Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Gravitational Wave Signatures Induced by Dark Fluid Accretion in Binary Systems

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read An accreting dark fluid around a supermassive black hole imprints its equation of state on the gravitational-wave phase of an inspiraling stellar-mass companion.

desk verdict A coherent framework for accreting-fluid effects on EMRI dephasing, honestly labeled preliminary, but the detectability claim rests on systematics control the paper does not provide. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.07929 v1 pith:J2PU4HFQ submitted 2025-02-11 gr-qc astro-ph.CO

Evangelos Achilleas Paraskevas , Leandros Perivolaropoulos This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qcastro-ph.CO MSC 83C3583C5783F05 PACS 04.30.-w04.70.Bw95.35.+d98.80.-k
keywords gravitationalwavesdarkfluidaccretionextrememassratioinspiralspost-Newtonianapproximationsphericalequationofstatede-phasingsuddencosmologicalsingularities
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that a dark fluid steadily accreting onto a supermassive black hole can be read off from the gravitational-wave phase of an extreme-mass-ratio inspiral, provided the ambient density is high enough. The central prediction is that the accumulated de-phasing between the fluid-dressed and the vacuum binary is controlled by the fluid's equation-of-state parameter $w$, with the sign of the de-phasing flipping near $w\simeq 0$ at an initial separation of $70\,r_{\rm ISCO}$. At cosmologically critical densities the ten-year de-phasing is tiny, about $10^{-6}$ rad, but it grows with density and reaches $\simeq -0.01$ rad in four years for $\rho_\infty=10^6\rho_{\rm crit}$, a range where future space-based detectors could see it. The paper also studies sudden cosmological singularities, finding that their effect on the waveform is negligible at cosmologically relevant densities even though they can make an initially circular orbit slightly eccentric.

What carries the argument

The machinery is a post-Newtonian Lagrangian two-body model in which the 1PN and 2.5PN corrections are inserted as generalized forces (Eqs. (13)-(14)), supplemented by two fluid effects. The accretion profile comes from the steady-state, spherically symmetric Michel solution for a perfect fluid with linear equation of state $p=\alpha(\rho-\rho_0)c^2$, giving radial velocity and density profiles $u^r(r)$ and $\rho(r)$ from Eqs. (55)-(56). The load-bearing object is the global radial force $f_r^{\rm fluid}=-4\pi G r^{-2}\int_{r_S}^{r}\left(\rho(r')+3p(r')/c^2\right) r'^2\,dr'$ (Eq. (60)), the spherical-shell gravitational pull of the fluid on the perturber, which dominates over dynamical friction at large separations and whose zero controls the sign flip of the de-phasing. Waveforms are then computed from the quadrupole formula using the fluid-corrected trajectories, and phase shifts are read off as $\Delta\phi=\phi_{\rm fluid}-\phi$.

What would settle it

Run a fully relativistic hydrodynamical simulation of a test fluid accreting onto a Schwarzschild black hole with a companion moving through it, including the fluid's self-gravity, and compare the resulting radial force on the companion with Eq. (60) at radii of $10$-$250\,r_{\rm ISCO}$; if the sign or magnitude of the force changes, the claimed $w$-dependence of the de-phasing would not survive.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that for an extreme-mass-ratio inspiral composed of a $10^6\,M_\odot$ Schwarzschild black hole and a $10\,M_\odot$ perturber, the dominant environmental effect of a spherically accreting dark fluid is not the local dynamical friction but the global gravitational pull of the fluid shell between the horizon and the perturber. The de-phasing $\Delta\phi\equiv\phi_{\rm fluid}-\phi$ at ten years is negative for $w\lesssim 0$ and positive for $w\gtrsim 0$ at $r_{\rm init}=70\,r_{\rm ISCO}$ when $\rho_\infty=\rho_{\rm crit}$, passing through zero where the integrated force in Eq. (60) vanishes, and the precise crossing value shifts with distance. Quantitatively, for $\rho_\infty=\rho_{\rm crit}$ the ten-year shift is of order $10^{-6}$ rad, while at $\rho_\infty=10^6\rho_{\rm crit}$ and $r_{\rm init}=10\,r_{\rm ISCO}$ the four-year de-phasing is $\sim -0.01$ rad for $w\simeq -1$. The paper further claims that sudden cosmological singularities produce only a negligible waveform de-phasing at cosmologically relevant densities, although they kick the perturber's radial velocity by an amount that grows with distance.

Load-bearing premise

The calculation assumes that the fluid's own gravity is too weak to affect its own density profile, yet the fluid's gravity is strong enough to pull the orbiting black hole; if that combination is internally inconsistent, the predicted phase shifts would change.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At large separations of tens to hundreds of $r_{\rm ISCO}$, de-phasing from spherical accretion is dominated by the fluid's global gravity rather than dynamical friction, so measurements of phase can constrain the enclosed fluid mass instead of only local dissipation.
  • The sign of $\Delta\phi$ at a given distance is a function of $w$: stiff fluids with $w\gtrsim 0$ produce a positive shift while dark-energy-like fluids with $w\lesssim 0$ produce a negative shift, with the transition point depending on orbital radius.
  • For cosmologically relevant densities the predicted shift is too small to observe, but for densities of $10^6\rho_{\rm crit}$ the four-year shift reaches $\sim -0.01$ rad at $r_{\rm init}=10\,r_{\rm ISCO}$, potentially within reach of next-generation space-based gravitational-wave detectors.
  • Sudden cosmological singularities can deform an initially circular orbit into a mildly eccentric one through a velocity kick that grows with distance, but the resulting gravitational-wave de-phasing is negligible at $\rho_\infty=\rho_{\rm crit}$.
  • The Lagrangian generalized-force framework applies to any dissipative or conservative environmental effect expressible as a force, so the same method can be reused for other dark-fluid equations of state and for more general fluid geometries.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper leaves implicit that the sign flip near $w\simeq 0$ could serve as a model-independent diagnostic: if an observed EMRI de-phasing tracks the enclosed-mass integral rather than the local density, that favors a pressure-supporting dark fluid over a collisionless spike, whose global and local effects scale differently.
  • At densities far above $\rho_{\rm crit}$, non-spherically symmetric accretion may make dynamical friction dominate again, as the paper itself notes, so the sign-flip diagnostic would need calibration on inflow geometry before being used as a precise equation-of-state probe.
  • A natural test of the framework would be a fully relativistic hydrodynamical simulation of Bondi-Michel accretion onto a Schwarzschild black hole with a perturbing companion, checking whether the integrated shell force matches Eq. (60) to the claimed precision at radii of $10$-$250\,r_{\rm ISCO}$.
  • The sudden-singularity velocity kick in Eq. (76) could be confronted with cosmological simulations of type-II singularities; if future observations ever tie an EMRI eccentricity to a singularity time, that would give an independent constraint on the jump parameter $\eta$ and the background equation-of-state parameter $w_\infty$.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies an extreme-mass-ratio inspiral (a 10^6 M_sun Schwarzschild black hole with a 10 M_sun companion) embedded in a spherically symmetric, steadily accreting dark fluid with a linear equation of state p = alpha (rho - rho0) c^2. The authors combine 1PN and 2.5PN equations of motion with local dynamical friction from the fluid and a global gravitational force from the fluid enclosed inside the perturber's orbit. They compute gravitational-wave dephasing relative to a no-fluid binary, report a dependence of the dephasing on the equation-of-state parameter w (of order 10^-6 rad over 10 years at rho_inf = rho_crit and r_init = 70 r_ISCO), and extend the formalism to sudden cosmological singularities, finding those give negligible dephasing at cosmological densities. The paper validates its numerical setup against the dark-matter-spike results of Montalvo et al. (2024).

