Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Capturing Human Cognitive Styles with Language: Towards an Experimental Evaluation Paradigm

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.13326 v1 pith:AGXHT7A2 submitted 2025-02-18 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords cognitivestyledecisionstateslanguagecapturedeterminedhuman
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

While NLP models often seek to capture cognitive states via language, the validity of predicted states is determined by comparing them to annotations created without access the cognitive states of the authors. In behavioral sciences, cognitive states are instead measured via experiments. Here, we introduce an experiment-based framework for evaluating language-based cognitive style models against human behavior. We explore the phenomenon of decision making, and its relationship to the linguistic style of an individual talking about a recent decision they made. The participants then follow a classical decision-making experiment that captures their cognitive style, determined by how preferences change during a decision exercise. We find that language features, intended to capture cognitive style, can predict participants' decision style with moderate-to-high accuracy (AUC ~ 0.8), demonstrating that cognitive style can be partly captured and revealed by discourse patterns.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools