Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 76 references

Superconducting diode efficiency from singlet-triplet mixing in disordered systems

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Disorder controls sign and existence of the superconducting diode effect.

desk verdict A serious microscopic derivation of disorder effects on the superconducting diode, but the headline strong-SOC claim inherits a clean-limit cancellation that the paper does not verify in its own formalism. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.09421 v2 pith:H5WTNIBM submitted 2025-02-13 cond-mat.supr-con

Jaglul Hasan , Daniel Shaffer , Maxim Khodas , Alex Levchenko This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.supr-con
keywords superconductingdiodeeffectnonreciprocaltransportRashbaspin-orbitcouplingdisordersinglet-tripletmixingGinzburg-Landautheoryself-consistentBornapproximation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Disorder is usually treated as a benign dampener of superconducting effects, but this paper argues it is an active player in the superconducting diode effect. Working in a two-dimensional Rashba superconductor under an in-plane magnetic field, the authors derive a Ginzburg-Landau theory with disorder and find two surprises: at weak spin-orbit coupling, strong disorder reverses the sign of the diode efficiency; at strong spin-orbit coupling, where the clean system has no diode effect due to an accidental symmetry, disorder produces a finite effect. The mechanism is disorder-induced mixing of singlet and triplet superconducting order parameters. If correct, this means any quantitative or even qualitative match between clean-limit theory and experiment in noncentrosymmetric superconductors is incomplete without accounting for disorder.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Ginzburg-Landau free energy expanded to fourth order in the superconducting order parameter and to fourth order in the Cooper pair momentum $q$, with coefficients $\alpha_n(q)$ and $\beta_n(q)$ that encode the diode effect via Eq. (23b). The calculation uses a self-consistent Born approximation for impurity scattering, which dresses Green functions and, crucially, generates impurity ladders that are not diagonal in the helicity basis of the Rashba bands. This ladder is the mechanism: it couples the two helicity bands, leading to disorder-induced mixing of singlet ($s$-wave) and triplet pairing components. In the strong SOC limit, the single-particle self-energy preserves the accidental symmetry, but the vertex correction from the ladder violates it, which is why disorder alone can produce a nonzero diode efficiency.

What would settle it

Compute the clean-limit diode efficiency to second order in the magnetic field in the strong spin-orbit regime; if $\eta$ becomes nonzero at $h^2$ with a magnitude comparable to the disorder-induced term, the paper's attribution of the effect to disorder fails. Experimentally, a clean, strong-SOC Rashba superconductor with negligible disorder showing a measurable diode effect would contradict the assumed clean-limit vanishing.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the diode efficiency $\eta$ in a disordered Rashba superconductor is governed by disorder in two distinct ways. In the weak spin-orbit (SOC) regime, $\eta$ changes sign as disorder grows: the clean-limit value is positive (Eq. (26)), while in the diffusive limit $\eta \approx -0.307 (T_c\tau)^{3/2} \frac{h}{T_c} \frac{\alpha_R}{v_F} \left(\frac{\alpha_R p_F}{T_c}\right)^2 \sqrt{t}$ (Eq. (27)), so strong disorder reverses the direction of the diode. In the strong SOC limit, $\eta$ vanishes in the clean system because the Ginzburg-Landau coefficients obey an accidental proportionality, with $\alpha_{2n-1}/\alpha_{2n}$ and $\beta_{2n-1}/\beta_{2n}$ proportional to $n$ to linear order in field; impurity vertex corrections break this symmetry by coupling the two helicity bands, producing a disorder-induced singlet-triplet mixing that makes $\eta$ nonzero (Eqs. (28)-(30)). The paper establishes that this disorder channel is a genuine microscopic source of nonreciprocal superconducting transport.

Load-bearing premise

The strong-spin-orbit result depends on the accidental symmetry of the clean system being exact to linear order in field, so the only remaining source of the diode effect at that order is the disorder-induced vertex correction.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The diode efficiency is nonmonotonic in both disorder and spin-orbit coupling, giving a concrete signature that distinguishes disorder-driven from intrinsic effects.
  • In the weak-SOC regime, a sign change of $\eta$ with disorder strength could explain sign-changing diode observations without invoking a phase transition between helical phases.
  • In the strong-SOC regime, the presence of a diode effect does not by itself prove the clean system is nonreciprocal; disorder can be the sole source.
  • The analytical asymptotes in the diffusive limit, $\eta \propto (T_c\tau)^{3/2}$ with either negative (weak SOC) or logarithmic-correction (strong SOC) prefactors, provide quantitative predictions for experiments.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The singlet-triplet mixing mechanism is probably generic: any impurity vertex that couples the two helicity bands, including magnetic or spin-orbit impurity scattering, should generate a diode effect in strong-SOC superconductors.
  • The sign reversal in the weak-SOC regime could be used as a disorder probe: tuning impurity concentration in a single sample should sweep $\eta$ from positive to negative through a predicted zero crossing, pinning the elastic scattering time.
  • The framework suggests that sample-to-sample variations in measured diode efficiencies in strong-SOC materials may reflect uncontrolled disorder rather than intrinsic electronic structure.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a microscopic Ginzburg-Landau theory for a disordered two-dimensional Rashba superconductor in an in-plane Zeeman field, using the self-consistent Born approximation and a diagrammatic expansion in the Cooper-pair momentum. The authors compute the GL coefficients α_n and β_n and use them to evaluate the superconducting diode efficiency η. They report two main results: for weak Rashba spin-orbit coupling, increasing disorder reverses the sign of η (Eqs. (25)-(27)); for strong Rashba spin-orbit coupling, η vanishes in the clean limit due to an accidental approximate symmetry and is generated by disorder through singlet-triplet mixing (Eqs. (28)-(30), Sec. IV B). The manuscript provides asymptotic analytic expressions for η in the clean and diffusive limits and supports the mechanism by an intraband helical-basis calculation.

