05199 [hep-ex]]

    2015 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Acciarriet al.[DUNE], [arXiv:1512.06148 [physics.ins-det]]

    R. Acciarriet al.[DUNE], [arXiv:1512.06148 [physics.ins-det]]

  17. [25]

    Abiet al.[DUNE], [arXiv:2002.03005 [hep-ex]]

    B. Abiet al.[DUNE], [arXiv:2002.03005 [hep-ex]]

    2002

  18. [26]

    Akeret al.[KATRIN], Phys

    M. Akeret al.[KATRIN], Phys. Rev. Lett.123(2019) no.22, 221802 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.221802 [arXiv:1909.06048 [hep-ex]]

    2019

  19. [27]

    Akeret al.[KATRIN], Nature Phys.18(2022) no.2, 160-166 doi:10.1038/s41567-021-01463-1 [arXiv:2105.08533 [hep-ex]]

    M. Akeret al.[KATRIN], Nature Phys.18(2022) no.2, 160-166 doi:10.1038/s41567-021-01463-1 [arXiv:2105.08533 [hep-ex]]

    2022 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Akeret al.[KATRIN], Science388(2025) no.6743, adq9592 doi:10.1126/science.adq9592 [arXiv:2406.13516 [nucl-ex]]

    M. Akeret al.[KATRIN], Science388(2025) no.6743, adq9592 doi:10.1126/science.adq9592 [arXiv:2406.13516 [nucl-ex]]

    2025

  21. [29]

    Abeet al.[KamLAND-Zen], Phys

    S. Abeet al.[KamLAND-Zen], Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2023) no.5, 051801 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.051801 [arXiv:2203.02139 [hep-ex]]

    2023

  22. [30]

    Agostiniet al.[GERDA], Phys

    M. Agostiniet al.[GERDA], Phys. Rev. Lett.125(2020) no.25, 252502 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.252502 [arXiv:2009.06079 [nucl-ex]]

    2020 arXiv

  23. [31]

    D. Q. Adamset al.[CUORE], Phys. Rev. Lett.124(2020) no.12, 122501 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.122501 [arXiv:1912.10966 [nucl-ex]]

    2020 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Antonet al.[EXO-200], Phys

    G. Antonet al.[EXO-200], Phys. Rev. Lett.123(2019) no.16, 161802 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.161802 [arXiv:1906.02723 [hep-ex]]

    2019 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Adhikariet al.[nEXO], J

    G. Adhikariet al.[nEXO], J. Phys. G49(2022) no.1, 015104 doi:10.1088/1361-6471/ac3631 [arXiv:2106.16243 [nucl-ex]]

    2022 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Abgrallet al.[LEGEND], [arXiv:2107.11462 [physics.ins-det]]

    N. Abgrallet al.[LEGEND], [arXiv:2107.11462 [physics.ins-det]]

    arXiv

  27. [35]

    Nath and P

    P . Nath and P . Fileviez Perez, Phys. Rept.441(2007), 191-317 doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2007.02.010 [arXiv:hep-ph/0601023 [hep-ph]]

    2007 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Abada, C

    A. Abada, C. Biggio, F . Bonnet, M. B. Gavela and T. Hambye, JHEP12(2007), 061 doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/12/061 [arXiv:0707.4058 [hep-ph]]

    2007 arXiv

  29. [37]

    F . F . Deppisch, P . S. Bhupal Dev and A. Pilaftsis, New J. Phys.17(2015) no.7, 075019 doi:10.1088/1367-2630/17/7/075019 [arXiv:1502.06541 [hep-ph]]

    2015 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Y . Cai, J. Herrero-Garc ´ıa, M. A. Schmidt, A. Vicente and R. R. Volkas, Front. in Phys.5(2017), 63 doi:10.3389/fphy.2017.00063 [arXiv:1706.08524 [hep-ph]]

    2017

  31. [39]

    Y . Cai, T. Han, T. Li and R. Ruiz, Front. in Phys.6(2018), 40 doi:10.3389/fphy.2018.00040 [arXiv:1711.02180 [hep-ph]]

    2018

  32. [40]

    Agrawal, M

    P . Agrawal, M. Bauer, J. Beacham, A. Berlin, A. Boyarsky, S. Cebrian, X. Cid-Vidal, D. d’Enterria, A. De Roeck and M. Drewes,et al.Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) no.11, 1015 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09703-7 [arXiv:2102.12143 [hep-ph]]

    2021 arXiv

  33. [41]

    T. Han, J. Liao, H. Liu, D. Marfatia and R. Ruiz, [arXiv:2203.06131 [hep-ph]]

    arXiv

  34. [42]

    Georgi and S

    H. Georgi and S. L. Glashow, Phys. Rev. Lett.32(1974), 438-441 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.32.438

    1974 doi

  35. [43]

    J. C. Pati and A. Salam, Phys. Rev. D10(1974), 275-289 [erratum: Phys. Rev. D11(1975), 703-703] doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.10.275

    1974 doi

  36. [44]

    Fritzsch and P

    H. Fritzsch and P . Minkowski, Annals Phys.93(1975), 193-266 doi:10.1016/0003-4916(75)90211-0

    1975 doi

  37. [45]

    Senjanovic and R

    G. Senjanovic and R. N. Mohapatra, Phys. Rev. D12(1975), 1502 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.12.1502

    1975 doi

  38. [46]

    S. F . King and T. Y anagida, Prog. Theor. Phys.114(2006), 1035-1043 doi:10.1143/PTP .114.1035 [arXiv:hep-ph/0411030 [hep-ph]]

    2006 arXiv

  39. [47]

    S. J. D. King, S. F . King and S. Moretti, Phys. Rev. D97(2018) no.11, 115027 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.97.115027 [arXiv:1712.01279 [hep- ph]]

    2018 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Fukugita and T

    M. Fukugita and T. Y anagida, Phys. Lett. B174(1986), 45-47 doi:10.1016/0370-2693(86)91126-3

    1986 doi

  41. [49]