Significance. If the reported dephasing numbers were correct, the paper would provide a useful framework for studying environmental effects on EMRI waveforms and a concrete, falsifiable prediction connecting a dark fluid's equation of state to gravitational-wave phase evolution. The manuscript has clear strengths: the equations of motion are explicit, the accretion profiles are derived from the standard Babichev et al. formalism, and the validation against an earlier dark-matter-spike calculation is a good check of the numerical pipeline. However, the central quantitative claim at cosmologically relevant densities is called into question by a simple order-of-magnitude estimate given in the major comments below, and the paper does not provide the systematic-error analysis needed to support the inference statement in Section 5.1.

major comments (3)
  1. [5.1, Eq. (60), Fig. 5 upper panel] The magnitude of the reported dephasing is inconsistent with the input physics by many orders of magnitude. For rho_inf = rho_crit, m1 = 10^6 M_sun, and r = 70 r_ISCO = 6.2e11 m, the enclosed active mass is |M_enc| ~ (4 pi / 3) |rho + 3p/c^2| r^3 ~ 1.7e10 kg (for w = -1), so the fluid acceleration on the perturber is G |M_enc| / r^2 ~ 3e-24 m/s^2 and the fractional change of the central acceleration is |M_enc|/m1 ~ 8e-27. With about 1.2e3 orbits in 10 years, the accumulated dephasing is Delta-phi ~ pi N |M_enc|/m1 ~ 1e-23 rad, not the plotted 10^-6 rad. This 17-order-of-magnitude discrepancy suggests a unit conversion or rescaling error in the numerical implementation of Eq. (60) (for example, using the SI density without the G/c^2 conversion to active gravitational mass). The authors should verify their code against the enclosed-mass benchmark and report the physical acceleration and dephasing for a test case.
  2. [2, 5.1, and Conclusions] The inference claim in Section 5.1 ('the equation of state of the accreting energy density can be inferred from its impact on the binary system's dynamics') is not supported by a systematic-error budget. The model omits 2PN and all spin-orbit and spin-spin terms; at r_init = 70 r_ISCO, (v/c)^2 ~ 2.4e-3, so the omitted 2PN phase over 10 years is of order (v/c)^4 * 2 pi N ~ 0.08 rad, roughly five orders of magnitude above the claimed fluid dephasing. Computing Delta-phi as a fluid-minus-no-fluid difference cancels the leading omitted PN terms in that idealized comparison, but a real measurement requires a vacuum waveform model accurate below the fluid signal, and the paper provides no Fisher-matrix, mismatch, or systematic-error estimate. The Conclusions acknowledge that such effects may be overshadowed, but the stronger statement in Section 5.1 should either be removed or backed by a concrete template-accuracy calculation.
  3. [4 and 5, Eq. (60)] The treatment of the fluid's self-gravity is asymmetric and its domain of validity is not quantified. The accretion profiles are derived under the explicit assumption that 'the fluid's energy density is sufficiently low, such that its self-gravity can be neglected' (Section 4), yet the same fluid is used to produce a global gravitational force on the perturber of the form G M_enc(r)/r^2 in Eq. (60). This is consistent only to leading order in M_enc(r)/m1, and the manuscript does not state this small parameter or give its value for the plotted examples. The extrapolation to 'higher energy densities' where the effect becomes significant is precisely the regime where M_enc(r)/m1 may no longer be small (for example, at 10^25 rho_crit and 70 r_ISCO, M_enc/m1 ~ 4e-2). The paper should specify the validity condition and report M_enc/m1 for the cases shown.
minor comments (4)
  1. [5] The sentence 'As long as m1 << m2, such that the center of mass nearly coincides with the center of the supermassive black hole' has the mass ratio reversed; it should read m2 << m1.
  2. [5, Eq. (62)] The quadrupole moment in Eq. (62) includes the static, spherically symmetric T00_fluid term. Such a term contributes a constant to Mij and therefore has zero second time derivative, so it does not affect the waveform polarizations in Eqs. (18)-(19); the text should clarify why it is included or remove it.
  3. [2, Eq. (11)] The notation in Eq. (11) appears garbled ('tyre', 'ctyre2'); the definitions of ar r and ar t should be typeset as ar r = r/(c t_yr e) and ar t = t/t_yr, or similar, and the text should define all symbols.
  4. [Figure 7 caption] The caption refers to 'Left Panel' and 'Right Panel', while the text refers to 'upper panel' and 'lower panel'; the panel labeling should be made consistent.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity in the central fluid-EoS dephasing derivation; only a minor non-load-bearing self-citation in the sudden-singularity section.

  1. other [Section 5.3, Equation (67)]
    "The scale factor of a past sudden singularity event, ensuring that a(τ0)=1, is parametrized as follows [93]:"

    Equation (67) is attributed to reference [93], which is the authors' own prior paper. The parametrization is not derived in the present work, and the cited prior paper introduced it as a model ansatz rather than as an externally established theorem. This is a self-citation for an adopted functional form. It is not load-bearing for the central claim: the sudden-singularity section is an extension, and its conclusion (negligible dephasing for cosmological densities) is computed from the displayed formula rather than assumed from the citation.

full rationale

The central dephasing result is not circular. The fluid density and velocity profiles are obtained from the steady-state accretion equations of Babichev et al. [49,53], which are external references, not fitted to the GW phase. The dephasing Δφ = φ_fluid − φ is computed by numerically integrating the 1PN+2.5PN equations of motion with and without the fluid force (Eqs. 58-60) and comparing the resulting orbital phases. No parameter of the fluid model is adjusted to reproduce Δφ, and the comparison with Montalvo et al. [43] is an external validation. The only self-citation that enters is the sudden-singularity scale-factor parametrization of Eq. (67), taken from the authors' own prior paper [93]; it is an explicit ansatz for a secondary analysis and does not support the main fluid-EoS dephasing claim. The skeptic's concern about omitted 2PN and spin contributions is a validity/robustness issue, not circularity, since both the fluid and no-fluid trajectories omit the same terms and the claim about w-dependence is not obtained by fitting those omitted terms. Overall, the paper's derivation chain is self-contained for its main claim.