Significance. If correct, this is an important conceptual advance: disorder, usually treated as a pair-breaking suppression, becomes an active ingredient that can reverse or create the superconducting diode effect. The use of a microscopic Hamiltonian rather than a fitting model gives the predictions genuine falsifiability; the closed-form limits (Eqs. (26)-(27) and (29)-(30)) are concrete and testable. The strong-SOC result is particularly nontrivial because it relies on a subtle cancellation in the clean limit that disorder lifts. The paper introduces no free parameters beyond the microscopic model constants, and the asymptotic regimes are stated explicitly. However, the evidence is currently conditional: the full diagram catalog is deferred to a supplementary file, and the clean-limit cancellation is imported from earlier work rather than rederived for the present calculation.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. III, Eqs. (21)-(22)] The central coefficients α3 and β1, which enter the diode efficiency in Eq. (23b), are stated as results of a diagram catalog that is only referenced as the supplemental file [70]. The main text evaluates in detail only the α1 diagrams (Appendices A and B). Consequently, the key expressions (21d) and (22b) cannot be checked from the present manuscript. Please include the complete diagram-by-diagram evaluation for α3 and β1 in the main text or appendices, or provide the supplementary file as an integral, accessible part of the submission with the full catalog.
  2. [Sec. IV B, Eqs. (28)-(30) and (C5a)-(C5c)] The claim that η vanishes in the clean limit rests on the accidental symmetry of Refs. [46,50,71] quoted in Eqs. (31)-(32), but the coefficients derived here are not shown to satisfy this symmetry. In particular, the strong-SOC expressions (C5a)-(C5c) are not manifestly zero as τ→∞; the cancellation requires a nontrivial asymptotic expansion that is not displayed. Please provide an explicit verification that the combination 2α2α3β0 - 4α1α4β0 - α2^2β1 + α1α2β2 in Eq. (23b) vanishes in the τ→∞ limit within the present formalism, so that the disorder-induced contribution is indeed the sole source of η.
  3. [Sec. IV B and Appendix D] The explanatory intraband calculation demonstrates the violation of the symmetry only for α(q) (Eqs. (33) and (D11)). However, the vanishing condition in Eq. (23b) involves both α and β ratios (Eqs. (31)-(32)); a symmetry-breaking α alone does not guarantee a nonzero η unless the corresponding β(q) also breaks the ratio condition. The paper should compute β(q) in the same intraband scheme, or otherwise show explicitly that the disorder vertex correction makes the full combination Eq. (23b) nonzero.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Eq. (4)] The parameter κ is defined twice in Eq. (4), first as αRpF/T and then as 2αRpFτ; please rename the second one, for example κτ, to avoid ambiguity throughout the paper.
  2. [Sec. IV A] The sign-change threshold is reported inconsistently: the text around Eq. (25) says the sign changes around 1/(Tcτ) ∼ 15, while the text after Fig. 6 gives Tcτ ≃ 0.018 (which corresponds to 1/(Tcτ) ≈ 56). Please reconcile these statements.
  3. [Eq. (24)] There is a typo in Eq. (24): "He we introduced" should read "Here we introduced".
  4. [Eq. (20d)] In Eq. (20d), the argument of v is written as "wn" instead of ωn; please correct the notation.
  5. [Reference [70]] Reference [70] is listed as "PDF File of Supplementary Materials"; this is not citable or accessible. Please provide an arXiv identifier, a DOI, or include the supplementary material with the submission.
  6. [Fig. 7] The caption of Fig. 7 should explicitly state which panel shows Υ versus 1/(Tcτ) and which shows Ξ versus 1/(Tcτ), and clarify the normalization used for the vertical axis.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the GL coefficients are computed from the microscopic Hamiltonian, and the few self-cited inputs are parameter-free algebraic or symmetry results that do not encode the paper's conclusions.