    J. A. Harvey and M. S. Turner, Phys. Rev. D42(1990), 3344-3349 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.42.3344

    1990 doi

  42. [50]

    M. A. Luty, Phys. Rev. D45(1992), 455-465 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.45.455

    1992 doi

  43. [51]

    Flanz, E

    M. Flanz, E. A. Paschos and U. Sarkar, Phys. Lett. B345(1995), 248-252 [erratum: Phys. Lett. B384(1996), 487-487; erratum: Phys. Lett. B382(1996), 447-447] doi:10.1016/0370-2693(94)01555-Q [arXiv:hep-ph/9411366 [hep-ph]]

    1995 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Plumacher, Z

    M. Plumacher, Z. Phys. C74(1997), 549-559 doi:10.1007/s002880050418 [arXiv:hep-ph/9604229 [hep-ph]]

    1997 arXiv

  45. [53]

    L. Covi, E. Roulet and F . Vissani, Phys. Lett. B384(1996), 169-174 doi:10.1016/0370-2693(96)00817-9 [arXiv:hep-ph/9605319 [hep-ph]]

    1996 arXiv

  46. [54]

    M. Viel, J. Lesgourgues, M. G. Haehnelt, S. Matarrese and A. Riotto, Phys. Rev. D71(2005), 063534 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.71.063534 [arXiv:astro-ph/0501562 [astro-ph]]

    2005 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Merle, Int

    A. Merle, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D22(2013), 1330020 doi:10.1142/S0218271813300206 [arXiv:1302.2625 [hep-ph]]

    2013 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Murayama, H

    H. Murayama, H. Suzuki, T. Y anagida and J. Y okoyama, Phys. Rev. Lett.70(1993), 1912-1915 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.1912

    1993 doi

  49. [57]

    J. R. Ellis, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl.137(2004), 190-205 doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2004.10.070 [arXiv:hep-ph/0403247 [hep-ph]]

    2004 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Antusch, M

    S. Antusch, M. Bastero-Gil, S. F . King and Q. Shafi, Phys. Rev. D71(2005), 083519 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.71.083519 [arXiv:hep- ph/0411298 [hep-ph]]

    2005

  51. [59]

    Afzal, A

    A. Afzal, A. Ghoshal and S. F . King, Phys. Rev. D111(2025) no.2, 023050 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.023050 [arXiv:2407.15082 [astro- ph.CO]]

    2025 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Barbieri, L

    R. Barbieri, L. J. Hall, S. J. Oliver and A. Strumia, Phys. Lett. B625(2005), 189-195 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2005.08.075 [arXiv:hep- ph/0505124 [hep-ph]]

    2005

  53. [61]

    S. F . King, Rept. Prog. Phys.67(2004), 107-158 doi:10.1088/0034-4885/67/2/R01 [arXiv:hep-ph/0310204 [hep-ph]]

    2004 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Strumia and F

    A. Strumia and F . Vissani, [arXiv:hep-ph/0606054 [hep-ph]]

    arXiv

  55. [63]

    Altarelli and F

    G. Altarelli and F . Feruglio, Rev. Mod. Phys.82(2010), 2701-2729 doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.82.2701 [arXiv:1002.0211 [hep-ph]]

    2010 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Morisi and J

    S. Morisi and J. W. F . Valle, Fortsch. Phys.61(2013), 466-492 doi:10.1002/prop.201200125 [arXiv:1206.6678 [hep-ph]]

    2013 arXiv

  57. [65]

    S. F . King and C. Luhn, Rept. Prog. Phys.76(2013), 056201 doi:10.1088/0034-4885/76/5/056201 [arXiv:1301.1340 [hep-ph]]

    2013 arXiv

  58. [66]

    S. F . King, A. Merle, S. Morisi, Y . Shimizu and M. Tanimoto, New J. Phys.16(2014), 045018 doi:10.1088/1367-2630/16/4/045018 [arXiv:1402.4271 [hep-ph]]

    2014 arXiv

  59. [67]

    S. F . King, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.94(2017), 217-256 doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2017.01.003 [arXiv:1701.04413 [hep-ph]]

    2017 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Feruglio and A

    F . Feruglio and A. Romanino, Rev. Mod. Phys.93(2021) no.1, 015007 doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.93.015007 [arXiv:1912.06028 [hep-ph]]

    2021 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Z. z. Xing, Phys. Rept.854(2020), 1-147 doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2020.02.001 [arXiv:1909.09610 [hep-ph]]

    2020 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Chauhan, P

    G. Chauhan, P . S. B. Dev, I. Dubovyk, B. Dziewit, W. Flieger, K. Grzanka, J. Gluza, B. Karmakar and S. Zieba, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.138 (2024), 104126 doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2024.104126 [arXiv:2310.20681 [hep-ph]]

    2024

  63. [71]

    G. J. Ding and S. F . King, Rept. Prog. Phys.87(2024) no.8, 084201 doi:10.1088/1361-6633/ad52a3 [arXiv:2311.09282 [hep-ph]]

    2024 arXiv

  64. [72]

    G. J. Ding and J. W. F . Valle, Phys. Rept.1109(2025), 1-105 doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2024.12.005 [arXiv:2402.16963 [hep-ph]]

    2025 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Navaset al.[Particle Data Group], Phys

    S. Navaset al.[Particle Data Group], Phys. Rev. D110(2024) no.3, 030001 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.030001

    2024 doi

  66. [74]

    Majorana, Nuovo Cim.14(1937), 171-184 doi:10.1007/BF02961314

    E. Majorana, Nuovo Cim.14(1937), 171-184 doi:10.1007/BF02961314

    1937 doi

  67. [75]

    Weinberg, Phys

    S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett.43(1979), 1566-1570 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.43.1566

    1979 doi

  68. [76]

    Z. Maki, M. Nakagawa and S. Sakata, Prog. Theor. Phys.28(1962), 870-880 doi:10.1143/PTP .28.870

    1962 doi

  69. [77]

