Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 48 references

Impact of Electric Spatially Discordant Alternans on Cardiac Magnetic Field

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Using a 1D cardiac fiber model, this paper shows that the magnetic field produced by heart tissue exposes spatially discordant alternans, with magnetic and electrical node locations matching within a few millimeters.

desk verdict A clean computational feasibility study showing SDA nodes are reproduced in the near-field magnetic norm, but the 'reliably detect' claim needs a volume-conductor and sensor model before it is earned. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.08480 v1 pith:GZXRPQVR submitted 2025-02-12 physics.med-ph physics.bio-ph

Martina Nicoletti , Anna Crispino , Alessandro Loppini , Alessio Gizzi , Letizia Chiodo , Christian Cherubini , Simonetta Filippi This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.med-phphysics.bio-ph
keywords spatiallydiscordantalternanscardiacmagneticfieldbiomagnetismrestitutioncurveactionpotentialupstroketemperaturedependenceBiot-Savartlaw
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper uses a one-dimensional computer model of a cardiac fiber to argue that the magnetic field generated by heart tissue can expose spatially discordant alternans (SDA), a rhythm disturbance in which neighboring regions alternate out of phase, creating steep repolarization gradients that can trigger reentry. The authors show that the spatial map of the peak magnetic field magnitude $|B|_{\max}$ reproduces the out-of-phase pattern seen in action potential duration, with the node position—the location where alternans changes phase—matching between electrical and magnetic indicators to within a few millimeters ($Z_{\mathrm{APD}}=1.08$ cm versus $Z_B=1.11$ cm at 37 °C). They also find that magnetic restitution curves invert relative to classic action-potential-duration curves but closely track the maximum upstroke velocity $\partial V/\partial t_{\max}$, because the magnetic field is tied to the action potential's spatial derivative. If these results carry to real tissue, magnetic field measurements could become a non-invasive way to locate SDA nodes and assess arrhythmic risk without inserting electrodes.

What carries the argument

The machinery that carries the argument is the derivative relation between the action potential and the magnetic field. For a straight cylindrical fiber the current density is $J(t,z')=-\sigma\,\partial V_m/\partial z'$, and Biot-Savart integration gives a field whose magnitude peaks at the depolarization upstroke, where $\partial V_m/\partial t$ is largest. Because alternans changes the upstroke timing and amplitude in adjacent regions, the peak field magnitude inherits the alternating pattern, and the position where the two beats have equal $|B|_{\max}$ defines the magnetic node. The simulations use a temperature-dependent four-variable phenomenological model with Moore and Arrhenius factors, and the analysis uses pointwise restitution curves rather than spatial averages to avoid washing out SDA.

What would settle it

Compute the same SDA protocol with a bidomain model that includes extracellular volume currents and evaluate the magnetic field at a realistic sensor standoff of 1 mm to 1 cm; if the $|B|_{\max}$ node shifts by more than the few-millimeter agreement reported here, or if the field amplitude falls below sensor noise, the central claim fails. An experimental check would be a paced cardiac fiber or monolayer measured with a high-sensitivity magnetometer at about 50 µm standoff, testing whether the magnetic node coincides with the APD node within a few millimeters.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that spatially discordant alternans have a magnetic signature that a simple scalar indicator can capture. On a 3 cm fiber, the paper demonstrates that for two consecutive beats (n−1 and n), the spatial profile of the peak magnetic field norm $|B|_{\max}$ alternates out of phase in the same way as $\mathrm{APD}_{80}$, and the nodes of the two indicators coincide within a few millimeters at 37 °C and 33 °C. The paper further claims that the magnetic restitution curves—$|B|_{\max}$ versus pacing cycle length—are ordered inversely to APD restitution curves but mirror the upstroke velocity curves, because the current density $J=-\sigma\,\partial V_m/\partial z'$ and hence the Biot-Savart field are proportional to the spatial derivative of the transmembrane potential. This establishes, in the authors' words, a 'strong spatial correlation between electrical and magnetic indicators' and supports the capability of magnetic field measurements to reliably detect SDA.

Load-bearing premise

The claim that magnetic field measurements can detect SDA rests on the assumption that the field computed from an isolated 1D fiber in vacuum—neglecting extracellular volume currents and sensor noise, and evaluated at 50 µm—faithfully represents a measurable signal; if volume-current cancellation or practical sensor distance distorts the field, the node correspondence would not survive.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Magnetic field mapping can identify the location of SDA nodes without electrode contact, potentially guiding ablation or pacing strategies aimed at arrhythmia prevention.
  • Because magnetic restitution curves track the upstroke rather than APD, magnetic measurements are a more direct readout of fast sodium-channel dynamics than standard electrical indicators.
  • The temperature dependence of node position in the model implies that magnetic field maps could track how hypothermia shifts arrhythmic risk in clinical cooling protocols.
  • The magnetic bifurcation point in the restitution protocol is easier to detect than the APD bifurcation point, so magnetic biomarkers may detect alternans onset earlier.
  • The same 1D thermo-electro-magnetic framework can be extended to more complex geometries to test whether the node correspondence persists in tissue and whole hearts.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • In a real tissue bath, extracellular volume currents are likely to partially cancel the intracellular magnetic field; at standoff distances of millimeters to centimeters, the node correspondence seen at 50 µm may blur or shift, a risk the paper does not quantify.
  • The magnetic field's lock to the upstroke suggests a two-channel diagnostic: combining magnetic maps (sodium-driven upstroke) with optical or electrical APD maps (repolarization) could separate channelopathy subtypes, a testable hypothesis for Brugada or Long-QT 3.
  • If single-cell or fiber-level NV-diamond magnetometers reach the nT sensitivity this model predicts at 50 µm, the predicted node coincidence could be checked directly in a paced cardiac fiber preparation.
  • The model parameters were fine-tuned to reproduce SDA; a natural next step is to test whether the magnetic signature persists with parameter sets derived from experimental restitution data rather than tuned to the phenomenon.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper simulates a one-dimensional cardiac fiber with a four-variable phenomenological model under a pacing-down restitution protocol at temperatures between 29 °C and 40 °C, computes the magnetic field from the simulated transmembrane potential using J = −σ∂Vm/∂z and Biot–Savart integration (Eqs. (18)–(19)), and compares APD80-based and |B|max-based markers of spatially discordant alternans (SDA). The authors report electric and magnetic restitution curves, spatial maps of APD80 and |B|max, and node positions for SDA at selected pacing cycle lengths, and they conclude that magnetic field measurements reliably detect SDA and temperature-dependent changes in cardiac action potentials.

Significance. As an in silico proof of concept, the paper offers a clear and internally consistent forward-modeling pipeline: the electrical model, current-density estimate, and magnetic-field integral are explicit and reproducible in structure, and the observation that a simple scalar magnetic marker inherits the spatial organization of SDA is a useful methodological pointer for biomagnetic monitoring. The connection between |B|max and the upstroke dynamics via Eqs. (18)–(20) is clearly laid out. However, the significance as a measurement claim is limited: the magnetic field is computed from the same simulated voltage that defines the APD-based ground truth, so the node agreement in Fig. 3 is an in-model consistency result rather than an independent validation. The absence of a volume conductor, sensor standoff, and noise means the paper supports a qualitative prediction, not the stated conclusion that magnetic field measurements 'reliably detect' SDA in a practical setting.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and Results, 'Electric and magnetic SDA'] The abstract and the final paragraph of the SDA results state that magnetic field measurements 'effectively detect' and 'reliably detect' SDA. This is the central claim, but the only supporting evidence is the spatial agreement between APD80 and |B|max nodes in Fig. 3, where both quantities are computed from the same simulated Vm through Eqs. (18)–(19). The agreement is therefore an in-model consistency result, not an independent measurement. To support the detection wording, the paper should either add an end-to-end model with a realistic volume conductor and a sensor model (standoff, noise, finite sensitivity) or systematically rephrase all detection conclusions as statements about the computed magnetic field in the idealized simulation. The second option is the minimum needed for the current scope.
  2. [Methods, 'Magnetic Field Modeling'] The neglect of extracellular volume currents is justified by the statement that the action potential wavelength is much larger than the 50 µm evaluation distance. That condition alone is not sufficient: magnetic-field cancellation by extracellular return currents depends on the conductivity and geometry of the bath and on the sensor distance, as in the cited Swinney–Wikswo calculation [47]. Additionally, a 50 µm distance from the source axis is only 10 µm from the surface of the 40 µm radius fiber, which is far below any practical sensor standoff in tissue. Please provide a quantitative estimate of the extracellular contribution at the evaluation distance, or include a bidomain/saline-bath simulation, and state over what standoff range the computed node positions remain stable. Without this, the claim that the computed field approximates a measurable signal is not fully established.
  3. [Methods, 'Cardiac Electrophysiology Modeling'] The model parameters are described as 'opportunely fine-tuned to reproduce SDA' in the one-dimensional cable. Because the SDA regime is partly constructed by parameter choice, the subsequent conclusion that the magnetic field 'demonstrates' SDA detection overstates the generality of the result. The paper should explicitly frame the SDA conditions as a model scenario and, ideally, include a sensitivity analysis over parameters and pacing cycle lengths to show that the node correspondence between APD and |B|max is robust rather than a consequence of the chosen tuning.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Methods, 'Cardiac Electrophysiology Modeling'] Table I reports initial conditions as 'u =, v = 1, w = 0, s = 1', but the numerical value for u is missing; please supply it.
  2. [Methods, 'Magnetic Field Modeling'] Equation (19) uses I(t, z′) but the current I is not defined in terms of the current density J from Eq. (18); please specify I = J · A (or the equivalent cross-sectional integral) and state the units.
  3. [Methods, 'Cardiac Electrophysiology Modeling' and Results] The pacing-down restitution protocol is described only qualitatively. Please report the PCL range, decrement step, number of beats at each PCL, and the criteria used to define 'alternans onset' and 'fully developed alternans' so that the results are reproducible.
  4. [Results, 'Electric and magnetic SDA'] Fig. 3 reports node positions for a single PCL per temperature and regime. Please state whether the node positions are stable across neighboring PCLs or provide a measure of variability, since the claim of 'a few millimeters' agreement is based on point values.
  5. [Results, 'Electric and magnetic alternans'] The statement that the magnetic restitution curves show the alternans onset 'more easily identifiable' than APD curves is not quantified. Please define a quantitative detection criterion (e.g., beat-to-beat difference threshold) or soften the claim.
  6. [Methods and Discussion] There are minor typographical issues, including 'elctrical' in the Methods heading and 'Moore (η(T))' where the intended name may be something else; please proofread.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No qualifying circular step; the magnetic field is a stated forward-model consequence of the simulated voltage, and the SDA node comparison is not identity-defined.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is: simulate Vm with a phenomenological cable model; compute current density J = -sigma dVm/dz (Eq. 18); compute B by Biot-Savart (Eq. 19); then compare APD80 and |B|max spatial maps. This is a forward electrophysiology-to-magnetometry calculation, not a circular definition: APD80 is defined from repolarization timing, while |B|max is defined from the upstroke derivative, so the close node positions (Z_APD = 1.08 cm vs Z_B = 1.11 cm at 37 C) are a nontrivial consequence rather than an identity. The model parameters are admittedly 'opportunely fine-tuned to reproduce SDA' (Methods, Cardiac Electrophysiology Modeling), and B is computed from the same Vm, so the in-silico demonstration does not independently validate a real magnetic measurement; but this is an external-validity gap, not a circular reduction. The paper explicitly derives the B-APD relationship from Eqs. (18)-(20) and states its assumptions (50 um standoff, neglect of extracellular volume currents), so no step hides an input as an output. Self-citations, including [44], supply background and the previous thermo-electro-magnetic framework, but the key equations are restated in the paper and no uniqueness claim or ansatz is imported solely from those citations. Accordingly, no circular step meets the evidenciary bar of 'Eq. X = Eq. Y by construction' or 'fitted parameter renamed as prediction.'

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central magnetic-field prediction depends on standard electromagnetism plus a set of phenomenological model parameters that were tuned to generate SDA. No new physical entities are introduced. The quantitative B values are a deterministic transform of the simulated voltage, so they inherit all model assumptions.

free parameters (5)
  • Fine-tuned four-variable model parameters (Table I) = Values in Table I (e.g., tau_v+ = 1.4506 ms, tau_s1 = 2.7342 ms, Q10,w = 2.45)
    The parameter set is described as 'opportunely fine-tuned to reproduce SDA in one-dimensional cable geometries' (Methods); these values control AP morphology, alternans onset, and node locations.
  • Temperature factors (Q10 and A/B coefficients) = Q10,v = 1.5, Q10,w = 2.45, Q10,s = 1.5; Afi = 1, Bfi = 0.065; Aso = 1, Bso = 0.008; Asi = 1, Bsi = 0.008
    Chosen to match experimental temperature dependence of APD and upstroke (refs 24, 43), not measured in this preparation.
  • Tissue conductivity sigma = sigma = D*S0*Cm, approximately 0.25 S/m from D = 0.005 cm^2/ms and myocyte geometry R = 40 um, L = 100 um
    Scales the current density and hence the magnetic field amplitude linearly; estimated from assumed myocyte geometry rather than measured directly.
  • Magnetic field evaluation distance = 50 um from the fiber center
    All |B|max values and SDA node locations are computed at this distance; the field magnitude falls off with distance and is not tested at clinically realistic standoff.
  • APD80 repolarization threshold = 80% repolarization
    Choice of repolarization level affects APD and node positions; no sensitivity analysis is provided for this threshold.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Biot-Savart law and magnetostatic approximation apply to the current distribution in the fiber
    Eq. (19) computes B from J under the slow-variation assumption; standard classical electromagnetism.
  • domain assumption Current density is proportional to the longitudinal voltage gradient (J = -sigma dVm/dz)
    Eq. (18) assumes a one-dimensional cable with a homogeneous scalar conductivity; no bidomain or anisotropic effects.
  • domain assumption Extracellular volume currents can be neglected at 50 um standoff because the action potential wavelength (10-20 cm) is much larger than 50 um
    Methods, Magnetic Field Modeling. This is the main external-validity assumption; volume-conductor cancellation is cited but not modeled.
  • domain assumption The conduction velocity is constant enough for Eq. (20) to connect B to dV/dt
    Eq. (20) assumes constant vc; during alternans and SDA, CV varies between beats, so the proportionality is approximate.
  • ad hoc to paper The four-variable model with the chosen parameters reproduces physiologically relevant alternans and SDA
    Parameters were 'fine-tuned to reproduce SDA'; no comparison to experimental AP or B data is made.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Impact of Electric Spatially Discordant Alternans on Cardiac Magnetic Field." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GZXRPQVR

@misc{pith2026250208480,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Impact of Electric Spatially Discordant Alternans on Cardiac Magnetic Field},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GZXRPQVR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.08480}
}
read the original abstract

Spatially discordant alternans (SDA) play a crucial role in cardiac arrhythmogenesis by creating steep repolarization gradients facilitating conduction block and reentry. While traditionally studied using electrical indicators, this work provides a novel perspective by characterizing SDA through their magnetic field signatures. Using a one-dimensional cardiac fiber model, we demonstrate that magnetic field measurements effectively detect SDA and temperature dependent changes in cardiac action potentials, offering a non-invasive alternative to conventional electrophysiological metrics. Our results reveal that the spatial organization of SDA is mirrored in the magnetic field distribution, with SDA nodes clearly identifiable via spatial mapping. Notably, magnetic restitution curves exhibit a distinct pattern from APD-based indicators, closely following the dynamics of the action potential upstroke. These findings establish the cardiac magnetic field as a powerful diagnostic tool for detecting SDA, opening new avenues for biomagnetic monitoring of arrhythmic risk.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.08480 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages

  1. [47]

    K. R. Swinney and J. P. Wikswo, A calculation of the magnetic field of a nerve action potential, Biophysical Journal 32, 719 (1980). 20

    work page 1980

  2. [1]

    Di Cesare, P

    M. Di Cesare, P. Perel, S. Taylor, C. Kabudula, H. Bixby, T. Gaziano, D. McGhie, J. Mwangi, B. Pervan, J. Narula, D. Pineiro, and F. Pinto, The heart of the world, Glob Heart 19, 11 (2024)

    work page 2024

  3. [2]

    Z. J. Zheng, J. B. Croft, W. H. Giles, and G. A. Mensah, Sudden cardiac death in the united states, 1989 to 1998, Circ 104, 2158 (2001)

    work page 2001

  4. [3]

    M. H. Kim, S. S. Johnston, B. C. Chu, M. R. Dalal, and K. L. Schulman, Estimation of total incremental healthcare costs in patients with atrial fibrillation in the united states, Circ: CQO 4, 313 (2011)

    work page 2011

  5. [4]

    Gizzi, E

    A. Gizzi, E. Cherry, R. Gilmour, S. Luther, S. Filippi, and F. H. Fenton, Effects of pacing site and stimulation history on alternans dynamics and the development of complex spatiotemporal patterns in cardiac tissue, Front physiol 4, 71 (2013)

    work page 2013

  6. [5]

    Ito and L

    H. Ito and L. Glass, Spiral breakup in a new model of discrete excitable media, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 671 (1991)

    work page 1991

  7. [6]

    Courtemanche, L

    M. Courtemanche, L. Glass, and J. P. Keener, Instabilities of a propagating pulse in a ring of excitable media, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 2182 (1993)

    work page 1993

  8. [7]

    H. M. Hastings, F. H. Fenton, S. J. Evans, O. Hotomaroglu, J. Geetha, K. Gittelson, J. Nilson, and A. Garfinkel, Alternans and the onset of ventricular fibrillation, Phys. Rev. E 62, 4043 (2000)

    work page 2000

Show all 48 references
  1. [8]

    K. Hall, D. J. Christini, M. Tremblay, J. J. Collins, L. Glass, and J. Billette, Dynamic control of cardiac alternans, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 4518 (1997)

    1997

  2. [9]

    G. Bub, A. Shrier, and L. Glass, Global organization of dynamics in oscillatory heterogeneous excitable media, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 028105 (2005)

    2005

  3. [10]

    Uzelac, Y

    I. Uzelac, Y. C. Ji, D. Hornung, J. Schr¨ oder-Scheteling, S. Luther, R. A. Gray, E. M. Cherry, and F. H. Fenton, Simultaneous Quantification of Spatially Discordant Alternans in Voltage 17 and Intracellular Calcium in Langendorff-Perfused Rabbit Hearts and Inconsistencies wit...

    2017

  4. [11]

    Crispino, A

    A. Crispino, A. Loppini, I. Uzelac, S. Iravanian, N. K. Bhatia, M. Burke, S. Filippi, F. H. Fenton, and A. Gizzi, A cross species thermoelectric and spatiotemporal analysis of alternans in live explanted hearts using dual voltage-calcium fluorescence optical mapping, Physiol M...

    2024

  5. [12]

    De Diego, R

    C. De Diego, R. K. Pai, A. S. Dave, A. Lynch, M. Thu, F. Chen, L.-H. Xie, J. N. Weiss, and M. Valderr´ abano, Spatially discordant alternans in cardiomyocyte monolayers, Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 294, H1417 (2008)

    2008

  6. [13]

    J. N. Weiss, A. Karma, Y. Shiferaw, P.-S. Chen, A. Garfinkel, and Z. Qu, From pulsus to pulseless: the saga of cardiac alternans, Circulation research 98, 1244 (2006)

    2006

  7. [14]

    Qu and J

    Z. Qu and J. N. Weiss, Cardiac alternans: from bedside to bench and back, Circulation research 132, 127 (2023)

    2023

  8. [15]

    Watanabe, Fenton F H, S

    M. Watanabe, Fenton F H, S. J. Evans, H. M. Hastings, and A. Karma, Mechanisms for Discordant Alternans, Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology 12, 196 (2001)

    2001

  9. [16]

    J. M. Pastore, S. D. Girouard, K. R. Laurita, F. G. Akar, and D. Rosenbaum, Mechanism linking t-wave alternans to the genesis of cardiac fibrillation, Circ. 99, 1385 (1999)

