pith. sign in

arxiv: 2502.11803 · v2 · submitted 2025-02-17 · 🪐 quant-ph

High-Harmonic Generation in a Crystal Driven by Quantum Light

Rasmus Vesterager Gothelf , Christian Saugbjerg Lange , Lars Bojer Madsen This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 03:01 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords high-harmonic generationquantum lightintraband dynamicsZnObright-squeezed vacuumthermal lightFloquet limitcutoff
0
0 comments X

The pith

Thermal light and bright-squeezed vacuum produce much higher harmonic cutoffs in crystals than coherent or Fock states.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper adapts a coherent-state-expansion framework originally for atoms to study intraband high-harmonic generation in a ZnO crystal model driven by quantum light. Analytical calculations in the Floquet limit show that thermal light and bright-squeezed vacuum yield substantially higher cutoffs than coherent states or Fock states of comparable intensity. The work also derives that the emitted electric field inherits statistical properties from the driver. This matters because it identifies how the quantum character of the driving field directly shapes the nonlinear optical response in solids. The study further examines the practical limits of an approximate positive-P representation for reducing computational cost with certain nonclassical states.

Core claim

In the Floquet limit, the coherent-state-expansion approach reveals that the photon-number distribution of the driving field controls the extent of the harmonic plateau: thermal light and bright-squeezed vacuum, whose distributions permit higher photon-number components, generate harmonics to higher orders than coherent states or number states, while the generated field fluctuations mirror those of the input.

What carries the argument

Coherent-state expansions via P distributions applied to the intraband ZnO model, analyzed in the Floquet limit.

If this is right

  • Thermal and bright-squeezed-vacuum drivers extend the harmonic cutoff beyond that reachable with coherent or Fock states at the same intensity.
  • The time-dependent emitted electric field and its fluctuations directly inherit statistical features of the driving quantum state.
  • The intensity scaling of individual harmonics depends on the photon statistics of the driver.
  • An approximate positive-P representation lowers the numerical cost for Fock and BSV drivers but requires care to avoid artifacts.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Experiments could test whether switching to bright-squeezed vacuum allows access to higher harmonics in solids without raising the average driving intensity.
  • Inherited fluctuations in the emitted field open the possibility of transferring quantum correlations from the driver into the harmonic spectrum.
  • If the intraband approximation breaks for nonclassical drivers, the predicted cutoff advantage could be reduced or eliminated.

Load-bearing premise

The coherent-state-expansion framework developed for atomic HHG transfers directly to the intraband dynamics of a crystal without introducing qualitatively new corrections.

What would settle it

Experimentally compare the harmonic cutoff in ZnO when driven by a thermal state versus a coherent state of equal mean intensity and check whether the cutoff is observably higher for the thermal driver.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.11803 by Christian Saugbjerg Lange, Lars Bojer Madsen, Rasmus Vesterager Gothelf.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Simulated HHG spectra using the parameters spec [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Illustration of the radial distribution functions, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Solid, blue curves show the mean photon count [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Time-resolved electric field generated by HHG for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Time-resolved electric driving fields for coherent, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We study intraband high-harmonic generation (HHG) in a crystal driven by quantum light. Previous theoretical studies have developed a framework based on coherent state expansions in terms of P distributions to consider nonclassical driving fields for HHG in atoms. Here, we adapt this framework to the context of solids and consider an intraband model of ZnO. We investigate the effect of the quantum optical nature of the driving field on the harmonic spectra including the cutoff and the intensity scaling of the harmonics with driving field intensity. Based on analytical calculations in the Floquet limit, we explain why driving with thermal light or bright-squeezed vacuum (BSV) produces a much higher cutoff than when driving with fields described by coherent or Fock states. Further, we derive an expression for the generated time-dependent electric field and its fluctuations and find that it inherits characteristics of the driving field. Finally, we discuss the limitations of an approximative positive P representation, which is introduced to be able to reduce the numerical complexity for Fock and BSV driving fields.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper adapts a coherent-state expansion framework based on P-distributions, previously developed for atomic HHG, to an intraband model of ZnO. It presents analytical calculations in the Floquet limit to explain why thermal light and bright-squeezed vacuum (BSV) driving fields yield higher harmonic cutoffs than coherent or Fock states, derives an expression for the generated time-dependent electric field and its fluctuations (which inherit driving-field characteristics), and discusses limitations of an approximative positive-P representation used to reduce numerical complexity for Fock and BSV cases.