    Esteban, M

    I. Esteban, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, T. Schwetz and A. Zhou, JHEP09(2020), 178 doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2020)178 [arXiv:2007.14792 [hep-ph]]. Right-handed neutrinos: seesaw models and signatures27

    2020 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Capozzi, E

    F . Capozzi, E. Di Valentino, E. Lisi, A. Marrone, A. Melchiorri and A. Palazzo, Phys. Rev. D104(2021) no.8, 083031 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.083031 [arXiv:2107.00532 [hep-ph]]

    2021 arXiv

  71. [79]

    P . F . de Salas, D. V. Forero, S. Gariazzo, P . Mart´ınez-Mirav´e, O. Mena, C. A. Ternes, M. T ´ortola and J. W. F . Valle, JHEP02(2021), 071 doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2021)071 [arXiv:2006.11237 [hep-ph]]

    2021 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Alamet al.[eBOSS], Phys

    S. Alamet al.[eBOSS], Phys. Rev. D103(2021) no.8, 083533 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.083533 [arXiv:2007.08991 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2021 arXiv

  73. [81]

    Aghanimet al.[Planck], Astron

    N. Aghanimet al.[Planck], Astron. Astrophys.641(2020), A6 [erratum: Astron. Astrophys.652(2021), C4] doi:10.1051/0004- 6361/201833910 [arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2020 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Minkowski, Phys

    P . Minkowski, Phys. Lett. B67(1977), 421-428 doi:10.1016/0370-2693(77)90435-X

    1977 doi

  75. [83]

    Y anagida, Conf

    T. Y anagida, Conf. Proc. C7902131(1979), 95-99 KEK-79-18-95

    1979

  76. [84]

    Gell-Mann, P

    M. Gell-Mann, P . Ramond and R. Slansky, Conf. Proc. C790927(1979), 315-321 [arXiv:1306.4669 [hep-th]]

    1979 arXiv

  77. [85]

    S. L. Glashow, NATO Sci. Ser. B61(1980), 687 doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-7197-7 15

    1980 doi

  78. [86]

    R. N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanovic, Phys. Rev. Lett.44(1980), 912 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.44.912

    1980 doi

  79. [87]

    Schechter and J

    J. Schechter and J. W. F . Valle, Phys. Rev. D22(1980), 2227 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.22.2227

    1980 doi

  80. [88]

    Magg and C

    M. Magg and C. Wetterich, Phys. Lett. B94(1980), 61-64 doi:10.1016/0370-2693(80)90825-4

    1980 doi

  81. [89]

    R. Foot, H. Lew, X. G. He and G. C. Joshi, Z. Phys. C44(1989), 441 doi:10.1007/BF01415558

    1989 doi

  82. [90]

    Ma, Phys

    E. Ma, Phys. Rev. Lett.81(1998), 1171-1174 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.1171 [arXiv:hep-ph/9805219 [hep-ph]]

    1998 arXiv

  83. [91]

    Ma, [arXiv:0905.0221 [hep-ph]]

    E. Ma, [arXiv:0905.0221 [hep-ph]]

    arXiv

  84. [92]

    S. F . King, Phys. Lett. B439(1998), 350-356 doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(98)01055-7 [arXiv:hep-ph/9806440 [hep-ph]]

    1998 arXiv

  85. [93]

    Davidson and S

    S. Davidson and S. F . King, Phys. Lett. B445(1998), 191-198 doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(98)01442-7 [arXiv:hep-ph/9808296 [hep-ph]]

    1998 arXiv

  86. [94]

    Drewes, Int

    M. Drewes, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E22(2013), 1330019 doi:10.1142/S0218301313300191 [arXiv:1303.6912 [hep-ph]]

    2013 arXiv

  87. [95]

    Drewes, PoSEPS-HEP2015(2015), 075 doi:10.22323/1.234.0075 [arXiv:1510.07883 [hep-ph]]

    M. Drewes, PoSEPS-HEP2015(2015), 075 doi:10.22323/1.234.0075 [arXiv:1510.07883 [hep-ph]]

    2015 arXiv

  88. [96]

    Drewes, B

    M. Drewes, B. Garbrecht, D. Gueter and J. Klaric, JHEP08(2017), 018 doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2017)018 [arXiv:1609.09069 [hep-ph]]

    2017 arXiv

  89. [97]

    A. D. Dolgov and S. H. Hansen, Astropart. Phys.16(2002), 339-344 doi:10.1016/S0927-6505(01)00115-3 [arXiv:hep-ph/0009083 [hep- ph]]

    2002 arXiv

  90. [98]

    Abazajian, G

    K. Abazajian, G. M. Fuller and M. Patel, Phys. Rev. D64(2001), 023501 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.64.023501 [arXiv:astro-ph/0101524 [astro- ph]]

    2001 arXiv

  91. [99]

    Kusenko, Phys

    A. Kusenko, Phys. Rept.481(2009), 1-28 doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2009.07.004 [arXiv:0906.2968 [hep-ph]]

    2009 arXiv

  92. [100]

    Asaka, S

    T. Asaka, S. Blanchet and M. Shaposhnikov, Phys. Lett. B631(2005), 151-156 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2005.09.070 [arXiv:hep-ph/0503065 [hep-ph]]

    2005 arXiv

  93. [101]

    Asaka and M

    T. Asaka and M. Shaposhnikov, Phys. Lett. B620(2005), 17-26 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2005.06.020 [arXiv:hep-ph/0505013 [hep-ph]]

    2005 arXiv

  94. [102]

    Boyarsky, O

    A. Boyarsky, O. Ruchayskiy and M. Shaposhnikov, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.59(2009), 191-214 doi:10.1146/annurev.nucl.010909.083654 [arXiv:0901.0011 [hep-ph]]

    2009

  95. [103]

    J. Kopp, M. Maltoni and T. Schwetz, Phys. Rev. Lett.107(2011), 091801 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.091801 [arXiv:1103.4570 [hep- ph]]

    2011 arXiv

  96. [104]

