Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

Dissecting supergraviton six-point function with lightcone limits and chiral algebra

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Symmetries alone fix the six-point supergraviton correlator in AdS5 x S5.

desk verdict First six-point supergraviton Mellin amplitude in AdS5 x S5, with a genuinely new lightcone-OPE/chiral-algebra strategy; the ansatz-completeness gap is real but not disqualifying, and the paper deserves a serious referee. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.10269 v1 pith:LGBVGH2P submitted 2025-02-14 hep-th

Vasco Goncalves , Maria Nocchi , Xinan Zhou This is my paper
classification hep-th MSC 81T4081T6081T35 PACS 11.25.Tq04.65.+e
keywords AdS5xsupergravitonsix-pointfunctionMellinamplitudeschiralalgebralightconeOPEconformalbootstrapDrukker-PlefkatwistN=4superYang-Mills
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper aims to show that the tree-level six-point correlation function of the $20'$ supergraviton operators in AdS$_5\times$S$^5$ can be computed from symmetry and consistency conditions, with no need to evaluate Witten diagrams. The bootstrap algorithm works entirely in Mellin space: lightcone OPE limits are translated into residues at Mellin poles, and each sector of the amplitude is fixed separately by the chiral algebra constraint, conservation of the R-symmetry current and stress tensor, and the Drukker-Plefka twist. The resulting Mellin amplitude matches the flat-space graviton six-point amplitude obtained from KLT relations, which the paper uses as a check rather than as input. If the claim is right, correlator data at strong coupling that would normally require an effective Lagrangian becomes available for extracting new CFT data.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the translation of lightcone OPE limits into residues of Mellin amplitudes: for $x_{12}^2,x_{34}^2,x_{56}^2\to0$, the poles at $\delta_{12}=\delta_{34}=\delta_{56}=1$ split the six-point amplitude into lower-point correlators with spinning exchanged operators. The chiral algebra condition is imported into Mellin space through these lightcone limits, producing linear relations among three- and four-point functions with different spins and R-symmetry structures. The Drukker-Plefka twist is converted into a difference operator that shifts Mellin-Mandelstam variables, and it fixes the coefficients that survive the chiral algebra and conservation equations.

What would settle it

Compute any six-point supergraviton Witten diagram directly, for example a 3-to-3 exchange with a higher-spin single-trace operator or a genuinely six-point contact diagram, and compare its Mellin amplitude with the published result at generic kinematics; a mismatch, or a pole or R-symmetry structure outside the ansatz (4.1), would falsify the completeness claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that the six-point Mellin amplitude of the $20'$ operators is fixed, up to one overall normalization, by the pole and factorization ansatz (4.1) together with conservation laws, the chiral algebra condition (2.7) applied through lightcone limits, and the Drukker-Plefka twist (2.9). The snowflake sector, defined by three simultaneous lightcone poles at $\delta_{12}=\delta_{34}=\delta_{56}=1$, is solved first and leaves two constants; the double-pole sector is then fixed by two-lightcone chiral algebra relations combined with known four-point functions; the Drukker-Plefka twist fixes the remaining single-pole and regular coefficients. In Section 8 the authors take the high-energy limit of the Mellin amplitude and find exact agreement with the KLT graviton amplitude (8.1), a check they describe as nontrivial because the flat-space limit was not used in fixing the coefficients.