Significance. If the central adaptation holds without qualitatively new corrections from the crystal's periodic potential or Bloch dispersion, the analytical insight into cutoff scaling with nonclassical drivers would be a useful extension of quantum-light HHG concepts to solids, potentially informing experiments on intensity scaling and field fluctuations. The explicit discussion of positive-P limitations is a strength, as is the focus on falsifiable predictions for cutoff differences.

major comments (2)
  1. [Floquet-limit calculations (abstract and main text)] The central cutoff claim rests on the Floquet-limit analytical calculations, but the manuscript provides no explicit derivation steps showing how the atomic P-representation equations are mapped onto the intraband ZnO Hamiltonian (including the momentum-dependent velocity operator and periodic potential); this adaptation is load-bearing and its validity is not demonstrated against possible solid-specific corrections.
  2. [Discussion of positive-P limitations] The abstract states that the positive-P representation is approximative for Fock and BSV fields and is introduced to reduce numerical complexity, yet no quantitative error bounds, validation against exact methods, or sensitivity analysis on the reported cutoff difference is given; this undermines assessment of whether the higher-cutoff result for thermal/BSV survives the approximation.
minor comments (1)
  1. Notation for the P-distribution and the generated-field fluctuation expression should be cross-referenced explicitly to the atomic framework being adapted for clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments. We respond to each major comment below and indicate the revisions that will be incorporated.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Floquet-limit calculations (abstract and main text)] The central cutoff claim rests on the Floquet-limit analytical calculations, but the manuscript provides no explicit derivation steps showing how the atomic P-representation equations are mapped onto the intraband ZnO Hamiltonian (including the momentum-dependent velocity operator and periodic potential); this adaptation is load-bearing and its validity is not demonstrated against possible solid-specific corrections.

    Authors: We agree that the explicit mapping steps were not provided. The adaptation replaces the atomic dipole operator with the intraband velocity operator v(k) = ħ^{-1} dE(k)/dk derived from the ZnO band dispersion, while the periodic potential enters through the band structure in the minimal-coupling Hamiltonian. The P-distribution evolution equations then follow identically from the coherent-state expansion, with the driving field entering via the vector potential. Interband transitions and other solid-specific effects lie outside the intraband model, which is the standard approximation used here. In the revised manuscript we will add an appendix containing the full derivation and a discussion of the approximation's regime of validity. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Discussion of positive-P limitations] The abstract states that the positive-P representation is approximative for Fock and BSV fields and is introduced to reduce numerical complexity, yet no quantitative error bounds, validation against exact methods, or sensitivity analysis on the reported cutoff difference is given; this undermines assessment of whether the higher-cutoff result for thermal/BSV survives the approximation.

    Authors: The positive-P representation is employed solely to enable numerical sampling for states whose P-distributions are not positive semi-definite. The higher-cutoff result for thermal light and BSV is obtained from exact analytical Floquet-limit expressions that do not invoke this approximation. For the Fock and BSV numerical spectra the approximation affects only quantitative details. We will add to the revised manuscript a quantitative error estimate obtained by comparing the approximative results against exact calculations for small photon-number truncations, together with a sensitivity analysis of the cutoff with respect to the positive-P sampling parameters. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: external atomic framework adapted to crystal model

full rationale

The paper explicitly adapts a prior coherent-state P-distribution framework developed for atomic HHG to an intraband ZnO model, with central cutoff results obtained via analytical Floquet-limit calculations on that adapted model. No equations reduce a derived quantity to a parameter fitted inside the paper, no self-citations are invoked as load-bearing uniqueness theorems, and no ansatz is smuggled via author-overlapping citations. The positive-P approximation is introduced with its limitations noted, but the derivation chain remains self-contained against the external atomic reference without internal redefinition or renaming of known results.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the transferability of the atomic P-distribution framework and on the sufficiency of the chosen intraband ZnO model; no free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The coherent-state-expansion framework based on P distributions developed for atoms applies without major modification to intraband HHG in solids.
    The paper states that it adapts this framework to the context of solids.
  • domain assumption The intraband model of ZnO captures the essential physics of HHG driven by quantum light.
    The study is performed within an intraband model of ZnO.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5720 in / 1426 out tokens · 45869 ms · 2026-05-23T03:01:51.014381+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Ferray, A

    M. Ferray, A. L’Huillier, X. F. Li, L. A. Lompre, G. Main- fray, and C. Manus, Multiple-harmonic conversion of 1064 nm radiation in rare gases, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics 21, L31 (1988)

    work page 1988

  2. [2]

    P. B. Corkum, Plasma perspective on strong field mul- tiphoton ionization, Physical Review Letters 71, 1994 (1993)

    work page 1994

  3. [3]

    Lewenstein, Ph

    M. Lewenstein, Ph. Balcou, M. Yu. Ivanov, A. L’Huillier, and P. B. Corkum, Theory of high-harmonic generation by low-frequency laser fields, Physical Review A49, 2117 (1994)

    work page 1994

  4. [4]

    P. M. Paul, E. S. Toma, P. Breger, G. Mullot, F. Aug´ e, Ph. Balcou, H. G. Muller, and P. Agostini, Observation of a Train of Attosecond Pulses from High Harmonic Gen- eration, Science 292, 1689 (2001)

    work page 2001

  5. [5]

    Hentschel, R

    M. Hentschel, R. Kienberger, C. Spielmann, G. A. Rei- der, N. Milosevic, T. Brabec, P. Corkum, U. Heinzmann, M. Drescher, and F. Krausz, Attosecond metrology, Na- ture 414, 509 (2001)

    work page 2001

  6. [6]

    Krausz and M

    F. Krausz and M. Ivanov, Attosecond physics, Reviews of Modern Physics 81, 163 (2009)

    work page 2009

  7. [7]

    D. M. Villeneuve, Attosecond science, Contemporary Physics 59, 47 (2018)

    work page 2018

  8. [8]

    Vampa and T

    G. Vampa and T. Brabec, Merge of high harmonic gen- eration from gases and solids and its implications for at- tosecond science, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecu- lar and Optical Physics 50, 083001 (2017)

    work page 2017

  9. [9]

    Ghimire, A

    S. Ghimire, A. D. DiChiara, E. Sistrunk, P. Agostini, L. F. DiMauro, and D. A. Reis, Observation of high-order harmonic generation in a bulk crystal, Nature Physics 7, 138 (2011)

    work page 2011

  10. [10]

    Bauer and K

    D. Bauer and K. K. Hansen, High-Harmonic Genera- tion in Solids with and without Topological Edge States, Physical Review Letters 120, 177401 (2018)

    work page 2018

  11. [11]

    Y. Bai, F. Fei, S. Wang, N. Li, X. Li, F. Song, R. Li, Z. Xu, and P. Liu, High-harmonic generation from topo- logical surface states, Nature Physics 17, 311 (2021)

    work page 2021

  12. [12]

    Morimoto and N

    T. Morimoto and N. Nagaosa, Topological nature of nonlinear optical effects in solids, Science Advances 2, e1501524 (2016)

    work page 2016

  13. [13]

    Chac´ on, D

    A. Chac´ on, D. Kim, W. Zhu, S. P. Kelly, A. Dauphin, E. Pisanty, A. S. Maxwell, A. Pic´ on, M. F. Ciappina, D. E. Kim, C. Ticknor, A. Saxena, and M. Lewenstein, Circular dichroism in higher-order harmonic generation: Heralding topological phases and transitions in Chern in- sulators, Physical Review B 102, 134115 (2020)

    work page 2020

  14. [14]

    R. E. F. Silva, ´A. Jim´ enez-Gal´ an, B. Amorim, O. Smirnova, and M. Ivanov, Topological strong-field physics on sub-laser-cycle timescale, Nature Photonics 13, 849 (2019)

    work page 2019

  15. [15]

    Ghimire, A

    S. Ghimire, A. D. DiChiara, E. Sistrunk, G. Nd- abashimiye, U. B. Szafruga, A. Mohammad, P. Agostini, L. F. DiMauro, and D. A. Reis, Generation and propaga- tion of high-order harmonics in crystals, Physical Review A 85, 043836 (2012)

    work page 2012

  16. [16]

    Vampa, C

    G. Vampa, C. R. McDonald, G. Orlando, D. D. Klug, P. B. Corkum, and T. Brabec, Theoretical Analysis of High-Harmonic Generation in Solids, Physical Review Letters 113, 073901 (2014)

    work page 2014

  17. [17]

    Yue and M

    L. Yue and M. B. Gaarde, Introduction to theory of high- harmonic generation in solids: Tutorial, JOSA B 39, 535 (2022)

    work page 2022

  18. [18]

    Vampa, T

    G. Vampa, T. J. Hammond, N. Thir´ e, B. E. Schmidt, F. L´ egar´ e, C. R. McDonald, T. Brabec, D. D. Klug, and P. B. Corkum, All-Optical Reconstruction of Crys- tal Band Structure, Physical Review Letters 115, 193603 (2015)

    work page 2015

  19. [19]

    Gorlach, O

    A. Gorlach, O. Neufeld, N. Rivera, O. Cohen, and I. Kaminer, The quantum-optical nature of high har- monic generation, Nature Communications 11, 4598 (2020)

    work page 2020

  20. [20]