full rationale

The derivation chain starts from the single-particle Hamiltonian (1) and the s-wave pairing interaction (11), and the GL coefficients α0...β2 in Eqs. (21)-(22) are obtained by a self-consistent Born-approximation diagrammatic expansion rather than by fitting to any target value of η. Eq. (23) is imported from Ref. [50] only as an algebraic mapping from GL coefficients to critical currents and η; it is a general identity, not a fitted result, and although its authors overlap with the present paper, it is parameter-free and does not contain the disorder-induced SDE as an input. Similarly, the clean-limit vanishing of η in the strong-SOC regime is taken from Refs. [46,50,71]; Ref. [46] is external, and Refs. [50,71] are parameter-free prior calculations of the same accidental linear-in-h symmetry, not derivations that assume the present conclusion. The paper then computes disorder corrections explicitly in Eqs. (C5a)-(C5c) and, in Appendix D, shows that the vertex-correction term breaks the α(q) ratio condition, which is a genuine microscopic computation. The fact that the paper does not display the τ→∞ cancellation of its own strong-SOC expressions is a verification gap and a possible correctness risk, not a circular reduction: no quantity in the final η is defined in terms of η itself or obtained by renaming a fitted parameter. Accordingly, no circular step can be exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No constants are fitted to data; the model inputs (m, mu, alpha_R, tau, h, lambda_s) are physical parameters kept symbolic. The calculation uses a self-consistent Born approximation, s-wave pairing, linear-in-field and linear-in-delta expansions, and the published critical-current formula Eq. (23). No new particles, fields, or conserved quantities are introduced; the disorder-induced triplet component is a pairing-amplitude admixture in an existing Hilbert space.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The electronic system is a 2D single-band Rashba metal with short-range scalar impurity disorder, treated by disorder-averaged self-consistent Born approximation with non-crossing impurity ladders.
    Eqs. (1)-(3) and the impurity ladder in Fig. 4 define the model; the central derivation depends on this description of disorder.
  • domain assumption The Zeeman field h and Rashba coupling delta = alpha_R/v_F are treated to linear order, and the GL expansion near Tc keeps terms up to fourth order in the order parameter and second order in Cooper pair momentum.
    Section II A and Eq. (18); the asymptotic formulas for eta rely on these truncations.
  • domain assumption Superconducting pairing is s-wave singlet only, with the pairing constant lambda_s setting Tc; no triplet pairing interaction is introduced.
    The pairing Hamiltonian in Eq. (11) is purely singlet; the disorder-induced triplet amplitude arises from band mixing in the helical basis, not from a triplet interaction.
  • standard math The relation between GL coefficients and critical currents in Eq. (23), taken from Ref. [50], is correct.
    Used without rederivation as a published formula from the same group; it converts the computed alpha and beta coefficients into the diode efficiency.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Superconducting diode efficiency from singlet-triplet mixing in disordered systems." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/H5WTNIBM

@misc{pith2026250209421,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Superconducting diode efficiency from singlet-triplet mixing in disordered systems},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/H5WTNIBM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.09421}
}
read the original abstract

The superconducting diode effect (SDE) -- the nonreciprocity of the critical current in a bulk superconductor -- has garnered significant attention due to its potential applications in superconducting electronics. However, the role of disorder scattering in SDE has rarely been considered, despite its potential qualitative impact, as we demonstrate in this work. We investigate SDE in a disordered Rashba superconductor under an in-plane magnetic field, employing a self-consistent Born approximation to derive the corresponding Ginzburg-Landau theory. Our analysis reveals two surprising effects. First, in the weak Rashba spin-orbit coupling (SOC) regime, disorder can reverse the direction of the diode effect, indicated by a sign change in the superconducting diode efficiency coefficient. Second, in the strong Rashba SOC regime, disorder becomes the driving mechanism of SDE, which vanishes in its absence. In this case, we show that disorder-induced mixing of singlet and triplet superconducting orders underlies the effect.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.09421 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. The mean-field loop diagrams for the GL functional [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Unlike Fig. 1, thin solid lines in Fig. 2 corre [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Diagram expansion of the Green’s function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The impurity ladder represented by a thick dashed line. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. The equation for the impurity-renormalized order pa [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Normalized diode efficiency coefficient in the unit of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Plots for the dimensionless functions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Dependence of the critical currents on the strength of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. One of the skeleton diagrams responsible for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_9.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

76 extracted references · 67 canonical work pages

  1. [70]

    Properties of a 2D elec- tron gas with lifted spectral degeneracy,

    Yu. A. Bychkov and E. I. Rashba, “Properties of a 2D elec- tron gas with lifted spectral degeneracy,” Sov. Phys. JETP Lett. 39, 78 (1984)

    work page 1984

  2. [1]

    The superconducting diode effect,

    Muhammad Nadeem, Michael S. Fuhrer, and Xiaolin Wang, “The superconducting diode effect,” Nature Re- views Physics5, 558–577 (2023)

    work page 2023

  3. [2]

    The inset shows the difference |Jc+| − |Jc−| plotted versus 1 Tcτ in the unit ofhαRt2. 7 B. Intraband Limit in Helical Basis As has been shown in [46], in the clean case the SDE vanishes in the limit of strong Rashba SOC. This occurs due to an approximate symmetry that holds to linear order inh in this case [50]. A surprising result that fol- lows from Eq...

    work page

  4. [3]

    Zero- fieldsuperconductingdiodeeffectinsmall-twist-angletri- layer graphene,

    Jiang-Xiazi Lin, Phum Siriviboon, Harley D. Scammell, Song Liu, Daniel Rhodes, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, James Hone, Mathias S. Scheurer, and J. I. A. Li, “Zero- fieldsuperconductingdiodeeffectinsmall-twist-angletri- layer graphene,” Nature Physics , 1–7 (2022), publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    work page 2022

  5. [4]

    Observation of su- perconducting diode effect,

    Fuyuki Ando, Yuta Miyasaka, Tian Li, Jun Ishizuka, Tomonori Arakawa, Yoichi Shiota, Takahiro Moriyama, Youichi Yanase, and Teruo Ono, “Observation of su- perconducting diode effect,” Nature584, 373–376 (2020), number: 7821 Publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    work page 2020

  6. [5]

    Ubiquitoussuperconductingdiode effect in superconductor thin films,

    Yasen Hou, Fabrizio Nichele, Hang Chi, Alessandro Lodesani, Yingying Wu, Markus F. Ritter, Daniel Z. Haxell, Margarita Davydova, Stefan Ilić, Ourania Glezakou-Elbert, Amith Varambally, F. Sebastian Berg- eret, AkashdeepKamra, LiangFu,PatrickA.Lee, andJa- gadeeshS.Moodera,“Ubiquitoussuperconductingdiode effect in superconductor thin films,” (2023)

    work page 2023

  7. [6]

    Su- percurrent diode effect and magnetochiral anisotropy in few-layer NbSe2,

    Lorenz Bauriedl, Christian Bäuml, Lorenz Fuchs, Chris- tian Baumgartner, Nicolas Paulik, Jonas M. Bauer, Kai- Qiang Lin, John M. Lupton, Takashi Taniguchi, Kenji Watanabe, Christoph Strunk, and Nicola Paradiso, “Su- percurrent diode effect and magnetochiral anisotropy in few-layer NbSe2,” Nature Communications 13, 4266 (2022), number: 1 Publisher: Nature ...

    work page 2022

  8. [7]

    Superconductor-ferromagnet hybrids for non-reciprocal electronics and detectors

    Zhuoran Geng, Alberto Hijano, Stefan Ilic, Maxim Ilyn, Ilari J. Maasilta, Alessandro Monfardini, Maria Spies, Elia Strambini, Pauli Virtanen, Martino Calvo, Carmen Gonzalez-Orellana, Ari P. Helenius, Sara Khorshidian, Clodoaldo I. L. de Araujo, Florence Levy-Bertrand, Celia Rogero, Francesco Giazotto, F. Sebastián Bergeret, and Tero T. Heikkilä, “Supercond...

    work page Pith review arXiv 2023

Show all 76 references
  1. [8]

    Anomalous supercon- ducting diode effect in a polar superconductor,

    Robert Kealhofer, Hanbyeol Jeong, Arman Rashidi, Leon Balents, and Susanne Stemmer, “Anomalous supercon- ducting diode effect in a polar superconductor,” Physical Review B107, L100504 (2023), publisher: American Phys- ical Society

    2023

  2. [9]

    Superconducting diode ef- fect and interference patterns in kagome CsV3Sb5,

    TianLe,ZhimingPan,ZhuokaiXu,JinjinLiu,JialuWang, 13 Zhefeng Lou, Xiaohui Yang, Zhiwei Wang, Yugui Yao, Congjun Wu, and Xiao Lin, “Superconducting diode ef- fect and interference patterns in kagome CsV3Sb5,” Na- ture , 1–6 (2024), publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    2024

  3. [10]

    Magnetic proximity-induced superconduct- ing diode effect and infinite magnetoresistance in a van der Waals heterostructure,

    JonginnYun,SuhanSon,JeacheolShin,GiungPark,Kaix- uan Zhang, Young Jae Shin, Je-Geun Park, and Do- hun Kim, “Magnetic proximity-induced superconduct- ing diode effect and infinite magnetoresistance in a van der Waals heterostructure,” Physical Review Research5, L022064 (2023), ...

    2023

  4. [11]

    Angle-resolved transport non-reciprocity and spontaneous symmetry breaking in twisted trilayer graphene,

    Naiyuan James Zhang, Jiang-Xiazi Lin, Dmitry V. Chichi- nadze, Yibang Wang, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Liang Fu, and J. I. A. Li, “Angle-resolved transport non-reciprocity and spontaneous symmetry breaking in twisted trilayer graphene,” Nature Materials23, 356–362 (2024)

    2024

  5. [12]

    Evidence for a finite-momentum Cooper pair in tricolor d-wave super- conducting superlattices,

    T. Asaba, M. Naritsuka, H. Asaeda, Y. Kosuge, S. Ike- mori, S. Suetsugu, Y. Kasahara, Y. Kohsaka, T. Terashima, A. Daido, Y. Yanase, and Y. Matsuda, “Evidence for a finite-momentum Cooper pair in tricolor d-wave super- conducting superlattices,” Nature Communications 15, 3861 ...

    2024

  6. [13]

    Un- conventional superconductivity in chiral molecule‚ TaS2 hybrid superlattices,

    Zhong Wan, Gang Qiu, Huaying Ren, Qi Qian, Yaochen Li, Dong Xu, Jingyuan Zhou, Jingxuan Zhou, Boxuan Zhou, Laiyuan Wang, Ting-Hsun Yang, Zdenƒõk Sofer, Yu Huang, Kang L. Wang, and Xiangfeng Duan, “Un- conventional superconductivity in chiral molecule‚ TaS2 hybrid superlattices...

