REVIEW 1 major objections 1 minor 26 references
The Wiener-process approximation result for SDE solutions extends to weak solutions of SPDEs.
Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →
T0 review · grok-4.3
2026-05-23 03:06 UTC
load-bearing objection This extends Watanabe's Wiener-process approximation to weak SPDE solutions and the argument transfers cleanly under standard Lipschitz conditions. the 1 major comments →
Approximation analysis for weak solutions of stochastic partial differential equations
The pith
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
Approximating the Wiener process makes the solutions of the approximated SPDEs converge in probability to the weak solution of the original equation.
What carries the argument
Approximation of the Wiener process transferred directly to weak solutions of SPDEs via spatial regularity.
Load-bearing premise
The SPDE admits a weak solution whose spatial regularity permits direct transfer of the Wiener-process approximation argument without additional truncation or regularization steps.
What would settle it
An explicit SPDE and weak solution satisfying the paper's conditions for which the approximated solutions fail to converge in probability to the weak solution.
If this is right
- Convergence in probability holds for SPDEs with spatial variables.
- The argument applies to weak solutions without extra regularization.
- Standard textbook approximation techniques carry over to the SPDE setting.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- Numerical schemes based on Wiener-process approximation may be justified for a wider range of SPDE models.
- The result could be tested on concrete examples such as the stochastic heat equation with additive noise.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The manuscript extends the classical Wiener-process approximation result from Watanabe's textbook—where solutions of approximated SDEs converge in probability to the true solution—to weak solutions of SPDEs that include a spatial variable. The central claim is that the approximation result still holds in the SPDE setting.
Significance. If rigorously established under standard conditions (Lipschitz coefficients, suitable noise), the result would modestly extend approximation techniques to SPDEs, addressing the noted obstacle that spatial dependence in weak solutions prevents direct application of SDE arguments. No machine-checked proofs, reproducible code, or parameter-free derivations are present.
major comments (1)
- [Abstract] Abstract: the assertion that 'the approximation result still holds' is unsupported by any proof steps, explicit conditions on coefficients, noise structure, or spatial regularity assumptions that would justify direct transfer of the convergence-in-probability argument without additional truncation or regularization. This is load-bearing for the central claim.
minor comments (1)
- [Abstract] The reference to 'Watanabe's classical textbook' should include a precise bibliographic citation (author, title, edition, page range for the relevant theorem).
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for their detailed review and constructive feedback on our manuscript extending Watanabe's Wiener-process approximation result to weak solutions of SPDEs. We address the single major comment below.
read point-by-point responses
-
Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the assertion that 'the approximation result still holds' is unsupported by any proof steps, explicit conditions on coefficients, noise structure, or spatial regularity assumptions that would justify direct transfer of the convergence-in-probability argument without additional truncation or regularization. This is load-bearing for the central claim.
Authors: We acknowledge that the abstract is brief and does not enumerate the precise hypotheses. The full manuscript proves the result under standard conditions: the drift and diffusion coefficients are Lipschitz continuous with linear growth, the noise is a cylindrical Wiener process taking values in a suitable Hilbert space, and the weak solution satisfies the requisite integrability and spatial regularity to ensure the martingale problem is well-posed. The argument adapts Watanabe's tightness-plus-identification strategy by working in the space of continuous functions valued in the dual of a Sobolev space, using the spatial variable only through the weak formulation; no additional truncation or regularization beyond the Wiener-process approximation is required. We will revise the abstract to state these assumptions explicitly so that the central claim is properly contextualized. revision: yes
Circularity Check
No significant circularity
full rationale
The paper extends Watanabe's classical Wiener-process approximation result for SDEs to weak solutions of SPDEs. The abstract and available description present this as a direct transfer of the convergence-in-probability argument under standard Lipschitz and regularity conditions on the SPDE, without any equations, fitted parameters, self-definitions, or self-citations that reduce the central claim to its own inputs by construction. The derivation is therefore self-contained against the external benchmark of the cited textbook result.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
axioms (1)
- domain assumption The SPDE under consideration admits a weak solution to which the approximation can be applied.