    Stammer, J

    P. Stammer, J. Rivera-Dean, T. Lamprou, E. Pisanty, M. F. Ciappina, P. Tzallas, and M. Lewenstein, High Photon Number Entangled States and Coherent State Superposition from the Extreme Ultraviolet to the Far Infrared, Physical Review Letters 128, 123603 (2022)

    work page 2022

  21. [21]

    Stammer, J

    P. Stammer, J. Rivera-Dean, A. Maxwell, T. Lamprou, A. Ord´ o˜ nez, M. F. Ciappina, P. Tzallas, and M. Lewen- stein, Quantum Electrodynamics of Intense Laser-Matter Interactions: A Tool for Quantum State Engineering, PRX Quantum 4, 010201 (2023)

    work page 2023

  22. [22]

    Bhattacharya, T

    U. Bhattacharya, T. Lamprou, A. S. Maxwell, A. Ord´ o˜ nez, E. Pisanty, J. Rivera-Dean, P. Stammer, M. F. Ciappina, M. Lewenstein, and P. Tzallas, Strong– laser–field physics, non–classical light states and quan- tum information science, Reports on Progress in Physics 86, 094401 (2023)

    work page 2023

  23. [23]

    C. S. Lange, T. Hansen, and L. B. Madsen, Electron- correlation-induced nonclassicality of light from high- order harmonic generation, Physical Review A 109, 033110 (2024)

    work page 2024

  24. [24]

    Theidel, V

    D. Theidel, V. Cotte, R. Sondenheimer, V. Shiriaeva, M. Froidevaux, V. Severin, A. Merdji-Larue, P. Mosel, S. Fr¨ ohlich, K.-A. Weber, U. Morgner, M. Kovacev, J. Biegert, and H. Merdji, Evidence of the quantum opti- cal nature of high-harmonic generation, PRX Quantum 5, 040319 (2024)

    work page 2024

  25. [25]

    Theidel, V

    D. Theidel, V. Cotte, P. Heinzel, H. Griguer, M. Weis, R. Sondenheimer, and H. Merdji, Observation of a mul- timode displaced squeezed state in high-harmonic gener- ation (2024), arXiv:2411.02311 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  26. [26]

    C. S. Lange and L. B. Madsen, Hierarchy of approxima- tions for describing quantum light from high-harmonic generation: A fermi-hubbard-model study, Phys. Rev. A 111, 013113 (2025)

    work page 2025

  27. [27]

    S. Yi, N. D. Klimkin, G. G. Brown, O. Smirnova, S. Patchkovskii, I. Babushkin, and M. Ivanov, Genera- tion of massively entangled bright states of light during harmonic generation in resonant media, Phys. Rev. X15, 011023 (2025)

    work page 2025

  28. [28]

    Gorlach, M

    A. Gorlach, M. E. Tzur, M. Birk, M. Kr¨ uger, N. Rivera, O. Cohen, and I. Kaminer, High-harmonic generation driven by quantum light, Nature Physics19, 1689 (2023)

    work page 2023

  29. [29]

    Even Tzur, M

    M. Even Tzur, M. Birk, A. Gorlach, M. Kr¨ uger, I. Kaminer, and O. Cohen, Photon-statistics force in ultrafast electron dynamics, Nature Photonics 17, 501 (2023)

    work page 2023

  30. [30]

    M. E. Tzur, M. Birk, A. Gorlach, I. Kaminer, M. Kr¨ uger, and O. Cohen, Generation of squeezed high-order har- monics, Physical Review Research 6, 033079 (2024)

    work page 2024

  31. [31]

    Stammer, Absence of quantum optical coherence in high harmonic generation, Physical Review Research 6, 16 L032033 (2024)

    P. Stammer, Absence of quantum optical coherence in high harmonic generation, Physical Review Research 6, 16 L032033 (2024)

    work page 2024

  32. [32]

    Pizzi, A

    A. Pizzi, A. Gorlach, N. Rivera, A. Nunnenkamp, and I. Kaminer, Light emission from strongly driven many- body systems, Nature Physics 19, 551 (2023)

    work page 2023

  33. [33]

    Lewenstein, M

    M. Lewenstein, M. F. Ciappina, E. Pisanty, J. Rivera- Dean, P. Stammer, T. Lamprou, and P. Tzallas, Gener- ation of optical Schr¨ odinger cat states in intense laser– matter interactions, Nature Physics 17, 1104 (2021)

    work page 2021

  34. [34]

    Rasputnyi, Z

    A. Rasputnyi, Z. Chen, M. Birk, O. Cohen, I. Kaminer, M. Kr¨ uger, D. Seletskiy, M. Chekhova, and F. Tani, High- harmonic generation by a bright squeezed vacuum, Na- ture Physics 20, 1960 (2024)

    work page 1960

  35. [35]

    Manceau, K

    M. Manceau, K. Y. Spasibko, G. Leuchs, R. Filip, and M. V. Chekhova, Indefinite-Mean Pareto Photon Distri- bution from Amplified Quantum Noise, Physical Review Letters 123, 123606 (2019)

    work page 2019

  36. [36]

    Lemieux, S

    S. Lemieux, S. A. Jalil, D. Purschke, N. Boroumand, D. Villeneuve, A. Naumov, T. Brabec, and G. Vampa, Photon bunching in high-harmonic emission controlled by quantum light (2024), arXiv:2404.05474

    work page arXiv 2024

  37. [37]

    Rivera-Dean, in Non-classical States of Light: Gen- eration via Strong-Field Processes and Applications in Quantum Key Distribution (Springer Nature Switzer- land, Cham, 2024)

    J. Rivera-Dean, in Non-classical States of Light: Gen- eration via Strong-Field Processes and Applications in Quantum Key Distribution (Springer Nature Switzer- land, Cham, 2024)

    work page 2024

  38. [38]

    S. L. Braunstein and P. van Loock, Quantum information with continuous variables, Reviews of Modern Physics 77, 513 (2005)

    work page 2005

  39. [39]

    P. D. Drummond and C. W. Gardiner, Generalised P- representations in quantum optics, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 13, 2353 (1980)

    work page 1980

  40. [40]

    Walls and G

    D. Walls and G. J. Milburn, Quantum Optics (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008)

    work page 2008

  41. [41]

    Cohen-Tannoudji, G

    C. Cohen-Tannoudji, G. Grynberg, and J. Dupont-Roc, Atom-Photon Interactions: Basic Processes and Applica- tions (Wiley, New York, 1998)

    work page 1998

  42. [42]

    Gerry and P

    C. Gerry and P. Knight, Introductory Quantum Optics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004)

    work page 2004

  43. [43]

    M. O. Scully and M. S. Zubairy, Quantum Optics (Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997)

    work page 1997

  44. [44]

    C. S. Lange, T. Hansen, and L. B. Madsen, Noninteger high-order harmonic generation from extended correlated systems, Physical Review A 109, 063103 (2024)

    work page 2024

  45. [45]

    M. S. Kim, F. A. M. de Oliveira, and P. L. Knight, Prop- erties of squeezed number states and squeezed thermal states, Physical Review A 40, 2494 (1989)

    work page 1989

  46. [46]

    Vampa, C

    G. Vampa, C. R. McDonald, G. Orlando, P. B. Corkum, and T. Brabec, Semiclassical analysis of high harmonic generation in bulk crystals, Physical Review B91, 064302 (2015)

    work page 2015

  47. [47]

    A. T. Andersen, S. V. B. Jensen, and L. B. Madsen, Intra- and intercycle analysis of intraband high-order harmonic generation, Physical Review A 109, 063109 (2024)

    work page 2024

  48. [48]

    Sederberg, D

    S. Sederberg, D. Zimin, S. Keiber, F. Siegrist, M. S. Wis- mer, V. S. Yakovlev, I. Floss, C. Lemell, J. Burgd¨ orfer, M. Schultze, F. Krausz, and N. Karpowicz, Attosecond optoelectronic field measurement in solids, Nature Com- munications 11, 430 (2020)

    work page 2020

  49. [49]

    D. A. Zimin, V. S. Yakovlev, and N. Karpowicz, Ultra- broadband all-optical sampling of optical waveforms, Sci- ence Advances 8, eade1029 (2022)

    work page 2022

  50. [50]

    Husakou, N

    A. Husakou, N. Karpowicz, V. S. Yakovlev, M. Ivanov, and D. A. Zimin, Towards multi-petahertz all- optical electric field sampling (2024), arXiv:2410.19196 [physics.optics]

    work page arXiv 2024

  51. [51]

    M. R. Bionta, F. Ritzkowsky, M. Turchetti, Y. Yang, D. Cattozzo Mor, W. P. Putnam, F. X. K¨ artner, K. K. Berggren, and P. D. Keathley, On-chip sampling of op- tical fields with attosecond resolution, Nature Photonics 15, 456 (2021)

    work page 2021

  52. [52]

    P. D. Keathley, S. V. B. Jensen, M. Yeung, M. R. Bionta, and L. B. Madsen, Uncovering extreme nonlinear dynam- ics in solids through time-domain field analysis, Physical Review B 107, 054302 (2023)

    work page 2023