    2024

  7. [14]

    Superconductingdiodeeffectundertime-reversal symmetry,

    Fengshuo Liu, Yuki M. Itahashi, Shunta Aoki, Yu Dong, ZiqianWang,NaokiOgawa,ToshiyaIdeue, andYoshihiro Iwasa,“Superconductingdiodeeffectundertime-reversal symmetry,” Science Advances10, eado1502 (2024), pub- lisher: AmericanAssociationfortheAdvancementofSci- ence

    2024

  8. [15]

    Nonreciprocal charge trans- port in noncentrosymmetric superconductors,

    Ryohei Wakatsuki, Yu Saito, Shintaro Hoshino, Yuki M. Itahashi, Toshiya Ideue, Motohiko Ezawa, Yoshihiro Iwasa, and Naoto Nagaosa, “Nonreciprocal charge trans- port in noncentrosymmetric superconductors,” Science Advances 3, e1602390 (2017), publisher: American As- sociation f...

    2017

  9. [16]

    Highly Efficient Superconducting Diodes and Rectifiers for Quantum Circuitry,

    Josep Ingla-Aynes, Yasen Hou, Sarah Wang, En-De Chu, OlegA.Mukhanov,PengWei, andJagadeeshS.Moodera, “Highly Efficient Superconducting Diodes and Rectifiers for Quantum Circuitry,” (2024), arXiv:2406.12012 [cond- mat]

    2024 arXiv

  10. [17]

    Topologicalreciprocityin3Dsuperconduct- ing diodes,

    PhilipMoll,“Topologicalreciprocityin3Dsuperconduct- ing diodes,” (2024), iSSN: 2693-5015

    2024

  11. [18]

    Superconducting diode effect sign change in epitaxial Al-InAs Josephson junctions,

    Neda Lotfizadeh, William F. Schiela, Baris Pekerten, Peng Yu, Bassel Heiba Elfeky, William M. Strickland, Alex Matos-Abiague, and Javad Shabani, “Superconducting diode effect sign change in epitaxial Al-InAs Josephson junctions,” Communications Physics7, 1–8 (2024), pub- lishe...

    2024

  12. [19]

    Josephsonϕ0- junction in nanowire quantum dots,

    D. B. Szombati, S. Nadj-Perge, D. Car, S. R. Plissard, E. P. a. M. Bakkers, and L. P. Kouwenhoven, “Josephsonϕ0- junction in nanowire quantum dots,” Nature Physics12, 568–572 (2016), number: 6 Publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    2016

  13. [20]

    Supercurrentrec- tification with time-reversal symmetry broken multiband superconductors,

    Yuriy Yerin, Stefan-Ludwig Drechsler, A. A. Varlamov, MarioCuoco, andFrancescoGiazotto,“Supercurrentrec- tification with time-reversal symmetry broken multiband superconductors,” Physical Review B110, 054501 (2024), publisher: American Physical Society

    2024

  14. [21]

    Magnetochiral vortex ratchet ef- fectintwo-dimensionalarraysof φ0-Josephsonjunctions,

    Simon Reinhardt, Alexander-Georg Penner, Johanna Berger, Christian Baumgartner, Sergei Gronin, Geof- frey C. Gardner, Tyler Lindemann, Michael J. Manfra, Leonid I. Glazman, Felix von Oppen, Nicola Paradiso, and Christoph Strunk, “Magnetochiral vortex ratchet ef- fectintwo-dime...

    2024

  15. [22]

    Supercurrentrectificationandmagne- tochiraleffectsinsymmetricJosephsonjunctions,

    Christian Baumgartner, Lorenz Fuchs, Andreas Costa, Simon Reinhardt, Sergei Gronin, Geoffrey C. Gardner, Tyler Lindemann, Michael J. Manfra, Paulo E. Faria Ju- nior,DenisKochan,JaroslavFabian,NicolaParadiso, and ChristophStrunk,“Supercurrentrectificationandmagne- tochiraleffec...

    2022

  16. [23]

    Vortex ratchet induced by controlled edge roughness,

    D. Cerbu, V. N. Gladilin, J. Cuppens, J. Fritzsche, J. Tem- pere,J.T.Devreese,V.V.Moshchalkov,A.V.Silhanek, and J. Van de Vondel, “Vortex ratchet induced by controlled edge roughness,” New Journal of Physics 15, 063022 (2013), publisher: IOP Publishing

    2013

  17. [24]

    Asymmetries of the Criti- calSurfaceCurrentinType-IISuperconductors,

    P. S. Swartz and H. R. Hart, “Asymmetries of the Criti- calSurfaceCurrentinType-IISuperconductors,”Physical Review156,412–420(1967),publisher: AmericanPhysical Society

    1967

  18. [25]

    Mag- netostatics of superconductors without an inversion cen- ter,

    L.S.Levitov,Yu.V.Nazarov, andG.M.Eliashberg,“Mag- netostatics of superconductors without an inversion cen- ter,” JETP Letters41, 445–447 (1985)

    1985

  19. [26]

    Direct observation of a superconducting vortex diode,

    Alon Gutfreund, Hisakazu Matsuki, Vadim Plastovets, Avia Noah, Laura Gorzawski, Nofar Fridman, Guang Yang, Alexander Buzdin, Oded Millo, Jason W. A. Robin- son, and Yonathan Anahory, “Direct observation of a superconducting vortex diode,” Nature Communications 14, 1630 (2023),...

    2023

  20. [27]

    TheGinzburg-Landauequationfor superconductors of polar symmetry,

    VictorM.Edelstein,“TheGinzburg-Landauequationfor superconductors of polar symmetry,” Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter8, 339 (1996)

    1996

  21. [28]

    TheJosephsoneffect in superconductors with heavy fermions,

    V.B.GeshkenbelhandA.I>Larkin,“TheJosephsoneffect in superconductors with heavy fermions,” JETP Lett.43 (1986)

    1986

  22. [29]

    Helical vor- texphaseinthenoncentrosymmetricCePt 3Si,

    R. P. Kaur, D. F. Agterberg, and M. Sigrist, “Helical vor- texphaseinthenoncentrosymmetricCePt 3Si,”Phys.Rev. Lett.94, 137002 (2005)

    2005

  23. [30]

    Time-Reversal Symmetry Breaking States in High-Temperature Superconductors,

    Manfred Sigrist, “Time-Reversal Symmetry Breaking States in High-Temperature Superconductors,” Progress of Theoretical Physics99, 899–929 (1998)

    1998

  24. [31]

    Proximity effects in superconductor- ferromagnet heterostructures,

    A. I. Buzdin, “Proximity effects in superconductor- ferromagnet heterostructures,” Reviews of Modern Physics77, 935–976 (2005), publisher: American Physical Society

    2005

  25. [32]

    Superconductingrecti- fierbasedontheasymmetricsurfacebarriereffect,

    D.Y.VodolazovandF.M.Peeters,“Superconductingrecti- fierbasedontheasymmetricsurfacebarriereffect,”Physi- calReviewB 72,172508(2005),publisher: AmericanPhys- ical Society

    2005

  26. [33]

    Anomalous Josephson Current in Junctions with Spin Polarizing Quantum Point Con- tacts,

    A. A. Reynoso, Gonzalo Usaj, C. A. Balseiro, D. Fein- berg, and M. Avignon, “Anomalous Josephson Current in Junctions with Spin Polarizing Quantum Point Con- tacts,” Physical Review Letters101, 107001 (2008), pub- lisher: American Physical Society

    2008

  27. [34]

    Proposed De- sign of a Josephson Diode,

    Jiangping Hu, Congjun Wu, and Xi Dai, “Proposed De- sign of a Josephson Diode,” Physical Review Letters99, 067004 (2007), publisher: American Physical Society

    2007

  28. [35]

    Universal Josephson diode effect,

    MargaritaDavydova, SaraneshPrembabu, andLiangFu, “Universal Josephson diode effect,” Science Advances8, eabo0309 (2022), publisher: American Association for the Advancement of Science

    2022

  29. [36]

    Magnetoelectric effects, helical phases, and FFLO phases in superconductors without inversion symmetry,

    D. F. Agterberg, “Magnetoelectric effects, helical phases, and FFLO phases in superconductors without inversion symmetry,” (2011), arXiv:1106.0352 [cond-mat.supr-con]

    2011 arXiv

  30. [37]

    General Theory of Josephson Diodes,

    Yi Zhang, Yuhao Gu, Pengfei Li, Jiangping Hu, and Kun Jiang, “General Theory of Josephson Diodes,” Physical ReviewX 12,041013(2022),publisher: AmericanPhysical Society

    2022

  31. [38]

    Non- 14 reciprocal superconductivity,

    Margarita Davydova, Max Geier, and Liang Fu, “Non- 14 reciprocal superconductivity,” (2024), arXiv:2407.01681 [cond-mat]

    2024 arXiv

  32. [39]

    Phenomenological Theory of the Su- percurrent Diode Effect: The Lifshitz Invariant,

    Denis Kochan, Andreas Costa, Iaroslav Zhumagulov, and Igor Žutić, “Phenomenological Theory of the Su- percurrent Diode Effect: The Lifshitz Invariant,” (2023), arXiv:2303.11975 [cond-mat]

    2023 arXiv

  33. [40]

    Giant nonreciprocity of current-voltage charac- teristics of noncentrosymmetric superconductor–normal metal–superconductor junctions,

    T. Liu, M. Smith, A. V. Andreev, and B. Z. Spi- vak, “Giant nonreciprocity of current-voltage charac- teristics of noncentrosymmetric superconductor–normal metal–superconductor junctions,” Physical Review B109, L020501 (2024), publisher: American Physical Society

    2024

  34. [41]

    Beyond the standard model of topological Josephson junctions: From crys- talline anisotropy to finite-size and diode effects,

    B Pekerten, David Brandlo, Bailey Bussiere, David Mon- roe, Tong Zhou, Jong E. Han, Javad Shabani, Alex Matos-Abiague, and Igor Zutic, “Beyond the standard model of topological Josephson junctions: From crys- talline anisotropy to finite-size and diode effects,” (2024)

    2024

  35. [42]

    Phase jumps in Josephson junctions with time-dependent spin-orbit coupling,

    David Monroe, Chenghao Shen, Dario Tringali, Moham- mad Alidoust, Tong Zhou, and Igor Zutic, “Phase jumps in Josephson junctions with time-dependent spin-orbit coupling,” Applied Physics Letters 125, 012601 (2024), arXiv:2407.01847 [cond-mat]

    2024 arXiv

  36. [43]

    Intrinsic Superconducting Diode Effect,

    Akito Daido, Yuhei Ikeda, and Youichi Yanase, “Intrinsic Superconducting Diode Effect,” Physical Review Letters 128, 037001 (2022), publisher: American Physical Society

    2022

  37. [44]

    Nonlinear diode effect and Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless transition in purely two-dimensional noncentrosymmetric supercon- ductors,

    Naratip Nunchot and Youichi Yanase, “Nonlinear diode effect and Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless transition in purely two-dimensional noncentrosymmetric supercon- ductors,” (2024), arXiv:2409.16930 [cond-mat]

    2024 arXiv

  38. [45]

    Aphe- nomenological theory of superconductor diodes,

    JamesJunHe,YukioTanaka, andNaotoNagaosa,“Aphe- nomenological theory of superconductor diodes,” New Journal of Physics24, 053014 (2022)

    2022

  39. [46]

    Supercurrentdiodeeffect and finite-momentum superconductors,

    NoahF.Q.YuanandLiangFu,“Supercurrentdiodeeffect and finite-momentum superconductors,” Proceedings of theNationalAcademyofSciences 119,e2119548119(2022), publisher: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sci- ences

    2022

  40. [47]

    Piezosupercon- ductivity: Noveleffectsinnoncentrosymmetricsupercon- ductors,

    Anton Kapustin and Leo Radzihovsky, “Piezosupercon- ductivity: Noveleffectsinnoncentrosymmetricsupercon- ductors,” Phys. Rev. B105, 134514 (2022)

    2022

  41. [48]

    Theoryofthesupercurrentdiode effectinRashbasuperconductorswitharbitrarydisorder,

    S.IlicandF.S.Bergeret,“Theoryofthesupercurrentdiode effectinRashbasuperconductorswitharbitrarydisorder,” Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 177001 (2022)

    2022

  42. [49]

    Anomalous Josephsoneffectinplanarnoncentrosymmetricsupercon- ducting devices,

    Jaglul Hasan, Konstantin N. Nesterov, Songci Li, Manuel Houzet,JuliaS.Meyer, andAlexLevchenko,“Anomalous Josephsoneffectinplanarnoncentrosymmetricsupercon- ducting devices,” Physical Review B106, 214518 (2022), publisher: American Physical Society

    2022

  43. [50]

    Symmetry conditions for the superconducting diode ef- fectinchiralsuperconductors,

    Bastian Zinkl, Keita Hamamoto, and Manfred Sigrist, “Symmetry conditions for the superconducting diode ef- fectinchiralsuperconductors,”PhysicalReviewResearch 4, 033167 (2022), publisher: American Physical Society

    2022

  44. [51]

    Anoma- lous Josephson diode effect in superconducting multi- layers,

    A.S.Osin,AlexLevchenko, andMaximKhodas,“Anoma- lous Josephson diode effect in superconducting multi- layers,” Physical Review B109, 184512 (2024), publisher: American Physical Society

    2024

  45. [52]

    Supercurrent diode effect in helical super- conductors,

    Jaglul Hasan, Daniel Shaffer, Maxim Khodas, and Alex Levchenko, “Supercurrent diode effect in helical super- conductors,” Phys. Rev. B110, 024508 (2024)

    2024

  46. [53]

    Superconductivity in atomically thinfilms: Two-dimensionalcriticalstatemodel,

    FilippoGaggioli,GianniBlatter,KostyaS.Novoselov, and Vadim B. Geshkenbein, “Superconductivity in atomically thinfilms: Two-dimensionalcriticalstatemodel,”Physical Review Research6, 023190 (2024), publisher: American Physical Society

    2024

  47. [54]

    Superconducting diode effect in multiphase superconductors,

    Daniel Shaffer, Dmitry V. Chichinadze, and Alex Levchenko, “Superconducting diode effect in multiphase superconductors,” Phys. Rev. B110, 184509 (2024)

    2024

  48. [55]

    Unidirectional Super- conductivity and Diode Effect Induced by Dissipation,

    Akito Daido and Youichi Yanase, “Unidirectional Super- conductivity and Diode Effect Induced by Dissipation,” (2023), arXiv:2310.02539 [cond-mat]

    2023 arXiv

  49. [56]

    Chiral supercon- ducting diode effect by Dzyaloshinsky-Moriya interac- tion,

    Naratip Nunchot and Youichi Yanase, “Chiral supercon- ducting diode effect by Dzyaloshinsky-Moriya interac- tion,” Physical Review B109, 054508 (2024), publisher: American Physical Society

    2024

  50. [57]

    Enhanced Su- perconducting Diode Effect due to Coexisting Phases,

    Sayan Banerjee and Mathias S. Scheurer, “Enhanced Su- perconducting Diode Effect due to Coexisting Phases,” Physical Review Letters 132, 046003 (2024), publisher: American Physical Society

    2024

  51. [58]

    Anatomy of spin and current generation from mag- netization gradients in topological insulators and Rashba metals,

    PanagiotisKotetes,HanoO.M.Sura, andBrianM.Ander- sen, “Anatomy of spin and current generation from mag- netization gradients in topological insulators and Rashba metals,” Physical Review B108, 155310 (2023), publisher: American Physical Society

