REVIEW 3 cited by
Mitigating Lost-in-Retrieval Problems in Retrieval Augmented Multi-Hop Question Answering
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
In this paper, we identify a critical problem, "lost-in-retrieval", in retrieval-augmented multi-hop question answering (QA): the key entities are missed in LLMs' sub-question decomposition. "Lost-in-retrieval" significantly degrades the retrieval performance, which disrupts the reasoning chain and leads to the incorrect answers. To resolve this problem, we propose a progressive retrieval and rewriting method, namely ChainRAG, which sequentially handles each sub-question by completing missing key entities and retrieving relevant sentences from a sentence graph for answer generation. Each step in our retrieval and rewriting process builds upon the previous one, creating a seamless chain that leads to accurate retrieval and answers. Finally, all retrieved sentences and sub-question answers are integrated to generate a comprehensive answer to the original question. We evaluate ChainRAG on three multi-hop QA datasets - MuSiQue, 2Wiki, and HotpotQA - using three large language models: GPT4o-mini, Qwen2.5-72B, and GLM-4-Plus. Empirical results demonstrate that ChainRAG consistently outperforms baselines in both effectiveness and efficiency.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Curriculum Guided Reinforcement Learning for Efficient Multi Hop Retrieval Augmented Generation
EVO-RAG applies curriculum-guided reinforcement learning with time-varying reward weights to multi-hop RAG, reporting improved EM on HotpotQA, 2WikiMultiHopQA, and MuSiQue.
-
When Can Large Reasoning Models Save Thinking? Mechanistic Analysis of Behavioral Divergence in Reasoning
QwQ-32B under a save-thinking prompt exhibits three modes, no thinking, explicit thinking, and implicit thinking, with no-thinking saving tokens but losing accuracy while explicit and implicit thinking preserve accuracy.
-
Question Decomposition for Retrieval-Augmented Generation
Splitting multi-hop questions into subquestions and reranking the merged retrieval pool improves RAG evidence coverage and answer accuracy on MultiHop-RAG and HotpotQA.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.