    Gariazzo, C

    S. Gariazzo, C. Giunti, M. Laveder, Y . F . Li and E. M. Zavanin, J. Phys. G43(2016), 033001 doi:10.1088/0954-3899/43/3/033001 [arXiv:1507.08204 [hep-ph]]

    2016 arXiv

  97. [105]

    Dentler, ´A

    M. Dentler, ´A. Hern ´andez-Cabezudo, J. Kopp, P . A. N. Machado, M. Maltoni, I. Martinez-Soler and T. Schwetz, JHEP08(2018), 010 doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2018)010 [arXiv:1803.10661 [hep-ph]]

    2018 arXiv

  98. [106]

    J. A. Casas and A. Ibarra, Nucl. Phys. B618(2001), 171-204 doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(01)00475-8 [arXiv:hep-ph/0103065 [hep-ph]]

    2001 arXiv

  99. [107]

    Shaposhnikov, JHEP08(2008), 008 doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/08/008 [arXiv:0804.4542 [hep-ph]]

    M. Shaposhnikov, JHEP08(2008), 008 doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/08/008 [arXiv:0804.4542 [hep-ph]]

    2008 arXiv

  100. [108]

    M. B. Gavela, T. Hambye, D. Hernandez and P . Hernandez, JHEP09(2009), 038 doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2009/09/038 [arXiv:0906.1461 [hep-ph]]

    2009 arXiv

  101. [109]

    Ruchayskiy and A

    O. Ruchayskiy and A. Ivashko, JHEP06(2012), 100 doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2012)100 [arXiv:1112.3319 [hep-ph]]

    2012 arXiv

  102. [110]

    Asaka, S

    T. Asaka, S. Eijima and H. Ishida, JHEP04(2011), 011 doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2011)011 [arXiv:1101.1382 [hep-ph]]

    2011 arXiv

  103. [111]

    Hern ´andez, M

    P . Hern ´andez, M. Kekic, J. L ´opez-Pav´on, J. Racker and J. Salvado, JHEP08(2016), 157 doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2016)157 [arXiv:1606.06719 [hep-ph]]

    2016 arXiv

  104. [112]

    Caputo, P

    A. Caputo, P . Hernandez, M. Kekic, J. L ´opez-Pav´on and J. Salvado, Eur. Phys. J. C77(2017) no.4, 258 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-017- 4823-8 [arXiv:1611.05000 [hep-ph]]

    2017 arXiv

  105. [113]

    Drewes, J

    M. Drewes, J. Hajer, J. Klaric and G. Lanfranchi, JHEP07(2018), 105 doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2018)105 [arXiv:1801.04207 [hep-ph]]

    2018 arXiv

  106. [114]

    A. Das, P . S. Bhupal Dev and N. Okada, Phys. Lett. B735(2014), 364-370 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2014.06.058 [arXiv:1405.0177 [hep-ph]]

    2014 arXiv

  107. [115]

    Das and N

    A. Das and N. Okada, Phys. Rev. D93(2016) no.3, 033003 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.93.033003 [arXiv:1510.04790 [hep-ph]]

    2016 arXiv

  108. [116]

    A. Das, P . Konar and S. Majhi, JHEP06(2016), 019 doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2016)019 [arXiv:1604.00608 [hep-ph]]

    2016 arXiv

  109. [117]

    Das, Adv

    A. Das, Adv. High Energy Phys.2018(2018), 9785318 doi:10.1155/2018/9785318 [arXiv:1803.10940 [hep-ph]]

    2018 arXiv

  110. [118]

    Buchmuller, P

    W. Buchmuller, P . Di Bari and M. Plumacher, Nucl. Phys. B643(2002), 367-390 [erratum: Nucl. Phys. B793(2008), 362] doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(02)00737-X [arXiv:hep-ph/0205349 [hep-ph]]

    2002 arXiv

  111. [119]

    Buchmuller, P

    W. Buchmuller, P . Di Bari and M. Plumacher, Nucl. Phys. B665(2003), 445-468 doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(03)00449-8 [arXiv:hep- ph/0302092 [hep-ph]]

    2003

  112. [120]

    Buchmuller, P

    W. Buchmuller, P . Di Bari and M. Plumacher, Annals Phys.315(2005), 305-351 doi:10.1016/j.aop.2004.02.003 [arXiv:hep-ph/0401240 [hep-ph]]

    2005 arXiv

  113. [121]

    Blanchet and P

    S. Blanchet and P . Di Bari, JCAP03(2007), 018 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2007/03/018 [arXiv:hep-ph/0607330 [hep-ph]]

    2007 arXiv

  114. [122]

    Davidson, E

    S. Davidson, E. Nardi and Y . Nir, Phys. Rept.466(2008), 105-177 doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2008.06.002 [arXiv:0802.2962 [hep-ph]]

    2008 arXiv

  115. [123]

    Abada, S

    A. Abada, S. Davidson, F . X. Josse-Michaux, M. Losada and A. Riotto, JCAP04(2006), 004 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2006/04/004 [arXiv:hep-ph/0601083 [hep-ph]]

    2006 arXiv

  116. [124]

    Nardi, Y

    E. Nardi, Y . Nir, E. Roulet and J. Racker, JHEP01(2006), 164 doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2006/01/164 [arXiv:hep-ph/0601084 [hep-ph]]

    2006 arXiv

  117. [125]

    Abada, S

    A. Abada, S. Davidson, A. Ibarra, F . X. Josse-Michaux, M. Losada and A. Riotto, JHEP09(2006), 010 doi:10.1088/1126- 6708/2006/09/010 [arXiv:hep-ph/0605281 [hep-ph]]

    2006 arXiv

  118. [126]

    Antusch, P

    S. Antusch, P . Di Bari, D. A. Jones and S. F . King, Nucl. Phys. B856(2012), 180-209 doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2011.10.036 [arXiv:1003.5132 [hep-ph]]

    2012 arXiv

  119. [127]