    1999

  10. [17]

    J. M. Pastore, K. R. Laurita, and D. S. Rosenbaum, Importance of spatiotemporal hetero- geneity of cellular restitution in mechanism of arrhythmogenic discordant alternans, Heart Rhythm 3, 711 (2006)

    2006

  11. [18]

    Hayashi, Y

    H. Hayashi, Y. Shiferaw, D. Sato, M. Nihei, S.-F. Lin, P.-S. Chen, A. Garfinkel, J. N. Weiss, and Z. Qu, Dynamic origin of spatially discordant alternans in cardiac tissue, Biophys J 92, 448 (2007)

    2007

  12. [19]

    M. A. Watanabe, F. H. Fenton, S. J. Evans, H. M. Hastings, and A. Karma, Mechanisms for discordant alternans, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology 12, 196 (2001)

    2001

  13. [20]

    Z. Qu, A. Garfinkel, P.-S. Chen, and J. N. Weiss, Mechanisms of discordant alternans and induction of reentry in simulated cardiac tissue, Circulation 102, 1664 (2000)

    2000

  14. [21]

    Kiyosue, M

    T. Kiyosue, M. Arita, H. Muramatsu, A. Spindler, and D. Noble, Ionic mechanisms of action potential prolongation at low temperature in guinea-pig ventricular myocytes., Physiol J 468, 85 (1993). 18

    1993

  15. [22]

    W. J. Crozier, The distribution of temperature characteristics for biological processes; critical increments for heart rates, JGP 9, 531 (1926)

    1926

  16. [23]

    V. V. Fedorov, A. V. Glukhov, S. Sudharshan, Y. Egorov, L. V. Rosenshtraukh, and I. R. Efimov, Electrophysiological mechanisms of antiarrhythmic protection during hypothermia in winter hibernating versus nonhibernating mammals, Heart Rhythm 5, 1587 (2008)

    2008

  17. [24]

    Filippi, A

    S. Filippi, A. Gizzi, C. Cherubini, S. Luther, and F. H. Fenton, Mechanistic insights into hypothermic ventricular fibrillation: the role of temperature and tissue size, EP Europace 16, 424 (2014)

    2014

  18. [25]

    Gizzi, A

    A. Gizzi, A. Loppini, E. Cherry, C. Cherubini, F. Fenton, and S. Filippi, Multi-band decom- position analysis: application to cardiac alternans as a function of temperature, Physiol Meas 38, 833–847 (2017)

    2017

  19. [26]

    Loppini, A

    A. Loppini, A. Barone, A. Gizzi, C. Cherubini, F. H. Fenton, and S. Filippi, Thermal effects on cardiac alternans onset and development: A spatiotemporal correlation analysis, PRE 103, L040201 (2021)

    2021

  20. [27]

    E. M. Moore, A. D. Nichol, S. A. Bernard, and R. Bellomo, Therapeutic hypothermia: Bene- fits, mechanisms and potential clinical applications in neurological, cardiac and kidney injury, Injury 42, 843 (2011)

    2011

  21. [28]

    Rippe, Lifestyle strategies for risk factor reduction, prevention, and treatment of cardiovas- cular disease, Am J Lifestyle Med 13, 204 (2018)

    J. Rippe, Lifestyle strategies for risk factor reduction, prevention, and treatment of cardiovas- cular disease, Am J Lifestyle Med 13, 204 (2018)

    2018

  22. [29]

    B. J. Roth and J. P. Wikswo, Electrically silent magnetic fields, Biophys J 50, 739 (1986)

    1986

  23. [30]

    B. J. Roth, W. Guo, and J. P. Wikswo, The effects of spiral anisotropy on the electric potential and the magnetic field at the apex of the heart, Math Biosci 88, 191 (1988)

    1988

  24. [31]

    Plonsey, The nature of sources of bioelectric and biomagnetic fields, Biophys J 39, 309 (1982)

    R. Plonsey, The nature of sources of bioelectric and biomagnetic fields, Biophys J 39, 309 (1982)

    1982

  25. [32]

    J. R. Holzer, L. E. Fong, V. Y. Sidorov, J. P. Wikswo, and J. F. Baudenbacher, High resolution magnetic images of planar wave fronts reveal bidomain properties of cardiac tissue, Biophys J 87, 4326 (2004)

    2004

  26. [33]

    B. J. Roth, Biomagnetism: the first sixty years, Sensors 23, 4218 (2023)

    2023

  27. [34]

    B. J. Roth, The magnetocardiogram, Biophys Rev 5 (2024)

    2024

  28. [35]

    Baudenbacher, N

    F. Baudenbacher, N. Peters, P. Baudenbacher, and J. Wikswo, High resolution imaging of biomagnetic fields generated by action currents in cardiac tissue using a lts-squid microscope, 19 Phys C Supercond Appl 368, 24 (2002)

    2002

  29. [36]

    Nakayama and T

    S. Nakayama and T. Uchiyama, Real-time measurement of biomagnetic vector fields in func- tional syncytium using amorphous metal, Scientific reports 5, 8837 (2015)

    2015

  30. [37]

    J. L. Webb, L. Troise, N. W. Hansen, C. Olsson, A. M. Wojciechowski, J. Achard, O. Brinza, R. Staacke, M. Kieschnick, J. Meijer, et al., Detection of biological signals from a live mam- malian muscle using an early stage diamond quantum sensor, Sci Rep 11, 2412 (2021)

    2021

  31. [38]

    Tanaka, N

    S. Tanaka, N. Tanaka, M. Natsume, M. Uchida, M. Oshita, Z. Aspanut, T. Eki, and S. Yoshida, Measurement of the signal from a cultured cell using a high-tc squid, Supercond Sci Tech 16, 1536 (2003)

    2003

  32. [39]

    J. F. Barry, M. J. Turner, J. M. Schloss, D. R. Glenn, Y. Song, M. D. Lukin, H. Park, and R. L. Walsworth, Optical magnetic detection of single-neuron action potentials using quantum defects in diamond, PNAS 113, 14133 (2016)

    2016

  33. [40]

    J. F. Barry, J. M. Schloss, E. Bauch, M. J. Turner, C. A. Hart, L. M. Pham, and R. L. Walsworth, Sensitivity optimization for nv-diamond magnetometry, RMP 92, 015004 (2020)

    2020

  34. [41]

    K. Arai, A. Kuwahata, D. Nishitani, I. Fujisaki, R. Matsuki, Y. Nishio, Z. Xin, X. Cao, Y. Hatano, S. Onoda, et al., Millimetre-scale magnetocardiography of living rats with thora- cotomy, Commun phys 5, 200 (2022)

    2022

  35. [42]

    Fenton and A

    F. Fenton and A. Karma, Vortex dynamics in three-dimensional continuous myocardium with fiber rotation: Filament instability and fibrillation, Chaos 8, 20 (1998)

    1998

  36. [43]

    F. H. Fenton, A. Gizzi, C. Cherubini, N. Pomella, and S. Filippi, Role of temperature on nonlinear cardiac dynamics, Phys Rev E 87, 042717 (2013)

    2013

  37. [44]

    Crispino, M

    A. Crispino, M. Nicoletti, A. Loppini, A. Gizzi, L. Chiodo, C. Cherubini, and S. Filippi, Magnetic signature of thermoelectric cardiac dynamics, Phys. Rev. E 111, L012401 (2025)

    2025

  38. [45]

    Bueno-Orovio, E

    A. Bueno-Orovio, E. M. Cherry, and F. H. Fenton, Minimal model for human ventricular action potentials in tissue, Journal of theoretical biology 253, 544 (2008)

    2008

  39. [46]

    Bueno-Orovio, E

    A. Bueno-Orovio, E. M. Cherry, S. J. Evans, and F. H. Fenton, Basis for the induction of tissue-level phase-2 reentry as a repolarization disorder in the brugada syndrome, BioMed research international 2015, 197586 (2015)

    2015

  40. [48]

    Webster and C

    G. Webster and C. I. Berul, An update on channelopathies: from mechanisms to management, circulation 127, 126 (2013). 21

    2013

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.