Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Early Galaxies from Rare Inflationary Processes and JWST Observations

T0 review · 5 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Rare inflation events could seed JWST's earliest galaxies

desk verdict A coherent, honest scenario for early galaxies from rare inflationary processes, but the JWST comparison rests on an unregulated log cusp, so treat 'can explain' as tuned rather than robust. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.08701 v1 pith:L6FRZZ5H submitted 2025-02-12 astro-ph.CO astro-ph.GAhep-ph

Soubhik Kumar , Neal Weiner This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.COastro-ph.GAhep-ph
keywords Poissonprocessesduringinflationhigh-redshiftgalaxiesJWSTinflationaryparticleproductionhalomassfunctioncuspyoverdensitiesmatterpowerspectrumcorrectionCOS-z12candidates
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that rare, Poisson-distributed events during inflation, modeled concretely as production of heavy particles whose mass depends on the inflaton, can create localized, cuspy overdensities far denser than ordinary Gaussian fluctuations. These seeds collapse into dark matter halos at redshift $z\gtrsim10$, producing galaxies far more abundant than $\Lambda$CDM predicts at those epochs, with little imprint on the matter power spectrum. If true, anomalously massive high-redshift galaxies seen by JWST could be the first direct evidence of such rare inflationary processes, rather than a sign of unusually efficient star formation or a breakdown of $\Lambda$CDM. The paper maps three process parameters (overdensity amplitude, size, and probability) onto three observable properties (halo mass, formation redshift, and rare-galaxy number density), and shows that benchmark cases place the COS-z12 candidates inside the favored region. It also argues that corrections to the power spectrum stay at or below about 10 percent, avoiding lower-redshift UV luminosity function constraints that trouble power-spectrum enhancement explanations.

What carries the argument

The central object is the cuspy, position-space overdensity left by a heavy particle produced during inflation, Eq. (9): a curvature perturbation that grows as $\ln(\eta_*/r)$ toward the seed location and vanishes beyond the comoving horizon $\eta_*$ at production. Smoothed with a top-hat window and evolved through the linear transfer function to the spherical-collapse threshold $\delta_c$, this profile converts the three model parameters $\{\Delta_{\rm PP},\eta_*,P_*\}$ into the observable triple $\{z_*,M_h,n_{\rm RG}\}$. The logarithmic profile does the load-bearing work: it makes the inner core cross $\delta_c$ at very high redshift while the outer envelope keeps the total mass modest, producing massive halos early and a gradual mass-growth curve rather than a single formation epoch.

What would settle it

Count spectroscopically confirmed, massive galaxies at $z\gtrsim12$ in the full COSMOS-Web area: if the abundance of $M_\star\gtrsim10^{10}\,M_\odot$ candidates at those redshifts is below the Poisson-process benchmark prediction, or consistent with a low star-formation efficiency interpretation, the central claim would be falsified. Alternatively, measuring the matter power spectrum at $k\simeq\pi/\eta_*\simeq1\,\mathrm{Mpc}^{-1}$ to better than 10 percent precision would directly bound the largest-$P_*$ benchmark.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that rare Poisson-distributed processes during inflation can create localized curvature perturbations whose inner density profile grows logarithmically toward the center, $\langle\zeta_p(r)\rangle = \Delta_{\rm PP}\ln(\eta_*/r)\langle\zeta_{\rm std}^2\rangle^{1/2}$ for $r\leq\eta_*$ (Eq. 9). Because the central cusp exceeds the collapse threshold $\delta_c\simeq1.686$ at small $r$, the inner region collapses into a dark matter halo at very high redshift, and the halo then grows by mergers toward the asymptotic mass $M_{h,\eta_*}=(4/3)\pi\eta_*^3\rho_{m,0}$. The paper derives an analytic growth law $M_h(z)$ (Eq. 13) and shows that with parameters chosen so that $\Delta_{\rm PP}\gtrsim1$ and $P_*\sim10^{-4}$, halos of mass $\sim10^{11}\,M_\odot$ form at $z\sim8$ to $12$, orders of magnitude more abundant than $\Lambda$CDM predicts, while the matter power spectrum is modified by at most about 10 percent. The same benchmark places the COS-z12 galaxy candidates inside the region where Poisson-process halos are expected and $\Lambda$CDM halos are not.

Load-bearing premise

The predictions depend on extrapolating the logarithmic density profile $\Delta_{\rm PP}\ln(\eta_*/r)$ to arbitrarily small $r$ with no cutoff; if any microphysical scale regulates the cusp, the early halo masses and the claimed consistency with COS-z12 candidates change.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At $z\gtrsim11$, JWST-class surveys should see rare massive galaxies in regions where $\Lambda$CDM predicts essentially zero halos; the paper identifies the window between $n_{\Lambda\mathrm{CDM}}V<1$ and $(n_{\rm PP}+n_{\Lambda\mathrm{CDM}})V>1$ as the smoking-gun region.
  • The halo mass--redshift relation flattens: halos already reach near-asymptotic masses at high $z$ and then grow gradually, unlike the steep $\Lambda$CDM growth curve.
  • Corrections to the matter power spectrum peak around $k=\pi/\eta_*$ and stay below about 10 percent for all benchmarks, so existing power-spectrum and UV luminosity function constraints at lower redshift do not rule the scenario out.
  • Wide surveys such as Euclid DAWN and deeper JWST surveys probe complementary regions of parameter space: smaller $P_*$ favors wider areas, while smaller $\Delta_{\rm PP}$ favors deeper reach.
  • The spread in formation redshift scales as $\Delta z_*/z_*\propto1/\Delta_{\rm PP}$, so precise determinations of the redshift distribution of rare galaxies would directly constrain the overdensity amplitude.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the logarithmic cusp is regularized at some radius $r_{\rm cut}$ by quantum diffusion or the particle's Compton wavelength, the predicted abundance of $z\gtrsim12$ halos would drop sharply; a dedicated simulation with a resolved inner profile could quantify this sensitivity (this is an editorial extrapolation, not a paper claim).
  • The same position-space seed mechanism, with larger $\Delta_{\rm PP}$, would produce even earlier collapse and could naturally seed supermassive black holes or primordial black holes, a connection the paper does not explore.
  • Rare-halo galaxies should be strongly biased tracers of the large-scale density field; measuring their clustering at $z\sim10$ to $14$ could distinguish the Poisson-process origin from bursty star formation or other astrophysical explanations.
  • The about-10-percent bump in the power spectrum near $k\simeq\pi/\eta_*$ could show up in future 21-cm or CMB spectral-distortion measurements even though current CMB and large-scale-structure constraints are too weak to see it.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper argues that rare Poisson processes during inflation produce localized, cuspy overdensities that collapse into dark matter halos much earlier than standard Lambda-CDM fluctuations. Focusing on a concrete model of inflationary particle production, the authors derive a map from the process parameters {Delta_PP, eta_*, P_*} to the observable properties {z_*, M_h, n_RG}, compute the resulting halo mass function and redshift spreads using CLASS and hmf, and compare with JWST COS-z12 candidates and survey volumes. They find that for benchmarks with Delta_PP of order a few and eta_* = 3 Mpc, rare halos can be orders of magnitude more abundant than Lambda-CDM at z > 10 while changing the matter power spectrum by at most about 10%, and they argue this remains consistent with lower-redshift UV luminosity function constraints.

Significance. If the calculation is robust, the paper opens a genuinely new observational channel: position-space, rare-event signatures of inflation that are nearly invisible to power-spectrum and bispectrum searches. The analytic dictionary between inflationary parameters and high-redshift galaxy observables is useful, and the paper makes concrete, falsifiable forecasts for JWST, Euclid DAWN, and Roman. The authors are appropriately careful to distinguish the PP contribution from Lambda-CDM background halos, and the use of standard numerical tools (CLASS, hmf) with analytic appendices is a strength. The central claims depend, however, on an unregulated extrapolation of the density profile and on the precise normalization of the differential halo abundance, so the significance is currently conditional.

major comments (5)
  1. [§III, Eq. (9) and §IV.A] The curvature profile <zeta_p(r)> = (g/2) ln(eta_*/r)<zeta_std^2>^{1/2} is used without a physical cutoff or a stated domain of validity, and the collapse criterion delta_R(r -> 0, z_*) = delta_c then controls the M_h(z) relation. For the Fig. 1 benchmark, z_* = 60 and z_* = 250 correspond to smoothing radii R ~ 0.025 Mpc and R ~ 6e-4 Mpc, where the logarithmic enhancement is an extrapolation of the point-particle/effective-action formula. A regulator at any of these scales, whether from a finite particle width, quantum diffusion, or breakdown of the effective description, would reduce delta_R at fixed R and delay collapse, lowering M_h at fixed z and shifting the contours in Figs. 4 and 5. Please state the domain of validity of Eq. (9) and demonstrate that the high-redshift tail and the COS-z12 placement are robust to a plausible cutoff, or identify the physical scale that removes the ambiguity.
  2. [§IV.B, Eq. (15)] As written, n_PP(M_h,z) = n_RG N(z_*, Delta z_*, z) distributes the total rare-seed abundance over redshift at fixed mass. Since M_h itself is a redshift-dependent quantity through Eq. (13), the same set of seeds appears at multiple masses in this expression, and integrating over z at fixed M_h gives n_RG for every M_h. A correct differential number density needs a Jacobian relating the formation-redshift distribution to the mass-redshift relation, together with a clear statement of whether each halo is counted once per formation event or once per epoch. Please clarify the definition and normalization of n_PP and recompute the contours in Figs. 3-5 and 9 with a properly normalized differential mass function.
  3. [§IV.A and App. A, Eq. (13)] The analytic M_h(z) relation is load-bearing for the parameter dictionary, but Appendix A states that Eq. (A10), from which Eq. (13) is derived, matches the numerical result only up to a factor of about 2, and Fig. 8 shows the analytic curves after multiplication by 2. The paper should either correct the analytic expression so that it matches the numerical pipeline to the quoted accuracy, or explain why the factor-of-two offset does not affect the z_*-M_h mapping used in Figs. 4 and 5 and in the benchmark parameters.
  4. [§IV.D and §V] The claimed consistency with lower-redshift UV luminosity functions is inferred from the small correction to the primordial power spectrum in Fig. 6 rather than computed from the halo mass function. The HST UVLF constraints of Ref. [44] are on galaxy abundances, not directly on P(k), and Fig. 9 shows that n_PP/n_LambdaCDM can still be large at z = 8-10 for a range of stellar masses. Please directly quantify the implied UVLF or galaxy abundance at z < 10 for the benchmarks, or specify the halo-to-UVLF mapping and show that the HST bounds are satisfied.
  5. [§IV.C and Fig. 5] The COS-z12 comparison is presented as a demonstration with one tuned benchmark rather than an independent test: the parameters {Delta_PP, eta_*, P_*} are chosen so that the n_PP contours enclose the three candidates, and the photometric-redshift and stellar-mass uncertainties, the survey selection function, and the baryon-to-star efficiency epsilon_* are not propagated. Please state the full parameter region consistent with the candidates rather than a single point, and show how the conclusions change when epsilon_* is varied over the 0.1-0.32 range and when the candidates' error bars are included.
minor comments (5)
  1. [General] There are several typos in the introduction, including 'ovdensitites' and 'strucutere'; a careful proofread is needed.
  2. [§IV.B] The notation N(z_*, Delta z_*, z) is not defined explicitly as a probability density in z, and the units of n_PP in Eq. (15) are therefore ambiguous; please state whether n_PP is a density per unit redshift, per unit mass, or a differential number density in (M,z).
  3. [§IV.D] Fig. 6 shows the correction to the primordial power spectrum, while the text in Section IV.D and the abstract refer to the matter power spectrum; please clarify which quantity is plotted and explain how the transfer function affects the comparison to matter-power-spectrum constraints.
  4. [App. B] Equation (B5) writes the redshift spread with a '+-' sign but the text treats the Gaussian as symmetric; please specify that the sign denotes overdensities and underdensities in the ambient field, and define Delta z_* as a 1-sigma spread.
  5. [Fig. 4] The color scale in the right panel of Fig. 4 is a ratio reaching values of order 10^2, but the color-bar labels are not self-explanatory; a logarithmic color scale with a clear label would make the survey-target regions easier to read.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

Derivation is self-contained: the mapping from {Delta_PP, eta*, P*} to {z*, M_h, n_RG} is computed, not fitted, and the COS-z12 comparison is a benchmark illustration rather than a circular prediction.

full rationale

The paper's central chain is not circular. The model parameters {Delta_PP, eta*, P*} (realized as {g, eta*, m0}) are genuine inputs; the outputs z*, M_h, n_RG are obtained by evolving the sourced curvature perturbation through the linear growth equations and applying the spherical-collapse condition delta_R(r -> 0, z*) = delta_c in Sec. IV.A. Equation (13) is a derived closed form from App. A, not a restatement of the inputs, and it explicitly depends on the physical parameters in a non-tautological way. The comparison with the COS-z12 candidates in Sec. IV.C is presented as a benchmark demonstration ('PP can potentially explain these galaxy candidates') with several alternative parameter choices in Fig. 5, rather than as a fitted prediction; the paper does not claim the data forced the parameters. The logarithmic profile (9) is imported from Ref. [9], on which Kumar is an author, but it is also cited to Maldacena [8], re-expressed in position space, and used inside an independent analytic calculation of delta(r, a) in App. A, so it is not merely an ansatz smuggled in by self-citation. The power-spectrum correction (19) is a genuine prediction from the same model and is checked against external constraints. The main caveats, such as the unregulated log cusp toward r -> 0 and the reliance on analytic spherical collapse acknowledged in Sec. V, are physical-robustness concerns rather than circularity: they affect whether the early-galaxy abundance survives small-scale regularization, but they do not make any output equal to an input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central predictions rest on a chain of standard cosmology and particle-physics ingredients (slow-roll inflation, Bogoliubov production, linear growth, spherical collapse) plus one ad hoc assumption: the cuspy profile (9) is used down to zero radius. The free parameters Delta_PP, eta*, P* (or g, eta*, m0) and epsilon* are chosen to put the predicted galaxy population in the JWST-visible range, so the numbers are illustrative benchmarks rather than externally fixed inputs. This makes the scenario a proof of existence more than a unique prediction.

free parameters (4)
  • g (or Delta_PP = g/2) = 6, 9, 3 in benchmarks; Delta_PP = 3, 4.5, 1.5
    Controls the amplitude of the rare overdensity, hence the halo formation redshift z*. Values are hand-picked to place predicted galaxies in the JWST-visible range.
  • eta* (comoving horizon at production) = 3 Mpc in all benchmarks
    Sets the asymptotic halo mass scale M_h,eta* through Eq. (3); chosen to yield roughly 10^11 to 10^12 solar mass halos relevant to JWST candidates.
  • m0/Hinf (heavy particle mass at production) = 340, 435, 448, 191 in the four benchmark points
    Exponentially controls the production probability P* via Eq. (6) and therefore the rare-galaxy number density nRG; chosen to make the contours overlap the COS-z12 data.
  • epsilon* (baryon-to-star efficiency) = 0.2
    Converts halo mass to stellar mass; not measured at high z; the paper takes a middle value between 0.1 and 0.32 from Boylan-Kolchin.
assumptions (8)
  • domain assumption Standard single-field slow-roll inflation generates Gaussian curvature fluctuations with amplitude delta_inf = H^2/(2 pi phidot) fixed by CMB observations.
    Used throughout Sec. III to set the baseline fluctuation scale; standard but not derived here.
  • domain assumption Bogoliubov particle production formula, Eq. (6), gives the number density of heavy particles produced when m_chi(phi) dips.
    Standard QFT in an expanding background, cited to Refs. [40,41].
  • domain assumption The massive-particle action Eq. (7) sources the curvature perturbation through Eq. (8), taken from prior work.
    This is the link between particle production and the overdensity profile; the derivation is cited to Refs. [8,9].
  • standard math Linear cosmological perturbation theory, Eq. (1), evolves the matter overdensity from the curvature perturbation, with transfer functions from CLASS.
    Standard Poisson equation and growth function; accurate for small fluctuations.
  • domain assumption Spherical collapse with threshold delta_c = 1.686 and a top-hat window maps a smoothed density profile to a halo mass and collapse redshift.
    Used in Sec. IV.A and App. A to define Mh(z); the paper notes an N-body simulation is a natural next step.
  • ad hoc to paper The logarithmic cusp in Eq. (9) extends to arbitrarily small r without a physical cutoff or quantum diffusion scale.
    Load-bearing for the extreme high-z collapse; no microphysical scale is given that would regulate the divergence.
  • ad hoc to paper The redshift spread of rare halos is a Gaussian with variance from the linear matter power spectrum, Eqs. (B1)-(B5).
    An approximate model for stochasticity in formation redshift; not validated against N-body or extreme-value statistics.
  • domain assumption The Lambda-CDM halo mass function uses the Sheth-Mo-Tormen fitting function, Eq. (17).
    Standard fitting function from hmf; used for the baseline comparison in Figs. 3-5 and 9.
invented entities (1)
  • Heavy scalar field chi with inflaton-dependent mass m_chi(phi)
    purpose: Provides the concrete particle-production realization of the generic Poisson process; its production creates the localized overdensity that collapses into an early galaxy.
    No direct detection channel is suggested; the observable consequences are the same high-redshift galaxies used to motivate the parameters. The 5D model in App. D is an existence proof, not an independent handle.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Early Galaxies from Rare Inflationary Processes and JWST Observations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/L6FRZZ5H

@misc{pith2026250208701,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Early Galaxies from Rare Inflationary Processes and JWST Observations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/L6FRZZ5H}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.08701}
}
abstract

Rare Poisson processes (PP) during cosmic inflation can lead to signatures that are localized in position space and are not well captured by the standard two- or higher-point correlation functions of primordial density perturbations. As an example, PP can lead to localized overdense regions that are far denser than the ones produced through standard inflationary fluctuations. As a result, such overdense regions collapse earlier than expected based on the standard $\Lambda$CDM model and would host anomalously high-redshift galaxies. We describe some general aspects of such PP and consider a particular realization in the context of inflationary particle production. We then show that the masses and redshifts of the resulting galaxies can lie in a range discoverable by the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) and future surveys, while being consistent with existing constraints on the matter power spectrum and UV luminosity functions at lower redshifts.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.08701 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Radial profiles for overdense regions sourced by the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The evolution of Mh with redshift for η∗ = 3 Mpc and varying ∆PP for the particle production model. Mass conservation forces the asymptotic masses of the halos to be similar at late times (z → 0) which is given by the enclosed mass within a radius of η∗ (horizontal line). The stars corre￾spond to the benchmark halo masses in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The effect on the halo mass function after includ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Contours of number density (in units of Mpc [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Same as the right panel of Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Ratio of the Poisson process-induced primordial [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Overdensity profiles prior to smoothing. The ana [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Comparison between analytical (dot-dashed) and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Dark Secrets of Baryons: Illuminating Dark Matter-Baryon Interactions with JWST

    hep-ph 2025-11 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    JWST ultraviolet luminosity function data currently provide the strongest upper limits on velocity-dependent (∝v^{-2}) dark matter–proton scattering for sub-GeV dark matter.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 6 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [44]

    Insights from HST into Ultramas- sive Galaxies and Early-Universe Cosmology,

    Nashwan Sabti, Julian B. Mu˜ noz, and Marc Kamionkowski, “Insights from HST into Ultramas- sive Galaxies and Early-Universe Cosmology,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 061002 (2024), arXiv:2305.07049 [astro- ph.CO]

    arXiv 2024

  2. [1]

    Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation,

    Y. Akrami et al. (Planck), “Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation,” Astron. Astrophys. 641, A10 (2020), arXiv:1807.06211 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2020

  3. [2]

    Inflation: Theory and Observa- tions,

    Ana Ach´ ucarroet al., “Inflation: Theory and Observa- tions,” (2022), arXiv:2203.08128 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2022

  4. [3]

    Minimally parametric power spectrum recon- struction from the lyman α forest: P(k) reconstruction from lyman α,

    Simeon Bird, Hiranya V. Peiris, Matteo Viel, and Li- cia Verde, “Minimally parametric power spectrum recon- struction from the lyman α forest: P(k) reconstruction from lyman α,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronom- ical Society 413, 1717–1728 (2011)

    work page 2011

  5. [4]

    Matter power spectrum: from Lyα forest to CMB scales,

    Sol` ene Chabanier, Marius Millea, and Nathalie Palanque-Delabrouille, “Matter power spectrum: from Lyα forest to CMB scales,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 489, 2247–2253 (2019), arXiv:1905.08103 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2019

  6. [5]

    Primordial Non-Gaussianities from In- flation Models,

    Xingang Chen, “Primordial Non-Gaussianities from In- flation Models,” Adv. Astron. 2010, 638979 (2010), arXiv:1002.1416 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2010

  7. [6]

    Fea- tures and New Physical Scales in Primordial Observ- ables: Theory and Observation,

    Jens Chluba, Jan Hamann, and Subodh P. Patil, “Fea- tures and New Physical Scales in Primordial Observ- ables: Theory and Observation,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 24, 1530023 (2015), arXiv:1505.01834 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2015

  8. [7]

    Cosmological Imprints of Pre-Inflationary Particles

    Anastasia Fialkov, Nissan Itzhaki, and Ely D. Kovetz, “Cosmological Imprints of Pre-Inflationary Particles,” JCAP 02, 004 (2010), arXiv:0911.2100 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2010

Show all 58 references
  1. [8]

    A model with cosmological Bell inequalities,

    Juan Maldacena, “A model with cosmological Bell inequalities,” Fortsch. Phys. 64, 10–23 (2016), arXiv:1508.01082 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Cosmological particle production and pair- wise hotspots on the CMB,

    Jeong Han Kim, Soubhik Kumar, Adam Martin, and Yuhsin Tsai, “Cosmological particle production and pair- wise hotspots on the CMB,” JHEP 11, 158 (2021), arXiv:2107.09061 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Probing cosmological particle production and pairwise hotspots with deep neural networks,

    Taegyun Kim, Jeong Han Kim, Soubhik Kumar, Adam Martin, Moritz M¨ unchmeyer, and Yuhsin Tsai, “Probing cosmological particle production and pairwise hotspots with deep neural networks,” Phys. Rev. D 108, 043525 (2023), arXiv:2303.08869 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Too Hot to Handle: Searching for Inflationary Particle Production in Planck Data,

    Oliver H. E. Philcox, Soubhik Kumar, and J. Colin Hill, “Too Hot to Handle: Searching for Inflationary Particle Production in Planck Data,” (2024), arXiv:2405.03738 [astro-ph.CO]

    2024 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Euclid preparation. The Cosmic Dawn Survey (DA WN) of the Euclid Deep and Auxiliary Fields,

    Euclid Collaboration and C. J. R. McPartland et al., “Euclid preparation. The Cosmic Dawn Survey (DA WN) of the Euclid Deep and Auxiliary Fields,” arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2408.05275 (2024), arXiv:2408.05275 [astro-ph.GA]

    2024

  6. [13]

    Wide-Field InfrarRed Survey Telescope-Astrophysics Focused Telescope Assets WFIRST-AFTA 2015 Report,

    D. Spergel et al. , “Wide-Field InfrarRed Survey Telescope-Astrophysics Focused Telescope Assets WFIRST-AFTA 2015 Report,” arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1503.03757 (2015), arXiv:1503.03757 [astro- ph.IM]

    2015 arXiv

  7. [14]

    Early Results from GLASS- JWST. III. Galaxy Candidates at z 9-15,

    Marco Castellano, Adriano Fontana, Tommaso Treu, Paola Santini, Emiliano Merlin, Nicha Leethochawalit, Michele Trenti, Eros Vanzella, Uros Mestric, Andrea Bonchi, Davide Belfiori, Mario Nonino, Diego Paris, Gi- anluca Polenta, Guido Roberts-Borsani, Kristan Boyett, Maruˇ sa Br...

    2022 arXiv

  8. [15]

    A population of red candidate massive galaxies 600 Myr after the Big Bang,

    Ivo Labb´ eet al., “A population of red candidate massive galaxies 600 Myr after the Big Bang,” Nature (London) 616, 266–269 (2023), arXiv:2207.12446 [astro-ph.GA]

    2023 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Two Remarkably Luminous Galaxy Candidates at z ≈ 10-12 Revealed by JWST,

    Rohan P. Naidu, Pascal A. Oesch, Pieter van Dokkum, Erica J. Nelson, Katherine A. Suess, Gabriel Bram- mer, Katherine E. Whitaker, Garth Illingworth, Rychard Bouwens, Sandro Tacchella, Jorryt Matthee, Natalie Allen, Rachel Bezanson, Charlie Conroy, Ivo Labbe, Joel Leja, Ecater...