Load-bearing premise

The ansatz assumes the Mellin amplitude is a rational function whose only singularities are the listed poles at $\delta_{ij}=1$ and at $\delta_{12}+\delta_{13}+\delta_{23}+m=2$ with $m\leq 2$, and that only the $20'$ operator, R-symmetry current, and stress tensor are exchanged; if other singularities or exchanged operators exist, the bootstrap would find a different function that still satisfies all imposed constraints.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The full strong-coupling six-point data of the $20'$ sector is now available without Witten-diagram computation, including spinning five-point functions and double-trace contributions obtained by OPE limits.
  • The three-step division into snowflake, double-pole, and single-pole sectors can be applied to correlators with more than six points, where the same Mellin-residue translation of multi-lightcone OPEs is already sketched.
  • One OPE limit of the new result produces spinning five-point functions with a current or stress tensor that were previously unknown, giving new input for higher-point constructions.
  • Because the flat-space limit was used only as a check, the same bootstrap setup can be repeated with the flat-space amplitude as an additional input, which should be useful for massive Kaluza-Klein modes and stringy corrections.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: the same lightcone-plus-chiral-algebra dissection applies to other maximally supersymmetric holographic correlators and to defect CFT form factors, directions the paper only sketches.
  • Beyond the paper: the clean match to the KLT amplitude suggests the six-point AdS amplitude may admit a double-copy or hidden symmetry structure analogous to the four-point AdS double copy; this is not claimed in the paper.
  • Beyond the paper: at finite coupling, the Drukker-Plefka twist analysis implies that protected and unprotected operator towers in the lightcone OPE cancel singularities independently, a prediction that could be tested against weak-coupling SYM data.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper develops a bootstrap strategy to compute the tree-level six-point correlation function of 20' operators in N=4 SYM at strong coupling, equivalently the supergraviton six-point Mellin amplitude in AdS5 x S5. The authors parameterize the Mellin amplitude by the ansatz (4.1), whose poles correspond to exchanges of the supergraviton, the R-symmetry current, and the stress tensor, and then fix the coefficients in three steps: the chiral algebra condition in the triple-lightcone (snowflake) channel, the chiral algebra condition with two simultaneous lightcone limits, and the Drukker-Plefka twist. The resulting amplitude is compared with the flat-space KLT graviton amplitude in the high-energy limit and is reported to match. The claimed novelty is the use of lightcone OPEs to implement chiral algebra constraints directly in Mellin space, allowing different parts of the correlator to be fixed separately.

Significance. If correct, this is a significant technical advance: it produces a six-point holographic correlator involving protected and unprotected OPE data without explicitly computing Witten diagrams, and it gives a detailed picture of which bootstrap constraints fix which sectors of the amplitude. The paper contains several concrete checks: factorization into known lower-point Mellin amplitudes, conservation equations for the current and stress tensor, the chiral algebra and Drukker-Plefka twist conditions, and the flat-space KLT comparison. The ancillary notebook provides the final result and intermediate expressions, which aids reproducibility. The main limitation is that the central claim depends on the ansatz (4.1) being exhaustive, and this exhaustiveness is asserted more than proved; the flat-space check, while nontrivial, probes the leading high-energy behavior and is not sensitive to all subleading terms that an incomplete ansatz could miss.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 4, Appendix A.3] The completeness of the ansatz in (4.1) is the load-bearing assumption of the paper, but it is only checked, not proved. The pole truncation is justified by factorization of a limited set of 4-4 and 3-5 channels in Appendix A.3, and Section 3.1 explicitly states that multi-factorization with two or three spinning lines is not handled by a general Mellin factorization formula: 'It is not clear how to further extend the Mellin representation (3.2) to handle the generic case'. Since the bootstrap solves for the coefficients inside this ansatz, any contribution with a pole location not contained in (4.1), such as a descendant at δij=3, a three-sum pole with m>2, or an exchange topology with different singularity structure, would change the resulting amplitude. The flat-space KLT comparison in Section 8 tests the high-energy limit and is insensitive to such subleading pole and contact terms. I ask the authors to provide a sharper argument for exhaustiveness of (4.1), or to state explicitly what Witten-diagram topologies are being excluded and why they cannot contribute.
  2. [Section 7, Eqs. (7.1)-(7.3)] The Mellin-space implementation of the Drukker-Plefka twist does not fully account for contour effects. The paper states, 'we have not kept track of the Mellin integral contours ... pinching mechanisms can produce nonzero terms in position space from vanishing amplitudes', and then says a more careful analysis 'should reproduce' the constant on the RHS of (2.9). The subsequent fixing of the remaining P2 and P1 coefficients equates the shifted Mellin amplitude to zero. This is a nontrivial gap: if contour pinching produces a constant or other position-space terms, the vanishing condition on the Mellin amplitude may be too strong, or may miss contact contributions. The final result depends on this step, so the twist implementation needs to be justified or the contour contributions computed explicitly.
  3. [Sections 3.2, 3.3, and ancillary file] Several formulas that are essential for reproducing the result are not present in the text. After Eq. (3.21) the paper says 'the exact details are too lengthy to write down here explicitly', and the functions Q^{J1J2}_{k1k2ℓ}, M^{ℓ1ℓ2ℓ3}_{J1J2J3}, and the final six-point amplitude are relegated to an ancillary Mathematica notebook. For a central claim of this scope, the reader cannot verify from the printed text that the bootstrap constraints were implemented as described, nor can the number of unknowns at each stage be checked. Please include at least the complete ansatz and the key constraints in the paper or provide a documented, self-contained derivation in the ancillary file with explicit coefficient counts at each step.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 2.1] In the sentence preceding Eq. (2.6), '2d place' should read '2d plane'.
  2. [Section 7 heading] The heading 'Drukker-Plekfa twist' is a typo and should be 'Drukker-Plefka twist'.
  3. [Section 4, Eq. (4.1)] The notation 'perm' would be clearer if the paper stated explicitly that the sum runs over all distinct permutations of the six external legs and explained how overlapping terms (e.g., a triple pole appearing in multiple permuted terms) are handled.
  4. [Section 8, Eqs. (8.1)-(8.3)] The use of A_graviton for both the flat-space gravity amplitude and the Mellin-space residue notation is confusing; please distinguish the two objects or define the notation separately.
  5. [Section 9] The discussion of finite-coupling implications in Section 7 is interesting but is not used in the main result; consider restructuring so that the reader distinguishes the main bootstrap derivation from the speculative finite-coupling remarks.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the six-point amplitude is fixed from external chiral algebra and Drukker-Plefka constraints, then checked against flat-space KLT.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. The inputs are external or independently established: the chiral algebra constraint (2.7) from [24], the Drukker-Plefka twist (2.9) from [25], Mellin factorization from [28], and lower-point correlators from [17, 32]. None of these inputs contains the six-point function being solved for, and the cited lower-point results are parameter-free prior computations that do not assume the target. The ansatz (4.1) is an assumption about pole structure; its truncation is partially justified in Appendix A.3, and the paper explicitly flags the parts that are not derived. An incomplete ansatz would be a correctness risk, not a circular reduction, because the constraints are not definitionally tied to the output. The flat-space KLT amplitude (8.1) is used as a check, not as a source of the coefficient values; the only flat-space inputs used in the bootstrap are the linear energy growth, subleading current contribution, and spin-2 dominance in the snowflake channel, and the paper demonstrates the check is nontrivial by noting that several coefficients fixed by the Drukker-Plefka twist are also sensitive to the flat-space limit. Self-citations to [17, 18, 28] are to independent prior results and do not smuggle in the six-point answer. I find no equation that is equivalent to its own input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The computation introduces no new physical entities. It relies on the standard supergravity spectrum (20', current J, stress tensor T) and three imported constraints: chiral algebra, Drukker-Plefka twist, and Mellin factorization. The main paper-specific assumption is the completeness and truncation of the Mellin ansatz; all other inputs are prior results or standard theorems. The overall normalization is the only unfixed parameter, which is a conventional ambiguity rather than a fitted shape parameter.

free parameters (1)
  • Overall normalization coefficient p000_000 = not fixed by bootstrap
    The bootstrap fixes the six-point Mellin amplitude only up to an overall multiplicative constant; all other coefficients are determined in terms of this one. It is a normalization ambiguity, not a shape parameter fitted to data.
assumptions (8)
  • domain assumption AdS/CFT duality and the supergravity (large N, large lambda) limit
    The six-point function of 20' operators is equated to tree-level Witten diagrams in AdS5 x S5, used throughout Sections 1-4.
  • domain assumption Chiral algebra theorem (co-plane twisted correlators are meromorphic)
    Assumed in (2.7) from [24]; the entire constraint strategy rests on this theorem.
  • domain assumption Drukker-Plefka topological twist (y_ij = x^2_ij gives constant correlator)
    Assumed in (2.9) from [25]; used in Section 7 to fix the remaining coefficients.
  • domain assumption Lightcone OPE formula for identical scalar operators
    Equation (3.13) taken from [34]; the basis for translating lightcone limits into Mellin residues.
  • domain assumption Mellin factorization formulas for spinning exchanges
    Used in Section 3 and Appendix A.3 to express residues in terms of lower-point amplitudes, following [28].
  • ad hoc to paper Ansatz completeness and pole truncation (4.1)
    Assumes the Mellin amplitude is rational with poles only at delta_ij = 1 and delta_12 + delta_13 + delta_23 + m = 2 (m at most 2) and with specified polynomial degree bounds; partial justification via factorization in Appendix A.3.
  • domain assumption Conservation equations for R-symmetry current and stress tensor
    Imposed in Sections 5 and 7 to constrain out-of-plane and regular parts of the ansatz.
  • domain assumption Flat-space large-energy growth and subleading current contribution
    Used to set polynomial degrees and to fix one coefficient in the snowflake channel; the full flat-space amplitude is not used as input.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Dissecting supergraviton six-point function with lightcone limits and chiral algebra." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LGBVGH2P

@misc{pith2026250210269,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Dissecting supergraviton six-point function with lightcone limits and chiral algebra},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LGBVGH2P}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.10269}
}
abstract

We develop a bootstrap strategy to obtain the six-point function of supergravitons in $AdS_5\times S^5$ from symmetry constraints and consistency conditions. Compared to previous bootstrap algorithms, a novel feature is the use of lightcone OPEs together with the chiral algebra constraint. This makes it possible to isolate different parts of the correlator and fix them separately. Our strategy allows us to gain a refined understanding of the power of different bootstrap constraints, which is also useful for computing more general correlators.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Higher-Point Correlators in N=4 SYM: Ten-Dimensional Null Polygons

    hep-th 2025-12 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A general two-loop formula is obtained for all n-point 10d null polygon correlators in planar N=4 SYM, expressed in a conformal-integral basis and verified numerically at 11 points.

  2. Chiral algebra correlators of the $6$d, $\mathcal{N}=(2,0)$ theory with a defect

    hep-th 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A chiral-algebra bootstrap reproduces the defect two-point correlators of the 6d (2,0) theory using only bulk-channel data and predicts new defect-channel OPE coefficients.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 6 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Mellin amplitudes for AdS5 × S5,

    L. Rastelli and X. Zhou, “Mellin amplitudes for AdS5 × S5,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 no. 9, (2017) 091602, arXiv:1608.06624 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2017

  2. [2]

    How to Succeed at Holographic Correlators Without Really Trying,

    L. Rastelli and X. Zhou, “How to Succeed at Holographic Correlators Without Really Trying,” JHEP 04 (2018) 014, arXiv:1710.05923 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2018

  3. [3]

    Selected topics in analytic conformal bootstrap: A guided journey,

    A. Bissi, A. Sinha, and X. Zhou, “Selected topics in analytic conformal bootstrap: A guided journey,” Phys. Rept. 991 (2022) 1–89, arXiv:2202.08475 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2022

  4. [4]

    All Tree-Level Correlators for M-theory on AdS7 × S4,

    L. F. Alday and X. Zhou, “All Tree-Level Correlators for M-theory on AdS7 × S4,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 no. 13, (2020) 131604, arXiv:2006.06653 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2020

  5. [5]

    All Holographic Four-Point Functions in All Maximally Supersymmetric CFTs,

    L. F. Alday and X. Zhou, “All Holographic Four-Point Functions in All Maximally Supersymmetric CFTs,” Phys. Rev. X 11 no. 1, (2021) 011056, arXiv:2006.12505 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2021

  6. [6]

    AdS3 × S3 Tree-Level Correlators: Hidden Six-Dimensional Conformal Symmetry,

    L. Rastelli, K. Roumpedakis, and X. Zhou, “ AdS3 × S3 Tree-Level Correlators: Hidden Six-Dimensional Conformal Symmetry,” JHEP 10 (2019) 140, arXiv:1905.11983 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2019

  7. [7]

    The CFT 6 origin of all tree-level 4-point correlators in AdS 3 × S3,

    S. Giusto, R. Russo, A. Tyukov, and C. Wen, “The CFT 6 origin of all tree-level 4-point correlators in AdS 3 × S3,” Eur. Phys. J. C 80 no. 8, (2020) 736, arXiv:2005.08560 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2020

  8. [8]

    Gluon Scattering in AdS from CFT,

    L. F. Alday, C. Behan, P. Ferrero, and X. Zhou, “Gluon Scattering in AdS from CFT,” JHEP 06 (2021) 020, arXiv:2103.15830 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2021

Show all 53 references
  1. [9]

    All Tree-Level Correlators in AdS 5×S5 Supergravity: Hidden Ten-Dimensional Conformal Symmetry,

    S. Caron-Huot and A.-K. Trinh, “All Tree-Level Correlators in AdS 5×S5 Supergravity: Hidden Ten-Dimensional Conformal Symmetry,” JHEP 01 (2019) 196, arXiv:1809.09173 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  2. [10]

    More on holographic correlators: Twisted and dimensionally reduced structures,

    C. Behan, P. Ferrero, and X. Zhou, “More on holographic correlators: Twisted and dimensionally reduced structures,” JHEP 04 (2021) 008, arXiv:2101.04114 [hep-th]. – 34 –

    2021 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Double Copy Relation in AdS Space,

    X. Zhou, “Double Copy Relation in AdS Space,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 no. 14, (2021) 141601, arXiv:2106.07651 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Holographic correlators with multi-particle states,

    N. Ceplak, S. Giusto, M. R. R. Hughes, and R. Russo, “Holographic correlators with multi-particle states,” JHEP 09 (2021) 204, arXiv:2105.04670 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Rebooting quarter-BPS operators in N = 4 super Yang-Mills,

    A. Bissi, G. Fardelli, and A. Manenti, “Rebooting quarter-BPS operators in N = 4 super Yang-Mills,” JHEP 04 (2022) 016, arXiv:2111.06857 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Scattering bound states in AdS,

    W.-J. Ma and X. Zhou, “Scattering bound states in AdS,” JHEP 08 (2022) 107, arXiv:2204.13419 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Holographic correlators with BPS bound states in N = 4 SYM,

    F. Aprile, S. Giusto, and R. Russo, “Holographic correlators with BPS bound states in N = 4 SYM,” arXiv:2409.12911 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  8. [16]

    Composite operators in N = 4 Super Yang-Mills,

    A. Bissi, G. Fardelli, and A. Manenti, “Composite operators in N = 4 Super Yang-Mills,” arXiv:2412.19788 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  9. [17]

    20′ Five-Point Function from AdS5 × S5 Supergravity,

    V. Gon¸ calves, R. Pereira, and X. Zhou, “20′ Five-Point Function from AdS5 × S5 Supergravity,” JHEP 10 (2019) 247, arXiv:1906.05305 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Kaluza-Klein Five-Point Functions from AdS5 × S5 Supergravity,

    V. Gon¸ calves, C. Meneghelli, R. Pereira, J. Vilas Boas, and X. Zhou, “Kaluza-Klein Five-Point Functions from AdS5 × S5 Supergravity,” arXiv:2302.01896 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  11. [19]

    Supersymmetric Five-Point Gluon Amplitudes in AdS Space,

    L. F. Alday, V. Gon¸ calves, and X. Zhou, “Supersymmetric Five-Point Gluon Amplitudes in AdS Space,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 no. 16, (2022) 161601, arXiv:2201.04422 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Six-Point AdS Gluon Amplitudes from Flat Space and Factorization,

    L. F. Alday, V. Gon¸ calves, M. Nocchi, and X. Zhou, “Six-Point AdS Gluon Amplitudes from Flat Space and Factorization,” arXiv:2307.06884 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  13. [21]

    Constructibility of AdS Supergluon Amplitudes,

    Q. Cao, S. He, and Y. Tang, “Constructibility of AdS Supergluon Amplitudes,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 133 no. 2, (2024) 021605, arXiv:2312.15484 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Supergluon scattering in AdS: constructibility, spinning amplitudes, and new structures,

    Q. Cao, S. He, X. Li, and Y. Tang, “Supergluon scattering in AdS: constructibility, spinning amplitudes, and new structures,” JHEP 10 (2024) 040, arXiv:2406.08538 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  15. [23]