    Di Bari, Contemp

    P . Di Bari, Contemp. Phys.53(2012) no.4, 315-338 doi:10.1080/00107514.2012.701096 [arXiv:1206.3168 [hep-ph]]

    2012

  120. [128]

    Di Bari, Prog

    P . Di Bari, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.122(2022), 103913 doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2021.103913 [arXiv:2107.13750 [hep-ph]]

    2022

  121. [129]

    Drewes, Y

    M. Drewes, Y . Georis, C. Hagedorn and J. Klaric, [arXiv:2412.10254 [hep-ph]]

    arXiv

  122. [130]

    Ibarra, E

    A. Ibarra, E. Molinaro and S. T. Petcov, Phys. Rev. D84(2011), 013005 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.84.013005 [arXiv:1103.6217 [hep-ph]]. 28Right-handed neutrinos: seesaw models and signatures

    2011 arXiv

  123. [131]

    del Aguila and J

    F . del Aguila and J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra, Nucl. Phys. B813(2009), 22-90 doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2008.12.029 [arXiv:0808.2468 [hep- ph]]

    2009 arXiv

  124. [132]

    A. Atre, T. Han, S. Pascoli and B. Zhang, JHEP05(2009), 030 doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2009/05/030 [arXiv:0901.3589 [hep-ph]]

    2009 arXiv

  125. [133]

    P . S. B. Dev, A. Pilaftsis and U. k. Y ang, Phys. Rev. Lett.112(2014) no.8, 081801 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.081801 [arXiv:1308.2209 [hep-ph]]

    2014 arXiv

  126. [134]

    Pascoli, R

    S. Pascoli, R. Ruiz and C. Weiland, JHEP06(2019), 049 doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2019)049 [arXiv:1812.08750 [hep-ph]]

    2019 arXiv

  127. [135]

    Chakraborty, M

    S. Chakraborty, M. Mitra and S. Shil, Phys. Rev. D100(2019) no.1, 015012 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.015012 [arXiv:1810.08970 [hep- ph]]

    2019 arXiv

  128. [136]

    Curtin, M

    D. Curtin, M. Drewes, M. McCullough, P . Meade, R. N. Mohapatra, J. Shelton, B. Shuve, E. Accomando, C. Alpigiani and S. Antusch,et al.Rept. Prog. Phys.82(2019) no.11, 116201 doi:10.1088/1361-6633/ab28d6 [arXiv:1806.07396 [hep-ph]]

    2019 arXiv

  129. [137]

    A. M. Abdullahi, P . B. Alzas, B. Batell, J. Beacham, A. Boyarsky, S. Carbajal, A. Chatterjee, J. I. Crespo-Anadon, F . F . Deppisch and A. De Roeck,et al.J. Phys. G50(2023) no.2, 020501 doi:10.1088/1361-6471/ac98f9 [arXiv:2203.08039 [hep-ph]]

    2023 arXiv

  130. [138]

    Antusch, C

    S. Antusch, C. Biggio, E. Fernandez-Martinez, M. B. Gavela and J. Lopez-Pavon, JHEP10(2006), 084 doi:10.1088/1126- 6708/2006/10/084 [arXiv:hep-ph/0607020 [hep-ph]]

    2006 arXiv

  131. [139]

    Hernandez-Garcia and S

    J. Hernandez-Garcia and S. F . King, JHEP05(2019), 169 doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2019)169 [arXiv:1903.01474 [hep-ph]]

    2019 arXiv

  132. [140]

    Fu and S

    B. Fu and S. F . King, Phys. Rev. D105(2022) no.9, 095001 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.095001 [arXiv:2107.01486 [hep-ph]]

    2022 arXiv

  133. [141]

    Ahdidaet al.[SHiP], JHEP04(2019), 077 doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2019)077 [arXiv:1811.00930 [hep-ph]]

    C. Ahdidaet al.[SHiP], JHEP04(2019), 077 doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2019)077 [arXiv:1811.00930 [hep-ph]]

    2019 arXiv

  134. [142]

    Blondelet al.[FCC-ee study Team], Nucl

    A. Blondelet al.[FCC-ee study Team], Nucl. Part. Phys. Proc.273-275(2016), 1883-1890 doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2015.09.304 [arXiv:1411.5230 [hep-ex]]

    2016 arXiv

  135. [143]

    Drewes, Y

    M. Drewes, Y . Georis and J. Klari ´c, Phys. Rev. Lett.128(2022) no.5, 051801 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.051801 [arXiv:2106.16226 [hep-ph]]

    2022 arXiv

  136. [144]

    Tumasyanet al.[CMS], Phys

    A. Tumasyanet al.[CMS], Phys. Rev. Lett.131(2023) no.1, 011803 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.011803 [arXiv:2206.08956 [hep-ex]]

    2023 arXiv

  137. [145]

    Aadet al.[ATLAS], Phys

    G. Aadet al.[ATLAS], Phys. Lett. B856(2024), 138865 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138865 [arXiv:2403.15016 [hep-ex]]

    2024

  138. [146]

    Chianese, D

    M. Chianese, D. F . G. Fiorillo, G. Miele and S. Morisi, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A34(2019) no.08, 1950047 doi:10.1142/S0217751X19500477 [arXiv:1812.01994 [hep-ph]]

    2019 arXiv

  139. [147]

    Beacham, C

    J. Beacham, C. Burrage, D. Curtin, A. De Roeck, J. Evans, J. L. Feng, C. Gatto, S. Gninenko, A. Hartin and I. Irastorza,et al.J. Phys. G 47(2020) no.1, 010501 doi:10.1088/1361-6471/ab4cd2 [arXiv:1901.09966 [hep-ex]]

    2020 arXiv

  140. [148]

    Blennow, E

    M. Blennow, E. Fernandez-Martinez, J. Lopez-Pavon and J. Menendez, JHEP07(2010), 096 doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2010)096 [arXiv:1005.3240 [hep-ph]]

    2010 arXiv

  141. [149]