    2023

  52. [59]

    Finite- momentum Cooper pairing in proximitized altermag- nets,

    Song-BoZhang,Lun-HuiHu, andTitusNeupert,“Finite- momentum Cooper pairing in proximitized altermag- nets,”NatureCommunications 15,1801(2024),number: 1 Publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    2024

  53. [60]

    Altermagnetic superconducting diode effect,

    Sayan Banerjee and Mathias S. Scheurer, “Altermagnetic superconducting diode effect,” Physical Review B110, 024503 (2024), publisher: American Physical Society

    2024

  54. [61]

    Perfect superconducting diode effect in altermagnets,

    Debmalya Chakraborty and Annica M. Black-Schaffer, “Perfect superconducting diode effect in altermagnets,” (2024), arXiv:2408.07747 [cond-mat]

    2024 arXiv

  55. [62]

    Pair Density Waves and Supercurrent Diode Effect in Altermagnets,

    GiBaik Sim and Johannes Knolle, “Pair Density Waves and Supercurrent Diode Effect in Altermagnets,” (2024), arXiv:2407.01513 [cond-mat]

    2024 arXiv

  56. [63]

    Intrin- sic superconducting diode effect in disordered systems,

    Yuhei Ikeda, Akito Daido, and Youichi Yanase, “Intrin- sic superconducting diode effect in disordered systems,” (2022), arXiv:2212.09211 [cond-mat]

    2022 arXiv

  57. [64]

    limits. Moreover, the self-consistency condition im- posed on the order parameter assumed in [46] is only valid in the limit of very strong SOC when corrections due to interband pairing, as well as to the form of the intraband terms, can be neglected, as discussed in [50]. In ...

    2025 arXiv

  58. [65]

    Band- Geometric Origin of Superconducting Diode Effect,

    Jin-Xin Hu, Shuai A. Chen, and K. T. Law, “Band- Geometric Origin of Superconducting Diode Effect,” (2024), arXiv:2403.01080 [cond-mat]

    2024 arXiv

  59. [66]

    Superconducting diode effect in diffusive superconductors and Joseph- son junctions with Rashba spin-orbit coupling,

    Stefan Ilic, Pauli Virtanen, Daniel Crawford, Tero T. Heikkilä, and F. Sebastian Bergeret, “Superconducting diode effect in diffusive superconductors and Joseph- son junctions with Rashba spin-orbit coupling,” (2024), 2406.17046

    2024 arXiv

  60. [67]

    847 (Springer Science & Business Media, 2012)

    Ernst Bauer and Manfred Sigrist,Non-centrosymmetric su- perconductors: introduction and overview, Vol. 847 (Springer Science & Business Media, 2012)

    2012

  61. [68]

    Spinsusceptibilityofnoncentrosymmet- ric superconductors,

    K.V.Samokhin,“Spinsusceptibilityofnoncentrosymmet- ric superconductors,” Phys. Rev. B76, 094516 (2007)

    2007

  62. [69]

    Magnetoelectric effect in dirty su- perconductorswithbrokenmirror symmetry,

    Victor M. Edelstein, “Magnetoelectric effect in dirty su- perconductorswithbrokenmirror symmetry,”Phys.Rev. B 72, 172501 (2005); “Anomalous effect of disorder on spin fluctuations in non-centrosymmetric superconduc- tors,” Phys. Rev. B78, 094514 (2008)

    2005

  63. [71]

    Ginzburg-Landautheoryforimpure superconductors of polar symmetry,

    VictorM.Edelstein,“Ginzburg-Landautheoryforimpure superconductors of polar symmetry,” Physical Review B 103, 094507 (2021), publisher: American Physical Society

    2021

  64. [72]

    PDF File of Supplementary Materials

  65. [73]

    Mechanisms of in-plane magnetic anisotropy in super- conductingNbSe 2,

    Menashe Haim, Alex Levchenko, and Maxim Khodas, 15 “Mechanisms of in-plane magnetic anisotropy in super- conductingNbSe 2,”PhysicalReviewB 105,024515(2022), publisher: American Physical Society

    2022

  66. [74]

    PlanarHalleffect from superconducting fluctuations,

    L.Attias,K.Michaeli, andM.Khodas,“PlanarHalleffect from superconducting fluctuations,” Physical Review B 110, 014521 (2024), publisher: American Physical Society

    2024

  67. [75]

    Sign reversal diode effect in su- perconducting Dayem nanobridges,

    Daniel Margineda, Alessandro Crippa, Elia Strambini, Yuri Fukaya, Maria Teresa Mercaldo, Mario Cuoco, and Francesco Giazotto, “Sign reversal diode effect in su- perconducting Dayem nanobridges,” Communications Physics 6, 1–9 (2023), number: 1 Publisher: Nature Pub- lishing Group

    2023

  68. [76]

    Andreevboundstatesand supercurrent in disordered spin-orbit-coupled nanowire SNS-junctions,

    JonasLidalandJeroenDanon,“Andreevboundstatesand supercurrent in disordered spin-orbit-coupled nanowire SNS-junctions,” (2023), arXiv:2312.13833 [cond-mat]

    2023 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.