    2022 arXiv

  10. [17]

    A Long Time Ago in a Galaxy Far, Far Away: A Candidate z ∼ 12 Galaxy in Early JWST CEERS Imaging,

    Steven L. Finkelstein et al., “A Long Time Ago in a Galaxy Far, Far Away: A Candidate z ∼ 12 Galaxy in Early JWST CEERS Imaging,” ApJL 940, L55 (2022), arXiv:2207.12474 [astro-ph.GA]

    2022 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Discovery and properties of ultra-high redshift galaxies (9 ¡ z ¡ 12) in the JWST ERO SMACS 0723 Field,

    N. J. Adams, C. J. Conselice, L. Ferreira, D. Austin, J. A. A. Trussler, I. Juodˇ zbalis, S. M. Wilkins, J. Caru- ana, P. Dayal, A. Verma, and A. P. Vijayan, “Discovery and properties of ultra-high redshift galaxies (9 ¡ z ¡ 12) in the JWST ERO SMACS 0723 Field,” Monthly Notic...

    2023 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Revealing galaxy candidates out to z 16 with JWST observations of the lensing cluster SMACS0723,

    Hakim Atek, Marko Shuntov, Lukas J. Furtak, Johan Richard, Jean-Paul Kneib, Guillaume Mahler, Adi Zitrin, H. J. McCracken, St´ ephane Charlot, Jacopo Chevallard, and Iryna Chemerynska, “Revealing galaxy candidates out to z 16 with JWST observations of the lensing cluster SMACS...

    2023 arXiv

  13. [20]

    COSMOS-Web: Intrinsically Luminous z ≳ 10 Galaxy Candidates Test Early Stel- lar Mass Assembly,

    Caitlin M. Casey et al., “COSMOS-Web: Intrinsically Luminous z ≳ 10 Galaxy Candidates Test Early Stel- lar Mass Assembly,” Astrophys. J. 965, 98 (2024), arXiv:2308.10932 [astro-ph.GA]

    2024 arXiv

  14. [21]

    A Com- prehensive Study of Galaxies at z 9-16 Found in the Early JWST Data: Ultraviolet Luminosity Functions and Cosmic Star Formation History at the Pre-reionization Epoch,

    Yuichi Harikane, Masami Ouchi, Masamune Oguri, Yoshiaki Ono, Kimihiko Nakajima, Yuki Isobe, Hiroya Umeda, Ken Mawatari, and Yechi Zhang, “A Com- prehensive Study of Galaxies at z 9-16 Found in the Early JWST Data: Ultraviolet Luminosity Functions and Cosmic Star Formation Hist...

    2023 arXiv

  15. [22]

    The evolution of the galaxy UV luminosity function at redshifts z 8 - 15 from deep JWST and ground-based near-infrared imaging,

    C. T. Donnan, D. J. McLeod, J. S. Dunlop, R. J. McLure, A. C. Carnall, R. Begley, F. Cullen, M. L. Hamadouche, R. A. A. Bowler, D. Magee, H. J. McCracken, B. Milvang- Jensen, A. Moneti, and T. Targett, “The evolution of the galaxy UV luminosity function at redshifts z 8 - 15 f...

    2023 arXiv

  16. [23]

    Unveiling the Distant Universe: Characterizing z ≥ 9 Galaxies in the First Epoch of COSMOS-Web,

    Maximilien Franco, Hollis B. Akins, Caitlin M. Casey, Steven L. Finkelstein, Marko Shuntov, Katherine Chworowsky, Andreas L. Faisst, Seiji Fujimoto, Olivier Ilbert, Anton M. Koekemoer, Daizhong Liu, Christo- pher C. Lovell, Claudia Maraston, Henry Joy Mc- Cracken, Jed McKinney...

    2024 arXiv

  17. [24]

    The galaxy UV luminosity function at z 11 from a suite of public JWST ERS, ERO, and Cycle-1 programs,

    D. J. McLeod, C. T. Donnan, R. J. McLure, J. S. Dunlop, D. Magee, R. Begley, A. C. Carnall, F. Cullen, R. S. Ellis, M. L. Hamadouche, and T. M. Stanton, “The galaxy UV luminosity function at z 11 from a suite of public JWST ERS, ERO, and Cycle-1 programs,” Monthly Notices of t...

    2024 arXiv

  18. [25]

    NGDEEP Epoch 1: The Faint End of the Lu- minosity Function at z 9-12 from Ultradeep JWST Imag- ing,

    Gene C. K. Leung, Micaela B. Bagley, Steven L. Finkelstein, Henry C. Ferguson, Anton M. Koekemoer, Pablo G. P´ erez-Gonz´ alez, Alexa Morales, Dale D. Ko- cevski, Guang Yang, Rachel S. Somerville, Stephen M. Wilkins, L. Y. Aaron Yung, Seiji Fujimoto, Rebecca L. Larson, Casey P...

    2023 arXiv

  19. [26]

    Pure Spectroscopic Constraints on UV Luminosity Functions and Cosmic Star Formation His- tory from 25 Galaxies at z spec = 8.61-13.20 Confirmed with JWST/NIRSpec,

    Yuichi Harikane, Kimihiko Nakajima, Masami Ouchi, Hi- roya Umeda, Yuki Isobe, Yoshiaki Ono, Yi Xu, and Yechi Zhang, “Pure Spectroscopic Constraints on UV Luminosity Functions and Cosmic Star Formation His- tory from 25 Galaxies at z spec = 8.61-13.20 Confirmed with JWST/NIRSpe...

