REVIEW 2 cited by
ScriptoriumWS: A Code Generation Assistant for Weak Supervision
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Weak supervision is a popular framework for overcoming the labeled data bottleneck: the need to obtain labels for training data. In weak supervision, multiple noisy-but-cheap sources are used to provide guesses of the label and are aggregated to produce high-quality pseudolabels. These sources are often expressed as small programs written by domain experts -- and so are expensive to obtain. Instead, we argue for using code-generation models to act as coding assistants for crafting weak supervision sources. We study prompting strategies to maximize the quality of the generated sources, settling on a multi-tier strategy that incorporates multiple types of information. We explore how to best combine hand-written and generated sources. Using these insights, we introduce ScriptoriumWS, a weak supervision system that, when compared to hand-crafted sources, maintains accuracy and greatly improves coverage.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Time To Impeach LLM-as-a-Judge: Programs are the Future of Evaluation
LLM-synthesized judging programs, aggregated with weak supervision, can replace direct LLM-as-a-judge scoring at far lower API cost, with better consistency and bias resistance in some settings.
-
Codifying the Judge: Scalable Evaluation via Program Distillation
LLM judge logic can be distilled into a committee of Python scoring programs that match mid-size LLM judge accuracy on filtered preference datasets, at orders-of-magnitude higher throughput.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.