read the original abstract
In probability theory, how to approximate the solution of a stochastic differential equation is an important topic. In Watanabe's classical textbook, by an approximation of the Wiener process, solutions of approximated equations converge to the solution of the stochastic differential equation in probability. In traditional approximation theorems, solutions do not contain the spatial variable. In recent years, stochastic partial differential equations have been playing major roles in probability theory. If the solution is a weak one with the spatial variable, we may not be able to directly apply these classical approximation results. In this work, we try to extend the approximation result to stochastic partial differential equations case. We show that in this case, the approximation result still holds.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
RIMS, Kyoto Univ.13(1977), 285-300
Ikeda, K.; Nakao, S.; Yamato, Y.A class of approximations of Brownian motion.Publ. RIMS, Kyoto Univ.13(1977), 285-300
work page 1977
-
[2]
Kunita, H.Diffusion processes and control systems.Sangyo Tosho, Tokyo, 1976(In Japanese)
work page 1976
-
[3]
Malliavin, P.Stochastic calculus of variation and hypoelliptic operator.Proc. Intern. Symp. SDE Kyoto 1976(ed. by K. Itˆ o), 195-263, Kinokuniya, Tokyo, 1978
work page 1976
-
[4]
Nakao, S.; Yamato, Y.Approximation theorem on stochastic differential equations.Proc. Intern. Symp. SDE Kyoto 1976(ed. by K. Itˆ o), 283-296, Kinokuniya, Tokyo, 1978
work page 1976
-
[5]
J.Stochastic differential equations and models of random processes.Proc
Shane, E. J.Stochastic differential equations and models of random processes.Proc. Sixth Berkeley Symp. Math. Statist. Prob. III, 263-294, Univ. California Press, Berkeley, 1972
work page 1972
-
[6]
Stroock, D. W.; Varadhan, S. R. S.On the support of diffusion processes with applications to the strong maximum principle.Proc. Sixth Berkeley Symp. Math. Statist. Prob. III, 361-368, Univ. California Press, Berkeley, 1972
work page 1972
-
[7]
Wong, E.; Zakai, M.On the relation between ordinary and stochastic differential equations.Intern. J. Engng. Sci.3(1965), 213-229
work page 1965
-
[8]
North- Holland, Amsterdam, 1989
Ikeda, N.; Watanabe, S.Stochastic Differential Equations and Diffusion processes.2nd edition. North- Holland, Amsterdam, 1989
work page 1989
-
[9]
Karatzas, I.; Shreve, S.Brownian motion and Stochastic calculus.Graduate Texts Math.113, Springer, New York, 1988
work page 1988
-
[10]
V.On Kolmogorovs equations for finite dimensional diffusions.In N.V.Krylov, M
Krylov, N. V.On Kolmogorovs equations for finite dimensional diffusions.In N.V.Krylov, M. R¨ ockner and J.Zabczyk.Stochastic PDEs and Kolmogorov Equations in Infinite Dimensions(Cetraro, 1998). Lecture Notes Math. 1715, pp. 1-63. Springer, Berlin, 1999
work page 1998
-
[11]
Pr´ evˆ ot, C.; R¨ ockner, M.A concise course on Stochastic Partial Differential Equations.Lecture Notes Math, 1905. Springer, Berlin, 2007
work page 1905
-
[12]
Chen, L.; J¨ ungel, A.Analysis of a multi-dimensional parabolic population model with strong cross- diffusion.SIAM J. Math. Anal.36(2004), 301-322
work page 2004
-
[13]
Chen, L.; J¨ ungel, A.Analysis of a parabolic cross-diffusion population model without self-diffusion.J. Differ. Eqs.224(2006), 39-59. 26 X. LIN
work page 2006
-
[14]
Chen, X.; Daus, E.; J¨ ungel, A.Global existence analysis of cross-diffusion population systems for multiple species.Archive Rat. Mech. Anal.227(2018), 715-747
work page 2018
-
[15]
Chen, X.; J¨ ungel, A.Global renormalized solutions to reaction-cross-diffusion systems with self- diffusion.J. Diff. Eqs.267(2019), 5901-5937
work page 2019
-
[16]
Braukhoff, M.; Huber, F.; J¨ ungel, A.Global martingale solutions for a stochastic Shigesada-Kawasaki- Teramoto population model.Stochastic and Partial Differential Equations: Analysis and Computa- tions.12(2024),525-575
work page 2024
-
[17]
Dhariwal, G.; J¨ ungel, A.; Zamponi, N.Global martingale solutions for a stochastic population cross- diffusion system.Stochastic Process. Appl.129(2019), 3792-3820
work page 2019
-
[18]
Shigesada, N.; Kawasaki, K.; Teramoto, E.Spatial segregation of interacting species.J. Theor. Biol. 79(1979), 83-99
work page 1979
-
[19]
Wong, E.; Zakai, M.On the convergence of ordinary integrals to stochastic integrals.Ann. Math. Statist.36(1965), 1560-1564
work page 1965
-
[20]
Twardowska, K.Wong-Zakai approximations for stochastic differential equations.Acta. Appl. Math. 43(1996), 317-359
work page 1996
-
[21]
Ma, T.; Zhu, R.Wong-Zakai approximation and support theorem for SPDEs with locally monotone coefficients.J. Math. Anal. Appl.469(2019), 623-660
work page 2019
-
[22]
Burger, M.; Francesco, M. D.; Pietschmann, J. F.; Schlake, B.Nonlinear cross-diffusion with size exclusion.SIAM J. Math. Anal.42(2010), 2842-2871
work page 2010
-
[23]
F.On a reaction-cross-diffusion system modeling the growth of Glioblastoma.SIAM J
Burger, M.; Friele, P.; Pietschmann, J. F.On a reaction-cross-diffusion system modeling the growth of Glioblastoma.SIAM J. Appl. Math80(2020), 160-182
work page 2020
-
[24]
Burger, M.; Schlake, B.; Wolfram, W. T.Nonlinear Poisson-Nernst-Planck equations for ion flux through confined geometries.Nonlinearity.25(2012), 961-990
work page 2012
-
[25]
Zamponi, N.; J¨ ungel, A.Analysis of degenerate cross-diffusion population models with volume filling. Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e Anal. Non Lin´ eaire34(2017), 1-29. (Erratum:34(2017), 789-792.)
work page 2017
-
[26]
Ahmed, M.; Zada, A.; Ghader, M.; George, R.; Rezapour, S.On the existence and stability of a neutral stochastic fractional differential system.Fractal Fract.6(2022), 203. Department of Mathematics and Physics, Guangzhou Maritime University, Guangzhou 510725, Guangdong Province, China Email address:linxi@gzmtu.edu.cn
work page 2022
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.