    2024 arXiv

  20. [27]

    Stress testing ΛCDM with high-redshift galaxy candidates,

    Michael Boylan-Kolchin, “Stress testing ΛCDM with high-redshift galaxy candidates,” Nature Astron. 7, 731– 735 (2023), arXiv:2208.01611 [astro-ph.CO]

    2023 arXiv

  21. [28]

    Extreme value statistics of the halo and stellar mass distribu- tions at high redshift: are JWST results in tension with ΛCDM?

    Christopher C. Lovell, Ian Harrison, Yuichi Harikane, Sandro Tacchella, and Stephen M. Wilkins, “Extreme value statistics of the halo and stellar mass distribu- tions at high redshift: are JWST results in tension with ΛCDM?” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical So- ciety ...

    2023 arXiv

  22. [29]

    Efficient formation of massive galaxies at cosmic dawn by feedback-free star- bursts,

    Avishai Dekel, Kartick C. Sarkar, Yuval Birnboim, Nir Mandelker, and Zhaozhou Li, “Efficient formation of massive galaxies at cosmic dawn by feedback-free star- bursts,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical So- ciety 523, 3201–3218 (2023), arXiv:2303.04827 [astro- ph.GA]

    2023 arXiv

  23. [30]

    Bursty Star Formation Naturally Explains the Abundance of Bright Galaxies at Cosmic Dawn,

    Guochao Sun, Claude-Andr´ e Faucher-Gigu` ere, Christo- pher C. Hayward, Xuejian Shen, Andrew Wetzel, and Rachel K. Cochrane, “Bursty Star Formation Naturally Explains the Abundance of Bright Galaxies at Cosmic Dawn,” ApJL 955, L35 (2023), arXiv:2307.15305 [astro- ph.GA]

    2023 arXiv

  24. [31]

    The brightest galaxies at cosmic dawn,

    Charlotte A. Mason, Michele Trenti, and Tommaso Treu, “The brightest galaxies at cosmic dawn,” Monthly No- tices of the Royal Astronomical Society 521, 497–503 (2023), arXiv:2207.14808 [astro-ph.GA]

    2023 arXiv

  25. [32]

    Balancing the efficiency and stochasticity of star formation with dust extinction in z ≳ 10 galaxies observed by JWST,

    Jordan Mirocha and Steven R. Furlanetto, “Balancing the efficiency and stochasticity of star formation with dust extinction in z ≳ 10 galaxies observed by JWST,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society519, 843–853 (2023), arXiv:2208.12826 [astro-ph.GA]

    2023 arXiv

  26. [33]

    The im- pact of UV variability on the abundance of bright galax- ies at z ≥ 9,

    Xuejian Shen, Mark Vogelsberger, Michael Boylan- Kolchin, Sandro Tacchella, and Rahul Kannan, “The im- pact of UV variability on the abundance of bright galax- ies at z ≥ 9,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 525, 3254–3261 (2023), arXiv:2305.05679 [astro- ph.GA]

    2023 arXiv

  27. [34]

    Breaking degeneracies in the first galaxies with clustering,

    Julian B. Mu˜ noz, Jordan Mirocha, Steven Furlanetto, and Nashwan Sabti, “Breaking degeneracies in the first galaxies with clustering,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 526, L47–L55 (2023), arXiv:2306.09403 [astro-ph.CO]

    2023 arXiv

  28. [35]

    Scott Dodelson, Modern Cosmology (Academic Press, Amsterdam, 2003)

    2003

  29. [36]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters,

    N. Aghanim et al. (Planck), “Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters,” Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020), [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)], arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO]

    2020 arXiv

  30. [37]

    The Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System (CLASS) II: Approximation schemes,

    Diego Blas, Julien Lesgourgues, and Thomas Tram, “The Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System (CLASS) II: Approximation schemes,” JCAP 07, 034 (2011), arXiv:1104.2933 [astro-ph.CO]

    2011 arXiv

  31. [38]

    HMFcalc: An online tool for calculating dark mat- ter halo mass functions,

    Steven Murray, Chris Power, and A. S. G. Robotham, “HMFcalc: An online tool for calculating dark mat- ter halo mass functions,” Astron. Comput. 3-4, 23–34 (2013), arXiv:1306.6721 [astro-ph.CO]

    2013 arXiv

  32. [39]

    TheHaloMod: An on- line calculator for the halo model,

    Steven G. Murray, Benedikt Diemer, Zhaoting Chen, An- ton Glenn Neuhold, M. A. Schnapp, Tia Peruzzi, Daniel 14 Blevins, and Trent Engelman, “TheHaloMod: An on- line calculator for the halo model,” Astron. Comput. 36, 100487 (2021), arXiv:2009.14066 [astro-ph.CO]

    2021 arXiv

  33. [40]

    Towards the theory of reheating after infla- tion,

    Lev Kofman, Andrei D. Linde, and Alexei A. Starobin- sky, “Towards the theory of reheating after infla- tion,” Phys. Rev. D 56, 3258–3295 (1997), arXiv:hep- ph/9704452

    1997

  34. [41]

    Productive Interactions: heavy particles and non-Gaussianity,

    Raphael Flauger, Mehrdad Mirbabayi, Leonardo Sen- atore, and Eva Silverstein, “Productive Interactions: heavy particles and non-Gaussianity,” JCAP 10, 058 (2017), arXiv:1606.00513 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  35. [42]

    Non-Gaussian features of pri- mordial fluctuations in single field inflationary models,

    Juan Martin Maldacena, “Non-Gaussian features of pri- mordial fluctuations in single field inflationary models,” JHEP 05, 013 (2003), arXiv:astro-ph/0210603

    2003 arXiv

  36. [43]

    COSMOS-Webb: The Webb Cosmic Origins Survey,

    Jeyhan Kartaltepe, Caitlin M. Casey, Micaela Bagley, Angela Bongiorno, Peter Lawrence Capak, Jaclyn Cham- pagne, Kevin C. Cooke, Olivia Cooper, Behnam Darvish, Iary Davidzon, Nicole Drakos, Patrick Drew, An- dreas L. Faisst, Steven L. Finkelstein, Christopher Hayward, Shoubane...

    2021

  37. [45]

    Supermassive Dark Star candidates seen by JWST,

    Cosmin Ilie, Jillian Paulin, and Katherine Freese, “Supermassive Dark Star candidates seen by JWST,” Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 120, e2305762120 (2023), arXiv:2304.01173 [astro-ph.CO]

    2023 arXiv

  38. [46]

    High-redshift JWST Observations and Primor- dial Non-Gaussianity,

    Matteo Biagetti, Gabriele Franciolini, and Antonio Ri- otto, “High-redshift JWST Observations and Primor- dial Non-Gaussianity,” Astrophys. J. 944, 113 (2023), arXiv:2210.04812 [astro-ph.CO]

    2023 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Did JWST observe imprints of ax- ion miniclusters or primordial black holes?

    Gert H¨ utsi, Martti Raidal, Juan Urrutia, Ville Vaskonen, and Hardi Veerm¨ ae, “Did JWST observe imprints of ax- ion miniclusters or primordial black holes?” Phys. Rev. D 107, 043502 (2023), arXiv:2211.02651 [astro-ph.CO]

    2023 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Primordial power spectrum in light of JWST observations of high redshift galaxies,

    Priyank Parashari and Ranjan Laha, “Primordial power spectrum in light of JWST observations of high redshift galaxies,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 526, L63–L69 (2023), arXiv:2305.00999 [astro-ph.CO]

    2023 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Early structure formation from cosmic string loops in light of early JWST observations,

    Hao Jiao, Robert Brandenberger, and Alexandre Re- fregier, “Early structure formation from cosmic string loops in light of early JWST observations,” Phys. Rev. D 108, 043510 (2023), arXiv:2304.06429 [astro-ph.CO]

    2023 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Accelerating Early Massive Galaxy Formation with Primordial Black Holes,

    Boyuan Liu and Volker Bromm, “Accelerating Early Massive Galaxy Formation with Primordial Black Holes,” Astrophys. J. Lett. 937, L30 (2022), arXiv:2208.13178 [astro-ph.CO]

    2022 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Enhanced early galaxy formation in JWST from axion dark matter?

    Simeon Bird, Chia-Feng Chang, Yanou Cui, and Daneng Yang, “Enhanced early galaxy formation in JWST from axion dark matter?” Phys. Lett. B 858, 139062 (2024), arXiv:2307.10302 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Early galaxies and early dark energy: a unified solution to the hubble tension and puzzles of massive bright galaxies re- vealed by JWST,

    Xuejian Shen, Mark Vogelsberger, Michael Boylan- Kolchin, Sandro Tacchella, and Rohan P. Naidu, “Early galaxies and early dark energy: a unified solution to the hubble tension and puzzles of massive bright galaxies re- vealed by JWST,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 533, 3923–393...

    2024 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Compatibility of JWST results with exotic halos,

    Fabio Iocco and Luca Visinelli, “Compatibility of JWST results with exotic halos,” Phys. Dark Univ. 44, 101496 (2024), arXiv:2403.13068 [astro-ph.CO]

    2024 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Quantum contributions to cosmo- logical correlations,

    Steven Weinberg, “Quantum contributions to cosmo- logical correlations,” Phys. Rev. D 72, 043514 (2005), arXiv:hep-th/0506236

    2005 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Extra natural inflation,

    Nima Arkani-Hamed, Hsin-Chia Cheng, Paolo Crem- inelli, and Lisa Randall, “Extra natural inflation,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 221302 (2003), arXiv:hep-th/0301218

    2003 arXiv

  48. [56]

    A QCD axion from higher dimen- sional gauge field,

    Ki-woon Choi, “A QCD axion from higher dimen- sional gauge field,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 101602 (2004), arXiv:hep-ph/0308024

    2004 arXiv

  49. [57]

    TASI Lectures: (No) Global Symme- tries to Axion Physics,

    Matthew Reece, “TASI Lectures: (No) Global Symme- tries to Axion Physics,” PoS T ASI2022, 008 (2024), arXiv:2304.08512 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Higher N- point function data analysis techniques for heavy parti- cle production and WMAP results,

    Moritz M¨ unchmeyer and Kendrick M. Smith, “Higher N- point function data analysis techniques for heavy parti- cle production and WMAP results,” Phys. Rev. D 100, 123511 (2019), arXiv:1910.00596 [astro-ph.CO]

    2019 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.