REVIEW 1 cited by
Balancing Flexibility and Interpretability: A Conditional Linear Model Estimation via Random Forest
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Balancing Flexibility and Interpretability: A Conditional Linear Model Estimation via Random Forest
read the original abstract
Traditional parametric econometric models often rely on rigid functional forms, while nonparametric techniques, despite their flexibility, frequently lack interpretability. This paper proposes a parsimonious alternative by modeling the outcome $Y$ as a linear function of a vector of variables of interest $\boldsymbol{X}$, conditional on additional covariates $\boldsymbol{Z}$. Specifically, the conditional expectation is expressed as $\mathbb{E}[Y|\boldsymbol{X},\boldsymbol{Z}]=\boldsymbol{X}^{T}\boldsymbol{\beta}(\boldsymbol{Z})$, where $\boldsymbol{\beta}(\cdot)$ is an unknown Lipschitz-continuous function. We introduce an adaptation of the Random Forest (RF) algorithm to estimate this model, balancing the flexibility of machine learning methods with the interpretability of traditional linear models. This approach addresses a key challenge in applied econometrics by accommodating heterogeneity in the relationship between covariates and outcomes. Furthermore, the heterogeneous partial effects of $\boldsymbol{X}$ on $Y$ are represented by $\boldsymbol{\beta}(\cdot)$ and can be directly estimated using our proposed method. Our framework effectively unifies established parametric and nonparametric models, including varying-coefficient, switching regression, and additive models. We provide theoretical guarantees, such as pointwise and $L^p$-norm rates of convergence for the estimator, and establish a pointwise central limit theorem through subsampling, aiding inference on the function $\boldsymbol\beta(\cdot)$. We present Monte Carlo simulation results to assess the finite-sample performance of the method.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
LGB+: A Macroeconomic Forecasting Road Test
LGB+ improves macroeconomic forecasts by letting linear basis functions compete with or alternate against tree updates inside gradient boosting, yielding native linear/nonlinear decomposition of predictions.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.