    Mitra, G

    M. Mitra, G. Senjanovic and F . Vissani, Nucl. Phys. B856(2012), 26-73 doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2011.10.035 [arXiv:1108.0004 [hep-ph]]

    2012 arXiv

  142. [150]

    Y . F . Li and S. s. Liu, Phys. Lett. B706(2012), 406-411 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2011.11.054 [arXiv:1110.5795 [hep-ph]]

    2012 arXiv

  143. [151]

    Dekens, J

    W. Dekens, J. de Vries, D. Castillo, J. Men ´endez, E. Mereghetti, V. Plakkot, P . Soriano and G. Zhou, JHEP09(2024), 201 doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2024)201 [arXiv:2402.07993 [hep-ph]]

    2024 arXiv

  144. [152]

    de Vries, M

    J. de Vries, M. Drewes, Y . Georis, J. Klari ´c and V. Plakkot, JHEP05(2025), 090 doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2025)090 [arXiv:2407.10560 [hep-ph]]

    2025 arXiv

  145. [153]

    S. F . King, Nucl. Phys. B576(2000), 85-105 doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(00)00109-7 [arXiv:hep-ph/9912492 [hep-ph]]

    2000 arXiv

  146. [154]

    S. F . King, JHEP09(2002), 011 doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2002/09/011 [arXiv:hep-ph/0204360 [hep-ph]]

    2002 arXiv

  147. [155]

    P . H. Frampton, S. L. Glashow and T. Y anagida, Phys. Lett. B548(2002), 119-121 doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(02)02853-8 [arXiv:hep- ph/0208157 [hep-ph]]

    2002

  148. [156]

    Ibarra and G

    A. Ibarra and G. G. Ross, Phys. Lett. B591(2004), 285-296 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2004.04.037 [arXiv:hep-ph/0312138 [hep-ph]]

    2004 arXiv

  149. [157]

    Canetti and M

    L. Canetti and M. Shaposhnikov, JCAP09(2010), 001 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2010/09/001 [arXiv:1006.0133 [hep-ph]]

    2010 arXiv

  150. [158]

    Asaka, S

    T. Asaka, S. Eijima and H. Ishida, JCAP02(2012), 021 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2012/02/021 [arXiv:1112.5565 [hep-ph]]

    2012 arXiv

  151. [159]

    Antusch, P

    S. Antusch, P . Di Bari, D. A. Jones and S. F . King, Phys. Rev. D86(2012), 023516 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.86.023516 [arXiv:1107.6002 [hep-ph]]

    2012 arXiv

  152. [160]

    Canetti, M

    L. Canetti, M. Drewes and M. Shaposhnikov, Phys. Rev. Lett.110(2013) no.6, 061801 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.061801 [arXiv:1204.3902 [hep-ph]]

    2013 arXiv

  153. [161]

    Canetti, M

    L. Canetti, M. Drewes, T. Frossard and M. Shaposhnikov, Phys. Rev. D87(2013), 093006 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.87.093006 [arXiv:1208.4607 [hep-ph]]

    2013 arXiv

  154. [162]

    Shuve and I

    B. Shuve and I. Y avin, Phys. Rev. D89(2014) no.7, 075014 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.89.075014 [arXiv:1401.2459 [hep-ph]]

    2014 arXiv

  155. [163]

    Abada, G

    A. Abada, G. Arcadi, V. Domcke and M. Lucente, JCAP11(2015), 041 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2015/11/041 [arXiv:1507.06215 [hep-ph]]

    2015 arXiv

  156. [164]

    Hern´andez, M

    P . Hern´andez, M. Kekic, J. L´opez-Pav´on, J. Racker and N. Rius, JHEP10(2015), 067 doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2015)067 [arXiv:1508.03676 [hep-ph]]

    2015 arXiv

  157. [165]

    Drewes and S

    M. Drewes and S. Eijima, Phys. Lett. B763(2016), 72-79 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2016.09.054 [arXiv:1606.06221 [hep-ph]]

    2016 arXiv

  158. [166]

    Asaka, S

    T. Asaka, S. Eijima and H. Ishida, Phys. Lett. B762(2016), 371-375 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2016.09.044 [arXiv:1606.06686 [hep-ph]]

    2016 arXiv

  159. [167]

    Drewes, B

    M. Drewes, B. Garbrecht, D. Gueter and J. Klaric, JHEP12(2016), 150 doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2016)150 [arXiv:1606.06690 [hep-ph]]

    2016 arXiv

  160. [168]

    Asaka, S

    T. Asaka, S. Eijima, H. Ishida, K. Minogawa and T. Y oshii, Phys. Rev. D96(2017) no.8, 083010 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.083010 [arXiv:1704.02692 [hep-ph]]

    2017 arXiv

  161. [169]

    Abada, G

    A. Abada, G. Arcadi, V. Domcke and M. Lucente, JCAP12(2017), 024 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2017/12/024 [arXiv:1709.00415 [hep-ph]]

    2017 arXiv

  162. [170]

    Antusch, E

    S. Antusch, E. Cazzato, M. Drewes, O. Fischer, B. Garbrecht, D. Gueter and J. Klaric, JHEP09(2018), 124 doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2018)124 [arXiv:1710.03744 [hep-ph]]

    2018 arXiv

  163. [171]

    S. F . King, Nucl. Phys. B786(2007), 52-83 doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2007.06.024 [arXiv:hep-ph/0610239 [hep-ph]]

    2007 arXiv

  164. [172]

    S. F . King, Nucl. Phys. B562(1999), 57-77 doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(99)00542-8 [arXiv:hep-ph/9904210 [hep-ph]]

    1999 arXiv

  165. [173]

    S. F . King and G. G. Ross, Phys. Lett. B520(2001), 243-253 doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(01)01139-X [arXiv:hep-ph/0108112 [hep-ph]]

    2001 arXiv

  166. [174]

    S. F . King and G. G. Ross, Phys. Lett. B574(2003), 239-252 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2003.09.027 [arXiv:hep-ph/0307190 [hep-ph]]

    2003 arXiv

  167. [175]