Assumptions & free parameters 8 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central dephasing claim rests on a chain of previously published accretion and post-Newtonian results, plus several hand-chosen parameters such as alpha, rho_0/rho_infty, r_init, and eta. No new fundamental entities are introduced. The main added assumption is that a test fluid can back-react on the perturber through a Newtonian shell force while its own self-gravity is neglected in constructing the accretion profiles.

free parameters (8)
  • alpha (equation-of-state slope) = 0.24, 0.9, 1
    Chosen per fluid model; controls the radial velocity profile and density profile through Eqs. (55)-(57), and therefore the dephasing.
  • rho_0 / rho_infty (equation-of-state offset) = 0, 0.5, 2, 7/3
    Chosen to realize w values from dust-like to phantom; enters p = alpha (rho - rho_0) c^2 and the density profile in Eq. (56).
  • eta (sudden-singularity jump parameter) = -10, -1, 1, 5, 10, 100
    Introduced in the scale factor Eq. (67); controls the amplitude of the radial velocity kick in Eq. (76).
  • beta or w_infty for the singularity = beta = 666.667, w_infty = -0.999
    Sets the pre-singularity cosmological background and the kick scale in Eq. (76).
  • tau_s (singularity occurrence time) = 13.7 Gyr + 5 yr
    Chosen in the binary example to fix the velocity-kick magnitude through the 1/tau_s factor.
  • initial separation r_init = 70 r_ISCO, with additional examples at 10 and 250 r_ISCO
    Boundary condition that sets the orbital radius where dephasing and w are evaluated; the dephasing sign and size depend on it.
  • Coulomb logarithm ln Lambda = 3
    Taken from prior dark-matter spike literature for the validation case; enters the dynamical-friction force in Eqs. (23)-(24) and in Figure 3.
  • Dark-matter spike fit parameters A, w, q = A = 6.42e-43 x 1477.063 x 1.989e30 kg/m^3, w = 1.82, q = 1.91
    Taken from Speeney et al. for the validation spike profile in Eq. (22); not part of the new fluid dephasing result.
assumptions (8)
  • domain assumption The binary equations of motion are obtained by adding 1PN and 2.5PN generalized forces to the Newtonian Lagrangian, following Montalvo et al.
    Used in Section 2, Eqs. (9)-(14); assumes this Lagrangian-plus-force method is equivalent to standard post-Newtonian equations at these orders.
  • domain assumption The accreting fluid is a perfect, non-self-gravitating test fluid in steady-state spherical flow on a Schwarzschild background.
    Adopted from Babichev et al. in Section 4; gives the density and velocity profiles in Eqs. (55)-(56).
  • domain assumption The linear equation of state p = alpha (rho - rho_0) c^2 approximates the dark fluid, with 0 < alpha <= 1 for stability.
    Introduced in Eq. (38); the resulting w(r) spans quintessence and phantom cases.
  • ad hoc to paper The fluid's own gravity can be neglected in the accretion solution but included as a Newtonian spherical-shell force on the perturber.
    Section 4 states self-gravity is neglected, yet Eq. (60) sources f_fluid from the same fluid; the consistency of this switch is not discussed.
  • ad hoc to paper At distances of tens to hundreds of r_ISCO, omission of 2PN, spin-orbit and spin-spin terms does not affect the small fluid-induced dephasing.
    Stated in Sections 2 and 5; no explicit cancellation estimate is given between omitted 2PN dephasing and the 1e-6 rad fluid dephasing.
  • domain assumption The sudden singularity is described by the parametrized scale factor Eq. (67) with a Heaviside jump, taken from the authors' earlier work.
    Used in Section 5.3; the delta-function pressure leads to the velocity kick in Eq. (76).
  • domain assumption Gravitational waveforms are computed with the quadrupole formula using the retarded time, with the observer placed at 1 Mpc.
    Section 2, Eqs. (17)-(19); standard weak-field waveform calculation.
  • domain assumption The orbit remains quasi-circular throughout the inspiral until the plunge.
    Section 3 and footnote 2; justifies the near-circular initial conditions and the use of circular-orbit dynamical-friction fits.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Gravitational Wave Signatures Induced by Dark Fluid Accretion in Binary Systems." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/J2PU4HFQ

@misc{pith2026250207929,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Gravitational Wave Signatures Induced by Dark Fluid Accretion in Binary Systems},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/J2PU4HFQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.07929}
}
read the original abstract

We investigate the impact of dark fluid accretion on gravitational waveforms emitted by a compact binary system consisting of a supermassive black hole and a stellar-mass black hole. Using a Lagrangian framework with 1~PN and 2.5~PN corrections, we analyze the effects of the spherically symmetric accretion of a fluid with steady-state flow, including those characterized by an equation of state parameter resembling dark energy, on the binary's dynamics. We validate our approach by comparing it with previous studies in the common region of validity and extend the analysis to include both local effects, such as dynamical friction, and global gravitational interactions with the stellar-mass black hole, focusing on their dependence on the fluid's properties. Our analysis reveals that these interactions induce de-phasing in gravitational waveforms, with the phase shift influenced by the fluid's equation of state and energy density. We also extend the study to sudden cosmological singularities, finding that, although they can deform the binary's orbit from initially circular to elliptical, their effect on de-phasing is negligible for cosmologically relevant energy densities. By incorporating both the local and global gravitational interactions of a fluid on a two-body system into the equations of motion, this preliminary study provides a framework for understanding the interplay between fluid dynamics and gravitational wave emissions in astrophysical systems. It further reinforces the potential for probing the properties of astrophysically relevant fluids through gravitational wave observations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.07929 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The plot shows r/rISCO as a function of re-scaled time (see Equation (11)), with the lower panel providing a magnified view of the upper panel. For this, we study a binary system with component masses m1 = m2 = 1.4M⊙. The system’s reduced mass µ starts at an initial separation of rinit = 70rISCO in the center of mass (CM) frame. The equations of motion (Equations (13)–(14)) are solved. We compare the evolution of r/… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. A DM spike profile described by Equations (21) and (22). Where α, β, γ, and δ are the relativistic NFW parameters (see Speeney et al. [46] for details); A, w, and q are fit parameters with the following values: η = 1; A = 6.42×10−43 1477.063 × 1.989 × 1030 (kg/m3 ); w = 1.82; q = 1.91; ρ˜ = 0.5 (GeV/cm3 ); m1 = 106M⊙; a = 20 (kpc); α = 0.331; β = −1.66; γ = 0.32; δ = −0.000282; and x = c 2 r Gm1 . The small object i… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The “plus” polarization amplitude, h+(t), is plotted as a function of time. Consider a binary system starting at a circular radius of rinit = 70rISCO at tinit = 0 and obtaining its orbit by solving the system of Equations (25) and (26). Upper Figure: The waveform evolution is depicted for the 2.5 PN correction (solid line) and for the combined 1 PN and 2.5 PN corrections (dashed line). Middle Figure: The waveform ev… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Several stable fluid models accrete onto a Schwarzschild black hole, each obtained by solving the set of Equations (55) and (56) and determining the constant A, using Equation (57). All models are presented in terms of the dimensionless variable x ≡ c 2 r Gm . For each…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Upper Panel: Here, we present the de-phasing at 10 years induced by various accreting fluids. For this setup, we assume a background density ρ∞ = ρcrit ≡ 3H2 0 8πG . We consider a binary system initially located in a circular orbit with a radius rinit = 70 rISCO at tin…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The impact of the sudden singularity induced by an accreting fluid with α = 1 on the radial velocity of the perturber (see Equation (76)) for τs = 13.7109yrs + 5 yrs, β = 666.667 (w∞ = −0.999), and various parameter values of η, expressed as a function of the dimension…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: We study a binary system with an initial circular orbit radius of rinit = 70 rISCO. Post￾Newtonian (PN) corrections at 1 PN and 2.5 PN are applied to the binary’s orbit, which evolves within an accreting fluid characterized by an energy density ρ∞ = ρcrit = 3H2 0 8πG .…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Static Dark Fluid Thin Shells in Schwarzschild-de Sitter Spacetimes: Stability and Black Hole Shadows

    gr-qc 2026-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Stable static dark-fluid shells separating two Schwarzschild–de Sitter spacetimes exist only for m_+/m_->1 and arise at three scales, imprinting observable black-hole shadow deviations.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

95 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    GWTC-1: A Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog of Compact Binary Mergers Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the First and Second Observing Runs

    Abbott, B.P .; Abbott, R.; Abbott, T.; Abraham, S.; Acernese, F.; Ackley, K.; Adams, C.; Adhikari, R.X.; Adya, V .B.; Affeldt, C.; et al. GWTC-1: A Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog of Compact Binary Mergers Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the First and Second Observing Runs. Phys. Rev. X 2019, 9, 031040. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.9.031040

    doi:10.1103/physrevx.9.031040 2019

  2. [2]

    GWTC-2: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the First Half of the Third Observing Run

    Abbott, R.; Abbott, T.D.; Abraham, S.; Acernese, F.; Ackley, K.; Adams, A.; Adams, C.; Adhikari, R.X.; Adya, V .B.; Affeldt, C.; et al. GWTC-2: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the First Half of the Third Observing Run. Phys. Rev. X 2021, 11, 021053. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.11.021053

    doi:10.1103/physrevx.11.021053 2021

  3. [3]

    GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the Second Part of the Third Observing Run

    Abbott, R.; Abbott, T.D.; Acernese, F.; Ackley, K.; Adams, C.; Adhikari, N.; Adhikari, R.X.; Adya, V .B.; Affeldt, C.; Agarwal, D.; et al. GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the Second Part of the Third Observing Run. Phys. Rev. X 2023, 13, 041039. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.13.041039

    doi:10.1103/physrevx.13.041039 2023

  4. [4]

    GWTC-2.1: Deep extended catalog of compact binary coalescences observed by LIGO and Virgo during the first half of the third observing run

    Abbott, R.; Abbott, T.D.; Acernese, F.; Ackley, K.; Adams, C.; Adhikari, N.; Adhikari, R.X.; Adya, V .B.; Affeldt, C.; Agarwal, D.; et al. GWTC-2.1: Deep extended catalog of compact binary coalescences observed by LIGO and Virgo during the first half of the third observing run. Phys. Rev. D 2024, 109, 022001. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.022001

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.022001 2024

  5. [5]

    Laser Interferometer Space Antenna

    Amaro-Seoane, P .; Audley, H.; Babak, S.; Baker, J.; Barausse, E.; Bender, P .; Berti, E.; Binetruy, P .; Born, M.; Bortoluzzi, D.; et al. Laser Interferometer Space Antenna. arXiv 2017, arXiv:1702.00786

    arXiv 2017

  6. [6]

    The Taiji Program in Space for gravitational wave physics and the nature of gravity

    Hu, W.R.; Wu, Y.L. The Taiji Program in Space for gravitational wave physics and the nature of gravity. Natl. Sci. Rev. 2017, 4, 685–686. https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwx116

    doi:10.1093/nsr/nwx116 2017

  7. [7]

    TianQin: A space-borne gravitational wave detector

    Luo, J.; Chen, L.S.; Duan, H.Z.; Gong, Y.G.; Hu, S.; Ji, J.; Liu, Q.; Mei, J.; Milyukov, V .; Sazhin, M.; et al. TianQin: A space-borne gravitational wave detector. Class. Quantum Gravity 2016, 33, 035010. https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/33/3/035010. Universe 2025, 1, 0 29 of 32

    doi:10.1088/0264-9381/33/3/035010 2016

  8. [8]

    The Einstein Telescope: A third-generation gravitational wave observatory

    Punturo, M.; Abernathy, M.; Acernese, F.; Allen, B.; Andersson, N.; Arun, K.; Barone, F.; Barr, B.; Barsuglia, M.; Beker, M.; et al. The Einstein Telescope: A third-generation gravitational wave observatory. Class. Quantum Gravity 2010, 27, 194002. https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/27/19/194002

    doi:10.1088/0264-9381/27/19/194002 2010

Show all 95 references
  1. [9]

    Possibility of direct measurement of the acceleration of the universe using 0.1-Hz band laser interferometer gravitational wave antenna in space

    Seto, N.; Kawamura, S.; Nakamura, T. Possibility of direct measurement of the acceleration of the universe using 0.1-Hz band laser interferometer gravitational wave antenna in space. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2001, 87, 221103. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett. 87.221103

    2001 doi

  2. [10]

    Gravitational radiation from binary systems in massive graviton theories

    Poddar, T.K.; Mohanty, S.; Jana, S. Gravitational radiation from binary systems in massive graviton theories. JCAP 2022, 3, 019. https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2022/03/019

    2022 doi

  3. [11]

    Probing modified gravitational wave propagation with strongly lensed coalescing binaries

    Finke, A.; Foffa, S.; Iacovelli, F.; Maggiore, M.; Mancarella, M. Probing modified gravitational wave propagation with strongly lensed coalescing binaries. Phys. Rev. D 2021, 104, 084057. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.084057

    2021 doi

  4. [12]

    Measuring the propagation speed of gravitational waves with LISA

    Baker, T.; Calcagni, G.; Chen, A.; Fasiello, M.; Lombriser, L.; Martinovic, K.; Pieroni, M.; Sakellariadou, M.; Tasinato, G.; Bertacca, D.; et al. Measuring the propagation speed of gravitational waves with LISA. JCAP 2022, 8, 031. https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7 516/2022/08/031

    2022 doi

  5. [13]

    Black-hole ringdown as a probe of higher-curvature gravity theories

    Silva, H.O.; Ghosh, A.; Buonanno, A. Black-hole ringdown as a probe of higher-curvature gravity theories. Phys. Rev. D 2023, 107, 044030. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.107.044030

    2023 doi

  6. [14]

    Strong constraints on the gravitational law from Gaia DR3 wide binaries

    Banik, I.; Pittordis, C.; Sutherland, W.; Famaey, B.; Ibata, R.; Mieske, S.; Zhao, H. Strong constraints on the gravitational law from Gaia DR3 wide binaries. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2024, 527, 4573–4615. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad3393

    2024 doi

  7. [15]

    Parametrized post-Einsteinian framework for precessing binaries.Phys

    Loutrel, N.; Pani, P .; Yunes, N. Parametrized post-Einsteinian framework for precessing binaries.Phys. Rev. D 2023, 107, 044046. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.107.044046

    2023 doi

  8. [16]

    Parameter estimation of eccentric gravitational waves with a decihertz observatory and its cosmological implications

    Yang, T.; Cai, R.G.; Cao, Z.; Lee, H.M. Parameter estimation of eccentric gravitational waves with a decihertz observatory and its cosmological implications. Phys. Rev. D 2023, 107, 043539. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.107.043539

    2023 doi

  9. [17]

    Constraining Horndeski theory with gravitational waves from coalescing binaries

    Quartin, M.; Tsujikawa, S.; Amendola, L.; Sturani, R. Constraining Horndeski theory with gravitational waves from coalescing binaries. JCAP 2023, 8, 049. https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2023/08/049

    2023 doi

  10. [18]

    Prospects of constraining f(T) gravity with the third-generation gravitational-wave detectors

    Chen, R.; Wang, Y.Y.; Zu, L.; Fan, Y.Z. Prospects of constraining f(T) gravity with the third-generation gravitational-wave detectors. Phys. Rev. D 2024, 109, 024041. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.024041

    2024 doi

  11. [19]

    GW170817: Measurements of neutron star radii and equation of state

    Abbott, B.P .; Abbott, R.; Abbott, T.D.; Acernese, F.; Ackley, K.; Adams, C.; Adams, T.; Addesso, P .; Adhikari, R.X.; Adya, V .B.; et al. GW170817: Measurements of neutron star radii and equation of state. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2018, 121, 161101. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLet...

    2018 doi

  12. [20]

    Properties of the binary neutron star merger GW170817

    Abbott, B.P .; Abbott, R.; Abbott, T.D.; Acernese, F.; Ackley, K.; Adams, C.; Adams, T.; Addesso, P .; Adhikari, R.X.; Adya, V .B.; et al. Properties of the binary neutron star merger GW170817. Phys. Rev. X 2019, 9, 011001. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.9.0110 01

    2019 doi

  13. [21]

    Observation of Gravitational Waves from Two Neutron Star–Black Hole Coalescences

    Abbott, R.; Abbott, T.D.; Abraham, S.; Acernese, F.; Ackley, K.; Adams, A.; Adams, C.; Adhikari, R.X.; Adya, V .B.; Affeldt, C.; et al. Observation of Gravitational Waves from Two Neutron Star–Black Hole Coalescences. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2021, 915, L5. https://doi.org/10.3847/...

    2021 doi

  14. [22]

    Multimessenger constraints on the neutron-star equation of state and the Hubble constant

    Dietrich, T.; Coughlin, M.W.; Pang, P .T.H.; Bulla, M.; Heinzel, J.; Issa, L.; Tews, I.; Antier, S. Multimessenger constraints on the neutron-star equation of state and the Hubble constant. Science 2020, 370, 1450–1453. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb4317

    2020 doi

  15. [23]

    Quarkyonic Matter and Neutron Stars

    McLerran, L.; Reddy, S. Quarkyonic Matter and Neutron Stars. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2019, 122, 122701. https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.122.122701

    2019

  16. [24]

    New Probe of Dark-Matter Properties: Gravitational Waves from an Intermediate-Mass Black Hole Embedded in a Dark-Matter Minispike

    Eda, K.; Itoh, Y.; Kuroyanagi, S.; Silk, J. New Probe of Dark-Matter Properties: Gravitational Waves from an Intermediate-Mass Black Hole Embedded in a Dark-Matter Minispike. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2013, 110, 221101. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110. 221101

    2013 doi

  17. [25]

    Gravitational waves as a probe of dark matter minispikes

    Eda, K.; Itoh, Y.; Kuroyanagi, S.; Silk, J. Gravitational waves as a probe of dark matter minispikes. Phys. Rev. D 2015, 91, 044045. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.91.044045

    2015 doi

  18. [26]

    Black holes surrounded by generic matter distributions: Polar perturbations and energy flux

    Speeney, N.; Berti, E.; Cardoso, V .; Maselli, A. Black holes surrounded by generic matter distributions: Polar perturbations and energy flux. Phys. Rev. D 2024, 109, 084068. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.084068

    2024 doi

  19. [27]

    Dynamical Friction

    Chandrasekhar, S. Dynamical Friction. I. General Considerations: The Coefficient of Dynamical Friction. Astrophys. J. 1943, 97, 255. https://doi.org/10.1086/144517

    1943 doi

  20. [28]

    Probing dark matter spikes via gravitational waves of extreme-mass-ratio inspirals

    Li, G.L.; Tang, Y.; Wu, Y.L. Probing dark matter spikes via gravitational waves of extreme-mass-ratio inspirals. Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 2022, 65, 100412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-022-1930-9

    2022 doi

  21. [29]

    Measuring dark matter spikes around primordial black holes with Einstein Telescope and Cosmic Explorer

    Cole, P .S.; Coogan, A.; Kavanagh, B.J.; Bertone, G. Measuring dark matter spikes around primordial black holes with Einstein Telescope and Cosmic Explorer. Phys. Rev. D 2023, 107, 083006. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.107.083006

    2023 doi

  22. [30]

    The effect of mission duration on LISA science objectives

    Amaro, Seoane, P .; Arca, Sedda, M.; Babak, S.; Berry, C.P .; Berti, E.; Bertone, G.; Blas, D.; Bogdanovi´ c, T.; Bonetti, M.; Breivik, K.; et al. The effect of mission duration on LISA science objectives. Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 2022, 54, 3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714 -021-...

    2022 doi

  23. [31]

    Star distribution around a massive black hole in a globular cluster

    Bahcall, J.N.; Wolf, R.A. Star distribution around a massive black hole in a globular cluster. Astrophys. J. 1976, 209, 214–232. https://doi.org/10.1086/154711

    1976 doi

  24. [32]

    Gravitational collapse and related phenomena from an empirical point of view, or, black holes are where you find them

    Peebles, P .J.E. Gravitational collapse and related phenomena from an empirical point of view, or, black holes are where you find them. Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 1972, 3, 63–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00755923

    1972 doi

  25. [33]

    Models of Galaxies with Central Black Holes: Adiabatic Growth in Spherical Galaxies

    Quinlan, G.D.; Hernquist, L.; Sigurdsson, S. Models of Galaxies with Central Black Holes: Adiabatic Growth in Spherical Galaxies. Astrophys. J. 1995, 440, 554–564

    1995

  26. [34]

    Dark matter distributions around massive black holes: A general relativistic analysis

    Sadeghian, L.; Ferrer, F.; Will, C.M. Dark matter distributions around massive black holes: A general relativistic analysis. Phys. Rev. D 2013, 88, 063522. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.88.063522

    2013 doi

  27. [35]

    Dark matter spikes in the vicinity of Kerr black holes

    Ferrer, F.; da Rosa, A.M.; Will, C.M. Dark matter spikes in the vicinity of Kerr black holes. Phys. Rev. D 2017, 96, 083014. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.96.083014

    2017 doi

  28. [36]

    A Dark matter spike at the galactic center? Phys

    Ullio, P .; Zhao, H.; Kamionkowski, M. A Dark matter spike at the galactic center? Phys. Rev. D 2001, 64, 043504. https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.64.043504

    2001 doi

  29. [37]

    Dark matter spikes and annihilation radiation from the galactic center

    Merritt, D.; Milosavljevic, M.; Verde, L.; Jimenez, R. Dark matter spikes and annihilation radiation from the galactic center. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2002, 88, 191301. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.191301

    2002 doi

  30. [38]

    A new signature of dark matter annihilations: Gamma-rays from intermediate-mass black holes

    Bertone, G.; Zentner, A.R.; Silk, J. A new signature of dark matter annihilations: Gamma-rays from intermediate-mass black holes. Phys. Rev. D 2005, 72, 103517. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.72.103517

    2005 doi

  31. [39]

    Mini-dark halos with intermediate mass black holes

    Zhao, H.S.; Silk, J. Mini-dark halos with intermediate mass black holes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005, 95, 011301. https://doi.org/10.110 3/PhysRevLett.95.011301

    2005

  32. [40]

    Detecting dark matter around black holes with gravitational waves: Effects of dark-matter dynamics on the gravitational waveform

    Kavanagh, B.J.; Nichols, D.A.; Bertone, G.; Gaggero, D. Detecting dark matter around black holes with gravitational waves: Effects of dark-matter dynamics on the gravitational waveform. Phys. Rev. D 2020, 102, 083006. https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevD.102.083006

    2020

  33. [41]

    Measuring the dark matter environments of black hole binaries with gravitational waves

    Coogan, A.; Bertone, G.; Gaggero, D.; Kavanagh, B.J.; Nichols, D.A. Measuring the dark matter environments of black hole binaries with gravitational waves. Phys. Rev. D 2022, 105, 043009. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.105.043009

    2022 doi

  34. [42]

    Black holes surrounded by generic dark matter profiles: Appearance and gravitational- wave emission

    Figueiredo, E.; Maselli, A.; Cardoso, V . Black holes surrounded by generic dark matter profiles: Appearance and gravitational- wave emission. Phys. Rev. D 2023, 107, 104033. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.107.104033

    2023 doi

  35. [43]

    Post-Newtonian Effects in Compact Binaries with a Dark Matter Spike: A Lagrangian Approach

    Montalvo, D.; Smith-Orlik, A.; Rastgoo, S.; Sagunski, L.; Becker, N.; Khan, H. Post-Newtonian Effects in Compact Binaries with a Dark Matter Spike: A Lagrangian Approach. Universe 2024, 10, 427. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe10110427

    2024 doi

  36. [44]

    Dark matter, black holes, and gravitational waves

    Bertone, G. Dark matter, black holes, and gravitational waves. Nucl. Phys. B 2024, 1003, 116487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. nuclphysb.2024.116487

    2024

  37. [45]

    Gravitational Waves

    Maggiore, M. Gravitational Waves. Vol. 2: Astrophysics and Cosmology ; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2018

    2018

  38. [46]

    Impact of relativistic corrections on the detectability of dark-matter spikes with gravitational waves

    Speeney, N.; Antonelli, A.; Baibhav, V .; Berti, E. Impact of relativistic corrections on the detectability of dark-matter spikes with gravitational waves. Phys. Rev. D 2022, 106, 044027. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.106.044027

    2022 doi

  39. [47]

    A Universal density profile from hierarchical clustering

    Navarro, J.F.; Frenk, C.S.; White, S.D.M. A Universal density profile from hierarchical clustering. Astrophys. J. 1997, 490, 493–508. https://doi.org/10.1086/304888

    1997 doi

  40. [48]

    Accretion onto a moving black hole: An exact solution

    Petrich, L.I.; Shapiro, S.L.; Teukolsky, S.A. Accretion onto a moving black hole: An exact solution. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1988, 60, 1781–1784. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.60.1781

    1988 doi

  41. [49]

    Black hole mass decreasing due to phantom energy accretion.Phys

    Babichev, E.; Dokuchaev, V .; Eroshenko, Y. Black hole mass decreasing due to phantom energy accretion.Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004, 93, 021102. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.021102

    2004 doi

  42. [50]

    On spherically symmetrical accretion

    Bondi, H. On spherically symmetrical accretion. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 1952, 112, 195. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/112.2. 195

    1952 doi

  43. [51]

    Accretion of matter by condensed objects

    Michel, F.C. Accretion of matter by condensed objects. Astrophys. Space Sci. 1972, 15, 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00649 949

    1972 doi

  44. [52]

    Stability of stationary, spherical accretion onto a Schwarzschild black hole

    Moncrief, V . Stability of stationary, spherical accretion onto a Schwarzschild black hole. Astroph. J. 1980, 235, 1038–1046. https://doi.org/10.1086/157707

    1980 doi

  45. [53]

    Black holes in the presence of dark energy.Phys

    Babichev, E.O.; Dokuchaev, V .I.; Eroshenko, Y.N. Black holes in the presence of dark energy.Phys. Uspekhi 2013, 56, 1155–1175. https://doi.org/10.3367/UFNe.0183.201312a.1257

    2013

  46. [54]

    Accretion Processes for General Spherically Symmetric Compact Objects

    Bahamonde, S.; Jamil, M. Accretion Processes for General Spherically Symmetric Compact Objects. Eur. Phys. J. C 2015, 75, 508. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-015-3734-9

    2015 doi

  47. [55]

    Radial accretion flows on static spherically symmetric black holes

    Chaverra, E.; Sarbach, O. Radial accretion flows on static spherically symmetric black holes. Class. Quantum Gravity 2015, 32, 155006. https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/32/15/155006

    2015 doi

  48. [56]

    Michel accretion of a polytropic fluid with adiabatic index γ > 5/3: Global flows versus homoclinic orbits

    Chaverra, E.; Mach, P .; Sarbach, O. Michel accretion of a polytropic fluid with adiabatic index γ > 5/3: Global flows versus homoclinic orbits. Class. Quantum Gravity 2016, 33, 105016. https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/33/10/105016

    2016 doi

  49. [57]

    Accretion onto Some Well-Known Regular Black Holes

    Jawad, A.; Shahzad, M.U. Accretion onto Some Well-Known Regular Black Holes. Eur. Phys. J. C 2016, 76, 123. https: //doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-3967-2. Universe 2025, 1, 0 31 of 32

    2016 doi

  50. [58]

    Spherical Accretion Flow onto General Parameterized Spherically Symmetric Black Hole Spacetimes

    Yang, S.; Liu, C.; Zhu, T.; Zhao, L.; Wu, Q.; Yang, K.; Jamil, M. Spherical Accretion Flow onto General Parameterized Spherically Symmetric Black Hole Spacetimes. Chin. Phys. C 2021, 45, 015102. https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1137/abc066

    2021 doi

  51. [59]

    Spherical accretion: Bondi, Michel, and rotating black holes

    Aguayo-Ortiz, A.; Tejeda, E.; Sarbach, O.; López-Cámara, D. Spherical accretion: Bondi, Michel, and rotating black holes. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2021, 504, 5039–5053. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab1127

    2021 doi

  52. [60]

    Possible Causes of False General Relativity Violations in Gravitational Wave Observations

    Gupta, A.; Arun, K.G.; Barausse, E.; Bernard, L.; Berti, E.; Bhat, S.A.; Buonanno, A.; Cardoso, V .; Cheung, S.Y.; Clarke, T.A.; et al. Possible Causes of False General Relativity Violations in Gravitational Wave Observations. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2405.02197

    2024 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Fluid accretion onto a spherical black hole: Relativistic description versus Bondi model

    Malec, E. Fluid accretion onto a spherical black hole: Relativistic description versus Bondi model. Phys. Rev. D 1999, 60, 104043. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.60.104043

    1999 doi

  54. [62]

    Dark energy cosmology with generalized linear equation of state.Class

    Babichev, E.; Dokuchaev, V .; Eroshenko, Y. Dark energy cosmology with generalized linear equation of state.Class. Quantum Gravity 2005, 22, 143–154. https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/22/1/010

    2005 doi

  55. [63]

    Planck 2018 results

    Aghanim, N.; Akrami, Y.; Ashdown, M.; Aumont, J.; Baccigalupi, C.; Ballardini, M.; B.; ay, A.J.; Barreiro, R.B.; Bartolo, N.; Basak, S.; et al. Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters. Astron. Astrophys. 2020, 641, A6. Erratum in Astron. Astrophys. 2021, 652, C4. http...

    2018 doi

  56. [64]

    The Dynamics of precessing binary black holes using the post-Newtonian approximation

    Hartl, M.D.; Buonanno, A. The Dynamics of precessing binary black holes using the post-Newtonian approximation. Phys. Rev. D 2005, 71, 024027. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.71.024027

    2005 doi

  57. [65]

    An Improved effective-one-body Hamiltonian for spinning black-hole binaries

    Barausse, E.; Buonanno, A. An Improved effective-one-body Hamiltonian for spinning black-hole binaries. Phys. Rev. D 2010, 81, 084024. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.81.084024

    2010 doi

  58. [66]

    Sudden future singularities

    Barrow, J.D. Sudden future singularities. Class. Quantum Gravity 2004, 21, L79–L82. https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/21/11/ L03

    2004 doi

  59. [67]

    PostNewtonian gravitational radiation and equations of motion via direct integration of the relaxed Einstein equations

    Pati, M.E.; Will, C.M. PostNewtonian gravitational radiation and equations of motion via direct integration of the relaxed Einstein equations. 1. Foundations. Phys. Rev. D 2000, 62, 124015. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.62.124015

    doi

  60. [68]

    Gravitational Waves

    Maggiore, M. Gravitational Waves. Vol. 1: Theory and Experiments ; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2007. https://doi.org/10 .1093/acprof:oso/9780198570745.001.0001

    2007

  61. [69]

    On the unreasonable effectiveness of the post-Newtonian approximation in gravitational physics

    Will, C.M. On the unreasonable effectiveness of the post-Newtonian approximation in gravitational physics. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 5938. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1103127108

    2011 doi

  62. [70]

    General Relativity; Graduate Texts in Physics; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2013

    Straumann, N. General Relativity; Graduate Texts in Physics; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2013. https://doi.org/10.100 7/978-94-007-5410-2

    2013

  63. [71]

    Gravitational Radiation from Post-Newtonian Sources and Inspiralling Compact Binaries

    Blanchet, L. Gravitational Radiation from Post-Newtonian Sources and Inspiralling Compact Binaries. Living Rev. Relativ. 2014, 17, 2. https://doi.org/10.12942/lrr-2014-2

    2014 doi

  64. [72]

    PostNewtonian gravitational radiation and equations of motion via direct integration of the relaxed Einstein equations

    Pati, M.E.; Will, C.M. PostNewtonian gravitational radiation and equations of motion via direct integration of the relaxed Einstein equations. 2. Two-body equations of motion to second postNewtonian order, and radiation reaction to 3.5 postNewtonia order. Phys. Rev. D 2002, 65...

    2002 doi

  65. [73]

    Transition from inspiral to plunge in binary black hole coalescences

    Buonanno, A.; Damour, T. Transition from inspiral to plunge in binary black hole coalescences. Phys. Rev. D 2000, 62, 064015. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.62.064015

    2000 doi

  66. [74]

    Improved gravitational radiation time-scales: Significance for LISA and LIGO-Virgo sources

    Zwick, L.; Capelo, P .R.; Bortolas, E.; Mayer, L.; Amaro-Seoane, P . Improved gravitational radiation time-scales: Significance for LISA and LIGO-Virgo sources. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2020, 495, 2321–2331. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa1314

    2020 doi

  67. [75]

    Astrophysics with the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna

    Amaro-Seoane, P .; Andrews, J.; Arca, Sedda, M.; Askar, A.; Baghi, Q.; Balasov, R.; Bartos, I.; Bavera, S.S.; Bellovary, J.; Berry, C.P .; et al. Astrophysics with the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna. Living Rev. Relativ. 2023, 26, 2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41114 -022-00041-y

    2023 doi

  68. [76]

    The Approximation of radiative effects in relativistic gravity - Gravitational radiation reaction and energy loss in nearly Newtonian systems

    Walker, M.; Will, C.M. The Approximation of radiative effects in relativistic gravity - Gravitational radiation reaction and energy loss in nearly Newtonian systems. Astrophys. J. Lett. 1980, 242, L129–L133. https://doi.org/10.1086/183417

    1980 doi

  69. [77]

    Relativistic dynamical friction in a collisional fluid

    Barausse, E. Relativistic dynamical friction in a collisional fluid. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2007, 382, 826–834. https: //doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12408.x

    2007

  70. [78]

    Dynamical friction from scalar dark matter in the relativistic regime

    Traykova, D.; Clough, K.; Helfer, T.; Berti, E.; Ferreira, P .G.; Hui, L. Dynamical friction from scalar dark matter in the relativistic regime. Phys. Rev. D 2021, 104, 103014. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.103014

    2021 doi

  71. [79]

    Primordial black holes captured by neutron stars: Relativistic point-mass treatment

    Baumgarte, T.W.; Shapiro, S.L. Primordial black holes captured by neutron stars: Relativistic point-mass treatment. Phys. Rev. D 2024, 109, 123012. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.123012

    2024 doi

  72. [80]

    To circularize or not to circularize? Orbital evolution of satellite galaxies

    Hashimoto, Y.; Funato, Y.; Makino, J. To circularize or not to circularize? Orbital evolution of satellite galaxies. Astrophys. J. 2003, 582, 196–201. https://doi.org/10.1086/344260

    2003 doi

  73. [81]

    Dynamical friction on satellite galaxies

    Fujii, M.; Funato, Y.; Makino, J. Dynamical friction on satellite galaxies. Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn. 2006, 58, 743. https: //doi.org/10.1093/pasj/58.4.743

    2006 doi

  74. [82]

    Dynamical Friction of a Circular-Orbit Perturber in a Gaseous Medium

    Kim, H.; Kim, W.T. Dynamical Friction of a Circular-Orbit Perturber in a Gaseous Medium. Astrophys. J. 2007, 665, 432. https://doi.org/10.1086/519302

    2007 doi

  75. [83]

    Dynamical friction of black holes in ultralight dark matter

    Vicente, R.; Cardoso, V . Dynamical friction of black holes in ultralight dark matter. Phys. Rev. D 2022, 105, 083008. https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.105.083008. Universe 2025, 1, 0 32 of 32

    2022 doi

  76. [84]

    Extreme dark matter tests with extreme mass ratio inspirals

    Hannuksela, O.A.; Ng, K.C.Y.; Li, T.G.F. Extreme dark matter tests with extreme mass ratio inspirals. Phys. Rev. D 2020, 102, 103022. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.102.103022

    2020 doi

  77. [85]

    General Relativity: An Introduction for Physicists ; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2006

    Hobson, M.P .; Efstathiou, G.P .; Lasenby, A.N. General Relativity: An Introduction for Physicists ; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2006

    2006

  78. [86]

    The Accretion of dark energy onto a black hole.J

    Babichev, E.; Dokuchaev, V .; Eroshenko, Y. The Accretion of dark energy onto a black hole.J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 2005, 100, 528–538. https://doi.org/10.1134/1.1901765

    2005 doi

  79. [87]

    Accretion and Evaporation of Modified Hayward Black Hole

    Debnath, U. Accretion and Evaporation of Modified Hayward Black Hole. Eur. Phys. J. C 2015, 75, 129. https://doi.org/10.1140/ epjc/s10052-015-3349-1

    2015

  80. [88]

    Does the mass of a black hole decrease due to the accretion of phantom energy.Phys

    Gao, C.; Chen, X.; Faraoni, V .; Shen, Y.G. Does the mass of a black hole decrease due to the accretion of phantom energy.Phys. Rev. D 2008, 78, 024008. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.78.024008

    2008 doi

  81. [89]

    Dark Energy Accretion onto black holes in a cosmic scenario

    Martin-Moruno, P .; Marrakchi, A.E.L.; Robles-Perez, S.; Gonzalez-Diaz, P .F. Dark Energy Accretion onto black holes in a cosmic scenario. Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 2009, 41, 2797–2811. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-009-0808-8

    2009 doi

  82. [90]

    Bondi accretion onto cosmological black holes

    Karkowski, J.; Malec, E. Bondi accretion onto cosmological black holes. Phys. Rev. D 2013, 87, 044007. https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevD.87.044007

    2013

  83. [91]

    Can environmental effects spoil precision gravitational-wave astrophysics?Phys

    Barausse, E.; Cardoso, V .; Pani, P . Can environmental effects spoil precision gravitational-wave astrophysics?Phys. Rev. D 2014, 89, 104059. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.89.104059

    2014 doi

  84. [92]

    Finite-time cosmological singularities and the possible fate of the Universe

    de Haro, J.; Nojiri, S.; Odintsov, S.D.; Oikonomou, V .K.; Pan, S. Finite-time cosmological singularities and the possible fate of the Universe. Phys. Rep. 2023, 1034, 1–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2023.09.003

    2023 doi

  85. [93]

    Effects of a Late Gravitational Transition on Gravitational Waves and Anticipated Constraints

    Paraskevas, E.A.; Perivolaropoulos, L. Effects of a Late Gravitational Transition on Gravitational Waves and Anticipated Constraints. Universe 2023, 9, 317. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe9070317

    2023 doi

  86. [94]

    Chapter 1—Mathematical Preliminaries

    Arfken, G.B.; Weber, H.J.; Harris, F.E. Chapter 1—Mathematical Preliminaries. In Mathematical Methods for Physicists , 7th ed.; Arfken, G.B., Weber, H.J., Harris, F.E., Eds.; Academic Press: Boston, MA, USA, 2013; pp. 1–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0 -12-384654-9.00001-3

    2013 doi

  87. [95]

    Classical Electrodynamics; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1998

    Jackson, J.D. Classical Electrodynamics; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1998. Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/o...

    1998

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.