REVIEW 4 cited by
Thinking beyond the anthropomorphic paradigm benefits LLM research
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Anthropomorphism, or the attribution of human traits to technology, is an automatic and unconscious response that occurs even in those with advanced technical expertise. In this position paper, we analyze hundreds of thousands of research articles to present empirical evidence of the prevalence and growth of anthropomorphic terminology in research on large language models (LLMs). We argue for challenging the deeper assumptions reflected in this terminology -- which, though often useful, may inadvertently constrain LLM development -- and broadening beyond them to open new pathways for understanding and improving LLMs. Specifically, we identify and examine five anthropomorphic assumptions that shape research across the LLM development lifecycle. For each assumption (e.g., that LLMs must use natural language for reasoning, or that they should be evaluated on benchmarks originally meant for humans), we demonstrate empirical, non-anthropomorphic alternatives that remain under-explored yet offer promising directions for LLM research and development.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Complacent, Not Sycophantic: Reframing Large Language Models and Designing AI Literacy for Complacent Machines
LLMs are complacent rather than sycophantic because they lack motives or intent; AI literacy should therefore focus on countering users' confirmation bias.
-
Human Cognition in Machines: A Unified Perspective of World Models
The paper introduces a unified framework for world models that fully incorporates all cognitive functions from Cognitive Architecture Theory, highlights under-researched areas in motivation and meta-cognition, and pro...
-
Re:Form -- Reducing Human Annotations in Scalable Formal Software Verification with RL in LLMs: A Preliminary Study on Dafny
A minimal-prior pipeline with automated data curation and verifier-driven RL lets small LLMs generate verifiable Dafny specifications and beat larger proprietary models on a synthetic compositional benchmark.
-
A validity-guided workflow for robust large language model research in psychology
A six-stage workflow scales validity requirements to research ambition so that LLM-based psychological claims rest on demonstrated measurement quality rather than prompt artifacts.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.