    S. F . King, Phys. Lett. B675(2009), 347-351 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2009.04.031 [arXiv:0903.3199 [hep-ph]]

    2009 arXiv

  168. [176]

    M. C. Chen and S. F . King, JHEP06(2009), 072 doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2009/06/072 [arXiv:0903.0125 [hep-ph]]

    2009 arXiv

  169. [177]

    Choubey, S

    S. Choubey, S. F . King and M. Mitra, Phys. Rev. D82(2010), 033002 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.82.033002 [arXiv:1004.3756 [hep-ph]]

    2010 arXiv

  170. [178]

    S. F . King, JHEP01(2011), 115 doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2011)115 [arXiv:1011.6167 [hep-ph]]

    2011 arXiv

  171. [179]

    S. F . King and C. Luhn, JHEP03(2012), 036 doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2012)036 [arXiv:1112.1959 [hep-ph]]

    2012 arXiv

  172. [180]

    S. F . King, Phys. Lett. B718(2012), 136-142 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.10.028 [arXiv:1205.0506 [hep-ph]]

    2012 arXiv

  173. [181]

    G. J. Ding, S. F . King and C. C. Li, Nucl. Phys. B925(2017), 470-499 doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2017.10.019 [arXiv:1705.05307 [hep-ph]]

    2017 arXiv

  174. [182]

    Costa and S

    F . Costa and S. F . King, Universe9(2023) no.11, 472 doi:10.3390/universe9110472 [arXiv:2307.13895 [hep-ph]]

    2023 arXiv

  175. [183]

    G. J. Ding, S. F . King and C. C. Li, JHEP12(2018), 003 doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2018)003 [arXiv:1807.07538 [hep-ph]]. Right-handed neutrinos: seesaw models and signatures29

    2018 arXiv

  176. [184]

    G. J. Ding, S. F . King and C. C. Li, Phys. Rev. D99(2019) no.7, 075035 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.99.075035 [arXiv:1811.12340 [hep-ph]]

    2019 arXiv

  177. [185]

    S. F . King, JHEP08(2005), 105 doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2005/08/105 [arXiv:hep-ph/0506297 [hep-ph]]

    2005 arXiv

  178. [186]

    Antusch, S

    S. Antusch, S. F . King, C. Luhn and M. Spinrath, Nucl. Phys. B856(2012), 328-341 doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2011.11.009 [arXiv:1108.4278 [hep-ph]]

    2012 arXiv

  179. [187]

    S. F . King, JHEP07(2013), 137 doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2013)137 [arXiv:1304.6264 [hep-ph]]

    2013 arXiv

  180. [188]

    S. F . King, JHEP02(2016), 085 doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2016)085 [arXiv:1512.07531 [hep-ph]]

    2016 arXiv

  181. [189]

    S. F . King and C. Luhn, JHEP09(2016), 023 doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2016)023 [arXiv:1607.05276 [hep-ph]]

    2016 arXiv

  182. [190]

    Ballett, S

    P . Ballett, S. F . King, S. Pascoli, N. W. Prouse and T. Wang, JHEP03(2017), 110 doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2017)110 [arXiv:1612.01999 [hep-ph]]

    2017 arXiv

  183. [191]

    S. F . King, S. Molina Sedgwick and S. J. Rowley, JHEP10(2018), 184 doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2018)184 [arXiv:1808.01005 [hep-ph]]

    2018 arXiv

  184. [192]

    S. F . King, Phys. Lett. B724(2013), 92-98 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2013.06.013 [arXiv:1305.4846 [hep-ph]]

    2013 arXiv

  185. [193]

    S. F . King, JHEP01(2014), 119 doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2014)119 [arXiv:1311.3295 [hep-ph]]

    2014 arXiv

  186. [194]

    Bj¨orkeroth and S

    F . Bj¨orkeroth and S. F . King, J. Phys. G42(2015) no.12, 125002 doi:10.1088/0954-3899/42/12/125002 [arXiv:1412.6996 [hep-ph]]

    2015 arXiv

  187. [195]

    P . T. Chen, G. J. Ding, S. F . King and C. C. Li, J. Phys. G47(2020) no.6, 065001 doi:10.1088/1361-6471/ab7e8d [arXiv:1906.11414 [hep-ph]]

    2020 arXiv

  188. [196]

    G. J. Ding, S. F . King, X. G. Liu and J. N. Lu, JHEP12(2019), 030 doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2019)030 [arXiv:1910.03460 [hep-ph]]

    2019

  189. [197]

    G. J. Ding, S. F . King and C. Y . Y ao, Phys. Rev. D104(2021) no.5, 055034 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.055034 [arXiv:2103.16311 [hep- ph]]

    2021 arXiv

  190. [198]

    de Medeiros Varzielas, S

    I. de Medeiros Varzielas, S. F . King and M. Levy, JHEP02(2023), 143 doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2023)143 [arXiv:2211.00654 [hep-ph]]

    2023 arXiv

  191. [199]

    de Medeiros Varzielas, S

    I. de Medeiros Varzielas, S. F . King and M. Levy, JHEP05(2024), 203 doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2024)203 [arXiv:2309.15901 [hep-ph]]

    2024 arXiv

  192. [200]

    F . J. de Anda and S. F . King, JHEP06(2023), 122 doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2023)122 [arXiv:2304.05958 [hep-ph]]

    2023 arXiv

  193. [201]

    Hirsch and S

    M. Hirsch and S. F . King, Phys. Rev. D64(2001), 113005 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.64.113005 [arXiv:hep-ph/0107014 [hep-ph]]

    2001 arXiv

  194. [202]

    S. F . King, Phys. Rev. D67(2003), 113010 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.67.113010 [arXiv:hep-ph/0211228 [hep-ph]]

    2003 arXiv

  195. [203]

    Antusch, S

    S. Antusch, S. F . King and A. Riotto, JCAP11(2006), 011 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2006/11/011 [arXiv:hep-ph/0609038 [hep-ph]]

    2006 arXiv

  196. [204]

    Bj ¨orkeroth, F

    F . Bj ¨orkeroth, F . J. de Anda, I. de Medeiros Varzielas and S. F . King, JHEP10(2015), 104 doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2015)104 [arXiv:1505.05504 [hep-ph]]

    2015 arXiv

  197. [205]

    J. A. Dror, T. Hiramatsu, K. Kohri, H. Murayama and G. White, Phys. Rev. Lett.124(2020) no.4, 041804 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.041804 [arXiv:1908.03227 [hep-ph]]

    2020 arXiv

  198. [206]

    B. Fu, A. Ghoshal and S. F . King, JHEP11(2023), 071 doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2023)071 [arXiv:2306.07334 [hep-ph]]

    2023 arXiv

  199. [207]

    Buchmuller, V

    W. Buchmuller, V. Domcke, H. Murayama and K. Schmitz, Phys. Lett. B809(2020), 135764 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135764 [arXiv:1912.03695 [hep-ph]]

    2020

  200. [208]

    S. F . King, S. Pascoli, J. Turner and Y . L. Zhou, Phys. Rev. Lett.126(2021) no.2, 021802 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.021802 [arXiv:2005.13549 [hep-ph]]

    2021 arXiv

  201. [209]

    S. F . King, S. Pascoli, J. Turner and Y . L. Zhou, JHEP10(2021), 225 doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2021)225 [arXiv:2106.15634 [hep-ph]]

    2021 arXiv

  202. [210]

    B. Fu, S. F . King, L. Marsili, S. Pascoli, J. Turner and Y . L. Zhou, JHEP11(2022), 072 doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2022)072 [arXiv:2209.00021 [hep-ph]]

    2022 arXiv

  203. [211]

    D. I. Dunsky, A. Ghoshal, H. Murayama, Y . Sakakihara and G. White, Phys. Rev. D106(2022) no.7, 075030 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.075030 [arXiv:2111.08750 [hep-ph]]

    2022 arXiv

  204. [212]

    B. Fu, A. Ghoshal, S. F . King and M. H. Rahat, JHEP08(2024), 237 doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2024)237 [arXiv:2404.16931 [hep-ph]]

    2024 arXiv

  205. [213]

    G. C. Branco, P . M. Ferreira, L. Lavoura, M. N. Rebelo, M. Sher and J. P . Silva, Phys. Rept.516(2012), 1-102 doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2012.02.002 [arXiv:1106.0034 [hep-ph]]

    2012 arXiv

  206. [214]

    Chianese, B

    M. Chianese, B. Fu and S. F . King, JHEP05(2021), 129 doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2021)129 [arXiv:2102.07780 [hep-ph]]

    2021 arXiv

  207. [215]

    Chikashige, R

    Y . Chikashige, R. N. Mohapatra and R. D. Peccei, Phys. Rev. Lett.45(1980), 1926 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.45.1926

    1980 doi

  208. [216]

    Chikashige, R

    Y . Chikashige, R. N. Mohapatra and R. D. Peccei, Phys. Lett. B98(1981), 265-268 doi:10.1016/0370-2693(81)90011-3

    1981 doi

  209. [217]

    G. B. Gelmini and M. Roncadelli, Phys. Lett. B99(1981), 411-415 doi:10.1016/0370-2693(81)90559-1

    1981 doi

  210. [218]

    S. F . King, S. K. Manna, R. Roshan and A. Sil, Phys. Rev. D111(2025) no.9, 095008 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.095008 [arXiv:2412.14121 [hep-ph]]

    2025 arXiv

  211. [219]

    R. N. Mohapatra, Phys. Rev. Lett.56(1986), 561-563 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.56.561

    1986 doi

  212. [220]

    Wyler and L

    D. Wyler and L. Wolfenstein, Nucl. Phys. B218(1983), 205-214 doi:10.1016/0550-3213(83)90482-0

    1983 doi

  213. [221]

    R. N. Mohapatra and J. W. F . Valle, Phys. Rev. D34(1986), 1642 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.34.1642

    1986 doi

  214. [222]

    Bernabeu, A

    J. Bernabeu, A. Santamaria, J. Vidal, A. Mendez and J. W. F . Valle, Phys. Lett. B187(1987), 303-308 doi:10.1016/0370-2693(87)91100-2

    1987 doi

  215. [223]

    M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia and J. W. F . Valle, Phys. Lett. B216(1989), 360-366 doi:10.1016/0370-2693(89)91131-3

    1989 doi

  216. [224]

    E. K. Akhmedov, M. Lindner, E. Schnapka and J. W. F . Valle, Phys. Rev. D53(1996), 2752-2780 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.53.2752 [arXiv:hep-ph/9509255 [hep-ph]]

    1996 arXiv

  217. [225]

    E. K. Akhmedov, M. Lindner, E. Schnapka and J. W. F . Valle, Phys. Lett. B368(1996), 270-280 doi:10.1016/0370-2693(95)01504-3 [arXiv:hep-ph/9507275 [hep-ph]]

    1996 arXiv

  218. [226]

    Malinsky, J

    M. Malinsky, J. C. Romao and J. W. F . Valle, Phys. Rev. Lett.95(2005), 161801 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.161801 [arXiv:hep- ph/0506296 [hep-ph]]

    2005

  219. [227]

    Malinsky, T

    M. Malinsky, T. Ohlsson, Z. z. Xing and H. Zhang, Phys. Lett. B679(2009), 242-248 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2009.07.038 [arXiv:0905.2889 [hep-ph]]

    2009 arXiv

  220. [228]

    Abada and M

    A. Abada and M. Lucente, Nucl. Phys. B885(2014), 651-678 doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2014.06.003 [arXiv:1401.1507 [hep-ph]]

    2014 arXiv

  221. [229]

    A. E. C ´arcamo Hern ´andez and S. F . King, Nucl. Phys. B953(2020), 114950 doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2020.114950 [arXiv:1903.02565 [hep-ph]]

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.