Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

UM_FHS at TREC 2024 PLABA: Exploration of Fine-tuning and AI agent approach for plain language adaptations of biomedical text

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.14144 v1 pith:SBRMB7BM submitted 2025-02-19 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords approachengineeringfine-tuninggpt-4o-minimodelspromptresultsaccuracy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper describes our submissions to the TREC 2024 PLABA track with the aim to simplify biomedical abstracts for a K8-level audience (13-14 years old students). We tested three approaches using OpenAI's gpt-4o and gpt-4o-mini models: baseline prompt engineering, a two-AI agent approach, and fine-tuning. Adaptations were evaluated using qualitative metrics (5-point Likert scales for simplicity, accuracy, completeness, and brevity) and quantitative readability scores (Flesch-Kincaid grade level, SMOG Index). Results indicated that the two-agent approach and baseline prompt engineering with gpt-4o-mini models show superior qualitative performance, while fine-tuned models excelled in accuracy and completeness but were less simple. The evaluation results demonstrated that prompt engineering with gpt-4o-mini outperforms iterative improvement strategies via two-agent approach as well as fine-tuning with gpt-4o. We intend to expand our investigation of the results and explore advanced evaluations.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Lessons from the TREC Plain Language Adaptation of Biomedical Abstracts (PLABA) track

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Across two TREC shared-task years, top LLM systems matched human writers on factual accuracy and completeness but not on simplicity or brevity, while common automatic metrics correlated poorly with manual judgments.

Pith tools