    All Five-point Kaluza-Klein Correlators and Hidden 8d Symmetry in AdS 5 × S3,

    Z. Huang, B. Wang, E. Y. Yuan, and J. Zhang, “All Five-point Kaluza-Klein Correlators and Hidden 8d Symmetry in AdS 5 × S3,” arXiv:2408.12260 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  16. [24]

    Infinite chiral symmetry in four dimensions,

    C. Beem, M. Lemos, P. Liendo, W. Peelaers, L. Rastelli, and B. C. van Rees, “Infinite chiral symmetry in four dimensions,” Commun. Math. Phys. 336 (2015) 1359–1433, 1312.5344

    2015 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Superprotected n-point correlation functions of local operators in N=4 super Yang-Mills,

    N. Drukker and J. Plefka, “Superprotected n-point correlation functions of local operators in N=4 super Yang-Mills,” JHEP 04 (2009) 052, arXiv:0901.3653 [hep-th]

    2009 arXiv

  18. [26]

    D-independent representation of Conformal Field Theories in D dimensions via transformation to auxiliary Dual Resonance Models. Scalar amplitudes,

    G. Mack, “D-independent representation of Conformal Field Theories in D dimensions via transformation to auxiliary Dual Resonance Models. Scalar amplitudes,” arXiv:0907.2407 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  19. [27]

    Writing CFT correlation functions as AdS scattering amplitudes,

    J. Penedones, “Writing CFT correlation functions as AdS scattering amplitudes,” JHEP 03 (2011) 025, arXiv:1011.1485 [hep-th]

    2011 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Factorization of Mellin amplitudes,

    V. Gon¸ calves, J. Penedones, and E. Trevisani, “Factorization of Mellin amplitudes,”JHEP 10 (2015) 040, arXiv:1410.4185 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  21. [29]

    The M-Theory S-Matrix From ABJM: Beyond 11D Supergravity,

    S. M. Chester, S. S. Pufu, and X. Yin, “The M-Theory S-Matrix From ABJM: Beyond 11D Supergravity,” JHEP 08 (2018) 115, arXiv:1804.00949 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Conformal partial waves and the operator product expansion,

    F. A. Dolan and H. Osborn, “Conformal partial waves and the operator product expansion,” Nucl. Phys. B 678 (2004) 491–507, arXiv:hep-th/0309180. – 35 –

    2004 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Recursion Relations in Witten Diagrams and Conformal Partial Waves,

    X. Zhou, “Recursion Relations in Witten Diagrams and Conformal Partial Waves,” JHEP 05 (2019) 006, arXiv:1812.01006 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  24. [32]

    N=4 superconformal Ward identities for correlation functions,

    A. V. Belitsky, S. Hohenegger, G. P. Korchemsky, and E. Sokatchev, “N=4 superconformal Ward identities for correlation functions,” Nucl. Phys. B 904 (2016) 176–215, arXiv:1409.2502 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  25. [33]

    The SAGEX Review on Scattering Amplitudes, Chapter 8: Half BPS correlators,

    P. Heslop, “The SAGEX Review on Scattering Amplitudes, Chapter 8: Half BPS correlators,” J. Phys. A 55 no. 44, (2022) 443009, arXiv:2203.13019 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Light-Cone Bootstrap of Higher Point Functions and Wilson Loop Duality,

    C. Bercini, V. Gon¸ calves, and P. Vieira, “Light-Cone Bootstrap of Higher Point Functions and Wilson Loop Duality,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 no. 12, (2021) 121603, arXiv:2008.10407 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Spinning Conformal Correlators,

    M. S. Costa, J. Penedones, D. Poland, and S. Rychkov, “Spinning Conformal Correlators,” JHEP 11 (2011) 071, arXiv:1107.3554 [hep-th]

    2011 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Lightcone bootstrap at higher points,

    A. Antunes, M. S. Costa, V. Goncalves, and J. V. Boas, “Lightcone bootstrap at higher points,” JHEP 03 (2022) 139, arXiv:2111.05453 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Three point functions in N=4 Yang-Mills,

    P. S. Howe, E. Sokatchev, and P. C. West, “Three point functions in N=4 Yang-Mills,” Phys. Lett. B 444 (1998) 341–351, arXiv:hep-th/9808162

    1998 arXiv

  30. [38]

    A note on three-point functions of conserved currents,

    A. Zhiboedov, “A note on three-point functions of conserved currents,” arXiv:1206.6370 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  31. [39]

    On Superconformal Four-Point Mellin Amplitudes in Dimension d >2,

    X. Zhou, “On Superconformal Four-Point Mellin Amplitudes in Dimension d >2,” JHEP 08 (2018) 187, arXiv:1712.02800 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  32. [40]

    A Relation Between Tree Amplitudes of Closed and Open Strings,

    H. Kawai, D. C. Lewellen, and S. H. H. Tye, “A Relation Between Tree Amplitudes of Closed and Open Strings,” Nucl. Phys. B 269 (1986) 1–23

    1986

  33. [41]

    Bootstrapping holographic defect correlators in N = 4 super Yang-Mills,

    J. Barrat, A. Gimenez-Grau, and P. Liendo, “Bootstrapping holographic defect correlators in N = 4 super Yang-Mills,” JHEP 04 (2022) 093, arXiv:2108.13432 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Bootstrapping string dynamics in the 6d N = (2, 0) theories,

    C. Meneghelli and M. Tr´ epanier, “Bootstrapping string dynamics in the 6d N = (2, 0) theories,” JHEP 07 (2023) 165, arXiv:2212.05020 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Aspects of higher-point functions in BCFT d,

    J. Chen and X. Zhou, “Aspects of higher-point functions in BCFT d,” JHEP 09 (2023) 204, arXiv:2304.11799 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  36. [44]

    The Witten Diagram Bootstrap for Holographic Defects,

    A. Gimenez-Grau, “The Witten Diagram Bootstrap for Holographic Defects,” arXiv:2306.11896 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  37. [45]

    Defect two-point functions in 6D (2,0) theories,

    J. Chen, A. Gimenez-Grau, and X. Zhou, “Defect two-point functions in 6D (2,0) theories,” Phys. Rev. D 109 no. 6, (2024) L061903, arXiv:2310.19230 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Unitarity Method for Holographic Defects,

    J. Chen, A. Gimenez-Grau, H. Paul, and X. Zhou, “Unitarity Method for Holographic Defects,” arXiv:2406.13287 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  39. [47]

    Correlators of N=4 Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory on Real Projective Space at Strong Coupling,

    X. Zhou, “Correlators of N=4 Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory on Real Projective Space at Strong Coupling,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 133 no. 20, (2024) 201602, arXiv:2408.04926 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Flat-space limit of defect correlators and stringy AdS form factors,

    L. F. Alday and X. Zhou, “Flat-space limit of defect correlators and stringy AdS form factors,” arXiv:2411.04378 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  41. [49]

    Mellin Amplitudes for Dual Conformal Integrals,

    M. F. Paulos, M. Spradlin, and A. Volovich, “Mellin Amplitudes for Dual Conformal Integrals,” JHEP 08 (2012) 072, arXiv:1203.6362 [hep-th]. – 36 –

    2012 arXiv

  42. [50]

    One-loop integrals from volumes of orthoschemes,

    L. Ren, M. Spradlin, C. Vergu, and A. Volovich, “One-loop integrals from volumes of orthoschemes,” JHEP 05 (2024) 104, arXiv:2306.04630 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  43. [51]

    The one-loop six-dimensional hexagon integral with three massive corners,

    V. Del Duca, L. J. Dixon, J. M. Drummond, C. Duhr, J. M. Henn, and V. A. Smirnov, “The one-loop six-dimensional hexagon integral with three massive corners,” Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 045017, arXiv:1105.2011 [hep-th]

    2011 arXiv

  44. [52]

    All planar two-loop amplitudes in maximally supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory,

    A. Spiering, M. Wilhelm, and C. Zhang, “All planar two-loop amplitudes in maximally supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory,” arXiv:2406.15549 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  45. [53]

    Two-loop integrals of half-BPS six-point functions on a line,

    R. Rodrigues, “Two-loop integrals of half-BPS six-point functions on a line,” JHEP 05 (2024) 007, arXiv:2402.08463 [hep-th]. – 37 –

    2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.